HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>
>> https://archive.vn/jW1LE
>>
>>
>> NHS wants to sedate Down’s syndrome patient for Covid jab against
>> mother’s will
>> Mother of patient describes ‘covert’ spiking of drinks as ‘tantamount to
>> assault’ and breach of human rights
>>
>>
>> The patient is the subject of a series of Court of Protection orders
>> because he 'lacks capacity' and cannot make decisions for himself
>> The patient is the subject of a series of Court of Protection orders
>> because he ‘lacks capacity’ and cannot make decisions for himself
>> Steve Bird
>> 28 September 2024 4:26pm
>> A mother has launched a legal battle to stop the state from spiking her
>> Down’s syndrome son’s drinks with sedatives so he can be jabbed with the
>> Covid vaccine, The Telegraph can reveal.
>> Cups of tea and glasses of orange juice have been secretly laced with
>> sedatives to subdue the man, in his thirties, so he can be given the
>> vaccine and booster jabs.
>> But his mother now is planning to prosecute her local NHS integrated
>> care board (ICB) for “forced vaccination”, which she claims is
>> “tantamount to assault” and a breach of his human rights.
>> Adam, whose name has been changed because he cannot be identified, is
>> the subject of a series of Court of Protection orders because he “lacks
>> capacity” and cannot make decisions for himself.
>> His ICB, which also cannot be named, obtained a court order in 2021
>> allowing the “covert” spiking so he can be given the AstraZeneca vaccine.
>> The court concluded the vaccine was in Adam’s “best interests” because
>> he is in a “clinical risk group” due to his learning disabilities,
>> autism, Down’s syndrome and obesity.
>> The method of sedating him via a drink was chosen because it “avoids the
>> use of restraint or physical force” and overcomes Adam’s needle phobia,
>> legal papers seen by The Telegraph explain.
>> Catherine, his mother, is fighting a fresh application made by the ICB
>> to allow care home staff to administer sedation and vaccines without
>> having to seek court approval each time the Government issues new
>> vaccine guidance.
>> ‘The pandemic is over’
>> “The pandemic is over and Covid is now treated as little more than the
>> common cold,” his mother, who is in her 60s and from the home counties,
>> said. “But my son is being categorised as at the same risk as those with
>> life-threatening diseases.
>> “It is terrifying that this is happening years after the pandemic and at
>> a time when we are not required to wear masks or socially distance.
>> “As Adam’s mother, I know what is best for him. I think this excessive
>> state intervention is unfair, particularly now the Covid landscape has
>> changed so drastically.”
>> The mother and her legal team have set up a crowdfunding campaign called
>> “Stop Sedate-to-Vaccinate” to raise funds for her to fight the NHS
>> application for “forced medical treatments”.
>> A court previously heard that Adam struggled to follow social distancing
>> rules because he liked to “hug” people.
>> His carers, including his doctor and a solicitor assigned by the court
>> to represent him, believe he needs the vaccine because Government
>> guidelines classify him as vulnerable due to his “chronic neurological
>> disease”.
>> Benefits outweigh risks
>> The 2021 ruling by Judge Brown concluded that although Adam “finds
>> health interventions distressing” the benefits of the vaccine “far
>> outweigh the risks”.
>> But his mother, a devout Christian, claims administering the vaccine
>> “against his will” has meant he “will not be able to trust people and
>> his life will be filled with fear”, adding that it amounts “to unlawful
>> use of restraint.”
>> She also claims he has lost weight and “is healthier than the average
>> person” who “hardly gets a cold” and has already had Covid which was mild.
>> The judge concluded she was in no position to rule on the efficacy of
>> the vaccine or some of the other theories about it which were based on
>> “extraordinary and dangerous misinformation”.
>> In her ruling allowing the initial vaccination, Judge Brown wrote how
>> she understood “genuine and legitimate concern from some, about the
>> administering of a new vaccine to combat a new virus”, adding how some
>> people “legitimately and in good faith, raise questions about its
>> efficacy and possible side effects.”
>> ‘Waste of public money’
>> The mother’s lawyer, Stephen Jackson of Jackson Osborne Solicitors, said
>> Adam’s four years of good health without vaccination since the pandemic
>> “speaks volumes for his natural immune system.”
>> “This is a scandalous waste of public money. The Joint Committee on
>> Vaccination and Immunisation assesses they need to jab approximately
>> 10,500 people like Adam to avoid just one non-severe visit to the hospital.
>> “At £25 a shot, that’s £262,000 that could be better spent, leave aside
>> the cost of these proceedings.”
>> A spokesman for the UK Health Security Agency, the government body
>> responsible for public health protection, said it would be
>> “inappropriate” to comment on a specific case.
>> He added: “Vaccination is voluntary on the basis of informed consent.
>> Where an adult is unable to consent for themselves it is a matter for
>> their doctors to consider their best interests in collaboration with
>> relatives.”
>> The integrated care board, which insists Adam’s sedation and vaccination
>> are legal, declined to comment “because of patient confidentiality”.
>> The case will be heard at the Court of Protection in November.
>> Inside the secret sedation plot
>> As a “thank you” for having a mug of breakfast tea and a glass of orange
>> juice brought into his room, Adam invariably hugged the staff he trusts
>> so implicitly at his care home.
>> Unbeknown to him, on five separate occasions over the last 16 months
>> those drinks were laced with a “covert anxiolytic medication” – a
>> powerful sedative. Twice he became groggy before eventually succumbing
>> to a deep sleep.
>> Each time, a team of senior carers, a nurse and the home’s manager stood
>> quietly outside the room awaiting the nod to enter. One of them was
>> armed with a syringe – kept well hidden due to Adam’s needle phobia -
>> loaded with the Covid vaccine.
>> When the sedatives worked, Adam’s sleeve was quickly rolled up, the
>> antiseptic wipe swiped over his upper arm and the needle inserted deep
>> into his muscle as the plunger was pressed emptying the syringe barrel
>> of its viscous contents. One carer made copious notes in readiness for a
>> report which would be sent to the Court of Protection explaining how the
>> procedure had gone.
>> On two occasions, in November 2023 and June 2024, the primary dose and
>> booster were administered, one carer then had the arduous task of
>> telephoning Adam’s mother to inform her that despite her opposition her
>> son had been vaccinated.
>> Foiled plot
>> Three times the secret sedation plot was foiled by Adam. In May 2023,
>> “he poured the drink down the sink”, legal papers show. In June this
>> year, the “oral sedative (Lorazepam) was not effective”.
>> The Court of Protection orders approved the use of one of three possible
>> sedatives; 30mg of Temazepam, 4mg of Lorazepam or 10mg of Diazepam.
>> One document states that “AD [Adam] has not suffered any complications
>> or side-effects following the administration of the vaccine and/or
>> sedation.”
>> At the height of the pandemic, his carers had attempted to assess how
>> capable he was of expressing his opinions about whether or not he wanted
>> to be vaccinated. Four times they went through a special pack created by
>> Mind, the mental health charity, that explained how the vaccine works
>> and can be administered.
>> Adam said ‘no’
>> “On all occasions when a picture showing a vaccine being administered
>> was used, AD [Adam] shook his head and said ‘no’,” one ruling notes.
>> It adds: “However, he demonstrated limited understanding of the
>> information given to him about the Covid-19 virus.”
>> A judge concluded that Adam should have the jab because the “benefits
>> far outweigh the risks”. She approved the “covert” sedation process
>> because it prevented restraint and the use of force.
>> Adam’s mother, who visits her son at his special care home nearly every
>> day and attends church with him on Sundays, believes the drugging and
>> injection of her son represents an assault.
>> “Adam won’t take tablets,” his mother says. “So, they have had to hide
>> the sedatives in either a cup of tea, glass of orange juice or even
>> Coke. It is very upsetting.
>> “I am not alerted to when it happens. I get one telephone call after the
>> event.”
>
> In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
> GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
> secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
> us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
> pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
> 100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
> appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).
>
> Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
> COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
> rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
> moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
> contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
> "convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
> self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
> Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
> scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
> Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
> combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
> that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
> longer effective.
>
> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
> ) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.
>
> So how are you ?
>
I am wonderfully hungry!

Michael