On Sun, 24 Nov 2024, clams casino wrote:

> On 11/24/2024 3:37 AM, D wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 23 Nov 2024, clams casino wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/23/2024 2:43 PM, D wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 23 Nov 2024, Coogan's Bluff wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>>>> As if universities are the entire world.
>>>>>
>>>>> where do their students/leaders migrate off to?
>>>>>
>>>>>> As we know, the conflicts
>>>>>> in academia are so bitter because the stakes are so small.
>>>>>
>>>>> You really are one of the dumbest cunts I have ever seen!
>>>>>
>>>>> Peer grant herding and the climate change hoax  - learn!
>>>>>
>>>>> https://thehighwire.com/editorial/new-peer-reviewed-study-co2-has-zero-impact-on-climate-change/
>>>>>
>>>>> A powerful peer-reviewed scientific study delivers substantial evidence
>>>>> that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the atmosphere have zero impact
>>>>> on the Earth’s global temperatures. The study concludes that even though
>>>>> most publications attempt to depict a catastrophic future for our planet
>>>>> due to an increase in CO2, there is serious doubt that this is, in fact,
>>>>> the case. Instead, the study authors deduced that their research
>>>>> unequivocally means that the officially presented narrative that human
>>>>> activity is causing a detrimental CO2 increase on Earth’s climate is
>>>>> merely a hypothesis rather than a substantiated reality.
>>>>>
>>>>> The study, published in Science Direct in March 2024, confirms that the
>>>>> warming effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is naturally limited,
>>>>> with the limit having been reached decades ago. The study also confirms
>>>>> what climatologist Dr. Judith Curry has stated, which is that the
>>>>> “manufactured consensus of scientists at the request of policymakers”
>>>>> regarding climate change is all a ruse to push an agenda that has
>>>>> nothing to do with climate change. She insists that “Earth has survived
>>>>> far bigger insults that what human beings are doing.”
>>>>>
>>>>> In a 2022 interview, Curry remarked that the basic facts of the climate
>>>>> situation are clear—global temperatures have been warming, humans emit
>>>>> CO2 into the atmosphere, and CO2 has an infrared emission spectra that,
>>>>> overall, acts to warm the planet. However, after that, there is much
>>>>> disagreement over the most consequential issues propagated to fuel the
>>>>> climate change narrative, such as how much of the warming has been
>>>>> caused by humans and how significant is human-caused warming relative to
>>>>> solar-variability, ocean circulation patterns, and so on?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are politically active scientists exaggerating the truth for
>>>>> political objectives? Many are now certain that, like the COVID-19
>>>>> pandemic, the massive climate change scheme is about greed, power, and
>>>>> control. Curry, Professor Emeritus and former chair of the School of
>>>>> Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology,
>>>>> has become known as an outspoken scientist who doubts the “scientific
>>>>> consensus” on climate change. Unsurprisingly, akin to the doctors who
>>>>> dared speak up about the deadly mRNA COVID-19 shots, Curry was
>>>>> “academically, pretty much finished off” and “essentially unhirable.”
>>>>> But that has not stopped her from speaking up. When asked how far from
>>>>> reality the picture of doom and gloom painted by those pushing the
>>>>> climate agenda really is, Curry stated:
>>>>>
>>>>> “It’s very far from gloom and doom. People are being sued left and right
>>>>> over bad weather. Governments, oil companies, and everything because
>>>>> they’re not doing enough.
>>>>>
>>>>> People who think that they can control the climate… It’s just a pipe
>>>>> dream. Even if we went to net zero, we would barely notice. It would be
>>>>> hard to detect any change in the climate. The climate is going to do
>>>>> what the climate’s going to do. And there’s a lot of inertia in the
>>>>> system.
>>>>>
>>>>> If the carbon dioxide that we’ve put in is as important, as bad as some
>>>>> people seem to think, those effects are going to be with us for a very,
>>>>> very long time. And stopping now isn’t going to change that trajectory
>>>>> very much.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, we must look forward and try to understand what’s happened. But
>>>>> thinking that we’re going to control the climate by going to net zero
>>>>> very quickly is not good.”
>>>>>
>>>>> Curry remarked that even when you look more recently at the weather in
>>>>> the United States, for example, it was much worse in the 1930s by any
>>>>> measure than it is now. When you look at the data, she insists that
>>>>> period was inundated with forest fires, droughts, heat waves, and
>>>>> hurricanes. It makes no sense to rapidly revamp our entire energy
>>>>> infrastructure to rely on wind turbines and solar energy, which require
>>>>> a massive land and water footprint.
>>>>>
>>>>> According to Curry, the most significant danger is if “we do really
>>>>> stupid stuff like destroy our energy infrastructure before we have
>>>>> something better to replace it with.” She believes the biggest climate
>>>>> risk right now is a so-called transition risk, the risk of rapidly
>>>>> getting rid of fossil fuels. Dr. Curry is right. Even if society
>>>>> transitions to all wind and solar, massive amounts of fossil fuels will
>>>>> be needed to do all the mining, establish the supply chains, transport,
>>>>> and everything else. So, in the near term, even if the plan is to use
>>>>> all renewable wind and solar energy, we will need large amounts of
>>>>> fossil fuels to get there. “People just repeat these mantras without any
>>>>> thought,” Curry said, adding, “It’s not a good place.”
>>>>>
>>>>> And now, following Dr. Curry’s sound advice and insight, we have the
>>>>> Science Direct study reaffirming the madness bestowed upon humanity by a
>>>>> despicable cohort of greedy souls. Conducted by researchers from the
>>>>> Institute of Optoelectronics, Military University of Technology in
>>>>> Warsaw, Poland, the study authors found that even if we dug up all the
>>>>> world’s coal, extracted all the world’s oil, and burned it in one giant
>>>>> pyre, the CO2 emissions from that endeavor would not heat up planet
>>>>> Earth. Indeed, this is because carbon dioxide does not cause the Earth
>>>>> to warm up indefinitely.
>>>>>
>>>>> As reported by Slay News, much like a sponge, the Earth’s atmosphere can
>>>>> only hold so much, meaning that carbon dioxide cannot increase
>>>>> temperatures anymore since the saturation point was reached a long time
>>>>> ago. The study uses a hypothetical concept of a fire inside a greenhouse
>>>>> consistently emitting heat. The glass walls and ceiling can contain only
>>>>> so much heat before emitting it outside. CO2 in the atmosphere is very
>>>>> similar in that it can act as a “greenhouse” gas, but all the CO2
>>>>> together can only contain so much heat, much like the hypothetical
>>>>> greenhouse. The CO2 Coalition agrees with this conclusion as well. Thus,
>>>>> amidst all the fearmongering around climate change—and the knowledge
>>>>> that many things, including changes in solar activity heavily influence
>>>>> Earth’s weather—Dr. Curry believes even if the Earth is warming, it is
>>>>> not a dangerous thing, commenting:
>>>>>
>>>>> “This whole issue of “dangerous” is the weakest part of the whole
>>>>> argument. What is dangerous? Everybody has a different idea of what’s
>>>>> good. The only harm from warming is rising sea levels. And that’s a slow
>>>>> creep unless something catastrophic happens, say, to the West Antarctic
>>>>> ice sheet. And if something catastrophic happens there, that’s as likely
>>>>> to be associated with under-ice volcanoes as it is to be with global
>>>>> warming.”
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, hopefully Trump will leave all the crazy climate agreements like he
>>>> did last time, which is good for the US! =)
>>>
>>> I am 100% CERTAIN OF THAT!
>>>
>>> Oooh rah!
>>>
>>
>> Horay! Horay for the king! It will be wonderful to see the tears of greta
>> and other socialists once he does it! =D
>
> Greta is such a consummate rich, spoiled brat phony.
>
>> On the other hand gretas new hobby is anti-semitism, so maybe she is busy
>> in some concentration camp in the middle east? Would not surprise me.
>
> This is the thing with being part of a grievance-driven political identity,
> when one dragon is slayed, or refuses to play, on to another one they must
> go.
>
> That's why our Dems are constantly creating new sub-minorities to "help out".
>
> And the prior ones get discarded (as blacks have been) so the new slaves are
> made to feel "special".
>
> It's a rancidly hubric game.

It is an inhuman and revolting game that strips every participant of their
dignity and soul.