Lying Retard <lying-retard@linux.org> wrote in
news:74889eff21a772dd15be6d7b531b6e9e@dizum.com:

> This clown is a bullshitter and provides nothing of substance to
> support his bias.
>
> Written by Jack Wallen, Contributing Writer
>
> I started using Linux back in 1997. I had been using Windows 95 and
> found it to be, well, unreliable. Although I wound up tossing myself
> into the open-source deep end without a lifeboat, it didn't take me
> long to realize I'd found my "forever OS."
>
> Also: These 5 Linux file managers are better than what you're using
> now - and they're free
>
> But why? What makes Linux so special for me that I wouldn't even
> consider making the switch to either MacOS or Windows as my primary
> OS? Even though I do use MacOS for certain tasks (such as video
> editing), there's not been one instance when I considered making the
> permanent switch. As for Windows, well, every time I have to touch
> that operating system, I'm reminded why I never liked it from the
> beginning.
>
> Why don't we get to the method behind my madness?
>
> Are you ready?
>
> 1. It makes sense
> Whenever I have to work with another operating system, I find myself
> regularly thinking, "This doesn't make any sense!" Linux, on the
> other hand, was designed by someone (Linus Torvalds) who understood
> how to create an operating system in a logical manner.
>
> Here's a good example. On Windows, if you want to run a command, you
> have to run it from the folder in which the executable is saved. Say,
> for instance, you want to run Firefox from the command line. To do
> that on Windows, you might first have to change into the Mozilla
> Firefox directory and then issue the command start firefox.exe. On
> Linux, you can type firefox from any directory and the application
> will launch. This is possible on Linux because there are certain
> directories that are in a user's $PATH, which means the commands
> within those directories are recognized from anywhere in the
> filesystem. There's no extra work to be done. It's simple. It makes
> sense.

SMH, this clown isn't swift enough to work with a real OS like z/OS or
AIX. He sounds lazy too.

> I've always found that every configuration, every setup, every
> installation on Linux makes sense, from the low-level stuff all the
> way to the desktop.

Until it's broken, then just like Windoze, it must be reinstalled or
restored.

> 2. It's easy
> This might run counter to the public opinion, but Linux is actually
> far easier than either MacOS or Windows. I will admit that in those
> early days, Linux was challenging. However, over the years, the
> developers and designers listened to the users and created an
> operating system (and various distributions) that simplifies nearly
> every aspect of using a computer. And, before you think it, you don't
> have to use the command line on Linux. You could go your entire life
> with Linux and never so much as open the terminal application. When
> people ask me how hard it is to install Linux, I tell them, "If you
> can install an application on Windows, you can install the Linux
> operating system." That's how easy Linux is now.

Notice he says Linux and not "RedHat" or one of the other 250+ distros.

> Also: 5 Linux commands you need to know to troubleshoot problems
>
> Another area where Linux shines in its ease is installing
> applications. If you want an app, you open the desktop's app store,
> search for it, and click Install. If you download an installer (such
> as a .deb or .rpm file), most often your desktop is set up to
> automatically open the likes of GDebi (a GUI tool for installing
> downloaded applications). Or you could use the command line package
> manager, such as sudo apt-get install opera -y. If you can't find the
> app in the default repositories, try one of the universal package
> managers, like Snap (sudo snap install opera).
>
> It never ceases to amaze me how complicated some Windows app
> installations are. Even worse, you might wind up having to reboot the
> computer to complete the installation. The only time you ever have to
> reboot a Linux computer is when the kernel gets upgraded (unless
> you're using Fedora, which does often require a reboot).

False.

> 3. It lets me work how I want
> This one is important to me. I've always found both MacOS and Windows
> to be incredibly limiting in flexibility. I want to work in a way
> that best suits me, not Apple or Microsoft. Thanks to Linux, I can do
> that.
>
> If I don't like how something functions, I can change it. You see,
> Linux isn't locked down into one way of doing things. In fact, with
> Linux, there's a never-ending combination of how you can do things.
> This is made possible because of various distributions, desktop
> environments, window managers, package managers, and more.
>
> Also: Why I use the Linux tree command daily - and what it can do for
> you
>
> Here's a simple example. I copy/paste quite often. I'll be working on
> something and realize that I need to move a paragraph. At the same
> time, I might have copied a URL and need to paste it as a link.
> Instead of having to copy/paste twice, I can use Ctrl+c/Ctrl+v on the
> paragraph and use select/middle mouse click for the link. The middle
> mouse paste feature has always been such an efficient way of copying
> text and when you combine it with the traditional method, it makes
> things very easy.
>
> 4. It's flexible
> If you like, you can use Linux as is. Install Ubuntu or Linux Mint
> and use it as the developers intended. Or maybe you don't like the
> GNOME desktop, so you install Plasma. You prefer a dock instead of a
> traditional panel, so you install Cairo. You don't like having the
> dock on the bottom of the screen, so you move it to the left side.
>
> Also: The best Linux laptops
>
> With Linux, there is no vendor lock-in. You are not limited to what
> the desktop looks like, how it behaves, or what it does or does not
> do for you. Even within a single desktop environment, you can bend
> and twist it however you like. With GNOME, there are GNOME Extensions
> to add different features and behaviors. With Plasma, you can theme
> it, customize it, add widgets and plugins, and more. With Xfce� the
> sky's the limit. Linux is the ideal operating system for those who
> like to tinker and tweak. Or, if you don't, you'll find a variety of
> distributions, one of which will appeal to your aesthetic and use
> case.
>
> 5. It's secure
> In nearly thirty years of usage, I've only come across a single
> instance of malicious software. I'd inherited a job working on a
> Linux server that was poorly set up. Somehow, a rootkit was installed
> and I not only had to discover it was there, but also migrate
> everything to a new server. That was the only time such an occurrence
> happened.
>
> Also: Do you need antivirus on Linux?
>
> Other than that, I've never once worried about malware, ransomware,
> or viruses. Why? Linux is exponentially more secure than Windows and
> considerably more secure than MacOS. Before you think Linux is the
> perfect solution to solve all of your security issues, know that any
> time a computer is connected to a network it's vulnerable. The
> difference is how easily that vulnerability can be exploited.
>
> With Linux, it's not easy because the operating system was designed,
> from the ground up, with security at its heart. And with the help of
> SELinux and AppArmor, that security becomes even tighter. When using
> Windows (and even MacOS to an extent), it's always important to use
> an anti-virus/anti-malware solution. On Linux, that's not necessary.

There's not enough of it installed, running and connected to the
Internet to be worth while, stupid.

> And there you have it: five reasons why I'll never switch to Windows
> or MacOS as my go-to operating system.
>
> https://www.zdnet.com/article/ive-used-linux-for-30-years-5-reasons-
> why-ill-never-switch-to-windows-or-macos/

Here's the top reason why Jack Wallen is full of shit.

https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-33/Linux.html

On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 10:05:19 -0000 (UTC), Rivian Clunkers Use Linux wrote:

> Lying Retard <lying-retard@linux.org> wrote in
> news:74889eff21a772dd15be6d7b531b6e9e@dizum.com:
>
>> When using
>> Windows (and even MacOS to an extent), it's always important to use an
>> anti-virus/anti-malware solution. On Linux, that's not necessary.
>
> There's not enough of it installed, running and connected to the
> Internet to be worth while, stupid.

The whole Internet runs on Linux. It’s everywhere, and the security of the
Internet is crucially dependent on it.

On 11/10/2024 4:11 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Nov 2024 10:05:19 -0000 (UTC), Rivian Clunkers Use Linux wrote:
>
>> Lying Retard <lying-retard@linux.org> wrote in
>> news:74889eff21a772dd15be6d7b531b6e9e@dizum.com:
>>
>>> When using
>>> Windows (and even MacOS to an extent), it's always important to use an
>>> anti-virus/anti-malware solution. On Linux, that's not necessary.
>>
>> There's not enough of it installed, running and connected to the
>> Internet to be worth while, stupid.
>
> The whole Internet runs on Linux. It’s everywhere, and the security of the
> Internet is crucially dependent on it.

VxWorks not Linux. VxWorks is RTOS, Linux is not. Windows, while not
RTOS, can perform RTOS tasks better than Linux. If you're serious about
security in network equipment you use VxWorks.

Solaris will kick the shit out of Linux when it comes to throughput.