GNU/Linux Video Extravaganza

For REAL MEN only

Alternative Browsers

If you think that you are man enough then join the party.

Otherwise, go strangle yourself in your Ubuntu tutu.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

Get it here (340 Mb):

For lackeys --

https://ufile.io/zux0rlug

For REAL MEN --

alt.binaries.multimedia.transformation

colavid.mp4

Can't miss it.

yEnc encoded

Diego Garcia <dg@chaos.rocks> wrote:

>GNU/Linux Video Extravaganza
>
>For REAL MEN only
>
>Alternative Browsers
>
>If you think that you are man enough then join the party.
>
>Otherwise, go strangle yourself in your Ubuntu tutu.
>
>Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
>Get it here (340 Mb):
>
>For lackeys --
>
>https://ufile.io/zux0rlug
>
>
>For REAL MEN --
>
>alt.binaries.multimedia.transformation
>
>colavid.mp4
>
>Can't miss it.
>
>yEnc encoded

https://i.imgur.com/LeIjQz0.png

So, I watched your insane video. I believe that you were a Marine, it
makes sense now, you're not a tweaker per se, you're a Marine. The
next Oswald, perhaps, if you weren't lying about all the abuse you
gave the M$ and Apple users in public. Your alternative browsers were
interesting to see, but not something I would use. I want Firefox,
Chrome and Edge, just as I had under Winblows. I don't have this
retarded obsession with being minimalist, that you have. You need
mental help.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Le 25-05-2024, Diego Garcia <dg@chaos.rocks> a écrit :
>
> colavid.mp4

Once again, thanks for the good laugh (in the beginning, I didn't looked
at everything because it becomes boring). With this video, you proved,
once again, that I'm ten times faster than you.

First, when you are writing the name of a directory in your terminal,
you should use your [TAB] key: it's faster and it would avoid you to
misspell it (and the need to write it a second time).

Second, why do you use a terminal to launch GUI applications? I know,
it's because you are unable to configure your menu. It shows because it
takes you forever to find your applications in it. You should learn how
to configure it.

I never launch a GUI program from a terminal because it's inefficient.
When you do it, you show me how I'm right about it.

When you launch your GUI applications from the terminal, you have two
issues. And that takes forever. The first one is you need to move it on
another workspace, you do it with your mouse and it's slow (and when you
loose the focus and interact with another application, it's fun to see
how you struggle to do basic things). And second, when your application
is on your right workspace, you need to resize it. Which takes you
forever a second time.

When you launch something every day, it should be very fast and your way
is very slow. I don't need a mouse driven menu, but for a GUI lackey
like you, you should configure it to suit your needs and to be
efficient.

You would have the support of the -highthorse here because he will say
that the professional designers who provided you the menu know better
than you how you should use your computer. But he's a brain dead moron
unable to see how your use of tools designed by others is inefficient,
so it doesn't count.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

On 5/25/2024 12:48 PM, Diego Garcia wrote:
> GNU/Linux Video Extravaganza
>
> For REAL MEN only
>
> Alternative Browsers
>
> If you think that you are man enough then join the party.
>
> Otherwise, go strangle yourself in your Ubuntu tutu.
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
> Get it here (340 Mb):
>
> For lackeys --
>
> https://ufile.io/zux0rlug

1. At 2:31 you babbled "What the fuck's going on here?"

Now THAT is the story of your life.

2. "I have a New/Linux job".

No, you don't.

3. Your 'favorite New/Linux image viewer' xzgv can't sort files
correctly.

Failure and incompetence is the story of GuhNoo's life

4. "I use New/Linux exclusively!"

Except for the 8 hrs per day you do real work for money on MS Windows.

5. 8:21 It's funny to see the horrible screen tearing and garbling
your crappy GuhNoo hobbyware produces, all throughout the
video.

6. "Let this little boy wet his whistle!"

cover the mic so we don't have to hear the nauseating sound of your gulping

7. Links browser

tagline:
"EVERY webpage looks like shit on Links! Download it here!"

asian nude galleries.
You got quiet and started mumbling and jacking off right then.
disgusting. But at least you get credit for being straight. Most
Linux users are raging homos.

electromagnetic propagation (wikipedia)
"link: modulepreload" repeated 1000x... MS is doomed.

8. Dillo browser

tagline:
"Webpages don't look as shitty on Dillo as they do on Links, but they do
look shitty! Download Dillo here!"

asian nude galleries.
You picked an emaciated one that has a 'little boy' body like you.
Then you got quiet again and started mumbling, then burst out "suck my
cock!"

electromagnetic propagation (wikipedia)
looks like crap

9. Pan newsreader on GTK3 toolkit

black on green nit.

looks like that on Pan/Windows, too

10. mhWaveEdit on GTK2

"New/Linux only!" As it should be. No self-respecting Windows user
would run that crap.

https://github.com/magnush/mhwaveedit/blob/master/AUTHORS

That piece of barebones GuhNoo junk is the work of 19 FOSS hobby
developers? 19 ?!?!?!?!

Get a real sound editing app for free (like most good application
software, it's not available for Linux):

https://www.nch.com.au/wavepad/index.html

https://imgur.com/a/X0b6cqV

Again and again and again you promote literally the worst apps in the
world. Where's your dignity?

11. terminate the video with insults and babbling and that ridiculous
laughing "woah ho ho ho woah ho ho ho"

"Let this little boy wet his whistle!" followed by gulping sounds
"Let this little boy wet his whistle!" followed by gulping sounds
"2..1..terminate"

> For REAL MEN --
>
> alt.binaries.multimedia.transformation
>
> colavid.mp4
>
> Can't miss it.
>
> yEnc encoded

The User-Agent string of your abmt posts says:

Russell News 5.0 GNU/Linux

But we know that's a bullshit lie, because a technical incompetent like
you could NEVER program your own yenc-enabled newsreader. You actually
used:

Newspost/2.1.1

available at http://newspost.unixcab.org/

Another post, another lie by the lying fraud.

DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:

>Get a real sound editing app for free (like most good application
>software, it's not available for Linux):

https://www.audacityteam.org/

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Sat, 25 May 2024 14:06:32 -0400, Joel wrote:

> I don't have this retarded obsession with being minimalist, that you
> have.

It goes with the Marine thing. Uncle Sam's Misguided Children were always
the last to get new toys. Sometimes that worked out well. When you're
trying to hit a jihadi at 800 yards having a stash of M14s helps.

On Sat, 25 May 2024 17:49:11 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in
<k5n45jl8396vi7c9bm7ta5a5t3iqqf2am9@4ax.com>:

> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>
>>Get a real sound editing app for free (like most good application
>>software, it's not available for Linux):
>
>
> https://www.audacityteam.org/

Agreed -- and the fact that Furled Fart didn't think to use
Audacity only indicates the depth of his stupidity.

--
-v

On Sat, 25 May 2024 17:43:09 -0400, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in
<66525b6c$0$7171$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> On 5/25/2024 12:48 PM, Diego Garcia wrote:
>> GNU/Linux Video Extravaganza
>>
>> For REAL MEN only
>>
>> Alternative Browsers
>>
>> If you think that you are man enough then join the party.
>>
>> Otherwise, go strangle yourself in your Ubuntu tutu.
>>
>> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>>
>> Get it here (340 Mb):
>>
>> For lackeys --
>>
>> https://ufile.io/zux0rlug
>
>
> 1. At 2:31 you babbled "What the fuck's going on here?"
>
> Now THAT is the story of your life.
>
>
>
> 2. "I have a New/Linux job".
>
> No, you don't.
>
>
> 3. Your 'favorite New/Linux image viewer' xzgv can't sort files
> correctly.
>
> Failure and incompetence is the story of GuhNoo's life
>
>
> 4. "I use New/Linux exclusively!"
>
> Except for the 8 hrs per day you do real work for money on MS Windows.
>
>
> 5. 8:21 It's funny to see the horrible screen tearing and garbling
> your crappy GuhNoo hobbyware produces, all throughout the
> video.
>
>
> 6. "Let this little boy wet his whistle!"
>
> cover the mic so we don't have to hear the nauseating sound of your gulping
>
>
> 7. Links browser
>
> tagline:
> "EVERY webpage looks like shit on Links! Download it here!"
>
>
> asian nude galleries.
> You got quiet and started mumbling and jacking off right then.
> disgusting. But at least you get credit for being straight. Most
> Linux users are raging homos.
>
> electromagnetic propagation (wikipedia)
> "link: modulepreload" repeated 1000x... MS is doomed.
>
>
> 8. Dillo browser
>
> tagline:
> "Webpages don't look as shitty on Dillo as they do on Links, but they do
> look shitty! Download Dillo here!"
>
>
> asian nude galleries.
> You picked an emaciated one that has a 'little boy' body like you.
> Then you got quiet again and started mumbling, then burst out "suck my
> cock!"
>
> electromagnetic propagation (wikipedia)
> looks like crap
>
>
> 9. Pan newsreader on GTK3 toolkit
>
> black on green nit.
>
> looks like that on Pan/Windows, too
>
>
>
> 10. mhWaveEdit on GTK2
>
> "New/Linux only!" As it should be. No self-respecting Windows user
> would run that crap.
>
> https://github.com/magnush/mhwaveedit/blob/master/AUTHORS
>
> That piece of barebones GuhNoo junk is the work of 19 FOSS hobby
> developers? 19 ?!?!?!?!
>
>
> Get a real sound editing app for free (like most good application
> software, it's not available for Linux):
>
> https://www.nch.com.au/wavepad/index.html
>
> https://imgur.com/a/X0b6cqV
>
> Again and again and again you promote literally the worst apps in the
> world. Where's your dignity?
>
>
>
>
> 11. terminate the video with insults and babbling and that ridiculous
> laughing "woah ho ho ho woah ho ho ho"
>
> "Let this little boy wet his whistle!" followed by gulping sounds
> "Let this little boy wet his whistle!" followed by gulping sounds
> "2..1..terminate"
>
>
>
>
>> For REAL MEN --
>>
>> alt.binaries.multimedia.transformation
>>
>> colavid.mp4
>>
>> Can't miss it.
>>
>> yEnc encoded
>
>
> The User-Agent string of your abmt posts says:
>
> Russell News 5.0 GNU/Linux
>
> But we know that's a bullshit lie, because a technical incompetent like
> you could NEVER program your own yenc-enabled newsreader. You actually
> used:
>
> Newspost/2.1.1
>
> available at http://newspost.unixcab.org/
>
>
> Another post, another lie by the lying fraud.

I scrubbed through the video, skipping over the 10+
minutes of violent fantasies in coffee shops.

(If he's not on a watch list, he oughta be.)

Regarding the Linux "prowess": he doesn't
appear to be comfortable with the command-line
environment.

He also doesn't seem to use any kind of scoring
in Pan. AND, we now have confirmation that he's using
pan _from his distro_, like the distro-lackey he is(!).

--
-v

Le 25-05-2024, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> a écrit :
> 7. Links browser
>
> tagline:
> "EVERY webpage looks like shit on Links! Download it here!"

In fact, you are confused because you are answering to someone who doesn't
understand the purpose of links and who doesn't know how to use it. Links
is great, it's not its fault if LP/DG/FR/NV/whatever doesn't understand
its purpose. You should know that by now.

The purpose of links is not to be launched in graphical mode. Its
purpose is to be used in a terminal. And does its job pretty well. There
are some cases where you have no graphical mode available and you need
to browse the Internet. At this time, you are happy to be able to use
links.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

Le 25-05-2024, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> a écrit :
>
> I scrubbed through the video, skipping over the 10+
> minutes of violent fantasies in coffee shops.
>
> (If he's not on a watch list, he oughta be.)

No, he wouldn't dare to do anything. Any women here would have kicked is
ass if he tried.

> Regarding the Linux "prowess": he doesn't
> appear to be comfortable with the command-line
> environment.

He's comfortable with nothing. He avoid the command line as most as
possible because it's too difficult for him. He's using it only when he
can't manage the GUI.

When he's using his graphical tool to see the pictures, it's obvious
he's comfortable with nothing. Everything is wrong with his way of doing
it. It's impressive how he can systematically find the worst way of
doing things.

When I'm telling him I'm ten time faster than him to do anything, it's
because his previous videos reflect the same issues. And I'm pretty
confident anyone comfortable with Linux would be faster than him.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

On 25 May 2024 21:13:23 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

>
> in the beginning...
>

In the beginning it demands that all the non-REAL MEN leave the
premises? Why didn't you leave? Huh?

The vid is made for REAL MEN. That's not you.

>
> Second, why do you use a terminal to launch GUI applications? I know,
> it's because you are unable to configure your menu. It shows because it
> takes you forever to find your applications in it. You should learn how
> to configure it.
>

Wrong again.

Executing a program from a terminal that is parked at a certain
directory allows the program, in this case an image viewer, to
immediately load all the files in that directory.

If the program were invoked via a menu, it would be parked at
the home or some other directory. Thus, one would have to navigate
to the desired directory that contains the images and this
would be very, very slow.

Again you show yourself to be an idiot.

>
> I never launch a GUI program from a terminal because it's inefficient.
> When you do it, you show me how I'm right about it.
>

Launching a GUI program from a terminal is very beneficial because
diagnostic and other messages are printed to the console. Thus
one can easily see if there are any problems with the software or its
environment.

Of course, this applies only to GNU/Linux gurus, like me, who actually
build their own systems.

But YOU are a distro lackey and have everything built for you by other
people. Therefore you have no need for diagnostic messages.

On 2024-05-25, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
> Le 25-05-2024, Diego Garcia <dg@chaos.rocks> a écrit :
>>
>> colavid.mp4
>
> Once again, thanks for the good laugh (in the beginning, I didn't looked
> at everything because it becomes boring). With this video, you proved,
> once again, that I'm ten times faster than you.
>
> First, when you are writing the name of a directory in your terminal,
> you should use your [TAB] key: it's faster and it would avoid you to
> misspell it (and the need to write it a second time).
>
> Second, why do you use a terminal to launch GUI applications? I know,
> it's because you are unable to configure your menu. It shows because it
> takes you forever to find your applications in it. You should learn how
> to configure it.
>
> I never launch a GUI program from a terminal because it's inefficient.
> When you do it, you show me how I'm right about it.
>
> When you launch your GUI applications from the terminal, you have two
> issues. And that takes forever. The first one is you need to move it on
> another workspace, you do it with your mouse and it's slow (and when you
> loose the focus and interact with another application, it's fun to see
> how you struggle to do basic things). And second, when your application
> is on your right workspace, you need to resize it. Which takes you
> forever a second time.
>
> When you launch something every day, it should be very fast and your way
> is very slow. I don't need a mouse driven menu, but for a GUI lackey
> like you, you should configure it to suit your needs and to be
> efficient.
>
> You would have the support of the -highthorse here because he will say
> that the professional designers who provided you the menu know better
> than you how you should use your computer. But he's a brain dead moron
> unable to see how your use of tools designed by others is inefficient,
> so it doesn't count.

I don't use the mouse to launch GUI applications from the terminal. If I
want to open a Trelby document (as an example) I do the following.

Shift-Control-M to open a terminal

.. trel _name_

And I'm editing my file.

If I don't know the name of the document I want to edit, I run...

lst trel

....and all my Trelby documents are listed.

If I want to start a new document...

.. trel _newname_

And I'm editing the document.

trel shell script

#!/bin/bash
clear
trelby ~/Documents/scripts/$1.trelby 2>/dev/null &
exit

The lst script is relatively long because I use it for several different
file extensions (some with more than one option and some in specific
directories).

case $1 in
txt)
echo "--------------------"
ls *.txt
echo "--------------------"
;;
ltxt)
echo "--------------------"
ls -tl *.txt
echo "--------------------"
;;
n)
echo "--------------------"
ls -pB | grep -v \\. | grep -v /
echo "--------------------"
;;
pdf)
echo "--------------------"
ls *.pdf
echo "--------------------"
;;
lpdf)
echo "--------------------"
ls -tlr *.pdf
echo "--------------------"
;;
trel)
echo "--------------------"
ls *.trelby
echo "--------------------"
;;
a)
echo "--------------------"
ls --color
echo "--------------------"
;;
fount)
echo "--------------------"
ls *.fountain
echo "--------------------"
;;
lfount)
echo "--------------------"
ls -tlr *.fountain
echo "--------------------"
;;
fdx)
echo "--------------------"
ls *.fdx
echo "--------------------"
;;
html)
echo "--------------------"
ls *.html
echo "--------------------"
;;
fade)
echo "--------------------"
ls -tlr *.fadein
echo "--------------------"
;;
note)
echo "--------------------"
cd ~/Documents/notes
ls *.txt
echo "--------------------"
;;
doc)
echo "--------------------"
cd ~/Documents/docs
ls *.txt
echo "--------------------"
;;
adoc)
echo "--------------------"
cd ~/Documents/html
ls *.adoc
echo "--------------------"
ls *.html
echo "--------------------"
;;
d)
echo "--------------------"
cd ~/Documents/words
ls *.txt
echo "--------------------"
;;
j)
echo "--------------------"
cd ~/afterlabs
ls *.json
echo "--------------------"
;;
tel)
echo "---------------------"
cd ~/Documents/tel
ls *.txt
echo "---------------------"
;;
*)
echo "--------------------"
echo "No match"
echo "--------------------"
;;
esac

--
[Self-centered, Woke] "pride is a life of self-destructive fakery, an
entrapment to a false and self-created matrix of twisted unreality."
"It was pride that changed angels into devils..." — St. Augustine

Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> <brevsnip>
>
> I never launch a GUI program from a terminal because it's inefficient.
> When you do it, you show me how I'm right about it.

Heh, I rarely start a GUI from anything but the command line.

> When you launch your GUI applications from the terminal, you have two
> issues. And that takes forever. The first one is you need to move it on
> another workspace, you do it with your mouse and it's slow (and when you
> loose the focus and interact with another application, it's fun to see
> how you struggle to do basic things). And second, when your application
> is on your right workspace, you need to resize it. Which takes you
> forever a second time.

Heh, most WM's will let you do all that with keystrokes.

> When you launch something every day, it should be very fast and your way
> is very slow. I don't need a mouse driven menu, but for a GUI lackey
> like you, you should configure it to suit your needs and to be
> efficient.

I set up some Fluxbox menus, but also hot-keys for my most frequent actions.
I do like Fluxbox's menu navigation, though. Super-M P P, for example.
Super-M brings up the desktop menu, P selects my personal sub-menu, and
P then selects Power Off.

Or I can type pow<tab> from a terminal.

But this is stock stuff, anybody who spends much time on Linux will find their
best way to do things.

--
It is so very hard to be an
on-your-own-take-care-of-yourself-because-there-is-no-one-else-to-do-it-for-you
grown-up.

Farley Flud wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> <brevsnip>
>
> Executing a program from a terminal that is parked at a certain
> directory allows the program, in this case an image viewer, to
> immediately load all the files in that directory.

Another nice little utility is cdargs.

> If the program were invoked via a menu, it would be parked at
> the home or some other directory. Thus, one would have to navigate
> to the desired directory that contains the images and this
> would be very, very slow.
>
> <insult snip>
>
> Launching a GUI program from a terminal is very beneficial because
> diagnostic and other messages are printed to the console. Thus
> one can easily see if there are any problems with the software or its
> environment.
>
> <boast snip>
>
> <insult snip>

--
A is for Apple.
-- Hester Pryne

Le 26-05-2024, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :
> On 25 May 2024 21:13:23 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
>> in the beginning...
>
> In the beginning it demands that all the non-REAL MEN leave the
> premises? Why didn't you leave? Huh?

It wasn't a real premise. Because you wouldn't be there, so there
wouldn't have been any video.

> The vid is made for REAL MEN. That's not you.

You wouldn't recognise a real man if you meet one one day. You are only
a barking dog.

>> Second, why do you use a terminal to launch GUI applications? I know,
>> it's because you are unable to configure your menu. It shows because it
>> takes you forever to find your applications in it. You should learn how
>> to configure it.
>>
>
> Wrong again.

Everything I wrote is right. You proved it in you next sentences.

> Executing a program from a terminal that is parked at a certain
> directory allows the program, in this case an image viewer, to
> immediately load all the files in that directory.

OK, let say it another way: "xzgv ~/Desktop" is three times more
efficient than "cd ~/DEsktop" then "cd ~Desktop" then "xzgv &". And then
you have to use your mouse to resize xzgv which halves the efficiency
once again. And finally, you have to use your mouse once again to select
your images. Which is very slaow. If I wanted to get the same result,
I'd do "feh ~/De[TAB][ENTER]" which is ten times faster than you. Or I
could do "ranger ~/De[TAB][ENTER]" with the same effect, but with the
ability to move more easily in my directories.

And I'm not speaking about your stupid choice of "~/Desktop" to store
your images.

> If the program were invoked via a menu, it would be parked at
> the home or some other directory.

Why? You don't manage what you put on your menus? So, it's exactly what
I wrote before, which was right: "you are using your terminal because
you are unable to configure your menus".

> Thus, one would have to navigate to the desired directory that
> contains the images and this would be very, very slow.

First: you are slow, so you wouldn't realize it.
Second: when you do "cd ~/Desktop", you navigate to the desired
directory that contains the images.
Third: why didn't you used midnight commander as you said it was the
best? I answered you midnight commander is too heavy compare to cd and
you answered me I can't you the old good tools. But the fact is: you
can't use it neither.
Fourth: I'm ten times faster with feh than you with xzgv, so either feh
is ten times better than xzgz or you are unable to manage correctly
xzgv. In both cases, you are unable to chose the right tools, so what
you say is funny, but as advise they are crap.

> Again you show yourself to be an idiot.

It's not a new thing. But you are ten times stupider than me, you
shouldn't be proud about it.

>> I never launch a GUI program from a terminal because it's inefficient.
>> When you do it, you show me how I'm right about it.
>
> Launching a GUI program from a terminal is very beneficial because
> diagnostic and other messages are printed to the console.

So, why didn't you launched links and pan from your terminal? Because
you don't know how to do it. So, once again what I wrote was right.

If you care about diagnostic messages, why didn't you do anything about
the messages printed by dillo? Because you don't know how to handle
them? Because unlike your claims you don't care about them?

So, either you launch everything from the menu, or you launch everything
from the terminal or you launch your applications from the terminal only
when requested and take care of the displayed messages. Your choice. But
your usage show you don't know when, why and how use your terminal to
launch programs. So, you are a clown, you are funny and that's all that
matter.

DFS says you live in your mom basement, but I'd rather guess you live in
an asylum.

> Of course, this applies only to GNU/Linux gurus, like me, who actually
> build their own systems.

You build nothing. You pretend to, it's not the same. If you did built
your own system, there wouldn't be any "~/Desktop" menu on it. It exists
only because it has been created on your back. You don't know how, you
don't know why and you don't understand its purpose.

In your video, you blame freedesktop, but they are there only to provide
guidelines and way to manage interacting applications. If you don't want
to follow their rules, you just don't. The fact that some things are
done behind your back show you manage nothing.

> But YOU are a distro lackey and have everything built for you by other
> people.

Of course I use things done by others. I have no time to do things
others already did. And everything you show is done by others. You
didn't launched anything done by you. Your applications are created by
others. Your menu is configured by others. Even your directories are
created by others. You are a GUI lackey dreaming of learning the basic
skills to manage his computer.

> Therefore you have no need for diagnostic messages.

Not in a day to day basis. When I'm using a program every day, I don't
expect it to crash regularly. Or I would chose another one. Its purpose
is only in an extraordinary usage. Which is not what you tried to show.

And as you didn't do anything about dillo messages, you have no need
for them neither, and, once again, your claims are crap.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

Le 26-05-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :
> On 2024-05-25, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
>>
>> I never launch a GUI program from a terminal because it's inefficient.
>> When you do it, you show me how I'm right about it.
>>
>> When you launch your GUI applications from the terminal, you have two
>> issues. And that takes forever. The first one is you need to move it on
>> another workspace, you do it with your mouse and it's slow (and when you
>> loose the focus and interact with another application, it's fun to see
>> how you struggle to do basic things). And second, when your application
>> is on your right workspace, you need to resize it. Which takes you
>> forever a second time.
>
> I don't use the mouse to launch GUI applications from the terminal. If I
> want to open a Trelby document (as an example) I do the following.
> [...]
> If I don't know the name of the document I want to edit, I run...

If I had a script like that, I wouldn't launch it from a terminal. I'd
launch it from a keystroke with the help of wofi. Something like when I
want to see a pdf file:
bindsym $mod+z exec find ~ \( -path ~/Download\* -o -path ~/divers\* -o -path ~/Lecture/Pdf/ALire/\* \) -a \( -name "*.pdf" -o -name "*.ps" -o -name "*.epub" \) 2>/dev/null | wofi -d | xargs -r -I % zathura "%"

When I press [Windows]+[z], there is find who will look for my pdf
files, open the list in wofi and wofi open the one I select in zathura.

Wofi, rofi are dmenu are very good to launch graphical applications
without the need to open a terminal.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

On 5/26/2024 10:14 AM, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

> bindsym $mod+z exec find ~ \( -path ~/Download\* -o -path ~/divers\* -o -path ~/Lecture/Pdf/ALire/\* \) -a \( -name "*.pdf" -o -name "*.ps" -o -name "*.epub" \) 2>/dev/null | wofi -d | xargs -r -I % zathura "%"

Grandma loves the command line.

On 5/25/2024 6:53 PM, vallor wrote:
> On Sat, 25 May 2024 17:43:09 -0400, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote in
> <66525b6c$0$7171$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
>> On 5/25/2024 12:48 PM, Diego Garcia wrote:
>>> GNU/Linux Video Extravaganza

<snip>

> I scrubbed through the video, skipping over the 10+
> minutes of violent fantasies in coffee shops.

He actually indulged in the fantasies of a powerless, vengeful, incel,
GuhNoo weenie for more than 20 minutes.

> (If he's not on a watch list, he oughta be.)

If you wanna fuck with Feeb (Larry Pietraskiewicz), report him to Don
Shipley, who specializes in making phony Navy Seals famous.

> Regarding the Linux "prowess": he doesn't
> appear to be comfortable with the command-line
> environment.

Looks like he launches most apps from his GUI desktop.

> He also doesn't seem to use any kind of scoring
> in Pan. AND, we now have confirmation that he's using
> pan _from his distro_, like the distro-lackey he is(!).

heh! 'distro lackey' is kind of funny.

Diego Garcia <dg@chaos.rocks> wrote at 16:48 this Saturday (GMT):
> GNU/Linux Video Extravaganza
>
> For REAL MEN only
>
> Alternative Browsers
>
> If you think that you are man enough then join the party.
>
> Otherwise, go strangle yourself in your Ubuntu tutu.
>
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
>
> Get it here (340 Mb):
>
> For lackeys --
>
> https://ufile.io/zux0rlug
>
>
> For REAL MEN --
>
> alt.binaries.multimedia.transformation
>
> colavid.mp4
>
> Can't miss it.
>
> yEnc encoded

Sorry, e-s doesn't carry the binary groups.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote at 08:21 this Sunday (GMT):
> Le 25-05-2024, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> a écrit :
>> 7. Links browser
>>
>> tagline:
>> "EVERY webpage looks like shit on Links! Download it here!"
>
> In fact, you are confused because you are answering to someone who doesn't
> understand the purpose of links and who doesn't know how to use it. Links
> is great, it's not its fault if LP/DG/FR/NV/whatever doesn't understand
> its purpose. You should know that by now.
>
> The purpose of links is not to be launched in graphical mode. Its
> purpose is to be used in a terminal. And does its job pretty well. There
> are some cases where you have no graphical mode available and you need
> to browse the Internet. At this time, you are happy to be able to use
> links.

Like when your X11 breaks!
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote at 21:49 this Saturday (GMT):
> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>
>>Get a real sound editing app for free (like most good application
>>software, it's not available for Linux):
>
>
> https://www.audacityteam.org/

Audacity is the industry standard, right?
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote at 21:13 this Saturday (GMT):
> Le 25-05-2024, Diego Garcia <dg@chaos.rocks> a écrit :
>>
>> colavid.mp4
>
> Once again, thanks for the good laugh (in the beginning, I didn't looked
> at everything because it becomes boring). With this video, you proved,
> once again, that I'm ten times faster than you.
>
> First, when you are writing the name of a directory in your terminal,
> you should use your [TAB] key: it's faster and it would avoid you to
> misspell it (and the need to write it a second time).
>
> Second, why do you use a terminal to launch GUI applications? I know,
> it's because you are unable to configure your menu. It shows because it
> takes you forever to find your applications in it. You should learn how
> to configure it.

Could also be a $PATH issue. I know I had to launch some programs from
the terminal until I learned about .xsessionrc because Debian doesn't
add $HOME/.local/bin for some reason.

And extra diagnostic info is nice.

> I never launch a GUI program from a terminal because it's inefficient.
> When you do it, you show me how I'm right about it.
>
> When you launch your GUI applications from the terminal, you have two
> issues. And that takes forever. The first one is you need to move it on
> another workspace, you do it with your mouse and it's slow (and when you
> loose the focus and interact with another application, it's fun to see
> how you struggle to do basic things). And second, when your application
> is on your right workspace, you need to resize it. Which takes you
> forever a second time.
>
> When you launch something every day, it should be very fast and your way
> is very slow. I don't need a mouse driven menu, but for a GUI lackey
> like you, you should configure it to suit your needs and to be
> efficient.
>
> You would have the support of the -highthorse here because he will say
> that the professional designers who provided you the menu know better
> than you how you should use your computer. But he's a brain dead moron
> unable to see how your use of tools designed by others is inefficient,
> so it doesn't count.

I'd recommend rofi for a simple launcher.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
wrote:
>Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote at 21:49 this Saturday (GMT):
>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Get a real sound editing app for free (like most good application
>>>software, it's not available for Linux):
>>
>> https://www.audacityteam.org/
>
>Audacity is the industry standard, right?

It's certainly what I would use, I took the moment of looking at it to
get the AppImage, in fact, because Mint's copy of it was outdated.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote at 00:01 this Monday (GMT):
> candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
> wrote:
>>Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote at 21:49 this Saturday (GMT):
>>> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Get a real sound editing app for free (like most good application
>>>>software, it's not available for Linux):
>>>
>>> https://www.audacityteam.org/
>>
>>Audacity is the industry standard, right?
>
>
> It's certainly what I would use, I took the moment of looking at it to
> get the AppImage, in fact, because Mint's copy of it was outdated.

Is it too old to use?
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
wrote:

>>>> https://www.audacityteam.org/
>>>
>>>Audacity is the industry standard, right?
>>
>> It's certainly what I would use, I took the moment of looking at it to
>> get the AppImage, in fact, because Mint's copy of it was outdated.
>
>Is it too old to use?

I doubt that, but why not use the latest version?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.