'Liberals are starting to panic. Donald Trump is going to win in a
landslide'

<https://news.yahoo.com/news/liberals-starting-panic-donald-trump-043000345.html>

'Denial is not only a river in Egypt. It is also a seductive expedient
for the Democratic Party in the waning days of the 2024 presidential
election. You see it everywhere in the official activities of the
Democratic campaign. WinBlue donations are soaring! The polls still have
Harris ahead! Democracy is on the line!

Escaping from the bluster of denial are worrisome little puffs of
pandering, always a sure sign that the denial is at best half-believed
by the denier.

This is not surprising. Denial is the reliable product of desperation:
the realisation, however imperfectly acknowledged, that the jig is up.

Harris’s numbers among men of all races are in the tank. The only
exception is among the brittle ephebes of the media and the academy.
They are there with their Chardonnay, list of pronouns, and ageing Covid
masks to plant Harris-Walz signs on their front lawns and warn against
the dangerous tyrant-in-waiting, Donald Trump.

But this is a minuscule, psephologically insignificant cohort. Which is
why the Harris-Walz campaign has been driven to desperate measures. In
the last week or two, they have rolled out a pitiful litany of feints
and diversionary tactics.

Some were unforced errors, as when the news programme 60 Minutes ran a
preview of its interview with Harris that prominently included one of
her signature no-calorie word salad emissions. CBS excised that response
when they aired the full interview, substituting an innocuous reply to
some other question. But the damage was done. The original response was
widely mocked. The bowdlerised substitute sparked fury and contempt for
the hapless, in-the-can-for-Harris behaviour of CBS.

My favourite bit of pandering was the truly horrible
“I’m-a-man-and-I’m-voting-for-Harris” ad. It was rightly derided as the
“cringiest political ad ever.”

Like many people, I at first thought it was a spoof, an anti-Harris
production designed to make fun of her and her running mate, Tim Walz.
That certainly was the effect. But it turns out that the half dozen men
in the ad were not random bearers of XY chromosomes who just happened to
support Harris for president. No, they were apparently B-list actors,
recruited to deliver their lines.

And what lines they were. One actor, who pretended to know something
about cars, said “You think I’m afraid to rebuild a carburetor? I eat
carburetors for breakfast.” I am thinking of offering a reward to anyone
who can tell me what that means.

One enterprising commentator discovered who wrote the ad – Jacob Reed,
who has written for the late-night talk-show host Jimmy Kimmel – and the
real-life biographies of the actors. Let’s just say that none appears to
be a poster child for masculinity. The comments have been brutal. “Zero
testosterone was used in the making of this ad”; “A Real Man instantly
realises that there isn’t a single Real Man in this pathetic beta male
cringe-fest of a propaganda video”; “From the party that can’t tell you
what a woman is”; “As a man, I think I walked away from this ad with a
yeast infection.”

Then there was Tim Walz’s “pheasant hunting” wheeze. I deploy the scare
quotes because no pheasants were harmed in the production of that farce.
Walz and a handful of reporters, accoutered in identical, brand-new
hunting gear, are shown traipsing around a field without guns. Were they
intending to catch the pheasant by hand and strangle them?

Eventually Walz is given a shotgun, but it was the wrong sort of gun for
a hunt – semi-automatic, not a break-action gun. Not that it mattered.
As one commentator noted, Walz’s “gun handling skills make Dick Cheney
look like the safest shooter in the world. Perhaps that is why Cheney
endorsed him.”

Walz was alternately compared to the cartoon character Elmer Fudd and
Governor Mike Dukakis. Readers with long memories will remember how,
during the 1988 presidential campaign, Dukakis tried to act tough by
riding around in an army tank wearing a too-large helmet. It marked the
end of his campaign.

I have been predicting that Donald Trump would win in a landslide since
before Joe Biden was pushed out of the race in July and Kamala Harris
was suddenly air-lifted into the vacant top spot. At first the Democrats
put on a brave show. Harris got a minor bounce from the Democratic
convention. Despite emitting a cavalcade of lies, she more or less held
her own in her one debate with Trump.

But soon after Labor Day in early September, cracks began to appear. In
2020, just 44,000 votes in a handful of swing states won the presidency
for Joe Biden. That was in the midst of the national panic over Covid.
The Dems don’t have a Chinese virus to help them this time. They know
all this. Hence their panic. It is entirely justified.'

boo hoo and waah wahh

fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!

John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 'Liberals are starting to panic. Donald Trump is going to win in a
> landslide'
>
> <https://news.yahoo.com/news/liberals-starting-panic-donald-trump-043000345.html>
>
> 'Denial is not only a river in Egypt.

I did not know this
I cannot find this river on a map

It is also a seductive expedient
> for the Democratic Party in the waning days of the 2024 presidential
> election. You see it everywhere in the official activities of the
> Democratic campaign. WinBlue donations are soaring! The polls still have
> Harris ahead! Democracy is on the line!
>
> Escaping from the bluster of denial are worrisome little puffs of
> pandering, always a sure sign that the denial is at best half-believed
> by the denier.
>
> This is not surprising. Denial is the reliable product of desperation:
> the realisation, however imperfectly acknowledged, that the jig is up.
>
> Harris’s numbers among men of all races are in the tank. The only
> exception is among the brittle ephebes of the media and the academy.
> They are there with their Chardonnay, list of pronouns, and ageing Covid
> masks to plant Harris-Walz signs on their front lawns and warn against
> the dangerous tyrant-in-waiting, Donald Trump.
>
> But this is a minuscule, psephologically insignificant cohort. Which is
> why the Harris-Walz campaign has been driven to desperate measures. In
> the last week or two, they have rolled out a pitiful litany of feints
> and diversionary tactics.
>
> Some were unforced errors, as when the news programme 60 Minutes ran a
> preview of its interview with Harris that prominently included one of
> her signature no-calorie word salad emissions. CBS excised that response
> when they aired the full interview, substituting an innocuous reply to
> some other question. But the damage was done. The original response was
> widely mocked. The bowdlerised substitute sparked fury and contempt for
> the hapless, in-the-can-for-Harris behaviour of CBS.
>
> My favourite bit of pandering was the truly horrible
> “I’m-a-man-and-I’m-voting-for-Harris” ad. It was rightly derided as the
> “cringiest political ad ever.”
>
> Like many people, I at first thought it was a spoof, an anti-Harris
> production designed to make fun of her and her running mate, Tim Walz.
> That certainly was the effect. But it turns out that the half dozen men
> in the ad were not random bearers of XY chromosomes who just happened to
> support Harris for president. No, they were apparently B-list actors,
> recruited to deliver their lines.
>
> And what lines they were. One actor, who pretended to know something
> about cars, said “You think I’m afraid to rebuild a carburetor? I eat
> carburetors for breakfast.” I am thinking of offering a reward to anyone
> who can tell me what that means.
>
> One enterprising commentator discovered who wrote the ad – Jacob Reed,
> who has written for the late-night talk-show host Jimmy Kimmel – and the
> real-life biographies of the actors. Let’s just say that none appears to
> be a poster child for masculinity. The comments have been brutal. “Zero
> testosterone was used in the making of this ad”; “A Real Man instantly
> realises that there isn’t a single Real Man in this pathetic beta male
> cringe-fest of a propaganda video”; “From the party that can’t tell you
> what a woman is”; “As a man, I think I walked away from this ad with a
> yeast infection.”
>
> Then there was Tim Walz’s “pheasant hunting” wheeze. I deploy the scare
> quotes because no pheasants were harmed in the production of that farce.
> Walz and a handful of reporters, accoutered in identical, brand-new
> hunting gear, are shown traipsing around a field without guns. Were they
> intending to catch the pheasant by hand and strangle them?
>
> Eventually Walz is given a shotgun, but it was the wrong sort of gun for
> a hunt – semi-automatic, not a break-action gun. Not that it mattered.
> As one commentator noted, Walz’s “gun handling skills make Dick Cheney
> look like the safest shooter in the world. Perhaps that is why Cheney
> endorsed him.”
>
> Walz was alternately compared to the cartoon character Elmer Fudd and
> Governor Mike Dukakis. Readers with long memories will remember how,
> during the 1988 presidential campaign, Dukakis tried to act tough by
> riding around in an army tank wearing a too-large helmet. It marked the
> end of his campaign.
>
> I have been predicting that Donald Trump would win in a landslide since
> before Joe Biden was pushed out of the race in July and Kamala Harris
> was suddenly air-lifted into the vacant top spot. At first the Democrats
> put on a brave show. Harris got a minor bounce from the Democratic
> convention. Despite emitting a cavalcade of lies, she more or less held
> her own in her one debate with Trump.
>
> But soon after Labor Day in early September, cracks began to appear. In
> 2020, just 44,000 votes in a handful of swing states won the presidency
> for Joe Biden. That was in the midst of the national panic over Covid.
> The Dems don’t have a Chinese virus to help them this time. They know
> all this. Hence their panic. It is entirely justified.'
>

kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
> boo hoo and waah wahh
>
> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>

So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.

How does that help, losing by less?
So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
But still lost PA overall.
Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
trump only 55-45 this time.

What difference does that make?
How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?

marika wrote:
> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>
>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>
>
>
> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>
> How does that help, losing by less?
> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
> But still lost PA overall.
> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
> trump only 55-45 this time.
>
> What difference does that make?
> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>

marika, what are you doing tonight?

kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
> marika wrote:
>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>
>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>
>>
>>
>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>
>> How does that help, losing by less?
>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>> But still lost PA overall.
>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>
>> What difference does that make?
>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>
>
>
> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>
>

Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”

On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
<lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:

> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>> marika wrote:
>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>
>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>
>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>
>>> What difference does that make?
>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>
>>
>>
>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>
>>
>
> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”

What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
they are enjoying.

Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
not lamb).

Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
felt like it. LOL!

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
>
>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>> marika wrote:
>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>>
>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>>
>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>>
>>>> What difference does that make?
>>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”
>
> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
> they are enjoying.
>
> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
> not lamb).
>
> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
> felt like it. LOL!
>
>

I made a sockeye salmon marinated in a maple soy herb marinade.

And a tomato sauce. Actually two leftover sauces i made, and then combined.
Over pasta.

It hit the spot

On Oct 19, 2024 at 7:14:52 PM MST, "marika" wrote
<wIZQO.516120$_o_3.91270@fx17.iad>:

> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
>> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
>>
>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>> marika wrote:
>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>>>
>>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>>>
>>>>> What difference does that make?
>>>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”
>>
>> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
>> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
>> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
>> they are enjoying.
>>
>> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
>> not lamb).
>>
>> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
>> felt like it. LOL!
>>
>>
>
> I made a sockeye salmon marinated in a maple soy herb marinade.

Sounds yummy.
>
> And a tomato sauce. Actually two leftover sauces i made, and then combined.
> Over pasta.
>
> It hit the spot

Do you do a lot of cooking?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Snit wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
>
>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>> marika wrote:
>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>>
>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>>
>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>>
>>>> What difference does that make?
>>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”
>
> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
> they are enjoying.
>
> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
> not lamb).
>
> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
> felt like it. LOL!
>
>

snit, are you a girl??

marika wrote:
> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>> marika wrote:
>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>
>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>
>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>
>>> What difference does that make?
>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>
>>
>>
>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>
>>
>
> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”
>

the refugees, have to check that. i am watching clarkson's farm
these days, its pretty good.

Snit wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2024 at 7:14:52 PM MST, "marika" wrote
> <wIZQO.516120$_o_3.91270@fx17.iad>:
>
>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
>>> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
>>>
>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>> marika wrote:
>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>>>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>>>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>>>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What difference does that make?
>>>>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”
>>>
>>> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
>>> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
>>> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
>>> they are enjoying.
>>>
>>> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
>>> not lamb).
>>>
>>> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
>>> felt like it. LOL!
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I made a sockeye salmon marinated in a maple soy herb marinade.
>
> Sounds yummy.
>>
>> And a tomato sauce. Actually two leftover sauces i made, and then combined.
>> Over pasta.
>>
>> It hit the spot
>
> Do you do a lot of cooking?
>

you guys are gourmet!

On Oct 20, 2024 at 2:47:00 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
<456f59fc-f53c-c19e-eaf2-da8a44836c99@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:

> Snit wrote:
>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 7:14:52 PM MST, "marika" wrote
>> <wIZQO.516120$_o_3.91270@fx17.iad>:
>>
>>> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
>>>> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
>>>>
>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>> marika wrote:
>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>>>>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>>>>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>>>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>>>>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>>>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>>>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What difference does that make?
>>>>>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”
>>>>
>>>> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
>>>> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
>>>> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
>>>> they are enjoying.
>>>>
>>>> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
>>>> not lamb).
>>>>
>>>> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
>>>> felt like it. LOL!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I made a sockeye salmon marinated in a maple soy herb marinade.
>>
>> Sounds yummy.
>>>
>>> And a tomato sauce. Actually two leftover sauces i made, and then combined.
>>> Over pasta.
>>>
>>> It hit the spot
>>
>> Do you do a lot of cooking?
>>
>
> you guys are gourmet!

I dabble often.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Oct 20, 2024 at 2:44:04 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
<af882755-0d7c-5921-264c-6c77fe3f27bf@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:

> Snit wrote:
>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
>> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
>>
>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>> marika wrote:
>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>>>
>>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>>>
>>>>> What difference does that make?
>>>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”
>>
>> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
>> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
>> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
>> they are enjoying.
>>
>> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
>> not lamb).
>>
>> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
>> felt like it. LOL!
>>
>>
>
>
> snit, are you a girl??

Nope. But I bake and cook quite a bit. Also do a lot of "MacGyverish" home
repairs.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Snit wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2024 at 2:44:04 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
> <af882755-0d7c-5921-264c-6c77fe3f27bf@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
>>> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
>>>
>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>> marika wrote:
>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>>>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>>>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>>>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What difference does that make?
>>>>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”
>>>
>>> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
>>> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
>>> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
>>> they are enjoying.
>>>
>>> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
>>> not lamb).
>>>
>>> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
>>> felt like it. LOL!
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> snit, are you a girl??
>
> Nope. But I bake and cook quite a bit. Also do a lot of "MacGyverish" home
> repairs.
>

oh ok, sometimes its hard for me to know. i tune my responses
based on if its a girl or not.

On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:16:33 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
<c410b22a-78af-6d2d-831f-950544c90442@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:

> Snit wrote:
>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 2:44:04 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>> <af882755-0d7c-5921-264c-6c77fe3f27bf@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
>>>> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
>>>>
>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>> marika wrote:
>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>>>>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>>>>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>>>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>>>>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>>>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>>>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What difference does that make?
>>>>>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”
>>>>
>>>> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
>>>> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
>>>> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
>>>> they are enjoying.
>>>>
>>>> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
>>>> not lamb).
>>>>
>>>> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
>>>> felt like it. LOL!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> snit, are you a girl??
>>
>> Nope. But I bake and cook quite a bit. Also do a lot of "MacGyverish" home
>> repairs.
>>
>
>
> oh ok, sometimes its hard for me to know. i tune my responses
> based on if its a girl or not.

Why?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Snit wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:16:33 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
> <c410b22a-78af-6d2d-831f-950544c90442@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 2:44:04 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>>> <af882755-0d7c-5921-264c-6c77fe3f27bf@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>>
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
>>>>> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>> marika wrote:
>>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>>>>>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>>>>>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>>>>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>>>>>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>>>>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>>>>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What difference does that make?
>>>>>>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”
>>>>>
>>>>> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
>>>>> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
>>>>> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
>>>>> they are enjoying.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
>>>>> not lamb).
>>>>>
>>>>> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
>>>>> felt like it. LOL!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> snit, are you a girl??
>>>
>>> Nope. But I bake and cook quite a bit. Also do a lot of "MacGyverish" home
>>> repairs.
>>>
>>
>>
>> oh ok, sometimes its hard for me to know. i tune my responses
>> based on if its a girl or not.
>
> Why?
>

why?? becuase women are sensitive dude, you have to finnese. they
block me for no reason and then they say hi the next.

In article <67150d82$3$212413$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Oct 20, 2024 at 2:44:04 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
> <af882755-0d7c-5921-264c-6c77fe3f27bf@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>
> > Snit wrote:
> >> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
> >> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
> >>
> >>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
> >>>> marika wrote:
> >>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
> >>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
> >>>>> of swing states. It?s being reported as ?she knows she won?t win those, but
> >>>>> she?s going for the margins, ie to ?lose by less?.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
> >>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
> >>>>> But still lost PA overall.
> >>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
> >>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What difference does that make?
> >>>>> How does ?losing by less? help win the state? Does it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Making dinner and watching the finale of ?The Refugees?
> >>
> >> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
> >> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
> >> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
> >> they are enjoying.
> >>
> >> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
> >> not lamb).
> >>
> >> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
> >> felt like it. LOL!
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > snit, are you a girl??
>
> Nope. But I bake and cook quite a bit. Also do a lot of "MacGyverish" home
> repairs.

Duct tape and bailing wire is not that.

On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:30:05 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
<24a4eba9-6193-8c3a-9fc3-98b6960ebde8@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:

> Snit wrote:
>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:16:33 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>> <c410b22a-78af-6d2d-831f-950544c90442@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 2:44:04 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>>>> <af882755-0d7c-5921-264c-6c77fe3f27bf@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
>>>>>> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>> marika wrote:
>>>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>>>>>>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>>>>>>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>>>>>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>>>>>>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>>>>>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>>>>>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What difference does that make?
>>>>>>>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
>>>>>> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
>>>>>> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
>>>>>> they are enjoying.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
>>>>>> not lamb).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
>>>>>> felt like it. LOL!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> snit, are you a girl??
>>>>
>>>> Nope. But I bake and cook quite a bit. Also do a lot of "MacGyverish" home
>>>> repairs.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> oh ok, sometimes its hard for me to know. i tune my responses
>>> based on if its a girl or not.
>>
>> Why?
>>
>
> why?? becuase women are sensitive dude, you have to finnese. they
> block me for no reason and then they say hi the next.

This is not a dating site. :)

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Snit wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:30:05 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
> <24a4eba9-6193-8c3a-9fc3-98b6960ebde8@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:16:33 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>>> <c410b22a-78af-6d2d-831f-950544c90442@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>>
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 2:44:04 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>>>>> <af882755-0d7c-5921-264c-6c77fe3f27bf@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
>>>>>>> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> marika wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>>>>>>>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>>>>>>>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>>>>>>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>>>>>>>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>>>>>>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>>>>>>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What difference does that make?
>>>>>>>>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
>>>>>>> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
>>>>>>> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
>>>>>>> they are enjoying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
>>>>>>> not lamb).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
>>>>>>> felt like it. LOL!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> snit, are you a girl??
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. But I bake and cook quite a bit. Also do a lot of "MacGyverish" home
>>>>> repairs.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> oh ok, sometimes its hard for me to know. i tune my responses
>>>> based on if its a girl or not.
>>>
>>> Why?
>>>
>>
>> why?? becuase women are sensitive dude, you have to finnese. they
>> block me for no reason and then they say hi the next.
>
> This is not a dating site. :)
>

i know, but i am not a stone.

On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:48:19 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
<656ff168-569e-ff25-4921-9f7cecce2273@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:

> Snit wrote:
>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:30:05 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>> <24a4eba9-6193-8c3a-9fc3-98b6960ebde8@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:16:33 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>>>> <c410b22a-78af-6d2d-831f-950544c90442@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 2:44:04 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>>>>>> <af882755-0d7c-5921-264c-6c77fe3f27bf@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
>>>>>>>> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> marika wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>>>>>>>>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>>>>>>>>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>>>>>>>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>>>>>>>>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>>>>>>>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>>>>>>>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What difference does that make?
>>>>>>>>>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
>>>>>>>> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
>>>>>>>> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
>>>>>>>> they are enjoying.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
>>>>>>>> not lamb).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
>>>>>>>> felt like it. LOL!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> snit, are you a girl??
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. But I bake and cook quite a bit. Also do a lot of "MacGyverish" home
>>>>>> repairs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> oh ok, sometimes its hard for me to know. i tune my responses
>>>>> based on if its a girl or not.
>>>>
>>>> Why?
>>>>
>>>
>>> why?? becuase women are sensitive dude, you have to finnese. they
>>> block me for no reason and then they say hi the next.
>>
>> This is not a dating site. :)
>>
>
> i know, but i am not a stone.

What makes you think women are more sensitive?

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Snit wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:48:19 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
> <656ff168-569e-ff25-4921-9f7cecce2273@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>
>> Snit wrote:
>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:30:05 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>>> <24a4eba9-6193-8c3a-9fc3-98b6960ebde8@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>>
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:16:33 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>>>>> <c410b22a-78af-6d2d-831f-950544c90442@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 2:44:04 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>>>>>>> <af882755-0d7c-5921-264c-6c77fe3f27bf@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
>>>>>>>>> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> marika wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>>>>>>>>>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>>>>>>>>>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>>>>>>>>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>>>>>>>>>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>>>>>>>>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What difference does that make?
>>>>>>>>>>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
>>>>>>>>> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
>>>>>>>>> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
>>>>>>>>> they are enjoying.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
>>>>>>>>> not lamb).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
>>>>>>>>> felt like it. LOL!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> snit, are you a girl??
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope. But I bake and cook quite a bit. Also do a lot of "MacGyverish" home
>>>>>>> repairs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> oh ok, sometimes its hard for me to know. i tune my responses
>>>>>> based on if its a girl or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> why?? becuase women are sensitive dude, you have to finnese. they
>>>> block me for no reason and then they say hi the next.
>>>
>>> This is not a dating site. :)
>>>
>>
>> i know, but i am not a stone.
>
> What makes you think women are more sensitive?
>

it is a fact of nature. women are sensitive. they are not
operating on the same league as us.

On Sun, 20 Oct 2024 00:29:51 GMT, marika <marika5000@gmail.com> wrote:

>kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>
>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>
>
>
>So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>
>How does that help, losing by less?
>So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>But still lost PA overall.
>Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>trump only 55-45 this time.
>
>What difference does that make?
>How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?

It boosts his state vote total whether or not it's enough to change the EC
outcome. Trump recently went on a blue state tour. What possible good could it
do him to campaign in California?

Popular vote. He hasn't won a popular vote in his life. But he's delusional if
he thinks campaigning in blue states is going to help with that.

Winning Iowa by two points but losing California by twenty isn't going to help
him much in the pop vote.

Finally, there have been indications of red states flipping. Trump's lead in
red Iowa is surprisingly weak (5%) and only recently did NC become a
battleground.

In the 24 most competitive states, all of Trump's leads are low single digits.
Even in Texas Trump's lead is just over 5% and this is coming from 270towin,
hardly a bastion of liberal love.

<https://www.270towin.com/2024-presidential-election-polls/>

On the state polling averages, select display by "Competitiveness" to see how
close this race is even in the red states.

--
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 16 days.

55) Trump vowed to protect American jobs, but offshoring
increased, and manufacturing fell.

56) Trump said he would fix America's infrastructure but it
never happened. He announced so many failed "infrastructure weeks",
they became a running joke! White House reporter,
"Since it’s infrastructure week..." (Laughter is the press room)
(To Sarah Huckabee) "*Is* it infrastructure week?"

On Oct 20, 2024 at 8:03:35 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
<614e8f2e-9df3-bf59-44b1-2cddbe411ad5@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:

> Snit wrote:
>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:48:19 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>> <656ff168-569e-ff25-4921-9f7cecce2273@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:30:05 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>>>> <24a4eba9-6193-8c3a-9fc3-98b6960ebde8@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:16:33 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>>>>>> <c410b22a-78af-6d2d-831f-950544c90442@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 2:44:04 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>>>>>>>> <af882755-0d7c-5921-264c-6c77fe3f27bf@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
>>>>>>>>>> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> marika wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of swing states. It’s being reported as “she knows she won’t win those, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>> she’s going for the margins, ie to “lose by less”.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But still lost PA overall.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What difference does that make?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> How does ‘losing by less’ help win the state? Does it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Making dinner and watching the finale of “The Refugees”
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
>>>>>>>>>> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
>>>>>>>>>> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
>>>>>>>>>> they are enjoying.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
>>>>>>>>>> not lamb).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
>>>>>>>>>> felt like it. LOL!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> snit, are you a girl??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope. But I bake and cook quite a bit. Also do a lot of "MacGyverish" home
>>>>>>>> repairs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> oh ok, sometimes its hard for me to know. i tune my responses
>>>>>>> based on if its a girl or not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> why?? becuase women are sensitive dude, you have to finnese. they
>>>>> block me for no reason and then they say hi the next.
>>>>
>>>> This is not a dating site. :)
>>>>
>>>
>>> i know, but i am not a stone.
>>
>> What makes you think women are more sensitive?
>>
>
>
> it is a fact of nature. women are sensitive. they are not
> operating on the same league as us.

I see it as two overlapping bell curves... sure there are differences in
general, but to assume someone is one way or another based on gender alone is
not enough for me. I treat people as they treat me ... and better.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <6715384d$0$3068676$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Oct 20, 2024 at 8:03:35 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
> <614e8f2e-9df3-bf59-44b1-2cddbe411ad5@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>
> > Snit wrote:
> >> On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:48:19 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
> >> <656ff168-569e-ff25-4921-9f7cecce2273@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
> >>
> >>> Snit wrote:
> >>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:30:05 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
> >>>> <24a4eba9-6193-8c3a-9fc3-98b6960ebde8@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Snit wrote:
> >>>>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 7:16:33 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
> >>>>>> <c410b22a-78af-6d2d-831f-950544c90442@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Snit wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 2:44:04 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
> >>>>>>>> <af882755-0d7c-5921-264c-6c77fe3f27bf@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Snit wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 6:49:05 PM MST, "marika" wrote
> >>>>>>>>>> <lkZQO.87894$7OO5.80496@fx43.iad>:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> marika wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> boo hoo and waah wahh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> fuckin lets see how it goes cunts!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So perhaps you know, Kamala is doing a lot of campaigning in red counties
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> of swing states. It?s being reported as ?she knows she won?t win those, but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> she?s going for the margins, ie to ?lose by less?.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> How does that help, losing by less?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So for example, say trump won 60-40 in Luzerne county PA last time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But still lost PA overall.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamala campaigns in Luzerne, so this year (hypothetically) loses there to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> trump only 55-45 this time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> What difference does that make?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> How does ?losing by less? help win the state? Does it?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> marika, what are you doing tonight?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Making dinner and watching the finale of ?The Refugees?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> What did you make for dinner? I had fun today and made cheesecake filled
> >>>>>>>>>> chocolate chip cookies. Never made them before. Likely won't again. They are
> >>>>>>>>>> not bad, but a lot of work and too rich. But I made them for others... and
> >>>>>>>>>> they are enjoying.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Also made a Shepherd's Pie (or technically Cottage Pie because I used beef and
> >>>>>>>>>> not lamb).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Still have a bit of leftover veggie lasagna... so did not need to make it but
> >>>>>>>>>> felt like it. LOL!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> snit, are you a girl??
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Nope. But I bake and cook quite a bit. Also do a lot of "MacGyverish" home
> >>>>>>>> repairs.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> oh ok, sometimes its hard for me to know. i tune my responses
> >>>>>>> based on if its a girl or not.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Why?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> why?? becuase women are sensitive dude, you have to finnese. they
> >>>>> block me for no reason and then they say hi the next.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is not a dating site. :)
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> i know, but i am not a stone.
> >>
> >> What makes you think women are more sensitive?
> >>
> >
> >
> > it is a fact of nature. women are sensitive. they are not
> > operating on the same league as us.
>
> I see it as two overlapping bell curves... sure there are differences in
> general, but to assume someone is one way or another based on gender alone is
> not enough for me. I treat people as they treat me ... and better.

Stick to your day job. Comedy isn't for you.