Message-ID:

If you think last Tuesday was a drag, wait till you see what happens tomorrow!

sci / sci.physics.particle / Physics Needs Philosophy / Philosophy Needs Physics

Subject: Physics Needs Philosophy / Philosophy Needs Physics
From: 44socrat@gmail.com
Newsgroups: sci.physics.particle
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 10:28 UTC

X-Received: by 2002:ac8:674e:: with SMTP id n14mr18933974qtp.302.1580639321805; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 02:28:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:4f97:: with SMTP id d145mr14939538ywb.60.1580639321560; Sun, 02 Feb 2020 02:28:41 -0800 (PST)
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder5.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.physics.particle
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 02:28:41 -0800 (PST)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2409:4073:49c:cf03:4508:545b:3775:c7f1; posting-account=mCLpngoAAAAepEiGXiFE_gvwI2sitJzc
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2409:4073:49c:cf03:4508:545b:3775:c7f1
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <6962dda4-80d6-4661-bd0c-593a366c87ca@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Physics Needs Philosophy / Philosophy Needs Physics
From: 44socrat@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2020 10:28:41 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lines: 33

View all headers

Physics Needs Philosophy / Philosophy Needs Physics
---
Philosophy has always played an essential role in the
development of science, physics in particular,
and is likely to continue to do so
By Carlo Rovelli on July 18, 2018
---
Contrary to claims about the irrelevance of philosophy for science,
philosophy has always had, and still has, far more influence on physics
than commonly assumed. A certain current anti-philosophical ideology
has had damaging effects on the fertility of science.
----
After Ptolemy, Copernicus, Galileo . . .
After Newton, Leibniz, . . .
After Faraday, Maxwell, Boltzmann, . . .
After Einstein, . . . Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, . . .
1 - What is space?
2 - What is time?
3 - What is matter ?
4 - What is the “present”?
5 - Is the world deterministic?
6 - Do we need to take the observer into account to describe nature?
7 - What is the quantum wave function?
8 - What exactly does “emergence” mean?
9 - Does a theory of the totality of the universe make sense?
10 - Does it make sense to think that physical laws
themselves might evolve?
11 - The bing-bang , the expanding universe . . . ?
12 - Dark matter, dark energy, black holes, . . . ?
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/physics-needs-philosophy-philosophy-needs-physics/

It is clear, nowadays we don't have philosophy of science
=================

Subject	Author
Physics Needs Philosophy / Philosophy Needs Physics	44socrat