On 2024-11-06, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> On 11/6/24 10:58 AM, pothead wrote:
>> On 2024-11-06, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/5/24 9:15 AM, pothead wrote:
>>>> On 2024-11-05, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 11/4/24 5:01 PM, pothead wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-11-04, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>>>>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> L>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content, other than the
>>>>>>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The media was focused on
>>>>>>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only one senile old man
>>>>>>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is going on around him
>>>>>>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted already by early or
>>>>>>>>>> mail.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <shrug>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Trump will win. Harris has just not shown the decisiveness, the *ownership* of
>>>>>>>>>> the office.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I fear you might be correct.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> NP: Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy the lower
>>>>>>>> prices and closed border?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if Trump
>>>>>>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you $100:
>>>>>>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this wager?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No bill needed.
>>>>>> Just reinstate the Trump policies that Biden/Harris rescinded on day one,...
>>>>>
>>>>> Just which Trump policy has survived Court rulings to make it legal?
>>>>> Go ahead and list them.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> ... continue
>>>>>> building the wall and add to it additional high tech monitoring and all
>>>>>> would be fine.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And you're willing to pay how much more in income taxes to pay for what
>>>>> you want? Put up a number.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why did Biden/Harris/Majorkas claim for 3.5 years that the border was secure?
>>>>>
>>>>> Because CBP encounters were way up. CBP also reported that a lot of the
>>>>> apprehensions were repeats ... the same guy, again & again. I could
>>>>> look up the numbers, but my recollection is that something like 75% were
>>>>> repeats.
>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/4455506-breaking-down-the-senate-border-bill-and-why-it-has-no-chance-of-passing/>
>>>>>
>>>>> No chance of passing isn't the same as saying if it would start to fix
>>>>> the immigration problems or not. Try again.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -hh
>>>>>
>>>> Interesting that a libby is all of a sudden interested in policies being legal.
>>>
>>> Oh, you'll find me stating "Rule of Law" many times in the archives.
>>> Case in point, here's one from over a decade ago:
>>>
>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/6iliw4eou5o/m/0fV_yx55dWsJ>
>>>
>>>> Were you singing the same tune when Biden ignored the courts to find
>>>> a method to forgive student loans?
>>>
>>>
>>> Only comment I've made on that subject was to fact-check chrisv a year
>>> ago: he incorrectly claim that lost interest went to taxpayers. It
>>> doesn't: it goes to the banks servicing the loans.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Anyway the main policies such as:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Remain in Mexico
>>>> 2. No catch and release in US.
>>>>
>>>> As for legal challenges, remain in Mexico was ended by Biden, challenged in SCOTUS
>>>> who ruled in Biden's favor to end the policy however it was blocked by a federal judge
>>>> who ruled Biden did not have the authority to end the program.
>>>>
>>>> Either way, it was working.
>>>
>>> Except that the Judiciary Branch said it wasn't legal.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Instead of churning numbers, which suck BTW, why not read what the states and border
>>>> patrol think of Joe Biden and his open border.
>>>
>>> Before Trump spoke up, CPB was in favor of the 2024 Bipartisan Bill.
>>>
>>>
>>>> It's a disaster that his administration, including Harris, created and are 100% responsible
>>>> for.
>>>
>>> Immigration has been a political football for longer than Biden has been
>>> alive. And only a dishonest partisan blames the Executive Branch when
>>> the Judicial Branch concludes that a policy is unconstitutional.
>>>
>>>
>>> -hh
>>>
>> It hasn't been a political football nor a problem prior to Biden taking office
>
>
> Bull Shit.
>
> Trump, 2016: "Migrant Caravans!"

So?
He was correct.
He was also correct when he stated that we are not getting the brightest and best
coming into our country.
Fact.

>
>> and turning that problem into at least 21 million migrants into the US which
>> is unprecedented.
>
>
> As I asked chrisv (which he "snipped unread" on):
> just what is the problem with having these immigrants? Be specific.

Huh?
They are unvetted.
We have no idea who these people are, what their past is and why they want to
come here.
You sure don't sound like a military person.
Perhaps a civie?

LEGAL MIGRATION is the answer.
Stand in line like millions of others have for centuries.

And yes, the system needs a major overhaul.
It really does.

> And reconcile it with what I've already said, including how the The
> Idaho Dairymen’s Association estimated that 89% of their state’s on-site
> dairy workers are foreign-born: do you have enough of an education on
> Supply & Demand to have a clue for what will happen to the availability
> and price of milk if 9 out of 10 workers get deported?

Fine.
Let them apply legally.
Nobody is claiming migrants are bad, they buiit America however it
needs to be controlled.
Just letting anyone in who manages to answer the questions on an iPhone app
is absolutely crazy.

See NYC for details and many examples.

> Or is economics another subject you flunked, along with Engineering?

Wrong.
I earned a BSEE with a minor in physics.
So essentially 2 degrees.
Graduated with a 3.7 GPA, yea I was a bit lazy back then.
I had a job 3 months before I graduated.
Oh yea, all while working to pay my way through college because at the time I was
the wrong color to get free money. And that's basically what the University told me.
Next.
>
>> Biden/Harris own this mess.
>
>
> Of these alleged 21 million migrants, just how many of them were already
> in the USA before 2021? Cite your sources.

Who cares?
If they are here illegally they are criminals.

>
>> And when terrorists or bad actors in general start their attacks from within the US
>> Biden and Harris will own that coming disaster as well.
>
>
> As opposed to Russia putting bombs in Western cargo aircraft last week?

Under Biden.
Didn't happen under Trump.
In fact the world was at peace under Trump.

>
>> It's not a matter of if but when.
>> And, sadly, it will make October 7th look like a day at Disney in comparison.
>>
>
> Oh but didn't you hear? Solving all wars is "easy" and will be done
> within 48 hours after he assumes office ...

Trying to solve the war problem even if failing is far better than having a policy of appeasement
which does nothing but increase the likelihood of wars in the first place.

See Joe Biden for that one.

> ... right after the Healthcare & Infrastructure plans are published from
> their 2021 due dates, of course. /s

Infrastucture I will give you as something needs to be done, however the Biden
Infrastructure bill is a train wreck.
As for health care, it depends.
Obama care has been a disaster for most.
If not for RINO McCain it would have been gone under Trump.

Personally, I find it appalling that the US does not take care of it's seniors and
citizens, at least the legal ones, medically.
Socialized medicine is not the answer but something does need to be done.

> So just like I said to Skeeter:
>
> "On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you
> $100: care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this
> wager?"

It's all about "lived economics", meaning how the economic situation of the country
affects the average person each day.
ie: food, mortgage, fuel, heating etc.

> I'm now making the same offer to you too, Pothead.

I don't need your $100.
And I don't give a shit about your indicators and neither does anyone else
paying 20% or more for groceries than they did in 2020 under Trump.

Even Biden tried the Bidenomics is working routine early in his campaign and
his staff told him to knock it off because the people were not buying it.

> So how about it, Pothead? Do you actually believe in what you say to be
> willing to put IRL money where your mouth is and offer a reciprocation?

Nope.
I'm not getting in the middle of your wars.

Biden/Harris screwed the entire country into the ground. If Trump can fix it, great.
If he can't, it's time to move on to another plan.

> Or will you be another coward and dodge, like Skeeter already has?
> -hh

Cut the juvenile crap already.
Please.

--
pothead

See Kamala Harris best interview ever.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363352689112
She really knocks this one out of the park.
Don't you agree?