All the fucking distros are adopting Wayland and their stupid-fuck
lackeys will agree without question or dissent.

But Wayland is garbage.

Also, X Window will be around for a long, long, time.

Only a retarded idiot would ever agree to Wayland.

Fuck Wayland!

Fuck WAyland!

I will use X Window now and in the future.

--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote at 17:51 this Sunday (GMT):
> All the fucking distros are adopting Wayland and their stupid-fuck
> lackeys will agree without question or dissent.
>
> But Wayland is garbage.
>
> Also, X Window will be around for a long, long, time.
>
> Only a retarded idiot would ever agree to Wayland.
>
> Fuck Wayland!
>
> Fuck WAyland!
>
> I will use X Window now and in the future.

While I wouldn't say Wayland is "garbage", I don't really like how it
would break a lot of my apps. For now, I'll be sticking with Wayland
until X11 backwards compatibility is implemented.

Also I don't think XFCE4 has a Wayland version.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:30:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:

>
> While I wouldn't say Wayland is "garbage", I don't really like how it
> would break a lot of my apps. For now, I'll be sticking with Wayland
> until X11 backwards compatibility is implemented.
>

Do you believe that those clowns at freedesktop.org give a damn
about backward compatibility?

Talk to them about backward compatibility and they'll laugh in
your face and accuse you of being anti-progressive and stuck
in the past.

They will easily toss 50 years of software development onto
the trash heap and their mainstream distro flunkies will
accept it all without protest.

--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:30:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
>> While I wouldn't say Wayland is "garbage", I don't really like how it
>> would break a lot of my apps. For now, I'll be sticking with Wayland
>> until X11 backwards compatibility is implemented.
>
>Do you believe that those clowns at freedesktop.org give a damn
>about backward compatibility?
>
>Talk to them about backward compatibility and they'll laugh in
>your face and accuse you of being anti-progressive and stuck
>in the past.
>
>They will easily toss 50 years of software development onto
>the trash heap and their mainstream distro flunkies will
>accept it all without protest.

You ever think of simply choosing a distro that uses X? Your
arguments are always designed to defend having a joke of a setup, your
system would suck balls with any graphical scheme.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Le 11-11-2024, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:30:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
>>
>> While I wouldn't say Wayland is "garbage", I don't really like how it
>> would break a lot of my apps. For now, I'll be sticking with Wayland
>> until X11 backwards compatibility is implemented.
>>
>
> Do you believe that those clowns at freedesktop.org give a damn
> about backward compatibility?

Yes. It's called xwayland.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

Le 11-11-2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
>>On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:30:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>>
>>> While I wouldn't say Wayland is "garbage", I don't really like how it
>>> would break a lot of my apps. For now, I'll be sticking with Wayland
>>> until X11 backwards compatibility is implemented.
>>
>>Do you believe that those clowns at freedesktop.org give a damn
>>about backward compatibility?
>>
>>Talk to them about backward compatibility and they'll laugh in
>>your face and accuse you of being anti-progressive and stuck
>>in the past.
>>
>>They will easily toss 50 years of software development onto
>>the trash heap and their mainstream distro flunkies will
>>accept it all without protest.
>
>
> You ever think

No, he can't. That's obvious in any of his messages.

> of simply choosing a distro that uses X?

You mean installing something not installed by default by his distro?
No, he's a distro lackey.

> Your
> arguments are always designed to defend having a joke of a setup, your
> system would suck balls with any graphical scheme.

There is nothing wrong with his system. The issue is with his way of
using it. He claims he's the best user when he's so slow that he
shouldn't brag about it. And the fact that he's relying heavily on a GUI
when he says that GUI are stupid is an issue too.

But its look is only a matter of taste. If it looks ugly to you, he is
the one to use it, so he has no reason to adapt it to your tastes. To
speak about something you'll understand, his way of choosing a theme for
his GUI is as valid as your way of choosing a partner with a dick. If
you claim about your right to have different tastes, you can't criticise
his tastes.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
>Le 11-11-2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> a écrit :
>> Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
>>>On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:30:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>>>
>>>> While I wouldn't say Wayland is "garbage", I don't really like how it
>>>> would break a lot of my apps. For now, I'll be sticking with Wayland
>>>> until X11 backwards compatibility is implemented.
>>>
>>>Do you believe that those clowns at freedesktop.org give a damn
>>>about backward compatibility?
>>>
>>>Talk to them about backward compatibility and they'll laugh in
>>>your face and accuse you of being anti-progressive and stuck
>>>in the past.
>>>
>>>They will easily toss 50 years of software development onto
>>>the trash heap and their mainstream distro flunkies will
>>>accept it all without protest.
>>
>> You ever think
>
>No, he can't. That's obvious in any of his messages.
>
>> of simply choosing a distro that uses X?
>
>You mean installing something not installed by default by his distro?
>No, he's a distro lackey.

AFAICT, my Debian uses X by default. I see nothing about Wayland.
Larry apparently thinks all distros are alike, which he's partially
right about, they're all superior to his ridiculous, lacking a modern
browser, no DE, retardo setup.

>> Your
>> arguments are always designed to defend having a joke of a setup, your
>> system would suck balls with any graphical scheme.
>
>There is nothing wrong with his system. The issue is with his way of
>using it. He claims he's the best user when he's so slow that he
>shouldn't brag about it. And the fact that he's relying heavily on a GUI
>when he says that GUI are stupid is an issue too.
>
>But its look is only a matter of taste. If it looks ugly to you, he is
>the one to use it, so he has no reason to adapt it to your tastes. To
>speak about something you'll understand, his way of choosing a theme for
>his GUI is as valid as your way of choosing a partner with a dick. If
>you claim about your right to have different tastes, you can't criticise
>his tastes.

I am not sure I'd compare his silly computer to sexual preferences ...

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

>> Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:

Weren't you the one who cautioned us about responding to trolls?

Anyway, my setups (Debian, Ubuntu, and Arch) all run Xorg at the moment.

I'm a proud distro lackey :-D

Ha ha ha, good old "Bitter Bierce". How we ended up with Trump, again:

--
In our civilization, and under our republican form of government, intelligence
is so highly honored that it is rewarded by exemption from the cares of office.
-- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"

Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

> Le 11-11-2024, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :
>> On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:30:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>>
>>> While I wouldn't say Wayland is "garbage", I don't really like how it
>>> would break a lot of my apps. For now, I'll be sticking with Wayland
>>> until X11 backwards compatibility is implemented.
>>
>> Do you believe that those clowns at freedesktop.org give a damn
>> about backward compatibility?
>
> Yes. It's called xwayland.

% apropos xwayland
Xwayland (1) - an X server for running X clients under Wayland.

--
<Knghtbrd> glDisable (GL_BUGS);
<Endy> heh
<Endy> Is that in 1.2? :)

Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote at 10:42 this Monday (GMT):
> Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
>>Le 11-11-2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>> Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
>>>>On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:30:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> While I wouldn't say Wayland is "garbage", I don't really like how it
>>>>> would break a lot of my apps. For now, I'll be sticking with Wayland
>>>>> until X11 backwards compatibility is implemented.
>>>>
>>>>Do you believe that those clowns at freedesktop.org give a damn
>>>>about backward compatibility?
>>>>
>>>>Talk to them about backward compatibility and they'll laugh in
>>>>your face and accuse you of being anti-progressive and stuck
>>>>in the past.
>>>>
>>>>They will easily toss 50 years of software development onto
>>>>the trash heap and their mainstream distro flunkies will
>>>>accept it all without protest.
>>>
>>> You ever think
>>
>>No, he can't. That's obvious in any of his messages.
>>
>>> of simply choosing a distro that uses X?
>>
>>You mean installing something not installed by default by his distro?
>>No, he's a distro lackey.
>
>
> AFAICT, my Debian uses X by default. I see nothing about Wayland.
> Larry apparently thinks all distros are alike, which he's partially
> right about, they're all superior to his ridiculous, lacking a modern
> browser, no DE, retardo setup.
>
>
>>> Your
>>> arguments are always designed to defend having a joke of a setup, your
>>> system would suck balls with any graphical scheme.
>>
>>There is nothing wrong with his system. The issue is with his way of
>>using it. He claims he's the best user when he's so slow that he
>>shouldn't brag about it. And the fact that he's relying heavily on a GUI
>>when he says that GUI are stupid is an issue too.
>>
>>But its look is only a matter of taste. If it looks ugly to you, he is
>>the one to use it, so he has no reason to adapt it to your tastes. To
>>speak about something you'll understand, his way of choosing a theme for
>>his GUI is as valid as your way of choosing a partner with a dick. If
>>you claim about your right to have different tastes, you can't criticise
>>his tastes.
>
>
> I am not sure I'd compare his silly computer to sexual preferences ...

My debian install is running X11, too.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
wrote:

>> AFAICT, my Debian uses X by default. I see nothing about Wayland.
>> Larry apparently thinks all distros are alike, which he's partially
>> right about, they're all superior to his ridiculous, lacking a modern
>> browser, no DE, retardo setup.
>
>My debian install is running X11, too.

I was pretty sure, yeah, I looked as carefully as possible, although
it wasn't entirely clear at first.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 11 Nov 2024 10:11:08 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

>>
>> Do you believe that those clowns at freedesktop.org give a damn
>> about backward compatibility?
>
> Yes. It's called xwayland.

You are a dunce.

Xwayland is NOT a complete backward compatibility library. It only
allows certain X applications to run.

For one thing, the ffmpeg "x11grab" does not work with xwayland.

Also, all X compositing window managers will not function with xwayland
as they violate a key concept of Wayland. Thus, 50 years of venerable
X window managers which many people use will be tossed on the scrap
heap.

YOU, like Wayland, are full of fucking shit,

On 11/10/24 12:51, Farley Flud wrote:
> All the fucking distros are adopting Wayland and their stupid-fuck
> lackeys will agree without question or dissent.
>
> But Wayland is garbage.
>
> Also, X Window will be around for a long, long, time.
>
> Only a retarded idiot would ever agree to Wayland.
>
> Fuck Wayland!
>
> Fuck WAyland!
>
> I will use X Window now and in the future.

At a minimum I would want to preserve it, as much as possible, in
parallel, much like in the case of inits. Linux being about specificity
and choices we should always and automatically deny monopoly to any
scumbag salivating for it!

On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 05:42:47 -0500, Joel wrote:

> AFAICT, my Debian uses X by default.

I choose what GUI to run at login time. Linux gives you a choice that way.

Le 11-11-2024, Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> a écrit :
> On 11 Nov 2024 10:11:08 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>
>>>
>>> Do you believe that those clowns at freedesktop.org give a damn
>>> about backward compatibility?
>>
>> Yes. It's called xwayland.
>
> You are a dunce.

Goooood. You can use a new word.

> Xwayland is NOT a complete backward compatibility library. It only
> allows certain X applications to run.

Yes, and wayland provide alternatives for applications who can't run
under xwayland.

> For one thing, the ffmpeg "x11grab" does not work with xwayland.

So, either use something else or fix it. As you can't, the issue isn't
Wayland, the issue is you. And you know what? That won't stop anyone to
sleep.

> YOU, like Wayland, are full of fucking shit,

I'll tell you a secret. I'm not the one unable to do what I want with my
computer. You are.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

On 17 Nov 2024 09:36:19 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

>
> I'll tell you a secret. I'm not the one unable to do what I want with my
> computer. You are.
>

I have another secret.

YOU do very little with your computer. That's why you
can easily get by with that wayland crap.

In contrast, _I_ am involved in ALL forms of digital
computation: audio, visual, textual, scientific, mathematical,
etc., etc., etc.

I accomplish more in a single day than you do in a whole year.

--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

Le 17-11-2024, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :
> On 17 Nov 2024 09:36:19 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>>
>> I'll tell you a secret. I'm not the one unable to do what I want with my
>> computer. You are.
>>
>
> I have another secret.

I'm ready.

> YOU do very little with your computer. That's why you
> can easily get by with that wayland crap.

Unlike you, I know what I do with my computer. So you'll have to try
something else to impress me.

> In contrast, _I_ am involved in ALL forms of digital
> computation: audio, visual, textual, scientific, mathematical,
> etc., etc., etc.

That's not what your videos show. And everything you say in your
messages prove you have no idea about anything which require technical
knowledge. So if you are involved, either others ignore you or you are
pissing others off. Being involved without understanding is useless like
everything you can dream of doing.

> I accomplish more in a single day than you do in a whole year.

In your dreams, probably. But you don't need a computer for that. You
only need a bed in your asylum.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote at 11:21 this Sunday (GMT):
> On 17 Nov 2024 09:36:19 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>>
>> I'll tell you a secret. I'm not the one unable to do what I want with my
>> computer. You are.
>>
>
> I have another secret.
>
> YOU do very little with your computer. That's why you
> can easily get by with that wayland crap.
>
> In contrast, _I_ am involved in ALL forms of digital
> computation: audio, visual, textual, scientific, mathematical,
> etc., etc., etc.
>
> I accomplish more in a single day than you do in a whole year.

Oh cool, what have you done?
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

On 11/18/2024 9:40 AM, candycanearter07 wrote:
> Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote at 11:21 this Sunday (GMT):
>> On 17 Nov 2024 09:36:19 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I'll tell you a secret. I'm not the one unable to do what I want with my
>>> computer. You are.
>>>
>>
>> I have another secret.
>>
>> YOU do very little with your computer. That's why you
>> can easily get by with that wayland crap.
>>
>> In contrast, _I_ am involved in ALL forms of digital
>> computation: audio, visual, textual, scientific, mathematical,
>> etc., etc., etc.
>>
>> I accomplish more in a single day than you do in a whole year.
>
>
> Oh cool, what have you done?

Feeb has left the building.

He always runs when asked for proof of his outlandish boasting.

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>On 11/18/2024 9:40 AM, candycanearter07 wrote:
>> Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote at 11:21 this Sunday (GMT):
>>> On 17 Nov 2024 09:36:19 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'll tell you a secret. I'm not the one unable to do what I want with my
>>>> computer. You are.
>>>
>>> I have another secret.
>>>
>>> YOU do very little with your computer. That's why you
>>> can easily get by with that wayland crap.
>>>
>>> In contrast, _I_ am involved in ALL forms of digital
>>> computation: audio, visual, textual, scientific, mathematical,
>>> etc., etc., etc.
>>>
>>> I accomplish more in a single day than you do in a whole year.
>>
>> Oh cool, what have you done?
>
>Feeb has left the building.
>
>He always runs when asked for proof of his outlandish boasting.

That's because Stéphane and candycanearter07 are both superior Linux
users and posters, to him, he's a joke. The laughingstock of the
group. I'd rather have your Winblows setup, than his idiotic computer
system.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On 11/21/2024 12:35 PM, Joel wrote:
> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>> On 11/18/2024 9:40 AM, candycanearter07 wrote:
>>> Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote at 11:21 this Sunday (GMT):
>>>> On 17 Nov 2024 09:36:19 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'll tell you a secret. I'm not the one unable to do what I want with my
>>>>> computer. You are.
>>>>
>>>> I have another secret.
>>>>
>>>> YOU do very little with your computer. That's why you
>>>> can easily get by with that wayland crap.
>>>>
>>>> In contrast, _I_ am involved in ALL forms of digital
>>>> computation: audio, visual, textual, scientific, mathematical,
>>>> etc., etc., etc.
>>>>
>>>> I accomplish more in a single day than you do in a whole year.
>>>
>>> Oh cool, what have you done?
>>
>> Feeb has left the building.
>>
>> He always runs when asked for proof of his outlandish boasting.
>
>
> That's because Stéphane and candycanearter07 are both superior Linux
> users and posters, to him, he's a joke. The laughingstock of the
> group. I'd rather have your Winblows setup, than his idiotic computer
> system.

At one point I had a Linux setup that looked kind of like his. I was
running Openbox on Manjaro. You had to right-click on the blank screen
to bring up a menu.

On that system, the login screen and desktop you see were actually a
separate graphical login manager (SLiM), window manager (Openbox),
compositing mgr (compton), panel (tint2panel), right-click menu (Obmenu
generator using xml) and wallpaper setter (Nitrogen using .png or .jpg).
Each piece was installed and launched separately.

It was fast, but kind of silly to use. After you installed an app, you
had to manually run a separate program to force the new app to show up
in the right-click menu. Or you could open some text file and add it
manually.

That's the kind of crap Feeb does 12 hours a day, when he's not busy
doing Nobel-level scientific research.

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>On 11/21/2024 12:35 PM, Joel wrote:
>> DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>>> On 11/18/2024 9:40 AM, candycanearter07 wrote:
>>>> Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote at 11:21 this Sunday (GMT):
>>>>> On 17 Nov 2024 09:36:19 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll tell you a secret. I'm not the one unable to do what I want with my
>>>>>> computer. You are.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have another secret.
>>>>>
>>>>> YOU do very little with your computer. That's why you
>>>>> can easily get by with that wayland crap.
>>>>>
>>>>> In contrast, _I_ am involved in ALL forms of digital
>>>>> computation: audio, visual, textual, scientific, mathematical,
>>>>> etc., etc., etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> I accomplish more in a single day than you do in a whole year.
>>>>
>>>> Oh cool, what have you done?
>>>
>>> Feeb has left the building.
>>>
>>> He always runs when asked for proof of his outlandish boasting.
>>
>> That's because Stéphane and candycanearter07 are both superior Linux
>> users and posters, to him, he's a joke. The laughingstock of the
>> group. I'd rather have your Winblows setup, than his idiotic computer
>> system.
>
>At one point I had a Linux setup that looked kind of like his. I was
>running Openbox on Manjaro. You had to right-click on the blank screen
>to bring up a menu.
>
>On that system, the login screen and desktop you see were actually a
>separate graphical login manager (SLiM), window manager (Openbox),
>compositing mgr (compton), panel (tint2panel), right-click menu (Obmenu
>generator using xml) and wallpaper setter (Nitrogen using .png or .jpg).
> Each piece was installed and launched separately.
>
>It was fast, but kind of silly to use. After you installed an app, you
>had to manually run a separate program to force the new app to show up
>in the right-click menu. Or you could open some text file and add it
>manually.
>
>That's the kind of crap Feeb does 12 hours a day, when he's not busy
>doing Nobel-level scientific research.

ROFL!

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Le 21-11-2024, DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> a écrit :
> On 11/18/2024 9:40 AM, candycanearter07 wrote:
>> Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote at 11:21 this Sunday (GMT):
>>> On 17 Nov 2024 09:36:19 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll tell you a secret. I'm not the one unable to do what I want with my
>>>> computer. You are.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have another secret.
>>>
>>> YOU do very little with your computer. That's why you
>>> can easily get by with that wayland crap.
>>>
>>> In contrast, _I_ am involved in ALL forms of digital
>>> computation: audio, visual, textual, scientific, mathematical,
>>> etc., etc., etc.
>>>
>>> I accomplish more in a single day than you do in a whole year.
>>
>>
>> Oh cool, what have you done?
>
> Feeb has left the building.

Or is is trying to. Because one doesn't escape like that from an asylum.

> He always runs when asked for proof of his outlandish boasting.

Not always. Sometimes he changes the subject, asking the requester what
he does. But, like everything he does, he's very limited with his replies.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

> some dumb fsck wrote:
>>
>>At one point I had a Linux setup that looked kind of like his. I was
>>running Openbox on Manjaro. You had to right-click on the blank screen
>>to bring up a menu.
>>
>>On that system, the login screen and desktop you see were actually a
>>separate graphical login manager (SLiM), window manager (Openbox),
>>compositing mgr (compton), panel (tint2panel), right-click menu (Obmenu
>>generator using xml) and wallpaper setter (Nitrogen using .png or .jpg).
>> Each piece was installed and launched separately.
>>
>>It was fast, but kind of silly to use. After you installed an app, you
>>had to manually run a separate program to force the new app to show up
>>in the right-click menu. Or you could open some text file and add it
>>manually.
>>
>>That's the kind of crap Feeb does 12 hours a day, when he's not busy
>>doing Nobel-level scientific research.

What's "silly" or a "waste of time" to you, may be fun and rewarding
to others, you dumb fsck.

Who are you to judge?

Some of your shitty pals whined that, in order to choose a Linux
distro, one needs to do a little research and then try a few options.

Oh no! I might get distracted during "Dancing with the Stars"! What
a tragedy! Someone please just tell me what to use!

--
'"Lots of different distros" and "lots of different desktops" is a
NEGATIVE to most people.' - trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel"

Le 23-11-2024, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> a écrit :
>> some dumb fsck wrote:
>>>
>>>At one point I had a Linux setup that looked kind of like his. I was
>>>running Openbox on Manjaro. You had to right-click on the blank screen
>>>to bring up a menu.
>>>
>>>On that system, the login screen and desktop you see were actually a
>>>separate graphical login manager (SLiM), window manager (Openbox),
>>>compositing mgr (compton), panel (tint2panel), right-click menu (Obmenu
>>>generator using xml) and wallpaper setter (Nitrogen using .png or .jpg).
>>> Each piece was installed and launched separately.
>>>
>>>It was fast, but kind of silly to use. After you installed an app, you
>>>had to manually run a separate program to force the new app to show up
>>>in the right-click menu. Or you could open some text file and add it
>>>manually.
>>>
>>>That's the kind of crap Feeb does 12 hours a day, when he's not busy
>>>doing Nobel-level scientific research.
>
> What's "silly" or a "waste of time" to you, may be fun and rewarding
> to others, you dumb fsck.
>
> Who are you to judge?
>
> Some of your shitty pals whined that, in order to choose a Linux
> distro, one needs to do a little research and then try a few options.
>
> Oh no! I might get distracted during "Dancing with the Stars"! What
> a tragedy! Someone please just tell me what to use!

Thanks for the good laugh. It's exactly my point:
- You pretend to ignore him, but you answer his message.
- You pretend to let him having the last word, but you answer his
message.
You just failed in everything you claimed. Good job.

So, now, I'm ready to laugh even more: explain why you didn't failed and
why it proves your superiority. I'm going to fetch some popcorn: it's
going to be funny.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io