Rocksolid Light

News from da outaworlds

mail  files  register  groups  login

Message-ID:  

Q: Why did the WASP cross the road? A: To get to the middle.


sci / sci.physics.relativity / Re: Theoretical Force carrying bosons

SubjectAuthor
* Re: Theoretical Force carrying bosonsPรกsztor Borbรฉly Mรฉszรกros
`- Re: Theoretical Force carrying bosonsOmer Mahanov

1
Subject: Re: Theoretical Force carrying bosons
From: Omer Mahanov
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics, sci.math
Followup: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Organization: To protect and to server
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 10:26 UTC
References: 1 2 3
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
From: nrvo@mh.ru (Omer Mahanov)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: Theoretical Force carrying bosons
Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 10:26:27 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: To protect and to server
Message-ID: <v12e4j$2vakq$2@paganini.bofh.team>
References: <uuo0lt$16aoj$1@dont-email.me>
<v0qugu$259ok$1@paganini.bofh.team> <v10fqm$3v2ot$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 3 May 2024 10:26:27 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="3123866"; posting-host="2wbMSou2JF4mzf6UICN5zQ.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
User-Agent: slnr/1.0.4 (SunOS/5.10; x86_64)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAGFBMVEWii39NWj3k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X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
X-Face: /?Jwzj;[bpBW^cQ4w_'LwcWLKs\S'0y4:hJXgez&Ms;IAv;?y?[m6AQQ'm\*pH3p
1@N:Jd[v[dNS\ZA<e,(:2I.,m}J5/jBM),C@Z4N$#Z+|^nn{_js%0GD,=_>'z+K@wH.TN]P
jL$%p4Za4T2]WiNKB0%"Y975c,lz%amZ-(<;bONo|"a&?$\j9=.kXT"Jk[^SX`U|R%Mp'[N
HBgdPW]!Y8Ou3yNq/S7]Y\RO')%0bu+Rre|$tX-W]kuDrK9DKMzmvPAEL8.f'9%)O=k&l=g
64FJkz';8Z&jK5uI6k.A_^c}&^W(/+g
View all headers

Volney wrote:

> Not very useful, nymshifter, please explain more about tensors if you
> can.
>
> Regarding tensors, since the spin of the boson corresponds to the
> dimensions of the associated field tensor (does anyone know why/how?),
> a spin 0 boson would have a zero dimensional scalar field (like
> temperature of points within a volume), spin 1 a vector with a
> direction, spin 3 and beyond would be quite interesting with 3+
> dimensional tensors. What would this look like in real life?

entirely nonsense, as quantum particles, talking about spatial dimensions
is 100% nonsense. It's an another domain, my friend. You guys of physics
are not familiar with domains. You think macro scale logic and interactions
applies to quantum scale. This is gay.

๐—๐—ฒ๐˜„๐˜€_๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ปโ€™๐˜_๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น_๐—๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜‚๐˜€_โ€“_๐—จ๐—ฆ_๐—›๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ_๐—ผ๐—ณ_๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€
Lawmakers have broadened the definition of anti-Semitism in the latest
legislation
https://www.r%74.com/news/596891-jews-jesus-us-israel/

Looks like the people are waking up and The Chosen Ones are getting
nervous.

He never laughed at them but said, "๐™„๐™› ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช ๐™ฌ๐™š๐™ง๐™š ๐™ฌ๐™๐™ค ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช ๐™จ๐™–๐™ฎ ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช ๐™–๐™ง๐™š, ๐™ฎ๐™ค๐™ช'๐™™ ๐™ ๐™ฃ๐™ค๐™ฌ
๐™ฌ๐™๐™ค ๐™„ ๐˜ผ๐™ˆ."

Sleeping Nations either die or wake up as slaves.

Subject: Re: Theoretical Force carrying bosons
From: Pรกsztor Borbรฉly Mร
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics.research, sci.physics
Followup: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics.research,sci.physics
Organization: To protect and to server
Date: Thu, 2 May 2024 14:27 UTC
References: 1
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: ojt@rtr.hu (Pรกsztor Borbรฉly Mรฉszรกros)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics.research,sci.physics
Subject: Re: Theoretical Force carrying bosons
Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics.research,sci.physics
Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 07:27:39 PDT
Organization: To protect and to server
Lines: 20
Approved: Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]" <dr.j.thornburg@gmail-pink.com (sci.physics.research)
Message-ID: <v0qugu$259ok$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References: <uuo0lt$16aoj$1@dont-email.me>
X-Trace: individual.net vBrhimgh9+ZNzf3g/Ed2/QGtNFKKrhIpPrx/38G2BGs3AuHAgPL7h9ml/e
Cancel-Lock: sha1:a/9OVIC8S7bd6t3BnfQHQIMbGyQ= sha256:9AUc8BiLC2sw7koLksitEE9OSFj9Cci1zKTSxNISw0M=
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=2; AJvYcCUIN2iv6RvZDpB1Ru3I7rDwBB8PjLPg8RRki3vdq1QjMNuOqOQCkrvx8hcUKlym68l5kWu8Re094N7/CVrLfNwjsX8WDu+XIs4X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEGQsYuwXgpBWdySayZZ4v+ZfV6WcosAM+ooBHuARdW+3D6AlFF7AoU6HKz62Sj5Wm0FCjz
X-Face: $"eO7q^g,@mN0klG2J]sV"NMbeVMf2'-;P*@(~`UkK_cA{lP/ixtb>t!n{xTQK<7
View all headers

Volney wrote:

> My question is, assume there is a massless (or very tiny mass, not
> massive like W/Z) boson with spin-0 which mediates a new force. Its
> field 'tensor'
> would be zero-dimensional or just a scalar. What would this mean on a
> macroscopic scale? I guess each point in space would have a simple value
> in response to a nearby charge, not a vector like EM.
>
> How about a spin-3 (or more!) boson? Spin-3 would imply a 3D tensor
> defining its field's properties. Again what macroscopic properties would
> a field mediated by a spin-3 boson have? I know this is vague since the
> only property is the spin of the mediating boson but this must imply
> certain properties come from this, but what?

this is incorrect. To undrestand that you have to undrestand tensors big
time. Not just overbebly.

[[Mod. note -- Marketing spam snipped.
DON'T INCLUDE SPAM IN YOUR POSTS! -- jt]]

1

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor