On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 13:59:26 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:

>
> You must have a monitor, no? Where is that? On that same small table?
>

No. My machine designs are thoroughly unconventional.

The "small table" is actually a kind of rack that contains 2 motherboards
and the associated disk drives plus powerful cooling fans (nothing like
the piddly vendor supplied junk fans).

On a separate desk-table I have my monitors and keyboard/mice.
They are all attached to the motherboards by 10 foot cables.
This desk-table is about 10 feet in length and I can easily slide
between the 2 monitors/keyboards/mice with a task chair.

I may, if I am in the mood, take a digital photo of this setup.
It would make the lackeys drool with envy.

--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
>On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 13:59:26 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
>> You must have a monitor, no? Where is that? On that same small table?
>
>No. My machine designs are thoroughly unconventional.
>
>The "small table" is actually a kind of rack that contains 2 motherboards
>and the associated disk drives plus powerful cooling fans (nothing like
>the piddly vendor supplied junk fans).
>
>On a separate desk-table I have my monitors and keyboard/mice.
>They are all attached to the motherboards by 10 foot cables.
>This desk-table is about 10 feet in length and I can easily slide
>between the 2 monitors/keyboards/mice with a task chair.
>
>I may, if I am in the mood, take a digital photo of this setup.
>It would make the lackeys drool with envy.

It sounds like chaos, disorder, un-neatness. You're a nut. My
computer is cool as fuck.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 12/14/2024 12:56 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
> Le 2024-12-14 à 10:40, DFS a écrit :
>> On 12/14/2024 9:22 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
>>
>>> my wife's career is inevitably tied to having proper access to the
>>> downtown core.
>>
>>
>> Why does OnlyFans require being downtown?
>
> I'm happy you find my wife so beautiful to believe that she has an
> OnlyFans account.

Simps pay big, big money to some of those girls. Some of them make
millions per year.

I don't recall if I saw a pic of your hawt wife, but I did see a couple
of you. One sitting at a table at a wedding/party, and one holding your
son up over your head (as I recall you were wearing a mohawk).