Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>> Then come at me, punk, but you won't, because you're all talk, you're
>> a pussy-ass bitch. I'd rape your ugly-ass, bitch, Down Syndrome
>> mother in the asshole, faggot retard.

People find pleasure where they do. I do not have understand, just
wish them well. I am sad that we keep sacrificing intimate acts of
sharing and love to political brutal.

Imagine a boot forever stamping your tender nethers.

--
Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>> Uh huh, dumbshit old white mother fucker, you wouldn't step to me with[out]
>> your fucking guns, dummy. I could kick the crap out of you.
>>
>I would.
>I'm just a girl with a red belt however looking at your scrawny picture on your
>license, which you posted, and other places online, unless you were on some
>huge meth trip with super human strength you would be neutralized in 30 seconds
>or less.
>And if not, my big brother, a recent black belt would quickly send your head up Uranus.
>
>Of course I am not a violent person and neither is my brother however both of us
>are quite capable of defending ourselves against predators of all kinds.
>As should you be as well.

I've posted my images, name and location, and a bunch of anonymous
pussies are threatening me, and not doing shit to make it real - I won
by default. Enjoy it.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

In article <1kkiij1aaesvol1b00eiennfbftph7aael@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
> >> Uh huh, dumbshit old white mother fucker, you wouldn't step to me with[out]
> >> your fucking guns, dummy. I could kick the crap out of you.
> >>
> >I would.
> >I'm just a girl with a red belt however looking at your scrawny picture on your
> >license, which you posted, and other places online, unless you were on some
> >huge meth trip with super human strength you would be neutralized in 30 seconds
> >or less.
> >And if not, my big brother, a recent black belt would quickly send your head up Uranus.
> >
> >Of course I am not a violent person and neither is my brother however both of us
> >are quite capable of defending ourselves against predators of all kinds.
> >As should you be as well.
>
>
> I've posted my images, name and location, and a bunch of anonymous
> pussies are threatening me, and not doing shit to make it real - I won
> by default. Enjoy it.

All you won is the keyboard warrior faggot participation award.

Siri Cruise wrote:
>
> Imagine a boot forever stamping your tender nethers.

Is that a demonstration your ill-claimed "empathy", meth whore?

Joel wrote:
> I've posted my images, name and location

Bullshit lie.

[Default] Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>> Then come at me, punk, but you won't, because you're all talk, you're
>>> a pussy-ass bitch. I'd rape your ugly-ass, bitch, Down Syndrome
>>> mother in the asshole, faggot retard.

>>Here's a picture of Joel The Destroyer, if you're thinking of taking
>>him on.
>>
>>https://i.imgur.com/RgAqETe.jpg

>People find pleasure where they do. I do not have understand, just
>wish them well. I am sad that we keep sacrificing intimate acts of
>sharing and love to political brutal.
>
>Imagine a boot forever stamping your tender nethers.

Nah, I'd just shoot them.

-hh wrote:

>Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if Trump
>hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.

The Biden administration "saw the light" a few months before the
election, eh, -highhorse?

Silly political games.

Immigrations *surged* under their policies.

On 11/4/24 8:27 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vgahgp$uo5b$1@dont-email.me>, recscuba_google@huntzinger.com
> says...
>>
>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content, other than the
>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The media was focused on
>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only one senile old man
>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is going on around him
>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted already by early or
>>>>> mail.
>>>>>
>>>>> <shrug>
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump will win. Harris has just not shown the decisiveness, the *ownership* of
>>>>> the office.
>>>>
>>>> I fear you might be correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> NP: Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
>>>
>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy the lower
>>> prices and closed border?
>>
>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if Trump
>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.
>
> No bill needed. Just follow the law and cross only at legal crossing
> points. Get vetted and if you're clean then welcome. No bill needed.

The law for requesting refugee status doesn't require crossing at a
legal point. And it doesn't have a monthly quota limit either.

And we've had this discussion before: don't you remember how I gave you
the URL to the Statute and asked you to cite which line actually says
what you claim? Of course you remember .. because you ran away from it.

>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you $100:
>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this wager?
>
> Stop being stupid.

Translation: Skeeter knows that he's a BS'ing coward who can't back up
a damn thing he says.

-hh

On 11/4/24 12:29 PM, Citizen Winston Smith wrote:
> On 11/4/2024 6:17 AM, -hh wrote:
>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if
>> Trump hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.
>
> The legislation would have INCREASED illegal immigration, you lying
> demotarded cuntbag.

Really? Cite that passage in the legislation. I'll wait.

-hh

-hh wrote:
> The law for requesting refugee status doesn't require crossing at a
> legal point.

There is no law at our border under Xiden, you treasonous scumbag.

-hh wrote:
> On 11/4/24 12:29 PM, Citizen Winston Smith wrote:
>> On 11/4/2024 6:17 AM, -hh wrote:
>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if
>>> Trump hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be
>>> killed.
>>
>> The legislation would have INCREASED illegal immigration, you lying
>> demotarded cuntbag.
>
>
> Really?

Really.

Now foad, traitor.

chrisv wrote:

>-hh wrote:
>
>>Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if Trump
>>hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.
>
>The Biden administration "saw the light" a few months before the
>election, eh, -highhorse?
>
>Silly political games.
>
>Immigrations *surged* under their policies.

Here's a short for -highhorse.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/X-jHOKswJ78

On 11/4/24 5:01 PM, pothead wrote:
> On 2024-11-04, -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>> On 11/3/24 9:25 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <6726f4e0$0$2385543$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 2, 2024 at 8:03:34 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>> <qopdijd7ms9h2tqgjbah19l27picjvdhg2@4ax.com>:
>>>>
> L>>>> On 02 Nov 2024 19:59:03 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You keep going off topic. Why not respond to the content, other than the
>>>>>> reason you have already given -- you are a coward. The media was focused on
>>>>>> the senility of the candidates... now when there is only one senile old man
>>>>>> who clearly has lost his ability to understand what is going on around him
>>>>>> they have dropped that. Why do you think that is?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nearly a third of Georgia's registered voters have voted already by early or
>>>>> mail.
>>>>>
>>>>> <shrug>
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump will win. Harris has just not shown the decisiveness, the *ownership* of
>>>>> the office.
>>>>
>>>> I fear you might be correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> NP: Atlanta Rhythm Section - Georgia Rhythm
>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWRuhsWmSWY>
>>>
>>> Do you have a safe spot picked out? Or will you just enjoy the lower
>>> prices and closed border?
>>
>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if Trump
>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.
>>
>> On prices, if the CPI goes down without a recession, I'll send you $100:
>> care to show your sincerity by reciprocating the upside on this wager?
>>
>>
>> -hh
>>
>
> No bill needed.
> Just reinstate the Trump policies that Biden/Harris rescinded on day one,...

Just which Trump policy has survived Court rulings to make it legal?
Go ahead and list them.

> ... continue
> building the wall and add to it additional high tech monitoring and all
> would be fine.

And you're willing to pay how much more in income taxes to pay for what
you want? Put up a number.

>
> Why did Biden/Harris/Majorkas claim for 3.5 years that the border was secure?

Because CBP encounters were way up. CBP also reported that a lot of the
apprehensions were repeats ... the same guy, again & again. I could
look up the numbers, but my recollection is that something like 75% were
repeats.

> <https://thehill.com/opinion/immigration/4455506-breaking-down-the-senate-border-bill-and-why-it-has-no-chance-of-passing/>

No chance of passing isn't the same as saying if it would start to fix
the immigration problems or not. Try again.

-hh

On 11/4/24 6:47 PM, chrisv wrote:
> -hh wrote:
>
>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if Trump
>> hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be killed.
>
> The Biden administration "saw the light" a few months before the
> election, eh, -highhorse?
>
> Silly political games.
>
> Immigrations *surged* under their policies.
>

Golly, seems that someone has completely forgotten about how the
"Caravan" invasion was his campaign platform in 2016:

<https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-illegal-immigration-crisis-border-security/>

....and even though he said in 2018 that the laws were broken, he was
never able to pass legislation to get them fixed. Even for the two
years where the GOP had majorities in the House & Senate as well as
holding the White House.

And insofar as the post-CoVid "surge", the metric seen there is on CBP
encounters & arrests: those are the "caught", not the "slipped thru".

To know if illegal immigration actually increased, one needs to go find
and use the correct number, not the CBP encounters So let's see the
citation on the metric which actually supports your claim, for otherwise
you're just irresponsibly yammering again with YA unsubstantiated claim.

-hh

On 11/4/24 7:44 PM, Lil dwarf Rudey wrote:
> -hh wrote:
>> On 11/4/24 12:29 PM, Citizen Winston Smith wrote:
>>> On 11/4/2024 6:17 AM, -hh wrote:
>>>> Well, the border would have been restricted to just 5,000/month if
>>>> Trump hadn't ordered the bipartisan border deal legislation to be
>>>> killed.
>>>
>>> The legislation would have INCREASED illegal immigration, you lying
>>> demotarded cuntbag.
>>
>>
>> Really?
>
> Really.
>
> Now foad, traitor.

Oh, how cute: another person has come to this troll's aid.

You've now taken upon yourself what was his task:

"Cite that passage in the legislation. I'll wait."

-hh

NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>>>>As if we're going to forget the illegal action in Dobbs, and the fact
>>>>that electing Trump again could further pack the court, against
>>>>undoing it? Dream on, this is war.
>>>
>>>Yet it is the Democrats who have talked about oing court packing. How
>>>do libs get everything so backwards?
>>
>>You're a fucking idiot, that's the MSNBC-watching clowns, who think
>>that would work, it didn't happen, it never will happen, we will take
>>back the court by winning elections, it's a long road. Trump and
>>McConnell already *DID THIS* by cheating Obama and Biden out of
>>nominations, FUCK OFF, with your lying garbage, right-wing ape. Drop
>>dead.
>
>Uh huh.
>
>"During a forum in New Hampshire in May of 2020, a moderator asked
>Harris how she felt about adding as many as four seats to the Supreme
>Court. The then-senator from California said she was “open to this
>conversation.”
>
>Harris also signaled a desire to place restrictions on the amount of
>justices a president can appoint to the Court, and to end lifetime
>appointments for justices. These reforms and others would restore the
>Court’s legitimacy in the eyes of voters, she suggested."
>
>https://truthout.org/articles/harris-has-expressed-being-open-to-supreme-court-expansion/
>
>
>"
>
>Democrats are calling for the Supreme Court to be expanded after its
>conservative majority ruled that former presidents have broad immunity
>from prosecution."
>
>https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-move-expand-supreme-court-trump-ruling-1919976

Meanwhile, none of that is anything but vaporware, whereas the Gorsuch
and Barrett appointments were stolen. Have a nice day, when Trump
loses, with "Roevember".

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

In article <n57kijpqfujq244tei2lqj6ligmf3d927p@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>As if we're going to forget the illegal action in Dobbs, and the fact
> >>>>that electing Trump again could further pack the court, against
> >>>>undoing it? Dream on, this is war.
> >>>
> >>>Yet it is the Democrats who have talked about oing court packing. How
> >>>do libs get everything so backwards?
> >>
> >>You're a fucking idiot, that's the MSNBC-watching clowns, who think
> >>that would work, it didn't happen, it never will happen, we will take
> >>back the court by winning elections, it's a long road. Trump and
> >>McConnell already *DID THIS* by cheating Obama and Biden out of
> >>nominations, FUCK OFF, with your lying garbage, right-wing ape. Drop
> >>dead.
> >
> >Uh huh.
> >
> >"During a forum in New Hampshire in May of 2020, a moderator asked
> >Harris how she felt about adding as many as four seats to the Supreme
> >Court. The then-senator from California said she was ?open to this
> >conversation.?
> >
> >Harris also signaled a desire to place restrictions on the amount of
> >justices a president can appoint to the Court, and to end lifetime
> >appointments for justices. These reforms and others would restore the
> >Court?s legitimacy in the eyes of voters, she suggested."
> >
> >https://truthout.org/articles/harris-has-expressed-being-open-to-supreme-court-expansion/
> >
> >
> >"
> >
> >Democrats are calling for the Supreme Court to be expanded after its
> >conservative majority ruled that former presidents have broad immunity
> >from prosecution."
> >
> >https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-move-expand-supreme-court-trump-ruling-1919976
>
>
> Meanwhile, none of that is anything but vaporware, whereas the Gorsuch
> and Barrett appointments were stolen. Have a nice day, when Trump
> loses, with "Roevember".

Poofter.

On 2024-11-04, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
>>> Uh huh, dumbshit old white mother fucker, you wouldn't step to me with[out]
>>> your fucking guns, dummy. I could kick the crap out of you.
>>>
>>I would.
>>I'm just a girl with a red belt however looking at your scrawny picture on your
>>license, which you posted, and other places online, unless you were on some
>>huge meth trip with super human strength you would be neutralized in 30 seconds
>>or less.
>>And if not, my big brother, a recent black belt would quickly send your head up Uranus.
>>
>>Of course I am not a violent person and neither is my brother however both of us
>>are quite capable of defending ourselves against predators of all kinds.
>>As should you be as well.
>
>
> I've posted my images, name and location, and a bunch of anonymous
> pussies are threatening me, and not doing shit to make it real - I won
> by default. Enjoy it.
>
It's not my fault you are stupid as well.
BTW, I'm not threatening anyone. I'm a libertarian and believe in free speech.
I can't however control people who make stupid decisions.
Like you for example.

--
pothead

See Kamala Harris best interview ever.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363352689112
She really knocks this one out of the park.
Don't you agree?

"Skeeter" <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote in message
news:6728da4a$2$3620711$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com...
> In article <7gjhij5d1eqnsr44j9lbj57bda9ivbp7un@4ax.com>,
> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Nobody care wannabe keyboard warrior.
>>
>>
>> You're the one making it about "keyboard warrior", retard, but since
>> you did, come find me and get stomped.
>
> HAW HAW HAW
>
>
> I love making you act like a spoiled child.

yea, and the chances he wants you to actually show up at his house are zero.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jdjhij94sf6jh8j6lp8932rqbhpui6k36d@4ax.com...
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> >LOL, You of all people trying to act tough.
>>>
>>> Uh huh, dumbshit old white mother fucker, you wouldn't step to me with
>>> your fucking guns, dummy. I could kick the crap out of you.
>>
>>I have seen you. You couldn't fight your way out of a wet paper bag.
>
>
> You have seen nothing, retard. If you think my weight is the issue,
> you don't even know it, and you'd be wrong anyway, you're a fucking
> dumbshit pothead loser. I would mop the fucking floor with you, bring
> it on whenever, faggot. I double-dog dare your white ass.

The little dog that's all bark... that our Joel.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:48nhijhk5j7l6gsg27uq8q108nhg1s6hcf@4ax.com...
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> >> >LOL, You of all people trying to act tough.
>>> >>
>>> >> Uh huh, dumbshit old white mother fucker, you wouldn't step to me
>>> >> with
>>> >> your fucking guns, dummy. I could kick the crap out of you.
>>> >
>>> >I have seen you. You couldn't fight your way out of a wet paper bag.
>>>
>>> You have seen nothing, retard. If you think my weight is the issue,
>>> you don't even know it, and you'd be wrong anyway, you're a fucking
>>> dumbshit pothead loser. I would mop the fucking floor with you, bring
>>> it on whenever, faggot. I double-dog dare your white ass.
>>
>>You talk tough behind that screen. But we all know what a poofter you
>>are.
>
>
> You talk out of your ass, come find me, fuck around and find out, punk
> bitch.

Not exactly hard to do given you posted the information to find you.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fbphij5hi2fos7iac051ek0d6sp3cd6bsj@4ax.com...
> Rich <rich@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>>> You talk out of your ass, come find me, fuck around and find out, punk
>>> bitch.
>>>
>>You're a wimpy little faggot with a big mouth, Joleen.
>
>
> Then do something about it and get wrecked, pussy. I'd slap you and
> knock you out, don't make me laugh, retard.

Slapping? What are you? A wimpy gay man? Oh, that's right, you are!

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9o1iijlf1u3p4ajf33l66ib6anit0lod8p@4ax.com...
> Rich <rich@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>>> >> You talk out of your ass, come find me, fuck around and find out,
>>> >> punk
>>> >> bitch.
>>> >>
>>> >You're a wimpy little faggot with a big mouth, Joleen.
>>>
>>> Then do something about it
>>>
>>I am, I'm laughing at your keyboard tough guy act, you scrawny
>>little sissy.
>
>
> Then come at me, punk, but you won't, because you're all talk, you're
> a pussy-ass bitch. I'd rape your ugly-ass, bitch, Down Syndrome
> mother in the asshole, faggot retard.

You do remember that you posted information that would allow virtually
anyone to find you?
Are you really sure you want to call for them to find you and beat you up?

I mean if you were Rudy, I could understand your desire to be beaten up...

"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com> wrote
in message
news:tr4iij5iuiu712ho2a6b7g89fff836dltq@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>
>>Then come at me, punk, but you won't, because you're all talk, you're
>>a pussy-ass bitch. I'd rape your ugly-ass, bitch, Down Syndrome
>>mother in the asshole, faggot retard.
>
> ROFLMAO
>
> Looks like poor Joel's boyfriend ain't giving him any.

His boyfriend clearly hasn't spanked him enough.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1kkiij1aaesvol1b00eiennfbftph7aael@4ax.com...
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
>>> Uh huh, dumbshit old white mother fucker, you wouldn't step to me
>>> with[out]
>>> your fucking guns, dummy. I could kick the crap out of you.
>>>
>>I would.
>>I'm just a girl with a red belt however looking at your scrawny picture on
>>your
>>license, which you posted, and other places online, unless you were on
>>some
>>huge meth trip with super human strength you would be neutralized in 30
>>seconds
>>or less.
>>And if not, my big brother, a recent black belt would quickly send your
>>head up Uranus.
>>
>>Of course I am not a violent person and neither is my brother however both
>>of us
>>are quite capable of defending ourselves against predators of all kinds.
>>As should you be as well.
>
>
> I've posted my images, name and location, and a bunch of anonymous
> pussies are threatening me, and not doing shit to make it real - I won
> by default. Enjoy it.

Clearly Joel isn't being sexually abused enough by his current boyfriend.