In article <vggerk$1ng26$5@dont-email.me>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>
> On 11/6/24 10:58 AM, pothead wrote:
> > On 2024-11-06, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >> On 11/5/24 9:15 AM, pothead wrote:
> >>> On 2024-11-05, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 11/4/24 5:01 PM, pothead wrote:
> >>>>> On 2024-11-04, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> >>>>>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>> L>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content, other than the
> >>>>>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The media was focused on
> >>>>>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only one senile old man
> >>>>>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is going on around him
> >>>>>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted already by early or
> >>>>>>>>> mail.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> <shrug>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Trump will win. Harris has just not shown the decisiveness, the *ownership* of
> >>>>>>>>> the office.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I fear you might be correct.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> NP: Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
> >>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy the lower
> >>>>>>> prices and closed border?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if Trump
> >>>>>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you $100:
> >>>>>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this wager?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> No bill needed.
> >>>>> Just reinstate the Trump policies that Biden/Harris rescinded on day one,...
> >>>>
> >>>> Just which Trump policy has survived Court rulings to make it legal?
> >>>> Go ahead and list them.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> ... continue
> >>>>> building the wall and add to it additional high tech monitoring and all
> >>>>> would be fine.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> And you're willing to pay how much more in income taxes to pay for what
> >>>> you want? Put up a number.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why did Biden/Harris/Majorkas claim for 3.5 years that the border was secure?
> >>>>
> >>>> Because CBP encounters were way up. CBP also reported that a lot of the
> >>>> apprehensions were repeats ... the same guy, again & again. I could
> >>>> look up the numbers, but my recollection is that something like 75% were
> >>>> repeats.
> >>>>
> >>>>> <https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/4455506-breaking-down-the-senate-border-bill-and-why-it-has-no-chance-of-passing/>
> >>>>
> >>>> No chance of passing isn't the same as saying if it would start to fix
> >>>> the immigration problems or not. Try again.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -hh
> >>>>
> >>> Interesting that a libby is all of a sudden interested in policies being legal.
> >>
> >> Oh, you'll find me stating "Rule of Law" many times in the archives.
> >> Case in point, here's one from over a decade ago:
> >>
> >> <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/6iliw4eou5o/m/0fV_yx55dWsJ>
> >>
> >>> Were you singing the same tune when Biden ignored the courts to find
> >>> a method to forgive student loans?
> >>
> >>
> >> Only comment I've made on that subject was to fact-check chrisv a year
> >> ago: he incorrectly claim that lost interest went to taxpayers. It
> >> doesn't: it goes to the banks servicing the loans.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Anyway the main policies such as:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Remain in Mexico
> >>> 2. No catch and release in US.
> >>>
> >>> As for legal challenges, remain in Mexico was ended by Biden, challenged in SCOTUS
> >>> who ruled in Biden's favor to end the policy however it was blocked by a federal judge
> >>> who ruled Biden did not have the authority to end the program.
> >>>
> >>> Either way, it was working.
> >>
> >> Except that the Judiciary Branch said it wasn't legal.
> >>
> >>
> >>> Instead of churning numbers, which suck BTW, why not read what the states and border
> >>> patrol think of Joe Biden and his open border.
> >>
> >> Before Trump spoke up, CPB was in favor of the 2024 Bipartisan Bill.
> >>
> >>
> >>> It's a disaster that his administration, including Harris, created and are 100% responsible
> >>> for.
> >>
> >> Immigration has been a political football for longer than Biden has been
> >> alive. And only a dishonest partisan blames the Executive Branch when
> >> the Judicial Branch concludes that a policy is unconstitutional.
> >>
> >>
> >> -hh
> >>
> > It hasn't been a political football nor a problem prior to Biden taking office
>
>
> Bull Shit.
>
> Trump, 2016: "Migrant Caravans!"

Like the one headed this way right now?
>
>
> > and turning that problem into at least 21 million migrants into the US which
> > is unprecedented.
>
>
> As I asked chrisv (which he "snipped unread" on):
> just what is the problem with having these immigrants? Be specific.

To many and we are paying them instead of our own.
>
> And reconcile it with what I've already said, including how the The
> Idaho Dairymen?s Association estimated that 89% of their state?s on-site
> dairy workers are foreign-born: do you have enough of an education on
> Supply & Demand to have a clue for what will happen to the availability
> and price of milk if 9 out of 10 workers get deported?

No matter. Enter legally and we're fine with it.
>
> Or is economics another subject you flunked, along with Engineering?

Obviously the current admin flunked.
>
>
> > Biden/Harris own this mess.
>
>
> Of these alleged 21 million migrants, just how many of them were already
> in the USA before 2021? Cite your sources.

Prove him wrong.
>
>
> > And when terrorists or bad actors in general start their attacks from within the US
> > Biden and Harris will own that coming disaster as well.
>
>
> As opposed to Russia putting bombs in Western cargo aircraft last week?

And? What does that have to do with anything?
>
>
> > It's not a matter of if but when.
> > And, sadly, it will make October 7th look like a day at Disney in comparison.
> >
>
> Oh but didn't you hear? Solving all wars is "easy" and will be done
> within 48 hours after he assumes office ...

Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vggdme$1ng26$4@dont-email.me>,
> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>
>> On 11/6/24 10:43 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vgg0vs$1njia$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 11/5/24 6:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vgbnta$16af1$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/4/24 8:27 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vgahgp$uo5b$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content, other than the
>>>>>>>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The media was focused on
>>>>>>>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only one senile old man
>>>>>>>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is going on around him
>>>>>>>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted already by early or
>>>>>>>>>>> mail.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <shrug>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Trump will win. Harris has just not shown the decisiveness, the *ownership* of
>>>>>>>>>>> the office.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I fear you might be correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> NP: Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy the lower
>>>>>>>>> prices and closed border?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if Trump
>>>>>>>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No bill needed. Just follow the law and cross only at legal crossing
>>>>>>> points. Get vetted and if you're clean then welcome. No bill needed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The law for requesting refugee status doesn't require crossing at a
>>>>>> legal point. And it doesn't have a monthly quota limit either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And we've had this discussion before: don't you remember how I gave you
>>>>>> the URL to the Statute and asked you to cite which line actually says
>>>>>> what you claim? Of course you remember .. because you ran away from it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you $100:
>>>>>>>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this wager?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stop being stupid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Translation: Skeeter knows that he's a BS'ing coward who can't back up
>>>>>> a damn thing he says.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I know the laws. That is good enough.
>>>>
>>>> [Morgan Freeman voice]
>>>>
>>>> "Which means that he doesn't actually know the law."
>>>>
>>>> [/Morgan Freeman voice]
>>>>
>>>> -hh
>>>
>>> Hey did you hear the news? The electoral vote, the popular vote and the
>>> senate. Tell us again how he's going to lose.
>>
>> Changing the subject? Telling.
>>
>>
>>
>> -hh
>
> I do as I please. You lost. Deal with it.
>

Huntzy is in direct violation of his oath to uphold and defend and
protect our constitution - just sayin'...

-hh wrote:
> Let us know if you're ever going to stop making baseless claims.
>
>
> -hh

Let us know when your active treason against our nation will stop, Huntzy.

On 11/6/24 3:57 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vggdme$1ng26$4@dont-email.me>,
> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>
>> On 11/6/24 10:43 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vgg0vs$1njia$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 11/5/24 6:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vgbnta$16af1$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/4/24 8:27 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vgahgp$uo5b$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content, other than the
>>>>>>>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The media was focused on
>>>>>>>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only one senile old man
>>>>>>>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is going on around him
>>>>>>>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted already by early or
>>>>>>>>>>> mail.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <shrug>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Trump will win. Harris has just not shown the decisiveness, the *ownership* of
>>>>>>>>>>> the office.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I fear you might be correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> NP: Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy the lower
>>>>>>>>> prices and closed border?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if Trump
>>>>>>>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No bill needed. Just follow the law and cross only at legal crossing
>>>>>>> points. Get vetted and if you're clean then welcome. No bill needed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The law for requesting refugee status doesn't require crossing at a
>>>>>> legal point. And it doesn't have a monthly quota limit either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And we've had this discussion before: don't you remember how I gave you
>>>>>> the URL to the Statute and asked you to cite which line actually says
>>>>>> what you claim? Of course you remember .. because you ran away from it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you $100:
>>>>>>>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this wager?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Stop being stupid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Translation: Skeeter knows that he's a BS'ing coward who can't back up
>>>>>> a damn thing he says.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I know the laws. That is good enough.
>>>>
>>>> [Morgan Freeman voice]
>>>>
>>>> "Which means that he doesn't actually know the law."
>>>>
>>>> [/Morgan Freeman voice]
>>>>
>>>> -hh
>>>
>>> Hey did you hear the news? The electoral vote, the popular vote and the
>>> senate. Tell us again how he's going to lose.
>>
>> Changing the subject? Telling.
>>
>>
>>
>> -hh
>
> I do as I please.

Yes, it is your choice to run away from your claims.

> You lost. Deal with it.

Nope, not at all, for you've been provided with the Statute and you've
not been able to prove me wrong by quoting the line with the requirement
that you claimed existed.

And that you now try to change the subject to the election is totally
irrelevant: we all see that you know that you're wrong on the law and
you just can't admit it.

-hh

In article <vggf81$1ng26$6@dont-email.me>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>
> On 11/6/24 1:41 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vggb9g$1njia$2@dont-email.me>,
> > recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>
> >> On 11/5/24 5:33 PM, pothead wrote:
> >>> On 2024-11-05, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> >>>> -hh wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Why did Biden/Harris/Majorkas claim for 3.5 years that the border was secure?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Because CBP encounters were way up.
> >>>>
> >>>> Remember, folks, -highhorse also vigorously defended the Secret
> >>>> Service, in the wake of the first Trump assiniation attempt.
> >>>>
> >>>> We should call him "the defender". No matter how bad it clearly is.
> >>>>
> >>> He's more of an American, capitalism hating treasonous human being.
> >>
> >> Odd how if I'm capitalist-hating that some rag on me for being
> >> supposedly the richest person here.
> >>
> >>
> >>> Back in the dark ages when I was studying engineering, the classic example of
> >>> the numbers NOT proving the end result was the hummingbird.
> >>
> >>
> >> Bumblebee. No wonder that you didn't *pass* & graduate.
> >
> > You don't know that liar.
>
> Gosh, golly: addressing the only part of the post that you think you
> have a chance on, so as to avoid all of the others. Telling!

Are you attention seeking?
>
>
> >>> While this has
> >>> changed over the years do to science, back then, according to classic
> >>> engineering the hummingbird should not be able to fly yet it does.
> >>
> >> Incorrect, for what that lesson was about (& which you didn't learn) was
> >> to understand humility - that our models have limitations. There's a
> >> similar adage that says "?All models are wrong, but some are useful.?
>
>
> How about addressing this statement, flunkee?

Yup, you are attention seeking.
>
>
> >>> This is hh.
> >>> He comes up with all kinds of statistics in an attempt to explain things away (economy)
> >>> yet the average person is suffering under this economy, badly.
> >>> It's like hh lives in a cocoon far from reality.
> >>
> >> False, for I've repeatedly pointed out our income inequity problem.
> >> FYI, I'm not going to benefit from a tax cut on incomes over $360K.
> >>
> >>> I'd love to see hh hook up with some progressive policitian and visit the local
> >>> Walmart or supermarket and attempt to explain how Biden/Harris have created
> >>> the best economy ever.
> >>
> >> I'd love to see you come up with a cite that says that I've ever claimed
> >> that we're currently in "the best economy ever". What I have said is
> >> that by objective metrics, it isn't as horrible as the GOP has claimed.
>
>
> Or this one, flunkee?
>
> >> And to that end, do explain to us now just how Trump's plan to raise
> >> taxes on 90% of Americans just to give another tax cuts to the 1% is
> >> going to help the struggling middle class and not hurt them further?
> >>
> >> Be specific, and don't forget that "Trickle Down" has *never* worked.
> >> FYI, the estimate on his plan is that will cost the average household an
> >> additional $1200/year.
>
> And this one, flunkee?
>
> >>> They would be tarred and feathered.
> >>>
> >>> Even Biden's own campaign staff advised him to stop promoting Bidenomics because
> >>> the people were not buying it.
> >>>
> >>> Hence the economy being #1 issue and the border #2.
> >>
> >> So explain to us just how Trump's plan to have Tariffs on all imports is
> >> going to lower personal expenses? FYI, the current estimate on his plan
> >> is that will cost every household an additional $3-4K/year.
> >>
> >>> I'd love to see hh show up at Roosavelt Ave in Queens NYC and tell the people
> >>> there how Biden/Harris is not responsible for the huge influx of trafficked women
> >>> being forced into sex slavery.
> >>> He would be lucky to escape with all of his body parts.
> >>
> >> Because human trafficking is suddenly a new thing? Think again.
>
>
> And another one, flunkee.
>
>
> >>
> >> Now the number of people prosecuted for human trafficking has doubled
> >> between 2011 to 2021:
> >>
> >> <https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/human-trafficking-data-collection-activities-2023>
> >>
> >> So lets see you show that the number of victims being trafficked has
> >> more than doubled since 2011, because if you can't, this doubling of the
> >> conviction rate is showing us that our law enforcement against this
> >> problem is getting better, not worse.
>
> Well, flukee?

"flukee"?
>
>
> >> Plus one can look to other countries to see how they address their
> >> prostitution and drug issues differently, and what the pros/cons of that
> >> are. Spend an evening in Freetown Christiania, for example...BTDT.
>
> FYI, Freetown Christiania is in Copenhagen, Denmark. They've reportedly
> cleaned it up since I spent time there.

So?
>
>
>
> >>> These armchair, stats worshiping libbys are idiots.
> >>> They can't see the forest fo the trees.
> >>
> >> Let us know if you're ever going to stop making baseless claims.
>
>
> Maybe Skeeter will post a pic of someone else's old textbooks, with a
> pink ... no, wait: "lavender" ... sneaker peeking out, waiting to
> trigger another snowflake. ;-P
>
She lost in a big way. You are now upset. I get that.

Lil dwarf Rudey wrote:
> Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <vggdme$1ng26$4@dont-email.me>,
>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>
>>> On 11/6/24 10:43 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>> In article <vgg0vs$1njia$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/5/24 6:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <vgbnta$16af1$2@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/4/24 8:27 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <vgahgp$uo5b$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit
>>>>>>>>>>>> <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The
>>>>>>>>>>>>> media was focused on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one senile old man
>>>>>>>>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on around him
>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted
>>>>>>>>>>>> already by early or
>>>>>>>>>>>> mail.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <shrug>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump will win.  Harris has just not shown the decisiveness,
>>>>>>>>>>>> the *ownership* of
>>>>>>>>>>>> the office.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I fear you might be correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> NP:  Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy the
>>>>>>>>>> lower
>>>>>>>>>> prices and closed border?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month
>>>>>>>>> if Trump
>>>>>>>>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be
>>>>>>>>> killed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No bill needed. Just follow the law and cross only at legal
>>>>>>>> crossing
>>>>>>>> points. Get vetted and if you're clean then welcome. No bill
>>>>>>>> needed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The law for requesting refugee status doesn't require crossing at a
>>>>>>> legal point.  And it doesn't have a monthly quota limit either.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And we've had this discussion before:  don't you remember how I
>>>>>>> gave you
>>>>>>> the URL to the Statute and asked you to cite which line actually
>>>>>>> says
>>>>>>> what you claim?  Of course you remember .. because you ran away
>>>>>>> from it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send
>>>>>>>>> you $100:
>>>>>>>>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this
>>>>>>>>> wager?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Stop being stupid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Translation:  Skeeter knows that he's a BS'ing coward who can't
>>>>>>> back up
>>>>>>> a damn thing he says.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know the laws. That is good enough.
>>>>>
>>>>> [Morgan Freeman voice]
>>>>>
>>>>> "Which means that he doesn't actually know the law."
>>>>>
>>>>> [/Morgan Freeman voice]
>>>>>
>>>>> -hh
>>>>
>>>> Hey did you hear the news? The electoral vote, the popular vote and the
>>>> senate. Tell us again how he's going to lose.
>>>
>>> Changing the subject?   Telling.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -hh
>>
>> I do as I please. You lost. Deal with it.
>>
>
> Huntzy is in direct violation of his oath to uphold and defend and
> protect our constitution - just sayin'...

you mean that thing he wants to throw away and never use it

On 11/6/24 2:18 PM, Lil dwarf Rudey wrote:
> -hh wrote:
>> Do you actually believe in what you say to be willing to put IRL money
>> where your mouth is and offer a reciprocation?
>>
>> Or will you be another coward and dodge, like Skeeter already has?
>>
>>
>> -hh
>
> THIS IS WHERE YOU ARE HEADED HUNTZY:
>
> Article III, Section 3, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution states:
>
> "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War
> against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and
> Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony
> of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."
>
> Article III, Section 3, Clause 2 states:
>
> "The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but
> no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture
> except during the Life of the Person attainted."
>
> Treason Explained
> The Constitution defines treason as levying war against the United
> States or giving its enemies "aid and comfort." It also specifies that
> the federal government cannot secure a conviction for treason unless two
> witnesses testify to the same overt act or if the person accused of
> treason confesses in open court.
>
> Clause 2 makes clear that Congress has the power to declare the
> punishment for treason.

Wannabee fascist says what? <g>

Okay, so you don't feel left out, I'll make the same offer to you too:

"On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you
$100: care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this
wager?"

So then, whats your reciprocating offer going to be?

Because if you really believe that you're going to now get price
deflation without a recession, you need to put up IRL money where your
mouth is, like I already have.

For a specific metric, you offer should be to reciprocate with a payment
of $100 for each quarter that the CPI-U exceeds 312.692, and if the US
goes into a recession, $100 for each quarter or fraction in recession.

Now everyone will see if you actually believe in what you say, or if
you're just another BSing luzer troglodyte that will dodge & blink.

-hh

On 11/6/24 4:02 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vggerk$1ng26$5@dont-email.me>,
> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>
>> On 11/6/24 10:58 AM, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2024-11-06, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>> On 11/5/24 9:15 AM, pothead wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-11-05, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/4/24 5:01 PM, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-11-04, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> L>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content, other than the
>>>>>>>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The media was focused on
>>>>>>>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only one senile old man
>>>>>>>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is going on around him
>>>>>>>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted already by early or
>>>>>>>>>>> mail.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <shrug>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Trump will win. Harris has just not shown the decisiveness, the *ownership* of
>>>>>>>>>>> the office.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I fear you might be correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> NP: Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy the lower
>>>>>>>>> prices and closed border?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if Trump
>>>>>>>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you $100:
>>>>>>>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this wager?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No bill needed.
>>>>>>> Just reinstate the Trump policies that Biden/Harris rescinded on day one,...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just which Trump policy has survived Court rulings to make it legal?
>>>>>> Go ahead and list them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... continue
>>>>>>> building the wall and add to it additional high tech monitoring and all
>>>>>>> would be fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And you're willing to pay how much more in income taxes to pay for what
>>>>>> you want? Put up a number.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why did Biden/Harris/Majorkas claim for 3.5 years that the border was secure?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because CBP encounters were way up. CBP also reported that a lot of the
>>>>>> apprehensions were repeats ... the same guy, again & again. I could
>>>>>> look up the numbers, but my recollection is that something like 75% were
>>>>>> repeats.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/4455506-breaking-down-the-senate-border-bill-and-why-it-has-no-chance-of-passing/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No chance of passing isn't the same as saying if it would start to fix
>>>>>> the immigration problems or not. Try again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting that a libby is all of a sudden interested in policies being legal.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, you'll find me stating "Rule of Law" many times in the archives.
>>>> Case in point, here's one from over a decade ago:
>>>>
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/6iliw4eou5o/m/0fV_yx55dWsJ>
>>>>
>>>>> Were you singing the same tune when Biden ignored the courts to find
>>>>> a method to forgive student loans?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Only comment I've made on that subject was to fact-check chrisv a year
>>>> ago: he incorrectly claim that lost interest went to taxpayers. It
>>>> doesn't: it goes to the banks servicing the loans.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Anyway the main policies such as:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Remain in Mexico
>>>>> 2. No catch and release in US.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for legal challenges, remain in Mexico was ended by Biden, challenged in SCOTUS
>>>>> who ruled in Biden's favor to end the policy however it was blocked by a federal judge
>>>>> who ruled Biden did not have the authority to end the program.
>>>>>
>>>>> Either way, it was working.
>>>>
>>>> Except that the Judiciary Branch said it wasn't legal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Instead of churning numbers, which suck BTW, why not read what the states and border
>>>>> patrol think of Joe Biden and his open border.
>>>>
>>>> Before Trump spoke up, CPB was in favor of the 2024 Bipartisan Bill.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> It's a disaster that his administration, including Harris, created and are 100% responsible
>>>>> for.
>>>>
>>>> Immigration has been a political football for longer than Biden has been
>>>> alive. And only a dishonest partisan blames the Executive Branch when
>>>> the Judicial Branch concludes that a policy is unconstitutional.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -hh
>>>>
>>> It hasn't been a political football nor a problem prior to Biden taking office
>>
>>
>> Bull Shit.
>>
>> Trump, 2016: "Migrant Caravans!"
>
> Like the one headed this way right now?

The ones that mysteriously disappear as soon as Trump was in office.

>>> and turning that problem into at least 21 million migrants into the US which
>>> is unprecedented.
>>
>>
>> As I asked chrisv (which he "snipped unread" on):
>> just what is the problem with having these immigrants? Be specific.
>
> To many and we are paying them instead of our own.

Conveniently vague.

FYI, they're paying over $50B/year into Social Security & Medicare that
they'll never eligible to collect on. Plus they're paying into State
sales & fuel taxes too.

>>
>> And reconcile it with what I've already said, including how the The
>> Idaho Dairymen?s Association estimated that 89% of their state?s on-site
>> dairy workers are foreign-born: do you have enough of an education on
>> Supply & Demand to have a clue for what will happen to the availability
>> and price of milk if 9 out of 10 workers get deported?
>
> No matter. Enter legally and we're fine with it.
>>
>> Or is economics another subject you flunked, along with Engineering?
>
> Obviously the current admin flunked.

In article <vgglot$28qmk$1@dont-email.me>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>
> On 11/6/24 3:57 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vggdme$1ng26$4@dont-email.me>,
> > recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>
> >> On 11/6/24 10:43 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vgg0vs$1njia$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 11/5/24 6:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vgbnta$16af1$2@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 11/4/24 8:27 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vgahgp$uo5b$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
> >>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> >>>>>>>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content, other than the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The media was focused on
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only one senile old man
> >>>>>>>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is going on around him
> >>>>>>>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted already by early or
> >>>>>>>>>>> mail.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> <shrug>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Trump will win. Harris has just not shown the decisiveness, the *ownership* of
> >>>>>>>>>>> the office.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I fear you might be correct.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> NP: Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy the lower
> >>>>>>>>> prices and closed border?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if Trump
> >>>>>>>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No bill needed. Just follow the law and cross only at legal crossing
> >>>>>>> points. Get vetted and if you're clean then welcome. No bill needed.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The law for requesting refugee status doesn't require crossing at a
> >>>>>> legal point. And it doesn't have a monthly quota limit either.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And we've had this discussion before: don't you remember how I gave you
> >>>>>> the URL to the Statute and asked you to cite which line actually says
> >>>>>> what you claim? Of course you remember .. because you ran away from it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you $100:
> >>>>>>>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this wager?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Stop being stupid.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Translation: Skeeter knows that he's a BS'ing coward who can't back up
> >>>>>> a damn thing he says.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I know the laws. That is good enough.
> >>>>
> >>>> [Morgan Freeman voice]
> >>>>
> >>>> "Which means that he doesn't actually know the law."
> >>>>
> >>>> [/Morgan Freeman voice]
> >>>>
> >>>> -hh
> >>>
> >>> Hey did you hear the news? The electoral vote, the popular vote and the
> >>> senate. Tell us again how he's going to lose.
> >>
> >> Changing the subject? Telling.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -hh
> >
> > I do as I please.
>
>
> Yes, it is your choice to run away from your claims.

I changed them. Like Harris did.
>
>
> > You lost. Deal with it.
>
> Nope, not at all, for you've been provided with the Statute and you've
> not been able to prove me wrong by quoting the line with the requirement
> that you claimed existed.

Huh?
>
> And that you now try to change the subject to the election is totally
> irrelevant: we all see that you know that you're wrong on the law and
> you just can't admit it.

So what? Like all liberals I won so that's good enough.
>
>
> -hh

In article <vggmf8$28tuh$2@dont-email.me>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>
> On 11/6/24 4:08 PM, % wrote:
> > Lil dwarf Rudey wrote:
> >> Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vggdme$1ng26$4@dont-email.me>,
> >>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 11/6/24 10:43 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vgg0vs$1njia$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 11/5/24 6:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vgbnta$16af1$2@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 11/4/24 8:27 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vgahgp$uo5b$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
> >>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> media was focused on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> one senile old man
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on around him
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> already by early or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mail.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <shrug>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump will win.  Harris has just not shown the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> decisiveness, the *ownership* of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the office.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I fear you might be correct.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NP:  Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy
> >>>>>>>>>>> the lower
> >>>>>>>>>>> prices and closed border?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/
> >>>>>>>>>> month if Trump
> >>>>>>>>>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be
> >>>>>>>>>> killed.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> No bill needed. Just follow the law and cross only at legal
> >>>>>>>>> crossing
> >>>>>>>>> points. Get vetted and if you're clean then welcome. No bill
> >>>>>>>>> needed.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The law for requesting refugee status doesn't require crossing at a
> >>>>>>>> legal point.  And it doesn't have a monthly quota limit either.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> And we've had this discussion before:  don't you remember how I
> >>>>>>>> gave you
> >>>>>>>> the URL to the Statute and asked you to cite which line actually
> >>>>>>>> says
> >>>>>>>> what you claim?  Of course you remember .. because you ran away
> >>>>>>>> from it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send
> >>>>>>>>>> you $100:
> >>>>>>>>>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on
> >>>>>>>>>> this wager?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Stop being stupid.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Translation:  Skeeter knows that he's a BS'ing coward who can't
> >>>>>>>> back up
> >>>>>>>> a damn thing he says.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I know the laws. That is good enough.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [Morgan Freeman voice]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "Which means that he doesn't actually know the law."
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [/Morgan Freeman voice]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hey did you hear the news? The electoral vote, the popular vote and
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> senate. Tell us again how he's going to lose.
> >>>>
> >>>> Changing the subject?   Telling.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -hh
> >>>
> >>> I do as I please. You lost. Deal with it.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Huntzy is in direct violation of his oath to uphold and defend and
> >> protect our constitution - just sayin'...
> >
> > you mean that thing he wants to throw away and never use it
>
> "But only on Day One" ...
>
> ... even though it only takes one day to declare martial law.
>
Why didn't he do it the first time he was in office?

In article <vggmgr$28tuh$3@dont-email.me>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>
> On 11/6/24 4:04 PM, Lil dwarf Rudey wrote:
> > Skeeter wrote:
> >> In article <vggdme$1ng26$4@dont-email.me>,
> >> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>
> >>> On 11/6/24 10:43 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>> In article <vgg0vs$1njia$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 11/5/24 6:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>> In article <vgbnta$16af1$2@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 11/4/24 8:27 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>> In article <vgahgp$uo5b$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
> >>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> >>>>>>>>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> other than the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> media was focused on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> one senile old man
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> going on around him
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted
> >>>>>>>>>>>> already by early or
> >>>>>>>>>>>> mail.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <shrug>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Trump will win.  Harris has just not shown the decisiveness,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the *ownership* of
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the office.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I fear you might be correct.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> NP:  Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy the
> >>>>>>>>>> lower
> >>>>>>>>>> prices and closed border?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month
> >>>>>>>>> if Trump
> >>>>>>>>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be
> >>>>>>>>> killed.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> No bill needed. Just follow the law and cross only at legal
> >>>>>>>> crossing
> >>>>>>>> points. Get vetted and if you're clean then welcome. No bill
> >>>>>>>> needed.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The law for requesting refugee status doesn't require crossing at a
> >>>>>>> legal point.  And it doesn't have a monthly quota limit either.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> And we've had this discussion before:  don't you remember how I
> >>>>>>> gave you
> >>>>>>> the URL to the Statute and asked you to cite which line actually
> >>>>>>> says
> >>>>>>> what you claim?  Of course you remember .. because you ran away
> >>>>>>> from it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send
> >>>>>>>>> you $100:
> >>>>>>>>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this
> >>>>>>>>> wager?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Stop being stupid.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Translation:  Skeeter knows that he's a BS'ing coward who can't
> >>>>>>> back up
> >>>>>>> a damn thing he says.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I know the laws. That is good enough.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [Morgan Freeman voice]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "Which means that he doesn't actually know the law."
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [/Morgan Freeman voice]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -hh
> >>>>
> >>>> Hey did you hear the news? The electoral vote, the popular vote and the
> >>>> senate. Tell us again how he's going to lose.
> >>>
> >>> Changing the subject?   Telling.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -hh
> >>
> >> I do as I please. You lost. Deal with it.
> >>
> >
> > Huntzy is in direct violation of his oath to uphold and defend and
> > protect our constitution - just sayin'...
>
> My oath is for the Constitution of the United States. Not Russia.
>
> So fuck off, Ivan.
>
> -hh

You have no oath.

In article <vggmc3$28tuh$1@dont-email.me>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>
> On 11/6/24 2:18 PM, Lil dwarf Rudey wrote:
> > -hh wrote:
> >> Do you actually believe in what you say to be willing to put IRL money
> >> where your mouth is and offer a reciprocation?
> >>
> >> Or will you be another coward and dodge, like Skeeter already has?
> >>
> >>
> >> -hh
> >
> > THIS IS WHERE YOU ARE HEADED HUNTZY:
> >
> > Article III, Section 3, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution states:
> >
> > "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War
> > against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and
> > Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony
> > of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."
> >
> > Article III, Section 3, Clause 2 states:
> >
> > "The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but
> > no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture
> > except during the Life of the Person attainted."
> >
> > Treason Explained
> > The Constitution defines treason as levying war against the United
> > States or giving its enemies "aid and comfort." It also specifies that
> > the federal government cannot secure a conviction for treason unless two
> > witnesses testify to the same overt act or if the person accused of
> > treason confesses in open court.
> >
> > Clause 2 makes clear that Congress has the power to declare the
> > punishment for treason.
>
> Wannabee fascist says what? <g>
>
>
> Okay, so you don't feel left out, I'll make the same offer to you too:
>
> "On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you
> $100: care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this
> wager?"
>
> So then, whats your reciprocating offer going to be?
>
> Because if you really believe that you're going to now get price
> deflation without a recession, you need to put up IRL money where your
> mouth is, like I already have.
>
> For a specific metric, you offer should be to reciprocate with a payment
> of $100 for each quarter that the CPI-U exceeds 312.692, and if the US
> goes into a recession, $100 for each quarter or fraction in recession.
>
> Now everyone will see if you actually believe in what you say, or if
> you're just another BSing luzer troglodyte that will dodge & blink.
>
>
She lost bigly. We won yugely.

In article <vggp57$29ld4$1@dont-email.me>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>
> On 11/6/24 4:02 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vggerk$1ng26$5@dont-email.me>,
> > recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>
> >> On 11/6/24 10:58 AM, pothead wrote:
> >>> On 2024-11-06, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 11/5/24 9:15 AM, pothead wrote:
> >>>>> On 2024-11-05, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 11/4/24 5:01 PM, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 2024-11-04, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> >>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> >>>>>>>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> L>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content, other than the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The media was focused on
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only one senile old man
> >>>>>>>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is going on around him
> >>>>>>>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted already by early or
> >>>>>>>>>>> mail.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> <shrug>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Trump will win. Harris has just not shown the decisiveness, the *ownership* of
> >>>>>>>>>>> the office.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I fear you might be correct.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> NP: Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy the lower
> >>>>>>>>> prices and closed border?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if Trump
> >>>>>>>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you $100:
> >>>>>>>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this wager?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No bill needed.
> >>>>>>> Just reinstate the Trump policies that Biden/Harris rescinded on day one,...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Just which Trump policy has survived Court rulings to make it legal?
> >>>>>> Go ahead and list them.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ... continue
> >>>>>>> building the wall and add to it additional high tech monitoring and all
> >>>>>>> would be fine.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And you're willing to pay how much more in income taxes to pay for what
> >>>>>> you want? Put up a number.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Why did Biden/Harris/Majorkas claim for 3.5 years that the border was secure?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Because CBP encounters were way up. CBP also reported that a lot of the
> >>>>>> apprehensions were repeats ... the same guy, again & again. I could
> >>>>>> look up the numbers, but my recollection is that something like 75% were
> >>>>>> repeats.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> <https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/4455506-breaking-down-the-senate-border-bill-and-why-it-has-no-chance-of-passing/>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> No chance of passing isn't the same as saying if it would start to fix
> >>>>>> the immigration problems or not. Try again.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -hh
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Interesting that a libby is all of a sudden interested in policies being legal.
> >>>>
> >>>> Oh, you'll find me stating "Rule of Law" many times in the archives.
> >>>> Case in point, here's one from over a decade ago:
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/6iliw4eou5o/m/0fV_yx55dWsJ>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Were you singing the same tune when Biden ignored the courts to find
> >>>>> a method to forgive student loans?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Only comment I've made on that subject was to fact-check chrisv a year
> >>>> ago: he incorrectly claim that lost interest went to taxpayers. It
> >>>> doesn't: it goes to the banks servicing the loans.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Anyway the main policies such as:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. Remain in Mexico
> >>>>> 2. No catch and release in US.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> As for legal challenges, remain in Mexico was ended by Biden, challenged in SCOTUS
> >>>>> who ruled in Biden's favor to end the policy however it was blocked by a federal judge
> >>>>> who ruled Biden did not have the authority to end the program.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Either way, it was working.
> >>>>
> >>>> Except that the Judiciary Branch said it wasn't legal.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Instead of churning numbers, which suck BTW, why not read what the states and border
> >>>>> patrol think of Joe Biden and his open border.
> >>>>
> >>>> Before Trump spoke up, CPB was in favor of the 2024 Bipartisan Bill.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> It's a disaster that his administration, including Harris, created and are 100% responsible
> >>>>> for.
> >>>>
> >>>> Immigration has been a political football for longer than Biden has been
> >>>> alive. And only a dishonest partisan blames the Executive Branch when
> >>>> the Judicial Branch concludes that a policy is unconstitutional.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -hh
> >>>>
> >>> It hasn't been a political football nor a problem prior to Biden taking office
> >>
> >>
> >> Bull Shit.
> >>
> >> Trump, 2016: "Migrant Caravans!"
> >
> > Like the one headed this way right now?
>
> The ones that mysteriously disappear as soon as Trump was in office.
>
>
>
> >>> and turning that problem into at least 21 million migrants into the US which
> >>> is unprecedented.
> >>
> >>
> >> As I asked chrisv (which he "snipped unread" on):
> >> just what is the problem with having these immigrants? Be specific.
> >
> > To many and we are paying them instead of our own.
>
>
> Conveniently vague.
>
> FYI, they're paying over $50B/year into Social Security & Medicare that
> they'll never eligible to collect on. Plus they're paying into State
> sales & fuel taxes too.
>
>
>
>
> >>
> >> And reconcile it with what I've already said, including how the The
> >> Idaho Dairymen?s Association estimated that 89% of their state?s on-site
> >> dairy workers are foreign-born: do you have enough of an education on
> >> Supply & Demand to have a clue for what will happen to the availability
> >> and price of milk if 9 out of 10 workers get deported?
> >
> > No matter. Enter legally and we're fine with it.
> >>
> >> Or is economics another subject you flunked, along with Engineering?
> >
> > Obviously the current admin flunked.
>
> Flunkee claims ...just what?
>
>
> >>> Biden/Harris own this mess.
> >>
> >>
> >> Of these alleged 21 million migrants, just how many of them were already
> >> in the USA before 2021? Cite your sources.
> >
> > Prove him wrong.
>
> Easily done in part, for the total's been estimated at 12M as per the
> below cite, but that's the total, not delineated by arrival year.
>
> As such, over 57% of your unsubstantiated claim's "problem" has been
> wiped out before we even look to see if we can ID arrival#s to an
> Administration.
>
> <https://reason.org/commentary/illegal-immigrants-are-paying/>
>
>
> >>> And when terrorists or bad actors in general start their attacks from within the US
> >>> Biden and Harris will own that coming disaster as well.
> >>
> >>
> >> As opposed to Russia putting bombs in Western cargo aircraft last week?
> >
> > And? What does that have to do with anything?
>
> Because you invoked "But Terrorists!" as yet another diversion attempt.
>
>
> >>> It's not a matter of if but when.
> >>> And, sadly, it will make October 7th look like a day at Disney in comparison.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Oh but didn't you hear? Solving all wars is "easy" and will be done
> >> within 48 hours after he assumes office ...
> >
> > No doubt.
>
> Oh, so you don't believe him either. What do you think the likelihood
> is for the apartheid state of Israel to wipe Palestine off the map?
>
> >>
> >> ... right after the Healthcare & Infrastructure plans are published from
> >> their 2021 due dates, of course. /s
> >>
> >
> > The ones the left hid?
> >
> >> So just like I said to Skeeter:
> >
> > Hi.
> >>
> >> "On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you
> >> $100: care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this
> >> wager?"
> >>
> >> I'm now making the same offer to you too, Pothead.
> >>
> >> So how about it, Pothead? Do you actually believe in what you say to be
> >> willing to put IRL money where your mouth is and offer a reciprocation?
> >
> > You don't have a $100 to spare.
>
> As if I'd risk my reputation online for only $100.
>
> >>
> >> Or will you be another coward and dodge, like Skeeter already has?
> >>
> > Shit my team won. What else do you need from me?
>
> Nothing to do with who won the election, but the promises that they made
> which you clearly believed. Are you now bailing out on believing them?
>
>
> -hh

Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
>news:vggvaa$2aq9b$1@dont-email.me:
>
>> Trump, as usual gets all the free press and wins in the end.
>> He's a master at marketing.
>
> Actually you are right.
>
> Marketing a phony charity so he
>steal from it, marketing a phony
>university so he can scam "students",
>marketing a casino that he scammed
>his investors to pay for, marketing
>his fidelity to wife after wife
>that he cheated on.
>
> So many people trusted him, so
>many were betrayed.
>
> And the gullible trust him still.

Make Hitler dead again!

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Make Hitler dead again!

When are you going to get off your faggot ass and *do* something about
him?

On 2024-11-06, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <vggmf8$28tuh$2@dont-email.me>,
> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>>
>> On 11/6/24 4:08 PM, % wrote:
>> > Lil dwarf Rudey wrote:
>> >> Skeeter wrote:
>> >>> In article <vggdme$1ng26$4@dont-email.me>,
>> >>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 11/6/24 10:43 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >>>>> In article <vgg0vs$1njia$1@dont-email.me>,
>> >>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On 11/5/24 6:54 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >>>>>>> In article <vgbnta$16af1$2@dont-email.me>,
>> >>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On 11/4/24 8:27 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> In article <vgahgp$uo5b$1@dont-email.me>,
>> >>>>>>>>> recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
>> >>>>>>>>> says...
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> >>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content,
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> other than the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> media was focused on
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> one senile old man
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> going on around him
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> already by early or
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mail.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <shrug>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump will win.  Harris has just not shown the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> decisiveness, the *ownership* of
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the office.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I fear you might be correct.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> NP:  Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy
>> >>>>>>>>>>> the lower
>> >>>>>>>>>>> prices and closed border?
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/
>> >>>>>>>>>> month if Trump
>> >>>>>>>>>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be
>> >>>>>>>>>> killed.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> No bill needed. Just follow the law and cross only at legal
>> >>>>>>>>> crossing
>> >>>>>>>>> points. Get vetted and if you're clean then welcome. No bill
>> >>>>>>>>> needed.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> The law for requesting refugee status doesn't require crossing at a
>> >>>>>>>> legal point.  And it doesn't have a monthly quota limit either.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> And we've had this discussion before:  don't you remember how I
>> >>>>>>>> gave you
>> >>>>>>>> the URL to the Statute and asked you to cite which line actually
>> >>>>>>>> says
>> >>>>>>>> what you claim?  Of course you remember .. because you ran away
>> >>>>>>>> from it.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send
>> >>>>>>>>>> you $100:
>> >>>>>>>>>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on
>> >>>>>>>>>> this wager?
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Stop being stupid.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Translation:  Skeeter knows that he's a BS'ing coward who can't
>> >>>>>>>> back up
>> >>>>>>>> a damn thing he says.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I know the laws. That is good enough.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> [Morgan Freeman voice]
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> "Which means that he doesn't actually know the law."
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> [/Morgan Freeman voice]
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> -hh
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hey did you hear the news? The electoral vote, the popular vote and
>> >>>>> the
>> >>>>> senate. Tell us again how he's going to lose.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Changing the subject?   Telling.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -hh
>> >>>
>> >>> I do as I please. You lost. Deal with it.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> Huntzy is in direct violation of his oath to uphold and defend and
>> >> protect our constitution - just sayin'...
>> >
>> > you mean that thing he wants to throw away and never use it
>>
>> "But only on Day One" ...
>>
>> ... even though it only takes one day to declare martial law.
>>
> Why didn't he do it the first time he was in office?
>
>
Because Trump did not nor has no intention of doing such. It was a joke, albeit
a stupid one, making reference to all of the horrid policies of the Biden administration
that he intends to reverse via EO on day one.

Kind of like Biden did to Trump.

The left of course ran with it and continues to do so.
Trump, as usual gets all the free press and wins in the end.
He's a master at marketing.

--
pothead

See Kamala Harris best interview ever.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363352689112
She really knocks this one out of the park.
Don't you agree?

On 2024-11-06, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> On 11/5/24 9:15 AM, pothead wrote:
>> On 2024-11-05, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/4/24 5:01 PM, pothead wrote:
>>>> On 2024-11-04, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>> L>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content, other than the
>>>>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The media was focused on
>>>>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only one senile old man
>>>>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is going on around him
>>>>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted already by early or
>>>>>>>> mail.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <shrug>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Trump will win. Harris has just not shown the decisiveness, the *ownership* of
>>>>>>>> the office.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I fear you might be correct.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> NP: Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy the lower
>>>>>> prices and closed border?
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if Trump
>>>>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.
>>>>>
>>>>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you $100:
>>>>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this wager?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -hh
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No bill needed.
>>>> Just reinstate the Trump policies that Biden/Harris rescinded on day one,...
>>>
>>> Just which Trump policy has survived Court rulings to make it legal?
>>> Go ahead and list them.
>>>
>>>
>>>> ... continue
>>>> building the wall and add to it additional high tech monitoring and all
>>>> would be fine.
>>>
>>>
>>> And you're willing to pay how much more in income taxes to pay for what
>>> you want? Put up a number.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why did Biden/Harris/Majorkas claim for 3.5 years that the border was secure?
>>>
>>> Because CBP encounters were way up. CBP also reported that a lot of the
>>> apprehensions were repeats ... the same guy, again & again. I could
>>> look up the numbers, but my recollection is that something like 75% were
>>> repeats.
>>>
>>>> <https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/4455506-breaking-down-the-senate-border-bill-and-why-it-has-no-chance-of-passing/>
>>>
>>> No chance of passing isn't the same as saying if it would start to fix
>>> the immigration problems or not. Try again.
>>>
>>>
>>> -hh
>>>
>> Interesting that a libby is all of a sudden interested in policies being legal.
>
> Oh, you'll find me stating "Rule of Law" many times in the archives.
> Case in point, here's one from over a decade ago:

When your side is guilty of violating it?
That's the point.

><https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/6iliw4eou5o/m/0fV_yx55dWsJ>
>
>> Were you singing the same tune when Biden ignored the courts to find
>> a method to forgive student loans?
>
>
> Only comment I've made on that subject was to fact-check chrisv a year
> ago: he incorrectly claim that lost interest went to taxpayers. It
> doesn't: it goes to the banks servicing the loans.
>

I don't care what anyone else says.
So you have criticized the democrats when they violate the rule of law?

>
>> Anyway the main policies such as:
>>
>> 1. Remain in Mexico
>> 2. No catch and release in US.
>>
>> As for legal challenges, remain in Mexico was ended by Biden, challenged in SCOTUS
>> who ruled in Biden's favor to end the policy however it was blocked by a federal judge
>> who ruled Biden did not have the authority to end the program.
>>
>> Either way, it was working.
>
> Except that the Judiciary Branch said it wasn't legal.

It is still being litigated.

>
>> Instead of churning numbers, which suck BTW, why not read what the states and border
>> patrol think of Joe Biden and his open border.
>
> Before Trump spoke up, CPB was in favor of the 2024 Bipartisan Bill.

And then they actually learned what was in the bill.
End of story.

Whether Trump used it as a political pawn or not doesn't matter as the bill was
a disaster.
And why did the democrats claim the border has been secure for 3.5 years?
You are arguing a point that you cannot win.

>
>> It's a disaster that his administration, including Harris, created and are 100% responsible
>> for.
>
> Immigration has been a political football for longer than Biden has been
> alive. And only a dishonest partisan blames the Executive Branch when
> the Judicial Branch concludes that a policy is unconstitutional.
>
>
> -hh
>

--
pothead

See Kamala Harris best interview ever.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363352689112
She really knocks this one out of the park.
Don't you agree?

On 2024-11-06, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> On 11/6/24 10:58 AM, pothead wrote:
>> On 2024-11-06, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>> On 11/5/24 9:15 AM, pothead wrote:
>>>> On 2024-11-05, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 11/4/24 5:01 PM, pothead wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-11-04, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>>>>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> L>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content, other than the
>>>>>>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The media was focused on
>>>>>>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only one senile old man
>>>>>>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is going on around him
>>>>>>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted already by early or
>>>>>>>>>> mail.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> <shrug>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Trump will win. Harris has just not shown the decisiveness, the *ownership* of
>>>>>>>>>> the office.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I fear you might be correct.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> NP: Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy the lower
>>>>>>>> prices and closed border?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if Trump
>>>>>>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you $100:
>>>>>>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this wager?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No bill needed.
>>>>>> Just reinstate the Trump policies that Biden/Harris rescinded on day one,...
>>>>>
>>>>> Just which Trump policy has survived Court rulings to make it legal?
>>>>> Go ahead and list them.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> ... continue
>>>>>> building the wall and add to it additional high tech monitoring and all
>>>>>> would be fine.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And you're willing to pay how much more in income taxes to pay for what
>>>>> you want? Put up a number.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why did Biden/Harris/Majorkas claim for 3.5 years that the border was secure?
>>>>>
>>>>> Because CBP encounters were way up. CBP also reported that a lot of the
>>>>> apprehensions were repeats ... the same guy, again & again. I could
>>>>> look up the numbers, but my recollection is that something like 75% were
>>>>> repeats.
>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/4455506-breaking-down-the-senate-border-bill-and-why-it-has-no-chance-of-passing/>
>>>>>
>>>>> No chance of passing isn't the same as saying if it would start to fix
>>>>> the immigration problems or not. Try again.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -hh
>>>>>
>>>> Interesting that a libby is all of a sudden interested in policies being legal.
>>>
>>> Oh, you'll find me stating "Rule of Law" many times in the archives.
>>> Case in point, here's one from over a decade ago:
>>>
>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.linux.advocacy/c/6iliw4eou5o/m/0fV_yx55dWsJ>
>>>
>>>> Were you singing the same tune when Biden ignored the courts to find
>>>> a method to forgive student loans?
>>>
>>>
>>> Only comment I've made on that subject was to fact-check chrisv a year
>>> ago: he incorrectly claim that lost interest went to taxpayers. It
>>> doesn't: it goes to the banks servicing the loans.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Anyway the main policies such as:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Remain in Mexico
>>>> 2. No catch and release in US.
>>>>
>>>> As for legal challenges, remain in Mexico was ended by Biden, challenged in SCOTUS
>>>> who ruled in Biden's favor to end the policy however it was blocked by a federal judge
>>>> who ruled Biden did not have the authority to end the program.
>>>>
>>>> Either way, it was working.
>>>
>>> Except that the Judiciary Branch said it wasn't legal.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Instead of churning numbers, which suck BTW, why not read what the states and border
>>>> patrol think of Joe Biden and his open border.
>>>
>>> Before Trump spoke up, CPB was in favor of the 2024 Bipartisan Bill.
>>>
>>>
>>>> It's a disaster that his administration, including Harris, created and are 100% responsible
>>>> for.
>>>
>>> Immigration has been a political football for longer than Biden has been
>>> alive. And only a dishonest partisan blames the Executive Branch when
>>> the Judicial Branch concludes that a policy is unconstitutional.
>>>
>>>
>>> -hh
>>>
>> It hasn't been a political football nor a problem prior to Biden taking office
>
>
> Bull Shit.
>
> Trump, 2016: "Migrant Caravans!"

So?
He was correct.
He was also correct when he stated that we are not getting the brightest and best
coming into our country.
Fact.

>
>> and turning that problem into at least 21 million migrants into the US which
>> is unprecedented.
>
>
> As I asked chrisv (which he "snipped unread" on):
> just what is the problem with having these immigrants? Be specific.

Huh?
They are unvetted.
We have no idea who these people are, what their past is and why they want to
come here.
You sure don't sound like a military person.
Perhaps a civie?

LEGAL MIGRATION is the answer.
Stand in line like millions of others have for centuries.

And yes, the system needs a major overhaul.
It really does.

> And reconcile it with what I've already said, including how the The
> Idaho Dairymen’s Association estimated that 89% of their state’s on-site
> dairy workers are foreign-born: do you have enough of an education on
> Supply & Demand to have a clue for what will happen to the availability
> and price of milk if 9 out of 10 workers get deported?

Fine.
Let them apply legally.
Nobody is claiming migrants are bad, they buiit America however it
needs to be controlled.
Just letting anyone in who manages to answer the questions on an iPhone app
is absolutely crazy.

See NYC for details and many examples.

> Or is economics another subject you flunked, along with Engineering?

Wrong.
I earned a BSEE with a minor in physics.
So essentially 2 degrees.
Graduated with a 3.7 GPA, yea I was a bit lazy back then.
I had a job 3 months before I graduated.
Oh yea, all while working to pay my way through college because at the time I was
the wrong color to get free money. And that's basically what the University told me.
Next.
>
>> Biden/Harris own this mess.
>
>
> Of these alleged 21 million migrants, just how many of them were already
> in the USA before 2021? Cite your sources.

-hh wrote:
> Nothing to do with who won the election,

Shut your treasonous piehole, Huntzy.

On 2024-11-06, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> On 11/5/24 5:33 PM, pothead wrote:
>> On 2024-11-05, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>> -hh wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Why did Biden/Harris/Majorkas claim for 3.5 years that the border was secure?
>>>>
>>>> Because CBP encounters were way up.
>>>
>>> Remember, folks, -highhorse also vigorously defended the Secret
>>> Service, in the wake of the first Trump assiniation attempt.
>>>
>>> We should call him "the defender". No matter how bad it clearly is.
>>>
>> He's more of an American, capitalism hating treasonous human being.
>
> Odd how if I'm capitalist-hating that some rag on me for being
> supposedly the richest person here.

Wealthy people don't make statements like that.
Either way it's not relevant.
Not every capitalist is wealthy.
Most are probably not.
Capitalism doesn't guarantee wealth.

Oh, as for you being the richest person here, I have no idea nor do I care.
You are however, without doubt, the most boring person here. Although
your new found best buddy snit supports you.
ROTFLMAO!

>
>> Back in the dark ages when I was studying engineering, the classic example of
>> the numbers NOT proving the end result was the hummingbird.
>
>
> Bumblebee. No wonder that you didn't *pass* & graduate.

That's another valid example.
The classic example when i was in school was the hummingbird. How does it fly backwards?
How can it fly through spaces not wide enough for it's wings etc.

As for graduating, I earned a BSEE with a minor in physics.
So once again you are incorrect.

Snip----answered in another post.

> Let us know if you're ever going to stop making baseless claims.
>
>
> -hh

They are not baseless claims.

Issues for voters:
1. the economy.
2. The border.

That is why Trump won despite your number churning.

--
pothead

See Kamala Harris best interview ever.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363352689112
She really knocks this one out of the park.
Don't you agree?

pothead wrote:

> -highhorse wrote:
>>
>> Odd how if I'm capitalist-hating that some rag on me for being
>> supposedly the richest person here.

Hahaha! Example quote and/or message ID?

In any case, -highhorse's "Odd how if" "logic" is typical -highhorse
garbage "logic". There's actually no connection.

> as for you being the richest person here, I have no idea nor do I care.

Look out, -highhorse will attack you with "Occam's Razor", which he
can snittishly claim "proves" whatever he says that it does.

--
"Well, the plethora of posts & posters that have latched onto this
thread since I first made comment is certain proof of motivation! And
the simplest explanation (IAW Occam's Razor) is jealousy." - lying
asshole "-hh", lying shamelessly

pothead wrote:

> -highhorse wrote:
>>
>> As I asked chrisv (which he "snipped unread" on):
>> just what is the problem with having these immigrants? Be specific.

Lie. I read and answered that question. Too many, too quickly.
Overwhelming our systems. Not vetted for their need or for our
benefit.

>They are unvetted.
> (snip)
>LEGAL MIGRATION is the answer.
>Stand in line like millions of others have for centuries.

Exactly.

>> And reconcile it with what I've already said, including how the The
>> Idaho Dairymen’s Association estimated that 89% of their state’s on-site
>> dairy workers are foreign-born: do you have enough of an education on
>> Supply & Demand to have a clue for what will happen to the availability
>> and price of milk if 9 out of 10 workers get deported?
>
>Fine.
>Let them apply legally.
>Nobody is claiming migrants are bad, they buiit America however it
>needs to be controlled.

Right.

A few years ago I was making the same case as -highhorse is today, and
I've not changed my position. Some immigration is a good thing. But
it must be regulated to a rate which can be comfortably absorbed.

chrisv wrote:

> pothead wrote:
>>
>> -highhorse wrote:
>>>
>>> And reconcile it with what I've already said, including how the The
>>> Idaho Dairymen’s Association estimated that 89% of their state’s on-site
>>> dairy workers are foreign-born: do you have enough of an education on
>>> Supply & Demand to have a clue for what will happen to the availability
>>> and price of milk if 9 out of 10 workers get deported?

I should have mentioned that the above is a classic example of garbage
argument that -highhorse spews that, apparently, fools some people
(like vallor).

I've made many arguments over the years extolling the benefits of
immigrants in this country. To pretend that I would support deporting
9 out of 10 migrant workers, or stop all immigration, is a ridiculous
straw-man argument.

I don't care if someone else said something stupid. Don't pin it on
me. Presenting some "article" that talks of the benefits of
immigration, within _reason_, is not telling me something that I don't
already know.

>>Fine.
>>Let them apply legally.
>>Nobody is claiming migrants are bad, they buiit America however it
>>needs to be controlled.
>
>Right.
>
>A few years ago I was making the same case as -highhorse is today, and
>I've not changed my position. Some immigration is a good thing. But
>it must be regulated to a rate which can be comfortably absorbed.

On 2024-11-07, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> pothead wrote:
>
>> -highhorse wrote:
>>>
>>> As I asked chrisv (which he "snipped unread" on):
>>> just what is the problem with having these immigrants? Be specific.
>
> Lie. I read and answered that question. Too many, too quickly.
> Overwhelming our systems. Not vetted for their need or for our
> benefit.
>
>>They are unvetted.
>> (snip)
>>LEGAL MIGRATION is the answer.
>>Stand in line like millions of others have for centuries.
>
> Exactly.

Yes.

>>> And reconcile it with what I've already said, including how the The
>>> Idaho Dairymen’s Association estimated that 89% of their state’s on-site
>>> dairy workers are foreign-born: do you have enough of an education on
>>> Supply & Demand to have a clue for what will happen to the availability
>>> and price of milk if 9 out of 10 workers get deported?
>>
>>Fine.
>>Let them apply legally.
>>Nobody is claiming migrants are bad, they buiit America however it
>>needs to be controlled.
>
> Right.

Everything needs to be controlled to some degree.
Biden Harris opened the borders from day one with their "you are welcome here
in the US" rhetoric and it's been a disaster.

> A few years ago I was making the same case as -highhorse is today, and
> I've not changed my position. Some immigration is a good thing. But
> it must be regulated to a rate which can be comfortably absorbed.

Of course.
Ask EU how well open borders and open immigration policies are working for
them.
It's a disaster.

The US needs to completely overhaul the immigration systems and put money
into it.

--
pothead

See Kamala Harris best interview ever.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363352689112
She really knocks this one out of the park.
Don't you agree?

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:vggvaa$2aq9b$1@dont-email.me:

>
> Trump, as usual gets all the free press and wins in the end.
> He's a master at marketing.

Actually you are right.

Marketing a phony charity so he
steal from it, marketing a phony
university so he can scam "students",
marketing a casino that he scammed
his investors to pay for, marketing
his fidelity to wife after wife
that he cheated on.

So many people trusted him, so
many were betrayed.

And the gullible trust him still.