Message-ID:

Q: What do you call a blind, deaf-mute, quadraplegic Virginian? A: Trustworthy.

comp / comp.os.linux.advocacy / Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?

Subject: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
From: Nux Vomica
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:45 UTC

From: nv@linux.rocks (Nux Vomica)
Subject: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <pan$65c64$d7c347b$70e64aaf$48b6329f@linux.rocks>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 15
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!nntp.comgw.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.usenetexpress.com!not-for-mail
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:45:56 +0000
Nntp-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:45:56 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 828
Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetexpress.com

View all headers

Why no GNU/Linux women? I'll tell you fucking why.

Computer science was made by MEN for MEN.

Women, with their child-bearing intellectual organization,
cannot ever fathom the intricacies and subtleties of computer
programming.

Programming was/is an art/science made by MEN for MEN.

All those who disagree are not MEN but PUSSIES.

--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
From: Chris Ahlstrom
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Organization: None
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 20:27 UTC
References: 1

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: OFeem1987@teleworm.us (Chris Ahlstrom)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:27:53 -0400
Organization: None
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <vfeaks$2pc8c$4@dont-email.me>
References: <pan$65c64$d7c347b$70e64aaf$48b6329f@linux.rocks>
Reply-To: OFeem1987@teleworm.us
Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 22:28:13 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0e95730a4005f7be534f96a86c610916";
logging-data="2928908"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18cAjO8xqnrrJZk3QXvU9GX"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YmooJU59P1x2bYAcdcBr21S667A=
X-User-Agent: Microsoft Outl00k, Usenet K00k Editions
X-Mutt: The most widely-used MUA
X-Face: 63n<76,LYJQ2m#'5YL#.T95xqyPiG`ffIP70tN+j"(&@6(4l\7uL)2+/-r0)/9SjZ`qw=
Njn mr93Xrerx}aQG-Ap5IHn"xe;`5:pp"$RH>Kx_ngWw%c\+6qSg!q"41n2[.N/;Pu6q8?+Poz~e
A9? $6_R7cm.l!s8]yfv7x+-FYQ|/k
X-Slrn: Why use anything else?

View all headers

Nux Vomica wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Why no GNU/Linux women? I'll tell you fucking why.

You scared them all off.

--
Air pollution is really making us pay through the nose.

Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Programmers named Larry Piet?
From: DFS
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 22:59 UTC
References: 1

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca (DFS)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Programmers named Larry Piet?
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 18:59:30 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 95
Message-ID: <vfejgg$2qa7c$4@dont-email.me>
References: <pan$65c64$d7c347b$70e64aaf$48b6329f@linux.rocks>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:59:28 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b3df1a81e83a773dd67dbb162078396f";
logging-data="2959596"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+NAmxNAwQp2ddjclO5WwPz"
User-Agent: Betterbird (Windows)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YdznpE/ov2MtCH71sIor6ncYpyA=
In-Reply-To: <pan$65c64$d7c347b$70e64aaf$48b6329f@linux.rocks>
Content-Language: en-US

View all headers

On 10/24/2024 3:45 PM, Ludicrous Larry Piet wrote:

> Why no GNU/Linux women? I'll tell you fucking why.

uh oh... it's another No Titty Thursday in Feeb's lonely household.

Q: Why No GNU/Linux Programmers named Larry Piet?
A: He's a talentless freak.

> Computer science was made by MEN for MEN.

It was made by everyone for everyone.

> Women, with their child-bearing intellectual organization,
> cannot ever fathom the intricacies and subtleties of computer
> programming.

Of course they can.

> Programming was/is an art/science made by MEN for MEN.

You still SUCK at it.

> All those who disagree are not MEN but PUSSIES.

Spoken like a jealous, ignorant, incel loser that can't land a
programming job.

Worldwide, about:
20% of programmers are women.
80% of programmers are men.
0% of programmers are Feeb.

I come across accomplished, educated female computer science professors
ALL THE TIME when looking at CS curriculums:

ETH Zurich
https://ethz.ch/en/news-and-events/eth-news/news/2024/09/fifteen-professors-appointed.html

UC Berkeley
https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Faculty/Homepages/schasins.html

CalTech
http://users.cms.caltech.edu/~klbouman/

Princeton
https://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/fall19/cos217/

MIT
https://pmg.csail.mit.edu/~liskov/

Wayne State University
https://engineering.wayne.edu/profile/gp7532

The female computer scientist Radia Perlman wrote a nice little ditty:
----------------------------------------
Algorhyme
I think that I shall never see
A graph more lovely than a tree.

A tree whose crucial property
Is loop-free connectivity.

A tree which must be sure to span
So packets can reach every LAN.

First the root must be selected.
By ID it is elected.

Least cost paths from root are traced.
In the tree these paths are placed.

A mesh is made by folks like me
Then bridges find a spanning tree.
----------------------------------------

Finally, we all know you kiss female professor's and female scientist's
asses up and down in real life.

GFIA

Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
From: candycanearter07
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:10 UTC
References: 1

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:10:06 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <slrnvhnn7i.2ou1.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <pan$65c64$d7c347b$70e64aaf$48b6329f@linux.rocks>
Injection-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 20:10:06 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c888727e652c6f0f842ad30fb4e9232d";
logging-data="3460609"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Od0/h3hkZTje9dsspc3MBmE1MN1QQAMGePQaqrwy4/w=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qe4kaoX3w/MQhCc/qfEMrx49UqI=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
`~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D

View all headers

Nux Vomica <nv@linux.rocks> wrote at 19:45 this Thursday (GMT):
> Why no GNU/Linux women? I'll tell you fucking why.
>
> Computer science was made by MEN for MEN.
>
> Women, with their child-bearing intellectual organization,
> cannot ever fathom the intricacies and subtleties of computer
> programming.
>
> Programming was/is an art/science made by MEN for MEN.
>
> All those who disagree are not MEN but PUSSIES.

I know some.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
From: Joel
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 18:36 UTC
References: 1 2

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joelcrump@gmail.com (Joel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:36:40 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <g7pnhjhdffkc4dpktrbptv3q3tur1u82f8@4ax.com>
References: <pan$65c64$d7c347b$70e64aaf$48b6329f@linux.rocks> <slrnvhnn7i.2ou1.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 20:36:43 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="183e359049f87b83936f5af45b344efd";
logging-data="3468329"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+G1P8mg+Ed6YHd+d7qG3WUjFqWo+r43P0="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:clp1KGzh8THv64WgxhKDlW5qpyo=
OS: Debian 12, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI

View all headers

candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
wrote:
>Nux Vomica <nv@linux.rocks> wrote at 19:45 this Thursday (GMT):
>
>> Why no GNU/Linux women? I'll tell you fucking why.
>>
>> Computer science was made by MEN for MEN.
>>
>> Women, with their child-bearing intellectual organization,
>> cannot ever fathom the intricacies and subtleties of computer
>> programming.
>>
>> Programming was/is an art/science made by MEN for MEN.
>>
>> All those who disagree are not MEN but PUSSIES.
>
>I know some.

You mean, Larry was talking out of his butthole, again, say it ain't
so! Yeah, you are the future of Linux computing, he's a drain-bamaged
monkey boy.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
From: Stéphane CARPENTIER
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Organization: Mulots' Killer
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 19:50 UTC
References: 1

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed2-b.proxad.net!nnrp6-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: sc@fiat-linux.fr (Stéphane CARPENTIER)
Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
References: <pan$65c64$d7c347b$70e64aaf$48b6329f@linux.rocks>
Organization: Mulots' Killer
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 25 Oct 2024 19:50:47 GMT
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <671bf697$0$16813$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Oct 2024 21:50:47 CEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.201.248.7
X-Trace: 1729885847 news-2.free.fr 16813 78.201.248.7:51594
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net

View all headers

Le 24-10-2024, Nux Vomica <nv@linux.rocks> a écrit :
>
> Computer science was made by MEN for MEN.

Certainly not. The first programmers were women. Only when programming
started to become more fashionable, some failures like you started
to hide/remove women from the computer world.

> Programming was/is an art/science made by MEN for MEN.

Once again, wrong.

> All those who disagree are not MEN but PUSSIES.

It's not about agreement, it's about facts. Which you ignore because you
have no access to information in your asylum.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
From: candycanearter07
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 03:20 UTC
References: 1 2 3

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 03:20:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <slrnvhu0eg.2np23.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <pan$65c64$d7c347b$70e64aaf$48b6329f@linux.rocks>
<slrnvhnn7i.2ou1.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
<g7pnhjhdffkc4dpktrbptv3q3tur1u82f8@4ax.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 04:20:03 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ef6b06dfff19da2341416b5b7bdc79d2";
logging-data="882035"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+QBygV5vQngr4K379GOTtDA5kw5X0icLu/F0pNMtRvmQ=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CAV6nPDX235PBwwvEPsMUh34b5c=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
`~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D

View all headers

Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote at 18:36 this Friday (GMT):
> candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
> wrote:
>>Nux Vomica <nv@linux.rocks> wrote at 19:45 this Thursday (GMT):
>>
>>> Why no GNU/Linux women? I'll tell you fucking why.
>>>
>>> Computer science was made by MEN for MEN.
>>>
>>> Women, with their child-bearing intellectual organization,
>>> cannot ever fathom the intricacies and subtleties of computer
>>> programming.
>>>
>>> Programming was/is an art/science made by MEN for MEN.
>>>
>>> All those who disagree are not MEN but PUSSIES.
>>
>>I know some.
>
>
> You mean, Larry was talking out of his butthole, again, say it ain't
> so! Yeah, you are the future of Linux computing, he's a drain-bamaged
> monkey boy.

I mean, I'm not super good at coding but thanks
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
From: Stéphane CARPENTIER
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Organization: Mulots' Killer
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 19:49 UTC
References: 1 2 3 4

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed4-a.proxad.net!nnrp1-2.free.fr!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
From: sc@fiat-linux.fr (Stéphane CARPENTIER)
Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
References: <pan$65c64$d7c347b$70e64aaf$48b6329f@linux.rocks>
<slrnvhnn7i.2ou1.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
<g7pnhjhdffkc4dpktrbptv3q3tur1u82f8@4ax.com>
<slrnvhu0eg.2np23.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
Organization: Mulots' Killer
User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 01 Nov 2024 19:49:49 GMT
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <672530dd$0$29733$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 01 Nov 2024 20:49:49 CET
NNTP-Posting-Host: 78.201.248.7
X-Trace: 1730490589 news-1.free.fr 29733 78.201.248.7:36738
X-Complaints-To: abuse@proxad.net

View all headers

Le 28-10-2024, candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> a écrit :
>
> I mean, I'm not super good at coding but thanks

I don't know your coding level, but you can't be inferior to
DG/LP/FR/whatever. The only coding he can do is copy paste some code he
found on Internet.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
From: Farley Flud
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 20:23 UTC
References: 1 2 3 4 5

From: ff@linux.rocks (Farley Flud)
Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
References: <pan$65c64$d7c347b$70e64aaf$48b6329f@linux.rocks> <slrnvhnn7i.2ou1.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <g7pnhjhdffkc4dpktrbptv3q3tur1u82f8@4ax.com> <slrnvhu0eg.2np23.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <672530dd$0$29733$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <pan$4e5b5$8c45f180$42f88595$bccabe89@linux.rocks>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Lines: 28
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news.usenetexpress.com!not-for-mail
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 20:23:39 +0000
Nntp-Posting-Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 20:23:39 +0000
X-Received-Bytes: 1487
Organization: UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
X-Complaints-To: abuse@usenetexpress.com

View all headers

On 01 Nov 2024 19:49:49 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

>
> I don't know your coding level, but you can't be inferior to
> DG/LP/FR/whatever. The only coding he can do is copy paste some code he
> found on Internet.
>

Show us YOUR code, imbecile.

Or better, can you solve the problem I posed to Physfitfreak?

You do not understand fundamental computer science and therefore
you cannot solve, or even understand, the problem.

Although I can appreciate your defenses of GNU/Linux, your incompetence
makes you just another distro lackey.

In other words, if it were not for GNU/Linux distros you would
most likely not be using GNU/Linux.

You are a pathetic LACKEY.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!

--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
From: candycanearter07
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 03:10 UTC
References: 1 2 3 4 5

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 03:10:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: the-candyden-of-code
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <slrnvib5j9.3o1ra.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References: <pan$65c64$d7c347b$70e64aaf$48b6329f@linux.rocks>
<slrnvhnn7i.2ou1.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
<g7pnhjhdffkc4dpktrbptv3q3tur1u82f8@4ax.com>
<slrnvhu0eg.2np23.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
<672530dd$0$29733$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 04:10:03 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b1de36db2f961bd90bc72c89140bae3a";
logging-data="3824656"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18XEXoGIseAeCgO5+gd681q/1FbJgPygANOwLttzcxdZA=="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2NhFodRHeHh4vEnr8iNZP9MJxjw=
X-Face: b{dPmN&%4|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]%
b+ V4R8q|QiU/R8\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx
`~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e
ZrQsWJ >|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D

View all headers

Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote at 19:49 this Friday (GMT):
> Le 28-10-2024, candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> a écrit :
>>
>> I mean, I'm not super good at coding but thanks
>
> I don't know your coding level, but you can't be inferior to
> DG/LP/FR/whatever. The only coding he can do is copy paste some code he
> found on Internet.

I've done a little bit of coding for a OSS game and have a few C
projects on my github.
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
From: Joel
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2024 11:17 UTC
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 11:17:30 +0000
From: joelcrump@gmail.com (Joel)
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2024 07:17:30 -0400
Message-ID: <ne2cijdtr73gch6osrljc5ktld30mo2vem@4ax.com>
References: <pan$65c64$d7c347b$70e64aaf$48b6329f@linux.rocks> <slrnvhnn7i.2ou1.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <g7pnhjhdffkc4dpktrbptv3q3tur1u82f8@4ax.com> <slrnvhu0eg.2np23.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <672530dd$0$29733$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <slrnvib5j9.3o1ra.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
OS: Debian 12, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Lines: 35
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-xhX2woqrAof3jw0s3woHmhjDUTavLaY9zxSMfkYLJ7uFqxZu9jr4i7r76cvyNnFFmHShZ3pGE9DBznO!wdxYO2d6V4qZ3F/u5uS5eBl+e30Oos+8raeSdnn7oyImKUqeRcnNtt6a7NZoRVV8DKyeW9Jg
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40

View all headers

candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
wrote:
>Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote at 19:49 this Friday (GMT):
>> Le 28-10-2024, candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> a écrit :
>>>
>>> I mean, I'm not super good at coding but thanks
>>
>> I don't know your coding level, but you can't be inferior to
>> DG/LP/FR/whatever. The only coding he can do is copy paste some code he
>> found on Internet.
>
>I've done a little bit of coding for a OSS game and have a few C
>projects on my github.

Stéphane is correct, you are destined to be a really good programmer/
developer, Larry/Russell/nymshifting punk bitch is an aging never-was.
You just keep doing you, you're the future of great computing, thank
you for being here, and fuck Larry.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Subject	Author
Why No GNU/Linux Women ?	Nux Vomica
Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?	Chris Ahlstrom
Re: Why No GNU/Linux Programmers named Larry Piet?	DFS
Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?	candycanearter07
Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?	Joel
Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?	candycanearter07
Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?	Stéphane CARPENTIER
Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?	Farley Flud
Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?	candycanearter07
Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?	Joel
Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?	Stéphane CARPENTIER