Rocksolid Light

News from da outaworlds

mail  files  register  groups  login

Message-ID:  

BOFH excuse #161: monitor VLF leakage


comp / comp.os.linux.advocacy / Re: Study: Vaccines had 'NO Beneficial Effects'

Subject: Re: Study: Vaccines had 'NO Beneficial Effects'
From: Mitchell Holman
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy, talk.politics
Organization: ViperNews - www.vipernews.com
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 13:28 UTC
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.os.linux.advocacy,talk.politics
Subject: Re: Study: Vaccines had 'NO Beneficial Effects'
From: noemail@aol.com (Mitchell Holman)
References: <n50g8jhrhc0sl0s7beius5e82f4ount7ji@4ax.com> <XnsB1A6616BF5517629555@185.151.15.160> <852g8jpj6crsd128vnj2hj5dp8bfr4smnd@4ax.com> <XnsB1A6814BDBFE3629555@185.151.15.190> <2cgg8j9cq2bhh0iloh0es1mj864hube1bl@4ax.com> <XnsB1A6D6079CDEA629555@185.151.15.160> <iuuh8jtsfd4hu8apj1hnpgt45eghaaoifr@4ax.com>
Organization: ViperNews - www.vipernews.com
Message-Id: <XnsB1A7554F4D541629555@185.151.15.190>
User-Agent: Xnews/5.04.25
Lines: 232
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!tr2.iad1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.eu1.usenetexpress.com!news.uzoreto.com!posting.uzoreto.com!not-for-mail
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2024 13:28:38 +0000
Nntp-Posting-Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2024 13:28:38 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 8075
X-Complaints-To: https://www.uzoreto.com/ntd/
View all headers

Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
news:iuuh8jtsfd4hu8apj1hnpgt45eghaaoifr@4ax.com:

> On Sat, 06 Jul 2024 02:07:52 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>news:2cgg8j9cq2bhh0iloh0es1mj864hube1bl@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Fri, 05 Jul 2024 17:48:05 +0000, Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patrriotism.KMA> wrote in
>>>>news:852g8jpj6crsd128vnj2hj5dp8bfr4smnd@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 05 Jul 2024 14:39:05 +0000, Mitchell Holman
<noemail@aol.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>>>>news:n50g8jhrhc0sl0s7beius5e82f4ount7ji@4ax.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Interesting read. More studies are needed though to confirm the
>>>>>>> various theories and data.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Study: Vaccines had �NO Beneficial Effects�
>>>>>>> <https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-
>>news/disease/study-
>>>>va
>>>>>>> ccines-had-no-beneficial-effects/>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> '
>>>>>>> 'YouTube recently removed an interview I participated in with
>>>>>>> Palisades Radio for mentioning this study. I have posted the
video
>>on
>>>>>>> Rumble at the bottom of this article and it can also be found on
X
>>>>and
>>>>>>> Spotify. �Differential Increases in Excess Mortality in the
German
>>>>>>> Federal States During the COVID-19 Pandemic� conducted by
Christof
>>>>>>> Kuhbandner, PhD, Professor of Psychology at the University of
>>>>>>> Regensburg in Bavaria Germany, and mathematician Prof. Matthias
>>>>>>> Reitzner at Osnabr�ck University, found that COVID-19 vaccines
had
>>>>�no
>>>>>>> beneficial effects� but did increase the mortality rate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why are we prohibited from sharing scientific studies that dispel
>>the
>>>>>>> COVID narrative? This group of German scientists found that
excess
>>>>>>> mortality rates peaked alongside the months with the highest rate
>>of
>>>>>>> vaccinations. �Given the surprising ?nding that a signi?cant
excess
>>>>>>> mortality only begins to appear in 2021, which then doubles in
the
>>>>>>> following year 2022, the question arises which factors might be
>>>>>>> related with this sudden and strong increase in mortality long
>>after
>>>>>>> the start of the pandemic,� the study noted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> �In fact, such a research strategy has already been used in a
>>>>previous
>>>>>>> study where it has been examined whether the excess mortality
>>>>observed
>>>>>>> in the di?erent German federal states in the second half of 2021
>>>>>>> varies with the COVID-19 vaccination rate in a federal state
(Thum
>>>>>>> [32]). According to the results of this study, a signi?cant
>>negative
>>>>>>> correlation was observed, that is, theh igher the vaccination
rate
>>in
>>>>>>> a federal state, the lower the excess mortality, a ?nding that
was
>>>>>>> interpreted in several media as evidence of the e?ectiveness of
the
>>>>>>> vaccinations,� the paper later reads.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> VaccineDeathsGermany
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Areas with fewer vaccinations experienced fewer deaths. The virus
>>>>>>> itself had spread everywhere. We were told that the vaccine was
the
>>>>>>> only method to prevent transmission and infection, only to be
later
>>>>>>> told that the vaccine could do neither. The researchers found
that
>>>>>>> vaccines and the virus itself were the only two variables to
>>account
>>>>>>> for excess mortality over 2020-2022.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> �The results of the correlation analysis show a very clear and
>>simple
>>>>>>> picture: There are only two variables that are systematically
>>related
>>>>>>> to excess mortality: COVID-19 and the vaccination rate. The fact
>>that
>>>>>>> the vaccination rate in the second year of the pandemic is
already
>>>>>>> highly negatively correlated with excess mortality as well as
with
>>>>the
>>>>>>> reported number of COVID-19 deaths and infections in the ?rst
year
>>of
>>>>>>> the pandemic clearly shows that the less a federal state was a?
>>ected
>>>>>>> by COVID in the ?rst pandemic year, the more vaccinations were
>>>>>>> administered. The fact that this negative correlation suddenly
>>>>>>> reverses in the third year of the pandemic clearly shows that a
new
>>>>>>> factor must have suddenly emerged that drove up excess mortality
>>and
>>>>>>> the number of COVID deaths and infections in the federal states
>>that
>>>>>>> were initially least a?ected by COVID-19.�
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pfizer_CEO_Vaccines Limited
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Additional funding is warranted to determine if the COVID-19
>>vaccine
>>>>>>> did, in fact, cause more deaths than the actual virus. Numerous
>>>>>>> studies point to this same correlation but are buried as
>>>>>>> disinformation. Imagine if the public knew that their governments
>>>>>>> permitted, if not forced, them to inject their families with a
>>lethal
>>>>>>> poison.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The vaccine is "lethal poison" which explains
>>>>>>why virtually all doctors got themselves and their
>>>>>>families vaccinated as soon as they could. But they
>>>>>>are just doctors so what do they know, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>AMA survey shows over 96% of doctors
>>>>>>fully vaccinated against COVID-19
>>>>>>JUN 11, 2021
>>>>>>https://tinyurl.com/yvb37xvu
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <LOL> "virtually all doctors?????"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yep,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No, maybe 96% of the 15% of doctors that have anything to do with the
>>> AMA. My primary doctor is not among them. See below:
>>>
>>
>>
>> So far I have posted several
>>sources showing the majority of
>>doctors got vaccinated.
>>
>> You have posted nothing to
>>the contrary.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>except for the ones on chemotherapy
>>>>and otherwise have immune conditions themselves.
>>>>And a few religious nut cases. In Canada the
>>>>figure 95% of doctors getting vaccinated.
>>>>
>>>>https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/6/e080461
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why would anyone in the USA care about what Canadian doctors do.
>>>
>>
>> Covid was a world wide pandemic,
>>it had a world wide response from the
>>world wide medical community.
>>
>
> People, including doctors, in some places, are way more likely to
> follow the directives of the bureaucrats.

So doctors inject themselves and
their families with "lethal poison"
because of "directives from bureaucrats"?

You are making even less sense
than usual.

>
>>
>>Communicating Doctors Responses
>>Persistently Increases Vaccinations
>>June 1 2022
>>
>>Figure 1 shows the distribution of
>>doctors responses. A broad concensus
>>on Covid 19 exists in the medical
>>community: 89% trust the vaccines,
>>90% intend to get vaccinated, and
>>95% intend to recommend to their
>>patients that they take the vaccine
>>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04805-y
>>
>>
>
> I think,

No, you don't.

> perhaps the polling results might be different today, now
> that we know so much of what we've been told is bullshit.

SubjectRepliesAuthor
o Study: Vaccines had 'NO Beneficial Effects'

By: John Smyth on Fri, 5 Jul 2024

47John Smyth

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor