Notably though, can you actually aim light at a semiconductor wafer while making it? Well, the photolithography template is a light aiming thing, and there is likely published material on using a lasers to do things on chip features right on the wafer while it is being manufactured, so this brings up, can you illuminate a wafer, then fill the chamber with CVD gas, then have the gas react with the wafers surface based ont he light you just illuminated it with; some spin polarized gases stay spin polarized for 15 minutes so that is supportive, At some wavelengths, the pure crystals of wafers could be treated as lenses for lasers that shine through to the wafer treatment surface from underneath, at some geometries of shining a laser, or a planar array of spin polarized light (a thing that is different than a banch of parallel lasers, or also different, but possibly producible with a diffration grating and a laser making an array of points), having the light illuminate the wafer obliquely from the side could be done at less than a millimeter above the surface, minimizing beamspread from the CVD gas having a refractive index; also possible is that noting CVD gas has a refractive index, at some applications, different concentrations of CVD gas could be used that have different refractive indexes, so if crystal growth velocity is adjustable with photonic and spin photonic, and reynolds number gas swirl technology that vary surface charge as well as actual CVD gas concentration then it might be possible to grow semiconductors just as well even if CVD gas concentration varies across an order of magnitude, giving an order of magnitude greater transparency and light spatial, intensity, coherence, and other attribute nondivergence

I do not know, but it is possible that if you spin polarize something its emissions and absorption spectra are different so if you shine two lights at a material, one that changes the spin of the atoms at the material, and the other that gives the material a photoelectric effect charge boost that then causes chemical reactivity, that you can change the kinds of things the material will react with, when it will react, if that is

It might be possible to do a raster or parallel version of quantum camera spin customization of spatial things at making semiconductors as well, where a mere billion feature quantum camera spin detector and actualizing photosensor chip, used repeatedly as scanned, at a 10 billion times ten billion feature 300 mm wafer with the features being built on it is used, possibly with photonic spin observations being made quintillions of times a second (noting picosecond lasers exist, and some kind of picohertz elecronics exist to drive them)

Making quantum cameras with 100 picometer resolution or finer causes finer feature size at the actual size of the semiconductor device the fab is making to experience spatial spin modifications (quantum camera), geometry, and possibly plasmonic feature stimulation at the semiconductor crystal surface five powers of two eentsier than than the features being produced, or optimally, makes creating eentsier feature sizes possible; I read 3 nanometer semiconductor size feature are being scaled up, 1 nannometers is this possible now noting 1 nanometer technology could be used if you are willing to make a few hundred and keep some, or possibly keep a couple at 300 picometer technology; you could make 1 nanometer or 300 picometer feature sized photodetectors at a 300 nm wafer, with three or 8 times the resolution of a 3nm process wafer, or imaginably, something like very custom 100 picometer feature UV laser process produced chip, where you make a few thousand and get one you can use, but its ability to resolve and instantiate photon spin polarization and other observation things (3, 800, 400, 200, 100 picometer) five powers of two tinier than a 3 nanometer process chip causes even greater tininess, feature finess, size, shape making, and repeatability at the observed integrated circuit being made at the fab; not only are tinier features possible, but faster production of the 3 nanometer size feature semicodnuctors is also possible heightening fab productivity

There are UV emitting quantum dots, it is imaginable that these, perhaps just from being made an order of magnitude different sized, at 300 picometer rather than 2.5 nanometer, could make higher wavelength radiation

It is possible that at light there is some kind of thing where if you know (measure or make) some things then you know, or tend to not know others. It is possible that if you know something like spin (up/down), or polarization (linear/angle, circular, other) of light you might know more, or possibly less, about its wavelength. It might be possible to make a light emitter for semiconductor manufacturing (wavelenth feature size new technology) where perhaps you do not actually know where between UV and visible its wavelength is, but as a result of observing some other thing like spin, polarization, evanescence presence or distance, source geometry/simultaneity thing (kind of like double slits possibly having a wavelength that is definably determinably at some range because if the two slits are wider apart than some number of wavelengths then the ~~~~ per nanometer are some particular size range, so if you use slits of some kind to look at white light photons you know nothing about, with some spacing of slit and see it then you are “certain” knowledge of-producing, at least some energy at an energy regime of a certain ~~~~~ size. Notably, at something like the quantum camera, observing it at the light sensor might make it so energy of just that ~~~~ size has an actual amount of ergs at the other thing the quantum entangled (linked) photons are shining on; so instead of light going on a chip (camera sensor at New sceintist, or described here as the actual wafer surface of a semiconductor being made) and a figurine, you put light on a chip and a thing (rather than a figurine) from made up of a bunch of slits, then you look at what comes from the bunch of slits, and that means that at the chip (camera or the thing being made at a fab) photons of that ~~~~ size and ergs are, at some quantity, being deposited; noting picosecond lasers exist, a person doing things to the surface of semiconductor, like one being manufactured, could do this slits make energy ~~~~~ size and ergs thing trillions of times per second, causing accumulative change from the energy change at a crystal being cumulatively deposited or even etched; the nifty thing is that you have illuminated the wafer you are making with wide spectrum white illumination, and just immanentizing the part that is far enough at the far UV to make features that are tinier than 2019 light size and photolithography feature size, building up something billions or trillions of times per second, at what, side-observationally (without knowing the actual wavelength), have to be, really high frequency waves causes semiconductor features to be built up or etched out

Using a quintillion optical sensor wafer to cause spins to be defined, or undefined at another surface, notably the surface of semiconductor manufacturing process wafer being created, makes it so that the photons that reach the wafer being made are more chemically active, more electrically active, kept from causing charge, so making their neighbors show up up more, or, notably are at a frequency blend which contains, at least, if not more, but at least, the frequency the quantum camera spin topology plane making thing can respond to, then these things can be used to make features at semiconductors, kind of like doing AND, OR, NOT, and possibly XOR of light doing thing at a feature sized spot on a quadrillion feature sized wafer being observed into varied surface charge topology with a quintiliion feature sized photodetecting quantum camera

Supersaturation causes more crystals to grow with less chronological moments, is there a feature size, fineness, regularity, and repeatability preserving way to supersaturate (more CVD gas right there at the wafer surface) a CVD atmosphere right near a wafer, from causing atoms to be stimulated to bunch up, perhaps with solitons (like dissipative solitons), photons, some ambient, all wafer or just surface wave with less than 100 picometer wavelength, but nonspecific location (like illuminating, but not etching, a wafer with UV), perhaps at a chronological varying dose, like some picometer wavelength UV at 100 billion cycles per second to do 10 picometer bunch up layers at the wafer surface (lisening to a ruler wiggle, a 10 cm ruler might sound like acoustic 100 hz, so a 100 billionth of a meter wiggle might be a 10 picometer sized length wiggle, possibly as a standing wave, which could be beneficial as it stays at the preferred wafer location), the 100 billion cycle per second waves could actually be be beamed from beneath the wafer (or from the side), and some wafer materials might even have findable bandpass layers that are extra transmissive of various wavelengths above 100 billion cycles per second; There are industrial process femtosecond lasers so making the waves is a known technology.

GSK: New kind of drug, but I do not know what it does: Drugs, possibly novel ions, ionic few AMU organic chemicals, or even things like lopsided quantum dots with charge anisotropy, could cause beneficial protein or other molecule specific nucleation effects at cytes, and tissues, notably at a variety of body structures, wikipedia notes that actin tubules come from nucleation, “Energy consuming self-organising systems such as the microtubules in cells also show nucleation and growth.” So they could make a bunch of things that are likely to cause nucleation, screen a library of thousands (or millions or billions) of them at a yeast or human tissue biochip, and see which if any any of them caused greater longevity, wellness, as well as healthspan, previously described is how if you genetically engineer yeast to make more green fluorescent protein then the longer it lives, then you can find the longest lived yeast at something like a big array of wells (a billion or more) on a microchip, where each well has a different chemical and yeast growth medium, and a camera looks at the whole array, and then finds the row and column with the brightest glowing (longest lived) yeast at it. 10 million cyte per second microfluidics flow cytometry is also published and that approach could also be used to screen a billion new nucleation drugs as to longevity, wellness, and healthspan effects at a billion yeast in 100 seconds, or a trillion, to produce a high n P value, in 27.7 hours at one machine. Also, lopsided quantum dots, stabilizing molecules (a little like, but perhaps quite different than antioxidants) few amu molecules, as well as things like eentsiest cyclodextrins, topological starches, and things like graphene toruses, and chelation molecules, could see the effect of reducing nucleation at biochip screened libraries on things like yeast and human tissue culture; notably wikipedia says amyloid blobs at alzheimers accumulate from nucleation, so it is possible there are a variety of nucleation reduction effects which could be beneficial at a variety of human body tissues; Interestingly, as to cryopreservation, novel nucleation producers, reducers, or customizers could benefit cryopreservation of human bodies, freezable and thawable living organisims exist, and these may have numerous simultaneous nucleation, causing, reducing, or modulating chemicals besides comparatively macroquantity chemicals like trehalose at them that people could find, and quantify as to cryopreservation benefit.