Trump is still spinning from having the last election stolen from right
under his hapless nose. What kind of loser gets an election stolen from
him? Unfit to lead.

May the best rigger win.

Gravy wrote:
>
> Trump is still spinning from having the last election stolen from right
> under his hapless nose. What kind of loser gets an election stolen from
> him? Unfit to lead.

>What I don't really understand is...

>how is Donald Trump going to be able to
>monitor all these maybe 50,000 voting machines
>from being rigged????

>I don't get it!

>Why even bother ?

>I just don't get it!

vIsn't he better off on a yaght somewhere????

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > Then there is that 'other' voting machine...Smartmatic.
> >
> > Did you know
> > did you know
> > did you know...
> >
> > that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine
> > is...Venezuelan-born????
>
> The fact is...that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine
> is...Venezuelan-born, and also is a ...criminal. He loves bribes!
>
> He makes a great partner for the Democrats, Right?
>
> Bribing him is a piece of cake.
>
> Paying him to rig the machine is 'not a problem', the problem is by how much
> to rig the count?
>
> "It's *how* to do it. These things must be done delicately, or you hurt the spell." -The Wicked Witch of the West
>
> I say follow Maduro path...rigged to 52%.
>
> give the co-founder of Smartmatic a couple of suitcases...
>
> How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024
>
> Let's make it a Netfix special!
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Smartmatic-Dominion-Affidavit-1.txt

DECLARATION OF

I, , hereby state the following:

1.

2. I am an adult of sound mine. All statements in this declaration are
based on my personal knowledge and are true and correct.

3. I am making this statement voluntarily and on my own initiative. I
have not been promised, nor do I expect to receive, anything in exchange
for my testimony and giving this statement. I have no expectation of any
profit or reward and understand that there are those who may seek to
harm me for what I say in this statement. I have not participated in any
political process in the United States, have not supported any candidate
for office in the United States, am not legally permitted to vote in the
United States, and have never attempted to vote in the United States.

4. I want to alert the public and let the world know the truth about the
corruption, manipulation, and lies being committed by a conspiracy of
people and companies intent upon betraying the honest people of the
United States and their legally constituted institutions and fundamental
rights as citizens. This conspiracy began more than a decade ago in
Venezuela and has spread to countries all over the world. It is a
conspiracy to wrongfully gain and keep power and wealth. It involves
political leaders, powerful companies, and other persons whose purpose
is to gain and keep power by changing the free will of the people and
subverting the proper course of governing.

5.

6. Due to my training in special operations and my extensive military
and

- Page 1 of 8

7.

- Senor Cabello was a long-time confederate of President Chavez and
instrumental in his gaining power. In 2002, Senor Cabello had very
briefly taken over the duties of the presidency while Hugo Chavez was
imp1·isoned. Within hours of Senor Cabello taking over the presidency,
Hugo Chavez was released from prison and regained the office of
President. On December 11, 2011, Cabello was installed as the Vice­
President of the United Socialist Party - the party of President Chavez
and became the second most powerful figtn·e in the party after Hugo
Chavez. Cabello was appointed president of the National Assembly in
early 2012 and was re-elected to that post in Januai·y 2013. After Hugo
Chavez's death, Cabello was next in line £01· the presidency of the
country, but he remained president of the National Assembly and yielded
to Nicolas Maduro holding the position of President of Venezuela.

8.

precise and exacting in his instructions in the details about meetings
he wanted, where the meeting was to occ111·, who was to attend, what was
to

9.

- Page 2 of8

sophisticated electronic voting system that permitted the leaders of the
Venezuelan government to manipulate the tabulation of votes for national
and local elections and select the winner of those elections in order to
gain and maintain their power.

10. Importantly, I was a direct witness to the creation and operation of
an electronic voting system in a conspiracy between a company known as
Smartmatic and the leaders of conspiracy with the Venezuelan government.
This conspiracy specifically involved President Hugo Chavez Frias, the
person in charge of the National Electoral Council named Jorge
Rodriguez, and principals, representatives, and personnel from
Smartmatic which included . The
purpose of this conspiracy was to create and operate a voting system
that could change the votes in elections from votes against persons
running the Venezuelan government to votes in their favor in order to
maintain control of the government.

11. In mid-February of 2009, there was a national referendum to change
the Constitution of Venezuela to end term limits forelected officials,
including the President of Venezuela. The referendum passed. This
permitted Hugo Chavez to be re-elected an unlimited number of times.

12. After passage of the referendum, President Chavez instructed me to
make arrangements for him to meet with Jorge Roch-iguez, then President
of the National Electoral Council, and three executives from Smartmatic.
Among the three Smartmatic representatives were

President Chavez had multiple meetings with Rodriguez and the
Smartmatic team at which I was present. In the first of four meetings,
Jorge Rodriguez promoted the idea to create software that would
manipulate elections. Chavez was very excited and made it clear that he
would provide whatever Smartmatic needed. He wanted them immediately to
create a voting system which would ensure that any time anything was
going to be voted on the voting system would guarantee results that
Chavez wanted. Chavez offered Smartmatic many inducements, including
large sums of money, for Smartmatic to create or modify the voting
system so that it would guarantee Chavez would win every election cycle.
Smartmatic's team agreed to create such a system and did so.

13. I arranged and attended tlu·ee more meetings between President
Chavez and the representatives from Smartmatic at which details of the
new

voting system were discussed and agreed upon. For each of these
meetings, I communicated directly with on details of where and when to
meet, where the participants would be picked up and delivered to the
meetings, and what was to be accomplished. At these meetings, the
participants called their project the "Chavez revolution." From that
point on, Chavez never lost any election. In fact, he was able to ensure
wins for himself, his party, Congress persons and mayors from townships.

14. Smartmatic's electoral technology was called "Sistema de Gesti6n
Electoral" (the "Electoral Management System"). Smartmatic was a pioneer
in this area of computing systems. Their system provided for
transmission of voting data over the internet to a computerized central
tabulating center. The voting machines themselves had a digital display,
fingerprint recognition feature to identify the voter, and printed out
the voter's ballot. The voter's thumbprint was linked to a computerized
record of that voter's identity. Smartmatic created and operated the
entire system.

15. Chavez was most insistent that Smartmatic design the system in a way
that the system could change the vote of each voter without being
detected. He wanted the software itself to function in such a manner
that if the voter were to place their thumb print or fingerprint on a
scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter's
name and identity as having voted, but that voter would not tracked to
the changed vote. He made it clear that the system would have to be
setup to not leave any evidence of the changed vote for a specific voter
and that there would be no evidence to show and nothing to contradict
that the name or the fingerprint or thumb print was going with a changed
vote. Smartmatic agreed to create such a system and produced the
software and hardware that accomplished that result for President
Chavez.

16. After the Smartmatic Electoral Management System was put in place, I
closely observed several elections where the results were manipulated
using Smartmatic software. One such election was in December 2006 when
Chavez was running against Rosales. Chavez won with a landslide over
Manuel Rosales - a margin of nearly 6 million votes for Chavez versus
3.7 million for Rosales.

17. On April 14, 2013, I witnessed another Venezuelan national election
in which the Smartmatic Electoral Management System was used to
manipulate and change the results for the person to succeed Hugo Chavez

-- Inside that location was a control room in which there were
multiple digital display screens -TV screens -for results of voting in
each state in Venezuela. The actual voting results were fed into that
room and onto the displays over an internet feed, which was connected to
a sophisticated computer system created by Smartmatic. People in that
room were able to see in "real time" whether the vote that came through
the electronic voting system was in their favor or against them. If one
looked at any particular screen, they could determine that the vote from
any specific area oras a national total was going against either
candidate. Persons controlling the vote tabulation computer had the
ability to change the reporting of votes by moving votes from one
candidate to another by using the Smartmatic software.

18. By two o'clock in the afternoon on that election day Capriles
Radonsky was ahead of Nicolas Maduro by two million votes. When Maduro
and his supporters realized the size of Radonsky's lead they were
worried that they were in a crisis mode and would lose the election. The
Smartmatic machines used for voting in each state were connected to the
internet and reported their information over the internet to the Caracas
control center in real-time. So, the decision was made to reset the
entire system. Maduro's and his supporters ordered the network
controllers to take the internet itself offline in practically all parts
in Venezuela and to change the results.

19. It took the voting system operators approximately two hours to make
the adjustments in the vote from Radonsky to Maduro. Then, when they
turned the internet back on and the on-line reporting was up and running
again, they checked each screen state by state to be certain where they
could see that each vote was changed in favor of Nicholas Maduro. At
that moment the Smartmatic system changed votes that were for Capriles
Radonsky to Maduro. By the time the system operators finish, they had
achieved a convincing, but narrow victory of 200,000 votes for Maduro.

What would happen if
on election day
the machine-reported zero votes for Trump?

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Smartmatic-Dominion-Affidavit-1.txt
>
> DECLARATION OF
>
> I, , hereby state the following:
>
> 1.
>
> 2. I am an adult of sound mine. All statements in this declaration are
> based on my personal knowledge and are true and correct.
>
> 3. I am making this statement voluntarily and on my own initiative. I
> have not been promised, nor do I expect to receive, anything in exchange
> for my testimony and giving this statement. I have no expectation of any
> profit or reward and understand that there are those who may seek to
> harm me for what I say in this statement. I have not participated in any
> political process in the United States, have not supported any candidate
> for office in the United States, am not legally permitted to vote in the
> United States, and have never attempted to vote in the United States.
>
> 4. I want to alert the public and let the world know the truth about the
> corruption, manipulation, and lies being committed by a conspiracy of
> people and companies intent upon betraying the honest people of the
> United States and their legally constituted institutions and fundamental
> rights as citizens. This conspiracy began more than a decade ago in
> Venezuela and has spread to countries all over the world. It is a
> conspiracy to wrongfully gain and keep power and wealth. It involves
> political leaders, powerful companies, and other persons whose purpose
> is to gain and keep power by changing the free will of the people and
> subverting the proper course of governing.
>
> 5.
>
> 6. Due to my training in special operations and my extensive military
> and
>
> - Page 1 of 8
>
> 7.
>
> - Senor Cabello was a long-time confederate of President Chavez and
> instrumental in his gaining power. In 2002, Senor Cabello had very
> briefly taken over the duties of the presidency while Hugo Chavez was
> imp1·isoned. Within hours of Senor Cabello taking over the presidency,
> Hugo Chavez was released from prison and regained the office of
> President. On December 11, 2011, Cabello was installed as the Vice­
> President of the United Socialist Party - the party of President Chavez
> and became the second most powerful figtn·e in the party after Hugo
> Chavez. Cabello was appointed president of the National Assembly in
> early 2012 and was re-elected to that post in Januai·y 2013. After Hugo
> Chavez's death, Cabello was next in line £01· the presidency of the
> country, but he remained president of the National Assembly and yielded
> to Nicolas Maduro holding the position of President of Venezuela.
>
> 8.
>
> precise and exacting in his instructions in the details about meetings
> he wanted, where the meeting was to occ111·, who was to attend, what was
> to
>
> 9.
>
> - Page 2 of8
>
> sophisticated electronic voting system that permitted the leaders of the
> Venezuelan government to manipulate the tabulation of votes for national
> and local elections and select the winner of those elections in order to
> gain and maintain their power.
>
> 10. Importantly, I was a direct witness to the creation and operation of
> an electronic voting system in a conspiracy between a company known as
> Smartmatic and the leaders of conspiracy with the Venezuelan government.
> This conspiracy specifically involved President Hugo Chavez Frias, the
> person in charge of the National Electoral Council named Jorge
> Rodriguez, and principals, representatives, and personnel from
> Smartmatic which included . The
> purpose of this conspiracy was to create and operate a voting system
> that could change the votes in elections from votes against persons
> running the Venezuelan government to votes in their favor in order to
> maintain control of the government.
>
> 11. In mid-February of 2009, there was a national referendum to change
> the Constitution of Venezuela to end term limits forelected officials,
> including the President of Venezuela. The referendum passed. This
> permitted Hugo Chavez to be re-elected an unlimited number of times.
>
> 12. After passage of the referendum, President Chavez instructed me to
> make arrangements for him to meet with Jorge Roch-iguez, then President
> of the National Electoral Council, and three executives from Smartmatic.
> Among the three Smartmatic representatives were
>
> President Chavez had multiple meetings with Rodriguez and the
> Smartmatic team at which I was present. In the first of four meetings,
> Jorge Rodriguez promoted the idea to create software that would
> manipulate elections. Chavez was very excited and made it clear that he
> would provide whatever Smartmatic needed. He wanted them immediately to
> create a voting system which would ensure that any time anything was
> going to be voted on the voting system would guarantee results that
> Chavez wanted. Chavez offered Smartmatic many inducements, including
> large sums of money, for Smartmatic to create or modify the voting
> system so that it would guarantee Chavez would win every election cycle.
> Smartmatic's team agreed to create such a system and did so.
>
> 13. I arranged and attended tlu·ee more meetings between President
> Chavez and the representatives from Smartmatic at which details of the
> new
>
> voting system were discussed and agreed upon. For each of these
> meetings, I communicated directly with on details of where and when to
> meet, where the participants would be picked up and delivered to the
> meetings, and what was to be accomplished. At these meetings, the
> participants called their project the "Chavez revolution." From that
> point on, Chavez never lost any election. In fact, he was able to ensure
> wins for himself, his party, Congress persons and mayors from townships.
>
> 14. Smartmatic's electoral technology was called "Sistema de Gesti6n
> Electoral" (the "Electoral Management System"). Smartmatic was a pioneer
> in this area of computing systems. Their system provided for
> transmission of voting data over the internet to a computerized central
> tabulating center. The voting machines themselves had a digital display,
> fingerprint recognition feature to identify the voter, and printed out
> the voter's ballot. The voter's thumbprint was linked to a computerized
> record of that voter's identity. Smartmatic created and operated the
> entire system.
>
> 15. Chavez was most insistent that Smartmatic design the system in a way
> that the system could change the vote of each voter without being
> detected. He wanted the software itself to function in such a manner
> that if the voter were to place their thumb print or fingerprint on a
> scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter's
> name and identity as having voted, but that voter would not tracked to
> the changed vote. He made it clear that the system would have to be
> setup to not leave any evidence of the changed vote for a specific voter
> and that there would be no evidence to show and nothing to contradict
> that the name or the fingerprint or thumb print was going with a changed
> vote. Smartmatic agreed to create such a system and produced the
> software and hardware that accomplished that result for President
> Chavez.
>
> 16. After the Smartmatic Electoral Management System was put in place, I
> closely observed several elections where the results were manipulated
> using Smartmatic software. One such election was in December 2006 when
> Chavez was running against Rosales. Chavez won with a landslide over
> Manuel Rosales - a margin of nearly 6 million votes for Chavez versus
> 3.7 million for Rosales.
>
> 17. On April 14, 2013, I witnessed another Venezuelan national election
> in which the Smartmatic Electoral Management System was used to
> manipulate and change the results for the person to succeed Hugo Chavez
>
> -- Inside that location was a control room in which there were
> multiple digital display screens -TV screens -for results of voting in
> each state in Venezuela. The actual voting results were fed into that
> room and onto the displays over an internet feed, which was connected to
> a sophisticated computer system created by Smartmatic. People in that
> room were able to see in "real time" whether the vote that came through
> the electronic voting system was in their favor or against them. If one
> looked at any particular screen, they could determine that the vote from
> any specific area oras a national total was going against either
> candidate. Persons controlling the vote tabulation computer had the
> ability to change the reporting of votes by moving votes from one
> candidate to another by using the Smartmatic software.
>
> 18. By two o'clock in the afternoon on that election day Capriles
> Radonsky was ahead of Nicolas Maduro by two million votes. When Maduro
> and his supporters realized the size of Radonsky's lead they were
> worried that they were in a crisis mode and would lose the election. The
> Smartmatic machines used for voting in each state were connected to the
> internet and reported their information over the internet to the Caracas
> control center in real-time. So, the decision was made to reset the
> entire system. Maduro's and his supporters ordered the network
> controllers to take the internet itself offline in practically all parts
> in Venezuela and to change the results.
>
> 19. It took the voting system operators approximately two hours to make
> the adjustments in the vote from Radonsky to Maduro. Then, when they
> turned the internet back on and the on-line reporting was up and running
> again, they checked each screen state by state to be certain where they
> could see that each vote was changed in favor of Nicholas Maduro. At
> that moment the Smartmatic system changed votes that were for Capriles
> Radonsky to Maduro. By the time the system operators finish, they had
> achieved a convincing, but narrow victory of 200,000 votes for Maduro.
>
> 20. After Smartmatic created the voting system President Chavez wanted,
> he exported the software and system all over Latin America. It was sent
> to Bolivia, Nicaragua, Al·gentina, Ecuador, and Chile - countries that
> were in alliance with President Chavez. This was a group of leaders who
> wanted to be able to guarantee they maintained power in their countries.
> ·when Chavez died, Smartmatic was in a position of being the only
>
> company that could guarantee results in Venezuelan elections for the
> party in power.
>
> 21. I want to point out that the software and fundamental design of the
> electronic electoral system and software of Dominion and other election
> tabulating companies relies upon software that is a descendant of the
> Smartmatic Electoral Management System. In short, the Smartmatic
> software is in the DNA of every vote tabulating company's software and
> system.
>
> 22. Dominion is one of three major companies that tabulates votes in the
> United States. Dominion uses the same methods and fundamentally same
> software design for the storage, transfer and computation of voter
> identification data and voting data. Dominion and Smartmatic did
> business together. The software, hardware and system have the same
> fundamental flaws which allow multiple opportunities to corrupt the data
> and mask the process in a way that the average person cannot detect any
> fraud or manipulation. The fact that the voting machine displays a
> voting result that the voter intends and then prints out a paper ballot
> which reflects that change does not matter. It is the software that
> counts the digitized vote and reports the results. The software itself
> is the one that changes the information electronically to the result
> that the operator of the software and vote counting system intends to
> produce that counts. That's how it is done. So the software, the
> software itself configures the vote and voting result -- changing the
> selection made by the voter. The software decides the result regardless
> of what the voter votes.
>
> 23. All of the computer controlled voting tabulation is done in a closed
> environment so that the voter and any observer cannot detect what is
> taking place unless there is a malfunction or other event which causes
> the observer to question the process. I saw first-hand that the
> manipulation and changing of votes can be done in real-time at the
> secret counting center which existed in Caracas, Venezuela. For me it
> was something very surprising and disturbing. I was in awe because I had
> never been present to actually see it occur and I saw it happen. So, I
> learned first­ hand that it doesn't matter what the voter decides or
> what the paper ballot says. It's the software operator and the software
> that decides what counts - not the voter.
>
> 24. If one questions the reliability of my observations, they only have
> to read
>
> which Smartmatic had possession of all the votes and the voting, the
> votes themselves and the voting information at their disposition in
> Venezuela.
>
> -- he was assuring that the voting system implemented or used by
> Smartmatic was completely secure, that it could not be compromised, was
> not able to be altered.
>
> 25. But later, in 2017 when there were elections where Maduro was
> running and elections for legislators in Venezuela, -- and Smartmatic
> broke their secrecy pact with the government of Venezuela. He made a
> public announcement through the media in which he stated that all the
> Smartmatic voting machines used during those elections were totally
> manipulated and they were manipulated by the electoral council of
> Venezuela back then. stated that all of the votes for Nicholas Maduro
> and the other persons running for the legislature were manipulated and
> they actually had lost. So I think that's the greatest proof that the
> fraud can be carried out and will be denied by the software company that
> admitted publicly that Smartmatic had created, used and still uses vote
> counting software that can be manipulated or altered.
>
> 26. I am alarmed because of what is occurring in plain sight during this
> 2020 election for President of the United States. The circumstances and
> events are eerily reminiscent of what happened with Smartmatic software
> electronically changing votes in the 2013 presidential election in
> Venezuela. What happened in the United States was that the vote counting
> was abruptly stopped in five states using Dominion software. At the time
> that vote counting was stopped, Donald Trump was significantly ahead in
> the votes. Then during the weehours of the morning, when there was no
> voting occurring and the vote count reporting was off-line, something
> significantly changed. When the vote reporting resumed the very next
> morning there was a very pronounced change in voting in favor of the
> opposing candidate, Joe Biden.
>
> 27. I have worked in gathering
> information, researching, and working with information technology.
> That's what I know how to do and the special knowledge that I have. Due
> to these recent election events, I contacted a number of reliable and
> intelligent ex-co-workers of mine that are still informants and work
> with the intelligence community. I asked for them to give me information
> that was up-to-date information in as far as how all these businesses
> are acting, what actions they are taking.
>
> I declai·e under penalty of pe1jury that the foregoing is true and
> correct and that this Declai·ation was prepared in Dallas County, State
> of Texas, and executed on November 15, 2020.
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > What I don't really understand is...
> >
> > how is Donald Trump going to be able to
> > monitor all these maybe 50,000 voting machines
> > from being rigged????
> >
> > I don't get it!
> >
> > Why even bother ?
> >
> > I just don't get it!
> >
> > Isn't he better off on a yaght somewhere????
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > Then there is that 'other' voting machine...Smartmatic.
> > > >
> > > > Did you know
> > > > did you know
> > > > did you know...
> > > >
> > > > that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine
> > > > is...Venezuelan-born????
> > >
> > > The fact is...that today's co-founder of Smartmatic Voting Machine
> > > is...Venezuelan-born, and also is a ...criminal. He loves bribes!
> > >
> > > He makes a great partner for the Democrats, Right?
> > >
> > > Bribing him is a piece of cake.
> > >
> > > Paying him to rig the machine is 'not a problem', the problem is by how much
> > > to rig the count?
> > >
> > > "It's *how* to do it. These things must be done delicately, or you hurt the spell." -The Wicked Witch of the West
> > >
> > > I say follow Maduro path...rigged to 52%.
> > >
> > > give the co-founder of Smartmatic a couple of suitcases...
> > >
> > > How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024
> > >
> > > Let's make it a Netfix special!
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

https://apnews.com/article/smartmatic-venezuela-election-voting-machines-9a3e334f149f962be9d982bf4a11dc43

MIAMI (AP) — A federal indictment has charged three current and former executives of Smartmatic in a scheme to pay more than $1 million in bribes to put its voting machines in the Philippines, a setback for a company that has been feuding with allies of Donald Trump over unsubstantiated claims that it manipulated the 2020 U.S. presidential election.

The Justice Department in a statement Thursday said Smartmatic’s Venezuelan-born co-founder Roger Piñate and a colleague at the Boca Raton, Florida-based company funneled bribes to the chairman of the Philippines’ electoral commission through a slush fund created by overcharging for the cost of each voting machine it supplied authorities.

The payments, between 2015 and 2018, were made to obtain business with the Philippines and secure the timely payment for its work, the Justice Department said in a statement, which, like the indictment, does not mention Smartmatic by name.

To hide the corrupt payments to Juan Donato Bautista, the former chairman of the Commission on Elections in the Philippines, the co-conspirators allegedly created a slush fund — codenamed the “Philippines Pot,” according to investigators — and sham loan agreements to justify transfers to bank accounts located in Singapore, Hong Kong, Switzerland, New York and Florida. Nearly $1 million of the illegal payments were used by a family member of Bautista to purchase property in San Francisco.

The investigation of the Smartmatic executives started in 2017, when the wife of Bautista informed investigators in the Philippines that her husband had obtained $20 million in unexplained wealth, some of it in stacks of cash found at their home.

Bautista was arrested last year on a criminal complaint from Miami that accuses him of taking the bribes in exchange for awarding an unnamed company nearly $200 million in contracts to supply tens of thousands of Taiwanese-manufactured voting machines and related services for the 2016 presidential elections. Before his arrest he denied ever taking money from Smartmatic or any other entity. Nonetheless authorities in the Philippines banned Smartmatic from bidding on a contract to provide election technology for the 2025 election.

Smartmatic in a statement said it had placed the two employees on leaves of absence, effective immediately.

“No voter fraud has been alleged and Smartmatic is not indicted,” the company said in a statement. “Voters worldwide must be assured that the elections they participate in are conducted with the utmost integrity and transparency.”

Piñate co-founded Smartmatic more than two decades ago and its initial success is partly attributable to major contracts from the government of Hugo Chavez, an early devotee of electronic voting, in Piñate’s native Venezuela. It has since expanded globally and helped carry out elections in 25 countries, from Argentina to Zambia as well as several European countries.

In 2017, Smartmatic broke all ties with Venezuela when it accused President Nicolas Maduro’s government of manipulating turnout figures in the country’s election for a national constituent assembly. Smartmatic said that the turnout announced by the government was inflated by about 1 million votes.

Piñate, who was also serving as Smartmatic’s president, and Jorge Miguel Vasquez were each charged with one count of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which carry a maximum penalty of five years in prison. Both reside in south Florida. Along with Elie Moreno, a dual citizen of Venezuela and Israel who managed Smartmatic’s relations with the Philippines, they were also charged with several money laundering charges that carry a maximum penalty of 20 years.

Piñate on his LinkedIn profile touts Smartmatic’s corporate motto: “Protecting election integrity is at the core of what we do.”

Smartmatic sued Fox News for airing false claims that software it developed altered the outcome of the 2020 U.S. presidential election. In April, another conservative media outlet, One America News Network, settled with Smartmatic similar allegations for undisclosed terms.

Reportedly funding Smartmatic’s costly defamation suit is LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, who did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the indictment against the Smartmatic executives.

Smartmatic has also sued several Trump allies, including his personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, but the claims against him are on hold while his bankruptcy case plays out.

Fox News earlier tried unsuccessfully to get dismissed out of the case, which also named hosts Maria Bartiromo and Jeanine Pirro and former host Lou Dobbs. An appeals court threw out claims against network parent Fox Corp., but Smartmatic refiled them.

All software accused of altering the outcome of the 2020 U.S. election was developed a decade ago by a U.S. affiliate of Smartmatic.

Fact-checkers at the AP and other outlets have debunked the far-fetched claims. But Trump attorney Sidney Powell nonetheless appeared on Fox News shortly after the election accusing Maduro’s former chief of staff of being the ringleader of what she called a “Cyber Pearl Harbor” involving Smartmatic.

In the 2020 U.S. election, Smartmatic technology was used in a single district: Los Angeles County, California. It also doesn’t have any existing ties to Dominion Voting Systems, a rival that the Trump team has accused of being part of the plot.

Fox countersued under a New York law against lobbing frivolous litigation to try to silence reporting or commentary on public matters. Smartmatic tried in vain to get those counterclaims tossed out.
Image

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica

Antonio Mugica Rivero
Born May 1974
Caracas, Venezuela
Alma mater Universidad Simón Bolívar
Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic

It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
Voting machines!!!!

It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting
machines to never lose an election.

Who counts the votes? Not people. The software counts the votes.

The software is programmed to never lose an election.

Now, who is Roger Pinate? (look him up)

I love loaded dice too! (i play strip dice with girls)

When you tell a girl, "Let's play strip poker!!!!" and she
smiles...you're in like flint! get your marked deck out!!!

of course, she'll get a little angry when she notices all her clothes
are off and yours are still on...

she'll say..."WHAT KIND OF FUCKING CARDS DO YOU GOT???!"

How about dice?

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

The Starmaker wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> <kooksnip>

*PLONK*

--
The very ink with which all history is written is merely fluid prejudice.
-- Mark Twain

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> *PLONK*

Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A
Terrell/Chris Ahlstrom/Intelligent Party and a few dozen other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <emo79jh20rlasuask9094vtlepuu5ui0av@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$dFU1.83026@fx11.ams4> <XnsB1AF52A9CDF3B629555@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <4ln79j914cpespbrssonesbciii33ess3m@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400

Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 15:34:49 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
wrote:

>The Starmaker wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> <kooksnip>
>
>*PLONK*

Yeah. Me too. Anytime I dump my filters he's always automatically one of the
first ones back in.

I like to go into book stores and ask the clerk, "Hello. I'm trying to find a
book called, 'How To Deal With Rejection Without Killing'."

--
#NEVERtrump

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica
>
> Antonio Mugica Rivero
> Born May 1974
> Caracas, Venezuela
> Alma mater Universidad Simón Bolívar
> Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic
>
> It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
> Voting machines!!!!
>
> It was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
>
> Venesula dictator PAID for the design of Dominion and Smartmatic Voting
> machines to never lose an election.
>
> Who counts the votes? Not people. The software counts the votes.
>
> The software is programmed to never lose an election.
>
> Now, who is Roger Pinate? (look him up)

Here is a look up of Roger Pinate/Smartmatic co-founder

Smartmatic co-founder Roger Piñate was charged with foreign corruption and money laundering in Miami federal court Monday, Aug. 12, 2024, related to securing voting machine elections contracts in the Philippines.

Piñate, 49, president of Boca Raton-based Smartmartic, was charged along with Jorge Miguel Vasquez, 62, of Davie, the company’s former vice president of hardware development, who also surrendered on Monday.

Piñate, alongside Venezuelans Antonio Mugica and Alfredo José Anzola, founded Smartmatic in 2000, and gained notoriety after the company was chosen by Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez to replace the country’s voting machines in 2004. The company grew by acquiring the much larger Sequoia Voting Systems in 2006, though the company later announced that it had divested its stake in that company.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article290982400.html

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/four-men-charged-philippine-bribery-and-money-laundering-scheme

https://www.reuters.com/legal/smartmatic-execs-charged-with-bribing-philippine-official-voting-tech-contracts-2024-08-09/

I got a question. WHAT ARE ALL THESE VENESULA SPICS GANGSTERS DOING RUNNING OUR AmERICAN VOTEING MACHINES???

You fuckin let them run it????

WHAT THE FUCK IS THE PROBELM WITH YOU FUCKING PEOPLE????

Throw these Dominion/Smartmatic Voting machines in the garbage where it belongs!!!

I CANNOT BELIEVE YOU LET THESE MADURO GANGSTERS RUN OUR ELECTIONS!!!!

Where can I buy one?

This is better than playing strip poker with a marked deck!

I have another question...are those slot machines in Vegas...rigged????

i think Lays potatoe chips bags are rigged...

Oh, I forgot...go out and vote, your vote counts.

and counts
and counts
and counts
and counts
and counts

One for you, two for me
One for you, two for me
One for you, two for me
One for you, two for me

dats how i count!

teacher always told me.."Starmaker, keep your eyes on your own paper!!"

Did you know those voting machines are connected to the internet and contain modems
so that you can view results from a laptop...

"Okay, add another million votes."

I CANNOT BELIEVE YOU LET THESE MADURO GANGSTERS RUN OUR ELECTIONS!!!!

i know, most of yous look the other way...

You don't see me looking the other way.

Smartmatic co-founder Roger Piñate was charged with foreign corruption and money laundering in Miami federal court Monday, Aug. 12, 2024, related to securing voting machine elections contracts in the Philippines.

Piñate, 49, president of Boca Raton-based Smartmartic, was charged along with Jorge Miguel Vasquez, 62, of Davie, the company’s former vice president of hardware development, who also surrendered on Monday.

Piñate, alongside Venezuelans Antonio Mugica and Alfredo José Anzola, founded Smartmatic in 2000, and gained notoriety after the company was chosen by
Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez to replace the country’s voting machines in 2004. The company grew by acquiring the much larger Sequoia Voting Systems in 2006, though the company later announced that it had divested its stake in that company.

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article290982400.html

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/four-men-charged-philippine-bribery-and-money-laundering-scheme

https://www.reuters.com/legal/smartmatic-execs-charged-with-bribing-philippine-official-voting-tech-contracts-2024-08-09/

Miami, Castro town.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

>
>Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica
>
>Antonio Mugica Rivero
>Born May 1974
>Caracas, Venezuela
>Alma mater Universidad Sim�n Bol�var
>Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic
>
>
>It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
>Voting machines!!!!

Hugo Chavez isn't dead because he rigged to 2020 election to steal it from
Trump. Harris and Biden know people who speak Spanish, not a coincidence
that it's the same language spoken in Venezuela.

The voting machines were all rigged. If they weren't Alex Jones would
have carried on with his life instead of speaking out.

Gary wrote:
>
> >
> >Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one
> >
> >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica
> >
> >Antonio Mugica Rivero
> >Born May 1974
> >Caracas, Venezuela
> >Alma mater Universidad Sim¢n Bol¡var
> >Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic
> >
> >
> >It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
> >Voting machines!!!!
>
> Hugo Chavez isn't dead because he rigged to 2020 election to steal it from
> Trump. Harris and Biden know people who speak Spanish, not a coincidence
> that it's the same language spoken in Venezuela.
>
> The voting machines were all rigged. If they weren't Alex Jones would
> have carried on with his life instead of speaking out.

Well of course all the voting machines are rigged, it was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.

In other words, the foundation of the voting machine was built 'rigged' from the bottom up.

Our Internet was founded and designed 'without security'. If you want a secure Internet, you gonna have to start all over again from scratch. Too late.

That is why Dominion and Smartmatic DON'T want you to look at the source code.

It is too late for them to change the source code.

every line of code is rigged.

There is no other way I will play strip poker. every card is marked for the sole purpose of seeing her naked!

If Maduro can rig it to always win the election...may the best rigger win.

In other words, the person who rigs the best deserves to win.

If Donald Trump doesn't know how to rig an election, he shouldn't be running for president.

God is on the side of the rigger.

I get to see more naked girls with a pack of marked cards.

Isn't that the way life should be?

(i don't know, maybe i leve on a differen planet from yous)

all i know
there is no way
i'm going to play
strip poker with
a bunch of girls
without
a marked deck of cards...
ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY?

Siri, help me with my homework, "How much is 2 plus 2?"

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

The selling point is...
Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
are designed to never lose an election.

There are hundreds of governments
that would pay 'any price' for
a voting machine
designed to never lose an election.

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Gary wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one
> > >
> > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica
> > >
> > >Antonio Mugica Rivero
> > >Born May 1974
> > >Caracas, Venezuela
> > >Alma mater Universidad Sim¢n Bol¡var
> > >Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic
> > >
> > >
> > >It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
> > >Voting machines!!!!
> >
> > Hugo Chavez isn't dead because he rigged to 2020 election to steal it from
> > Trump. Harris and Biden know people who speak Spanish, not a coincidence
> > that it's the same language spoken in Venezuela.
> >
> > The voting machines were all rigged. If they weren't Alex Jones would
> > have carried on with his life instead of speaking out.
>
> Well of course all the voting machines are rigged, it was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
>
> In other words, the foundation of the voting machine was built 'rigged' from the bottom up.
>
> Our Internet was founded and designed 'without security'. If you want a secure Internet, you gonna have to start all over again from scratch. Too late.
>
> That is why Dominion and Smartmatic DON'T want you to look at the source code.
>
> It is too late for them to change the source code.
>
> every line of code is rigged.
>
> There is no other way I will play strip poker. every card is marked for the sole purpose of seeing her naked!
>
> If Maduro can rig it to always win the election...may the best rigger win.
>
> In other words, the person who rigs the best deserves to win.
>
> If Donald Trump doesn't know how to rig an election, he shouldn't be running for president.
>
> God is on the side of the rigger.
>
> I get to see more naked girls with a pack of marked cards.
>
> Isn't that the way life should be?
>
> (i don't know, maybe i leve on a differen planet from yous)
>
> all i know
> there is no way
> i'm going to play
> strip poker with
> a bunch of girls
> without
> a marked deck of cards...
> ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY?
>
> Siri, help me with my homework, "How much is 2 plus 2?"
>
>
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Of course, my Question is
(and i don't know the answer)

Who decides which way the
Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
are rigged for in the United States?

Someone must decide which canidate is suppose to win.

Someone gives the order.

Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?

CIA?

i don't know the answer.

And please, don't tell me the voters decide, that's stupid.

The Truth is...who will count the votes? and How.

In today's world, it is who directs the software how much the count will be.

Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?

CIA?

i don't know the answer.

All I know is that on election day the 'people' wait for the results from a machine.

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> The selling point is...
> Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
> are designed to never lose an election.
>
> There are hundreds of governments
> that would pay 'any price' for
> a voting machine
> designed to never lose an election.
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Gary wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one
> > > >
> > > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica
> > > >
> > > >Antonio Mugica Rivero
> > > >Born May 1974
> > > >Caracas, Venezuela
> > > >Alma mater Universidad Sim¢n Bol¡var
> > > >Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
> > > >Voting machines!!!!
> > >
> > > Hugo Chavez isn't dead because he rigged to 2020 election to steal it from
> > > Trump. Harris and Biden know people who speak Spanish, not a coincidence
> > > that it's the same language spoken in Venezuela.
> > >
> > > The voting machines were all rigged. If they weren't Alex Jones would
> > > have carried on with his life instead of speaking out.
> >
> > Well of course all the voting machines are rigged, it was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
> >
> > In other words, the foundation of the voting machine was built 'rigged' from the bottom up.
> >
> > Our Internet was founded and designed 'without security'. If you want a secure Internet, you gonna have to start all over again from scratch. Too late.
> >
> > That is why Dominion and Smartmatic DON'T want you to look at the source code.
> >
> > It is too late for them to change the source code.
> >
> > every line of code is rigged.
> >
> > There is no other way I will play strip poker. every card is marked for the sole purpose of seeing her naked!
> >
> > If Maduro can rig it to always win the election...may the best rigger win.
> >
> > In other words, the person who rigs the best deserves to win.
> >
> > If Donald Trump doesn't know how to rig an election, he shouldn't be running for president.
> >
> > God is on the side of the rigger.
> >
> > I get to see more naked girls with a pack of marked cards.
> >
> > Isn't that the way life should be?
> >
> > (i don't know, maybe i leve on a differen planet from yous)
> >
> > all i know
> > there is no way
> > i'm going to play
> > strip poker with
> > a bunch of girls
> > without
> > a marked deck of cards...
> > ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY?
> >
> > Siri, help me with my homework, "How much is 2 plus 2?"
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

In Today's news...

Maduro Orders Arrest of Rival to Quell Venezuela Dissent
Bloomberg News
Mon, September 2, 2024, 3:55 PM PDT·2 min read
Venezuela ordered the arrest of presidential candidate Edmundo González, an escalation of the government’s crackdown on dissent in the wake of a disputed election.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/maduro-orders-arrest-rival-quell-225512801.html

That is the playbook the Democrats will follow if Trump loses the election and DARES to disputed the election.

They will arrest him.

Maduro is someone the democracts look up to on

How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024!

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Of course, my Question is
> (and i don't know the answer)
>
> Who decides which way the
> Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
> are rigged for in the United States?
>
> Someone must decide which canidate is suppose to win.
>
> Someone gives the order.
>
> Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?
>
> CIA?
>
> i don't know the answer.
>
> And please, don't tell me the voters decide, that's stupid.
>
> The Truth is...who will count the votes? and How.
>
> In today's world, it is who directs the software how much the count will be.
>
> Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?
>
> CIA?
>
> i don't know the answer.
>
> All I know is that on election day the 'people' wait for the results from a machine.
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > The selling point is...
> > Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
> > are designed to never lose an election.
> >
> > There are hundreds of governments
> > that would pay 'any price' for
> > a voting machine
> > designed to never lose an election.
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > Gary wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >Okay, let's look at the facts...one by one
> > > > >
> > > > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Mugica
> > > > >
> > > > >Antonio Mugica Rivero
> > > > >Born May 1974
> > > > >Caracas, Venezuela
> > > > >Alma mater Universidad Sim¢n Bol¡var
> > > > >Occupation(s) Founder and CEO of Smartmatic
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >It was the Venesula Dictator that...invented Dominion and Smartmatic
> > > > >Voting machines!!!!
> > > >
> > > > Hugo Chavez isn't dead because he rigged to 2020 election to steal it from
> > > > Trump. Harris and Biden know people who speak Spanish, not a coincidence
> > > > that it's the same language spoken in Venezuela.
> > > >
> > > > The voting machines were all rigged. If they weren't Alex Jones would
> > > > have carried on with his life instead of speaking out.
> > >
> > > Well of course all the voting machines are rigged, it was designed 'specifially' to rig elections.
> > >
> > > In other words, the foundation of the voting machine was built 'rigged' from the bottom up.
> > >
> > > Our Internet was founded and designed 'without security'. If you want a secure Internet, you gonna have to start all over again from scratch. Too late.
> > >
> > > That is why Dominion and Smartmatic DON'T want you to look at the source code.
> > >
> > > It is too late for them to change the source code.
> > >
> > > every line of code is rigged.
> > >
> > > There is no other way I will play strip poker. every card is marked for the sole purpose of seeing her naked!
> > >
> > > If Maduro can rig it to always win the election...may the best rigger win.
> > >
> > > In other words, the person who rigs the best deserves to win.
> > >
> > > If Donald Trump doesn't know how to rig an election, he shouldn't be running for president.
> > >
> > > God is on the side of the rigger.
> > >
> > > I get to see more naked girls with a pack of marked cards.
> > >
> > > Isn't that the way life should be?
> > >
> > > (i don't know, maybe i leve on a differen planet from yous)
> > >
> > > all i know
> > > there is no way
> > > i'm going to play
> > > strip poker with
> > > a bunch of girls
> > > without
> > > a marked deck of cards...
> > > ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY?
> > >
> > > Siri, help me with my homework, "How much is 2 plus 2?"
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
> >
> > --
> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

On Sat, 31 Aug 2024 15:34:49 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
wrote:

>The Starmaker wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> <kooksnip>
>
>*PLONK*

Just sent the idiot with he line wrap problem to Plonksville. 14 messages in
the past six hours, deleted. hehe

--
#NEVERtrump

Okay, things are becoming clearer with recent events...

as you already heard there is no X/twitter in Brazil (they turned it off)

China OWNS BRAZIL!

then elon post a picture of Kamala in a red china communist uniform...

Kamala is a Chineese Communists. and her vice president been to
China over 50 times, why?

The Biden family is owned lock, stock and barrel by China.

China OWNS BRAZIL! (China rigged Brazil elections)

Answer: China decides who will win on November in USA elections.

The goal of China is to be Head of a One World Govenment.

(invented by albert einstein)

anybody figured out how to get rid of those chink shows on Netflix?

What i don't understand is why does China keep sending 'women' spies to top jobs in politics ..

who wants to fuck a chink????

Any chinks working in Wahington DC, ...GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!!!!

GO BACK TO FUCKIN CHINA!

Won ton soup? WATDAFUCKISDAT????

fishface

What is the reason why God made people with slanted eyes?? IS HE FUCKING NUTS!!!!

Is that a joke?

Is he playing some kind of joke???

"Look Mom, look at what I just made, fishfaces!"

"Oh great, what are you going to do with the Black paint?"

Maduro should come to the United States and run for President..he knows how to win elections.

HE ALREADY SENT ALL HIS FUCKING PEOPLE HERE!!!!

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Of course, my Question is
> (and i don't know the answer)
>
> Who decides which way the
> Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
> are rigged for in the United States?
>
> Someone must decide which canidate is suppose to win.
>
> Someone gives the order.
>
> Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?
>
> CIA?
>
> i don't know the answer.
>
> And please, don't tell me the voters decide, that's stupid.
>
> The Truth is...who will count the votes? and How.
>
> In today's world, it is who directs the software how much the count will be.
>
> Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?
>
> CIA?
>
> i don't know the answer.
>
> All I know is that on election day the 'people' wait for the results from a machine.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Now if you observed the Democrats...
you will notice they have been following
Maduro's 'playbook'..

get rid of the oponnents by
any means necessary before the
election, then...
RIG the voting machines.

Then shoot anyone who
disputes election results.

Anyone who disputes an election result is a TERROISTS, right?

Domestic terroists.

put an X on their door.

drag them out of the house and shoot them!

Venezuela ordered the arrest of presidential candidate Edmundo González, an escalation of the government’s crackdown on dissent in the wake of a disputed election.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/maduro-orders-arrest-rival-quell-225512801.html

Arrest Trump for disputing an election.

4 more years in jail.

Will the American people revolt then? That remains to be seen...

dats less than 60 days.

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> Okay, things are becoming clearer with recent events...
>
> as you already heard there is no X/twitter in Brazil (they turned it off)
>
> China OWNS BRAZIL!
>
> then elon post a picture of Kamala in a red china communist uniform...
>
> Kamala is a Chineese Communists. and her vice president been to
> China over 50 times, why?
>
> The Biden family is owned lock, stock and barrel by China.
>
> China OWNS BRAZIL! (China rigged Brazil elections)
>
> Answer: China decides who will win on November in USA elections.
>
> The goal of China is to be Head of a One World Govenment.
>
> (invented by albert einstein)
>
> anybody figured out how to get rid of those chink shows on Netflix?
>
> What i don't understand is why does China keep sending 'women' spies to top jobs in politics ..
>
> who wants to fuck a chink????
>
> Any chinks working in Wahington DC, ...GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE!!!!
>
> GO BACK TO FUCKIN CHINA!
>
> Won ton soup? WATDAFUCKISDAT????
>
> fishface
>
> What is the reason why God made people with slanted eyes?? IS HE FUCKING NUTS!!!!
>
> Is that a joke?
>
> Is he playing some kind of joke???
>
> "Look Mom, look at what I just made, fishfaces!"
>
> "Oh great, what are you going to do with the Black paint?"
>
> Maduro should come to the United States and run for President..he knows how to win elections.
>
> HE ALREADY SENT ALL HIS FUCKING PEOPLE HERE!!!!
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> >
> > Of course, my Question is
> > (and i don't know the answer)
> >
> > Who decides which way the
> > Dominion and Smartmatic Voting Machines
> > are rigged for in the United States?
> >
> > Someone must decide which canidate is suppose to win.
> >
> > Someone gives the order.
> >
> > Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?
> >
> > CIA?
> >
> > i don't know the answer.
> >
> > And please, don't tell me the voters decide, that's stupid.
> >
> > The Truth is...who will count the votes? and How.
> >
> > In today's world, it is who directs the software how much the count will be.
> >
> > Is it a politician, a businesman, China?, Russia?
> >
> > CIA?
> >
> > i don't know the answer.
> >
> > All I know is that on election day the 'people' wait for the results from a machine.
>
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> and challenge the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

>
>Venezuela ordered the arrest of presidential candidate Edmundo González, an escalation of the government’s crackdown on dissent in the wake of a disputed election.
>https://www.yahoo.com/news/maduro-orders-arrest-rival-quell-225512801.html

Venezuela's opposition figure flees to Spain to save 'his life'
Venezuelan Leader Who Challenged Strongman in Vote Flees to Spain -
WSJ
Opposition candidate arrives in Spain after fleeing country - BBC
Venezuela's opposition candidate flees to Spain

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=venezuelan+leader+who+challenged+strongman+in+vote+flees+to+spain

I guess the opponent factor got rigged too!

'either leave or fuckin die!'

Putin just throws his opponents out the widow! dat guy has style.

Putin is what is called ...efficient.

Learn to pronounce ef·fi·cient
/?'fiSH?nt/
adjective
(especially of a system or machine) achieving maximum productivity
with minimum wasted effort or expense.

adjective. performing or functioning in the best possible manner with
the least waste of time and effort; having and using requisite
knowledge, skill, and industry..

(the opposite of the democrats)

they sure waste a lot of time and effort in the worst possible manner
trying to get rid of Trump, right?

Notice: no one mentions that Maduro used voting machines to rig the
election. No ONE!

dat means dats their plan too...

>> --
>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>> and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

What about that girl Maria??? Maria Corina Machado? is she next??

The Starmaker wrote:
>
> >
> >Venezuela ordered the arrest of presidential candidate Edmundo González, an escalation of the government’s crackdown on dissent in the wake of a disputed election.
> >https://www.yahoo.com/news/maduro-orders-arrest-rival-quell-225512801.html
>
> Venezuela's opposition figure flees to Spain to save 'his life'
> Venezuelan Leader Who Challenged Strongman in Vote Flees to Spain -
> WSJ
> Opposition candidate arrives in Spain after fleeing country - BBC
> Venezuela's opposition candidate flees to Spain
>
> https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=venezuelan+leader+who+challenged+strongman+in+vote+flees+to+spain
>
> I guess the opponent factor got rigged too!
>
> 'either leave or fuckin die!'
>
> Putin just throws his opponents out the widow! dat guy has style.
>
> Putin is what is called ...efficient.
>
> Learn to pronounce ef·fi·cient
> /?'fiSH?nt/
> adjective
> (especially of a system or machine) achieving maximum productivity
> with minimum wasted effort or expense.
>
> adjective. performing or functioning in the best possible manner with
> the least waste of time and effort; having and using requisite
> knowledge, skill, and industry..
>
> (the opposite of the democrats)
>
> they sure waste a lot of time and effort in the worst possible manner
> trying to get rid of Trump, right?
>
> Notice: no one mentions that Maduro used voting machines to rig the
> election. No ONE!
>
> dat means dats their plan too...
>
> >> --
> >> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> >> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
> >> and challenge the unchallengeable.
> --
> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
> the unchallengeable.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

The Question of course is...
what NUMBER
will the Democrats decide to
rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
Voting Machine????

by 51, or by 52 percent?

No way 100%, or
90's
80's
70's
60's...

(maybe some other country)

it has to be in the low 50's.

wadda you think?

59 sounds too high and
unrealistic.

58 i don't think so

I say, not over 52. and not under 51.

"It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."

The software does the counting.

But it is very important that real people
vote in order for the 'switch' to be made.

Get out your hardhats!
https://news.google.com/search?q=cart%20hardhat%20ballot&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen

there is an election coming...

Zelenskyy is screaming "WHERE ARE ALL MY HITMEN????"

didn't you hear, there is an election coming!

Put all the ballot boxes in Black neighborhoods only, and cart off
all the ballot boxes in White neighborhoods.

I'm telling you..Democrats know all the tricks for

How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024

Learn Grasshopper.

52 sounds kind of high...what do you think?

51 sounds just right.

Not too hot, not too cold..just right.

Goldenlocks knows best.

>
>
>
>The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> Someone once said..."It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."
>>
>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> >
>> > Donald Trump said, ' if Jesus Christ would have counted his votes, he
>> > could have easily won '
>> >
>> > 'If Jesus Christ came down and was the vote counter, I would win'
>> >
>> > But it is the Democrats that do the counting and the Dominion Voting
>> > Machines rigs the count.
>> >
>> > Democrat: "As long as I count the Votes, what are you going to do
>> > about it?"
>> > https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large
>> >
>> > The more things change, the more they remain the same.
>> >
>> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:20:02 -0700, The Starmaker
>> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
>> > >assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >I don't see any other 'option' that they have.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >I don't see any at all.
>> > >
>> > >do you?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker
>> > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >>By now you people should be able to SMELL
>> > >>that the next plan from the democracts is to...
>> > >>*cancel* the election"????
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
>> > >>are now planning to cancel the upcoming
>> > >>2024 election...
>> > >>
>> > >>i think he is having fun.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>What kind of Americans are you?
>> > >>
>> > >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
>> > >>she's on the sixth floor
>> > >>Texas Library.
>> > >>
>> > >>and her daughter is on the phone...
>> > >>"I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>(i don't think nancy can shoot straight)
>> > >>
>> > >>HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>election-rigging at it's best!
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I mean, don't you people think that if
>> > >>> Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
>> > >>> that the next plan from the democracts is to...
>> > >>> *cancel* the election"????
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Are you people not prepared for this??
>> > >>>
>> > >>> That's the plan.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The plan is to *cancel* the election.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> for "technical reasons"...
>> > >>>
>> > >>> one can come up with
>> > >>> thousands of reasons..
>> > >>> like fabricate that all the
>> > >>> voting machines have been tampered with, etc.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> election delayed is election denied.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!
>> > >>>
>> > >>> It's called...'election manipulation'....
>> > >>> interfering with the election process.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> or
>> > >>>
>> > >>> "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker
>> > >>>
>> > >>> throwing your
>> > >>> oppenents
>> > >>> out the window is
>> > >>> 'election manipulation'.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> It is a..coup d'etat.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
>> > >>> > any other hurdles...'they' can always..
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > delay the election day for "technical reasons"..
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > election delayed is election denied.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
>> > >>> > > is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > https://archive.ph/vFYH0
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > Paul Kagame is the MAN!
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > (read about his opponents)
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > https://archive.ph/vFYH0
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
>> > >>> > > his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > one million of them in 90 days!
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > he no need no stinky usb stick.
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > The Starmaker wrote:
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
>> > >>> > > > the same dead people who voted in the last election will
>> > >>> > > > be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Do dead people vote by mail or do they
>> > >>> > > > stuffing ballot boxes at night?
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
>> > >>> > > > there are...
>> > >>> > > > 1.8 million.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > How To Rig an Election, Again!
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
>> > >>> > > > eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
>> > >>> > > > may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
>> > >>> > > > polling place accessibility.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
>> > >>> > > > to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
>> > >>> > > > disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
>> > >>> > > > principle of equal representation.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
>> > >>> > > > or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
>> > >>> > > > voters or exclude legitimate ones.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
>> > >>> > > > violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
>> > >>> > > > candidate or party.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
>> > >>> > > > favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
>> > >>> > > > reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
>> > >>> > > > voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
>> > >>> > > > based on informed choice.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
>> > >>> > > > confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
>> > >>> > > > in voting.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
>> > >>> > > > systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
>> > >>> > > > online to influence public opinion.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
>> > >>> > > > funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
>> > >>> > > > party.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
>> > >>> > > > others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
>> > >>> > > > the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the
>> > >>> > > > electorate.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
>> > >>> > > > campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
>> > >>> > > > to gain an unfair advantage.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
>> > >>> > > > independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
>> > >>> > > > play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
>> > >>> > > > positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased
>> > >>> > > > decision-making and compromised election administration.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
>> > >>> > > > to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
>> > >>> > > > campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
>> > >>> > > > mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
>> > >>> > > > between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
>> > >>> > > > identity lines.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
>> > >>> > > > strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
>> > >>> > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
>> > >>> > > > that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
>> > >>> > > > engage in questionable practices.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
>> > >>> > > > through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
>> > >>> > > > public opinion and sway voters.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
>> > >>> > > > certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
>> > >>> > > > and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
>> > >>> > > > disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
>> > >>> > > > the legitimacy of the process.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
>> > >>> > > > including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
>> > >>> > > > fraudulent postal votes.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
>> > >>> > > > favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
>> > >>> > > > long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
>> > >>> > > > to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
>> > >>> > > > disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
>> > >>> > > > target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
>> > >>> > > > field.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or
>> > >>> > > > administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on
>> > >>> > > > questionable grounds.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
>> > >>> > > > parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
>> > >>> > > > a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
>> > >>> > > > election to undermine its legitimacy.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
>> > >>> > > > are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
>> > >>> > > > impartiality of the electoral process.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
>> > >>> > > > nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
>> > >>> > > > opponents.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
>> > >>> > > > information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
>> > >>> > > > issues, or the electoral process.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
>> > >>> > > > reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
>> > >>> > > > election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
>> > >>> > > > systems.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
>> > >>> > > > bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
>> > >>> > > > manipulate online discussions.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
>> > >>> > > > to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
>> > >>> > > > demographics.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
>> > >>> > > > voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
>> > >>> > > > in favor of a particular candidate or party.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
>> > >>> > > > debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
>> > >>> > > > candidate or party.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
>> > >>> > > > forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
>> > >>> > > > discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
>> > >>> > > > resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
>> > >>> > > > support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
>> > >>> > > > positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
>> > >>> > > > to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
>> > >>> > > > particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
>> > >>> > > > to the perceived majority opinion.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
>> > >>> > > > civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
>> > >>> > > > voter attitudes.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
>> > >>> > > > opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
>> > >>> > > > strategies.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
>> > >>> > > > presence of international election observers to create a false
>> > >>> > > > appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
>> > >>> > > > critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
>> > >>> > > > gain a tactical advantage.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
>> > >>> > > > uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
>> > >>> > > > using financial markets as a tool.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
>> > >>> > > > issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
>> > >>> > > > discourse, and influence voter priorities.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > i almost forgot...a USB stick.
>> > >>> > > >
>> > >>> > > > --
>> > >>> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> > >>> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>> > >>> > > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>> > >>> > >
>> > >>> > > --
>> > >>> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> > >>> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>> > >>> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > --
>> > >>> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> > >>> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>> > >>> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --
>> > >>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> > >>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>> > >>> and challenge the unchallengeable.
>>
>> --
>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>> and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.

The Starmaker wrote:
> The Question of course is...
> what NUMBER
> will the Democrats decide to
> rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
> Voting Machine????

1. bamboo ballots

2. magic thermostats

3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine

4. HUGO CHAVEZ

5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes

Gronk wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Question of course is...
> > what NUMBER
> > will the Democrats decide to
> > rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
> > Voting Machine????
>
> 1. bamboo ballots
>
> 2. magic thermostats
>
> 3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine
>
> 4. HUGO CHAVEZ
>
> 5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes

you forgot 6.

6. Ukrainian hit squad.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Gronk wrote:
>
> The Starmaker wrote:
> > The Question of course is...
> > what NUMBER
> > will the Democrats decide to
> > rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
> > Voting Machine????
>
> 1. bamboo ballots
>
> 2. magic thermostats
>
> 3. ballots from NoKo coming into a port in Maine
>
> 4. HUGO CHAVEZ
>
> 5. satellites controlled from Italy switch votes

Everybody knows Democrats can only count up to...5.

(whether you use your right hand or your left hand or both, it counts only up to 5.)

As you people probably already know...

someone told Biden and Kamala Harris that half of the USA population has 'below
average intelligence.' That's their audience they are trying to reach. That is why Kamal uses Baby Talk. BabyNonmics.

In today's Wall Street Jorunal the Headline reads:

"Harris needs to win over non-college-educated voters, ..."

https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/nevada-election-swing-state-trump-harris-1cea51ed?mod=hp_lista_pos1

a person who does not have a degree from a university or college, or, in
the U.S., a diploma from a high school :
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/non-graduate

(people like Gronk who can only count up to 5)

"Harris needs to win over non-college-educated voters, ..."
a person who does not have a degree from a university or college, or, in
the U.S., a diploma from a high school :

In other words, 3rd grade reading level adults.

Run Spot Run.

--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
and challenge the unchallengeable.

Believe it or not...
they are planning to Rig the voting machine
to read number...57.

On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 11:59:18 -0700, The Starmaker
<starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

>The Question of course is...
>what NUMBER
>will the Democrats decide to
>rig the Dominion and Smartmatic
>Voting Machine????
>
>by 51, or by 52 percent?
>
>
>No way 100%, or
>90's
>80's
>70's
>60's...
>
>(maybe some other country)
>
>it has to be in the low 50's.
>
>wadda you think?
>
>59 sounds too high and
>unrealistic.
>
>58 i don't think so
>
>
>I say, not over 52. and not under 51.
>
>
>
>"It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."
>
>The software does the counting.
>
>
>But it is very important that real people
>vote in order for the 'switch' to be made.
>
>
>
>Get out your hardhats!
>https://news.google.com/search?q=cart%20hardhat%20ballot&hl=en-US&gl=US&ceid=US%3Aen
>
>
>
>there is an election coming...
>
>
>
>Zelenskyy is screaming "WHERE ARE ALL MY HITMEN????"
>
>
>
>didn't you hear, there is an election coming!
>
>
>Put all the ballot boxes in Black neighborhoods only, and cart off
>all the ballot boxes in White neighborhoods.
>
>
>I'm telling you..Democrats know all the tricks for
>
>
>How To Rig an Election, Again in 2024
>
>
>
>Learn Grasshopper.
>
>
>
> 52 sounds kind of high...what do you think?
>
>51 sounds just right.
>
>
>Not too hot, not too cold..just right.
>
>
>Goldenlocks knows best.
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>The Starmaker wrote:
>>>
>>> Someone once said..."It's not who votes that count, it's who counts the votes."
>>>
>>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Donald Trump said, ' if Jesus Christ would have counted his votes, he
>>> > could have easily won '
>>> >
>>> > 'If Jesus Christ came down and was the vote counter, I would win'
>>> >
>>> > But it is the Democrats that do the counting and the Dominion Voting
>>> > Machines rigs the count.
>>> >
>>> > Democrat: "As long as I count the Votes, what are you going to do
>>> > about it?"
>>> > https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=5900&img_step=1&mode=large
>>> >
>>> > The more things change, the more they remain the same.
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 21:20:02 -0700, The Starmaker
>>> > <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >So, wats the status of the Democrats Plan? Are they going to
>>> > >assassinate Trump or simply Cancel the Election on November????
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >I don't see any other 'option' that they have.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >I don't see any at all.
>>> > >
>>> > >do you?
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:20:17 -0800, The Starmaker
>>> > ><starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >>By now you people should be able to SMELL
>>> > >>that the next plan from the democracts is to...
>>> > >>*cancel* the election"????
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>Donald Trump KNOWS the democracts
>>> > >>are now planning to cancel the upcoming
>>> > >>2024 election...
>>> > >>
>>> > >>i think he is having fun.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>What kind of Americans are you?
>>> > >>
>>> > >>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDyQxtg0V2w
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>Nancy Pelosi has her own plans...
>>> > >>she's on the sixth floor
>>> > >>Texas Library.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>and her daughter is on the phone...
>>> > >>"I'll tell you when to shoot, mom!"
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>Anybody wanna bet a million dollars the democracts will cancel the election?
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>I BET YOU A FUCKING MILLION DOLLARS THEY WILL CANCEL THE ELECTION!!!!
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>(i don't think nancy can shoot straight)
>>> > >>
>>> > >>HER FUCKIN RIFLE IS SHAKING UP AND DOWN!!!
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>election-rigging at it's best!
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>The Starmaker wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> I mean, don't you people think that if
>>> > >>> Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up
>>> > >>> that the next plan from the democracts is to...
>>> > >>> *cancel* the election"????
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Are you people not prepared for this??
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> That's the plan.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> The plan is to *cancel* the election.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> In other words, if Trump gets through all the brick walls, there won't be an election.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> for "technical reasons"...
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> one can come up with
>>> > >>> thousands of reasons..
>>> > >>> like fabricate that all the
>>> > >>> voting machines have been tampered with, etc.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> election delayed is election denied.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> BE PREPARED! If he gets thru, the election will be canceled!
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> It's called...'election manipulation'....
>>> > >>> interfering with the election process.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> or
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> "How To Rig an Election in 2024" author -The Starmaker
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> throwing your
>>> > >>> oppenents
>>> > >>> out the window is
>>> > >>> 'election manipulation'.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> It is a..coup d'etat.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> The Starmaker wrote:
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > Now, if Donald Trump 'manages' to get pass all the brick walls they put up, and
>>> > >>> > any other hurdles...'they' can always..
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > delay the election day for "technical reasons"..
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > election delayed is election denied.
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > Nancy Pelosi: "CALL OFF THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!"
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > Trump: "You cannot call off the election!"
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > Nancy Pelosi: "I'LL THROW YOU OUT THE FUCKIN WINDOW MOTHERFUCKER!!!!"
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > The Starmaker wrote:
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > How To Rig an Election, Again... in 2024
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > Paul Kagame, president of Rwanda, won 99% of the vote last time, so it
>>> > >>> > > is safe to say he will be re-elected in August.
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > https://archive.ph/vFYH0
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > Paul Kagame is the MAN!
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > (read about his opponents)
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > How To Get 99% Of The Vote!!!!
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/06/world/africa/rwanda-elections-paul-kagame.html
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > https://archive.ph/vFYH0
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > He's got a great way to rig an election! Instead of just getting rid of
>>> > >>> > > his opponents...he gets rid of the voters too!
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > one million of them in 90 days!
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > dats how you get 99% Of The Vote.
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > he no need no stinky usb stick.
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > The Starmaker wrote:
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Does the polls say who are the dead people voting for?
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > I mean, dead people do vote, right? Just...who are they voting for?
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > I haven't seen the polls mentioned them.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > I know the electoral roll hasn't been updated so that means
>>> > >>> > > > the same dead people who voted in the last election will
>>> > >>> > > > be voting again...just, i want to know who is their favorite candidate?
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Do dead people vote by mail or do they
>>> > >>> > > > stuffing ballot boxes at night?
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Just in case yous people don't know how many registered dead people
>>> > >>> > > > there are...
>>> > >>> > > > 1.8 million.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > How To Rig an Election, Again!
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Voter Suppression: This involves efforts to reduce the number of
>>> > >>> > > > eligible voters or make it difficult for certain groups to vote. Tactics
>>> > >>> > > > may include restrictive voter ID laws, purging voter rolls, and limiting
>>> > >>> > > > polling place accessibility.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Gerrymandering: Manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts
>>> > >>> > > > to favor one political party over another. This can lead to a
>>> > >>> > > > disproportionate representation of certain groups and undermine the
>>> > >>> > > > principle of equal representation.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Fraudulent Voter Registration: Illegitimate registration of voters
>>> > >>> > > > or manipulation of voter registration records to create fictitious
>>> > >>> > > > voters or exclude legitimate ones.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Intimidation and Violence: Coercive tactics, such as physical
>>> > >>> > > > violence or threats, to discourage voters from supporting a particular
>>> > >>> > > > candidate or party.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Media Manipulation: Controlling or influencing media coverage to
>>> > >>> > > > favor one candidate or party over others. This can include biased
>>> > >>> > > > reporting, censorship, or spreading misinformation.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Vote Buying: Offering material incentives or direct payments to
>>> > >>> > > > voters in exchange for their votes, undermining the principle of voting
>>> > >>> > > > based on informed choice.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Manipulation of Ballot Design: Designing ballots in a way that
>>> > >>> > > > confuses or misleads voters, potentially leading to unintentional errors
>>> > >>> > > > in voting.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Hacking and Cyber Interference: Tampering with electronic voting
>>> > >>> > > > systems, hacking political party databases, or spreading disinformation
>>> > >>> > > > online to influence public opinion.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Abuse of State Resources: Using government resources, such as public
>>> > >>> > > > funds or state-controlled media, to benefit a specific candidate or
>>> > >>> > > > party.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Misuse of Proxy Voting: Allowing voters to cast ballots on behalf of
>>> > >>> > > > others without proper authorization, leading to potential abuse.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Voter Roll Manipulation: Purposely adding or removing voters from
>>> > >>> > > > the electoral roll to influence the demographic composition of the
>>> > >>> > > > electorate.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Election Funding Irregularities: Improper use or manipulation of
>>> > >>> > > > campaign finances, including accepting illegal campaign contributions,
>>> > >>> > > > to gain an unfair advantage.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Suppression of Independent Monitoring: Restricting the activities of
>>> > >>> > > > independent election observers, both domestic and international, who
>>> > >>> > > > play a crucial role in ensuring transparency and fairness.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Biased Election Administration: Appointing partisan officials to key
>>> > >>> > > > positions in electoral commissions, potentially leading to biased
>>> > >>> > > > decision-making and compromised election administration.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Dual Voting: Exploiting weaknesses in voter identification systems
>>> > >>> > > > to allow individuals to vote multiple times using different identities.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Infiltration of Political Parties: Infiltrating political parties or
>>> > >>> > > > campaigns to gather information or disrupt operations from within.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Misuse of Absentee Voting: Manipulating the process of absentee or
>>> > >>> > > > mail-in voting, including coercion or interception of ballots.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Ethnic and Religious Polarization: Exploiting existing tensions
>>> > >>> > > > between different ethnic or religious groups to sway votes along
>>> > >>> > > > identity lines.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Election Timing Manipulation: Choosing specific election dates to
>>> > >>> > > > strategically benefit one party or disadvantage another, such as
>>> > >>> > > > scheduling elections during a time of crisis for political gain.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Inadequate Electoral Laws: Designing or maintaining electoral laws
>>> > >>> > > > that lack clarity, making it easier to exploit legal loopholes and
>>> > >>> > > > engage in questionable practices.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Fake News and Disinformation Campaigns: Spreading false information
>>> > >>> > > > through traditional media, social media, or other channels to influence
>>> > >>> > > > public opinion and sway voters.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Strategic Candidate Withdrawal: Coordinating the withdrawal of
>>> > >>> > > > certain candidates to consolidate support behind a preferred candidate
>>> > >>> > > > and strategically alter the electoral landscape.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Election Day Irregularities: Deliberately creating chaos or
>>> > >>> > > > disruptions on election day to discourage voter turnout or cast doubt on
>>> > >>> > > > the legitimacy of the process.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Misuse of Postal Votes: Manipulating the handling of postal votes,
>>> > >>> > > > including tampering with mail-in ballots or coercing voters to submit
>>> > >>> > > > fraudulent postal votes.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Partisan Polling Stations: Placing polling stations in locations
>>> > >>> > > > favorable to a specific candidate or party, or intentionally creating
>>> > >>> > > > long wait times in areas that are less supportive.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Foreign Interference: Involvement by foreign entities in an attempt
>>> > >>> > > > to influence or manipulate election outcomes, including cyberattacks,
>>> > >>> > > > disinformation campaigns, or financial support.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Selective Law Enforcement: Using law enforcement selectively to
>>> > >>> > > > target opposition candidates or parties, creating an uneven playing
>>> > >>> > > > field.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Disqualification of Opposition Candidates: Employing legal or
>>> > >>> > > > administrative mechanisms to disqualify opposition candidates on
>>> > >>> > > > questionable grounds.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Controlled Opposition: Supporting or creating pseudo-opposition
>>> > >>> > > > parties to divide the opposition vote and prevent a unified challenge.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Voter Apathy Promotion: Discrediting the electoral process to foster
>>> > >>> > > > a sense of disillusionment and apathy among potential voters.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Election Boycotts: Encouraging or orchestrating a boycott of the
>>> > >>> > > > election to undermine its legitimacy.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Co-option of Electoral Officials: Ensuring that election officials
>>> > >>> > > > are sympathetic to a particular candidate or party, compromising the
>>> > >>> > > > impartiality of the electoral process.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Influencing Candidate Nominations: Manipulating the candidate
>>> > >>> > > > nomination process to exclude strong competitors or ensure weaker
>>> > >>> > > > opponents.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Selective Voter Education: Providing biased or incomplete
>>> > >>> > > > information to voters to manipulate their understanding of candidates,
>>> > >>> > > > issues, or the electoral process.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Manipulation of Election Results: Tampering with the counting and
>>> > >>> > > > reporting of votes to produce inaccurate or fraudulent results.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Election Infrastructure Sabotage: Physically damaging or disrupting
>>> > >>> > > > election infrastructure, such as polling stations or electronic voting
>>> > >>> > > > systems.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Use of Political Bots: Employing automated social media accounts or
>>> > >>> > > > bots to amplify certain narratives, drown out opposition voices, or
>>> > >>> > > > manipulate online discussions.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Identity Politics Exploitation: Manipulating identity-based issues
>>> > >>> > > > to create divisions among voters and consolidate support within specific
>>> > >>> > > > demographics.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Selective Voter Mobilization: Targeting specific demographics for
>>> > >>> > > > voter mobilization efforts while neglecting others to manipulate turnout
>>> > >>> > > > in favor of a particular candidate or party.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Unfair Access to Media: Providing unequal access to media coverage,
>>> > >>> > > > debates, or advertising opportunities, giving an advantage to one
>>> > >>> > > > candidate or party.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Subtle Voter Intimidation: Rather than overt threats, using subtle
>>> > >>> > > > forms of intimidation, such as anonymous messages or veiled warnings, to
>>> > >>> > > > discourage voters from supporting a particular candidate.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Selective Provision of Public Goods: Leveraging control over public
>>> > >>> > > > resources to selectively provide benefits or services to areas that
>>> > >>> > > > support a specific candidate or party, influencing voter sentiment.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Strategic Timing of Government Announcements: Timing the release of
>>> > >>> > > > positive government news or policy announcements close to the election
>>> > >>> > > > to influence voter perceptions and sway opinions.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Social Pressure Tactics: Encouraging social norms that favor a
>>> > >>> > > > particular candidate or party, making voters feel pressured to conform
>>> > >>> > > > to the perceived majority opinion.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Cooptation of Civil Society: Infiltrating or co-opting independent
>>> > >>> > > > civil society organizations to manipulate public discourse and influence
>>> > >>> > > > voter attitudes.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Infiltration of Opposition Camps: Placing moles or agents within
>>> > >>> > > > opposition parties to gather information, sow discord, or disrupt their
>>> > >>> > > > strategies.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Election Observation Manipulation: Faking or manipulating the
>>> > >>> > > > presence of international election observers to create a false
>>> > >>> > > > appearance of a transparent and fair electoral process.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Strategic Candidate Replacement: Substituting a candidate at a
>>> > >>> > > > critical point in the election process to exploit legal loopholes or
>>> > >>> > > > gain a tactical advantage.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Financial Market Manipulation: Creating or exploiting economic
>>> > >>> > > > uncertainties to influence voter behavior and perceptions, potentially
>>> > >>> > > > using financial markets as a tool.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > Manufactured Issue Amplification: Creating or exaggerating specific
>>> > >>> > > > issues to divert attention from critical matters, manipulate public
>>> > >>> > > > discourse, and influence voter priorities.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > i almost forgot...a USB stick.
>>> > >>> > > >
>>> > >>> > > > --
>>> > >>> > > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>> > >>> > > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>>> > >>> > > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>>> > >>> > >
>>> > >>> > > --
>>> > >>> > > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>> > >>> > > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>>> > >>> > > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>>> > >>> >
>>> > >>> > --
>>> > >>> > The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>> > >>> > to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>>> > >>> > and challenge the unchallengeable.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> --
>>> > >>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>> > >>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>>> > >>> and challenge the unchallengeable.
>>>
>>> --
>>> The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
>>> to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, say the unsayable,
>>> and challenge the unchallengeable.
--
The Starmaker -- To question the unquestionable, ask the unaskable,
to think the unthinkable, mention the unmentionable, and challenge
the unchallengeable.