https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-law-review/

Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL

I gave a legal ethics seminar 90 minutes after finding my wife dead, and
these infants are too traumatized to take their exams because of a
“horrific time on campus” and their “level of distress”:

They don’t know the meaning of the word “professionalism” (my seminar
topic), and until they learn it and understand their duty to practice it
as lawyers, these students, supposedly the best of Columbia’s best, are
not fit to practice law.

Jonathan Turley didn’t mince words, and he has be a master word-mincer,
regarding this weenie-ism, writing, “Outside of the Columbia Law Review
offices is a thing called life. It is neither predictable nor
comfortable. We enter the lives of our clients when they are often
failing apart. We have to bring our skills and support at those moments
without the assistance of a trauma tent or emotional coach. We also
cannot ask judges for postponements to allow us to process the stress of
the moment.” He continued, “[O]ur clients look to us for strength not
fragility in such moments. The response from Columbia Law School should
be simple: see you at the exams.”

Bingo. Meanwhile, the ethics dunces at the Ethics Alarms Unethical
Website of the Century, Above the Law, reacted with its usual almost
infallible ability to get every issue wrong while deriding the more
competent analysts who got it right, writing, “As predictable as night
follows day, right-wing troll outlets are already mocking Columbia law
students for talking about “violence” and being “irrevocably shaken.”
But beyond the smug posturing, there’s not so much a substantive counter
to the arguments laid out in the letter.”

Whatever language that last sentence is supposed to be in…

Sure there’s a substantive counter; Turley made it. “Outside of the
Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life.”

Michael Ejercito wrote:

>https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-law-review/
>
>
>Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
>MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>
>
>I gave a legal ethics seminar 90 minutes after finding my wife dead, and
>these infants are too traumatized to take their exams because of a
>“horrific time on campus” and their “level of distress”:
>
>
>They don’t know the meaning of the word “professionalism” (my seminar
>topic), and until they learn it and understand their duty to practice it
>as lawyers, these students, supposedly the best of Columbia’s best, are
>not fit to practice law.
>
>Jonathan Turley didn’t mince words, and he has be a master word-mincer,
>regarding this weenie-ism, writing, “Outside of the Columbia Law Review
>offices is a thing called life. It is neither predictable nor
>comfortable. We enter the lives of our clients when they are often
>failing apart. We have to bring our skills and support at those moments
>without the assistance of a trauma tent or emotional coach. We also
>cannot ask judges for postponements to allow us to process the stress of
>the moment.” He continued, “[O]ur clients look to us for strength not
>fragility in such moments. The response from Columbia Law School should
>be simple: see you at the exams.”
>
>Bingo. Meanwhile, the ethics dunces at the Ethics Alarms Unethical
>Website of the Century, Above the Law, reacted with its usual almost
>infallible ability to get every issue wrong while deriding the more
>competent analysts who got it right, writing, “As predictable as night
>follows day, right-wing troll outlets are already mocking Columbia law
>students for talking about “violence” and being “irrevocably shaken.”
>But beyond the smug posturing, there’s not so much a substantive counter
>to the arguments laid out in the letter.”
>
>Whatever language that last sentence is supposed to be in…
>
>Sure there’s a substantive counter; Turley made it. “Outside of the
>Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life.”

And He Who is the life (John 14:6) is also the Prince of Peace (Isaiah
9:6) so that in Him, we have perfect (Matt 5:48) peace (Galatians
5:22-23).

Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
appetite for food right now too.

So how are you ?

(Peace) 05/06/24 Again not a LoosePeeledQuackIdiot bigot ...

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.med.cardiology/c/Ai33hw5PINI/m/wytVpY68MwAJ

Instead be "woke" to the sin of racial prejudice:

https://tinyurl.com/JesusIsWoke (i.e. not a Nazi bigot) *and* risen!!!

HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>
>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-law-review/
>>
>>
>> Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
>> MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>
>>
>> I gave a legal ethics seminar 90 minutes after finding my wife dead, and
>> these infants are too traumatized to take their exams because of a
>> “horrific time on campus” and their “level of distress”:
>>
>>
>> They don’t know the meaning of the word “professionalism” (my seminar
>> topic), and until they learn it and understand their duty to practice it
>> as lawyers, these students, supposedly the best of Columbia’s best, are
>> not fit to practice law.
>>
>> Jonathan Turley didn’t mince words, and he has be a master word-mincer,
>> regarding this weenie-ism, writing, “Outside of the Columbia Law Review
>> offices is a thing called life. It is neither predictable nor
>> comfortable. We enter the lives of our clients when they are often
>> failing apart. We have to bring our skills and support at those moments
>> without the assistance of a trauma tent or emotional coach. We also
>> cannot ask judges for postponements to allow us to process the stress of
>> the moment.” He continued, “[O]ur clients look to us for strength not
>> fragility in such moments. The response from Columbia Law School should
>> be simple: see you at the exams.”
>>
>> Bingo. Meanwhile, the ethics dunces at the Ethics Alarms Unethical
>> Website of the Century, Above the Law, reacted with its usual almost
>> infallible ability to get every issue wrong while deriding the more
>> competent analysts who got it right, writing, “As predictable as night
>> follows day, right-wing troll outlets are already mocking Columbia law
>> students for talking about “violence” and being “irrevocably shaken.”
>> But beyond the smug posturing, there’s not so much a substantive counter
>> to the arguments laid out in the letter.”
>>
>> Whatever language that last sentence is supposed to be in…
>>
>> Sure there’s a substantive counter; Turley made it. “Outside of the
>> Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life.”
>
> And He Who is the life (John 14:6) is also the Prince of Peace (Isaiah
> 9:6) so that in Him, we have perfect (Matt 5:48) peace (Galatians
> 5:22-23).
You got that right!

>
> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
> hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
> appetite for food right now too.
>
> So how are you ?
>
I am wonderfully hungry!

Michael

Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'
SHEIN32 minutes ago
> ReplyPermalinkOn Sun, 5 May 2024 23:05:34 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-

>>law-review/
>> Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
>> MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
> LOL! A coon writing about ethics???? Whatever NEXT?
Mangina, there is nothing coon about Jack Marshall!

You are a Nazi.

As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.

You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know you
can not measure up.

You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.

You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.

You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of National
Socialism.

Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you… which is why you choose minor children
as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent adults in a
consensually sexual way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a
helpless victim, be it a prepubescent boy, or a patient in a mental
hospital.

That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or honest
about it.

Michael

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>
>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-law-review/
>>>
>>>
>>> Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
>>> MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>>
>>>
>>> I gave a legal ethics seminar 90 minutes after finding my wife dead, and
>>> these infants are too traumatized to take their exams because of a
>>> “horrific time on campus” and their “level of distress”:
>>>
>>>
>>> They don’t know the meaning of the word “professionalism” (my seminar
>>> topic), and until they learn it and understand their duty to practice it
>>> as lawyers, these students, supposedly the best of Columbia’s best, are
>>> not fit to practice law.
>>>
>>> Jonathan Turley didn’t mince words, and he has be a master word-mincer,
>>> regarding this weenie-ism, writing, “Outside of the Columbia Law Review
>>> offices is a thing called life. It is neither predictable nor
>>> comfortable. We enter the lives of our clients when they are often
>>> failing apart. We have to bring our skills and support at those moments
>>> without the assistance of a trauma tent or emotional coach. We also
>>> cannot ask judges for postponements to allow us to process the stress of
>>> the moment.” He continued, “[O]ur clients look to us for strength not
>>> fragility in such moments. The response from Columbia Law School should
>>> be simple: see you at the exams.”
>>>
>>> Bingo. Meanwhile, the ethics dunces at the Ethics Alarms Unethical
>>> Website of the Century, Above the Law, reacted with its usual almost
>>> infallible ability to get every issue wrong while deriding the more
>>> competent analysts who got it right, writing, “As predictable as night
>>> follows day, right-wing troll outlets are already mocking Columbia law
>>> students for talking about “violence” and being “irrevocably shaken.”
>>> But beyond the smug posturing, there’s not so much a substantive counter
>>> to the arguments laid out in the letter.”
>>>
>>> Whatever language that last sentence is supposed to be in…
>>>
>>> Sure there’s a substantive counter; Turley made it. “Outside of the
>>> Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life.”
>>
>> And He Who is the life (John 14:6) is also the Prince of Peace (Isaiah
>> 9:6) so that in Him, we have perfect (Matt 5:48) peace (Galatians
>> 5:22-23).
>
> You got that right!
>
>>
>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
>> hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
>> appetite for food right now too.
>>
>> So how are you ?
>
> I am wonderfully hungry!

While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.

Laus DEO !

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> someone eternally (Mark 3:29) condemned by GOD whined:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>
>>>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
>>>> hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
>>>> appetite for food right now too.
>>>>
>>>> So how are you ?
>>>
>>> I am wonderfully hungry!

Source:
https://narkive.com/GCjXe8Za.4

>> LIE.

To write that the Holy Spirit, Who is the Spirit of truth, helps us
lie is to again blaspheme (Mark 3:29) against Him.

When we say/write that we're wonderfully hungry, we are speaking "the
truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" with GOD's Help,
Who is the Holy Spirit, Who is the Spirit of truth, because it is
written that GOD says HE is "I am" (Exodus 3:14) and that we are
"wonderfully made" (Psalm 139:14) by GOD, Who did eat the piece of
broiled fish ( https://bit.ly/Lk2442 ) to prove that He is living as
our #1 Example of living http://WonderfullyHungry.org as we are
blessed right now (Luke 6:21a) by the truth (John 14:6).

HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-law-review/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
>>>> MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I gave a legal ethics seminar 90 minutes after finding my wife dead, and
>>>> these infants are too traumatized to take their exams because of a
>>>> “horrific time on campus” and their “level of distress”:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They don’t know the meaning of the word “professionalism” (my seminar
>>>> topic), and until they learn it and understand their duty to practice it
>>>> as lawyers, these students, supposedly the best of Columbia’s best, are
>>>> not fit to practice law.
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan Turley didn’t mince words, and he has be a master word-mincer,
>>>> regarding this weenie-ism, writing, “Outside of the Columbia Law Review
>>>> offices is a thing called life. It is neither predictable nor
>>>> comfortable. We enter the lives of our clients when they are often
>>>> failing apart. We have to bring our skills and support at those moments
>>>> without the assistance of a trauma tent or emotional coach. We also
>>>> cannot ask judges for postponements to allow us to process the stress of
>>>> the moment.” He continued, “[O]ur clients look to us for strength not
>>>> fragility in such moments. The response from Columbia Law School should
>>>> be simple: see you at the exams.”
>>>>
>>>> Bingo. Meanwhile, the ethics dunces at the Ethics Alarms Unethical
>>>> Website of the Century, Above the Law, reacted with its usual almost
>>>> infallible ability to get every issue wrong while deriding the more
>>>> competent analysts who got it right, writing, “As predictable as night
>>>> follows day, right-wing troll outlets are already mocking Columbia law
>>>> students for talking about “violence” and being “irrevocably shaken.”
>>>> But beyond the smug posturing, there’s not so much a substantive counter
>>>> to the arguments laid out in the letter.”
>>>>
>>>> Whatever language that last sentence is supposed to be in…
>>>>
>>>> Sure there’s a substantive counter; Turley made it. “Outside of the
>>>> Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life.”
>>>
>>> And He Who is the life (John 14:6) is also the Prince of Peace (Isaiah
>>> 9:6) so that in Him, we have perfect (Matt 5:48) peace (Galatians
>>> 5:22-23).
>>
>> You got that right!
>>
>>>
>>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
>>> hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
>>> appetite for food right now too.
>>>
>>> So how are you ?
>>
>> I am wonderfully hungry!
>
> While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
> 8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
> 17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
> COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
> Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
> Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
> always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
> including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
> all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
> the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
>
> Laus DEO !
>
Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.

Michael

Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'
SHEINabout 11 hours ago
>On Mon, 6 May 2024 06:51:56 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
>> Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface'
>> SHEIN32 minutes ago
>>> LOL! A coon writing about ethics???? Whatever NEXT?
>> Mangina, there is nothing coon about Jack Marshall!
> Needledick, he IS a coon....just like Chrissie Morton. And just as
> EXEMPT from ethics as YOU.
Nithing, there is nothing coon about Jack nor Chris.

And I will always remember how Chris dominated you and humiliated you!
>> You are a Nazi.
> You are a gook.
That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.

You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.

Bill explains what nithings are.

http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446

Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings

by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”

We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”

We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings

Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,

The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.

A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.

The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”

The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”

"Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.

The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.

This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.

In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.

Michael Ejercito wrote:
> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>> HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>> Michael Ejercito wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> https://ethicsalarms.com/2024/05/05/unethical-quote-of-the-week-the-columbia-law-review/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Unethical Quote of the Week: The Columbia Law Review
>>>>> MAY 5, 2024 / JACK MARSHALL
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I gave a legal ethics seminar 90 minutes after finding my wife dead, and
>>>>> these infants are too traumatized to take their exams because of a
>>>>> “horrific time on campus” and their “level of distress”:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> They don’t know the meaning of the word “professionalism” (my seminar
>>>>> topic), and until they learn it and understand their duty to practice it
>>>>> as lawyers, these students, supposedly the best of Columbia’s best, are
>>>>> not fit to practice law.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jonathan Turley didn’t mince words, and he has be a master word-mincer,
>>>>> regarding this weenie-ism, writing, “Outside of the Columbia Law Review
>>>>> offices is a thing called life. It is neither predictable nor
>>>>> comfortable. We enter the lives of our clients when they are often
>>>>> failing apart. We have to bring our skills and support at those moments
>>>>> without the assistance of a trauma tent or emotional coach. We also
>>>>> cannot ask judges for postponements to allow us to process the stress of
>>>>> the moment.” He continued, “[O]ur clients look to us for strength not
>>>>> fragility in such moments. The response from Columbia Law School should
>>>>> be simple: see you at the exams.”
>>>>>
>>>>> Bingo. Meanwhile, the ethics dunces at the Ethics Alarms Unethical
>>>>> Website of the Century, Above the Law, reacted with its usual almost
>>>>> infallible ability to get every issue wrong while deriding the more
>>>>> competent analysts who got it right, writing, “As predictable as night
>>>>> follows day, right-wing troll outlets are already mocking Columbia law
>>>>> students for talking about “violence” and being “irrevocably shaken.”
>>>>> But beyond the smug posturing, there’s not so much a substantive counter
>>>>> to the arguments laid out in the letter.”
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever language that last sentence is supposed to be in…
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure there’s a substantive counter; Turley made it. “Outside of the
>>>>> Columbia Law Review offices is a thing called life.”
>>>>
>>>> And He Who is the life (John 14:6) is also the Prince of Peace (Isaiah
>>>> 9:6) so that in Him, we have perfect (Matt 5:48) peace (Galatians
>>>> 5:22-23).
>>>
>>> You got that right!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, I am wonderfully hungry for food right now (Luke 6:21a) and
>>>> hope you, Michael, and others reading this, also have a healthy
>>>> appetite for food right now too.
>>>>
>>>> So how are you ?
>>>
>>> I am wonderfully hungry!
>>
>> While wonderfully hungry in the Holy Spirit, Who causes (Deuteronomy
>> 8:3) us to hunger, I note that you, Michael, are rapture ready (Luke
>> 17:37 means no COVID just as eagles circling over their food have no
>> COVID) and pray (2 Chronicles 7:14) that our Everlasting (Isaiah 9:6)
>> Father in Heaven continues to give us "much more" (Luke 11:13) Holy
>> Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23) so that we'd have much more of His Help to
>> always say/write that we're "wonderfully hungry" in **all** ways
>> including especially caring to "convince it forward" (John 15:12) with
>> all glory (Psalm112:1) to GOD (aka HaShem, Elohim, Abba, DEO), in
>> the name (John 16:23) of LORD Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Amen.
>>
>> Laus DEO !
>
> Thank you for noting that I have no COVID.

Just please do likewise as our LORD Jesus & I have done for you,
Michael, and http://go.WDJW.net/ConvinceItForward (John 15:12).

> Quack Andrew B. Chung = SHEIN = Anita = jew paedophile BARRY 'jewface' SHEINa day ago
> ReplyPermalinkOn Mon, 6 May 2024 19:19:58 -0700, NOT Michael Ejercito
> ...
> Needledick, they are BOTH coons. Black as the Ace of Spades!
> Post by Michael Ejercito
> And I will always remember how Chris dominated you and humiliated you!
> And I will always remembter kicking Chrissie Morton off Usenet. His
> flatnosed coon face hasn't been seen here for over 20 YEARS!
You kicked no one.

>> That would be better than being a Nazi nithing.
> How the fuck CAN it be, gook? I'm WHITE and you're an Asiatic
> shitskin!
The following article explains your pathology.

http://archive.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/03/11/historys_oldest_hatred/

History's oldest hatred
By Jeff Jacoby
Globe Columnist / March 11, 2009
Email|Print|Single Page||Text size – +

ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so
it is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer
"anti-Semitism" - a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or
Jew-hatred - is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never
had anything to do with Semites or being Semitic.

Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable as anti-Semitism.
"The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan, religious, and secular
societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis Prager in "Why the Jews?,"
their classic study of anti-Semitism. "Fascists have accused them of
being Communists, and Communists have branded them capitalists. Jews who
live in non-Jewish societies have been accused of having dual loyalties,
while Jews who live in the Jewish state have been condemned as
'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied, and rich Jews are resented. Jews have
been branded as both rootless cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews
who assimilate have been called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay
together spark hatred for remaining separate."

There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the king:

"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among . . . all the
provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it be
written that they be destroyed."

When the king agrees, Haman makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and
destroy all the Jews, the young and the elderly, children and women, in
one day . . . and to take their property for plunder."

What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism - just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the Church
or Islam, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and Soviet
commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the president of
Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state, when firebombs
are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and Chicago, it is not
because Jews deserve to be victimized.

Many Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. They are the
object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the haters'
rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What do those who vilify Jews as greedy bankers have in
common with those who revile them as fiendish Bolsheviks? Nothing, save
an irrational obsession with Jews.

At one point, Haman lets the mask slip. He boasts to his friends and
family of "the glory of his riches, and the great number of his sons,
and everything in which the king had promoted him and elevated him."
Still, he seethes with rage and frustration: "Yet all this is worthless
to me so long as I see Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate."
That is the unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend
in, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting there -
undigested, unassimilated, and therefore unbearable.

Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did
Hitler and Arafat, so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his professional achievements. Under it all, however, it is
the Jew's Jewishness that the anti-Semite cannot abide.

With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their role
in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures too,
as obsessive and indestructible - and deadly - as ever.