On 11/24/2024 2:21 PM, D wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 24 Nov 2024, clams casino wrote:
>
>> On 11/24/2024 3:37 AM, D wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, 23 Nov 2024, clams casino wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/23/2024 2:43 PM, D wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 23 Nov 2024, Coogan's Bluff wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>>>>> As if universities are the entire world.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> where do their students/leaders migrate off to?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As we know, the conflicts
>>>>>>> in academia are so bitter because the stakes are so small.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You really are one of the dumbest cunts I have ever seen!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peer grant herding and the climate change hoax  - learn!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://thehighwire.com/editorial/new-peer-reviewed-study-co2-has-zero-impact-on-climate-change/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A powerful peer-reviewed scientific study delivers substantial
>>>>>> evidence that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the atmosphere
>>>>>> have zero impact on the Earth’s global temperatures. The study
>>>>>> concludes that even though most publications attempt to depict a
>>>>>> catastrophic future for our planet due to an increase in CO2,
>>>>>> there is serious doubt that this is, in fact, the case. Instead,
>>>>>> the study authors deduced that their research unequivocally means
>>>>>> that the officially presented narrative that human activity is
>>>>>> causing a detrimental CO2 increase on Earth’s climate is merely a
>>>>>> hypothesis rather than a substantiated reality.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The study, published in Science Direct in March 2024, confirms
>>>>>> that the warming effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is
>>>>>> naturally limited, with the limit having been reached decades ago.
>>>>>> The study also confirms what climatologist Dr. Judith Curry has
>>>>>> stated, which is that the “manufactured consensus of scientists at
>>>>>> the request of policymakers” regarding climate change is all a
>>>>>> ruse to push an agenda that has nothing to do with climate change.
>>>>>> She insists that “Earth has survived far bigger insults that what
>>>>>> human beings are doing.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In a 2022 interview, Curry remarked that the basic facts of the
>>>>>> climate situation are clear—global temperatures have been warming,
>>>>>> humans emit CO2 into the atmosphere, and CO2 has an infrared
>>>>>> emission spectra that, overall, acts to warm the planet. However,
>>>>>> after that, there is much disagreement over the most consequential
>>>>>> issues propagated to fuel the climate change narrative, such as
>>>>>> how much of the warming has been caused by humans and how
>>>>>> significant is human-caused warming relative to solar-variability,
>>>>>> ocean circulation patterns, and so on?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why are politically active scientists exaggerating the truth for
>>>>>> political objectives? Many are now certain that, like the COVID-19
>>>>>> pandemic, the massive climate change scheme is about greed, power,
>>>>>> and control. Curry, Professor Emeritus and former chair of the
>>>>>> School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute
>>>>>> of Technology, has become known as an outspoken scientist who
>>>>>> doubts the “scientific consensus” on climate change.
>>>>>> Unsurprisingly, akin to the doctors who dared speak up about the
>>>>>> deadly mRNA COVID-19 shots, Curry was “academically, pretty much
>>>>>> finished off” and “essentially unhirable.” But that has not
>>>>>> stopped her from speaking up. When asked how far from reality the
>>>>>> picture of doom and gloom painted by those pushing the climate
>>>>>> agenda really is, Curry stated:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> “It’s very far from gloom and doom. People are being sued left and
>>>>>> right over bad weather. Governments, oil companies, and everything
>>>>>> because they’re not doing enough.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> People who think that they can control the climate… It’s just a
>>>>>> pipe dream. Even if we went to net zero, we would barely notice.
>>>>>> It would be hard to detect any change in the climate. The climate
>>>>>> is going to do what the climate’s going to do. And there’s a lot
>>>>>> of inertia in the system.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If the carbon dioxide that we’ve put in is as important, as bad as
>>>>>> some people seem to think, those effects are going to be with us
>>>>>> for a very, very long time. And stopping now isn’t going to change
>>>>>> that trajectory very much.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, we must look forward and try to understand what’s happened.
>>>>>> But thinking that we’re going to control the climate by going to
>>>>>> net zero very quickly is not good.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Curry remarked that even when you look more recently at the
>>>>>> weather in the United States, for example, it was much worse in
>>>>>> the 1930s by any measure than it is now. When you look at the
>>>>>> data, she insists that period was inundated with forest fires,
>>>>>> droughts, heat waves, and hurricanes. It makes no sense to rapidly
>>>>>> revamp our entire energy infrastructure to rely on wind turbines
>>>>>> and solar energy, which require a massive land and water footprint.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> According to Curry, the most significant danger is if “we do
>>>>>> really stupid stuff like destroy our energy infrastructure before
>>>>>> we have something better to replace it with.” She believes the
>>>>>> biggest climate risk right now is a so-called transition risk, the
>>>>>> risk of rapidly getting rid of fossil fuels. Dr. Curry is right.
>>>>>> Even if society transitions to all wind and solar, massive amounts
>>>>>> of fossil fuels will be needed to do all the mining, establish the
>>>>>> supply chains, transport, and everything else. So, in the near
>>>>>> term, even if the plan is to use all renewable wind and solar
>>>>>> energy, we will need large amounts of fossil fuels to get there.
>>>>>> “People just repeat these mantras without any thought,” Curry
>>>>>> said, adding, “It’s not a good place.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And now, following Dr. Curry’s sound advice and insight, we have
>>>>>> the Science Direct study reaffirming the madness bestowed upon
>>>>>> humanity by a despicable cohort of greedy souls. Conducted by
>>>>>> researchers from the Institute of Optoelectronics, Military
>>>>>> University of Technology in Warsaw, Poland, the study authors
>>>>>> found that even if we dug up all the world’s coal, extracted all
>>>>>> the world’s oil, and burned it in one giant pyre, the CO2
>>>>>> emissions from that endeavor would not heat up planet Earth.
>>>>>> Indeed, this is because carbon dioxide does not cause the Earth to
>>>>>> warm up indefinitely.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As reported by Slay News, much like a sponge, the Earth’s
>>>>>> atmosphere can only hold so much, meaning that carbon dioxide
>>>>>> cannot increase temperatures anymore since the saturation point
>>>>>> was reached a long time ago. The study uses a hypothetical concept
>>>>>> of a fire inside a greenhouse consistently emitting heat. The
>>>>>> glass walls and ceiling can contain only so much heat before
>>>>>> emitting it outside. CO2 in the atmosphere is very similar in that
>>>>>> it can act as a “greenhouse” gas, but all the CO2 together can
>>>>>> only contain so much heat, much like the hypothetical greenhouse.
>>>>>> The CO2 Coalition agrees with this conclusion as well. Thus,
>>>>>> amidst all the fearmongering around climate change—and the
>>>>>> knowledge that many things, including changes in solar activity
>>>>>> heavily influence Earth’s weather—Dr. Curry believes even if the
>>>>>> Earth is warming, it is not a dangerous thing, commenting:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> “This whole issue of “dangerous” is the weakest part of the whole
>>>>>> argument. What is dangerous? Everybody has a different idea of
>>>>>> what’s good. The only harm from warming is rising sea levels. And
>>>>>> that’s a slow creep unless something catastrophic happens, say, to
>>>>>> the West Antarctic ice sheet. And if something catastrophic
>>>>>> happens there, that’s as likely to be associated with under-ice
>>>>>> volcanoes as it is to be with global warming.”
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, hopefully Trump will leave all the crazy climate agreements
>>>>> like he did last time, which is good for the US! =)
>>>>
>>>> I am 100% CERTAIN OF THAT!
>>>>
>>>> Oooh rah!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Horay! Horay for the king! It will be wonderful to see the tears of
>>> greta and other socialists once he does it! =D
>>
>> Greta is such a consummate rich, spoiled brat phony.
>>
>>> On the other hand gretas new hobby is anti-semitism, so maybe she is
>>> busy in some concentration camp in the middle east? Would not
>>> surprise me.
>>
>> This is the thing with being part of a grievance-driven political
>> identity, when one dragon is slayed, or refuses to play, on to another
>> one they must go.
>>
>> That's why our Dems are constantly creating new sub-minorities to
>> "help out".
>>
>> And the prior ones get discarded (as blacks have been) so the new
>> slaves are made to feel "special".
>>
>> It's a rancidly hubric game.
>
> It is an inhuman and revolting game that strips every participant of
> their dignity and soul.

And somehow they manage to simultaneously transmit arrogance,
self-satisfaction, and approbation at the rest of us while doing so.

Like watching a cuttlefish fast cycle through its predatory camo.

https://youtu.be/rbDzVzBsbGM

A vastly superior creature to humans, imho.