"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5pe09jlimvsv05nvdvqj9pqb78qonn31he@4ax.com...
> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>why are you concerning yourself with MY system?
>
>
> You post with it, it tells me something about you, that you're
> clinging to WLM and presumably Win7. That's oddball behavior, in
> 2024.

That's ok, we feel the same about your denial of gay sexual relationship
with a cross-dressing homosexual man...

.... that's oddball behavior.

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:

>>>>>>>>I'm not pretending anything, I'm openly saying I'm running Forte Agent
>>>>>>>>under Wine, because why not?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Because you have to since Linux apps suck so bad.
>>>>>
>>>>><CRICKETS>
>>>
>>><CRICKETS>
>
>>I disagree.
>
>You're a lying Gen-X asshole, so you know I'm right.

You snipped "I use PC Linux, it seems just fine compared to the
commercial platforms." I wouldn't use it if it weren't competing with
Microsoft's platform when the latter is the dominant one for my own
hardware. But people like you will use Win7 and try to skirt around
the need for Linux, but it's disingenuous when the apps begin to lose
support for your OS version.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>I'm not pretending anything, I'm openly saying I'm running Forte Agent
>>>>>>>>>under Wine, because why not?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Because you have to since Linux apps suck so bad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>><CRICKETS>
>>>>
>>>><CRICKETS>

<CRICKETS>

>>>I disagree.
>>
>>You're a lying Gen-X asshole, so you know I'm right.
>
>
>You snipped "I use PC Linux, it seems just fine compared to the
>commercial platforms."

I snipped it because it has nothing to do with what we're talking
about, stupid Gen-X asshole.

[Default] "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> typed:

>
>
>"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
>in message
>news:s0p09jttcn8lg098emeinruvm7jne17nrr@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
>> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>
>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>he runs a newsreader designed for Windows and must pretend to have
>>>>>>>>Windows in order to run it, because all the news clients of Linux
>>>>>>>>suck.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>LOL
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm not pretending anything, I'm openly saying I'm running Forte Agent
>>>>>>>under Wine, because why not?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Because you have to since Linux apps suck so bad.
>>>>
>>>><CRICKETS>
>>
>> <CRICKETS>
>>
>>
>>>>>>LOL
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You are also running Agent 8.
>>>>
>>>>And I'm running Windows, and I KNOW it runs better under Windows than
>>>>it does in WINE, because I've used both, you stupid Gen-X asshole.
>>>
>>>How recently? I had some issues with *CrossOver*, in 2010, compared
>>>to generic Wine today.
>>
>> Probably because you're a dumb Gen-X asshole, but mostly because WINE
>> does a shit job of pretending to be a real operating system with
>> useful apps that work.
>
>yea, but we all know that Fake Windows works so much better than actual
>Windows, and he can pretend that a cheap imitation is better than the real
>thing.
>
>It's sort of how his boyfriend is a cheap knockoff of a real woman...
>
>Apparently Joel prefers the fakes.
>

Good point! He probably wears a $39.00 Rolex too.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:vin29jput36a506ae2v1pe35be844pev60@4ax.com...
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>I'm not pretending anything, I'm openly saying I'm running Forte
>>>>>>>>>Agent
>>>>>>>>>under Wine, because why not?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Because you have to since Linux apps suck so bad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>><CRICKETS>
>>>>
>>>><CRICKETS>
>>
>>>I disagree.
>>
>>You're a lying Gen-X asshole, so you know I'm right.
>
>
> You snipped "I use PC Linux, it seems just fine compared to the
> commercial platforms." I wouldn't use it if it weren't competing with
> Microsoft's platform when the latter is the dominant one for my own
> hardware. But people like you will use Win7 and try to skirt around
> the need for Linux, but it's disingenuous when the apps begin to lose
> support for your OS version.

There is no need of Linux. Even you admit to now using programs designed for
Linux because the windows version is better for you.

In fact, you have yet to show any superiority to Linux. It has life
cycles.... Support is dropped.. programs aren't updated or supported.. New
versions don't support the hardware or the existing programs...in sort it
sounds like any other operating system.

Scout wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> In fact, you have yet to show any superiority to Linux. It has life
> cycles.... Support is dropped.. programs aren't updated or supported.. New
> versions don't support the hardware or the existing programs...in sort it
> sounds like any other operating system.

+1

Except, of course, for long running programs like GIMP, LibreOffice,
mpd, VLC, and on and on and on. Been using the same suite of nice programs
since ~2000.

However, the superiority of Linux is that it is far more configurable than
Windows of OSX.

For some, that's a deficit, but not for me.

--
Q: How do you shoot a blue elephant? A: With a blue-elephant gun.
Q: How do you shoot a pink elephant? A: Twist its trunk until it turns
blue, then shoot it with a blue-elephant gun.

On 7/11/2024 6:24 PM, Joel wrote:

> You are also running Agent 8. Clearly, you agree with me that it's
> the best of the GUI newsreaders, so that you use Windows is convenient
> to using Agent, but luckily so is Linux with Wine.

When it works I like Thunderbird/Betterbird the most.

But the combination of TBird/BBird and blocknews will test your patience
lately. I can't get through more than 10 posts without it dropping the
connection and refusing to reconnect and read any more posts until you
restart the reader.

This didn't happen with Pan (on Windows).

DFS: I can't get through more than 10 posts without it dropping the
connection and refusing to reconnect

Try an "AstraWeb.COM" "Block Account".
Singapore headquarters, US Server.
UsenetReviewz.COM/astraweb-review/

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

>> You are also running Agent 8. Clearly, you agree with me that it's
>> the best of the GUI newsreaders, so that you use Windows is convenient
>> to using Agent, but luckily so is Linux with Wine.
>
>When it works I like Thunderbird/Betterbird the most.
>
>But the combination of TBird/BBird and blocknews will test your patience
>lately. I can't get through more than 10 posts without it dropping the
>connection and refusing to reconnect and read any more posts until you
>restart the reader.
>
>This didn't happen with Pan (on Windows).

I had Betterbird under Windows, and I have Thunderbird by default with
Mint, as secondary readers they're pretty cool, but Agent is where I'm
at home. That it does so well with Wine is a blessing.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 16:12:10 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote:

>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>
>>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>
>>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>
>>
>>What's wrong with her?
>
>If's a freak of nature.
>
>Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."

Neither do photoshop jobs. Yecch! If he smells like pussy, I want it to be because he
got some, not because he has one.

Swill

On Sun, 28 Jul 2024 13:25:18 +0000, ??????????Jen?????????? Dershmender
???????????????????? <root@127.0.0.1> wrote:

>I'm guessing you have lots of experience sniffing out dicks.

Bulges are my passion.

Swill

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:
>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>
>>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>
>>What's wrong with her?
>
>If's a freak of nature.
>
>Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."

She looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
"freaks", dumb old boomer retard.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

In article <815daj5a8sjsninkhsqr1drbauv4rfijtn@4ax.com>, joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
> >>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
> >>>>
> >>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
> >>
> >>What's wrong with her?
> >
> >If's a freak of nature.
> >
> >Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."
>
>
> he looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
> "freaks", dumb old boomer retard.
>
>
https://postimg.cc/zHzMvV6Z

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>>
>>>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>>
>>>What's wrong with her?
>>
>>If's a freak of nature.
>>
>>Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."
>
>
>She looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
>"freaks", dumb old boomer retard.

And Joel runs away from the argument, just like he always does.

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:
>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>>>
>>>>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>>>
>>>>What's wrong with her?
>>>
>>>If's a freak of nature.
>>>
>>>Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."
>>
>>She looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
>>"freaks", dumb old boomer retard.
>
>And Joel runs away from the argument, just like he always does.

You're the one doing that, you'd have put her in "the river" to drown
as an infant, you call her a "freak of nature", as if there's anything
bad about having a cock-like clit, I think it's kind of attractive,
actually, maybe open your dumb boomer mind.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>>What's wrong with her?
>>>>
>>>>If's a freak of nature.
>>>>
>>>>Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."
>>>
>>>She looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
>>>"freaks", dumb old boomer retard.
>>
>>And Joel runs away from the argument, just like he always does.
>
>
>You're the one doing that

Pathetic IKYABWAM defense.

>, you'd have put her in "the river" to drown
>as an infant, you call her a "freak of nature", as if there's anything
>bad about having a cock-like clit, I think it's kind of attractive,

You should be taken to the river too

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:
>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>>>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What's wrong with her?
>>>>>
>>>>>If's a freak of nature.
>>>>>
>>>>>Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."
>>>>
>>>>She looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
>>>>"freaks", dumb old boomer retard.
>>>
>>>And Joel runs away from the argument, just like he always does.
>>
>>You're the one doing that
>
>Pathetic IKYABWAM defense.
>
>>, you'd have put her in "the river" to drown
>>as an infant, you call her a "freak of nature", as if there's anything
>>bad about having a cock-like clit, I think it's kind of attractive,
>
>You should be taken to the river too

Gun-nut cracker retarded boomer imbecile, kill yourself.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-07-28, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>>C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>>>>
>>>>>What's wrong with her?
>>>>
>>>>If's a freak of nature.
>>>>
>>>>Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."
>>>
>>>She looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
>>>"freaks", dumb old boomer retard.
>>
>>And Joel runs away from the argument, just like he always does.
>
>
> You're the one doing that, you'd have put her in "the river" to drown
> as an infant, you call her a "freak of nature", as if there's anything
> bad about having a cock-like clit, I think it's kind of attractive,
> actually, maybe open your dumb boomer mind.
>
Well she does give new meaning to the phrase 'go fuck yourself'.

--
Nippy

Nippy wrote:
> On 2024-07-28, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>>>>>> C_V <c_v@invalid.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Having certain genitalia doesn't make one a gender necessarily.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://s1.pictoa.com/media/galleries/022/639/02263954b9aac6d33c4/104697854b9aac9807b8.jpg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's wrong with her?
>>>>>
>>>>> If's a freak of nature.
>>>>>
>>>>> Deformities and birth defects do not equal a "new gender."
>>>>
>>>> She looks perfectly fuckable to me, get over your insecurity about
>>>> "freaks", dumb old boomer retard.
>>>
>>> And Joel runs away from the argument, just like he always does.
>>
>>
>> You're the one doing that, you'd have put her in "the river" to drown
>> as an infant, you call her a "freak of nature", as if there's anything
>> bad about having a cock-like clit, I think it's kind of attractive,
>> actually, maybe open your dumb boomer mind.
>>
> Well she does give new meaning to the phrase 'go fuck yourself'.
>
>
but , pippy

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Gun-nut cracker retarded boomer imbecile, kill yourself.

Poor triggered Joel.

Wonder why his parent didn't drown him in the river?

On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 05:37:03 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote:

>[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>
>>Gun-nut cracker retarded boomer imbecile, kill yourself.
>
>Poor triggered Joel.
>
>Wonder why his parent didn't drown him in the river?

He couldn't sink because his daddy kept pumping him back up.

Swill

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:

>>Gun-nut cracker retarded boomer imbecile, kill yourself.
>
>Poor triggered Joel.
>
>Wonder why his parent didn't drown him in the river?

I'm an asset to humanity.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[Default] ??????????Jen?????????? Dershmender ????????????????????
<root@127.0.0.1> typed:

>Did you kill a pet as a child, Klaus?

Are you masturbating right now?

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>Gun-nut cracker retarded boomer imbecile, kill yourself.
>>
>>Poor triggered Joel.
>>
>>Wonder why his parent didn't drown him in the river?
>
>
>I'm an asset to humanity.

No, you're a waster of oxygen.

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:

>>>>Gun-nut cracker retarded boomer imbecile, kill yourself.
>>>
>>>Poor triggered Joel.
>>>
>>>Wonder why his parent didn't drown him in the river?
>>
>>I'm an asset to humanity.
>
>No, you're a waster of oxygen.

Just like the intersexed baby, huh, psycho? You're an admitted would-
be *murderer*. You should be put in a criminal psychiatric facility.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.