Alan Browne wrote on Sat, 15 Jun 2024 18:01:01 -0400 :

>> You dishonestly snipped all of the context here,
>
> Its abject incompetence at trolling is belied by its child level efforts.

Heh heh heh... your whole life, Alan Browne & Jolly Roger, people told you
that you both were stupid - but not Apple. Apple loves you, Alan and Roger.

And, in turn, you defend all of Apple's flaws to the death, now don't you.
You deny every fact about Apple that you hate, now don't you?

Why?
Even Apple must love that you brazenly deny these published facts...
<https://screenrant.com/apple-product-security-update-lifespan/>
<https://support.apple.com/guide/deployment/about-software-updates-depc4c80847a/>
<https://hothardware.com/news/apple-admits-only-fully-patches-security-flaws-in-latest-os-releases>
<https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/10/apple-clarifies-security-update-policy-only-the-latest-oses-are-fully-patched/>

The fact you both deny every fact about Apple products that you hate, is
only one indicator that your entire life people told you that you're
stupid.

Another indicator is you have no adult rebuttal to the fact that Apple's
scheduled messaging only works inside the walled garden - and hence - not
in the real world.

Since you *hate* that fact that Apple's scheduled messages don't work in
the real world - all you can do - given your low IQ - is call the bearer of
that fact an "it" because somehow that makes it easier for you to deny all
facts about Apple that you hate.

Which wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't so many facts you hate about Apple.

Like this fact:
<https://www.wsj.com/tech/personal-tech/ios-18-ipados-18-iphone-apple-features-fall-2024-70d28f09>
"This only works with iMessage, so only with fellow Apple users."

Chris wrote on Sat, 15 Jun 2024 14:29:38 -0000 (UTC) :

>> What part about Apple's own published words do you claim are false?
>> <https://support.apple.com/guide/deployment/about-software-updates-depc4c80847a/>
>>
>> You're literally desperate to claim Apple didn't say what Apple said.
>
> I've explained it to you several times and yet you fail to grasp the simple
> concept. Apple's statement is ambiguous and so your interpretation and
> claim isn't categorically correct. There is an equivalent, alternative
> interpretation. Plus, there is direct evidence which contradicts your
> opinion.

Chris,

Please give me credit for understanding your childish argument that because
Microsoft fixed a bug last year in Windows XP, it means Microsoft fixed
every single bug in Windows XP that Microsoft knows about.

Your argument is patently absurd that WinXP has been FULLY SUPPORTED for 23
years, Chris.

You don't think that's not known to me that Alan Browne, Alan Baker, Jolly
Roger and you make the childish argument that because Google fixed a bug in
Android 4.3 two years ago, that Google has fixed every bug it knows about
in Android 4.3?

The childish argument you make about full support is patently absurd.

Just because Apple fixed a bug in iOS 16 last year, does not mean that
Apple has fixed every single bug in that iOS 16 release, Chris.

It just doesn't.

Only a child would make that absurd argument, and even so, it would apply
to Windows XP and Android 4.3 just as well if it held any basis in logic.

Since Windows XP released in 2001, that would mean, using your own absurd
argument, that Microsoft "FULLY PATCHED" Windows XP for over 23 years.

Your argument is absurd, Chris.
You're literally _desperate_ to deny Apple's own published words, Chris.
<https://screenrant.com/apple-product-security-update-lifespan/>
<https://support.apple.com/guide/deployment/about-software-updates-depc4c80847a/>
<https://hothardware.com/news/apple-admits-only-fully-patches-security-flaws-in-latest-os-releases>
<https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/10/apple-clarifies-security-update-policy-only-the-latest-oses-are-fully-patched/>

Think about that before make childish arguments that even Apple doesn't
make.