On 11/24/2024 3:37 AM, D wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2024, clams casino wrote:
>
>> On 11/23/2024 2:43 PM, D wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, 23 Nov 2024, Coogan's Bluff wrote:
>>>
>>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>>> As if universities are the entire world.
>>>>
>>>> where do their students/leaders migrate off to?
>>>>
>>>>> As we know, the conflicts
>>>>> in academia are so bitter because the stakes are so small.
>>>>
>>>> You really are one of the dumbest cunts I have ever seen!
>>>>
>>>> Peer grant herding and the climate change hoax  - learn!
>>>>
>>>> https://thehighwire.com/editorial/new-peer-reviewed-study-co2-has-zero-impact-on-climate-change/
>>>>
>>>> A powerful peer-reviewed scientific study delivers substantial
>>>> evidence that carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the atmosphere have
>>>> zero impact on the Earth’s global temperatures. The study concludes
>>>> that even though most publications attempt to depict a catastrophic
>>>> future for our planet due to an increase in CO2, there is serious
>>>> doubt that this is, in fact, the case. Instead, the study authors
>>>> deduced that their research unequivocally means that the officially
>>>> presented narrative that human activity is causing a detrimental CO2
>>>> increase on Earth’s climate is merely a hypothesis rather than a
>>>> substantiated reality.
>>>>
>>>> The study, published in Science Direct in March 2024, confirms that
>>>> the warming effect of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is naturally
>>>> limited, with the limit having been reached decades ago. The study
>>>> also confirms what climatologist Dr. Judith Curry has stated, which
>>>> is that the “manufactured consensus of scientists at the request of
>>>> policymakers” regarding climate change is all a ruse to push an
>>>> agenda that has nothing to do with climate change. She insists that
>>>> “Earth has survived far bigger insults that what human beings are
>>>> doing.”
>>>>
>>>> In a 2022 interview, Curry remarked that the basic facts of the
>>>> climate situation are clear—global temperatures have been warming,
>>>> humans emit CO2 into the atmosphere, and CO2 has an infrared
>>>> emission spectra that, overall, acts to warm the planet. However,
>>>> after that, there is much disagreement over the most consequential
>>>> issues propagated to fuel the climate change narrative, such as how
>>>> much of the warming has been caused by humans and how significant is
>>>> human-caused warming relative to solar-variability, ocean
>>>> circulation patterns, and so on?
>>>>
>>>> Why are politically active scientists exaggerating the truth for
>>>> political objectives? Many are now certain that, like the COVID-19
>>>> pandemic, the massive climate change scheme is about greed, power,
>>>> and control. Curry, Professor Emeritus and former chair of the
>>>> School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of
>>>> Technology, has become known as an outspoken scientist who doubts
>>>> the “scientific consensus” on climate change. Unsurprisingly, akin
>>>> to the doctors who dared speak up about the deadly mRNA COVID-19
>>>> shots, Curry was “academically, pretty much finished off” and
>>>> “essentially unhirable.” But that has not stopped her from speaking
>>>> up. When asked how far from reality the picture of doom and gloom
>>>> painted by those pushing the climate agenda really is, Curry stated:
>>>>
>>>> “It’s very far from gloom and doom. People are being sued left and
>>>> right over bad weather. Governments, oil companies, and everything
>>>> because they’re not doing enough.
>>>>
>>>> People who think that they can control the climate… It’s just a pipe
>>>> dream. Even if we went to net zero, we would barely notice. It would
>>>> be hard to detect any change in the climate. The climate is going to
>>>> do what the climate’s going to do. And there’s a lot of inertia in
>>>> the system.
>>>>
>>>> If the carbon dioxide that we’ve put in is as important, as bad as
>>>> some people seem to think, those effects are going to be with us for
>>>> a very, very long time. And stopping now isn’t going to change that
>>>> trajectory very much.
>>>>
>>>> So, we must look forward and try to understand what’s happened. But
>>>> thinking that we’re going to control the climate by going to net
>>>> zero very quickly is not good.”
>>>>
>>>> Curry remarked that even when you look more recently at the weather
>>>> in the United States, for example, it was much worse in the 1930s by
>>>> any measure than it is now. When you look at the data, she insists
>>>> that period was inundated with forest fires, droughts, heat waves,
>>>> and hurricanes. It makes no sense to rapidly revamp our entire
>>>> energy infrastructure to rely on wind turbines and solar energy,
>>>> which require a massive land and water footprint.
>>>>
>>>> According to Curry, the most significant danger is if “we do really
>>>> stupid stuff like destroy our energy infrastructure before we have
>>>> something better to replace it with.” She believes the biggest
>>>> climate risk right now is a so-called transition risk, the risk of
>>>> rapidly getting rid of fossil fuels. Dr. Curry is right. Even if
>>>> society transitions to all wind and solar, massive amounts of fossil
>>>> fuels will be needed to do all the mining, establish the supply
>>>> chains, transport, and everything else. So, in the near term, even
>>>> if the plan is to use all renewable wind and solar energy, we will
>>>> need large amounts of fossil fuels to get there. “People just repeat
>>>> these mantras without any thought,” Curry said, adding, “It’s not a
>>>> good place.”
>>>>
>>>> And now, following Dr. Curry’s sound advice and insight, we have the
>>>> Science Direct study reaffirming the madness bestowed upon humanity
>>>> by a despicable cohort of greedy souls. Conducted by researchers
>>>> from the Institute of Optoelectronics, Military University of
>>>> Technology in Warsaw, Poland, the study authors found that even if
>>>> we dug up all the world’s coal, extracted all the world’s oil, and
>>>> burned it in one giant pyre, the CO2 emissions from that endeavor
>>>> would not heat up planet Earth. Indeed, this is because carbon
>>>> dioxide does not cause the Earth to warm up indefinitely.
>>>>
>>>> As reported by Slay News, much like a sponge, the Earth’s atmosphere
>>>> can only hold so much, meaning that carbon dioxide cannot increase
>>>> temperatures anymore since the saturation point was reached a long
>>>> time ago. The study uses a hypothetical concept of a fire inside a
>>>> greenhouse consistently emitting heat. The glass walls and ceiling
>>>> can contain only so much heat before emitting it outside. CO2 in the
>>>> atmosphere is very similar in that it can act as a “greenhouse” gas,
>>>> but all the CO2 together can only contain so much heat, much like
>>>> the hypothetical greenhouse. The CO2 Coalition agrees with this
>>>> conclusion as well. Thus, amidst all the fearmongering around
>>>> climate change—and the knowledge that many things, including changes
>>>> in solar activity heavily influence Earth’s weather—Dr. Curry
>>>> believes even if the Earth is warming, it is not a dangerous thing,
>>>> commenting:
>>>>
>>>> “This whole issue of “dangerous” is the weakest part of the whole
>>>> argument. What is dangerous? Everybody has a different idea of
>>>> what’s good. The only harm from warming is rising sea levels. And
>>>> that’s a slow creep unless something catastrophic happens, say, to
>>>> the West Antarctic ice sheet. And if something catastrophic happens
>>>> there, that’s as likely to be associated with under-ice volcanoes as
>>>> it is to be with global warming.”
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, hopefully Trump will leave all the crazy climate agreements
>>> like he did last time, which is good for the US! =)
>>
>> I am 100% CERTAIN OF THAT!
>>
>> Oooh rah!
>>
>
> Horay! Horay for the king! It will be wonderful to see the tears of
> greta and other socialists once he does it! =D

Greta is such a consummate rich, spoiled brat phony.

> On the other hand gretas new hobby is anti-semitism, so maybe she is
> busy in some concentration camp in the middle east? Would not surprise me.

This is the thing with being part of a grievance-driven political
identity, when one dragon is slayed, or refuses to play, on to another
one they must go.

That's why our Dems are constantly creating new sub-minorities to "help
out".

And the prior ones get discarded (as blacks have been) so the new slaves
are made to feel "special".

It's a rancidly hubric game.