On 2024-09-13, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
> On 2024-09-13, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> wrote:
>> On 2024-09-12, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> One problem with the debate was that people still do not know what
>>>>>> Kamala's policies are
>>>>>
>>>>> A bigger issue for Trump is people DO know what his polices are.
>>>>
>>>> The issue for the country is too many of the independents, the ones
>>>> who'lhttps://www.teenvogue.com/story/taylor-swift-eras-tour-style-guidel likely decide the
election (were it actually free and fair,
>>>> anyway),
>>>
>>> Right here you show you buy into Trump's lies.
>>
>> So you don't see the media's *INSANE* level of partisanship as being a
>> MASSIVE thumb on the scale?
>>
>> Of course you don't, in this current sham the fact that ABC's coverage
>> of KH was 100% positive and tRUMP's was 93% negative has no effect on
>> your belief that ABC is still a 'news' organization. That's all the
>> proof needed to see the degree to which you're a partisan hack and you
>> have no clue why because you believe 'tRUMP deserves it'.
>
> Snit is a low information, radical left wing person who wants to be taken care of by the
> government, supports anything the left wing MSM tells him. He's a clone of the Biden administration
> which for 4 years has put America last and snit doesn't care as long as it doesn't cost him
> anything and he can continue to live on the dole.
> This is why he needs to pivot, project and snip and run while accusing others of doing exactly what
> he is doing.
> This is classic democrat behavior.
> If the democrats are accusing the republicans of something you can be sure that it's really the
> democrats who are doing that something.
>
> Examples: Russia hoax.. Hillary's brainchild.
> Fake videos.
> Threat to democracy when they install a candidate who hasn't gotten a single POTUS primary vote.
> White supremacy or climate change is the biggest national threat.
> The border is secure
> And many other things.
> This has been a tactic of the democrats for decades.
> To deny that the MSM is mostly biased towards the left is ridiculous.
> The MSM is basically just the publicity department of the DNC.
> They no longer even try to hide it.
>
>> As to what I buy, or not... I don't buy the BS about how 'we checked'
>> and found 'nothing', or, rather, not enough to account for the loss. Any
>> thinking person knows there wasn't nearly enough time/resources put
>> towards a job that big. Here's a comparative clue for you: Look at how
>> much time/$$ was spent on the phony Russian collusion story based on a
>> bogus dossier (that had *already* been debunked by our 'honest and
>> honorable' FBI). Outside of tRUMP, no one 'in power' wanted to find
>> anything... and this doesn't even consider all the cases dismissed for
>> lack of standing (if a POTUS doesn't have standing in a federal
>> election, who does?).
>
> You lost snit at the word "job".
> He has no concept of a legitimate job.
>
>
>> Given how that many states have recently changed their laws (and not in
>> good ways) and how we've embraced mail-in to the extent we have with
>> ballot harvesting and polluted voter rolls, our federal election system
>> is now a joke, a 'third world country level' joke. Couple that with
>> every major influencer in the tank for the Dems and even the most ardent
>> partisan hack, were they honest, would be forced to admit the reality.
>
> It's literally a 24x7 assault on conservative values.
> The goal is to damage Trump and get a democrat elected. They will stop at nothing to accomplish
> this.
>
>
>> It's notable how the Dems scream about having been cheated when they
>> lose... and people like you are fine with it because you're a ridiculous
>> partisan hack who doesn't even realize how readily he displays it.
>
> Like snit they use the flip the script tactic to focus on the minor issue rather than respond to
> the major issue.
>
> So for example, take the Arlington incident.
> The state sponsored media focuses on some minor violation of procedure at the cemetary and ignore
> the fact that Biden/Harris are the reason these people are dead along with the fact that per the
> family member(s), the Biden regime ignored their attempts to reach out to them and finally the fact
> that Trump actually did show up, met with the family members and per their wishes videoed it.
>
> So what is more important?
> The wishes of those who lost loved ones due to the incompetence of the Biden regime.
> Or, some silly regulation which probably gets violated dozens of times a month by people who just
> may not be aware of it.
>
> Guess which one the media has been running with.
>
> See how this works?
>
>
>> Unlike you, I don't buy every goofy piece of propaganda both sides
>> push... but the Dems are *far* worse at this point with all their
>> lopsided lawfare. And they're not just targeting tRUMP, it was RFK,
>> Gabbard and others... and you gobble it all up and ask for more even
>> *as* you recognize we no longer have a democracy. tRUMP is the political
>> version of you, but he's still the better choice.
>
> RFK is a real interesting example of how the democrats slither around.
> At first they tried to get him off the ballot.
> Now they are trying to keep him on the ballot.
> They also blackballed him, Tulsi and Maryanne Williamson who claims that the MSM like MSNBC refuses
> to interview her.
>
> And then there is Nikki Haley, the neocon.
> The democrats poured money into her campaign and had their voters come out in force and vote for
> her during the primaries at least in states where it was permitted to vote across party line.
>
> The democrats are so evil which is why I refer to them as demons.
>
>>>> don't know enough about KH's policies or whether or not to
>>>> believe she'll go against her voting record,
>>
>> (snip stuff at least half the country doesn't believe was based on
>> anything other than lawfare or stuff they clearly don't care about (i.e.
>> mean tweets).
>
> Orange man bad.
> ROTFLMAO.
>
> I'll bet people attempting to pay their mortgage, fill up their car, buy groceries, pay their
> energy bill and so forth would be very happy to get Trump back in office.
> Those mean tweets must be looking quite attractive by now.
>
>
>
>>>> the thing she's currently
>>>> trying to 'sell' to voters after having created a situation she's now
>>>> vowing to 'fix'.
>>>
>>> I bet you believed Trump when he spoke of people eating pets. LOL!
>>
>> What's worse:
>>
>> 1. An apparently, as of yet, unsubstantiated story like that
>>
>> or
>>
>> 2. The telling of lies, which went unchallenged by HK's 'support
>> moderators', that have been debunked *as* lies (one as far back as seven
>> years ago!)
>
> The fix was in (obviously) and it's beginning to come out.
>
><https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/linsey-davis-reveals-how-she-david-muir-abc/>
>
> As for pets being killed here is another one:
>
><https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/horror-multiple-cats-found-killed-mutilated-houston-texas/
>
>
>
>> Notably, you bring up #1 but not #2, gee I wonder why <eyeroll>. KH
>> tried the same crap in the debate to throw tRUMP off and it worked. The
>> problem is people are desensitized to attacks on tRUMP now. She wasted
>> an opportunity to explain herself and polls from independents show it.
>
> It's flip the script again.
>
>
>> Reality check:
>>
>> I have no idea if pet feasting happened, or not... and neither do you.
>> The difference is, I don't just ignore something simply because he said
>> it, that's what TDS did to you. Our own governor stated our issue with
>> the TDA gang isn't happening, that people were imagining it. I'd have to
>> be as stupid as you are to agree with him without doing any research.
>
> Same.
> At worst, Trump said something stupid.
>
> The media is flipping the script to avoid reporting on the damage that ~20k immigrants dumped into
> a small town of ~60k people.
>
> Overloaded social welfare system.
> Jammed hospitals.
> Overloaded education system.
> Accidents all over the place because these illegal migrants don't follow the US laws.
> Crime.
> etc.
>
> Better to talk about some stupid Trump statement.
>
> Again, see how this works?
>
>
>>>> Worse, like you, far too many will be voting on emotion
>>>> or because Taylor Swift (or <fill in the blank> 'did the research' for
>>>> them <eyeroll>.
>>>
>>> YOU are the one who focused on emotion.
>>
>> Said the partisan hack who emphatically agreed with someone over voting
>> based on emotion. What's next? You'll become a 'Swiftie'?
>
> snit probably owns a plaid skater skirt, pumps, boots and all the rest.
> He already has the hair and the lispy voice.
>
> And if not, this site should give snit some ideas.
>
><https://www.teenvogue.com/story/taylor-swift-eras-tour-style-guide>
>
> Oh, one last thing.
> These are my OPINIONS based upon snit's posts.
> I am in no way attempting to speak FOR HIM.
> LOL!
>
> FUP to AFRL
>
Groups restored.
Snit is a moron.
That is something I did need to learn for myself, thanks in part to you and others, but there is no
helping snit.

--
Charlie Glock
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms"
- Thomas Jefferson 1776