Rocksolid Light

News from da outaworlds

mail  files  register  groups  login

Message-ID:  

He jests at scars who never felt a wound. -- Shakespeare, "Romeo and Juliet, II. 2"

sci / sci.engr.color / Re: HDR?

SubjectAuthor
* HDR?Dale
`* Re: HDR?nospam
 `- Re: HDR?Dale

1
Subject: HDR?
From: Dale
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital, sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing
Organization: https://www.dalekelly.org/
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 18:09 UTC
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dale@dalekelly.org (Dale)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital,sci.engr.color,sci.image.processing
Subject: HDR?
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 13:09:54 -0500
Organization: https://www.dalekelly.org/
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <s20ghi$4o2$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 18:09:54 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3a21d84ce16572de7dbbdf145b8d4e69";
logging-data="4866"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18vFYigLtuBk32FRUnXVGu+6kYBHIfO5d8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.8.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wnr2IkUw8AQ3WthlQugTkRDvAjA=
Content-Language: en-US
X-Mozilla-News-Host: snews://newsipv6.altopia.com/
View all headers

How does the color gamut of High Dynamic Range (HDR)
televisions/monitors compare to wide gamut working spaces?

Or a modern ideal print? A projected transparency film?

Is there a HDR standard? Where can I find it?

--
Dale -> https://www.dalekelly.org/
Universalist <-> Mystic <-> Medium

Subject: Re: HDR?
From: nospam
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital, sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 18:15 UTC
References: 1
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: nospam@nospam.invalid (nospam)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital,sci.engr.color,sci.image.processing
Subject: Re: HDR?
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 13:15:16 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <060320211315164187%nospam@nospam.invalid>
References: <s20ghi$4o2$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="311e30674ed06f457227c7170fa47030";
logging-data="6976"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19rETeYtpNigh/aR60jJMk8"
User-Agent: Thoth/1.9.0 (Mac OS X)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gtAs6zOLVThyUdz2B/gQC6eo3sM=
View all headers

In article <s20ghi$4o2$1@dont-email.me>, Dale <dale@dalekelly.org>
wrote:

> How does the color gamut of High Dynamic Range (HDR)
> televisions/monitors compare to wide gamut working spaces?

depends on the tv/monitor and the working space.

> Or a modern ideal print? A projected transparency film?

prints and transparencies can't come anywhere close to wide gamut or
hdr.

> Is there a HDR standard?

more than one.

> Where can I find it?

on the internet.

Subject: Re: HDR?
From: Dale
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital, sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing
Organization: https://www.dalekelly.org/
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 18:58 UTC
References: 1 2
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: dale@dalekelly.org (Dale)
Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital,sci.engr.color,sci.image.processing
Subject: Re: HDR?
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 13:58:33 -0500
Organization: https://www.dalekelly.org/
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <s20jco$q8g$1@dont-email.me>
References: <s20ghi$4o2$1@dont-email.me>
<060320211315164187%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 18:58:32 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3a21d84ce16572de7dbbdf145b8d4e69";
logging-data="26896"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX193AHmHyQvpP8i2L1esxtlU2xjaw7wycgI="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/78.8.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:x4HzJbpZ+e8O2z7MY2jLvCW5TRg=
In-Reply-To: <060320211315164187%nospam@nospam.invalid>
Content-Language: en-US
View all headers

On 3/6/2021 1:15 PM, nospam wrote:
> In article <s20ghi$4o2$1@dont-email.me>, Dale <dale@dalekelly.org>
> wrote:
>
>> How does the color gamut of High Dynamic Range (HDR)
>> televisions/monitors compare to wide gamut working spaces?
>
> depends on the tv/monitor and the working space.
>
>> Or a modern ideal print? A projected transparency film?
>
> prints and transparencies can't come anywhere close to wide gamut or
> hdr.
>
>> Is there a HDR standard?
>
> more than one.
>
>> Where can I find it?
>
> on the internet.
>

Thank You !

--
Dale -> https://www.dalekelly.org/
Universalist <-> Mystic <-> Medium

1

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor