Rocksolid Light

News from da outaworlds

mail  files  register  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Good news. Ten weeks from Friday will be a pretty good day.


sci / sci.med.cardiology / (AntiChrist45) Praying w/ Michael Ejercito for "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy Spirit on 08/10/24 ...

Subject: (AntiChrist45) Praying w/ Michael Ejercito for "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy Spirit on 08/10/24 ...
From: HeartDoc Andrew
Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology, alt.bible.prophecy, uk.legal, soc.culture.israel, alt.christnet.christianlife
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:49 UTC
References: 1 2 3
From: disciple@T3WiJ.com (HeartDoc Andrew)
Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology,alt.bible.prophecy,uk.legal,soc.culture.israel,alt.christnet.christianlife
Subject: (AntiChrist45) Praying w/ Michael Ejercito for "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy Spirit on 08/10/24 ...
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 12:49:39 -0400
Organization: NewsDemon - www.newsdemon.com
Message-Id: <jk5fbj1npd45thpbpb1apitg1slgp6124t@4ax.com>
References: <v958sh$or46$1@dont-email.me> <ncccbjpj982mto7ern8rk5g23n8gmitkdg@4ax.com> <v981s7$n59r$1@dont-email.me>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1171
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 158
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.newsdemon.com!not-for-mail
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:49:39 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 9307
X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com
View all headers

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/08/09/another-day-another-fact-free-anti-trump-smear-from-the-axis/#more-130814
>>>
>>>
>>> Another Day, Another Fact-Free Anti-Trump Smear From The Axis
>>> August 9, 2024 / Jack Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>> One can safely add Yahoo! and the Los Angeles Times to the massive list
>>> of media organs that are ethically estopped from calling Donald Trump a
>>> habitual liar, since they habitually lie about him.
>>>
>>> The most recent example comes from the Times uncritically and
>>> deceptively reporting on a series of hyper-partisan, hysterical rants by
>>> LGTBQ+ Democrats in San Francisco (well, its San Francisco). Yahoo! then
>>> circulated the propaganda under its own banner online. Like the good
>>> little Axis of Unethical Conduct members they are, the LA Times and
>>> Yahoo! dutifully reported pure Trump Derangement fiction as news, and it
>>> was biased, dishonest, unethical journalism from the headline to the finish.
>>>
>>> Which, ironically, is not news either. This is how the news media has
>>> been operating where Trump is involved for ten years. This is how it
>>> plans on winning the Presidency for the Democrats again.
>>>
>>> The headline is “‘Our lives are on the line’: Why many LGBTQ+ people
>>> hope for a Harris win.” Not one LGBTQ+ American’s “life is on the line”
>>> in this election by any stretch of the imagination. Trump does not
>>> oppose gay rights or same sex marriage. He has made it clear that he
>>> believes in treating such citizens as anyone else should be treated.
>>> Believing, as most conservatives, Republicans and people who haven’t
>>> been brainwashed or bullied do, that LGBTQ+ lifestyle propaganda does
>>> not belong in public school classes does not endanger LGBTQ+ rights or
>>> lives.
>>>
>>> But the Times (and then Yahoo!) lied, because that’s what progressive
>>> journalism does now. It begins,
>>>
>>>
>>> “At a recent celebration of San Francisco’s vibrant transgender past,
>>> one speaker after another directed the crowd’s attention to a worrisome
>>> future, casting November’s presidential election as a turning point for
>>> the LGBTQ+ community and the nation as a whole.”
>>>
>>> What’s a “vibrant transgender past”? That’s not journalism, that’s hype,
>>> and a competent editor would red-pencil it. The fact that a group of
>>> hard-core, leftist activists see a “worrisome” future doesn’t make it
>>> ethical for the Times to report that assessment as fact. “Directed the
>>> crowd’s attention to what they believe is a worrisome future” is
>>> reporting, journalism. The way the Times stated it is advocacy.
>>>
>>> “This election will determine our fate,” said Sofía Sabina Ríos
>>> Dorantes, deputy director of El/La Para TransLatinas, a local advocacy
>>> organization. “It will determine whether we continue to face
>>> discrimination and marginalization at [a] disproportionate rate, or
>>> whether we can continue walking toward the recognition and respect we
>>> deserve.”
>>>
>>> There is literally no basis for any of that claim, and a news outlet is
>>> obligated to say so. How will this election do any of that? There is
>>> less discrimination against gays and same sex couples now than at any
>>> time in our history. Trump doesn’t mention gay rights and gay marriage.
>>> The sole matters of contention that do occupy the attention of
>>> conservatives are 1) the strange, anti-female obsession of parts of the
>>> radical Left with allowing trans athletes to compete against girls and
>>> women in sports where size and strength is an advantage, and 2) the fad
>>> of imposing “gender-affirming care” on minors who have become confused
>>> about their gender identity in the midst of an indoctrination campaign.
>>> Opposing the first is not advocating “discrimination and
>>> marginalization,” just fairness and common sense. Opposing the second is
>>> expressing legitimate concern for the health of children whose lives are
>>> at risk of being distorted by politics.
>>>
>>> If the Times were interested in journalism rather than allying with
>>> activists, it would not use the intentionally deceptive cover-phrase
>>> “gender affirming care” to mean “giving children puberty blockers,
>>> steroids and irreversible unnecessary surgical procedures because they
>>> have been convinced that they are the ‘wrong’ sex.”
>>>
>>> Trump’s decision to ban transsexuals from military service is the only
>>> substantive policy that LGBTQ+ can point to as having an arguably
>>> adverse effect on a small component of their group’s rights. How many
>>> people are we talking about here? Since the only purpose of the military
>>> is national defense, the determination that including this tiny,
>>> inherently confusing and arguably emotionally disturbed minority in our
>>> armed forces is unwise is hardly constitutes an existential threat to
>>> the entire LGBTQ+ community or their rights.
>>>
>>> The lying is flagrant: The Times hops on the contrived “Project 25”
>>> hysteria, but gets truly deceptive in its links. “Dangerous” links to a
>>> story about Republicans opposing the extreme trans agenda. How is
>>> disagreement over allowing children to decide to be permanently altered
>>> “dangerous” to the LGBTQ community? (Any dissent from leftist cant is
>>> “dangerous.” I get it.)
>>>
>>> I checked the last two links in this paragraph:
>>>
>>> “In three months, Americans will choose between Vice President Kamala
>>> Harris, who is a Bay Area native and longtime LGBTQ+ ally, and former
>>> President Trump, who has a long record of attacking queer rights and has
>>> aligned himself with some of the nation’s most virulently anti-LGBTQ+
>>> political groups.”
>>>
>>> Trump’s “record” of attacking LGBTQ rights linked to a story about Trump
>>> criticizing Biden’s obnoxious decision to salute the (already absurd)
>>> “Transgender Day of Visibility” on Easter. There is no “right” to have
>>> your group recognized by the President on Easter. And, as in the rest of
>>> the Times hit piece, by “LGBTQ” the Times only meant the “T.” Solidarity
>>> is admirable, but lying and deceit are not. Challenging an extreme trans
>>> agenda does not threaten LGBTQ rights. It is the illogical equivalent of
>>> claiming that the extreme pit bull breed bans in many cities “endanger
>>> all dogs.”
>>>
>>> “Aligned himself‘ is worse. Trump has accepted the endorsement of
>>> religious groups and evangelicals who follow moral imperatives in their
>>> faiths that gays don’t like—-as if the Democrats wouldn’t love to have
>>> the endorsements of any of these groups. Accepting the endorsement of a
>>> group does not mean a candidate accepts all the positions of that group,
>>> and the Times knows that. Nonetheless, it intentionally deceives its
>>> readers because its Axis allies do.
>>>
>>> This is how the mainstream media is attempting to rig the election—well,
>>> one of many ways.
>>
>> Meanwhile ...
>>
>> #TrumpIsTheAntiChrist as proven by Brother Paul via Scripture at
>> https://AntiChrist45.com with 100% certainty so that we can be certain
>> that #MaGa is his dyslexic #M666 Hellmark.
>>
>> Bottom line:
>>
>> Being 100% certain that #TrumpIsTheAntiChrist (see
>> https://AntiChrist45.com) is being 100% certain of the need to always
>> be #RaptureReady (see https://bit.ly/RaptureRiddle) now.
>>
>> Indeed, I am http://WonderfullyHungry.org for food right now (Luke
>> 6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a
>> healthy appetite for food right now too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

SubjectRepliesAuthor
o Another Day, Another Fact-Free Anti-Trump Smear From The Axis

By: Michael Ejercito on Fri, 9 Aug 2024

36Michael Ejercito

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor