Rocksolid Light

News from da outaworlds

mail  files  register  groups  login

Message-ID:  

It usually takes more than three weeks to prepare a good impromptu speech. -- Mark Twain


comp / comp.os.linux.advocacy / Re: Thousands of sex-change surgeries performed on minors in 5-year period

Subject: Re: Thousands of sex-change surgeries performed on minors in 5-year period
From: Skeeter
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Organization: UTB
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 03:18 UTC
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!s1-3.netnews.com!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us1.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=7:IIXeQXEOS3nP4W`aO0a[HWonT5<]0T]djI?Uho:Xe[=aHS]UU?AT_oPD:4AD`_[YM71k8;6laYZUUB=;VWj<oUf0>k00;aQjW4oYC1[ECcNW
X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net
From: skeeterweed@photonmail.com (Skeeter)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Thousands of sex-change surgeries performed on minors in 5-year period
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:18:36 -0600
References: <bu6ggjduq6l5rl9ses3aqml2mfhobagnnb@4ax.com> <JpYQO.243587$1m96.51316@fx15.iad> <67145de2$0$212405$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6714658e$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <67147f6a$2$2760$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <671522f3$2$212415$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <vf3a4c$fv09$2@dont-email.me> <vf3sbi$iukn$1@dont-email.me> <6715892e$0$2873005$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <vf4al1$l15m$6@dont-email.me> <vf5e9i$jsii$1@dont-email.me> <67164daa$0$2753$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <vf6f48$ufke$1@dont-email.me> <6716eab2$1$2385533$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <vf6vgd$15slb$1@dont-email.me>
Organization: UTB
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
X-Face: AP|6$b4whrFkmU[,<)s@Z;ehlVT}*5l)r6gN\thpAvJ*W!8(%]+b8=VPtV!{TM\a]A{R$S" GSGOV.&f*Yn3[(~bmgPw1o@\LC1jprxj;/C65iiF0:UH14!>qn]+g!\svSS>[&={@7\vG_@uL_%}W_ <:ut-;.NLzbsU|G.S>MKj
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 241021-4, 10/21/2024), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 411
Message-ID: <6717194e$0$1428140$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1729567054 reader.netnews.com 1428140 127.0.0.1:50539
X-Received-Bytes: 17661
View all headers

In article <vf6vgd$15slb$1@dont-email.me>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>
> On 10/21/24 7:58 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vf6f48$ufke$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 10/21/24 8:49 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vf5e9i$jsii$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10/20/24 9:26 PM, pothead wrote:
> >>>>> On 2024-10-20, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> In article <vf3sbi$iukn$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
> >>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 10/20/24 12:11 PM, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 2024-10-20, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <67147f6a$2$2760$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 7:06:32 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> >>>>>>>>>> <6714658e$0$1787$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <67145de2$0$212405$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:46:33 PM MST, "marika" wrote
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <JpYQO.243587$1m96.51316@fx15.iad>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 16, 2024 at 1:35:02 PM MST, "-hh" wrote <vep81m$28g54$1@dont-email.me>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/24 8:05 PM, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-15, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/24 5:54 PM, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-15, citizen winston smith <sss@example.de> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/15/2024 1:36 PM, -hh wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're now trying to claim that the "what has changed?" is that there's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adults now seeking to have genetically normal kids undergo sex change
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> operations.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Were you "in the navy" Huntzy?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/nmGuy0jievs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cuz you are as gay as a swabbie with no shore leave.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll bet hh volunteered to take other sailors "night in the barrel", if you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get my drift.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pun intended.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh, we certainly do: you know that you're mad because you can't dispute
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> facts on the topic, so you try to "Shoot the Messenger" instead. Lame.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mad?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hardly.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I stopped getting mad when I was about 12 yo.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's a waste of energy.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So if you're denying that it is due to anger, then what *was* your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> motivation to sling such a lame Ad Hominem? After all, you did choose
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to post, so there must have been a reason. So if its not you being
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> upset & butthurt again, then just what was your motivation?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> He seems unaware of his own emotional states... unless you have a signifiant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> issue pretty much all people experience anger from time to time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to look up from my spreadsheet and observe what the world is is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saying.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's something you seem unable to do.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On the contrary: I find that worldviews are expanded by using objective
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> data, and helps to reveal my own potential personal biases.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Where Pothead makes things up, such as his recent claims that I am somehow
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> responsible for Carroll's flood bot.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can spin your numbers all day and night but the fact remains that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the number 1 issue with voters is the economy/inflation and the polls
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> show that people blame Biden/Harris for the mess.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And that is a fact.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And people are _never_ deceived? Or make a mountain out of a mole hill?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Case in point:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Initially Biden was trying to convince the people that Bidenomics was working.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So then, just what is the definition of "working" here?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because if it is real wage increasing to catch up with inflation, we
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> know that it is already 98% of the way there by one metric, and is 102%
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the way there by another metric.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We are still struggling based on Reagan and his absurd trickle down. Trump's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> work to redistribute money to the very rich did not help. Nor did the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pandemic. Nor the war in Ukraine.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Ironically, the Russians think this has been a very bad year for them also.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> They are going through some things.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The war they started is not going well for them. Turns out just tossing more
> >>>>>>>>>>>> people to die at a war is not always a winning strategy.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Amongst other nonfun things, the Russians have bombing their own people in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> territories like Bilhorod.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> For the past year.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The world should be harsher toward their aggression. Trump clearly would not
> >>>>>>>>>>>> be if he wins.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Bullshit.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Cite?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> No wars when he was in office.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> In April 2017, Trump ordered missile strikes on a Syrian airbase
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Not a war.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Additionally, Trump warned the Syrians not to use poison gas on their own citizens.
> >>>>>>>> They tested Trump and he delivered on his promise.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> That's the difference between Trump and Biden.
> >>>>>>>> Our ships are being fired upon in the Middle East and Biden does virtually nothing other than continue his weak policy of appeasement.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Trump ramped up military operations in Afghanistan.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> To end a war.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yes.
> >>>>>>>> And Biden/Harris managed to botch that one as well.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> But since you pendants are using the "not a war" bit because Congress
> >>>>>>> never declared one, nothing about Afghanistan counts for Biden either.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 13 dead soldiers.
> >>>>
> >>>> 1/5th as many casualties as Trump had during his tenure.
> >>>
> >>> So that makes it ok? You idiot.
> >>
> >> Nope.
> >
> > Then shut up about it.
>
> I'm not the one who's been harping on those 13 casualties.

Because you don't care.
>
>
> >>> BUTWHATABOUT
> >>
> >> Because I'm showing how you're so selectively pearl-clutching.
> >
> > I bet you wish you even knew what that meant.
>
> It means you're hamming it up as a drama queen.

Is that what it means? What shithole do you live in?
>
>
> >>>> And it happened while upholding what Trump had obligated the USA to do
> >>>> under the February 2020 Doha Accord.
> >>>
> >>> Bullshit Joe fucked up. Even the "generals" said so.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Why the scare quotes around "generals"? Are these some of Trump's very
> >> fake "But Sir!" (he said with a tear in his eye), or do you have actual
> >> citations with names, dates, and quotes?
> >>
> >> Plus when did these leaders first oppose? Back at the Doha Accord?
> >> Because Doha was when the final ball was committed & put in motion.
> >
> > I wasn't there.
>
> Oh, so you now can't actually produce any of these "generals". Check!

Well they don't live here.
>
>
> >>>>> Yep.
> >>>>> This hh assclown is a massive idiot.
> >>>>> Congress never declared war during Vietnam.
> >>>>
> >>>> Nor did Congress declare war for Korea. Yet you keep on trying to use
> >>>> "not a war" pedantry to overlook Trump's military engagements.
> >>>
> >>> What wars did he start?
> >>
> >>
> >> What wars did Biden start?
> >
> > I never said he started any.
>
>
> Then why did you ask what wars Trump started?

It's called a question dummy.

> Hypocritical double-standard much?

No, a question.
>
>
>
> >>>> Which includes 65 soldiers who died in Afghanistan during Trump.
> >>>
> >>> Not a war.
> >>
> >> Then by your own standard, Biden's 13 losses during the final evacuation
> >> don't count either.
> >
> > They are dead because of his fuck up. I know you don't care. Like
> > Hillary said about the troops that died at Benghazi. "at this point what
> > difference does it make?"
>
> On the contrary: while you've been alluding to them being suckers and
> losers (TM), I've cared enough to put their sacrifice into mission
> context of how many civilians were successfully rescued. Don't you
> remember how I've posted a challenge to all comers to go identify any
> equivalent military evacuation under fire to have had a better
> (casualty:rescue) ratio? Or is this another case of your selective
> senility again?

What a load. People died because Joe fucked up.
>
>
>
> >>>>> What do they call it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> These libbys are fools.
> >>>>
> >>>> As opposed to you two being hypocrite.
> >>>
> >>> No wars caused by Trump.
> >>
> >>
> >> So? What wars did Biden cause? Also zero, right?
> >
> > I never said he did. But he sure allowed them to happen.
>
> Yes, Trump did certainly permit a lot of bad shit, including the ongoing
> Mideast mess which centers around Iran's surrogates, which is on Trump
> for pulling out of that nuclear deal.

BUTWHATABOUT TRUMP!
>
>
> >>>> For you're also being deliberately blind to how Trump failed to deliver
> >>>> on his campaign promise to exit Afghanistan.
> >>>
> >>> Joe fucked that up.
> >>
> >> How could Biden have "fucked up" Trump's campaign promise to be out of
> >> Afghanistan by the end of Trump's term? Be specific.
> >
> > Why did Biden spend his first day signing off all Trumps EOs? He could
> > have changed that too.
>
> Why did Trump spend his first weeks signing off on EOs that undid
> Obama's works? FYI, one of these eliminated an SEC based fiduciary
> responsibility on your Investment Broker when he gives you advice.
> This could be why you've been whining about not being as well off today.

and he runs from the question and a BUTWHATABOUT
>
>
> >> Also note that Trump had issued orders to the Pentagon to be out by
> >> December 2020, but then rescinded that order. Why didn't he keep his
> >> campaign promise? Perhaps because he thinks his legacy would have been
> >> one of someone who "runs away"? Or because since there hadn't been
> >> adequate planning done, military losses then would've been even worse?
> >
> > Cry a river. What does that have to do with now?
>
> It illustrates how Trump could have met his campaign promise but
> chickened out. Trump is terrified to be ever be seen as weak, which is
> why he's easily manipulated by that personality flaw.

He is speaking somewhere everyday. Twice today. Sorry but you have
nothing.
>
>
> >>>> And blind to how there were thousands of Trump-freed Taliban military
> >>>> which contributed to the very deaths you're claiming to be so upset about.
> >>>
> >>> But allowing crooks to cross the border and rape and kill is ok?
> >>
> >>
> >> Oh, look: its yet another attempt to run & change the subject!
> >
> > Nope, you just want to avoid it.
>
> Except for how I then confronted it head on, still quoted below:
>
>
> >> Fun fact:
> >> most crooks smuggling fentanyl across the border are US citizens.
> >
> > Yea right.
> >>
> >> Need cite? Here ya go, luzer:
> >>
> >> <https://www.cato.org/blog/fentanyl-smuggled-us-citizens-us-citizens-not-asylum-seekers>
> >
> > and? I'm supposed to believe that? Besides no matter what color they are
> > they are still crossing illegally.
>
>
> Of course *you* don't believe anything that goes against your beliefs.
> But facts don't give a damn if your feelings get hurt, snowflake.

I'm not a liberal you non original halfwit.
>
>
> >> Much of our border dilemma is due to decades of systemic under-funding
> >> of the Judicial department who's responsible to process refugee claims,
> >> primarily since the Refugee Act of 1980 (Public Law 96-212), which
> >> amended the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
> >>
> >
> > Bull shit. Follow the fucking law.
>
> This *is* following the law. Get a clue.

I explained. You choose to ignore.
>
>
> > Cross at legal crossing points and
> > get vetted. If you try to cross anywhere else you are breaking the law
> > and go to jail or get sent back. That worked for a long time.
> >
> >> Need cite? <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refugee_Act>
> >>
> >> This systemic under-funding has resulted in a years-long case backlog,
> >> and even though the Judicial approval rate of refugee cases is under 5%,
> >> they're legally allowed to reside in the USA until their case is heard.
> >>
> >> Perhaps the reason why this situation has been allowed to continue is
> >> because its good for business: they can hire those peoples cheaply
> >> (they're 7.65% cheaper than US Citizens at the same hourly rate), plus
> >> most (~95%) of the time, the businesses know that they don't really have
> >> to worry about having to provide raises or pay longer term benefits.
>
>
> ...and of course Skeeter can't bring himself up to comment on the plain
> truths mentioned above, particularly in light of how he knows that Trump
> directed Johnson to kill the immigration reform bill earlier this year.

It was a bill full of pork. Stupid spending.
>
> >>>> But yeah sure, the next time you see a Vet, you'll say your performative
> >>>> "Thank you for your service" to make you - not them - feel better:
> >>>> Active Duty knows that it is bullshit, because you don't really support
> >>>> the troops, as evidenced by your support of political candidates who
> >>>> stole DoD housing funds to build a wall, and who try to strip services &
> >>>> funding from the VA.
> >>>
> >>> You never served so shut the fuck up.
> >>
> >> Unlike you, I've sworn the Oath to uphold & defend the US Constitution.
> >> I know that that Oath is a lifetime commitment and live so accordingly.
> >
> >
> > Yea whatever.
>
> Gosh, what a gracious apology that was from you.

It was more like a middle finger. I dont believe you.
>
> Now you might be starting to have a clue as to why Active Duty turned
> away from supporting the GOP back in 2020, and there's not a chance in
> hell that they're going to go back now in 2024. Case in point:
>
> "Trump?s popularity slips in latest Military Times poll ? and more
> troops say they?ll vote for Biden"
> - 31 AUG 2020
>
> cite:
> <https://www.militarytimes.com/news/pentagon-congress/2020/08/31/as-trumps-popularity-slips-in-latest-military-times-poll-more-troops-say-theyll-vote-for-biden/>
>
> FYI, the poll they also listed showed Biden +3.9 points over Trump.

All something that means nothing.

So why were they booing her at he rally?
>
>
> -hh

SubjectRepliesAuthor
o Thousands of sex-change surgeries performed on minors in 5-year period

By: John Smyth on Thu, 10 Oct 2024

386John Smyth

rocksolid light 0.9.8
clearnet tor