Michael Ejercito wrote:

>https://archive.vn/jW1LE
>
>
>NHS wants to sedate Down’s syndrome patient for Covid jab against
>mother’s will
>Mother of patient describes ‘covert’ spiking of drinks as ‘tantamount to
>assault’ and breach of human rights
>
>
>The patient is the subject of a series of Court of Protection orders
>because he 'lacks capacity' and cannot make decisions for himself
>The patient is the subject of a series of Court of Protection orders
>because he ‘lacks capacity’ and cannot make decisions for himself
>Steve Bird
>28 September 2024 4:26pm
>A mother has launched a legal battle to stop the state from spiking her
>Down’s syndrome son’s drinks with sedatives so he can be jabbed with the
>Covid vaccine, The Telegraph can reveal.
>Cups of tea and glasses of orange juice have been secretly laced with
>sedatives to subdue the man, in his thirties, so he can be given the
>vaccine and booster jabs.
>But his mother now is planning to prosecute her local NHS integrated
>care board (ICB) for “forced vaccination”, which she claims is
>“tantamount to assault” and a breach of his human rights.
>Adam, whose name has been changed because he cannot be identified, is
>the subject of a series of Court of Protection orders because he “lacks
>capacity” and cannot make decisions for himself.
>His ICB, which also cannot be named, obtained a court order in 2021
>allowing the “covert” spiking so he can be given the AstraZeneca vaccine.
>The court concluded the vaccine was in Adam’s “best interests” because
>he is in a “clinical risk group” due to his learning disabilities,
>autism, Down’s syndrome and obesity.
>The method of sedating him via a drink was chosen because it “avoids the
>use of restraint or physical force” and overcomes Adam’s needle phobia,
>legal papers seen by The Telegraph explain.
>Catherine, his mother, is fighting a fresh application made by the ICB
>to allow care home staff to administer sedation and vaccines without
>having to seek court approval each time the Government issues new
>vaccine guidance.
>‘The pandemic is over’
>“The pandemic is over and Covid is now treated as little more than the
>common cold,” his mother, who is in her 60s and from the home counties,
>said. “But my son is being categorised as at the same risk as those with
>life-threatening diseases.
>“It is terrifying that this is happening years after the pandemic and at
>a time when we are not required to wear masks or socially distance.
>“As Adam’s mother, I know what is best for him. I think this excessive
>state intervention is unfair, particularly now the Covid landscape has
>changed so drastically.”
>The mother and her legal team have set up a crowdfunding campaign called
>“Stop Sedate-to-Vaccinate” to raise funds for her to fight the NHS
>application for “forced medical treatments”.
>A court previously heard that Adam struggled to follow social distancing
>rules because he liked to “hug” people.
>His carers, including his doctor and a solicitor assigned by the court
>to represent him, believe he needs the vaccine because Government
>guidelines classify him as vulnerable due to his “chronic neurological
>disease”.
>Benefits outweigh risks
>The 2021 ruling by Judge Brown concluded that although Adam “finds
>health interventions distressing” the benefits of the vaccine “far
>outweigh the risks”.
>But his mother, a devout Christian, claims administering the vaccine
>“against his will” has meant he “will not be able to trust people and
>his life will be filled with fear”, adding that it amounts “to unlawful
>use of restraint.”
>She also claims he has lost weight and “is healthier than the average
>person” who “hardly gets a cold” and has already had Covid which was mild.
>The judge concluded she was in no position to rule on the efficacy of
>the vaccine or some of the other theories about it which were based on
>“extraordinary and dangerous misinformation”.
>In her ruling allowing the initial vaccination, Judge Brown wrote how
>she understood “genuine and legitimate concern from some, about the
>administering of a new vaccine to combat a new virus”, adding how some
>people “legitimately and in good faith, raise questions about its
>efficacy and possible side effects.”
>‘Waste of public money’
>The mother’s lawyer, Stephen Jackson of Jackson Osborne Solicitors, said
>Adam’s four years of good health without vaccination since the pandemic
>“speaks volumes for his natural immune system.”
>“This is a scandalous waste of public money. The Joint Committee on
>Vaccination and Immunisation assesses they need to jab approximately
>10,500 people like Adam to avoid just one non-severe visit to the hospital.
>“At £25 a shot, that’s £262,000 that could be better spent, leave aside
>the cost of these proceedings.”
>A spokesman for the UK Health Security Agency, the government body
>responsible for public health protection, said it would be
>“inappropriate” to comment on a specific case.
>He added: “Vaccination is voluntary on the basis of informed consent.
>Where an adult is unable to consent for themselves it is a matter for
>their doctors to consider their best interests in collaboration with
>relatives.”
>The integrated care board, which insists Adam’s sedation and vaccination
>are legal, declined to comment “because of patient confidentiality”.
>The case will be heard at the Court of Protection in November.
>Inside the secret sedation plot
>As a “thank you” for having a mug of breakfast tea and a glass of orange
>juice brought into his room, Adam invariably hugged the staff he trusts
>so implicitly at his care home.
>Unbeknown to him, on five separate occasions over the last 16 months
>those drinks were laced with a “covert anxiolytic medication” – a
>powerful sedative. Twice he became groggy before eventually succumbing
>to a deep sleep.
>Each time, a team of senior carers, a nurse and the home’s manager stood
>quietly outside the room awaiting the nod to enter. One of them was
>armed with a syringe – kept well hidden due to Adam’s needle phobia -
>loaded with the Covid vaccine.
>When the sedatives worked, Adam’s sleeve was quickly rolled up, the
>antiseptic wipe swiped over his upper arm and the needle inserted deep
>into his muscle as the plunger was pressed emptying the syringe barrel
>of its viscous contents. One carer made copious notes in readiness for a
>report which would be sent to the Court of Protection explaining how the
>procedure had gone.
>On two occasions, in November 2023 and June 2024, the primary dose and
>booster were administered, one carer then had the arduous task of
>telephoning Adam’s mother to inform her that despite her opposition her
>son had been vaccinated.
>Foiled plot
>Three times the secret sedation plot was foiled by Adam. In May 2023,
>“he poured the drink down the sink”, legal papers show. In June this
>year, the “oral sedative (Lorazepam) was not effective”.
>The Court of Protection orders approved the use of one of three possible
>sedatives; 30mg of Temazepam, 4mg of Lorazepam or 10mg of Diazepam.
>One document states that “AD [Adam] has not suffered any complications
>or side-effects following the administration of the vaccine and/or
>sedation.”
>At the height of the pandemic, his carers had attempted to assess how
>capable he was of expressing his opinions about whether or not he wanted
>to be vaccinated. Four times they went through a special pack created by
>Mind, the mental health charity, that explained how the vaccine works
>and can be administered.
>Adam said ‘no’
>“On all occasions when a picture showing a vaccine being administered
>was used, AD [Adam] shook his head and said ‘no’,” one ruling notes.
>It adds: “However, he demonstrated limited understanding of the
>information given to him about the Covid-19 virus.”
>A judge concluded that Adam should have the jab because the “benefits
>far outweigh the risks”. She approved the “covert” sedation process
>because it prevented restraint and the use of force.
>Adam’s mother, who visits her son at his special care home nearly every
>day and attends church with him on Sundays, believes the drugging and
>injection of her son represents an assault.
>“Adam won’t take tablets,” his mother says. “So, they have had to hide
>the sedatives in either a cup of tea, glass of orange juice or even
>Coke. It is very upsetting.
>“I am not alerted to when it happens. I get one telephone call after the
>event.”

In the interim, we are 100% prepared/protected in the "full armor of
GOD" (Ephesians 6:11) which we put on as soon as we use Apostle Paul's
secret (Philippians 4:12). Though masking is less protective, it helps
us avoid the appearance of doing the evil of spreading airborne
pathogens while there are people getting sick because of not being
100% protected. It is written that we're to "abstain from **all**
appearance of doing evil" (1 Thessalonians 5:22 w/**emphasis**).

Meanwhile, the only *perfect* (Matt 5:47-8 ) way to eradicate the
COVID-19 virus, thereby saving lives, in the UK & elsewhere is by
rapidly (i.e. use the "Rapid COVID-19 Test" ) finding out at any given
moment, including even while on-line, who among us are unwittingly
contagious (i.e pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic) in order to
"convince it forward" (John 15:12) for them to call their doctor and
self-quarantine per their doctor in hopes of stopping this pandemic.
Thus, we're hoping for the best while preparing for the worse-case
scenario of the Alpha lineage mutations and others like the Omicron,
Gamma, Beta, Epsilon, Iota, Lambda, Mu & Delta lineage mutations
combining via slip-RNA-replication to form hybrids like "Deltamicron"
that may render current COVID vaccines/monoclonals/medicines/pills no
longer effective.

Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry (
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/6ZoE95d-VKc/m/14vVZoyOBgAJ
) and hope you, Michael, also have a healthy appetite too.

So how are you ?