Rocksolid Light

News from da outaworlds

mail  files  register  groups  login

Message-ID:  

You will be the last person to buy a Chrysler.

sci / sci.environment / Re: Glacial History of Michigan: How did we get our Great Lakes?

SubjectAuthor
o Re: Glacial History of Michigan: How did we get our Great Lakes?clams casino

1
Subject: Re: Glacial History of Michigan: How did we get our Great Lakes?
From: clams casino
Newsgroups: alt.home.repair, sci.environment, alt.global-warming, alt.conspiracy
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 20:29 UTC
References: 1
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: cc@invalid.cc (clams casino)
Newsgroups: alt.home.repair,sci.environment,alt.global-warming,alt.conspiracy
Subject: Re: Glacial History of Michigan: How did we get our Great Lakes?
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:29:57 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <vjfh43$2u07r$2@dont-email.me>
References: <675b168e$2$212408$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 21:29:55 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7ae2e6f6635d632a45f3ee60d9aa7ea6";
logging-data="3080443"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ZN3uXFmEECdInexa4cPYMITgfTBOMghg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2HVEhVzGJ3zfL0MoZF/QE0riMX0=
In-Reply-To: <675b168e$2$212408$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
Content-Language: en-US
View all headers

On 12/12/2024 9:59 AM, Al Goar wrote:
> Did you know climate change started in Michigan over 2 million years
> ago, long before people had gas stoves and an internal combustion cars?
>
>
> https://www.mucc.org/glacial-history-of-michigan-how-did-we-get-our-great-lakes
>
>
> Looks like the fear-mongering Democrats are lying about the reason for
> climate change.
> If a Democrat's lips are moving, they're lying.

_ALWAYS!_

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/sci_tech/2000/climate_change/1023334.stm

Negative feedback

The global general circulation models which simulate significant amounts
of human-induced warming are incorrectly structured to give this
positive feedback loop.

Their internal model assumptions are thus not realistic.

As human-induced greenhouse gases rise, global-averaged upper-level
atmospheric water vapour and thin cirrus should be expected to decrease
not increase.

Water vapour and cirrus cloudiness should be thought of as a negative
rather than a positive feedback to human-induced - or anthropogenic
greenhouse gas increases.

No significant human-induced greenhouse gas warming can occur with such
a negative feedback loop.

1

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor