On 2024-10-01, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2024-10-01 3:29 a.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-30 3:03 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So that's answer. "1984" style censorship with its "thought police." This is
>>>> the goal of the Democrats, to completely control information and give us
>>>> only their side of the story. It's the Woke Cult. They already have this
>>>> control in the MSM, but "too much" truth "leaks out" on the Internet. They
>>>> want to shut that down and completely control the Internet as well.
>>>
>>> Since they have total control of the platforms where people can share
>>> the truth, including Telegram now, it is very important to hold onto
>>> ones where people can speak freely like Usenet or Gab. If we didn't have
>>> such platforms, we'd all have to repeat MSNBC talking points all day
>>> like Ahlstrom does if we wanted to hold onto our accounts or stay off
>>> the radar of the police. What's happening in England, with people
>>> getting a visit from the police or getting arrested for speaking out
>>> about an injustice is what's coming to America if people actually allow
>>> people like John Kerry to get what they want in crippling the First
>>> Amendment. We're already fucked in Canada.
>>
>> I can't argue with any of this. This is what they want. Complete control of
>> thought. On September 22 (quietly) many countries in the U.N. signed on to a
>> "A Pact for the Future" — coordinated through the U.N. But it won't mean
>> much if Rothschild's minions (the U.S. and Britain and the EU) can't stop
>> Russia, China and BRICS.
>>
>> https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/ltd/n24/252/89/pdf/n2425289.pdf
>>
>> Skip the bullshit justification for this and go to the planned actions
>> (pages 55 and 56).
>
> Yeah, I saw it. It only highlights how the the United Nations is working
> against the West. Luckily, they have no army and can't force any of
> their decisions on anyone unless politicians agree with them.
> Unfortunately, in Canada's case at least, our leadership has no backbone
> whatsoever and believes such ideas are what's best.
>
>> ACTIONS
>>
>> Acknowledging the primary role and responsibility of governments at all
>> levels, in line with their respective constitutional frameworks, towards
>> safeguarding the needs and interests of future generations, we will
>> implement, institutionalize and monitor the above commitments in
>> national, regional and global policymaking by:
>>
>> 24. Leveraging science, data, statistics and strategic foresight to
>> ensure long-term thinking and planning, and to develop and implement
>> sustainable practices and the institutional reforms necessary to ensure
>> evidence-based decision-making, while making governance more
>> anticipatory, adaptive and responsive to future opportunities, risks and
>> challenges.
>>
>> 25. Ensuring inclusive and equitable access to knowledge, science and
>> information, while promoting innovation, critical thinking and life
>> skills to create generations of citizens that are agents of positive
>> change and transformation.
>>
>> 26. Strengthening our systems of national and global accounting,
>> including by promoting the use of forward-looking, evidence-based impact
>> assessments, developing stronger anticipatory risk analyses and
>> encouraging the use of measures of progress on sustainable development
>> that complement and go beyond gross domestic product.
>>
>> 27. Investing in capacity to better prepare for and respond to future
>> global shocks, crises and challenges, and using evidence-based planning
>> and foresight to avoid and mitigate risks, while ensuring that the
>> poorest and most vulnerable do not bear disproportionate costs and
>> burdens of mitigation, adaptation, restoration and resilience-building.
>>
>> 28. Undertaking a whole-of-government approach to coordination, including
>> at the national and local levels, on the assessment, development,
>> implementation and evaluation of policies that safeguard the needs and
>> interests of future generations.
>>
>> 29. Enhancing cooperation with stakeholders, including civil society,
>> academia, the scientific and technological community and the private
>> sector, and encouraging intergenerational partnerships, by promoting a
>> whole-of-society approach, to share best practices and develop
>> innovative, long-term and forward-thinking ideas in order to safeguard
>> the needs and interests of future generations.
>>
>> 30. Equipping the multilateral system, including the United Nations, to
>> support States, upon their request, in their efforts to implement this
>> Declaration and embed the needs and interests of future generations and
>> long-term thinking in policymaking processes by fostering cooperation and
>> facilitating greater use of anticipatory planning and foresight, based on
>> science, data and statistics, and raising awareness of and advising on
>> the likely intergenerational or future impacts of policies and
>> programmes.
>>
>> 31. Fostering an organizational culture that is future-oriented and
>> mainstreamed across the United Nations system in order to facilitate
>> science -- and evidence-based decision-making by developing diverse
>> capabilities, including anticipatory planning, foresight and futures
>> literacy, and systematically promoting long-term and intergenerational
>> thinking at all levels.
>>
>> 32. Recognizing the important advisory and advocacy role that the United
>> Nations should play with respect to future generations, we:
>>
>> (a) Take note of the Secretary-General’s proposal to appoint a Special
>> Envoy for Future Generations to support the implementation of this
>> Declaration;
>>
>> (b) Decide to convene an inclusive high-level plenary meeting of the
>> General Assembly on future generations that will review the
>> implementation of this Declaration during the eighty-third session of
>> the General Assembly and provide updates on the actions taken to
>> safeguard the needs and interests of future generations;
>>
>> (c) Request the Secretary-General to present a report on the
>> implementation of this Declaration for consideration at the high-level
>> plenary meeting to be held during the eighty-third session of the
>> General Assembly.
>>
>> Now you see why Kamala Harris spews out word salads and repeats words like
>> "holistic" continually. It's the language of those who are vague in how they
>> say it — but precise in what they mean. These are code words. Note that
>> there is not one mention of protecting citizen's freedom of religion or
>> right to free speech, but there are constant references to "science" and
>> "evidence-based decision making" (note they continually repeated the
>> "evidence-based science" for the Covid restrictions — Fauci finally
>> admitting that masks and the six feet distancing were just arbitrary
>> bullshit made up on the fly). But the mistakes they made in the past don't
>> matter to these tyrants.
>>
>> Also note the the constant use of "change", "change agents" and
>> "transformation." In other words brainwashing citizens into the new world
>> order "group-think", i.e., Woke bullshit.
>>
>> All this change will be "implemented, institutionalized and monitored" on a
>> "regional, national and global scale" by the United Nations. (Or least that
>> is their nightmare scenario. This is seriously sick crap, completely at odds
>> with the U.S. Constitution and the rights guaranteed in it.
>>
>> Is it any wonder that that piece of shit John Kerry thinks our First
>> Amendment will get in the way of his worldwide gulag wet dream?
>
> If I were an American and had been considering voting for Harris either
> as a competent leader or as an alternative to Trump, I would sooner just
> stay home and let others have a voice. In any interview you watch with
> her, she is either unable to answer a simple question or repeats
> paragraphs she memorized that have nothing to do with what's being
> asked. How is anyone supposed to believe that this person might help
> curb inflation or improve their daily life unless they have a serious
> shortage of testosterone like Chris Ahlstrom and can't notice the
> extreme incompetence?

Chris Ahlstrom made it clear how deluded he is when he said he would vote
for Biden, "even if he was in hospice care." They call it "Trump Derangement
Syndome." And the sad thing is, despite Trump's clearer message, he's not
all that much better than Harris. Both take their marching orders from the
Deep State (i.e., the Rothschilds). We're basically screwed when it comes to
the so-called "two party" (same party) system in this country. I'm not
voting for either Trump or Harris, neither one is worth a shit.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien