On 11/6/24 4:02 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vggerk$1ng26$5@dont-email.me>,
> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>
>> On 11/6/24 10:58 AM, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2024-11-06, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>> On 11/5/24 9:15 AM, pothead wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-11-05, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/4/24 5:01 PM, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-11-04, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> L>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content, other than the
>>>>>>>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The media was focused on
>>>>>>>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only one senile old man
>>>>>>>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is going on around him
>>>>>>>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted already by early or
>>>>>>>>>>> mail.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <shrug>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Trump will win. Harris has just not shown the decisiveness, the *ownership* of
>>>>>>>>>>> the office.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I fear you might be correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> NP: Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy the lower
>>>>>>>>> prices and closed border?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if Trump
>>>>>>>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you $100:
>>>>>>>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this wager?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No bill needed.
>>>>>>> Just reinstate the Trump policies that Biden/Harris rescinded on day one,...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just which Trump policy has survived Court rulings to make it legal?
>>>>>> Go ahead and list them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... continue
>>>>>>> building the wall and add to it additional high tech monitoring and all
>>>>>>> would be fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And you're willing to pay how much more in income taxes to pay for what
>>>>>> you want? Put up a number.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why did Biden/Harris/Majorkas claim for 3.5 years that the border was secure?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because CBP encounters were way up. CBP also reported that a lot of the
>>>>>> apprehensions were repeats ... the same guy, again & again. I could
>>>>>> look up the numbers, but my recollection is that something like 75% were
>>>>>> repeats.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/4455506-breaking-down-the-senate-border-bill-and-why-it-has-no-chance-of-passing/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No chance of passing isn't the same as saying if it would start to fix
>>>>>> the immigration problems or not. Try again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting that a libby is all of a sudden interested in policies being legal.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, you'll find me stating "Rule of Law" many times in the archives.
>>>> Case in point, here's one from over a decade ago:
>>>>
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/6iliw4eou5o/m/0fV_yx55dWsJ>
>>>>
>>>>> Were you singing the same tune when Biden ignored the courts to find
>>>>> a method to forgive student loans?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Only comment I've made on that subject was to fact-check chrisv a year
>>>> ago: he incorrectly claim that lost interest went to taxpayers. It
>>>> doesn't: it goes to the banks servicing the loans.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Anyway the main policies such as:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Remain in Mexico
>>>>> 2. No catch and release in US.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for legal challenges, remain in Mexico was ended by Biden, challenged in SCOTUS
>>>>> who ruled in Biden's favor to end the policy however it was blocked by a federal judge
>>>>> who ruled Biden did not have the authority to end the program.
>>>>>
>>>>> Either way, it was working.
>>>>
>>>> Except that the Judiciary Branch said it wasn't legal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Instead of churning numbers, which suck BTW, why not read what the states and border
>>>>> patrol think of Joe Biden and his open border.
>>>>
>>>> Before Trump spoke up, CPB was in favor of the 2024 Bipartisan Bill.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> It's a disaster that his administration, including Harris, created and are 100% responsible
>>>>> for.
>>>>
>>>> Immigration has been a political football for longer than Biden has been
>>>> alive. And only a dishonest partisan blames the Executive Branch when
>>>> the Judicial Branch concludes that a policy is unconstitutional.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -hh
>>>>
>>> It hasn't been a political football nor a problem prior to Biden taking office
>>
>>
>> Bull Shit.
>>
>> Trump, 2016: "Migrant Caravans!"
>
> Like the one headed this way right now?

The ones that mysteriously disappear as soon as Trump was in office.

>>> and turning that problem into at least 21 million migrants into the US which
>>> is unprecedented.
>>
>>
>> As I asked chrisv (which he "snipped unread" on):
>> just what is the problem with having these immigrants? Be specific.
>
> To many and we are paying them instead of our own.

Conveniently vague.

FYI, they're paying over $50B/year into Social Security & Medicare that
they'll never eligible to collect on. Plus they're paying into State
sales & fuel taxes too.

>>
>> And reconcile it with what I've already said, including how the The
>> Idaho Dairymen?s Association estimated that 89% of their state?s on-site
>> dairy workers are foreign-born: do you have enough of an education on
>> Supply & Demand to have a clue for what will happen to the availability
>> and price of milk if 9 out of 10 workers get deported?
>
> No matter. Enter legally and we're fine with it.
>>
>> Or is economics another subject you flunked, along with Engineering?
>
> Obviously the current admin flunked.

Flunkee claims ...just what?

>>> Biden/Harris own this mess.
>>
>>
>> Of these alleged 21 million migrants, just how many of them were already
>> in the USA before 2021? Cite your sources.
>
> Prove him wrong.

Easily done in part, for the total's been estimated at 12M as per the
below cite, but that's the total, not delineated by arrival year.

As such, over 57% of your unsubstantiated claim's "problem" has been
wiped out before we even look to see if we can ID arrival#s to an
Administration.

<https://reason.org/commentary/illegal-immigrants-are-paying/>

>>> And when terrorists or bad actors in general start their attacks from within the US
>>> Biden and Harris will own that coming disaster as well.
>>
>>
>> As opposed to Russia putting bombs in Western cargo aircraft last week?
>
> And? What does that have to do with anything?

Because you invoked "But Terrorists!" as yet another diversion attempt.

>>> It's not a matter of if but when.
>>> And, sadly, it will make October 7th look like a day at Disney in comparison.
>>>
>>
>> Oh but didn't you hear? Solving all wars is "easy" and will be done
>> within 48 hours after he assumes office ...
>
> No doubt.

Oh, so you don't believe him either. What do you think the likelihood
is for the apartheid state of Israel to wipe Palestine off the map?

>>
>> ... right after the Healthcare & Infrastructure plans are published from
>> their 2021 due dates, of course. /s
>>
>
> The ones the left hid?
>
>> So just like I said to Skeeter:
>
> Hi.
>>
>> "On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you
>> $100: care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this
>> wager?"
>>
>> I'm now making the same offer to you too, Pothead.
>>
>> So how about it, Pothead? Do you actually believe in what you say to be
>> willing to put IRL money where your mouth is and offer a reciprocation?
>
> You don't have a $100 to spare.

As if I'd risk my reputation online for only $100.

>>
>> Or will you be another coward and dodge, like Skeeter already has?
>>
> Shit my team won. What else do you need from me?

Nothing to do with who won the election, but the promises that they made
which you clearly believed. Are you now bailing out on believing them?

-hh