Interesting question isn't it?

Maybe this is his boyfriend?

<https://data.ibtimes.sg/en/full/55264/sam-brinton.png>

<https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4272167/posts>

<https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13980261/tucker-carlson-sex-claim-kamala-harris-vp-tim-walz.html>

'Tim Walz looks 'super, super gay' and someone should just ask him
whether he is homosexual, former Fox News star Tucker Carlson has
claimed.

The maverick broadcaster said no one should be offended by the question
given the Democrats' insistence that homosexuality is 'morally superior
to being heterosexual'.

Carlson made the wild suggestion during an interview with
DailyMail.com's Charlie Spiering about his new book, Amateur Hour:
Kamala Harris in the White House.

Spiering told Carlson that there is zero evidence to support questions
about Walz's sexuality but the firebrand podcast insisted that the
flamboyant mannerisms of Kamala's VP pick made him appear gay.

'If there's nothing wrong with being gay, then why would it be somehow
crazy or out of bounds or taboo or offensive for me to say to Tim Walz
"You seem gay. Are you gay?" Carlson asked.

'But you know as well as I do that if I had an employer, which I don't,
I would immediately be fired.''

'Carlson, who was fired by Fox in April last year, admitted he had no
evidence for claiming that the Democrats' VP pick is gay beyond his
exuberant stage presence and 'jazz hands' waving to keyed-up supporters.

Do YOU think Tucker's remarks were inappropriate?

Yes
No
'I'm just saying the guy looks super, super gay to me,' he said.

'But they're the ones always running around being like "It's great to be
gay."

'Okay, if it's great to be gay, then why is it an attack on him for me
to say that? And why would it be out of bounds to be like, "Hey, Tim
Walz, are you gay? Have you ever slept with dudes?"'

Carlson contrasted Walz's demand that the government 'stay the hell out
of your bedroom' with his insistence that homosexuality is nothing to be
ashamed of.

'They're so private? Really?' he demanded.

'You've got a LGBTQ plus parade in San Francisco, New York, Seattle,
every big city in the country people having sex in the street, so it's
not private,' he claimed.

'They're telling my kids constantly that it's a good thing, so there's
nothing private or forbidden or taboo about it now, right? Just to be
clear.'

Carlson's guest Charlie Spiering (pictured) of DailyMail.com agreed that
the Democrat ticket would blackball any reporters with a record of
asking pointed questions

Carlson's guest Charlie Spiering (pictured) of DailyMail.com agreed that
the Democrat ticket would blackball any reporters with a record of
asking pointed questions

The Minnesota Governor has been keenly supportive of LGBT rights and was
faculty adviser for the first ever ‘gay-straight alliance’ group at
Mankato West High School in the 1990s
+ 6
View gallery
The Minnesota Governor has been keenly supportive of LGBT rights and was
faculty adviser for the first ever 'gay-straight alliance' group at
Mankato West High School in the 1990s

The former geography teacher has been married for 30 years, has two
children with his wife, Gwen Whipple, and has never suggested he is gay

The former geography teacher has been married for 30 years, has two
children with his wife, Gwen Whipple, and has never suggested he is gay

This is not the first time that Carlson has seemingly fixated on the
sexual orientation of politicians - as last year he interviewed and
repeated the accusation of Larry Sinclair, who said that he had sex with
Barack Obama and smoked cocaine together.

The allegation, which emerged while then-Senator Obama was gearing up
for the presidential election, was roundly condemned as an attempted
political hatchet-job.

But in 2023 Carlson claimed that it was 'really clear' that Obama had
been having a gay affair.

Carlson has previously accused Democrats of being so homophobic that the
Minnesota Governor feels unable to reveal his true sexuality.

'I'm never going to take another lecture about gay rights from these
people,' he told Megyn Kelly on her SiriusXM show last week.

Walz has been married for 30 years, has two children with his wife Gwen
Whipple and has never suggested he is gay.

He has been keenly supportive of LGBT rights and was the faculty adviser
for the first ever 'gay-straight alliance' group at Mankato West High
School in the 1990s.

Carlson insisted he was not really interested in the 60-year-old's
sexuality but claimed 'they're not allowing me' to drop the subject.

'He's the one who ran a gay-straight alliance where he's talking to
children about their sex lives,' Carlson said.

'So right there, that's a criminal offense in my book. You don't get to
talk to other people's kids about their sex lives period, freak, right?
But there he's bragging about it okay?'

Spiering, whose biography of Harris, 'Amateur Hour', examines how the
San Francisco socialite turned politico fast-tracked her way onto the
national stage, agreed that the Democrat ticket would blackball any
reporters with a record of asking pointed questions.

'Interviewing a presidential candidate is now a privilege bestowed on
you,' he confided. 'And you have to demonstrate that you're worthy on a
number of issues.'

Carlson said he would stop probing Walz's sexuality if the Democrats
stopped campaigning on contentious personal issues.

'I want to stop talking about our sex lives actually immediately, and I
want the State Department to stop forcing other people in other
countries to talk about their sex lives,' he explained.

'I don't want to hear about your abortion; I don't want you to talk
about abortion, shut up about abortion, about your sex life, about your
race.

'That's the world that I want to live in but they're not allowing me to
live in that world.

'So as long as they're not allowing me to live in that world why am I
playing along with rules that are rigged against me?'

On 20 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
news:n5uahjlkumfnt3scl20ggr4bnj9jamf7n9@4ax.com:

> Interesting question isn't it?
>
> Maybe this is his boyfriend?
>
><https://data.ibtimes.sg/en/full/55264/sam-brinton.png>
>
><https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4272167/posts>
>
>
>
><https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13980261/tucker-carlson-sex-cl
>aim-kamala-harris-vp-tim-walz.html>
>
>
> 'Tim Walz looks 'super, super gay' and someone should just ask him
> whether he is homosexual, former Fox News star Tucker Carlson has
> claimed.
>
> The maverick broadcaster said no one should be offended by the
> question given the Democrats' insistence that homosexuality is
> 'morally superior to being heterosexual'.
>
> Carlson made the wild suggestion during an interview with
> DailyMail.com's Charlie Spiering about his new book, Amateur Hour:
> Kamala Harris in the White House.
>
> Spiering told Carlson that there is zero evidence to support questions
> about Walz's sexuality but the firebrand podcast insisted that the
> flamboyant mannerisms of Kamala's VP pick made him appear gay.
>
> 'If there's nothing wrong with being gay, then why would it be somehow
> crazy or out of bounds or taboo or offensive for me to say to Tim Walz
> "You seem gay. Are you gay?" Carlson asked.
>
> 'But you know as well as I do that if I had an employer, which I
> don't, I would immediately be fired.''
>
> 'Carlson, who was fired by Fox in April last year, admitted he had no
> evidence for claiming that the Democrats' VP pick is gay beyond his
> exuberant stage presence and 'jazz hands' waving to keyed-up
> supporters.
>
> Do YOU think Tucker's remarks were inappropriate?
>
> Yes
> No
> 'I'm just saying the guy looks super, super gay to me,' he said.
>
> 'But they're the ones always running around being like "It's great to
> be gay."
>
> 'Okay, if it's great to be gay, then why is it an attack on him for me
> to say that? And why would it be out of bounds to be like, "Hey, Tim
> Walz, are you gay? Have you ever slept with dudes?"'
>
> Carlson contrasted Walz's demand that the government 'stay the hell
> out of your bedroom' with his insistence that homosexuality is nothing
> to be ashamed of.
>
> 'They're so private? Really?' he demanded.
>
> 'You've got a LGBTQ plus parade in San Francisco, New York, Seattle,
> every big city in the country people having sex in the street, so it's
> not private,' he claimed.

Just the thing you want children to see and democrats take theirs.

> 'They're telling my kids constantly that it's a good thing, so there's
> nothing private or forbidden or taboo about it now, right? Just to be
> clear.'
>
> Carlson's guest Charlie Spiering (pictured) of DailyMail.com agreed
> that the Democrat ticket would blackball any reporters with a record
> of asking pointed questions
>
> Carlson's guest Charlie Spiering (pictured) of DailyMail.com agreed
> that the Democrat ticket would blackball any reporters with a record
> of asking pointed questions
>
> The Minnesota Governor has been keenly supportive of LGBT rights and
> was faculty adviser for the first ever ‘gay-straight alliance’
> group at Mankato West High School in the 1990s
> +
> 6
> View gallery
> The Minnesota Governor has been keenly supportive of LGBT rights and
> was faculty adviser for the first ever 'gay-straight alliance' group
> at Mankato West High School in the 1990s
>
> The former geography teacher has been married for 30 years, has two
> children with his wife, Gwen Whipple, and has never suggested he is
> gay
>
> The former geography teacher has been married for 30 years, has two
> children with his wife, Gwen Whipple, and has never suggested he is
> gay
>
> This is not the first time that Carlson has seemingly fixated on the
> sexual orientation of politicians - as last year he interviewed and
> repeated the accusation of Larry Sinclair, who said that he had sex
> with Barack Obama and smoked cocaine together.
>
> The allegation, which emerged while then-Senator Obama was gearing up
> for the presidential election, was roundly condemned as an attempted
> political hatchet-job.
>
> But in 2023 Carlson claimed that it was 'really clear' that Obama had
> been having a gay affair.

"affairs"

> Carlson has previously accused Democrats of being so homophobic that
> the Minnesota Governor feels unable to reveal his true sexuality.
>
> 'I'm never going to take another lecture about gay rights from these
> people,' he told Megyn Kelly on her SiriusXM show last week.
>
> Walz has been married for 30 years, has two children with his wife
> Gwen Whipple and has never suggested he is gay.
>
>
> He has been keenly supportive of LGBT rights and was the faculty
> adviser for the first ever 'gay-straight alliance' group at Mankato
> West High School in the 1990s.

Nancy Pelosi was a nobody in Baltimore until she showed up in San
Francisco politics with support from Berkeley gays.

> Carlson insisted he was not really interested in the 60-year-old's
> sexuality but claimed 'they're not allowing me' to drop the subject.
>
> 'He's the one who ran a gay-straight alliance where he's talking to
> children about their sex lives,' Carlson said.
>
> 'So right there, that's a criminal offense in my book. You don't get
> to talk to other people's kids about their sex lives period, freak,
> right? But there he's bragging about it okay?'
>
> Spiering, whose biography of Harris, 'Amateur Hour', examines how the
> San Francisco socialite turned politico fast-tracked her way onto the
> national stage, agreed that the Democrat ticket would blackball any
> reporters with a record of asking pointed questions.
>
> 'Interviewing a presidential candidate is now a privilege bestowed on
> you,' he confided. 'And you have to demonstrate that you're worthy on
> a number of issues.'
>
>
> Carlson said he would stop probing Walz's sexuality if the Democrats
> stopped campaigning on contentious personal issues.
>
> 'I want to stop talking about our sex lives actually immediately, and
> I want the State Department to stop forcing other people in other
> countries to talk about their sex lives,' he explained.
>
> 'I don't want to hear about your abortion; I don't want you to talk
> about abortion, shut up about abortion, about your sex life, about
> your race.
>
> 'That's the world that I want to live in but they're not allowing me
> to live in that world.
>
> 'So as long as they're not allowing me to live in that world why am I
> playing along with rules that are rigged against me?'

The rules are rigged against heterosexuals, women and caucasians now.

if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.

kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:

>if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.

You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
vagina and uterus? Idiot.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Oct 24, 2024 at 1:04:09 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
<t0alhj5osl2sf56eg2a9lrrhrn9mh76tfk@4ax.com>:

> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>
>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
>
>
> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
> vagina and uterus? Idiot.

Walz is not trans.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Oct 24, 2024 at 1:04:09?PM MST, "Joel" wrote
><t0alhj5osl2sf56eg2a9lrrhrn9mh76tfk@4ax.com>:
>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>
>>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
>>
>> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
>> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
>
>Walz is not trans.

Yeah, I wasn't referring to the governor, but an abstract trans man
who'd use the tampon he enabled to be sold, in the boys' bathroom.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Oct 24, 2024 at 2:03:01 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
<gedlhj18fbst1sfih6liu1tphsbt3u0udt@4ax.com>:

> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 24, 2024 at 1:04:09?PM MST, "Joel" wrote
>> <t0alhj5osl2sf56eg2a9lrrhrn9mh76tfk@4ax.com>:
>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>
>>>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
>>>
>>> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
>>> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
>>
>> Walz is not trans.
>
>
> Yeah, I wasn't referring to the governor, but an abstract trans man
> who'd use the tampon he enabled to be sold, in the boys' bathroom.

Fair enough. Thanks.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <gedlhj18fbst1sfih6liu1tphsbt3u0udt@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Oct 24, 2024 at 1:04:09?PM MST, "Joel" wrote
> ><t0alhj5osl2sf56eg2a9lrrhrn9mh76tfk@4ax.com>:
> >> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
> >>
> >>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
> >>
> >> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
> >> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
> >
> >Walz is not trans.
>
>
> Yeah, I wasn't referring to the governor, but an abstract trans man
> who'd use the tampon he enabled to be sold, in the boys' bathroom.

Up your bum

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>In article <gedlhj18fbst1sfih6liu1tphsbt3u0udt@4ax.com>,
>joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Oct 24, 2024 at 1:04:09?PM MST, "Joel" wrote
>> ><t0alhj5osl2sf56eg2a9lrrhrn9mh76tfk@4ax.com>:
>> >> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
>> >>
>> >> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
>> >> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
>> >
>> >Walz is not trans.
>>
>> Yeah, I wasn't referring to the governor, but an abstract trans man
>> who'd use the tampon he enabled to be sold, in the boys' bathroom.
>
>Up your bum

For what purpose?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Oct 24, 2024 at 2:36:26 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
<tdflhjp141v97v8i46uank9p712qe4kjh6@4ax.com>:

> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <gedlhj18fbst1sfih6liu1tphsbt3u0udt@4ax.com>,
>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Oct 24, 2024 at 1:04:09?PM MST, "Joel" wrote
>>>> <t0alhj5osl2sf56eg2a9lrrhrn9mh76tfk@4ax.com>:
>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
>>>>>
>>>>> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
>>>>> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
>>>>
>>>> Walz is not trans.
>>>
>>> Yeah, I wasn't referring to the governor, but an abstract trans man
>>> who'd use the tampon he enabled to be sold, in the boys' bathroom.
>>
>> Up your bum
>
>
> For what purpose?

He is sharing his fantasies... but not seeking consent.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <tdflhjp141v97v8i46uank9p712qe4kjh6@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >In article <gedlhj18fbst1sfih6liu1tphsbt3u0udt@4ax.com>,
> >joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >On Oct 24, 2024 at 1:04:09?PM MST, "Joel" wrote
> >> ><t0alhj5osl2sf56eg2a9lrrhrn9mh76tfk@4ax.com>:
> >> >> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
> >> >>
> >> >> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
> >> >> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
> >> >
> >> >Walz is not trans.
> >>
> >> Yeah, I wasn't referring to the governor, but an abstract trans man
> >> who'd use the tampon he enabled to be sold, in the boys' bathroom.
> >
> >Up your bum
>
>
> For what purpose?

Ask Tampon Tim that.

In article <671abe3f$2$2385550$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Oct 24, 2024 at 2:36:26 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
> <tdflhjp141v97v8i46uank9p712qe4kjh6@4ax.com>:
>
> > Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> In article <gedlhj18fbst1sfih6liu1tphsbt3u0udt@4ax.com>,
> >> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Oct 24, 2024 at 1:04:09?PM MST, "Joel" wrote
> >>>> <t0alhj5osl2sf56eg2a9lrrhrn9mh76tfk@4ax.com>:
> >>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
> >>>>> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
> >>>>
> >>>> Walz is not trans.
> >>>
> >>> Yeah, I wasn't referring to the governor, but an abstract trans man
> >>> who'd use the tampon he enabled to be sold, in the boys' bathroom.
> >>
> >> Up your bum
> >
> >
> > For what purpose?
>
> He is sharing his fantasies... but not seeking consent.

He says as he butts in my conversation. You're a troll.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>In article <tdflhjp141v97v8i46uank9p712qe4kjh6@4ax.com>,
>joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> >In article <gedlhj18fbst1sfih6liu1tphsbt3u0udt@4ax.com>,
>> >joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> >> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Oct 24, 2024 at 1:04:09?PM MST, "Joel" wrote
>> >> ><t0alhj5osl2sf56eg2a9lrrhrn9mh76tfk@4ax.com>:
>> >> >> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
>> >> >> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
>> >> >
>> >> >Walz is not trans.
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, I wasn't referring to the governor, but an abstract trans man
>> >> who'd use the tampon he enabled to be sold, in the boys' bathroom.
>> >
>> >Up your bum
>>
>> For what purpose?
>
>Ask Tampon Tim that.

No, I already know why he put them in the bathrooms, because of trans
men, you fucking cracker moron. Why would a biomale put a tampon in
his ass? What the fuck are you talking about?

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Oct 24, 2024 at 2:46:44 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<671ac044$5$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <671abe3f$2$2385550$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Oct 24, 2024 at 2:36:26 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
>> <tdflhjp141v97v8i46uank9p712qe4kjh6@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <gedlhj18fbst1sfih6liu1tphsbt3u0udt@4ax.com>,
>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 24, 2024 at 1:04:09?PM MST, "Joel" wrote
>>>>>> <t0alhj5osl2sf56eg2a9lrrhrn9mh76tfk@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
>>>>>>> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Walz is not trans.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I wasn't referring to the governor, but an abstract trans man
>>>>> who'd use the tampon he enabled to be sold, in the boys' bathroom.
>>>>
>>>> Up your bum
>>>
>>>
>>> For what purpose?
>>
>> He is sharing his fantasies... but not seeking consent.
>
> He says as he butts in my conversation. You're a troll.

You shared your fantasy... but said nothing of consent. That is not a good
look for you.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <671ac3e2$2$212406$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Oct 24, 2024 at 2:46:44 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <671ac044$5$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
> > In article <671abe3f$2$2385550$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Oct 24, 2024 at 2:36:26 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
> >> <tdflhjp141v97v8i46uank9p712qe4kjh6@4ax.com>:
> >>
> >>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> In article <gedlhj18fbst1sfih6liu1tphsbt3u0udt@4ax.com>,
> >>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >>>>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Oct 24, 2024 at 1:04:09?PM MST, "Joel" wrote
> >>>>>> <t0alhj5osl2sf56eg2a9lrrhrn9mh76tfk@4ax.com>:
> >>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
> >>>>>>> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Walz is not trans.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yeah, I wasn't referring to the governor, but an abstract trans man
> >>>>> who'd use the tampon he enabled to be sold, in the boys' bathroom.
> >>>>
> >>>> Up your bum
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> For what purpose?
> >>
> >> He is sharing his fantasies... but not seeking consent.
> >
> > He says as he butts in my conversation. You're a troll.
>
> You shared your fantasy... but said nothing of consent. That is not a good
> look for you.

It's on YOUR mind not mine.

In article <b3glhjdocgvfv9427uar7ldpr8252njq5n@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >In article <tdflhjp141v97v8i46uank9p712qe4kjh6@4ax.com>,
> >joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> >> >In article <gedlhj18fbst1sfih6liu1tphsbt3u0udt@4ax.com>,
> >> >joelcrump@gmail.com says...
> >> >> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On Oct 24, 2024 at 1:04:09?PM MST, "Joel" wrote
> >> >> ><t0alhj5osl2sf56eg2a9lrrhrn9mh76tfk@4ax.com>:
> >> >> >> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
> >> >> >> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Walz is not trans.
> >> >>
> >> >> Yeah, I wasn't referring to the governor, but an abstract trans man
> >> >> who'd use the tampon he enabled to be sold, in the boys' bathroom.
> >> >
> >> >Up your bum
> >>
> >> For what purpose?
> >
> >Ask Tampon Tim that.
>
>
> No, I already know why he put them in the bathrooms, because of trans
> men, you fucking cracker moron. Why would a biomale put a tampon in
> his ass? What the fuck are you talking about?

You have had worse than that up your ass.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>> >> >> I wasn't referring to the governor, but an abstract trans man
>> >> >> who'd use the tampon he enabled to be sold, in the boys' bathroom.
>> >> >
>> >> >Up your bum
>> >>
>> >> For what purpose?
>> >
>> >Ask Tampon Tim that.
>>
>> No, I already know why he put them in the bathrooms, because of trans
>> men, you fucking cracker moron. Why would a biomale put a tampon in
>> his ass? What the fuck are you talking about?
>
>You have had worse than that up your ass.

If by "worse" you mean "that which would make sense". A tampon in an
ass is just dumb. A penis is quite common.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

In article <u0ilhj9ahidoko89n8o6n7aqfoals7c8vu@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> I wasn't referring to the governor, but an abstract trans man
> >> >> >> who'd use the tampon he enabled to be sold, in the boys' bathroom.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Up your bum
> >> >>
> >> >> For what purpose?
> >> >
> >> >Ask Tampon Tim that.
> >>
> >> No, I already know why he put them in the bathrooms, because of trans
> >> men, you fucking cracker moron. Why would a biomale put a tampon in
> >> his ass? What the fuck are you talking about?
> >
> >You have had worse than that up your ass.
>
>
> If by "worse" you mean "that which would make sense". A tampon in an
> ass is just dumb. A penis is quite common.

Not as common as you wish.

On Oct 24, 2024 at 3:08:45 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
<671ac56e$1$1895506$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

> In article <671ac3e2$2$212406$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Oct 24, 2024 at 2:46:44 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <671ac044$5$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>>> In article <671abe3f$2$2385550$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 24, 2024 at 2:36:26 PM MST, "Joel" wrote
>>>> <tdflhjp141v97v8i46uank9p712qe4kjh6@4ax.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> In article <gedlhj18fbst1sfih6liu1tphsbt3u0udt@4ax.com>,
>>>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Oct 24, 2024 at 1:04:09?PM MST, "Joel" wrote
>>>>>>>> <t0alhj5osl2sf56eg2a9lrrhrn9mh76tfk@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
>>>>>>>>> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Walz is not trans.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah, I wasn't referring to the governor, but an abstract trans man
>>>>>>> who'd use the tampon he enabled to be sold, in the boys' bathroom.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Up your bum
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For what purpose?
>>>>
>>>> He is sharing his fantasies... but not seeking consent.
>>>
>>> He says as he butts in my conversation. You're a troll.
>>
>> You shared your fantasy... but said nothing of consent. That is not a good
>> look for you.
>
> It's on YOUR mind not mine.

YOU own your words.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Joel wrote:
> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>
>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
>
>
> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
>

in that case, its not a guy, its a gal. ergo, my point stands.

On Oct 24, 2024 at 8:00:28 PM MST, "kazu" wrote
<baf7d916-54e3-ed1a-7baf-3728a865cb25@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:

> Joel wrote:
>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>
>>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
>>
>>
>> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
>> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
>>
>
> in that case, its not a guy, its a gal. ergo, my point stands.

You think a woman is a man?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Snit wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2024 at 8:00:28 PM MST, "kazu" wrote
> <baf7d916-54e3-ed1a-7baf-3728a865cb25@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>
>> Joel wrote:
>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>
>>>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
>>>
>>>
>>> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
>>> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
>>>
>>
>> in that case, its not a guy, its a gal. ergo, my point stands.
>
> You think a woman is a man?
>

i'm confused, what are you talking about? we are talking about a
guy putting on a tampon, right?

Joel wrote:
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>> In article <tdflhjp141v97v8i46uank9p712qe4kjh6@4ax.com>,
>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <gedlhj18fbst1sfih6liu1tphsbt3u0udt@4ax.com>,
>>>> joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>>>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 24, 2024 at 1:04:09?PM MST, "Joel" wrote
>>>>>> <t0alhj5osl2sf56eg2a9lrrhrn9mh76tfk@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
>>>>>>> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Walz is not trans.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I wasn't referring to the governor, but an abstract trans man
>>>>> who'd use the tampon he enabled to be sold, in the boys' bathroom.
>>>>
>>>> Up your bum
>>>
>>> For what purpose?
>>
>> Ask Tampon Tim that.
>
>
> No, I already know why he put them in the bathrooms, because of trans
> men, you fucking cracker moron. Why would a biomale put a tampon in
> his ass? What the fuck are you talking about?
>

that is what i am saying, why would a guy put a tampon in his
butt? LOL!

On 10/24/2024 8:00 PM, kazu wrote:
> Joel wrote:
>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>
>>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
>>
>>
>> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
>> vagina and uterus?  Idiot.
>>
>
> in that case, its not a guy, its a gal. ergo, my point stands.

You got him there.

kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:

>>> if a guy wears a tampon, then he is very likely gay.
>>
>> You do realize the guy is a trans man, biologically female, having a
>> vagina and uterus? Idiot.
>
>in that case, its not a guy, its a gal. ergo, my point stands.

Why would someone identify as trans if they didn't feel that their
gender identity didn't match their biological sex? Your ignorance of
it doesn't trump that fact - grow up, get with the times.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.