![]() |
News from da outaworlds |
mail files register groups login |
Message-ID: |
Physics things could also arise from being able to do math on the aleph numbers of the MWI and unitary MWI, like: spin-polarized lighting at dwellings or modifying the worlds most frequently occuring protein, rubisco, to have some slightly adjusted quantum effects. Or, noting magnets synchronize spin, sleep in a big magnet, not necessarily to simultaneously orient spins, perhaps to cause them to have a frequently reoccuring beneficial characteristic, or even different spins at different brain regions (note spintronics and spin chemical catalysis exist, so modifying atomic spin at the brain while you sleep, varying at different brain areas, could actually have an effect on well being and possibly wellness) Perhaps a spin polarized nucleus accumbens feels even better from daily stimulation.
(unitary MWI: does it permit modification; JY appears to make a sentient, purposed effort to modify the past; perhaps at JY’s amount of capability the belief is there that change is possible; JY utilized time-spanning techniques, which Ithinkof as a paranormal technology, so a person positioned to use a time machine who is smart enough to use it believes change is possible; notably JY also described alternative versions of earth to me, even one without an internet has describable presence of actuality in some sense; that supports a variety of universes, but could be without relevance to the physics based MWI)
Even without the geometricization, any mathematics that supports the generation of fractals using operations with or on aleph numbers could reveal a regime of predictable, semipredictable, or themed order at infinities which might also be called nonfinities (although nonfinity might mean something more encompassing of something like unitary MWI, which might be outside of, kind of bigger than, planck-length/voxel notions of infinite things that could happen at 2019AD concepts like planck length voxels and infinite analog-direction ray photons).
There might even be a statistics of a nonfinite distribution where the fractal equation treatment of the aleph numbers causes sufficient repetition, or varied repetion, of things to have bayesian effects, that is possibly the generation of “artificial priors”, or “traversable area tendencies”, to be used bayesianly, to better predict things that are more likely to occur even at a nonfinite distribution.
You could mathematically, possibly with a computer or AI as well as human thought, seek out anisotropies, that is find clusters of effect, with the math, then look for them, at a nonfinite (some various versions of infinite) distribution. Using Bayesian effects at fractal versions of aleph number formulas could be a way of finding anisotropies, that is: possibly actual nameable things, some of which might have matter or time duration, with math. This could be off-earth, like the aleph bayesian fractal thing predicts that at the “a big universe has near identical matter and energy repeats” idea I read about at Scientific American, that there is a distribution of how near the big area repeats are to each other, and sometimes at a nonfinite distribution they are very near and even overlap, even if not that often, With aleph number statistics equations, physicists could search the observable universe, at whatever extent the observations they technologically make occur, for numerically predictable “big area” near-location overlaps and then find some. People that lived at the statistically likely infrequent big area overlaps might be less than a light year from their duplicate planets and duplicate selves. They could communicate with light.
Finding and predicting anisotropies at a nonfinite distribution, possibly with MWI aware and optimizing value based actions, could also be at different size regimes like , and,although I have no reason to think it would work: visualize a fern, what if using minute energy furling or unfurling the eentsiest frond caused all the self-similar fronds to furlor unfurl. Mechanisms that do something like the frondmotion effect could be described mathematically, then the nonfinite MWI distribution math software screened or a human-conceptually realizes ways, to find, at either the existing pre-branch universe, or MWI branch groups or trees that when considered together sequentially, have producible anisotropic concentrations that do the fern frond motion effect. That would be finding new areas of eentsy-change-> large beneficial effect to heighten the happiness and well being at human and other sentience’ at a larger amount or proportion of MWI universes; amplification at human existence as well asthe sciences like physics.
With MWI functional mathematics that can find anisotropies at a nonfinite distribution, software, or also possibly humans, could chart a course through different anisotropic clusters that promote well being at particular durations. metaphorically humans could go from Santa Barbara to Malibu, wheras without the technology they might have gone from vancouver to stockholm.
Thinking on the eentsy fern frond that adjust the entire fern: perhaps such a thing could even be physically constructed a little like an amplifying pantograph, although gear ratio energies come to mind, although there could be nifty springs; an optical version seems very possible as the energy required to furl/unfurl the littlest frond is eentsy with photons; relatedto optical: A CCD or photomultiplier tube seems like an optical near eentsy unfurl and unfurl technology; also this seems to differ mildly from op amps and transistors and ladders of diode voltage doublers connected in networks. Noting that a quantity of these eentsy unfurler-like things already exist, finding new instances of them at math that is used to guide people, and find new things, at the MWI creates new capabilities of benefit amplification, and possibly new technologyizable physics, chemistry, biology, and popular everyday object technologies.
It seems like at 2019AD a human would be part of the realization and application, but the MWI math software might note a doubling of anisotropic durable areas when data velocities go up ten times. The human could then think, “yay benefitting people and all of the possible MWI futures (branches), I will think of a way to transmit data that is ten times faster, noting the aleph number math being functional at equation software says there are much larger numbers of beneficial anisotropies produced at a large majority of MWI universes; pleasantly Inotice this would also be beneficial at my branch universe.”
The math might be used to look at networks, and transport of all objects, and might predict it would find an anisotropy span and duration improvement that could also be an optimality increaser at motor vehicles; if everybody had two vehicles, they would use the more optimal one, increasing system optimality and individual benefit, the equations of nonfinite MWI distributions qauntify this as about one third”
The human might then think of an idea like: suggest that giving away your car be extensively advertised. The MWI effect of more people getting complimentary vehicles could cause the better of two or more vehicles to actually be utilized, thus improving the experience of driving and being beneficial to the environment. It is majority upside as people, even with advertising, are unlikely to give away their only vehicle, but at least some people would then have the more optimal two vehicles.
Functional mathematics of MWI guidance have benefit.
This could also generate new technologies with like: a person or group thought the image of Doug Mackenzie at the new canadian coin’s image was a drag, so we made some MWI universes, or branch generation technologies, that are toroidal 3 dimensional aleph-equivalent, thus have a non-MWI gap in the middle, reducing the quantity of universes that are without our preferred image of maple syrup on the canadian coin.
Enumerating MWI and figuring out what I as a human, that is a person, one of a group of people, to ethically do based on the possibility that MWI is true: At this moment I do not even know if, noting the outcomes of throwing a spoon in the air, the spoon landing right side up, upside down, or standing up vertically, might each be/are all nonfinite, so the spoon landing vertical, possibly being nonfinite at a quantity of universes happens just as much as the other two. Geometricization of aleph numbers to make nonfinite distributions (like distributions of effect at, and producing of branch universes) adressablle with equations andthentechnologyizable addresses which areas of anisotropy favor vertical spoons.
It is possible that many 20th century AD observation sort of finds itself in a homogenous stretch (anistropic concentration or cluster) at what is actually a nonfinite equiweighted distribution (somewhere at the MWI distribution, or other nonfinite distributions, there are a few million spoon landing vertical events, consecutively) so perhaps a geometric expansion restatement of math on aleph numbers might bring comprehendability of MWI effects of actual human actions to humans; people could produce pre-branch universe benefit (pre branch universe: the universe a 20th century AD person would think of as “where they live”) as well as all the MWI branch universes
Bunching of tendencies at a nonfinite or noticeably big, MWI or unitary MWI: Anisotropic distributions (bunching) of outcomes; If something is nonfinite (infinite) and you representit with a number, then it will have nonfinite number or repetitions of the number 300 in a row. Also you would find areas at the digit length that treated as ascii numerals, said anything anyone ever previously said.
Using the word Bunch as a way of saying mathematical region of anisotropy, among the anisotropies, possible chronologically durable anisotropy as well as width of span of effect are described as bunch, like something bunched up so it is concentrated and more prominent than the background. You would also find anisotropic bunches of things that follow from each other with math word:logic, and areas where any math word:logic setup would be resolved/answered with a nonsequitor. So there could be bunch unexpectedness. At a nonfinite distribution bunches could make more bunches happen; I perceive there were hints that MWI is responsive to the components and makeup of any pre-branched universe. I perceive they think unitary MWI stands outside directable variation.
Viewing a bunch generating more bunches with a describable system: So at a branch-ajustable MWI two quantum events next to each other could cause a tropism, sustained tropisms accumulate, then there is a bunch, and the bunch directs the local area effects at that “region” of a nonfinite (or very big) distribution, creating more bunches. Bunches causing other bucnhes accumulate, and although this is more a math thing than a spatial computer program thing, it reminds me of automata like “life”
Aside from matter, Bunches could form standing waves of quantum event resolutions (or resolvability) that reinforce and concentrate, like, if I observe an atom, does the atom next to it have greater quantum resolutionability as it is next to an atom with realized charge and location (Using anAFM to look at a distal atom on a long alkane; do you get the entire molecule quantum observed, resolved, and behavior/potential-constrained, or just that partial length of the alkane before where the electron-distribution field change becomes nondistinguishablefrom background); does an observation cascade, thinking, is there a technology way to cascade, also, naturally occuring quantum resolution cascades, thus making it possible to resolve more things sequentially,partially automatically? It may be beneficial to create technology where one quantum resolving observation heightens, or makes more efficient, the quantum resolvability of neighboring things. That thing where you have partially preobserved the neighbors along with resolving the actual thing you look at could benefit the technology of quantum superobservers.
At the AFM of an alkane, perhaps just viewing the distal parts causes the whole length of the the thing to be quantum observed/resolved. Yet, computationally and engineering niftily, it is possible that advancing just an atom at a time along the length of the alkane, while eventually resolving/observing the entire molecule might computationally or mathmatically take n steps more, so there could be an algorithm to most efficiently quantum observe and resolve a superposed or quantum thus-far nondetermined thing. An algorithm like that could be part of a superobserver. Also, thinking computer science there is also a least-efficient sampling method; as a beneficial technology that would keep the systemsuperposed the longest duration while providing little chunks ofinformation. I donot know muchabotu quantum computers but it is possible the computer science of lowest velocity sort, or most steps to cause a quantum observer based resolution, that is characterization,of an atom or quantum system, could have technology value: causing quantum superposition at quantum computers to be less tweaked and of greater duration.
Previously described but not at this page, a superobserver is a thing, that when it observes something, has greater quantum resolution, collapse of superposition of the wave function, than a human produces. Noting the DQCE supports the effect of an actual human looking at something to change a quantum event, which then changes an optical path, I perceive that it is well known that a IC photosensor could look at something with UV light, resolving it while my gaze would have no effect. As described previously, but not on this page, a superobserver might be an 8 trillion element array or a higher amount from continuing technology development, (8 trillion elements is 1 TB flashdrive technology), where each of the array elements is capable of an observation. When that array looks at a gas or an atom or possibly even a person-graspable macroscopic blob of superposed matter, or possibly even something larger, (I read of a scientist who says big interstellar objects are nondeterminate). It, the superobserver, is vastly more effective at observing than I am; at a computer or robot it is fast about gazing on new and recent things, possibly eventhingsin my projected travel path; it observings them into quantum resolution before I as a human even notice them; as a superobserver it quantum resolves, kind of creates the world around me ahead of my actual participation; Beneficial AI and software that directs a superobserver could actually Make a more optimal reality for the humans.
So it is then also possible to concentrate and array, like a 3d array the quantum resolvabillity heightening effect that standing waves of resolutionness, or even concentrated,possibly like standingwaves of probability zones of: likelyto be observed;
Standing waves, or some other concentration effect, of likeliness of observation and of “area/emission/presence linked observation that heightens observability ease and strength” that increase and structure resolution of quantum superposition can be utilized as building modules: producing things like standing waves, mirrors and solitons functional as elements and effecting and circuitizing resolvability or proneness to observability. It is even possible to think of catalytic observability, I looked at does, it happens to; or something like a CCD amplifier of guided quantum resolution. Possibly this heightened controllable quantum resolvability at many items comes from one actual observation, or at nonobserver versions of quantum mechanics, possibly one energy transition (electron raising and photon emission) causing a bunch of things near it, or otherwise linked to it, (also linked but not near: quantum entangled photons) to be much more likely to quantum resolve, perhaps at things where it was”not their electron and not their photon”.
At a 2019 AD quantum computer, can you look at one electron out of a multiatom system and still have the superposed qubits be functional and unresolved; do they become more likely to resolve from viewing just one electron?
[[Crude and clueless: If you have a transparent doped tin oxide IC camera chip, and a laser passes through it, do the few photons that the camera chip absorbs cause the transmitting photons to be more emphatically particlely or wavey at a double slit experiment; the P/W output still goes/comes from the laser-illuminated experiment structure, it is just that the math and statistics of resolvability go way up from the one of many pre-observation. Doubtful,yet at this moment it seems like it couldbethat way. At high school physics lab the little laser lines might actually be different. If so, you could use less energy or fewer observations, or possibly function more rapidly with part-of-the-group-observed systems priming things to be extra observable;
At a molecule like a long alkane with a halogen on each distal part, if you use an AFM (atomic force microscope) to look at one of the halogens, the electron HOMO/LUMO thing immanentizes/is resolved, yet it seems like quantum resolvability, from observation, as the differences of local electron field strength’s variation could be non distinguishable from chance just a few carbon atoms away, causing quantum resolution to change as a gradual gradient across the length of the alkane, possibly meaning the other halogen atom is quantum unresolved,and it is still superposed. Some macromolecules are described as macroscopic objects: but at a rubber tire, which I read can be thought of as a macromolecule, it seems like shining a laserpointer on one part of the tire does not photoelectrical-effect-ize the entirity of the thing, although perhaps it does.
]]
Some quantum effect resolutions have durable chronological characteristics. I think spin polarized gases last like 15 minutes, so I perceive that it is 15 minutes before the system is so stochastic you have a renewed opportunity for an observer effect to be possible, I perceive. So noting some quantum resolvables have a 15 minute interval, and I perceive some are photon-quick, can a person make a technology out of it? Like you observe polarization of the spin polarized gas 9that you polarized with a different laser or a magnet), which keeps its quantum spin resolution for 15 minutes which causes all the 15 minutes of new lasers you are illuminating it with or sending through it to possibly have photons that function differently, perhaps be more observable, or less observable. Photons do interact with gases, chlorine gas is green, so it is possible spin polarized hydrogen has a “color” at some nonvisible spectral area for the laser to interact at with it.
Perhaps a laser reflected off of a mirror made of spin polarized metal/metal freshly spin polarized with another laser or a big magnet, has some novel optical characteristic I do not know the name of that, is likely already well studied; the thing is, I perceive I read about re-emission of photons from an electron-field was what made a metal mirror work, so if the electrons that make up the field are polarized, is the mirror different as to its effects on a laser; does it change the laser’s characteristics?
If you see the laser bounce off the all spin-up mirror do you then know, have made an observation that the laser will then have some different characteristic? reflecting a laser off a spin polarized mirror have you partially preobserved it, possibly changing other things about its observability, resolution, like spatial resolution, or energy distribution?
Can you heighten laser resolution and detectability at actual applications this way? I think they use lasers sometimes at biochemistry applications. If the resolution goes up with preobservation/preloading of observedness, then you could use eentsier lasers to illuminate tinier things. That benefits making computers and biomedical applications and research. Also there could be integrated circuit production benefits from laser photons that had higher, tighter spectral envelope, tighter spatial resolution, and presensitized to heightened absorption and energizing of what the photons landed on.
It is possible partially preobserved photons or photon systems could increase the amount of data that can be transmitted at optical data distribution like the internet; also pre partially observed, or observed system linked (spin polarized gas or spin-homogenous mirror surfaces are some versions of loading a laserbeam with extra regularness from something kind of like pre-actual detector light characterization. A semiconductor version would be more optimal for data communications; possibly sending the laser through a IC fab style tin oxide or other transparent conductor camera/light sensor could observe some of the photons, possibly causing the others to be easier/more sensitively/with tighter or more digital characteristics be quantum resolvable/detectable; Note this is mostly a technology application of a technology that partially preobserves to immanentize quantum resolution thing, it is different than polarization.
Lasers like those sky-optic lasers that show/characterize atomospheric wiggle so computer canadjust the telescope could benefit from superresolving lasers.
As a technology partially preobserved photons and lasers could be a new kind of sees through things machine or microscope. Actually, a glow from flashlight fingers might be more information-rich if the laser doing the illuminating had some preloaded tendency to react/respond to the scattering and reflection a certain way.
Thinking about the effect of preobserving photons, and thus possibly other wave things, like electrons, Like at water waves at the ocean, if I look at just a couple of them, then I have a statistical image of almost all the waves’ direction and the energy distribution of what other waves are lapping up on shore; my perception is that the quantum physics people might think or say that at an actual quantum system the other waves get their distribution of energies, wavelengths and velocities structurally bounded from the eentsy-sample observation. I am absent clue though.
Thenthereis the other version, couldyou doantinodal,precludesobservationthings? COuld you create “fuzz” that madeobservation noncollasping? (atnonobserver quantummechanics, evenifyou illuminate the entire laboratory with the emissions spectrum of the atom you are raisinganelectron up a level,and producing a emissions line photon with, it happens evenif the scientist cannot seeit)
Noting quantumcomputers, it is possibletouse technology to get a multi superposed state, multiatom system to resolve; I donot knnowif the multiple qubits as seperate circuits are polled sequentially,orifthereis a retina-like parallel simulteneity of quantum resolution; it seemslike wuantumcomputersexistence maysupport one observation,of say anatom, causing the quantum unresolved atomsnearit to be easier to resolve.
AT Quoraitsays that a field exists, but observing it causes anelectron to be resolved. Stacking up fields to cause something, even withoutan observation is previously described, the thing is that canyou do stuff to fields without observingthem, like put a flashdrive quantum tunneling container next to a field, then perhaps the thing tunneled,perhapsitwasabsenttunneling, soif you pileupabunchofpotentialtunnelings yet neverobservethem, then have a particle (possibly a previuslyobservedparticle) or something traverse the area with the bigpile of potential tunnelings at it, does anythinghappentothe particle? Like if the particle veers, that causes causes quantum resolution of some tunneling that previouslyoccured? I havenoidea.
also with variations on duration and physical span. Therecouldbe a bunch of Noting the possible equal nonfinitude of spoons landing vertically compared with the nonfinitudes of bowlside up there could be “areas” of MWI or unitary MWI where bunches, possibly novel, unimagined bunches, Cause or are linked to anisotropic areas of a nonfinite distribution where all the spoons land vertically. It is possible that physics is a bunch, just part or region of the stuff-that-could-happen at a nonfinite distribution at MWI or unitary MWI, but things near the physics bunch tend to quantum collapse or resolve around the fields, as well as possibly cumulative tropisms, around the bunch (avoiding metaphor, but scrounging around for similars: standing waves cause equispaced blob concentrations - the standing waves cause thing concentration: having numerous (concentration of) neighbor atoms causes entrained efffects like lasability, quantum duration, or matter concentration).
Are bunches compatible with mathematics: The thing is if you say there are fields, basically entrainment, from the bunch, which is an various-sized anistropy with, among some possible characteristics being being span or duration areas at a the nonfinite distribution, having fields might cease to utilize/be functional at utilizing or being describable with the math of probability that says there are bunches of anisotropy at a nonfinite distribution.
So anisotropy actually apparently seems to be a part of the equation, possibly though, the mechanical view of the universe (all linked causes,and even thr schroedinger equations direction of outcome pointing to the MWI) is just a bunch, and that other bunches amongst the MWI distribution have different bunches and bunch-guided themes from different bunches, and these bunches do not yet have english or math or physics names. If MWI, even unitary MWI is viewed as a distribution, the nonfinite number of times the spoon lands vertically could be bunched together, and the things that cause or propagate something like coherent bunching “there” mght be different than what humans experienced during the 20th century. For example, sppons could always land vertically, at nonfinite quantities, if something absent recognition of existing carefully stood them on end. a thought is something like, kuroko (“in kabuki, the kuroko serve many of the same purposes as running crew. They move scenery and props on stage, aiding in scene changes and costume changes. They will also often play the role of animals, will-o-the-wisps, or other roles which are played not by an actor in full costume, but by holding a prop…in order to imply that they are invisible and not part of the action onstage”) People are near that now. Humans making AI could possibly easily have don’t-bother-to-see-it assistance and what during the 20th century would ahev been stage effects from AI guidance and matter technologies, among them robots yet also nanotechnology. Humans are very near having AI and nanotech causing all their spoons land vertically.
Thinking about making stuff, with possible novel physical span or durability, and keeping Dave’s “schoedinger’s neurons: idea around, Are there things that are absent being able to be quantum-resolved? Does making those things have technological utility? Some things do this easily for intervals of time, like a created photon traveling a path prior to measuring is unresolved, but are there physical objects, or even just groups of atoms where it is non-possible from a logic/set theory perspective to have them be quantum resolvable? a few types might be things that aren’t there that could be: the 1-(tunneling probability number) area where the thing is absent quantum tunneling, another could be analog things at actual physics: the electron or atom considered as having spherical analog coordinates around it, and a photon emission,or even a nuclear nucleus fissioning event, that causes an analog, nonfinite possible path; an analog thing might be nonpossible to “accurately” observe or resolve.
I read at quora that electrons are what you see when you observe a field, so if you stack a lot of unobserved fields on each other, technologically like with big lasers or something, could you heighten field concentration such that it produces somethingthat obtrudes onto consciousness. like for those versions of quantum mechanics that value a human observer, the field does something so loud, if a human exists, anywhere, they notice and observe it? That is like a novel logic area of observation-doing-something to me.
Ithinkthe universe was created.
, another could be things that are absent possibility of detection. then there might be things that are near absent being able tobe quantum resolved like neutrinos, perhaps there is a neutrino type which is so noninteracting that it would take longer than the “20th century physics universe” was expected to exist, or require more matter than the 20th century universe could containto detect/interact with; another possibility isvariationson the wave function of the universe, as a wave function ithas a wavelength,sojust naming a wavelength twice as big might be nondetectable,at least at some resolution (I have heard of 1/4 wave antennas so even multiplications of the size/wavelength of the universal wave functionmight be detectable)
(interestingly, people have already noticed that there are apparently different actual things, evenif they happen to be shaped concentrations of homogenous stuff, like electrons, or that thing I read on quora that said there are fields and electrons just happen to occur when you look at a field)
(although non coherent could also be possible, it is just that universe groups where the spoon lands vertical a few million times in a row, seem, at least at first, to suggest coherent bunch-effect)
I have not read about questions 20th century humans, even the most intelligent humans, cannot comprehend, and might only be able to even ask with software that generates the questions; Like I can say “it seems possible to figure out geometry expansions of aleph numbers”, but there are simple core ideas I simply cannot think of. Software, and thus possibly AI can read, and then work on questions that go beyond human, that is people’s ability to ask, and then the answers could be used to benefit humans, that is people, and make technologies.
that are . (can MWI technology experiments purposefully generate aleph number equations that make an upward parabola vase or sphere? How about a gideon’s trumpet?)
anA size of unitary MWI electron bandwidth emission (color) event could generate a mathematically nonfinite, possibly a particular size namable amount of infinity like aleph one to be generated from a 360 sphere version of an electron to emitted.
The 360 photon emissions event and its photon re-emission causes MWI, possibly also unitary MWI, to have an all possible photons at all possible electron locations, at all the enumerable electrons size of the unitary MWI
Refutations of infinity or sizes of infinity could then affect the struture of aleph numbers and thus MWI unity at some simplest possible thing like set theory or Functors (or forgetful-functor system/structures ) statments of the math of unitary MWI.
Also technologically testable could be at thing, or another thing which is if every letter at the schoedinger equation are some, but not others of those letters, is the schoedinger equation still supported. nonfinite letters would lmit the size, or restate the unitary MWI.
Another infinity is the evaluation of a an arbitrarily large numers of math equation at a sentient gazer, or notably a macroscopic gazer big enough to view a data-meessage with sperable bits or equation letters. “hey, give looking over this equation once at a computer base, or humna equation generator makes nonfinite math for a sentieince to solve.
technology thing: one neuron, possibly with a physiociculating metalloporphyrin, is illuminated with a quantum linked photon; the illumination effects the electron distribution of the atom, which bends/effects a neuron’s chemistry, which then affects a retinal-cytes output, which is then an an actual observed photon.
The pleasant thing about his is that a cognitive being or nonconscious computer could use any of tested neuron component of Dave “scrhoedinger’s neuron” theory, different nonfinite unitary MRI (I think), restructuralizations of infinite/nonfite amounts, standing quantum wave, to build a hedonisting imperative causing and creating and apllied technology
Also, notably, I have already experienced a time technology, suggesting that sentiences at a unity-or less amount sized amount could build a hedonistic imperative an nonfinite lifespan number of preexisting MWI universes;
IF size
Could those areas of the brain that respond to transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS) be particularly easy to reach with photonic stimulkation of photostimulatable drugs because of the near area of the tisuue and the less tissue that the photons have to travel through?
Better plywood and particle board: Wikipedia describes ural-formaldehyde glue at particle board and plywood; It is possible that what might be thriftier, although I have no idea if it would be better as a material is to genetically engineer or breed wood plants like some trees to make much more sap or resin, then find a free radical catalysts that turns the new larger amount of resin to a structurally functional glue
Math: “a computation theoretical schemata for an online recursive self feeding automata which can be by way of tail recursion, which can be implemented using iteration” reminds me of how to get cellular automata based data compression to work better; Figuring out seed and tree that generates an uncompressed data object could work better if you feed the tree branches or their string generation [][][][][][] (2d data as list) back into the [][][][][] (2d data as list). so basically, grow a tree, find relationships or equations that say something about what generates what, then use those equations, as CA rules with the tree refeeding its own base seed/technique. Primitive thinking on my part and a mathematician could do better, but sometimes there are things where if you have two values sometimes there are rules/equations about what can be found between them.
So if the data is a phone book, an equation or rule set, possibly with the “ that narrows the possible tree output to things with lots of vowels or spaces between 3-10 letter strings could make a first approxination that is structurally near accurate (and with vowel frequency, statistically nearer the actual goal data-string) to sequentially refine. That would reduce the amount of CPU cycles to compress the big data string initially.
Then again, Generating a “near miss” to the data string CPU-cyle-cheaply then adjusting the seed and CA ruleset to upgrade the “near miss” to the actual specific data string to be compressed might take just as much, more, or less computation. I do not have any idea, it is just an alternative approach. So the idea is that tree-refeedback could generate the “near miss” with a test of “looks, structurally, like the data string” then just make lesser, easier to compute changes to the seed, possibly using “recursive self feeding automata” once the CA generates a structural match to the goal string, like lots of vowels or regular space characters.
This structure first, then refine approach could also decrease the number of CA tree growth increments, that is it would generate the tree with less CPU cycles. Also, it seems possible to find different rulesets and seeds and number of tree generations that produce the same goal data string. More than one way to produce the goal string. Among the multiple ways found, one could be fastest to expand (decompress) from having fewest tree-line generations.
At an automata, “Each variable in the CFG [context free grammar] corresponds to a language; this language is recursively defined using other variables. We hence look upon each variable as a module; and define modules that accept words by calling other modules recursively” http://msl.cs.uiuc.edu/~btovar/cs475/hw/recaut.pdf , reminds me of producing a durable island of meaning , where the island is the CFG, (made up of automata output and little-part stored and produced values); causes me to think, “it, the grammar, and the language, is the drift or gist of a bunch of functions and numbers that comprise it”. Perhaps a normal distribution, graphic, generating eqaution, and part/area isolating equations are a drift or gist that creates a language that says “normal distribution” Then again, that is kind of being overly broad as it seems to just restate, “equations can describe a system”. My loose reinterpretation of the word “language” at the quote is kind of just saying once you have equations of the normal distribution you can then recombine these equations as a sort of words to make completely new statements about a normal distribution (possibly also doing some exciting grammar thing where what comes first and next and possibly what/where is a verb is, has a definite pattern, possibly a CFG generated grammar). Gee it just sounds like “math says things, and the math you use to say things can be reordered to say new things and make new descriptions” which seems very very well known.
At the same paper it says, “Intuitively, if q′∈δm(q, m′), then Xq can generate a word of the form xy where x is accepted using a call to module m and y is accepted from the state q” (perhaps it is saying: where a new generated thing meets a previous stored state) The line from that paper seems like an actual parts that work and do something, actual usable math, way of saying: we generated a CFG where a variable can be placed next to another variable in a relationship. That is it generates something like an axiom of grammar, while simultaneously building things from previous stored state.
The automata that generates the context free grammer, that might be doing specific instances of, “math says things, and the math you use to say things can be reordered to say new things and make new descriptions” has one line of a multi-line description that says, “Intuitively, a transition within a module is simulated by generating the letter on the transition and generating a variable that stands for the language generated from the next state.” OK, that is exciting to read, and seems like the english explanation of the “Intuitively, if q′∈δm(q, m′)…(more text)” descriptive/defining actual math or logic-like language of the paper. It might sort of say: one part of one thing, and another previous-like thing, together make up a durable grammar (way of saying things) which is sompletely different than the interpretation at the start of this paragraph, but I will leave the first part of the paragraph as it is becuase it is also entertaining.
Dave Pearce: “look upon each variable as a module; and define modules that accept words by calling other modules recursively” The possibility of an automata generated context free grammar (CFG) functioning at systems that extend the chronological length/duration of an uncollapsed quantum state, (possibly looked upon as a math-way where CFGs could produce time intervals that cause quantum events to require different amounts (more or less amount) of observation (some interpretations of quantum mechanics) or different amounts of atom-to-atom interactions sufficient to decohere a quantum system (some other interpretations of quantum mechanics). Dave Pearce refers to some person who says the duration length of an unresolved quantum superposition is “femtoseconds” at an aqueaous chemical system like a neuron. Some technological instantiation of Context free grammars, technologically implemented as automata, could change the femtoseconds to seconds, as well as possibly effect the atom, molecule, or even tissue-span (like the actual physical dimensions/AMU) of the superposed amount of stuff. For Dave, bigger tissue/cyte/neurons being superposed for longer intervals eases scientific and technological research, where I perceive Dave wants to find the source of the source of conscious awareness (at his published at Quora version he uses “schoedinger’s neurons” as a quick memorable description); as well as new consciousness technology production.
Thinking of Dave’s “schedinger’s neurons” idea: noting that an automata context free grammer could effect the chronological length or physical span of unresolved quantum events (UQE), what would you make it out of, and niftily, entertainingly, math and science-wise can you search for multi-cyte feedbacks, procedures, automata or basically computer programs at existing proteins, cytes, and tissues, including neurons?
If they find, or technologically make, a UQE chronological interval extending automata/math relationship at proteins/cytes/tissues it could be possible to change that or link that to the naturally occuring “dwell time” of neurons, parts of neurons (like synapses and dendrites); the longer the interval of dwell time it is possible the experiments are easier and the technologies are easier to produce; perhaps neurons, as per Dave’s idea, might have some surveyable systemic relationships that could be restated as automata, or other computer-program like assemblages, and these assemblages could define the quantum unresolved time interval that these UQE last. If you find the automata/program at the neuron or its parts then you could use that computer science/math sourced expected interval to make experiments out of. 100 ns experiments, 1 second experiments, 24 hours experiments, all based on the math-predicted length of UQE at the CNS or neurons.
also, what about really long computer programs or automata; could could these generate nonfinite lengths, or even multiday lengths of UQE at protein/tissues/cytes like neurons? If Dave’s “schoedinger’s neurons” Idea has value, then finding UQE systems with intervals of hours or days could redefine thought, pre-thought, something like the feel of the day. Beyond the causual psychological observation that the mind flits from thing to thing with metaphor:variaed lighting (a metaphor for feeling or sustained nonconscious perspective): Thoughts change all the time at less than 1 second intervals while often tilted with a kind of gestalt of multi-hour (apparently) noncognitive baseline of a perspective like cheerful.
New drugs or CNS structures that change the intervals produced with CFGs or other means of effecting the UQE duration at the sentient being could create new forms of sentience. Supersentience could possibly go with more actual isness from technologizations like genetic modification, drugs, implants, or cytological sized computation technology objects. (a greater or different amount of isness contrasts with just feeling more isness from say, stimulant drugs or LSD).
From Dave’s perspective, a sentience that compares p-zombies with 2018 AD humans, it is possible supersentiences based on UQE duration modifying CFG proteins/cytes (like neurons)/tissues would create beings that think we are like p-zombies in comparison with a supersentience’ amount of beneficial isness. Also this could have sentient AI technology applications. As previously described, things with varied and lengthy UQE, per Dave’s theory, are one more possible way to generate consciousness. Noting the standing wave solitons, mirrors, and atom-parabola imitation-atoms formable from energy; also noting that these can generate things like standing waves, and that standing waves of custom frequency or duration, could have different, varying, possibly longer UQE intervals, engineerable to imitate and improve upon those human sentience producing effects at Dave’s “schroedinger’s neurons” idea, could be a new technological way to create artifical sentience, awareness, isness.
I saw a parabola as well as a circle of atoms making a nodal wave additioneffect: a new blob of charge, and the new cofocally-sourced blob of charge can act like a charged atom. Atom parabola focus chemistry: atoms as waves that can focalize; the foci imitate the charge of atoms, thus can effect the energetics of physical molecules, this could link or implement a parabola-focus energy workalike functioning as a halogen or other atom, to physically, chemically modify the reactivity of an actual molecule, the shape of a protein or the activity of a neuron). This could possibly be created at things other than neural tissue creating new technologies as well as modifications to existing technologies like semiconductors. Another possibility is that I perceive wikipedia says time crystals (plural rotating energy states as non-static least-energy configuations of atom groups) have been physically produced; these looping systems could loop through CFG UQE chronological and physical span adjusting automata, producing large, durable, technologically customizable UQE, which Dave thinks are causative of sentience. So a time crystal chemistry could be a non neural source of sentience to make artificial intelligence from.
Thinking of atom parabolas with an artifical blob that has the charge characteristics of an actual atom without there being an actual atom there: Perhaps imitation carbon, or some nifty, even more plurally-attaching electric charge than carbon variation (say 20 “-“ links per virtual atom), could form polyatomic molecules; like a virtual phenyl, or a virtual dopamine, or a virtual RNA, or new hyperplural carbon-like virtual molecules or, possibly macromolecules. These could be a new kind of organic chemistry because they could do more, new, different things than the existing elements in combination. technologies that build chemical systems, or even possibly artificial intelligence technological generating objects could have even more possible engineerable variations.
Is it possible to produce parabola-like virtual atom cofocalizers at something other than solid matter? Various gases can be spin-polarized, and spin polarized things might exhibit something like magnetic sorting or arrangement; It is just possible that spin-modified laser-zapped gases in a big magnet could produced ordered parabola-like virtual atom generators. A virtual atom environment as widely spaced as a gas could have enhanced chemical activity, and permit more virtual atoms to be next to each other for making virtual atom molecules.
a semi-aqueous virtual atom parabola, or other shape might be producible with something like a lipid layer or bilayer. A regularly spaced grid, with somethinglike metal atoms at it as part of lipid layer or bilayer might be moisture-stable. A laser immobilization field could possibly cause a big million times million or billion times billion array of metal atoms at a lipid layer or lipid bilayer grid of molecules to be constrained as to place and position. That would make a large-surface area virtual atom technological structure.
Water has a possibility of being arrangeable into virtual-atom producing structures or shapes. A laser immobilization field could possibly cause a big million times million or billion times billion array of water molecules to be constrained as to place and position, they would then be placed in parabolas or other shapes to produce virtual atoms to make things with and do chemistry.
Ladder or staircase polymers: The sides of the ladder, or triladder, or quadro-ladder each have an atom on them, then the atoms cofocalize to make an assemblage of virtual atoms that can be used at an actual produced technology. The custom shapes of proteins, as well as their predictable mechanism-like motions, notably some I have seen at cytological biological systems, could be used to make virtual atom assemblages and even do things like swing them together or hold them at adjustable lengths from each other to make things, that is, technology objects. Things like virtual atom technology proteins could go along with circular-gap graphene stacked sheets as things that can produce stuff.
Photovoltaic or semiconductor or custom band gap material made from cofocalized virtual atoms: can you change the bandgap of an existing semiconductor if you project a virtual atom onto it, or its surface? Another possibility is making an entire new semiconductor completely out of virtual atoms Notably, at images I have seen, virtual atoms are produced with near 20-40 actual atoms at a parabola; 40 atoms is many many orders of magnitudes less atoms to make something out of, a possible path to eentsier computer and artificial intelligence parts. Could virtual atom cofocalization produced semiconductors have greater stability than actual element-made semiconductor crystals, beneficially effecting structural and performance variability and possibly making them warmth nondegrading? Perhaps an atom parabola or other shape attached to a graphene grid, possibly a monolayer, or a stack of monolayers, could have greater warmth stability. Also, 40 metal atoms attached to the carbons at graphene might be less warmth-wiggly. One possibility is lithium with its 1 unit of charge, another possibility is deuterium, as the higher mass of the deuterium form of hydrogen, noting hydrogen likes to attach to carbon, like graphene, might be less wiggly as well.
The graphene grid could have big action-spaces or holes in it: So if you think of a graphene grid, with cofocalizing atoms on it having the virtual atom be at a place where the graphene grid had a big, possibly circular, 40 sided circle gap hole, then the virtual atom would be free-floating, and able to be next to other virtual atoms, or even effect other molecules that drift through the 40 sided hole. That produces a custom reaction and building space with virtual atoms. A vertical | virtual-atom polymer could be constructed in a stack of 40 atom hole graphene monolayers.
Obvious to say, but virtual atoms from things like parabolas or other shapes could be effected from externally applied charge or proton movement (protontronic charge) that might make them brighter, less overbearing, or more stationary to benefit reactivity, positional stability, Plasmonics would be a technologically more sophisticated way of doing things with virtual atoms that uses electrons or protons to enhane, improve, and create new effects from virtual atoms.
Could cofocalizing virtual atom producing parabolas or other shapes be produced from phonons or other plasmonic structures at STP? A migrating or standing plasmonic structure that cofocalizes atoms and electrons as waves could make virtual atoms like virtual halogens of virtual carbons that could possibly be electronically or protonically moved around, causing control of the chemistry and electrical characteristics of the virtual atoms. You couldmove stuff around, which could go well with atom-sized manufacturing. Could a plasmonic virtual atom-migrating technological object do nanoassembler activities?
Could a virtual atom sturalized coating or layer on a photovoltaic cause charge optimization to either improve electron migration or photon absorption.. A ladder polymer or graphene coated surface, or something like laser etched, texture of virtual atoms could heighten phovoltaic efficiency. Similarly other things that generate electricity might benefit. Perhaps virtual atoms could affect the magnetic characteristics of a material.
Electrets (things like permanent locational charge materials or polymers) are a known thing, so parabolas-or other shape that generate virtual atoms could be made from electret materials. These could be stronger, more effective, higher reactivity, purposefully optimized reactivity, or notably durable versions of virtual atom technology materials. Perhaps it is possible to populate the surface of graphene, or modify a protein or ladder molecule so it is an electret, then graphene and protein, ladder molecule virtual atom technologies could have higher and durable energy. I do not know where electrets get their energy, I perceive I read that non-zero warmth causes atoms to have electrons above the ground state, so it is possible ambient STP or even cooler could keep the energy up and available at an electret virtual atom technology or chemical effector, even though it was interacting with other atoms or virtual atoms. Than contrasts with piezoelectric plastics and ceramics which, I perceive, happen when molecules or crystals respond to squeeziness or new molecule position to cause bunched up electrons.
If Dave’s theory of “schoedinger’s neurons” has value, or if adjusting the UQE interval or physical span has effects regardless of Dave’s idea, there could even be new drugs that effect the quantum superposition UQE interval of tissues, cytes, like neurons, or proteins. Just as measurable things, perhaps not effect forecast from theory, or with Dave’s idea, these could have new medical effects or modify thoughts arising at a human, that is person, or people’s brains/CNS actual physical brain or at an AI technology object. An MWI active drug.
What happens when you put an electret layer under or on top of a semiconductor? Permanent bias at a transistor?
Easy-trigger custom bandgaps, from partial pre-loading of electrons, (or I suppose things like their tunneling or availability, or blobby HOMO graphic of charge-at-molecule adjustments) at light emitters and photovoltaics? Non-polymer chemical vapor depositable electrets could enhance semiconductor technology.
“DSP circuits, such as finite-impulse-response filters with fixed coefficients, you can build constant-multipliers which multiply by a constant” makes me think there are amazing sort of analog, but possibly digital, IC circuits out there that multiply something with a coefficient. What is a way you could multiply something with (the coefficient) at an IC? I am thinking it is likely a square wave encoded thing that is being multiplied, otherwise you could just use a transistor or op-amp, but the idea of a dedicated multiplier made of semiconductors that is nonlooping, that is not a turing machine, is entertaining. I have no idea how it would work. Maybe if you do something wild like XOR (or some more actual thing) the first three bits you can do predictable doubling or halving, then progressively double or half the number-containing byte-word as fractional diminishing fractions (like 1-1/2 -1/4-1/8 from sequential xoring) to get a new number that is multiplied with an arbitrarily sculpted number that is the coefficient. The sequential XORing, if the coefficient was fized and known, could be a in-semiconductor ladder of sequential XORs (1-1/2-1/4-1/8-1/16 etc) made out of little lines at a semiconductor to create a physical coefficient multiplier of digital data, as compared with a CPU-style turing machine looping thing.
..5B Children’s nootropics: well, they could test the various racetam nootropics on mice to see if any of them live longer from the human “more education causes better healthspan and lifespan” https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-0009.12372 correlations being supported with a control including study on mice. It could be that being nootropic fed your entire life makes you live longer and be healthier; if it works at mice, then that, with the human correlation, and the actual measured lifetime and healthspan of the mice compared to controls could cause the racteams and other nootropics to be a positively additive beneficial variant on: measures of safety; and so recommended as a health, wellness, and cognitive thing for human physiological children to take and do.
Also, the mouse data might vary as to the improved healthspan and longevity with each different nootropic molecule, that would cause certain nootropics to be preferable for human physiological children’s use.
If nootropics make mice weller and longer lived, possibly from the education effect they could use localized versions, like antibody linked, or high AMU polyglycine linked (does not pass the blood brain barrrier) racetam nootropics to concentrate the nootropics outside the CNS,or at specific organs and tissues, to see if the different ones had any different effects on healthspan. It might find organ systems, which when their neurons are more/differently active, work better. That might find wellness or longevity producing nootropic molecules, usable as drugs, which omitting a CNS education effect, still heighten wellness and have longevity effects.
A paper says, “Although it is well established that educational attainment improves health and longevity” https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1468-0009.12372
The beneficial effects of education on longevity and healthspan might be concentratable and increasable with isolating and studying actual education content and education-environment variables like area of education, classes taken, or major, and electives and possibly education style, like homework completed or educational software hours used, as well as things like dorm residence and recreation activities at college and high school, and possibly at younger ages as well.
Pondering the effect of education on younger ages, it is possible that although almost everyone goes to elementary school, that the trends noted at high school students elective activity could produce data on which areas of interest, and their practice, increase longevity and healthspan; it is possible math classes might have high correlations with greater lifespan and healthspan, so perhaps kindergarten could be enriched with logic based on the measurement that studying logic provides lifetime longevity and healthspan benefits at the lifetime of high school and college students. At kindergarten activities like “what things go together, with physical venn diagrams, putting blue and green people and green and blue trees on different venn diagram play boards where one has intersection of people and blue, and another has green and trees, and the kindergarteners being able to point out,possibly with personal entertainment and amusement, things that “can’t make sense” when a set of characteristics or postulates is given first. Lewis Carrol might be on to something with the entertainment and puzzles Alice, of Alicein wonderland pondered.
Just thinking about college majors they might find that Math classes correlate with longevity and healthspan notably when wealth increase from the math’s enabling lucrative majors is compensated for. Similarly, they might find that sociability in college, causing more rememberable occurences of what has been called “the college experience” has correlation to longevity and healthspan when also factor compensated for extroversion. Perhaps living in the dorms and going to a mid range quantity of parties, rather than few parties or lots of parties, is measurably correlatable as physiologically beneficial throughout the lifetime.
If they find school educational and activity things that transfer well from college versions to high school versions, perhaps specific area college healthspan and lifespan benefitting activity correlations could be used to improve high school and junior high school as well as elementary school with study subjects and activities that heighten longevity and healthspan copied from university.
Although occasional spurious correlations at the components of education and school-lifestyle, are math of probability predictable, it is possible area-specific correlations of longevity and healthspan from what things are studied, how much homework is accomplished or the amount of educational software modules that are accomplished, and also social activities that are often linked to educational environments could guide some of people’s voluntary educational activities.
engineering, chemistry, computer ic, computer fab, longevity, longevity technology, treon, treon verdery, physics, lasers, laser, emiconductor, dimension, math, IT, IL, pattern resonance, time travel, chronotechnology, circile, eric the circle, cartoon, healthspan, youthspan, cpi, manufacturing, fiscal, money, software, petroleum, archive at deviantart com user treonsebastia
All technologies, ideas, and inventions of Treon Sebastian Verdery are public domain at JUly 8,2023AD and previously, as well as after that date
Subject | Replies | Author |
![]() By: Joe Mardin on Sun, 23 Jul 2023 | 0 | Joe Mardin |