https://archive.md/P1pQ3

Assisted-Suicide Activists Sue Catholic Hospital in Canada

(Darwin Brandis/Getty Images)
Share
6 Comments
Listen
By THOMAS MCKENNA
June 20, 2024 2:12 PM
All Our Opinion in Your Inbox
NR Daily is delivered right to you every afternoon. No charge.
Enter your email

SUBSCRIBE
Pro-euthanasia activists and the family of a patient killed by assisted
suicide sued a Catholic health organization on Monday for refusing to
provide the lethal procedure.
When a 34-year-old cancer patient at St. Paul’s Hospital requested
assisted suicide last year, the Catholic hospital in Vancouver
transferred her to another health facility that provided it. But her
parents say the transfer violated their daughter’s rights under the
Canadian constitution, and are suing Providence Health Care — the
Catholic health organization that runs St. Paul’s — and the British
Columbia Health Minister.
TOP STORIES
1.
Biden’s Lawless Mass Amnesty
2.
The Resistance Sequel Will Be Even Worse
3.
Climate Activists Vandalize Stonehenge with Spray Paint
The plaintiffs argue that all palliative care centers must provide
in-house access to assisted suicide, regardless of religious beliefs.
National Review first reported the details of the suit in February.
Activist group Dying with Dignity Canada is also a plaintiff in the suit
and helped assemble a legal team. Daphne Gilbert, vice chairwoman of
Dying with Dignity Canada, told NR in February she hopes the case will
“pave the way for ending the ability of religion to dictate health care.”
The challenge is a “test case,” Gilbert told NR, for compelling
religious medical institutions to provide abortions and
“gender-affirming care,” in addition to assisted suicide.
“Religious institutions would either have to decide to get out of the
business of offering medical care, and it could be taken over by the
province,” Gilbert said, “or these institutions would have to align
their care with the Constitution, even if it opposes their values.”
The suit argues religious health centers that do not provide MAID
violate a patient’s “freedom of conscience and religion” and “right to
life, liberty, and security” guaranteed in the Canadian Charter of
Rights and Freedoms.
Since patients under the Catholic hospital’s care are entitled to
“freedom from religion,” the suit claims, Providence’s religious beliefs
cannot dictate its health-care practices.
Jyothi Jayaraman, a palliative care doctor who left Providence, is also
suing the health organization for preventing her from performing
euthanasia. The lawsuit argues the policies of Providence and the B.C.
government infringe on a clinician’s ability to “discharge their
professional obligations and to practice medicine free from religious
coercion and in a manner consistent with their own conscience.”
Canada is “five to seven years ahead” of the United States on these
issues, said ​​Andrew Bennett, program director for faith communities at
Cardus, a Canadian think tank.
“And I don’t mean in a positive direction — a very negative direction,”
Bennett told NR in February.
The St. Paul’s patient denied access to assisted suicide, 34-year-old
Samantha O’Neill, gained public attention last June. When O’Neill, who
had been diagnosed with stage-four cancer, opted for a medically
assisted death, St. Paul’s hospital could prepare her for the procedure
but could not administer the drugs that would ultimately kill her.
O’Neill’s parents said the transfer, which took a couple of hours,
caused their daughter unnecessary pain and robbed them of their final
moments with her.
In response to public pressure fueled by O’Neill’s transfer, the B.C.
government in November appropriated land from the hospital, according to
an Archdiocese of Vancouver publication, and announced it would build an
assisted-suicide center adjacent to St. Paul’s Hospital. The new
building will allow patients to more easily be transferred out of
Providence’s care to receive MAID.
But Gilbert told NR in February the deal does not go far enough, since
the transfer of the patient could still be painful and separate them
from their families, and since other facilities under Providence’s
management would still not be required to provide MAID.
The constitutional challenge cites the Canadian Charter’s fundamental
freedom of conscience and religion and argues that patients have a
“conscience right” to choose euthanasia. St. Paul’s, she said, must
provide MAID on-site.
“My argument would be that there is no freedom of religion for an
institution,” Gilbert said. “Bricks and mortar don’t have conscience and
religious beliefs. People within them might — and those people need to
be respected and accommodated — but the four walls of the building are
publicly funded health-care institutions.”
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association takes a similar view. Harini
Sivalingam, director of equality programs, said she would not comment on
the developing lawsuit against St. Paul’s but said the CCLA believes
religious hospitals “shouldn’t be granted an exemption from providing MAID.”
“All publicly funded hospitals, which includes anything religious,
should not be able to deny equitable health services,” Sivalingam told
NR in February, “whether that’s access to abortion, gender-affirming
care, or providing end-of-life services such as MAID.”
The day after Providence and the British Columbia government struck the
deal, on November 29, the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops
released a statement saying they “unanimously and unequivocally oppose
the performance of either euthanasia or assisted suicide within health
organizations with a Catholic identity.”
Assisted suicide was illegal in Canada until 2015, when the Supreme
Court found the nationwide prohibition unconstitutional. In response,
the Parliament passed the Medical Assistance in Dying Act, which
legalized assisted suicide in certain circumstances.
Patients could receive MAID if their death was “reasonably foreseeable”
and their illness “grievous and irremediable.” A 2021 amendment removed
the “reasonably foreseeable” requirement.
Brian Bird, a lecturer at the University of British Columbia’s Peter A.
Allard School of Law, told NR in February the high court’s treatment of
religious liberty has been on the wrong track. The St. Paul’s case, he
said, could be “an opportunity to correct course.”
“It seems to me that what reconciliation could look like is allowing a
health-care institution like St. Paul’s or other healthcare institutions
to provide 99.5 percent of legal health-care services, but for
conscientious or ethical or religious reasons, not provide certain
procedures,” Bird said. “It’s quite a heavy-handed argument to say they
must provide everything.”
Canada’s supreme court has been unfriendly to religious-liberty claims
in recent years. A 2018 ruling by the supreme court denied accreditation
to a law school proposed by Trinity Western University, a private
university that adheres to Christian teachings on traditional marriage.
Despite the university’s academic achievements and contributions, the
court ruled that the school’s faith-based community standards could
potentially harm the dignity of LGBT students.
Providence is “reviewing the court filing in order to determine next
steps,” a spokesperson told NR in a Tuesday email statement.
“As Providence is a Catholic Health Care provider, MAiD is not available
at our facilities,” the statement read. “Consistent with British
Columbia’s regulations, Providence works to ensure patient requests for
MAiD are addressed in a timely and safe manner and that patients
requesting the service are brought to a health-care organization that
provides it.”
Since its legalization, deaths from MAID have risen from 1,018 in 2016
to 13,241 in 2022, accounting for 4 percent of all deaths in Canada.
Send a tip to the news team at NR.

> HeartDoc Andrewabout 10 hours ago
> In the interim, the only godly way to prevent MAID deaths is by
> lifting up our LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth as our #1 Example of
> living http://WonderfullyHungry.org ( https://bit.ly/LK2442 ) so that
> in the Holy Spirit, we have "love, joy, peace, patience, kindness,
> goodness, faithfulness, humility, and self-control" (Galatians
> 5:22-23) to counter the chaos of https://AntiChrist45.com (aka "the
> lawless one" of 2 Thessalonians 2:7-8 as proven by GOD making
> hangryDJT a 34-count convicted felon as a consequence of TFG being
> afflicted with the "hunger is starvation delusion" of 2 Thessalonians
> 2:11).
>
> Indeed, I am http://WonderfullyHungry.org for food right now (Luke
> 6:21a) and hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a
> healthy appetite for food right now too.
>
> So how are you ?
I am wonderfully hungry!

Michael

On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 07:59:28 -0700, Michael Ejercito
<MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:

>https://archive.md/P1pQ3
>
>
>Assisted-Suicide Activists Sue Catholic Hospital in Canada
>
>(Darwin Brandis/Getty Images)
>Share
>6 Comments
>Listen
>By THOMAS MCKENNA
>June 20, 2024 2:12 PM
>All Our Opinion in Your Inbox
>NR Daily is delivered right to you every afternoon. No charge.
>Enter your email
>
>SUBSCRIBE
>Pro-euthanasia activists and the family of a patient killed by assisted
>suicide sued a Catholic health organization on Monday for refusing to
>provide the lethal procedure.
>When a 34-year-old cancer patient at St. Paul’s Hospital requested
>assisted suicide last year, the Catholic hospital in Vancouver
>transferred her to another health facility that provided it. But her
>parents say the transfer violated their daughter’s rights under the
>Canadian constitution, and are suing Providence Health Care — the
>Catholic health organization that runs St. Paul’s — and the British
>Columbia Health Minister.
>TOP STORIES
>1.
>Biden’s Lawless Mass Amnesty
>2.
>The Resistance Sequel Will Be Even Worse
>3.
>Climate Activists Vandalize Stonehenge with Spray Paint
>The plaintiffs argue that all palliative care centers must provide
>in-house access to assisted suicide, regardless of religious beliefs.
>National Review first reported the details of the suit in February.
>Activist group Dying with Dignity Canada is also a plaintiff in the suit
>and helped assemble a legal team. Daphne Gilbert, vice chairwoman of
>Dying with Dignity Canada, told NR in February she hopes the case will
>“pave the way for ending the ability of religion to dictate health care.”
>The challenge is a “test case,” Gilbert told NR, for compelling
>religious medical institutions to provide abortions and
>“gender-affirming care,” in addition to assisted suicide.
>“Religious institutions would either have to decide to get out of the
>business of offering medical care, and it could be taken over by the
>province,” Gilbert said, “or these institutions would have to align
>their care with the Constitution, even if it opposes their values.”
>The suit argues religious health centers that do not provide MAID
>violate a patient’s “freedom of conscience and religion” and “right to
>life, liberty, and security” guaranteed in the Canadian Charter of
>Rights and Freedoms.
>Since patients under the Catholic hospital’s care are entitled to
>“freedom from religion,” the suit claims, Providence’s religious beliefs
>cannot dictate its health-care practices.
>Jyothi Jayaraman, a palliative care doctor who left Providence, is also
>suing the health organization for preventing her from performing
>euthanasia. The lawsuit argues the policies of Providence and the B.C.
>government infringe on a clinician’s ability to “discharge their
>professional obligations and to practice medicine free from religious
>coercion and in a manner consistent with their own conscience.”
>Canada is “five to seven years ahead” of the United States on these
>issues, said ??Andrew Bennett, program director for faith communities at
>Cardus, a Canadian think tank.
>“And I don’t mean in a positive direction — a very negative direction,”
>Bennett told NR in February.
>The St. Paul’s patient denied access to assisted suicide, 34-year-old
>Samantha O’Neill, gained public attention last June. When O’Neill, who
>had been diagnosed with stage-four cancer, opted for a medically
>assisted death, St. Paul’s hospital could prepare her for the procedure
>but could not administer the drugs that would ultimately kill her.
>O’Neill’s parents said the transfer, which took a couple of hours,
>caused their daughter unnecessary pain and robbed them of their final
>moments with her.
>In response to public pressure fueled by O’Neill’s transfer, the B.C.
>government in November appropriated land from the hospital, according to
>an Archdiocese of Vancouver publication, and announced it would build an
>assisted-suicide center adjacent to St. Paul’s Hospital. The new
>building will allow patients to more easily be transferred out of
>Providence’s care to receive MAID.
>But Gilbert told NR in February the deal does not go far enough, since
>the transfer of the patient could still be painful and separate them
>from their families, and since other facilities under Providence’s
>management would still not be required to provide MAID.
>The constitutional challenge cites the Canadian Charter’s fundamental
>freedom of conscience and religion and argues that patients have a
>“conscience right” to choose euthanasia. St. Paul’s, she said, must
>provide MAID on-site.
>“My argument would be that there is no freedom of religion for an
>institution,” Gilbert said. “Bricks and mortar don’t have conscience and
>religious beliefs. People within them might — and those people need to
>be respected and accommodated — but the four walls of the building are
>publicly funded health-care institutions.”
>The Canadian Civil Liberties Association takes a similar view. Harini
>Sivalingam, director of equality programs, said she would not comment on
>the developing lawsuit against St. Paul’s but said the CCLA believes
>religious hospitals “shouldn’t be granted an exemption from providing MAID.”
>“All publicly funded hospitals, which includes anything religious,
>should not be able to deny equitable health services,” Sivalingam told
>NR in February, “whether that’s access to abortion, gender-affirming
>care, or providing end-of-life services such as MAID.”
>The day after Providence and the British Columbia government struck the
>deal, on November 29, the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops
>released a statement saying they “unanimously and unequivocally oppose
>the performance of either euthanasia or assisted suicide within health
>organizations with a Catholic identity.”
>Assisted suicide was illegal in Canada until 2015, when the Supreme
>Court found the nationwide prohibition unconstitutional. In response,
>the Parliament passed the Medical Assistance in Dying Act, which
>legalized assisted suicide in certain circumstances.
>Patients could receive MAID if their death was “reasonably foreseeable”
>and their illness “grievous and irremediable.” A 2021 amendment removed
>the “reasonably foreseeable” requirement.
>Brian Bird, a lecturer at the University of British Columbia’s Peter A.
>Allard School of Law, told NR in February the high court’s treatment of
>religious liberty has been on the wrong track. The St. Paul’s case, he
>said, could be “an opportunity to correct course.”
>“It seems to me that what reconciliation could look like is allowing a
>health-care institution like St. Paul’s or other healthcare institutions
>to provide 99.5 percent of legal health-care services, but for
>conscientious or ethical or religious reasons, not provide certain
>procedures,” Bird said. “It’s quite a heavy-handed argument to say they
>must provide everything.”
>Canada’s supreme court has been unfriendly to religious-liberty claims
>in recent years. A 2018 ruling by the supreme court denied accreditation
>to a law school proposed by Trinity Western University, a private
>university that adheres to Christian teachings on traditional marriage.
>Despite the university’s academic achievements and contributions, the
>court ruled that the school’s faith-based community standards could
>potentially harm the dignity of LGBT students.
>Providence is “reviewing the court filing in order to determine next
>steps,” a spokesperson told NR in a Tuesday email statement.
>“As Providence is a Catholic Health Care provider, MAiD is not available
>at our facilities,” the statement read. “Consistent with British
>Columbia’s regulations, Providence works to ensure patient requests for
>MAiD are addressed in a timely and safe manner and that patients
>requesting the service are brought to a health-care organization that
>provides it.”
>Since its legalization, deaths from MAID have risen from 1,018 in 2016
>to 13,241 in 2022, accounting for 4 percent of all deaths in Canada.
>Send a tip to the news team at NR.

Are you looking to kill yourself? Don't let any laws stand in your
way. Do it!

Loose Cannon wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 07:59:28 -0700, Michael Ejercito
> <MEjercit@HotMail.com> wrote:
>
>> https://archive.md/P1pQ3
>>
>>
>> Assisted-Suicide Activists Sue Catholic Hospital in Canada
>>
>> (Darwin Brandis/Getty Images)
>> Share
>> 6 Comments
>> Listen
>> By THOMAS MCKENNA
>> June 20, 2024 2:12 PM
>> All Our Opinion in Your Inbox
>> NR Daily is delivered right to you every afternoon. No charge.
>> Enter your email
>>
>> SUBSCRIBE
>> Pro-euthanasia activists and the family of a patient killed by assisted
>> suicide sued a Catholic health organization on Monday for refusing to
>> provide the lethal procedure.
>> When a 34-year-old cancer patient at St. Paul’s Hospital requested
>> assisted suicide last year, the Catholic hospital in Vancouver
>> transferred her to another health facility that provided it. But her
>> parents say the transfer violated their daughter’s rights under the
>> Canadian constitution, and are suing Providence Health Care — the
>> Catholic health organization that runs St. Paul’s — and the British
>> Columbia Health Minister.
>> TOP STORIES
>> 1.
>> Biden’s Lawless Mass Amnesty
>> 2.
>> The Resistance Sequel Will Be Even Worse
>> 3.
>> Climate Activists Vandalize Stonehenge with Spray Paint
>> The plaintiffs argue that all palliative care centers must provide
>> in-house access to assisted suicide, regardless of religious beliefs.
>> National Review first reported the details of the suit in February.
>> Activist group Dying with Dignity Canada is also a plaintiff in the suit
>> and helped assemble a legal team. Daphne Gilbert, vice chairwoman of
>> Dying with Dignity Canada, told NR in February she hopes the case will
>> “pave the way for ending the ability of religion to dictate health care.”
>> The challenge is a “test case,” Gilbert told NR, for compelling
>> religious medical institutions to provide abortions and
>> “gender-affirming care,” in addition to assisted suicide.
>> “Religious institutions would either have to decide to get out of the
>> business of offering medical care, and it could be taken over by the
>> province,” Gilbert said, “or these institutions would have to align
>> their care with the Constitution, even if it opposes their values.”
>> The suit argues religious health centers that do not provide MAID
>> violate a patient’s “freedom of conscience and religion” and “right to
>> life, liberty, and security” guaranteed in the Canadian Charter of
>> Rights and Freedoms.
>> Since patients under the Catholic hospital’s care are entitled to
>> “freedom from religion,” the suit claims, Providence’s religious beliefs
>> cannot dictate its health-care practices.
>> Jyothi Jayaraman, a palliative care doctor who left Providence, is also
>> suing the health organization for preventing her from performing
>> euthanasia. The lawsuit argues the policies of Providence and the B.C.
>> government infringe on a clinician’s ability to “discharge their
>> professional obligations and to practice medicine free from religious
>> coercion and in a manner consistent with their own conscience.”
>> Canada is “five to seven years ahead” of the United States on these
>> issues, said ??Andrew Bennett, program director for faith communities at
>> Cardus, a Canadian think tank.
>> “And I don’t mean in a positive direction — a very negative direction,”
>> Bennett told NR in February.
>> The St. Paul’s patient denied access to assisted suicide, 34-year-old
>> Samantha O’Neill, gained public attention last June. When O’Neill, who
>> had been diagnosed with stage-four cancer, opted for a medically
>> assisted death, St. Paul’s hospital could prepare her for the procedure
>> but could not administer the drugs that would ultimately kill her.
>> O’Neill’s parents said the transfer, which took a couple of hours,
>> caused their daughter unnecessary pain and robbed them of their final
>> moments with her.
>> In response to public pressure fueled by O’Neill’s transfer, the B.C.
>> government in November appropriated land from the hospital, according to
>> an Archdiocese of Vancouver publication, and announced it would build an
>> assisted-suicide center adjacent to St. Paul’s Hospital. The new
>> building will allow patients to more easily be transferred out of
>> Providence’s care to receive MAID.
>> But Gilbert told NR in February the deal does not go far enough, since
>> the transfer of the patient could still be painful and separate them
>>from their families, and since other facilities under Providence’s
>> management would still not be required to provide MAID.
>> The constitutional challenge cites the Canadian Charter’s fundamental
>> freedom of conscience and religion and argues that patients have a
>> “conscience right” to choose euthanasia. St. Paul’s, she said, must
>> provide MAID on-site.
>> “My argument would be that there is no freedom of religion for an
>> institution,” Gilbert said. “Bricks and mortar don’t have conscience and
>> religious beliefs. People within them might — and those people need to
>> be respected and accommodated — but the four walls of the building are
>> publicly funded health-care institutions.”
>> The Canadian Civil Liberties Association takes a similar view. Harini
>> Sivalingam, director of equality programs, said she would not comment on
>> the developing lawsuit against St. Paul’s but said the CCLA believes
>> religious hospitals “shouldn’t be granted an exemption from providing MAID.”
>> “All publicly funded hospitals, which includes anything religious,
>> should not be able to deny equitable health services,” Sivalingam told
>> NR in February, “whether that’s access to abortion, gender-affirming
>> care, or providing end-of-life services such as MAID.”
>> The day after Providence and the British Columbia government struck the
>> deal, on November 29, the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops
>> released a statement saying they “unanimously and unequivocally oppose
>> the performance of either euthanasia or assisted suicide within health
>> organizations with a Catholic identity.”
>> Assisted suicide was illegal in Canada until 2015, when the Supreme
>> Court found the nationwide prohibition unconstitutional. In response,
>> the Parliament passed the Medical Assistance in Dying Act, which
>> legalized assisted suicide in certain circumstances.
>> Patients could receive MAID if their death was “reasonably foreseeable”
>> and their illness “grievous and irremediable.” A 2021 amendment removed
>> the “reasonably foreseeable” requirement.
>> Brian Bird, a lecturer at the University of British Columbia’s Peter A.
>> Allard School of Law, told NR in February the high court’s treatment of
>> religious liberty has been on the wrong track. The St. Paul’s case, he
>> said, could be “an opportunity to correct course.”
>> “It seems to me that what reconciliation could look like is allowing a
>> health-care institution like St. Paul’s or other healthcare institutions
>> to provide 99.5 percent of legal health-care services, but for
>> conscientious or ethical or religious reasons, not provide certain
>> procedures,” Bird said. “It’s quite a heavy-handed argument to say they
>> must provide everything.”
>> Canada’s supreme court has been unfriendly to religious-liberty claims
>> in recent years. A 2018 ruling by the supreme court denied accreditation
>> to a law school proposed by Trinity Western University, a private
>> university that adheres to Christian teachings on traditional marriage.
>> Despite the university’s academic achievements and contributions, the
>> court ruled that the school’s faith-based community standards could
>> potentially harm the dignity of LGBT students.
>> Providence is “reviewing the court filing in order to determine next
>> steps,” a spokesperson told NR in a Tuesday email statement.
>> “As Providence is a Catholic Health Care provider, MAiD is not available
>> at our facilities,” the statement read. “Consistent with British
>> Columbia’s regulations, Providence works to ensure patient requests for
>> MAiD are addressed in a timely and safe manner and that patients
>> requesting the service are brought to a health-care organization that
>> provides it.”
>> Since its legalization, deaths from MAID have risen from 1,018 in 2016
>> to 13,241 in 2022, accounting for 4 percent of all deaths in Canada.
>> Send a tip to the news team at NR.
>
> Are you looking to kill yourself?
No.