On 2024-10-02 9:01 a.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-10-01, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-10-01 3:29 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-30 3:03 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So that's answer. "1984" style censorship with its "thought police." This is
>>>>> the goal of the Democrats, to completely control information and give us
>>>>> only their side of the story. It's the Woke Cult. They already have this
>>>>> control in the MSM, but "too much" truth "leaks out" on the Internet. They
>>>>> want to shut that down and completely control the Internet as well.
>>>>
>>>> Since they have total control of the platforms where people can share
>>>> the truth, including Telegram now, it is very important to hold onto
>>>> ones where people can speak freely like Usenet or Gab. If we didn't have
>>>> such platforms, we'd all have to repeat MSNBC talking points all day
>>>> like Ahlstrom does if we wanted to hold onto our accounts or stay off
>>>> the radar of the police. What's happening in England, with people
>>>> getting a visit from the police or getting arrested for speaking out
>>>> about an injustice is what's coming to America if people actually allow
>>>> people like John Kerry to get what they want in crippling the First
>>>> Amendment. We're already fucked in Canada.
>>>
>>> I can't argue with any of this. This is what they want. Complete control of
>>> thought. On September 22 (quietly) many countries in the U.N. signed on to a
>>> "A Pact for the Future" — coordinated through the U.N. But it won't mean
>>> much if Rothschild's minions (the U.S. and Britain and the EU) can't stop
>>> Russia, China and BRICS.
>>>
>>> https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/ltd/n24/252/89/pdf/n2425289.pdf
>>>
>>> Skip the bullshit justification for this and go to the planned actions
>>> (pages 55 and 56).
>>
>> Yeah, I saw it. It only highlights how the the United Nations is working
>> against the West. Luckily, they have no army and can't force any of
>> their decisions on anyone unless politicians agree with them.
>> Unfortunately, in Canada's case at least, our leadership has no backbone
>> whatsoever and believes such ideas are what's best.
>>
>>> ACTIONS
>>>
>>> Acknowledging the primary role and responsibility of governments at all
>>> levels, in line with their respective constitutional frameworks, towards
>>> safeguarding the needs and interests of future generations, we will
>>> implement, institutionalize and monitor the above commitments in
>>> national, regional and global policymaking by:
>>>
>>> 24. Leveraging science, data, statistics and strategic foresight to
>>> ensure long-term thinking and planning, and to develop and implement
>>> sustainable practices and the institutional reforms necessary to ensure
>>> evidence-based decision-making, while making governance more
>>> anticipatory, adaptive and responsive to future opportunities, risks and
>>> challenges.
>>>
>>> 25. Ensuring inclusive and equitable access to knowledge, science and
>>> information, while promoting innovation, critical thinking and life
>>> skills to create generations of citizens that are agents of positive
>>> change and transformation.
>>>
>>> 26. Strengthening our systems of national and global accounting,
>>> including by promoting the use of forward-looking, evidence-based impact
>>> assessments, developing stronger anticipatory risk analyses and
>>> encouraging the use of measures of progress on sustainable development
>>> that complement and go beyond gross domestic product.
>>>
>>> 27. Investing in capacity to better prepare for and respond to future
>>> global shocks, crises and challenges, and using evidence-based planning
>>> and foresight to avoid and mitigate risks, while ensuring that the
>>> poorest and most vulnerable do not bear disproportionate costs and
>>> burdens of mitigation, adaptation, restoration and resilience-building.
>>>
>>> 28. Undertaking a whole-of-government approach to coordination, including
>>> at the national and local levels, on the assessment, development,
>>> implementation and evaluation of policies that safeguard the needs and
>>> interests of future generations.
>>>
>>> 29. Enhancing cooperation with stakeholders, including civil society,
>>> academia, the scientific and technological community and the private
>>> sector, and encouraging intergenerational partnerships, by promoting a
>>> whole-of-society approach, to share best practices and develop
>>> innovative, long-term and forward-thinking ideas in order to safeguard
>>> the needs and interests of future generations.
>>>
>>> 30. Equipping the multilateral system, including the United Nations, to
>>> support States, upon their request, in their efforts to implement this
>>> Declaration and embed the needs and interests of future generations and
>>> long-term thinking in policymaking processes by fostering cooperation and
>>> facilitating greater use of anticipatory planning and foresight, based on
>>> science, data and statistics, and raising awareness of and advising on
>>> the likely intergenerational or future impacts of policies and
>>> programmes.
>>>
>>> 31. Fostering an organizational culture that is future-oriented and
>>> mainstreamed across the United Nations system in order to facilitate
>>> science -- and evidence-based decision-making by developing diverse
>>> capabilities, including anticipatory planning, foresight and futures
>>> literacy, and systematically promoting long-term and intergenerational
>>> thinking at all levels.
>>>
>>> 32. Recognizing the important advisory and advocacy role that the United
>>> Nations should play with respect to future generations, we:
>>>
>>> (a) Take note of the Secretary-General’s proposal to appoint a Special
>>> Envoy for Future Generations to support the implementation of this
>>> Declaration;
>>>
>>> (b) Decide to convene an inclusive high-level plenary meeting of the
>>> General Assembly on future generations that will review the
>>> implementation of this Declaration during the eighty-third session of
>>> the General Assembly and provide updates on the actions taken to
>>> safeguard the needs and interests of future generations;
>>>
>>> (c) Request the Secretary-General to present a report on the
>>> implementation of this Declaration for consideration at the high-level
>>> plenary meeting to be held during the eighty-third session of the
>>> General Assembly.
>>>
>>> Now you see why Kamala Harris spews out word salads and repeats words like
>>> "holistic" continually. It's the language of those who are vague in how they
>>> say it — but precise in what they mean. These are code words. Note that
>>> there is not one mention of protecting citizen's freedom of religion or
>>> right to free speech, but there are constant references to "science" and
>>> "evidence-based decision making" (note they continually repeated the
>>> "evidence-based science" for the Covid restrictions — Fauci finally
>>> admitting that masks and the six feet distancing were just arbitrary
>>> bullshit made up on the fly). But the mistakes they made in the past don't
>>> matter to these tyrants.
>>>
>>> Also note the the constant use of "change", "change agents" and
>>> "transformation." In other words brainwashing citizens into the new world
>>> order "group-think", i.e., Woke bullshit.
>>>
>>> All this change will be "implemented, institutionalized and monitored" on a
>>> "regional, national and global scale" by the United Nations. (Or least that
>>> is their nightmare scenario. This is seriously sick crap, completely at odds
>>> with the U.S. Constitution and the rights guaranteed in it.
>>>
>>> Is it any wonder that that piece of shit John Kerry thinks our First
>>> Amendment will get in the way of his worldwide gulag wet dream?
>>
>> If I were an American and had been considering voting for Harris either
>> as a competent leader or as an alternative to Trump, I would sooner just
>> stay home and let others have a voice. In any interview you watch with
>> her, she is either unable to answer a simple question or repeats
>> paragraphs she memorized that have nothing to do with what's being
>> asked. How is anyone supposed to believe that this person might help
>> curb inflation or improve their daily life unless they have a serious
>> shortage of testosterone like Chris Ahlstrom and can't notice the
>> extreme incompetence?
>
> Chris Ahlstrom made it clear how deluded he is when he said he would vote
> for Biden, "even if he was in hospice care." They call it "Trump Derangement
> Syndome." And the sad thing is, despite Trump's clearer message, he's not
> all that much better than Harris. Both take their marching orders from the
> Deep State (i.e., the Rothschilds). We're basically screwed when it comes to
> the so-called "two party" (same party) system in this country. I'm not
> voting for either Trump or Harris, neither one is worth a shit.

I would have been in the same situation. I still enjoy watching the
debates, but I've always enjoyed debates because the exchange of ideas
is going to be interesting regardless. It's almost like a heated
argument between professional wrestlers which is often more interesting
than their eventual match.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king