On 2024-11-28, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> On 11/28/24 10:32 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>> pothead wrote:
>>>> Wrong, they have denied abortions where it was medically indicated,
>>>> hence lawsuits, "good" person.
>>>>
>>> Well each case will be different however in GENERAL, I disagree with
>>> that.
>>>
>>
>> And you want biased DAs to decide what is different.
>>
>
> And those DA's have been enabled by deliberately vague legislation.
>
> -hh

I am 100% against DAs making those kinds of decisions.
The final decision should be made by medical professionals.
However there have to be some type of reasonable legislation to
act as guardrails.
And it should be left up to the states and thus the voters to decide.
It's impossible to 100% please everyone so reasonable choices need to
be made as mandated by the people of the state.

--
pothead

"Ding Dong The Witch Is Gone"
"Which Old Witch?"
"The Kamala Harris Witch. Of Course!"

-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>On 11/28/24 10:32 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>> pothead wrote:
>
>>>> Wrong, they have denied abortions where it was medically indicated,
>>>> hence lawsuits, "good" person.
>>>>
>>> Well each case will be different however in GENERAL, I disagree with
>>> that.
>>
>> And you want biased DAs to decide what is different.
>
>And those DA's have been enabled by deliberately vague legislation.

Exactly, they want law to be medicine, they fucked up, they will get
sued.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>And it should be left up to the states and thus the voters to decide.

Read my sig.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

pothead wrote:
> On 2024-11-28, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>> On 11/28/24 10:32 AM, Siri Cruise wrote:
>>> pothead wrote:
>>>>> Wrong, they have denied abortions where it was medically indicated,
>>>>> hence lawsuits, "good" person.
>>>>>
>>>> Well each case will be different however in GENERAL, I disagree with
>>>> that.
>>>>
>>>
>>> And you want biased DAs to decide what is different.
>>>
>>
>> And those DA's have been enabled by deliberately vague legislation.
>>
>> -hh
>
> I am 100% against DAs making those kinds of decisions.

But you are okay with these laws.

> The final decision should be made by medical professionals.

It ain't. What law do you suggest?

> However there have to be some type of reasonable legislation to
> act as guardrails.

With biased DAs as guardrails.

And you approve.

> And it should be left up to the states and thus the voters to decide.

And Republicans prevent voting.

> It's impossible to 100% please everyone so reasonable choices need to
> be made as mandated by the people of the state.

https://osg.ca.gov/reprorights/

It really pisses you off raped children in Fresno cannot be forced
to carry the baby to term.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:

>It really pisses you off raped children in Fresno cannot be forced
>to carry the baby to term.

"If the shoe fits ..."

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-11-28, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>> On 2024-11-28, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>On 2024-11-27, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>>> max headroom wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
>>>>>> In news:vi77o6$1a33$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
>>>>>> typed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Children, especially in the San Joaquin Valley, are injured by
>>>>>>> pollution. Our children are not to be sacrificed to Molech and Mammon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, California banned abortion?
>>>>>
>>>>> Abortion (and miscarriage) affect emryos and non-viable fetuses.
>>>>>
>>>>> They aren't children until they are out of the womb.
>>>>
>>>>So a baby in the womb pressing a foot into the mother which shows up outside
>>>>on her baby bump isn't a living human?
>>>>
>>>>Yet bacteria found on Mars is considered life.
>>>>
>>>>You are sick.
>>>
>>> It's "sick" to prioritize a fetus at *any* stage over its mother. That
>>> is what antiabortion states have done, e.g. Texas. They are civilly
>>> and potentially criminally liable.
>>>
>>I never said that.
>>FWIW if the mother's life is in danger, the mother comes first.
>
>
> That's weasel words, though, that's exactly how they've carried out
> these sadistic denials of abortions, that my sig has warned them
> they're gonna be held liable for. "Her life wasn't in danger [yet]."
> Nope, redneck psycho, you tortured someone in the worst way possible,
> you will be sued. Fuck Texas.
>
So you are in favor of killing babies.
Got it.
I'll add it to your ever growing list of "good traits".

--
pothead

"Ding Dong The Witch Is Gone"
"Which Old Witch?"
"The Kamala Harris Witch. Of Course!"

pothead wrote:
> On 2024-11-28, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>> On 2024-11-28, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-11-27, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>>>> max headroom wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
>>>>>>> In news:vi77o6$1a33$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
>>>>>>> typed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Children, especially in the San Joaquin Valley, are injured by
>>>>>>>> pollution. Our children are not to be sacrificed to Molech and Mammon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oh, California banned abortion?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Abortion (and miscarriage) affect emryos and non-viable fetuses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They aren't children until they are out of the womb.
>>>>>
>>>>> So a baby in the womb pressing a foot into the mother which shows up outside
>>>>> on her baby bump isn't a living human?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yet bacteria found on Mars is considered life.
>>>>>
>>>>> You are sick.
>>>>
>>>> It's "sick" to prioritize a fetus at *any* stage over its mother. That
>>>> is what antiabortion states have done, e.g. Texas. They are civilly
>>>> and potentially criminally liable.
>>>>
>>> I never said that.
>>> FWIW if the mother's life is in danger, the mother comes first.
>>
>>
>> That's weasel words, though, that's exactly how they've carried out
>> these sadistic denials of abortions, that my sig has warned them
>> they're gonna be held liable for. "Her life wasn't in danger [yet]."
>> Nope, redneck psycho, you tortured someone in the worst way possible,
>> you will be sued. Fuck Texas.
>>
> So you are in favor of killing babies.
> Got it.
> I'll add it to your ever growing list of "good traits".
>

Show us yor proposed law.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

On 2024-11-28, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
> pothead wrote:
>> On 2024-11-28, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-11-28, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-11-27, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>>>>>> max headroom wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
>>>>>>>> In news:vi77o6$1a33$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>> typed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Children, especially in the San Joaquin Valley, are injured by
>>>>>>>>> pollution. Our children are not to be sacrificed to Molech and Mammon.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oh, California banned abortion?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Abortion (and miscarriage) affect emryos and non-viable fetuses.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They aren't children until they are out of the womb.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So a baby in the womb pressing a foot into the mother which shows up outside
>>>>>> on her baby bump isn't a living human?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yet bacteria found on Mars is considered life.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are sick.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's "sick" to prioritize a fetus at *any* stage over its mother. That
>>>>> is what antiabortion states have done, e.g. Texas. They are civilly
>>>>> and potentially criminally liable.
>>>>>
>>>> I never said that.
>>>> FWIW if the mother's life is in danger, the mother comes first.
>>>
>>>
>>> That's weasel words, though, that's exactly how they've carried out
>>> these sadistic denials of abortions, that my sig has warned them
>>> they're gonna be held liable for. "Her life wasn't in danger [yet]."
>>> Nope, redneck psycho, you tortured someone in the worst way possible,
>>> you will be sued. Fuck Texas.
>>>
>> So you are in favor of killing babies.
>> Got it.
>> I'll add it to your ever growing list of "good traits".
>>
>
> Show us yor proposed law.

I'm not a legislator however if a doctor considers a woman's life to
be in mortal danger, whatever needs to be done should be done.
And in some cases, not a dire emergency though, maybe a second
opinion would be needed.
It's complex.

And this should all be documented in order to weed out doctors who
might be fraudulently performing procedures even when the mother's
life is NOT in danger.
Patterns will emerge.

--
pothead

"Ding Dong The Witch Is Gone"
"Which Old Witch?"
"The Kamala Harris Witch. Of Course!"

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>>>FWIW if the mother's life is in danger, the mother comes first.
>>
>> That's weasel words, though, that's exactly how they've carried out
>> these sadistic denials of abortions, that my sig has warned them
>> they're gonna be held liable for. "Her life wasn't in danger [yet]."
>> Nope, redneck psycho, you tortured someone in the worst way possible,
>> you will be sued. Fuck Texas.
>>
>So you are in favor of killing babies.
>Got it.
>I'll add it to your ever growing list of "good traits".

Wrong, they have denied abortions where it was medically indicated,
hence lawsuits, "good" person.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 2024-11-28, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
>>>>FWIW if the mother's life is in danger, the mother comes first.
>>>
>>> That's weasel words, though, that's exactly how they've carried out
>>> these sadistic denials of abortions, that my sig has warned them
>>> they're gonna be held liable for. "Her life wasn't in danger [yet]."
>>> Nope, redneck psycho, you tortured someone in the worst way possible,
>>> you will be sued. Fuck Texas.
>>>
>>So you are in favor of killing babies.
>>Got it.
>>I'll add it to your ever growing list of "good traits".
>
>
> Wrong, they have denied abortions where it was medically indicated,
> hence lawsuits, "good" person.
>
Well each case will be different however in GENERAL, I disagree with that.

--
pothead

"Ding Dong The Witch Is Gone"
"Which Old Witch?"
"The Kamala Harris Witch. Of Course!"

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>>>>>FWIW if the mother's life is in danger, the mother comes first.
>>>>
>>>> That's weasel words, though, that's exactly how they've carried out
>>>> these sadistic denials of abortions, that my sig has warned them
>>>> they're gonna be held liable for. "Her life wasn't in danger [yet]."
>>>> Nope, redneck psycho, you tortured someone in the worst way possible,
>>>> you will be sued. Fuck Texas.
>>>>
>>>So you are in favor of killing babies.
>>>Got it.
>>>I'll add it to your ever growing list of "good traits".
>>
>> Wrong, they have denied abortions where it was medically indicated,
>> hence lawsuits, "good" person.
>>
>Well each case will be different however in GENERAL, I disagree with that.

If they simply let doctors be doctors, we wouldn't have this problem.
"Pro-life" is pro-women-having-sepsis-and-maybe-dying. It's farcical,
and tragic. They will be sued.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

pothead wrote:
> I'm not a legislator however if a doctor considers a woman's life to
> be in mortal danger, whatever needs to be done should be done.

The existing laws let DAs second guess the doctor and after the
fact decide what really needs be done.

You elect legislators. That makes you share responsibility for the
laws they write. We can bypass the legislature and take full
responsibility.

> And in some cases, not a dire emergency though, maybe a second
> opinion would be needed.
> It's complex.

The second opinion will be an antiabortion DA. The DA can force a
doctor into an expensive and risky trial for saving a woman's life.

> And this should all be documented in order to weed out doctors who
> might be fraudulently performing procedures even when the mother's
> life is NOT in danger.

After the fact you let biased prosecutor decide who was in danger.

> Patterns will emerge.

The pattern has emerged: women die because you demand doctors be
harassed and prosecuted.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

[Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:

======================================
Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
Pathetic vandalism of follow ups in an impotent attempt
to stop being bitch-slapped into next week
repaired and restored.
======================================

>A zygote and a fetus are not
>"babies." No "baby" is killed in an abortion.

Yes, a fetus is a baby, "Cunt Flaps."

Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> [Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:
>
> ======================================
> Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
> Pathetic vandalism of follow ups in an impotent attempt
> to stop being bitch-slapped into next week
> repaired and restored.
> ======================================

> Yes, a fetus is a baby, "Cunt Flaps."

Irrelevant. The law uses the objective term fetus.

I say baby but I have no problem translating between my idiolect
and legal language.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

In news:viauao$ogf8$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
typed:

> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> [Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:

>> ======================================
>> Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
>> Pathetic vandalism of follow ups in an impotent attempt
>> to stop being bitch-slapped into next week
>> repaired and restored.
>> ======================================

>> Yes, a fetus is a baby, "Cunt Flaps."

> Irrelevant. The law uses the objective term fetus.

Do you recognize no law higher than man's?

In news:via5f6$k1mm$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
typed:

> pothead wrote:

>> And it should be left up to the states and thus the voters to decide.

> And Republicans prevent voting....

Specify.

max headroom wrote:
> In news:viauao$ogf8$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
> typed:
>
>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> [Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:
>
>>> ======================================
>>> Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
>>> Pathetic vandalism of follow ups in an impotent attempt
>>> to stop being bitch-slapped into next week
>>> repaired and restored.
>>> ======================================
>
>>> Yes, a fetus is a baby, "Cunt Flaps."
>
>> Irrelevant. The law uses the objective term fetus.
>
> Do you recognize no law higher than man's?
>
>

Mosaic law does not outlaw abortion. It allows abortions in cases
of adultery.

What other law?

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

max headroom wrote:
> In news:via5f6$k1mm$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
> typed:
>
>> pothead wrote:
>
>>> And it should be left up to the states and thus the voters to decide.
>
>> And Republicans prevent voting....
>
> Specify.
>
>

You are the one being harm. It seems you are one of those people
who enjoys whips and chains.

Different strokes for different folks.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

In news:vibnst$vm4g$3@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
typed:

> max headroom wrote:
>> In news:via5f6$k1mm$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
>> typed:
>>> pothead wrote:

>>>> And it should be left up to the states and thus the voters to decide.

>>> And Republicans prevent voting....

>> Specify.

> You are the one being harm. It seems you are one of those people
> who enjoys whips and chains.

> Different strokes for different folks.

Non sequitur. Please specify where and when Republicans prevented voting.

In news:vibnq3$vm4g$2@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
typed:

> max headroom wrote:
>> In news:viauao$ogf8$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
>> typed:
>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>> [Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:

>>>> ======================================
>>>> Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
>>>> Pathetic vandalism of follow ups in an impotent attempt
>>>> to stop being bitch-slapped into next week
>>>> repaired and restored.
>>>> ======================================

>>>> Yes, a fetus is a baby, "Cunt Flaps."

>>> Irrelevant. The law uses the objective term fetus.

>> Do you recognize no law higher than man's?

> Mosaic law does not outlaw abortion. It allows abortions in cases
> of adultery.

Is that the law in California that you support?

max headroom wrote:
> In news:vibnq3$vm4g$2@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
> typed:
>
>> max headroom wrote:
>>> In news:viauao$ogf8$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
>>> typed:
>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>> [Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:
>
>>>>> ======================================
>>>>> Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
>>>>> Pathetic vandalism of follow ups in an impotent attempt
>>>>> to stop being bitch-slapped into next week
>>>>> repaired and restored.
>>>>> ======================================
>
>>>>> Yes, a fetus is a baby, "Cunt Flaps."
>
>>>> Irrelevant. The law uses the objective term fetus.
>
>>> Do you recognize no law higher than man's?
>
>> Mosaic law does not outlaw abortion. It allows abortions in cases
>> of adultery.
>
> Is that the law in California that you support?

How is California different man's law?

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

max headroom wrote:
> In news:vibnst$vm4g$3@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
> typed:
>
>> max headroom wrote:
>>> In news:via5f6$k1mm$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
>>> typed:
>>>> pothead wrote:
>
>>>>> And it should be left up to the states and thus the voters to decide.
>
>>>> And Republicans prevent voting....
>
>>> Specify.
>
>> You are the one being harm. It seems you are one of those people
>> who enjoys whips and chains.
>
>> Different strokes for different folks.
>
> Non sequitur. Please specify where and when Republicans prevented voting.
>
>

We do not let them. Why you do is your problem.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

NoBody wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 22:44:48 -0800, Siri Cruise
> <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> max headroom wrote:
>>> In news:via5f6$k1mm$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
>>> typed:
>>>
>>>> pothead wrote:
>>>
>>>>> And it should be left up to the states and thus the voters to decide.
>>>
>>>> And Republicans prevent voting....
>>>
>>> Specify.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You are the one being harm. It seems you are one of those people
>> who enjoys whips and chains.
>>
>> Different strokes for different folks.
>
> And the drunk has no useful answer.
>

Your republicans, your state.

You are not damned. You stay in hell by your own choice. You are
as free as Peter was.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

In news:vibpsv$100g5$3@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
typed:

> max headroom wrote:
>> In news:vibnst$vm4g$3@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
>> typed:
>>> max headroom wrote:
>>>> In news:via5f6$k1mm$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
>>>> typed:
>>>>> pothead wrote:

>>>>>> And it should be left up to the states and thus the voters to decide.

>>>>> And Republicans prevent voting....

>>>> Specify.

>>> You are the one being harm. It seems you are one of those people
>>> who enjoys whips and chains.

>>> Different strokes for different folks.

>> Non sequitur. Please specify where and when Republicans prevented voting.

> We do not let them. Why you do is your problem.

So you lied again.

In news:vibpqm$100g5$2@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
typed:

> max headroom wrote:
>> In news:vibnq3$vm4g$2@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
>> typed:
>>> max headroom wrote:
>>>> In news:viauao$ogf8$1@dont-email.me, Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com>
>>>> typed:
>>>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>> [Default] Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza typed:

>>>>>> ======================================
>>>>>> Rudy "Cunt Flaps" Canoza
>>>>>> Pathetic vandalism of follow ups in an impotent attempt
>>>>>> to stop being bitch-slapped into next week
>>>>>> repaired and restored.
>>>>>> ======================================

>>>>>> Yes, a fetus is a baby, "Cunt Flaps."

>>>>> Irrelevant. The law uses the objective term fetus.

>>>> Do you recognize no law higher than man's?

>>> Mosaic law does not outlaw abortion. It allows abortions in cases
>>> of adultery.

>> Is that the law in California that you support?

> How is California different man's law?

You tell us... in English.