On 25/07/2024 21:35, D wrote:
> Let me also say, that even though I'm not a christian, there are some
> very good values inside christianity which more people should follow.
> Among other things, family values and building a stable society.

If Christianity didn't exist, we would have had to invent it.
Oh hang on, that' basically what Paul did, isn't it?

As well as Moses 'here's some tablets I prepared earlier'...

--
“Ideas are inherently conservative. They yield not to the attack of
other ideas but to the massive onslaught of circumstance"

- John K Galbraith

On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:

> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
>> Would you say there is a risk of elevated blood pressure if I had a look
>> at comp.os.linux.advocacy? ;)
>
>
> If you're running Linux, please do join us.

Ok, I'll have a look. =)

On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, CrudeSausage wrote:

> On 2024-07-25 4:33 p.m., D wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>
>>> On 2024-07-25 11:35 a.m., D wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2024-07-24 9:30 p.m., Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther! wrote:
>>>>>> Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
>>>>>> him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZ64k2BXAjs
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The GNOME team has censored -- and deleted the account -- of the
>>>>>> maintainer of Manjaro Linux GNOME Edition. Why? Because he linked to a
>>>>>> Lunduke article.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> GNOME bans Manjaro Core Team Member for uttering "Lunduke":
>>>>>> https://lunduke.locals.com/post/5908516/gnome-bans-manjaro-core-team-member-for-uttering-lunduke
>>>>>>
>>>>>> More from The Lunduke Journal:
>>>>>> https://lunduke.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, a fellow member of the Lunduke community. Welcome.
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed, Bryan's done a good job exposing the tyranny that has become
>>>>> central to the Linux development community. As users, we keep thinking
>>>>> that using Linux is a way of fighting against the corporate machine and
>>>>> a world similar to 1984. Instead, it seems that the Linux community has
>>>>> become exactly the monster we were fighting against.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is very much true! I have worked with the linux foundation, and I
>>>> can tell you that it is just full of CV-stuffing, incompetent middle
>>>> managers at the top. Really revolting creatures. I also read at the
>>>> Lunduke site, that only 2% of their income goes to linux.
>>>>
>>>> So after being exposed to it from the inside, I quickly stopped all
>>>> collaboration with them, and I do not accept any of their offers for help
>>>> since that would mean I had to adapt to their woke policies, which I
>>>> never will, and there was peace. ;)
>>>>
>>>> What I find fun is that every couple of years or so, someone reaches out
>>>> and asks me how it comes my events are so successful, and I tell them the
>>>> reason is that they are not woke and focus on technology and ban identity
>>>> politics.
>>>>
>>>> They then always politely nod, smile, and go away for a few years, while
>>>> nothing changes. =)
>>>
>>> I welcome more of your posts to comp.os.linux.advocacy where there is an
>>> unfortunate amount of woke clowns. Where do you usually hang out?
>>
>> Yes, I have noticed, sadly, that there is a lot of woke and socialist
>> clowns in the open source space, but I guess it is easy to mistake open
>> source for socialism, if you are no good at thinking. =/
>>
>> I usually lurk around here, alt.atheism, alt.philosophy and some other
>> channels.
>>
>> Would you say there is a risk of elevated blood pressure if I had a look at
>> comp.os.linux.advocacy? ;)
>
> Perhaps, but it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like Chris
> Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like Joel Crump
> will react to your posts.

Oh, I think it is not difficult to predict the reaction. Either they will
eventually block me, I will block them, we might block each other, or if
the group is woke enough, I will just lose interest and delete it from my
reader. ;)

On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:

> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>
>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>
>
> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>
>
Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
gender! ;)

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

> On 7/24/24 9:30 PM, Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther! wrote:
>> Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
>>
>> Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
>> him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.
>
> Gnome SUCKS anyway.
>

This is the truth!

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
> gender! ;)

That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that produce
the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or female
genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other strongly and
fairly uniformly.

--
Steve O'Hara-Smith
Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/
For forms of government let fools contest
Whate're is best administered is best - Alexander Pope

D wrote:
>
> This is good! That sends a clear signal not go support the gnome project
> and not use its software.
>

I haven't used Gnome since Jesus was goalkeeper for Nazareth FC.

On 26/07/2024 10:06, D wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>
>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>
>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>
>>
>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>
>>
> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
> gender! ;)

It's just another DILLIGAFF.

There was a boy in a frock in my old college's bar. I was there for a
reunion thing.
No one took any notice.
He stormed out in a huff.

--
“Progress is precisely that which rules and regulations did not foresee,”

– Ludwig von Mises

Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> writes:

> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>> gender! ;)
>
> That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that
> (with varying success) activates a very large number of other genes
> that produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male
> or female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
> strongly and fairly uniformly.

Yip. But we now live in the alternative facts era of short and simple
answers.

--
"DNA is a four letter word!" -- Yeti.

On 2024-07-26 3:32 a.m., 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
> On 7/24/24 9:30 PM, Heil Lunduke! Mein Forther! wrote:
>> Maintainer banned for naming our favorite Jewish Software Fuhrer!
>>
>> Lunduke is Jewish and somehow a bunch of queer white men keep calling
>> him, 'anti-semite'. Trans supremacist nutjobs beg for a final solution.
>
>   Gnome SUCKS anyway.

KDE sucks more though.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king
Joel Crump: "My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude."

On Fr 26 Jul 2024 at 10:37, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:

> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>> gender! ;)
>
> That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
> varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that produce
> the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or female
> genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other strongly and
> fairly uniformly.

Yes, and sometimes the X or Y chromosomes are doubled.
The world os a lot more complex than most people think.

'Andreas

--
ceterum censeo redmondinem esse delendam

On 26/07/2024 13:25, yeti wrote:
> Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> writes:
>
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>> gender! ;)
>>
>> That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
>> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that
>> (with varying success) activates a very large number of other genes
>> that produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male
>> or female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
>> strongly and fairly uniformly.
>
> Yip. But we now live in the alternative facts era of short and simple
> answers.
>
Reality is a social construct.

That is the new mantra of those who did philosophy, and socialogy, but
completely failed to understand what they were being taught.

--
There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale
returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.

Mark Twain

D wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>
>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Would you say there is a risk of elevated blood pressure if I had a look
>>> at comp.os.linux.advocacy? ;)
>>
>>
>> If you're running Linux, please do join us.
>
> Ok, I'll have a look. =)
>
>
If you like to ass fuck guys you're Joel's type.

https://postimg.cc/QBGv4Zrz

On 26/07/2024 13:57, Andreas Eder wrote:
> On Fr 26 Jul 2024 at 10:37, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>> gender! ;)
>>
>> That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
>> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
>> varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that produce
>> the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or female
>> genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other strongly and
>> fairly uniformly.
>
> Yes, and sometimes the X or Y chromosomes are doubled.
> The world os a lot more complex than most people think.
>
Yawn.

The ratio of transgender narcissists to those with abnormal chromosones
is about 10,000:1

Only ArtStudents™ talk in terms of 'could be's'
STEM students want to know the probability.

Have you noticed that the only person who has mentioned their sexuality
claimed to have a transgender girlfriend?
I rest my case.

> 'Andreas
>

--
"The most difficult subjects can be explained to the most slow witted
man if he has not formed any idea of them already; but the simplest
thing cannot be made clear to the most intelligent man if he is firmly
persuaded that he knows already, without a shadow of doubt, what is laid
before him."

- Leo Tolstoy

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:

> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>> gender! ;)
>
> That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
> varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that produce
> the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or female
> genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other strongly and
> fairly uniformly.
>

I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a useful
guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or perhaps
the ability of having a child. It is really a very trivial question.

The only ones trying to make it not trivial, and failing miserably, are
the woke and socialist crowd.

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Woozy Song wrote:

> D wrote:
>>
>> This is good! That sends a clear signal not go support the gnome project
>> and not use its software.
>>
>
> I haven't used Gnome since Jesus was goalkeeper for Nazareth FC.
>

I will shamelessly steal this response! Brilliant!

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> On 26/07/2024 10:06, D wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>
>>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>
>>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>>
>>>
>>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>>
>>>
>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>> gender! ;)
>
> It's just another DILLIGAFF.
>
> There was a boy in a frock in my old college's bar. I was there for a reunion
> thing.
> No one took any notice.
> He stormed out in a huff.
>

True. A lot of it is just attention seeking, virtue signalling and in
darker cases, badly disguised attempts at power grabbing through woke
politics.

The best way is to just ignore them, or in more serious cases, tell them
to get the f*ck out of where ever they are.

I have used both techniques with great success, but option 2 is a lot of
fun! =)

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, yeti wrote:

> Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> writes:
>
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>> gender! ;)
>>
>> That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
>> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that
>> (with varying success) activates a very large number of other genes
>> that produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male
>> or female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
>> strongly and fairly uniformly.
>
> Yip. But we now live in the alternative facts era of short and simple
> answers.

Except that gender is a fact with short and simple answers. Only
socialist, woke people and retards do not understand what a man and a
woman is.

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> On 26/07/2024 13:25, yeti wrote:
>> Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> writes:
>>
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>> gender! ;)
>>>
>>> That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
>>> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that
>>> (with varying success) activates a very large number of other genes
>>> that produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male
>>> or female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
>>> strongly and fairly uniformly.
>>
>> Yip. But we now live in the alternative facts era of short and simple
>> answers.
>>
> Reality is a social construct.
>
> That is the new mantra of those who did philosophy, and socialogy, but
> completely failed to understand what they were being taught.

And a dangerous one. Being hit in the head with a socially constructed
rock, still hurts! ;) But I certainly wouldn't mind if a lot of socialists
here did try to jump out the window, since gravity is obviously a social
construct! ;)

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Anton Ray Eaks wrote:

> D wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>>
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Would you say there is a risk of elevated blood pressure if I had a look
>>>> at comp.os.linux.advocacy? ;)
>>>
>>>
>>> If you're running Linux, please do join us.
>>
>> Ok, I'll have a look. =)
>>
>>
> If you like to ass fuck guys you're Joel's type.
>
> https://postimg.cc/QBGv4Zrz

No need... based on the few messages here, it's a complete waste of time.
Just socialists, wokes and probably a negro or two there.

On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200
D <nospam@example.net> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
> > D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
> >> gender! ;)
> >
> > That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
> > found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
> > varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
> > produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
> > female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
> > strongly and fairly uniformly.
> >
>
> I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
> useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or

About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.

--
Steve O'Hara-Smith
Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/
For forms of government let fools contest
Whate're is best administered is best - Alexander Pope

Someone want to explain what this cretinous edgelord drama is doing in
alt.folklore.computers?

On 26/07/2024 17:44, D wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

>>>
>> Reality is a social construct.
>>
>> That is the new mantra of those who did philosophy, and socialogy, but
>> completely failed to understand what they were being taught.
>
> And a dangerous one. Being hit in the head with a socially constructed
> rock, still hurts! ;) But I certainly wouldn't mind if a lot of
> socialists here did try to jump out the window, since gravity is
> obviously a social construct! ;)

Oh that's easy, self identify as a carrion crow and Robert is a relative.

--
"A point of view can be a dangerous luxury when substituted for insight
and understanding".

Marshall McLuhan

On 26/07/2024 18:18, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:38:37 +0200
> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024, Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:06:25 +0200
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>>>> gender! ;)
>>>
>>> That is surprisingly complex - there's a gene which is usually
>>> found on the Y chromosone (but sometimes on an X chromosome) that (with
>>> varying success) activates a very large number of other genes that
>>> produce the various male characteristics. Nobody is purely male or
>>> female genetically but most of us are biased one way or the other
>>> strongly and fairly uniformly.
>>>
>>
>> I think X and Y are established and well known enough to serve as a
>> useful guide. We can add to that, if necessary, other visual criterias or
>
> About as well established as phlogiston, it is not that simple.
>
Actually it is.

--
"A point of view can be a dangerous luxury when substituted for insight
and understanding".

Marshall McLuhan

D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Jul 2024, Joel wrote:
>> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>
>>> it will be fun to watch how limp-wristed individuals like
>>> Chris Ahlstrom or faggots in danger of spontaneously combusting like
>>> Joel Crump will react to your posts.
>>
>> My girlfriend has a penis, but she's not a dude.
>>
>Ahh... the book says, show me your chromosomes and I'll show you your
>gender! ;)

She's biologically male, sure, but her gender identity is clearly
female.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.