Notably at DQCE conception and reconception editing different versions of an optimized core genome can be produced and navigated. That is a way to make it so all of the 10,000 sperm and egg samples available at reconception DQCE all have a fully functional eugenics beneficial core shared source.

As previously described, concentrate genes, bulk produce, and sequence, a plurality of times, adding more and more eugenics beneficial genes to the sperms and eggs balstocysts and tissue cultures produced at each cycle of :sperm, egg, blastocyst, gene sequencing of blastocyst, Then accumulate and group these beneficial genes together to produce a multibeneficial sperms or eggs. Use stem cell technology to produce clonal sperm as well as clonal eggs; combine these eggs and sperm, grow to blastocyst, sequence the genes from blastocyst occuring at the new combination; then combine these eugenics concentrated gametes more times to produce sperm as well as eggs with all of the preferred genes. Then sort the created gametes on largest simultaneous number of beneficial gene versions, then stem cell clone the improved and concentrated gamete genetics of eugenics gametes.

Mathematics of DQCE reconception as well as genetics: One approach, previously described as finding the overlap of 99th percentile of optimized individual genetics with 99th percentile optimal societial, with societal specifiable as a society being a bulk effect of a group of phenotypes arising from genomes, genetics and genome, as an approach notes there is a mathematics of getting both right simulataneously.

Finding beneficial environmental goods, or good stock from as-yet-unmeasured genetics and phenotypic determinants: Besides 99th percentile individual genomes and phenotypes, and group-phenotype-formed-societies which could be good-stock sampleable as geographic areas at 99th percentile societies: it is possible the overlap of 99th percentile genome based individual well being and human behaviors frequent at almost all human beings could be basis for genetic sampling to find eugenics beneficial optimums. People who are at the 99th percentile of child well being and resulting child-outcome while being human physiological parents could have a genotypic and phenotypic basis for their optimality; this optimizes and benefits one area of physiological, phenotypic and genomic form doing something, having and raising children, that most humans do. Finding the phenotypes and genotypes of optimality of other things that almost all humans do could contribute to beneficial genetic optimization, eugenics, as well as DQCE reconception technology.

Humans, that is people, also sleep and have mental focus and attentiveness. Genomics of 99th percentile beneficial and enjoyable quality of sleeping as well as 99th percentile ability to focus and/or be receptively alert and attentive, could be areas of human-spanning benefit.

I perceive researchers have measured differences between humans, that is people, at measured quantity and character of moments of perceived enjoyable consciousness. So phenotypically and genetically there is published support that some people exist more than others, that is they have more moments, as well as possibly higher amplitude moments as well as sustained sensations or mental actuality of aware-mind, that they experience as enjoyable. 99th percentile genetics of voluntary enjoyment of presence of mind are a possible eugenics technology item as well; existing, like having children and sleeping is another area where the phenotype of a shared most-all-humans activity has an optimizable genetics.

That brings up an optimization opportunity for a person using DQCE gametes as part of reconception. As the effect of genes and particular genes and other physiological effectors of herditary phenotype and quantifiably measurable behavior, is cumulatively found, and as researchers and technologists think of new kinds of benefits, or features (like doing DQCE reconception to cause more moments of enjoyable awareness) the person specifying the gametes used at their reconception can DQCE modify their gametes retrocausally around those beneficial new features.

Noting the generation of new things, genomic improvement could come from more than enthused preference for better knownthings, as well as genomic solutions to non-optimal things (like DQCE reconception as genetically and phenotypically female dodges selective service at some countries), completely new features could be researched and technologized from the genome, notably the DQCE reconception sperm or other gamete list of choosables.

DQCE could also modify epigenetics, like the chemical environment at conception, in a retrocausally programmable way: another technology at the DQCE (Delayed Quantum Choice Eraser) retrocausal modification of conception, called reconception, is the DQCE gamete technology also having a, technologically derived from actual research, adjustable epigenetic component. If, either surplus or reduced ambient ATP during the blastocyst stage is found to have beneficial effects, then the DQCE mechanism could make it so humans, that is people, could specify the amount of ATP at their reconception, as conception environment. As a technology, not only could 100 studied epigenetic influences and/or chemicals be available for adjustment, it is possible a future addressing of a parallel photonic array form of DQCE could actually produce retrocausally created words or numbers. One reconception option is to have the reconception biology technician or the robot doing what the human biology technician would do, is to order that particular number chemical from a chemical supply company and make it a contributor to the retrocausally enhanced epigenetic environment. It is also possible that the parallel photonic DQCE array produced chemical number could be a generator of any IUPAC chemical structure, for use as a reconception biological technology active ingredient. It is possible that retrocausal epigenetics could provide even more options and customizable benefit to the person, like the 14 year old, modifying their biologically conceived being retrocausally.

Along with the custom chemical DQCE reconception technology, perhaps 100 different well researched chemicals or protocol variants,possibly effecting epigenetics, could be part of DQCE’s adjustability from observing a photon path and then retrocausally changing the path of the photon with a chronologically subsequent (possibly decades “later”) observation, where the photon path is linked at the dynamic moment of the apparatus to which particular gametes and epigenetic variables are then freshly optimized to be.

The math of how many persons, as MWI branch individuals, (versions of you) that experience benefit from DQCE reconception, when figured out, could support some notably beneficial, perhaps standard ways to use the technology. Just thinking, the presence of an artificial intelligence guided companion robot, or even just a (human, that is person), sentience utilized software companion, at that particular person’s life physically and chronologically prior to a reconception action, could cause the person to be re-befriended or raised, by that companion robot again, while the robots software and hardware might be math of MWI unlikely to change;

This thing where some context might be durable and conserved amonst MWI branches could be beneficial at the experience of preference and doing planning and actions. The 14 year old that would like to be socially fluent and talk to their romantic crush, where that crush is a person they actually know of at their MWI branch universe, could possibly structure things at their DQCE reconception so that their crush still existed accessibly to their personal being even after the DQCE reconception. One possibility is unique-genome online conversational addresses. A companion robot urges you to start online chat with the genetically identical person to the person you, prereconception, had a crush on.

Although I do not know MWI math, theoretically she, the romantic crush, would not change her genetics ; these seems particularly true when the 14 year old’s romantic crush is even 1 second older than them: genetically, the other person already exists at the reconceived person’s MWI branch, and could be sought out after reconception.

(A thing that could amplify appreciation for, and contribute to the actual production of reconception would be a popular treatment of an MWI reconception romance, it could get a lift from the popularity of the “groundhog day” movie genre, only the technology is functional, and there are actual things you can do to have things go well with the person you feel affectionate towards)

Technology: how much mutliplexed massively parallel delayed quantum choice eraser structure is possible? At some simple amount; the published first DQCE, you can produce a new output from a different observation of optical path; can you do enough path variation and quantity to code out an ascii sentence? If you can then you can send yourself a note in the past. I have not seen that supported or criticised at anything online or published that I have heard of though.

MWI branch durables: that person to person possible availability is qualitatively different than the general lift of “the romantic reconceived 14 year old going from 50th percentile extroverted to 70th percentile extroverted makes then twice as likely to have an active romantic life, regardless of who with” effect

The production of MWI branch durables, reminds me of math and electronics: If you have a conductor, and insultor, and a semiconductor you can make a variety of different things. Three kinds of things makes a construction kit.. The companion robot being a durable, could have system generating/engineering object generating utility. Another durable might be City. A person conceived at a city might be likely to see particular views, travel particular streetswith some likelihood, or even predictably attend one of a few different possible educational institutions.