Rocksolid Light

News from da outaworlds

mail  files  register  groups  login

Message-ID:  

You will overcome the attacks of jealous associates.


comp / comp.os.linux.advocacy / Re: Thousands of sex-change surgeries performed on minors in 5-year period

Subject: Re: Thousands of sex-change surgeries performed on minors in 5-year period
From: Skeeter
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Organization: UTB
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 14:15 UTC
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us1.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=^\`J_k4jIe6bm`LXY\IR50HWonT5<]0T=djI?Uho:Xe;=aHS]UU?AT?oPD:4AD`_[9M71k8;6laY:UUB=;VWj<o5f0>k00;aQj74oYC1[ECcN7
X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net
From: skeeterweed@photonmail.com (Skeeter)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Thousands of sex-change surgeries performed on minors in 5-year period
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:15:17 -0600
References: <bu6ggjduq6l5rl9ses3aqml2mfhobagnnb@4ax.com> <JpYQO.243587$1m96.51316@fx15.iad> <67145de2$0$212405$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6714658e$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <67147f6a$2$2760$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <671522f3$2$212415$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <vf3a4c$fv09$2@dont-email.me> <vf3sbi$iukn$1@dont-email.me> <6715892e$0$2873005$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <vf4al1$l15m$6@dont-email.me> <vf5e9i$jsii$1@dont-email.me> <67164daa$0$2753$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <vf6f48$ufke$1@dont-email.me> <6716eab2$1$2385533$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <vf6vgd$15slb$1@dont-email.me> <6717194e$0$1428140$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <vf83ld$1f1j7$1@dont-email.me>
Organization: UTB
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
X-Face: AP|6$b4whrFkmU[,<)s@Z;ehlVT}*5l)r6gN\thpAvJ*W!8(%]+b8=VPtV!{TM\a]A{R$S"
GSGOV.&f*Yn3[(~bmgPw1o@\LC1jprxj;/C65iiF0:UH14!>qn]+g!\svSS>[&={@7\vG_@uL_%}W_
<:ut-;.NLzbsU|G.S>MKj
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 241022-2, 10/22/2024), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 523
Message-ID: <6717b338$0$3234619$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1729606456 reader.netnews.com 3234619 127.0.0.1:39973
View all headers

In article <vf83ld$1f1j7$1@dont-email.me>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>
> On 10/21/24 11:18 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vf6vgd$15slb$1@dont-email.me>,
> > recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>
> >> On 10/21/24 7:58 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vf6f48$ufke$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10/21/24 8:49 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vf5e9i$jsii$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
> >>>>> says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 10/20/24 9:26 PM, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 2024-10-20, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In article <vf3sbi$iukn$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
> >>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 10/20/24 12:11 PM, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-20, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <67147f6a$2$2760$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 7:06:32 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <6714658e$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <67145de2$0$212405$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:46:33 PM MST, "marika" wrote
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <JpYQO.243587$1m96.51316@fx15.iad>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 16, 2024 at 1:35:02 PM MST, "-hh" wrote <vep81m$28g54$1@dont-email.me>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/24 8:05 PM, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-15, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/24 5:54 PM, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-15, citizen winston smith <sss@example.de> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/2024 1:36 PM, -hh wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're now trying to claim that the "what has changed?" is that there's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adults now seeking to have genetically normal kids undergo sex change
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were you "in the navy" Huntzy?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cuz you are as gay as a swabbie with no shore leave.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll bet hh volunteered to take other sailors "night in the barrel", if you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get my drift.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pun intended.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, we certainly do: you know that you're mad because you can't dispute
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> facts on the topic, so you try to "Shoot the Messenger" instead. Lame.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mad?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hardly.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I stopped getting mad when I was about 12 yo.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's a waste of energy.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So if you're denying that it is due to anger, then what *was* your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> motivation to sling such a lame Ad Hominem? After all, you did choose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to post, so there must have been a reason. So if its not you being
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upset & butthurt again, then just what was your motivation?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> He seems unaware of his own emotional states... unless you have a signifiant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue pretty much all people experience anger from time to time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to look up from my spreadsheet and observe what the world is is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saying.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's something you seem unable to do.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the contrary: I find that worldviews are expanded by using objective
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data, and helps to reveal my own potential personal biases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where Pothead makes things up, such as his recent claims that I am somehow
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsible for Carroll's flood bot.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can spin your numbers all day and night but the fact remains that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the number 1 issue with voters is the economy/inflation and the polls
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show that people blame Biden/Harris for the mess.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that is a fact.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And people are _never_ deceived? Or make a mountain out of a mole hill?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Case in point:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Initially Biden was trying to convince the people that Bidenomics was working.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So then, just what is the definition of "working" here?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if it is real wage increasing to catch up with inflation, we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know that it is already 98% of the way there by one metric, and is 102%
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the way there by another metric.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still struggling based on Reagan and his absurd trickle down. Trump's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work to redistribute money to the very rich did not help. Nor did the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pandemic. Nor the war in Ukraine.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ironically, the Russians think this has been a very bad year for them also.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They are going through some things.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The war they started is not going well for them. Turns out just tossing more
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> people to die at a war is not always a winning strategy.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Amongst other nonfun things, the Russians have bombing their own people in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> territories like Bilhorod.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For the past year.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The world should be harsher toward their aggression. Trump clearly would not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be if he wins.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Cite?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> No wars when he was in office.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In April 2017, Trump ordered missile strikes on a Syrian airbase
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Not a war.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Additionally, Trump warned the Syrians not to use poison gas on their own citizens.
> >>>>>>>>>> They tested Trump and he delivered on his promise.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> That's the difference between Trump and Biden.
> >>>>>>>>>> Our ships are being fired upon in the Middle East and Biden does virtually nothing other than continue his weak policy of appeasement.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Trump ramped up military operations in Afghanistan.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> To end a war.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Yes.
> >>>>>>>>>> And Biden/Harris managed to botch that one as well.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> But since you pendants are using the "not a war" bit because Congress
> >>>>>>>>> never declared one, nothing about Afghanistan counts for Biden either.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 13 dead soldiers.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1/5th as many casualties as Trump had during his tenure.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So that makes it ok? You idiot.
> >>>>
> >>>> Nope.
> >>>
> >>> Then shut up about it.
> >>
> >> I'm not the one who's been harping on those 13 casualties.
> >
> > Because you don't care.

<crickets>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>> BUTWHATABOUT
> >>>>
> >>>> Because I'm showing how you're so selectively pearl-clutching.
> >>>
> >>> I bet you wish you even knew what that meant.
> >>
> >> It means you're hamming it up as a drama queen.
> >
> > Is that what it means? What shithole do you live in?

<crickets>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>> And it happened while upholding what Trump had obligated the USA to do
> >>>>>> under the February 2020 Doha Accord.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bullshit Joe fucked up. Even the "generals" said so.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Why the scare quotes around "generals"? Are these some of Trump's very
> >>>> fake "But Sir!" (he said with a tear in his eye), or do you have actual
> >>>> citations with names, dates, and quotes?
> >>>>
> >>>> Plus when did these leaders first oppose? Back at the Doha Accord?
> >>>> Because Doha was when the final ball was committed & put in motion.
> >>>
> >>> I wasn't there.
> >>
> >> Oh, so you now can't actually produce any of these "generals". Check!
> >
> > Well they don't live here.
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>> Yep.
> >>>>>>> This hh assclown is a massive idiot.
> >>>>>>> Congress never declared war during Vietnam.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nor did Congress declare war for Korea. Yet you keep on trying to use
> >>>>>> "not a war" pedantry to overlook Trump's military engagements.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What wars did he start?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> What wars did Biden start?
> >>>
> >>> I never said he started any.
> >>
> >>
> >> Then why did you ask what wars Trump started?
> >
> > It's called a question dummy.
> >
> >> Hypocritical double-standard much?
> >
> > No, a question.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>>>> Which includes 65 soldiers who died in Afghanistan during Trump.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Not a war.
> >>>>
> >>>> Then by your own standard, Biden's 13 losses during the final evacuation
> >>>> don't count either.
> >>>
> >>> They are dead because of his fuck up. I know you don't care. Like
> >>> Hillary said about the troops that died at Benghazi. "at this point what
> >>> difference does it make?"
> >>
> >> On the contrary: while you've been alluding to them being suckers and
> >> losers (TM), I've cared enough to put their sacrifice into mission
> >> context of how many civilians were successfully rescued. Don't you
> >> remember how I've posted a challenge to all comers to go identify any
> >> equivalent military evacuation under fire to have had a better
> >> (casualty:rescue) ratio? Or is this another case of your selective
> >> senility again?
> >
> > What a load. People died because Joe fucked up.
>
> If you think its BS, stop dodging and just simply prove me wrong.
>
> Show us what other military evacuation under fire had a better ratio of
> rescues vs losses: Afghanistan had 122,000 rescued for 13 losses, which
> is a ratio of 9,385 saved for each loss. List all of those operations
> which have been so vastly better executed that this one was a 'fuck up'.

Joe fucked up. This is settled.
>
> FYI, from the COLA archives:
>
> "...if one wants to callously compare the two in terms of the
> ratio of successfully evacuated -vs- US lives lost, there were 4 deaths
> in the Saigon airlift to save 7,000 people, so Vietnam's metric was
> 1750:1. In contrast, Afghanistan was 13 for 122,000 which is 9400:1 ...
> 5x better."

No one cares.
>
>
> <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/gqTggM-UC_M/m/4Y9ynM54GQAJ>
>
> Yeah, this challenge has been out there for losers to try to debunk
> since September 1, 2021 ... and not one blathermouth has succeeded.

Joe fucked up.
>
>
> >>>>>>> What do they call it?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> These libbys are fools.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As opposed to you two being hypocrite.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No wars caused by Trump.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So? What wars did Biden cause? Also zero, right?
> >>>
> >>> I never said he did. But he sure allowed them to happen.
> >>
> >> Yes, Trump did certainly permit a lot of bad shit, including the ongoing
> >> Mideast mess which centers around Iran's surrogates, which is on Trump
> >> for pulling out of that nuclear deal.
> >
> >
> > BUTWHATABOUT TRUMP!
>
> "No wars caused by Trump" <-- you started these comparisons.

None.
>
>
> >>>>>> For you're also being deliberately blind to how Trump failed to deliver
> >>>>>> on his campaign promise to exit Afghanistan.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Joe fucked that up.
> >>>>
> >>>> How could Biden have "fucked up" Trump's campaign promise to be out of
> >>>> Afghanistan by the end of Trump's term? Be specific.
> >>>
> >>> Why did Biden spend his first day signing off all Trumps EOs? He could
> >>> have changed that too.
> >>
> >> Why did Trump spend his first weeks signing off on EOs that undid
> >> Obama's works? FYI, one of these eliminated an SEC based fiduciary
> >> responsibility on your Investment Broker when he gives you advice.
> >> This could be why you've been whining about not being as well off today.
> >
> >
> > and he runs from the question and a BUTWHATABOUT
> "No wars caused by Trump" <-- you started these comparisons.

None.
>
> Plus we know that Trump cancelled a bunch of Obama's stuff, so you've
> failed to show how Biden was in any way meaningfully different.

Why didn't he change the withdrawal then?
>
> >>>> Also note that Trump had issued orders to the Pentagon to be out by
> >>>> December 2020, but then rescinded that order. Why didn't he keep his
> >>>> campaign promise? Perhaps because he thinks his legacy would have been
> >>>> one of someone who "runs away"? Or because since there hadn't been
> >>>> adequate planning done, military losses then would've been even worse?
> >>>
> >>> Cry a river. What does that have to do with now?
> >>
> >> It illustrates how Trump could have met his campaign promise but
> >> chickened out. Trump is terrified to be ever be seen as weak, which is
> >> why he's easily manipulated by that personality flaw.
> >
> >
> > He is speaking somewhere everyday. Twice today. Sorry but you have
> > nothing.
>
>
> His speech: "You want fries with that?" /s
>
You ignore the fact that he is somewhere everyday drawing crowds. Why do
you ignore that?
>
>
> >>>>>> And blind to how there were thousands of Trump-freed Taliban military
> >>>>>> which contributed to the very deaths you're claiming to be so upset about.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But allowing crooks to cross the border and rape and kill is ok?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Oh, look: its yet another attempt to run & change the subject!
> >>>
> >>> Nope, you just want to avoid it.
> >>
> >> Except for how I then confronted it head on, still quoted below:
> >>
> >>
> >>>> Fun fact:
> >>>> most crooks smuggling fentanyl across the border are US citizens.
> >>>
> >>> Yea right.
> >>>>
> >>>> Need cite? Here ya go, luzer:
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://www.cato.org/blog/fentanyl-smuggled-us-citizens-us-citizens-not-asylum-seekers>
> >>>
> >>> and? I'm supposed to believe that? Besides no matter what color they are
> >>> they are still crossing illegally.
> >>
> >>
> >> Of course *you* don't believe anything that goes against your beliefs.
> >> But facts don't give a damn if your feelings get hurt, snowflake.
> >
> > I'm not a liberal you non original halfwit.
>
> Yet you've still been triggered: that's what makes you a snowflake.

Laughing at your bull isn't triggered. Stop lying.
>
>
> >>>> Much of our border dilemma is due to decades of systemic under-funding
> >>>> of the Judicial department who's responsible to process refugee claims,
> >>>> primarily since the Refugee Act of 1980 (Public Law 96-212), which
> >>>> amended the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Bull shit. Follow the fucking law.
> >>
> >> This *is* following the law. Get a clue.
> >
> > I explained. You choose to ignore.
>
> LOL, your "explanation" was merely a partisan claim.

Translation: You're right so will post this crap in response.
>
> I "ignored" it by showing you that the arrest data shows that the
> fentanyl smuggling problem at the US-Mexico border is being primarily
> perpetrated by US Citizens.
>

It's bullshit. Deal with it.
> Likewise,
>
>
>
> >>> Cross at legal crossing points and
> >>> get vetted. If you try to cross anywhere else you are breaking the law
> >>> and go to jail or get sent back. That worked for a long time.
> >>>
> >>>> Need cite? <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugee_Act>
> >>>>
> >>>> This systemic under-funding has resulted in a years-long case backlog,
> >>>> and even though the Judicial approval rate of refugee cases is under 5%,
> >>>> they're legally allowed to reside in the USA until their case is heard.
> >>>>
> >>>> Perhaps the reason why this situation has been allowed to continue is
> >>>> because its good for business: they can hire those peoples cheaply
> >>>> (they're 7.65% cheaper than US Citizens at the same hourly rate), plus
> >>>> most (~95%) of the time, the businesses know that they don't really have
> >>>> to worry about having to provide raises or pay longer term benefits.
> >>
> >>
> >> ...and of course Skeeter can't bring himself up to comment on the plain
> >> truths mentioned above, particularly in light of how he knows that Trump
> >> directed Johnson to kill the immigration reform bill earlier this year.
> >
> >
> > It was a bill full of pork. Stupid spending.
>
> Pork? List them.

More money going to other countries is not a border bill.
>
> From a fiscal standpoint, "stupid spending" was forgiving fraudulent
> PPP loans in Oct 2020, instead of prosecuting those criminals.
>
> Likewise, the 2017 TCJA added $2T to the national deficit, and because
> actual revenues are still lower than the original 2017 CBO baseline
> ($28,490B vs $29,170B) it not only didn't deliver its "trickle down"
> promises, but actually harmed the US economy. Data's from here:
>
> <https://taxfoundation.org/blog/2017-tax-law-revenue/>
>
> Of course, none of this diversion attempt from Skeeter touches the main
> point made, which is that many of the immigrants aren't illegal in the
> first place, but are in limbo for 3-5 years awaiting their court date,
> and during that wait, US businesses exploit them as a cheap labor pool.

I am talking about the ones who enter other than a legal entry point.
Remember that numbskull?
>
>
>
>
> >>>>>> But yeah sure, the next time you see a Vet, you'll say your performative
> >>>>>> "Thank you for your service" to make you - not them - feel better:
> >>>>>> Active Duty knows that it is bullshit, because you don't really support
> >>>>>> the troops, as evidenced by your support of political candidates who
> >>>>>> stole DoD housing funds to build a wall, and who try to strip services &
> >>>>>> funding from the VA.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You never served so shut the fuck up.
> >>>>
> >>>> Unlike you, I've sworn the Oath to uphold & defend the US Constitution.
> >>>> I know that that Oath is a lifetime commitment and live so accordingly.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yea whatever.
> >>
> >> Gosh, what a gracious apology that was from you.
> >
> > It was more like a middle finger. I dont believe you.
>
> Oh, we all know that you're just trying to be rude...and failing even at
> that: you're simply reinforcing what we already knew, which is that
> your "thank you for your service" is performative bullshit, as you turn
> on anyone who you just worshiped if they say things you don't like.

TINW
>
>
> >> Now you might be starting to have a clue as to why Active Duty turned
> >> away from supporting the GOP back in 2020, and there's not a chance in
> >> hell that they're going to go back now in 2024. Case in point:
> >>
> >> "Trump?s popularity slips in latest Military Times poll ? and more
> >> troops say they?ll vote for Biden"
> >> - 31 AUG 2020
> >>
> >> cite:
> >> <https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2020/08/31/as-trumps-popularity-slips-in-latest-military-times-poll-more-troops-say-theyll-vote-for-biden/>
> >>
> >> FYI, the poll they also listed showed Biden +3.9 points over Trump.
> >
> > All something that means nothing.
>
> It shows that the GOP has lost support from their traditional military
> members base. And your deflection attempt illustrates your desperation.

Nope. They support him liar.
>
>
> > So why were they booing her at he rally?
>
> Gosh, what another vague allusion without any substantiation.
> How convenient for you!

I watched it idiot. They were booing her.
>
>
> -hh

SubjectRepliesAuthor
o Thousands of sex-change surgeries performed on minors in 5-year period

By: John Smyth on Thu, 10 Oct 2024

386John Smyth

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor