On 2025-01-06 12:37, Joel wrote:
> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>> On 1/6/2025 10:23 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-05 20:50, Joel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I might hate "Whitey" but *you* aren't him.
>>>
>>> Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend whatever
>>> pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be
>>> thankful for what Whites have created.
>>
>> +10000000000000
>>
>> Joel (and other ungrateful negroids) don't verbally appreciate what
>> Whites have created and allowed them to enjoy. They ALL know in their
>> hearts that being forced to live in the African shitholes they belong in
>> would be a literal nightmare.
>>
>> I know I'm lucky as hell to have been born a Caucasian male in a Western
>> country, at this time in history (computing, technology, Internet).
>>
>> I can't even imagine being born poor and black and female in South Sudan.
>
>
> I like white people and in some respects *am* one.

Not in "some respects," a pasty-faced guy like you can be nothing else.
Don't fool yourself: by surrendering to the coloured populations, you're
only ensuring that once they have the opportunity, they will liquidate
you. They see you as little more than a useful idiot for the time being.
They will never allow you to live in peace because she's a thing is
contrary to their identity. Look at how well they treated Whites in
Rhodesia before they turned it into a joke. Look now at how they're
treating Whites in South Africa. That is your fate.

Acknowledge that your race is accomplished and that it has done little
other than attempt to civilize the savage. Unfortunately, no matter how
much we do to help them, they will cry out at being turned into
something other than the barbarians they have always been.

--
Andrzej (Andre) Matuch
Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch
Zephyrus G14 GA401QM on Fedora 41
KDE supporting member

On 2025-01-06 14:21, Joel wrote:
> Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
>
>>>> Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend whatever
>>>> pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be
>>>> thankful for what Whites have created.
>>>
>>> That's not what I think of as Whitey.
>>
>> You can interpret Whitey in your own way, but the definition of Whitey
>> includes the entire continent of Europe and its colonies when they were
>> inhabited mostly by Europeans. Whether you want to admit it to yourself
>> or not, it is because of Whitey that the Ottomans stopped growing their
>> empire. It is also Whitey who neutralized the pirate threat in the
>> Mediterranean where Muslim pirates enslaved coastal populations all the
>> way to Ireland at a number of around 1.25 million, including Americans
>> who had never even had a cross word with them. It is because of Whitey
>> in general that blacks are no longer living as slaves in the West even
>> though the practice still exists in their home continent. The reality is
>> that the people who complain about Whitey can barely write their own
>> names, much less form a sentence, so they have no idea what really
>> happened and how good life is as a result of "the oppressors."
>
> The Caucasian contributions to achievement of a better world are
> remarkable, but it's dangerous to think it reflects a generalized
> superiority.

Whether you want to admit it or not, Whites have made greater
contributions to humanity which essentially results in them being
superior. Let's not forget that they were the first to develop a
republic and democracy as well, systems superior to what even the Asians
were using. However, there is no greater example of example of White
superiority than the story of how 464 White settlers defeated 25,000
Zulus in the Battle of Blood River.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Blood_River>

Remember that the 464 settlers had single-fire guns which needed to be
reloaded constantly. They were, however, organized... something that
blacks can't manage to be _to this day_. The Zulus essentially figured
that sheer numbers being thrown like lemmings at the Whites would be
enough to defeat them, but Whites believed in some magic called strategy.

--
Andrzej (Andre) Matuch
Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch
Zephyrus G14 GA401QM on Fedora 41
KDE supporting member

Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:

>> I like white people and in some respects *am* one.
>
>Not in "some respects," a pasty-faced guy like you can be nothing else.
>Don't fool yourself: by surrendering to the coloured populations, you're
>only ensuring that once they have the opportunity, they will liquidate
>you. They see you as little more than a useful idiot for the time being.
>They will never allow you to live in peace because she's a thing is
>contrary to their identity. Look at how well they treated Whites in
>Rhodesia before they turned it into a joke. Look now at how they're
>treating Whites in South Africa. That is your fate.
>
>Acknowledge that your race is accomplished and that it has done little
>other than attempt to civilize the savage. Unfortunately, no matter how
>much we do to help them, they will cry out at being turned into
>something other than the barbarians they have always been.

I'm not white, deep down. I don't have the perception you have, of
non-whites. They're just people.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Andrzej Matuch wrote:
> On 2025-01-06 12:37, Joel wrote:
>> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>>> On 1/6/2025 10:23 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>>>> On 2025-01-05 20:50, Joel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I might hate "Whitey" but *you* aren't him.
>>>>
>>>> Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend
>>>> whatever
>>>> pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be
>>>> thankful for what Whites have created.
>>>
>>> +10000000000000
>>>
>>> Joel (and other ungrateful negroids) don't verbally appreciate what
>>> Whites have created and allowed them to enjoy.  They ALL know in their
>>> hearts that being forced to live in the African shitholes they belong in
>>> would be a literal nightmare.
>>>
>>> I know I'm lucky as hell to have been born a Caucasian male in a Western
>>> country, at this time in history (computing, technology, Internet).
>>>
>>> I can't even imagine being born poor and black and female in South
>>> Sudan.
>>
>>
>> I like white people and in some respects *am* one.
>
> Not in "some respects," a pasty-faced guy like you can be nothing else.
> Don't fool yourself: by surrendering to the coloured populations, you're
> only ensuring that once they have the opportunity, they will liquidate
> you. They see you as little more than a useful idiot for the time being.
> They will never allow you to live in peace because she's a thing is
> contrary to their identity. Look at how well they treated Whites in
> Rhodesia before they turned it into a joke. Look now at how they're
> treating Whites in South Africa. That is your fate.
>
> Acknowledge that your race is accomplished and that it has done little
> other than attempt to civilize the savage. Unfortunately, no matter how
> much we do to help them, they will cry out at being turned into
> something other than the barbarians they have always been.
>
>
Yes, avoid the groid at all costs.

https://youtu.be/aRWAYKJ4IJI

Joel wrote:
> I'm not white.
>
>
You're a delusional fuckwit.

https://postimg.cc/8F9Qn6kC

On 2025-01-06 14:45, Beavis wrote:
> Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>> On 2025-01-06 12:37, Joel wrote:
>>> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>>>> On 1/6/2025 10:23 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-01-05 20:50, Joel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I might hate "Whitey" but *you* aren't him.
>>>>>
>>>>> Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend
>>>>> whatever
>>>>> pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be
>>>>> thankful for what Whites have created.
>>>>
>>>> +10000000000000
>>>>
>>>> Joel (and other ungrateful negroids) don't verbally appreciate what
>>>> Whites have created and allowed them to enjoy.  They ALL know in their
>>>> hearts that being forced to live in the African shitholes they
>>>> belong in
>>>> would be a literal nightmare.
>>>>
>>>> I know I'm lucky as hell to have been born a Caucasian male in a
>>>> Western
>>>> country, at this time in history (computing, technology, Internet).
>>>>
>>>> I can't even imagine being born poor and black and female in South
>>>> Sudan.
>>>
>>>
>>> I like white people and in some respects *am* one.
>>
>> Not in "some respects," a pasty-faced guy like you can be nothing
>> else. Don't fool yourself: by surrendering to the coloured
>> populations, you're only ensuring that once they have the opportunity,
>> they will liquidate you. They see you as little more than a useful
>> idiot for the time being. They will never allow you to live in peace
>> because she's a thing is contrary to their identity. Look at how well
>> they treated Whites in Rhodesia before they turned it into a joke.
>> Look now at how they're treating Whites in South Africa. That is your
>> fate.
>>
>> Acknowledge that your race is accomplished and that it has done little
>> other than attempt to civilize the savage. Unfortunately, no matter
>> how much we do to help them, they will cry out at being turned into
>> something other than the barbarians they have always been.
>>
> >
> Yes, avoid the groid at all costs.
>
> https://youtu.be/aRWAYKJ4IJI

He considers going outside to the ice cream truck to be "his exercise
for the day." And people wonder why I am no longer surprised when some
of these people fail in life.

--
Andrzej (Andre) Matuch
Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch
Zephyrus G14 GA401QM on Fedora 41
KDE supporting member

Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:

>>>>> Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend whatever
>>>>> pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be
>>>>> thankful for what Whites have created.
>>>>
>>>> That's not what I think of as Whitey.
>>>
>>> You can interpret Whitey in your own way, but the definition of Whitey
>>> includes the entire continent of Europe and its colonies when they were
>>> inhabited mostly by Europeans. Whether you want to admit it to yourself
>>> or not, it is because of Whitey that the Ottomans stopped growing their
>>> empire. It is also Whitey who neutralized the pirate threat in the
>>> Mediterranean where Muslim pirates enslaved coastal populations all the
>>> way to Ireland at a number of around 1.25 million, including Americans
>>> who had never even had a cross word with them. It is because of Whitey
>>> in general that blacks are no longer living as slaves in the West even
>>> though the practice still exists in their home continent. The reality is
>>> that the people who complain about Whitey can barely write their own
>>> names, much less form a sentence, so they have no idea what really
>>> happened and how good life is as a result of "the oppressors."
> >
>> The Caucasian contributions to achievement of a better world are
>> remarkable, but it's dangerous to think it reflects a generalized
>> superiority.
>
>Whether you want to admit it or not, Whites have made greater
>contributions to humanity which essentially results in them being
>superior. Let's not forget that they were the first to develop a
>republic and democracy as well, systems superior to what even the Asians
>were using. However, there is no greater example of example of White
>superiority than the story of how 464 White settlers defeated 25,000
>Zulus in the Battle of Blood River.
><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Blood_River>
>
>Remember that the 464 settlers had single-fire guns which needed to be
>reloaded constantly. They were, however, organized... something that
>blacks can't manage to be _to this day_. The Zulus essentially figured
>that sheer numbers being thrown like lemmings at the Whites would be
>enough to defeat them, but Whites believed in some magic called strategy.

Just don't forget that we form consciousness collectively, individual
achievements and group efforts are interdependent with everything
going around. It's dangerous to become arrogant or self-satisfied.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 1/6/2025 2:45 PM, Beavis wrote:

> avoid the groid

ha!

I'll be using that in YouTube comments (which were uncensored until
shortly after George Floyd was kilt. Now you get warnings, then 24 hour
bans, or sometimes get your channel deleted.)

Also: "Around blacks never relax"

On 2025-01-06 15:00, Joel wrote:
> Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
>
>>>>>> Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend whatever
>>>>>> pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be
>>>>>> thankful for what Whites have created.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not what I think of as Whitey.
>>>>
>>>> You can interpret Whitey in your own way, but the definition of Whitey
>>>> includes the entire continent of Europe and its colonies when they were
>>>> inhabited mostly by Europeans. Whether you want to admit it to yourself
>>>> or not, it is because of Whitey that the Ottomans stopped growing their
>>>> empire. It is also Whitey who neutralized the pirate threat in the
>>>> Mediterranean where Muslim pirates enslaved coastal populations all the
>>>> way to Ireland at a number of around 1.25 million, including Americans
>>>> who had never even had a cross word with them. It is because of Whitey
>>>> in general that blacks are no longer living as slaves in the West even
>>>> though the practice still exists in their home continent. The reality is
>>>> that the people who complain about Whitey can barely write their own
>>>> names, much less form a sentence, so they have no idea what really
>>>> happened and how good life is as a result of "the oppressors."
>>>
>>> The Caucasian contributions to achievement of a better world are
>>> remarkable, but it's dangerous to think it reflects a generalized
>>> superiority.
>>
>> Whether you want to admit it or not, Whites have made greater
>> contributions to humanity which essentially results in them being
>> superior. Let's not forget that they were the first to develop a
>> republic and democracy as well, systems superior to what even the Asians
>> were using. However, there is no greater example of example of White
>> superiority than the story of how 464 White settlers defeated 25,000
>> Zulus in the Battle of Blood River.
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Blood_River>
>>
>> Remember that the 464 settlers had single-fire guns which needed to be
>> reloaded constantly. They were, however, organized... something that
>> blacks can't manage to be _to this day_. The Zulus essentially figured
>> that sheer numbers being thrown like lemmings at the Whites would be
>> enough to defeat them, but Whites believed in some magic called strategy.
>
>
> Just don't forget that we form consciousness collectively, individual
> achievements and group efforts are interdependent with everything
> going around. It's dangerous to become arrogant or self-satisfied.

Let me know when people who aren't White or Asian contribute to that
collective consciousness instead of taking credit for it.

--
Andrzej (Andre) Matuch
Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch
Zephyrus G14 GA401QM on Fedora 41
KDE supporting member

On 1/6/25 2:21 PM, Joel wrote:
> Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
>
>>>> Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend whatever
>>>> pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be
>>>> thankful for what Whites have created.
>>>
>>> That's not what I think of as Whitey.
>>
>> You can interpret Whitey in your own way, but the definition of Whitey
>> includes the entire continent of Europe and its colonies when they were
>> inhabited mostly by Europeans. Whether you want to admit it to yourself
>> or not, it is because of Whitey that the Ottomans stopped growing their
>> empire. It is also Whitey who neutralized the pirate threat in the
>> Mediterranean where Muslim pirates enslaved coastal populations all the
>> way to Ireland at a number of around 1.25 million, including Americans
>> who had never even had a cross word with them. It is because of Whitey
>> in general that blacks are no longer living as slaves in the West even
>> though the practice still exists in their home continent. The reality is
>> that the people who complain about Whitey can barely write their own
>> names, much less form a sentence, so they have no idea what really
>> happened and how good life is as a result of "the oppressors."
>
>
> The Caucasian contributions to achievement of a better world are
> remarkable, but it's dangerous to think it reflects a generalized
> superiority.

Ask someone who's read Jared Diamond's "Guns, Germs & Steel" (1997).

-hh

On 1/4/25 2:58 AM, vallor wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 07:37:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
> wrote in <vlaogf$c5ch$4@dont-email.me>:
>
>> On 2025-01-03, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>
>>>> What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying
>>>> to imply Hispanics aren't white?
>>>
>>> Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics
>>> whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White.
>>
>> I consider white Latinos white. "Hispanic" is a language group, not a
>> racial group.
>
> And they are Spanish/Indigenous descendants.
>
> (I guess Spain isn't in Europe anymore? Learn something
> every day!)

Yup. Fun fact: the 1930 Census added the category of "Mexican". Prior
to that, they were classified as either "White", "Indian", or "Other".

"Mexican" disappeared for the 1940, 50 & 60 Censuses; 1970 had "Mexican,
Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central/South America, Other Spanish" category:

<https://www.census.gov/data-tools/demo/race/MREAD_1790_2010.html>

-hh

On 2025-01-06, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 10:08:03 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
>
>> When they talk about "cultural appropriation" they're usually talking
>> about food and Halloween customs. Really stupid stuff that only vapid
>> morons would worry about.
>
> https://www.florabelletheband.com/about-6
>
> The local vapid morons are in a dither about this band. I don't care for
> their genre but that's neither here nor there. The original name of the
> band was 'War Pony' and the posters had an Indian motif. After much
> bitching about cultural appropriation Schulz changed the name to
> Florabelle. However she didn't grovel enough to satisfy the morons

You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when
Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual
prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it "his
movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't
like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard about it.
Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more
apologies.

> https://nbcmontana.com/news/local/zacc-changes-lineup-after-music-
> festival-artist-backlash
>
> fwiw, I did see Florabelle perform at a festival last summer but I've
> never heard of Running Crane.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 2025-01-07 02:49, RonB wrote:
> On 2025-01-06, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 10:08:03 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
>>
>>> When they talk about "cultural appropriation" they're usually talking
>>> about food and Halloween customs. Really stupid stuff that only vapid
>>> morons would worry about.
>>
>> https://www.florabelletheband.com/about-6
>>
>> The local vapid morons are in a dither about this band. I don't care for
>> their genre but that's neither here nor there. The original name of the
>> band was 'War Pony' and the posters had an Indian motif. After much
>> bitching about cultural appropriation Schulz changed the name to
>> Florabelle. However she didn't grovel enough to satisfy the morons
>
> You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when
> Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual
> prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it "his
> movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't
> like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard about it.
> Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more
> apologies.

For what it's worth, Braveheart is one of the best movies ever made.
Additionally, the homosexual nature of the prince in that movie is a
theme stolen in "Those About To Die" on Amazon about the Roman Empire.
Vespasian's son Domitian is such a faggot that you're just anticipating
his spontaneous combustion.

--
Andrzej (Andre) Matuch
Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch
Zephyrus G14 GA401QM on Fedora 41
KDE supporting member

On 1/7/2025 2:49 AM, RonB wrote:

> You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when
> Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual
> prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it "his
> movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't
> like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard about it.
> Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more
> apologies.

I saw Braveheart in the theater on opening weekend, and when King
Richard shoved a gayboy (his gay son's lover) out a high window to his
death, most of the audience - including me - laughed out loud.

The queer "community" was outraged that everyone laughed at that scene.
But I didn't laugh because he was gay - it happened so fast and he
screamed on the way down... you have to see it to understand.

Gibson's a masterful movie director who loves bloodletting on screen.
Apocalypto is one of his best.

On 2025-01-07, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
> On 2025-01-07 02:49, RonB wrote:
>> On 2025-01-06, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 10:08:03 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
>>>
>>>> When they talk about "cultural appropriation" they're usually talking
>>>> about food and Halloween customs. Really stupid stuff that only vapid
>>>> morons would worry about.
>>>
>>> https://www.florabelletheband.com/about-6
>>>
>>> The local vapid morons are in a dither about this band. I don't care for
>>> their genre but that's neither here nor there. The original name of the
>>> band was 'War Pony' and the posters had an Indian motif. After much
>>> bitching about cultural appropriation Schulz changed the name to
>>> Florabelle. However she didn't grovel enough to satisfy the morons
>>
>> You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when
>> Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual
>> prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it "his
>> movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't
>> like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard about it.
>> Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more
>> apologies.
>
> For what it's worth, Braveheart is one of the best movies ever made.
> Additionally, the homosexual nature of the prince in that movie is a
> theme stolen in "Those About To Die" on Amazon about the Roman Empire.
> Vespasian's son Domitian is such a faggot that you're just anticipating
> his spontaneous combustion.

I think this was true with the real-life prince character in Braveheart as
well.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 2025-01-07 21:58, DFS wrote:
> On 1/7/2025 2:49 AM, RonB wrote:
>
>> You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when
>> Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual
>> prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it
>> "his
>> movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't
>> like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard
>> about it.
>> Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more
>> apologies.
>
>
> I saw Braveheart in the theater on opening weekend, and when King
> Richard shoved a gayboy (his gay son's lover) out a high window to his
> death, most of the audience - including me - laughed out loud.
>
> The queer "community" was outraged that everyone laughed at that scene.
> But I didn't laugh because he was gay - it happened so fast and he
> screamed on the way down... you have to see it to understand.
>
> Gibson's a masterful movie director who loves bloodletting on screen.
> Apocalypto is one of his best.

I love just about eerything Mel Gibson produced, to be honest. As for
the scene with a faggot, I laughed too. In fact, everyone should because
it is very well done, as it the prince's pathetic response to the death.

--
CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

On 2025-01-08, DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
> On 1/7/2025 2:49 AM, RonB wrote:
>
>> You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when
>> Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual
>> prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it "his
>> movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't
>> like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard about it.
>> Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more
>> apologies.
>
>
> I saw Braveheart in the theater on opening weekend, and when King
> Richard shoved a gayboy (his gay son's lover) out a high window to his
> death, most of the audience - including me - laughed out loud.
>
> The queer "community" was outraged that everyone laughed at that scene.
> But I didn't laugh because he was gay - it happened so fast and he
> screamed on the way down... you have to see it to understand.
>
> Gibson's a masterful movie director who loves bloodletting on screen.
> Apocalypto is one of his best.

Queers for Palestine.
Trannys for Gaza.

Are these people idiots?

They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop.

Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion
of the population but they are very loud vocally.
--
pothead

"Give a man a fish and you turn him into a Democrat for life"
"Teach a man to fish and he might become a self-sufficient conservative Republican"
"Don't underestimate Joe's ability to fuck things up,"
--- Barack H. Obama

pothead wrote:

>Queers for Palestine.
>Trannys for Gaza.
>
>Are these people idiots?
>
>They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop.
>
>Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion
>of the population but they are very loud vocally.

Well, fully half of the population (females) are suppressed by the
Muslims. Yet leftists here support them over the *far* more
enlightened Israelis. Incredible.

On 2025-01-10 08:02, chrisv wrote:
> pothead wrote:
>
>> Queers for Palestine.
>> Trannys for Gaza.
>>
>> Are these people idiots?
>>
>> They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop.
>>
>> Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion
>> of the population but they are very loud vocally.
>
> Well, fully half of the population (females) are suppressed by the
> Muslims. Yet leftists here support them over the *far* more
> enlightened Israelis. Incredible.

The funny part is that the leftists believe they can make allies of
Muslims by convincing them that they are being "oppressed" by the White
man. Muslims have already spent most of their history oppressing the
world all the while complaining that they are being oppressed. As such,
both parties are seeing the other as being a pack of useful idiots.
Leftists are so dumb that they believe that Muslims will conveniently
ignore the fact that everything they are pushing is contrary to Islamic
law like homosexuality, free sex, an empowered woman and a secular
society. Even if these hippies were to become the authority (with the
assumed help of the Muslims), Muslims would either be a constant threat
to their power or would hang every last one of them. Unlike what
happened during Soviet times though, whichever "progressives" aren't
already lying in a pool of their own blood or hanging would be calling
anyone who fears that they are going to be the next to be raped or
killed an islamophobe.

--
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

On 2025-01-10, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> pothead wrote:
>
>>Queers for Palestine.
>>Trannys for Gaza.
>>
>>Are these people idiots?
>>
>>They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop.
>>
>>Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion
>>of the population but they are very loud vocally.
>
> Well, fully half of the population (females) are suppressed by the
> Muslims. Yet leftists here support them over the *far* more
> enlightened Israelis. Incredible.

Enlightened Israelis? They call non-jews "goyim," which means "cattle,"
i.e., "non-human." They also carpet bomb civilians, an illegal, "collective
punishment" tactic.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 2025-01-10, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2025-01-10 08:02, chrisv wrote:
>> pothead wrote:
>>
>>> Queers for Palestine.
>>> Trannys for Gaza.
>>>
>>> Are these people idiots?
>>>
>>> They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop.
>>>
>>> Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion
>>> of the population but they are very loud vocally.
>>
>> Well, fully half of the population (females) are suppressed by the
>> Muslims. Yet leftists here support them over the *far* more
>> enlightened Israelis. Incredible.
>
> The funny part is that the leftists believe they can make allies of
> Muslims by convincing them that they are being "oppressed" by the White
> man. Muslims have already spent most of their history oppressing the
> world all the while complaining that they are being oppressed. As such,
> both parties are seeing the other as being a pack of useful idiots.
> Leftists are so dumb that they believe that Muslims will conveniently
> ignore the fact that everything they are pushing is contrary to Islamic
> law like homosexuality, free sex, an empowered woman and a secular
> society. Even if these hippies were to become the authority (with the
> assumed help of the Muslims), Muslims would either be a constant threat
> to their power or would hang every last one of them. Unlike what
> happened during Soviet times though, whichever "progressives" aren't
> already lying in a pool of their own blood or hanging would be calling
> anyone who fears that they are going to be the next to be raped or
> killed an islamophobe.

The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no good
side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children
(as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of the two sides.

At one point there was a large Christian population in Palestine. The
Muslims aren't the only ones oppressed by the Israeli terrorists.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 2025-01-11 04:22, RonB wrote:
> On 2025-01-10, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2025-01-10 08:02, chrisv wrote:
>>> pothead wrote:
>>>
>>>> Queers for Palestine.
>>>> Trannys for Gaza.
>>>>
>>>> Are these people idiots?
>>>>
>>>> They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop.
>>>>
>>>> Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion
>>>> of the population but they are very loud vocally.
>>>
>>> Well, fully half of the population (females) are suppressed by the
>>> Muslims. Yet leftists here support them over the *far* more
>>> enlightened Israelis. Incredible.
>>
>> The funny part is that the leftists believe they can make allies of
>> Muslims by convincing them that they are being "oppressed" by the White
>> man. Muslims have already spent most of their history oppressing the
>> world all the while complaining that they are being oppressed. As such,
>> both parties are seeing the other as being a pack of useful idiots.
>> Leftists are so dumb that they believe that Muslims will conveniently
>> ignore the fact that everything they are pushing is contrary to Islamic
>> law like homosexuality, free sex, an empowered woman and a secular
>> society. Even if these hippies were to become the authority (with the
>> assumed help of the Muslims), Muslims would either be a constant threat
>> to their power or would hang every last one of them. Unlike what
>> happened during Soviet times though, whichever "progressives" aren't
>> already lying in a pool of their own blood or hanging would be calling
>> anyone who fears that they are going to be the next to be raped or
>> killed an islamophobe.
>
> The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no good
> side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children
> (as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of the two sides.
>
> At one point there was a large Christian population in Palestine. The
> Muslims aren't the only ones oppressed by the Israeli terrorists.

In the conflict between Muslims and Jews, the only side to pick is the
Christians. As I told anyone who's asked me in the past which side I'm
on, one side will spit on me for being a Christian and the other will
behead me.

--
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>On 2025-01-11 04:22, RonB wrote:
>> On 2025-01-10, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-10 08:02, chrisv wrote:
>>>> pothead wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Queers for Palestine.
>>>>> Trannys for Gaza.
>>>>>
>>>>> Are these people idiots?
>>>>>
>>>>> They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop.
>>>>>
>>>>> Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion
>>>>> of the population but they are very loud vocally.
>>>>
>>>> Well, fully half of the population (females) are suppressed by the
>>>> Muslims. Yet leftists here support them over the *far* more
>>>> enlightened Israelis. Incredible.
>>>
>>> The funny part is that the leftists believe they can make allies of
>>> Muslims by convincing them that they are being "oppressed" by the White
>>> man. Muslims have already spent most of their history oppressing the
>>> world all the while complaining that they are being oppressed. As such,
>>> both parties are seeing the other as being a pack of useful idiots.
>>> Leftists are so dumb that they believe that Muslims will conveniently
>>> ignore the fact that everything they are pushing is contrary to Islamic
>>> law like homosexuality, free sex, an empowered woman and a secular
>>> society. Even if these hippies were to become the authority (with the
>>> assumed help of the Muslims), Muslims would either be a constant threat
>>> to their power or would hang every last one of them. Unlike what
>>> happened during Soviet times though, whichever "progressives" aren't
>>> already lying in a pool of their own blood or hanging would be calling
>>> anyone who fears that they are going to be the next to be raped or
>>> killed an islamophobe.
>>
>> The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no good
>> side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children
>> (as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of the two sides.
>>
>> At one point there was a large Christian population in Palestine. The
>> Muslims aren't the only ones oppressed by the Israeli terrorists.
>
>In the conflict between Muslims and Jews, the only side to pick is the
>Christians. As I told anyone who's asked me in the past which side I'm
>on, one side will spit on me for being a Christian and the other will
>behead me.

This unobjective rhetoric from the four of you illustrates quite well
the problem. We can't overcome cultural differences long enough to
have a prayer of mediating the Middle East conflict. And by now it's
just impossible to think about another strategy, the Israelis have
made a basis for regional war that no one could believe is avoidable,
unless Iran has decided to go along with Zionism.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2025-01-11 07:46, Joel wrote:
> CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2025-01-11 04:22, RonB wrote:
>>> On 2025-01-10, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2025-01-10 08:02, chrisv wrote:
>>>>> pothead wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Queers for Palestine.
>>>>>> Trannys for Gaza.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are these people idiots?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion
>>>>>> of the population but they are very loud vocally.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, fully half of the population (females) are suppressed by the
>>>>> Muslims. Yet leftists here support them over the *far* more
>>>>> enlightened Israelis. Incredible.
>>>>
>>>> The funny part is that the leftists believe they can make allies of
>>>> Muslims by convincing them that they are being "oppressed" by the White
>>>> man. Muslims have already spent most of their history oppressing the
>>>> world all the while complaining that they are being oppressed. As such,
>>>> both parties are seeing the other as being a pack of useful idiots.
>>>> Leftists are so dumb that they believe that Muslims will conveniently
>>>> ignore the fact that everything they are pushing is contrary to Islamic
>>>> law like homosexuality, free sex, an empowered woman and a secular
>>>> society. Even if these hippies were to become the authority (with the
>>>> assumed help of the Muslims), Muslims would either be a constant threat
>>>> to their power or would hang every last one of them. Unlike what
>>>> happened during Soviet times though, whichever "progressives" aren't
>>>> already lying in a pool of their own blood or hanging would be calling
>>>> anyone who fears that they are going to be the next to be raped or
>>>> killed an islamophobe.
>>>
>>> The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no good
>>> side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children
>>> (as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of the two sides.
>>>
>>> At one point there was a large Christian population in Palestine. The
>>> Muslims aren't the only ones oppressed by the Israeli terrorists.
>>
>> In the conflict between Muslims and Jews, the only side to pick is the
>> Christians. As I told anyone who's asked me in the past which side I'm
>> on, one side will spit on me for being a Christian and the other will
>> behead me.
>
>
> This unobjective rhetoric from the four of you illustrates quite well
> the problem. We can't overcome cultural differences long enough to
> have a prayer of mediating the Middle East conflict. And by now it's
> just impossible to think about another strategy, the Israelis have
> made a basis for regional war that no one could believe is avoidable,
> unless Iran has decided to go along with Zionism.

If I ran a powerful country like the United States, here is what I do to
respond to the conflict in the Middle East:

- Give no money whatsoever to Israel
- Give no support whatsoever to Palestine
- Violently put down any protest by either side on American soil

--
CrudeSausage
Gab: @CrudeSausage
Unapologetic paleoconservative

RonB wrote:

>The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no good
>side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children
>(as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of the two sides.
>
>At one point there was a large Christian population in Palestine. The
>Muslims aren't the only ones oppressed by the Israeli terrorists.

What is going on over there is horrible, but we should not forget that
Hamas intentionally uses civilians as shields. We also should not
forget that Hamas would happily slaughter *every last jew* if they had
the ability.