On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 17:33:27 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>It was a fraud and everyone knows it.

Prove it.

--
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 16 days.

55) Trump vowed to protect American jobs, but offshoring
increased, and manufacturing fell.

56) Trump said he would fix America's infrastructure but it
never happened. He announced so many failed "infrastructure weeks",
they became a running joke! White House reporter,
"Since it’s infrastructure week..." (Laughter is the press room)
(To Sarah Huckabee) "*Is* it infrastructure week?"

On 17 Oct 2024 21:36:52 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

>When there were two old senile candidates the media focused on that. Now that
>there is only one it is like they have forgotten it.

Your point illustrates the lie that the MSM is biased towards the left. If they
were, they'd be making lots of hay over Trump's mutterings, mumblings and
missteps.

--
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 16 days.

55) Trump vowed to protect American jobs, but offshoring
increased, and manufacturing fell.

56) Trump said he would fix America's infrastructure but it
never happened. He announced so many failed "infrastructure weeks",
they became a running joke! White House reporter,
"Since it’s infrastructure week..." (Laughter is the press room)
(To Sarah Huckabee) "*Is* it infrastructure week?"

On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 17:46:36 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:

>In article <6711a074$2$2752$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 4:32:36 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>> <67119e96$2$212410$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>
>> The point is a solid one: When Trump and Biden were competing head to head
>> there was a lot of focus on how both are senile old dudes who are not
>> competent. Biden did the right thing and stepped aside. The story was not
>> killed -- there still is one old senile dude in the race. Why is that topic
>> now taboo?
>>
>> Do you have a relevant reply? If not best we just end the conversation.
>
>I already replied Rudy wannabe. You are only seeking attention.

No you didn't. You ran away. You have not yet commented on the above media
situation. This is probably because you aren't intelligent or educated enough
to form a cogent reply so you spew some emotional one liner in an attempt to
make somebody else feel bad.

By definition, you're an asshole.

--
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 16 days.

55) Trump vowed to protect American jobs, but offshoring
increased, and manufacturing fell.

56) Trump said he would fix America's infrastructure but it
never happened. He announced so many failed "infrastructure weeks",
they became a running joke! White House reporter,
"Since it’s infrastructure week..." (Laughter is the press room)
(To Sarah Huckabee) "*Is* it infrastructure week?"

On 17 Oct 2024 23:40:40 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Oct 17, 2024 at 4:35:43?PM MST, "pothead" wrote
><ves70f$2urbc$1@dont-email.me>:
>
>> On 2024-10-17, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>> In article <6711981d$0$2759$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:56:57 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>> <67119624$4$3834$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <67118cd0$2$2873018$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:01:38 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>> <6711892d$0$3832$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <67118374$0$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>> I can feel it too. Same atmosphere as with the Joe vs Trump. They aren't
>>>>>>>>> even trying.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When there were two old senile candidates the media focused on that. Now that
>>>>>>>> there is only one it is like they have forgotten it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That doesn't have a damn thing to do with what I said. Stop trolling.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Whoooooosh!
>>>>>
>>>>> and he concedes.
>>>>
>>>> Why is you trolls feel the need to speak for others and dodge so many relevant
>>>> points. LOL!
>>>
>>> You ran away.
>>>>
>>>> The point is a solid one: When Trump and Biden were competing head to head
>>>> there was a lot of focus on how both are senile old dudes who are not
>>>> competent. Biden did the right thing and stepped aside. The story was not
>>>> killed -- there still is one old senile dude in the race. Why is that topic
>>>> now taboo?
>>>
>>>
>>> Biden was replaced like a toilet seat. You know this.
>>>
>> Snit doesn't own a toilet seat.
>> Snit prefers to piss on his cat.
>> I am not kidding.
>>
>> Ask him.
>
>Your trolling was more interesting in the past.

I think he's getting tired. So is Skeeter.

I wore them out until they filtered me out of fear. They will soon filter you
as well when they realize you will always win every debate.

--
Reinstate the Fairness Doctrine

Two more reasons to not vote for Trump in 16 days.

55) Trump vowed to protect American jobs, but offshoring
increased, and manufacturing fell.

56) Trump said he would fix America's infrastructure but it
never happened. He announced so many failed "infrastructure weeks",
they became a running joke! White House reporter,
"Since it’s infrastructure week..." (Laughter is the press room)
(To Sarah Huckabee) "*Is* it infrastructure week?"

Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2024 at 1:36:21 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
> <versg5$2stfd$2@dont-email.me>:
>
>> On 2024-10-17, P. Coonan <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>> On 17 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
>>> news:1lj2hjdh81bp6l51k7lm780n4mld88clag@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> This shouldn't be a surprise. Even to the morons at msnbc.
>>>>
>>>> 'MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State, Struggles To
>>>> Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris'
>>>>
>>>> <https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/16/msnbc-arizona-early-voting-kamala-harris/>
>>>>
>>>> 'NBC News correspondent Vaughn Hillyard said Wednesday that not one
>>>> early voter interviewed by his team in the battleground state of
>>>> Arizona admitted they were voting for Vice President Kamala Harris.
>>>>
>>>> Republicans are voting by mail or returning their ballots early at a
>>>> two-to-one margin over Democrats, though Democrats outpaced
>>>> Republicans with early voting in 2020, Hillyard said on “Jose-Diaz
>>>> Balart Reports.” Not a single voter lining up at the polling
>>>> locations in Mohave County openly said they were voting for Harris,
>>>> the NBC correspondent added.
>>>>
>>>> “We went to a couple early voting locations, and we saw lengthy
>>>> lines during the lunch hour. Thirty people waiting in line, and we
>>>> should note, we did not find a single person who audibly would tell us
>>>> that they voted for Kamala Harris,” Hillyard said. “These were
>>>> Trump supporters getting out to vote early in the all-important Mohave
>>>> County.”
>>>>
>>>> WATCH:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> One supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump named Jim Coddington
>>>> said that voters are making a “special effort” to vote this year
>>>> and that it is important for those to come out early. Shelley Schwarz,
>>>> a voter in Mohave County, said she voted early for the first time ever
>>>> because Trump encouraged voters to do so. (RELATED: Democrats’
>>>> Championing Of Early Voting Could Come Back To Haunt Them)
>>>>
>>>> “He keeps saying it, and I’ve been thinking about it, and so here
>>>> I am,” Schwarz said.
>>>>
>>>> Another voter said he did not vote in 2020 but voted early in 2024
>>>> because he is “horrified by the state of the country,” Hillyard
>>>> said. Three other voters he spoke to said they moved to Arizona from
>>>> blue states to support Trump.
>>>>
>>>> Trump is currently ahead in Arizona, 49% to 47%, according to The New
>>>> York Times. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state in 2020 by less
>>>> than one point, 49.4% to 49.1%, while the former president won the
>>>> state against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 49.5% to 45.4%
>>>> in 2016
>>>
>>> We're going to see a repeat of the Hillary Clinton chokefest and shocked
>>> expressions on CBS talking heads.
>>
>> I sure hope so, however the demoncrats have been plotting their
>> cheating methods for 4 years so who knows what they have up their
>> sleeves this time.
>
> Where do you get these wild stories?
>

Why vote if you can stay home, smoke some weed, and let your candidate
falsify the results

In article <7AXQO.258553$EEm7.139728@fx16.iad>, marika5000@gmail.com
says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
> > On 2024-10-17, P. Coonan <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> On 17 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
> >> news:1lj2hjdh81bp6l51k7lm780n4mld88clag@4ax.com:
> >>
> >>> This shouldn't be a surprise. Even to the morons at msnbc.
> >>>
> >>> 'MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State, Struggles To
> >>> Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris'
> >>>
> >>> <https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/16/msnbc-arizona-early-voting-kamala-ha
> >>> rris/>
> >>>
> >>> 'NBC News correspondent Vaughn Hillyard said Wednesday that not one
> >>> early voter interviewed by his team in the battleground state of
> >>> Arizona admitted they were voting for Vice President Kamala Harris.
> >>>
> >>> Republicans are voting by mail or returning their ballots early at a
> >>> two-to-one margin over Democrats, though Democrats outpaced
> >>> Republicans with early voting in 2020, Hillyard said on ?Jose-Diaz
> >>> Balart Reports.? Not a single voter lining up at the polling
> >>> locations in Mohave County openly said they were voting for Harris,
> >>> the NBC correspondent added.
> >>>
> >>> ?We went to a couple early voting locations, and we saw lengthy
> >>> lines during the lunch hour. Thirty people waiting in line, and we
> >>> should note, we did not find a single person who audibly would tell us
> >>> that they voted for Kamala Harris,? Hillyard said. ?These were
> >>> Trump supporters getting out to vote early in the all-important Mohave
> >>> County.?
> >>>
> >>> WATCH:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> One supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump named Jim Coddington
> >>> said that voters are making a ?special effort? to vote this year
> >>> and that it is important for those to come out early. Shelley Schwarz,
> >>> a voter in Mohave County, said she voted early for the first time ever
> >>> because Trump encouraged voters to do so. (RELATED: Democrats?
> >>> Championing Of Early Voting Could Come Back To Haunt Them)
> >>>
> >>> ?He keeps saying it, and I?ve been thinking about it, and so here
> >>> I am,? Schwarz said.
> >>>
> >>> Another voter said he did not vote in 2020 but voted early in 2024
> >>> because he is ?horrified by the state of the country,? Hillyard
> >>> said. Three other voters he spoke to said they moved to Arizona from
> >>> blue states to support Trump.
> >>>
> >>> Trump is currently ahead in Arizona, 49% to 47%, according to The New
> >>> York Times. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state in 2020 by less
> >>> than one point, 49.4% to 49.1%, while the former president won the
> >>> state against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 49.5% to 45.4%
> >>> in 2016
> >>
> >> We're going to see a repeat of the Hillary Clinton chokefest and shocked
> >> expressions on CBS talking heads.
> >
> > I sure hope so, however the demoncrats have been plotting their
> > cheating methods for 4 years so who knows what they have up their
> > sleeves this time.
> >
> >
>
>
> You should watch the Lev Parnas documentary someday if you get the chance.
> All the criming by Trump and supporters is absolutely staggering, and so
> many people knew about it. But it was pretty ham-fisted. How could someone
> as sloppy as trump is, get away with so much? I can?t believe even more
> now, that this person was ever president and MIGHT BE AGAIN!!!
>
> Anyway, Maddow does NOT appear (or even speak) in the show. It?s mostly
> just Lev doing all the talking (and his wife, and just a couple other
> people).
> And Lev tells a good story

You already said that once.

In article <RtYQO.283911$kxD8.115503@fx11.iad>, marika5000@gmail.com
says...
>
> Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Oct 17, 2024 at 1:36:21 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
> > <versg5$2stfd$2@dont-email.me>:
> >
> >> On 2024-10-17, P. Coonan <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>> On 17 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
> >>> news:1lj2hjdh81bp6l51k7lm780n4mld88clag@4ax.com:
> >>>
> >>>> This shouldn't be a surprise. Even to the morons at msnbc.
> >>>>
> >>>> 'MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State, Struggles To
> >>>> Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris'
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/16/msnbc-arizona-early-voting-kamala-harris/>
> >>>>
> >>>> 'NBC News correspondent Vaughn Hillyard said Wednesday that not one
> >>>> early voter interviewed by his team in the battleground state of
> >>>> Arizona admitted they were voting for Vice President Kamala Harris.
> >>>>
> >>>> Republicans are voting by mail or returning their ballots early at a
> >>>> two-to-one margin over Democrats, though Democrats outpaced
> >>>> Republicans with early voting in 2020, Hillyard said on ?Jose-Diaz
> >>>> Balart Reports.? Not a single voter lining up at the polling
> >>>> locations in Mohave County openly said they were voting for Harris,
> >>>> the NBC correspondent added.
> >>>>
> >>>> ?We went to a couple early voting locations, and we saw lengthy
> >>>> lines during the lunch hour. Thirty people waiting in line, and we
> >>>> should note, we did not find a single person who audibly would tell us
> >>>> that they voted for Kamala Harris,? Hillyard said. ?These were
> >>>> Trump supporters getting out to vote early in the all-important Mohave
> >>>> County.?
> >>>>
> >>>> WATCH:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> One supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump named Jim Coddington
> >>>> said that voters are making a ?special effort? to vote this year
> >>>> and that it is important for those to come out early. Shelley Schwarz,
> >>>> a voter in Mohave County, said she voted early for the first time ever
> >>>> because Trump encouraged voters to do so. (RELATED: Democrats?
> >>>> Championing Of Early Voting Could Come Back To Haunt Them)
> >>>>
> >>>> ?He keeps saying it, and I?ve been thinking about it, and so here
> >>>> I am,? Schwarz said.
> >>>>
> >>>> Another voter said he did not vote in 2020 but voted early in 2024
> >>>> because he is ?horrified by the state of the country,? Hillyard
> >>>> said. Three other voters he spoke to said they moved to Arizona from
> >>>> blue states to support Trump.
> >>>>
> >>>> Trump is currently ahead in Arizona, 49% to 47%, according to The New
> >>>> York Times. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state in 2020 by less
> >>>> than one point, 49.4% to 49.1%, while the former president won the
> >>>> state against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 49.5% to 45.4%
> >>>> in 2016
> >>>
> >>> We're going to see a repeat of the Hillary Clinton chokefest and shocked
> >>> expressions on CBS talking heads.
> >>
> >> I sure hope so, however the demoncrats have been plotting their
> >> cheating methods for 4 years so who knows what they have up their
> >> sleeves this time.
> >
> > Where do you get these wild stories?
> >
>
> Why vote if you can stay home, smoke some weed, and let your candidate
> falsify the results

True in his case. He's a liberal.

On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:21:30 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<86j8hjtni3adll1gogh8jatgbq0mk8k4a5@4ax.com>:

> On 17 Oct 2024 23:40:40 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 4:35:43?PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>> <ves70f$2urbc$1@dont-email.me>:
>>
>>> On 2024-10-17, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>> In article <6711981d$0$2759$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:56:57 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>> <67119624$4$3834$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <67118cd0$2$2873018$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:01:38 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>> <6711892d$0$3832$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <67118374$0$2757$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>> I can feel it too. Same atmosphere as with the Joe vs Trump. They aren't
>>>>>>>>>> even trying.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When there were two old senile candidates the media focused on that. Now that
>>>>>>>>> there is only one it is like they have forgotten it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That doesn't have a damn thing to do with what I said. Stop trolling.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Whoooooosh!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and he concedes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is you trolls feel the need to speak for others and dodge so many relevant
>>>>> points. LOL!
>>>>
>>>> You ran away.
>>>>>
>>>>> The point is a solid one: When Trump and Biden were competing head to head
>>>>> there was a lot of focus on how both are senile old dudes who are not
>>>>> competent. Biden did the right thing and stepped aside. The story was not
>>>>> killed -- there still is one old senile dude in the race. Why is that topic
>>>>> now taboo?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Biden was replaced like a toilet seat. You know this.
>>>>
>>> Snit doesn't own a toilet seat.
>>> Snit prefers to piss on his cat.
>>> I am not kidding.
>>>
>>> Ask him.
>>
>> Your trolling was more interesting in the past.
>
> I think he's getting tired. So is Skeeter.
>
> I wore them out until they filtered me out of fear. They will soon filter you
> as well when they realize you will always win every debate.

They do not care if they win... they just want attention.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:19:39 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<91j8hj9k04n1pifu59dqmdi6louop7cg9f@4ax.com>:

> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 17:46:36 -0600, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <6711a074$2$2752$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 4:32:36 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>> <67119e96$2$212410$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>
>>> The point is a solid one: When Trump and Biden were competing head to head
>>> there was a lot of focus on how both are senile old dudes who are not
>>> competent. Biden did the right thing and stepped aside. The story was not
>>> killed -- there still is one old senile dude in the race. Why is that topic
>>> now taboo?
>>>
>>> Do you have a relevant reply? If not best we just end the conversation.
>>
>> I already replied Rudy wannabe. You are only seeking attention.
>
> No you didn't. You ran away. You have not yet commented on the above media
> situation. This is probably because you aren't intelligent or educated enough
> to form a cogent reply so you spew some emotional one liner in an attempt to
> make somebody else feel bad.

Very well stated.
>
> By definition, you're an asshole.

And 100% correct.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:16:18 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<hsi8hj5d59bilbsfk7eid3s5caumii5i39@4ax.com>:

> On 17 Oct 2024 21:36:52 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> When there were two old senile candidates the media focused on that. Now that
>> there is only one it is like they have forgotten it.
>
> Your point illustrates the lie that the MSM is biased towards the left. If
> they
> were, they'd be making lots of hay over Trump's mutterings, mumblings and
> missteps.

Exactly. They are biased to get ratings. This means often speaking to the
people -- who overall are generally liberal -- to doing ANYTHING to get
ratings. Or for Fox and the like being insane propaganda (far, far more than
other news stations).

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:02:22 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
<n1i8hjdmk37tpgbd4n41iis3j1au373j2r@4ax.com>:

> On 17 Oct 2024 20:38:13 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 1:36:21?PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>> <versg5$2stfd$2@dont-email.me>:
>>
>>> On 2024-10-17, P. Coonan <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>> On 17 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>> news:1lj2hjdh81bp6l51k7lm780n4mld88clag@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> This shouldn't be a surprise. Even to the morons at msnbc.
>>>>>
>>>>> 'MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State, Struggles To
>>>>> Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris'
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/16/msnbc-arizona-early-voting-kamala-harris/>
>>>>>
>>>>> 'NBC News correspondent Vaughn Hillyard said Wednesday that not one
>>>>> early voter interviewed by his team in the battleground state of
>>>>> Arizona admitted they were voting for Vice President Kamala Harris.
>>>>>
>>>>> Republicans are voting by mail or returning their ballots early at a
>>>>> two-to-one margin over Democrats, though Democrats outpaced
>>>>> Republicans with early voting in 2020, Hillyard said on “Jose-Diaz
>>>>> Balart Reports.” Not a single voter lining up at the polling
>>>>> locations in Mohave County openly said they were voting for Harris,
>>>>> the NBC correspondent added.
>>>>>
>>>>> “We went to a couple early voting locations, and we saw lengthy
>>>>> lines during the lunch hour. Thirty people waiting in line, and we
>>>>> should note, we did not find a single person who audibly would tell us
>>>>> that they voted for Kamala Harris,” Hillyard said. “These were
>>>>> Trump supporters getting out to vote early in the all-important Mohave
>>>>> County.”
>>>>>
>>>>> WATCH:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> One supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump named Jim Coddington
>>>>> said that voters are making a “special effort” to vote this year
>>>>> and that it is important for those to come out early. Shelley Schwarz,
>>>>> a voter in Mohave County, said she voted early for the first time ever
>>>>> because Trump encouraged voters to do so. (RELATED: Democrats’
>>>>> Championing Of Early Voting Could Come Back To Haunt Them)
>>>>>
>>>>> “He keeps saying it, and I’ve been thinking about it, and so here
>>>>> I am,” Schwarz said.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another voter said he did not vote in 2020 but voted early in 2024
>>>>> because he is “horrified by the state of the country,” Hillyard
>>>>> said. Three other voters he spoke to said they moved to Arizona from
>>>>> blue states to support Trump.
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump is currently ahead in Arizona, 49% to 47%, according to The New
>>>>> York Times. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state in 2020 by less
>>>>> than one point, 49.4% to 49.1%, while the former president won the
>>>>> state against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 49.5% to 45.4%
>>>>> in 2016
>>>>
>>>> We're going to see a repeat of the Hillary Clinton chokefest and shocked
>>>> expressions on CBS talking heads.
>>>
>>> I sure hope so, however the demoncrats have been plotting their
>>> cheating methods for 4 years so who knows what they have up their
>>> sleeves this time.
>>
>> Where do you get these wild stories?
>
> Any Republican accusation is, in fact, a confession.

Yup. I have noted the same for me harasser... who is also a Trump cultist.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <671175b5$2$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 1:36:21 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>> <versg5$2stfd$2@dont-email.me>:
>>
>>> On 2024-10-17, P. Coonan <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>> On 17 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>> news:1lj2hjdh81bp6l51k7lm780n4mld88clag@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>> This shouldn't be a surprise. Even to the morons at msnbc.
>>>>>
>>>>> 'MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State, Struggles To
>>>>> Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris'
>>>>>
>>>>> <https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/16/msnbc-arizona-early-voting-kamala-harris/>
>>>>>
>>>>> 'NBC News correspondent Vaughn Hillyard said Wednesday that not one
>>>>> early voter interviewed by his team in the battleground state of
>>>>> Arizona admitted they were voting for Vice President Kamala Harris.
>>>>>
>>>>> Republicans are voting by mail or returning their ballots early at a
>>>>> two-to-one margin over Democrats, though Democrats outpaced
>>>>> Republicans with early voting in 2020, Hillyard said on ?Jose-Diaz
>>>>> Balart Reports.? Not a single voter lining up at the polling
>>>>> locations in Mohave County openly said they were voting for Harris,
>>>>> the NBC correspondent added.
>>>>>
>>>>> ?We went to a couple early voting locations, and we saw lengthy
>>>>> lines during the lunch hour. Thirty people waiting in line, and we
>>>>> should note, we did not find a single person who audibly would tell us
>>>>> that they voted for Kamala Harris,? Hillyard said. ?These were
>>>>> Trump supporters getting out to vote early in the all-important Mohave
>>>>> County.?
>>>>>
>>>>> WATCH:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> One supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump named Jim Coddington
>>>>> said that voters are making a ?special effort? to vote this year
>>>>> and that it is important for those to come out early. Shelley Schwarz,
>>>>> a voter in Mohave County, said she voted early for the first time ever
>>>>> because Trump encouraged voters to do so. (RELATED: Democrats?
>>>>> Championing Of Early Voting Could Come Back To Haunt Them)
>>>>>
>>>>> ?He keeps saying it, and I?ve been thinking about it, and so here
>>>>> I am,? Schwarz said.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another voter said he did not vote in 2020 but voted early in 2024
>>>>> because he is ?horrified by the state of the country,? Hillyard
>>>>> said. Three other voters he spoke to said they moved to Arizona from
>>>>> blue states to support Trump.
>>>>>
>>>>> Trump is currently ahead in Arizona, 49% to 47%, according to The New
>>>>> York Times. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state in 2020 by less
>>>>> than one point, 49.4% to 49.1%, while the former president won the
>>>>> state against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 49.5% to 45.4%
>>>>> in 2016
>>>>
>>>> We're going to see a repeat of the Hillary Clinton chokefest and shocked
>>>> expressions on CBS talking heads.
>>>
>>> I sure hope so, however the demoncrats have been plotting their
>>> cheating methods for 4 years so who knows what they have up their
>>> sleeves this time.
>>
>> Where do you get these wild stories?
>
> Stay blind.
>

I always wonder why the MAGAs, whackadoodles, and a variety of other right
wing lunatics are always so willing to post their own stupidity for the
entire world to see.
Vocabulary, spelling, grammar, science, history, and now math…They
consistently out-stupid the libs by at least 5:1

https://x.com/_esoomoose_/status/1775923756147286491?s=61&t=ZCHyRu4DjWNZf_cm3_DB6A

In article <9CZQO.13918$tnK2.9540@fx04.iad>, marika5000@gmail.com
says...
>
> Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> > In article <671175b5$2$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Oct 17, 2024 at 1:36:21 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
> >> <versg5$2stfd$2@dont-email.me>:
> >>
> >>> On 2024-10-17, P. Coonan <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 17 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
> >>>> news:1lj2hjdh81bp6l51k7lm780n4mld88clag@4ax.com:
> >>>>
> >>>>> This shouldn't be a surprise. Even to the morons at msnbc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 'MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State, Struggles To
> >>>>> Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris'
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/16/msnbc-arizona-early-voting-kamala-harris/>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 'NBC News correspondent Vaughn Hillyard said Wednesday that not one
> >>>>> early voter interviewed by his team in the battleground state of
> >>>>> Arizona admitted they were voting for Vice President Kamala Harris.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Republicans are voting by mail or returning their ballots early at a
> >>>>> two-to-one margin over Democrats, though Democrats outpaced
> >>>>> Republicans with early voting in 2020, Hillyard said on ?Jose-Diaz
> >>>>> Balart Reports.? Not a single voter lining up at the polling
> >>>>> locations in Mohave County openly said they were voting for Harris,
> >>>>> the NBC correspondent added.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ?We went to a couple early voting locations, and we saw lengthy
> >>>>> lines during the lunch hour. Thirty people waiting in line, and we
> >>>>> should note, we did not find a single person who audibly would tell us
> >>>>> that they voted for Kamala Harris,? Hillyard said. ?These were
> >>>>> Trump supporters getting out to vote early in the all-important Mohave
> >>>>> County.?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> WATCH:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> One supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump named Jim Coddington
> >>>>> said that voters are making a ?special effort? to vote this year
> >>>>> and that it is important for those to come out early. Shelley Schwarz,
> >>>>> a voter in Mohave County, said she voted early for the first time ever
> >>>>> because Trump encouraged voters to do so. (RELATED: Democrats?
> >>>>> Championing Of Early Voting Could Come Back To Haunt Them)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ?He keeps saying it, and I?ve been thinking about it, and so here
> >>>>> I am,? Schwarz said.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Another voter said he did not vote in 2020 but voted early in 2024
> >>>>> because he is ?horrified by the state of the country,? Hillyard
> >>>>> said. Three other voters he spoke to said they moved to Arizona from
> >>>>> blue states to support Trump.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Trump is currently ahead in Arizona, 49% to 47%, according to The New
> >>>>> York Times. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state in 2020 by less
> >>>>> than one point, 49.4% to 49.1%, while the former president won the
> >>>>> state against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 49.5% to 45.4%
> >>>>> in 2016
> >>>>
> >>>> We're going to see a repeat of the Hillary Clinton chokefest and shocked
> >>>> expressions on CBS talking heads.
> >>>
> >>> I sure hope so, however the demoncrats have been plotting their
> >>> cheating methods for 4 years so who knows what they have up their
> >>> sleeves this time.
> >>
> >> Where do you get these wild stories?
> >
> > Stay blind.
> >
>
> I always wonder why the MAGAs, whackadoodles, and a variety of other right
> wing lunatics are always so willing to post their own stupidity for the
> entire world to see.
> Vocabulary, spelling, grammar, science, history, and now math?They
> consistently out-stupid the libs by at least 5:1
>
> https://x.com/_esoomoose_/status/1775923756147286491?s=61&t=ZCHyRu4DjWNZf_cm3_DB6A

Is that the best you got?

Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2024 at 4:33:27 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
> <67119ec8$5$212404$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>
>> In article <67119b50$4$1895505$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 4:09:13 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>> <671198e6$4$2756$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>
>>>> In article <67119743$4$2758$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:58:28 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>> <6711967e$5$3826$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <67118ce8$1$2873018$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 3:00:38 PM MST, "Skeeter" wrote
>>>>>>> <671188f1$0$3829$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In article <671180d7$0$1895500$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 2:14:18 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>>> <verun9$2tegq$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <671175b5$2$2873000$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>>>>>>>>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 17, 2024 at 1:36:21 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>> <versg5$2stfd$2@dont-email.me>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-10-17, P. Coonan <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:1lj2hjdh81bp6l51k7lm780n4mld88clag@4ax.com:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This shouldn't be a surprise. Even to the morons at msnbc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State, Struggles To
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/16/msnbc-arizona-early-voting-kamala-harris/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'NBC News correspondent Vaughn Hillyard said Wednesday that not one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> early voter interviewed by his team in the battleground state of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arizona admitted they were voting for Vice President Kamala Harris.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans are voting by mail or returning their ballots early at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two-to-one margin over Democrats, though Democrats outpaced
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Republicans with early voting in 2020, Hillyard said on ?Jose-Diaz
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Balart Reports.? Not a single voter lining up at the polling
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> locations in Mohave County openly said they were voting for Harris,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the NBC correspondent added.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?We went to a couple early voting locations, and we saw lengthy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lines during the lunch hour. Thirty people waiting in line, and we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should note, we did not find a single person who audibly would tell us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that they voted for Kamala Harris,? Hillyard said. ?These were
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump supporters getting out to vote early in the all-important Mohave
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> County.?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WATCH:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump named Jim Coddington
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said that voters are making a ?special effort? to vote this year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and that it is important for those to come out early. Shelley Schwarz,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a voter in Mohave County, said she voted early for the first time ever
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because Trump encouraged voters to do so. (RELATED: Democrats?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Championing Of Early Voting Could Come Back To Haunt Them)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?He keeps saying it, and I?ve been thinking about it, and so here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am,? Schwarz said.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Another voter said he did not vote in 2020 but voted early in 2024
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because he is ?horrified by the state of the country,? Hillyard
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said. Three other voters he spoke to said they moved to Arizona from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blue states to support Trump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trump is currently ahead in Arizona, 49% to 47%, according to The New
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> York Times. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state in 2020 by less
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> than one point, 49.4% to 49.1%, while the former president won the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> state against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 49.5% to 45.4%
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in 2016
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We're going to see a repeat of the Hillary Clinton chokefest and shocked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> expressions on CBS talking heads.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I sure hope so, however the demoncrats have been plotting their
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cheating methods for 4 years so who knows what they have up their
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sleeves this time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Where do you get these wild stories?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Stay blind.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And stupid as well.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *Just a few anomalies regarding the 2020 election.*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1. Six states changed their election laws two months before the 2020
>>>>>>>>>> election by executive fiat, instead of going through the proper channels
>>>>>>>>>> in the legislature. That is a violation of their state constitutions and
>>>>>>>>>> that in and of itself is enough to invalidate the results of the 2020
>>>>>>>>>> election.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2. Mark Zuckerberg, hard left, spent $450 million dollars of private
>>>>>>>>>> money on our elections. After the 2020 election analysis revealed that
>>>>>>>>>> most of that money went to benefit Democrats.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 3. 6 swing states stopped counting the votes on election night for the
>>>>>>>>>> first time in American history. At the time that they stopped counting
>>>>>>>>>> the votes, Donald Trump was ahead of Biden in each of them.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 4. The unelected tech oligarchs in conjunction with the FBI in this
>>>>>>>>>> country censored a very important story about Hunter Biden?s laptop and
>>>>>>>>>> Joe Biden?s corruption. People who worked in the intelligence community,
>>>>>>>>>> came out and said it was Russian disinformation only to have that laptop
>>>>>>>>>> be admitted into evidence as part of an FBI investigation and criminal
>>>>>>>>>> prosecution of Hunter Biden. Polling after the election showed that if
>>>>>>>>>> people knew about the Hunter Biden laptop story it would?ve changed 17%
>>>>>>>>>> of the vote.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 5. 2,036,041 ballots were touched by anomalies.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 6. 923 American citizens filled out affidavits alleging voter fraud, and
>>>>>>>>>> signed them under penalties of perjury.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 7. 50 plus courts blocked evidentiary hearings into the alleged fraud
>>>>>>>>>> found in 2020.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 8. Prior to 2020 there were four other contested elections, one in
>>>>>>>>>> Florida, one in the 78th district of Missouri, one in the ninth district
>>>>>>>>>> of North Carolina, and one in the 22nd district of New York. In every
>>>>>>>>>> single one of those four instances, there was an evidentiary hearing. In
>>>>>>>>>> the 2020 election, there was no evidentiary hearing. For the first time
>>>>>>>>>> in American history.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 9. No election contest in American history has had 923 fact witnesses
>>>>>>>>>> sign under penalties of perjury and stake their personal freedom in
>>>>>>>>>> testimony to attest to the irregularities and legal issues found in
>>>>>>>>>> various states.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 10. 37 states in the United States of America altered their absentee or
>>>>>>>>>> mail in ballots ballot integrity procedures before the 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 11. If those 37 states used the same ballot integrity procedures that
>>>>>>>>>> they used in 2018, swing states would?ve found an upwards of 30,000 more
>>>>>>>>>> ineligible ballots.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 12. In Pennsylvania, counties allowed new ballots to be filled out after
>>>>>>>>>> the election.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 13. Any one of those is enough to say that there was enough fraud in the
>>>>>>>>>> 2020 election to doubt the outcome. Can I prove Donald Trump would?ve
>>>>>>>>>> won the election if the Democrats hadn?t cheated? No I can?t prove a
>>>>>>>>>> counter-narrative, but I can tell you that this amount of fraud leads
>>>>>>>>>> any reasonable person to the conclusion that Joe Biden didn?t win.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The insurrection therefore was on 11/3/2020.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1/6 was a lawful protest with permits that got out of hand. Unlike
>>>>>>>>>> Democrats who spent 10 months burning down this country to the tune of
>>>>>>>>>> $2 billion dollars, and injuring 740 police officers nationwide, the
>>>>>>>>>> capital riot had a couple million dollars in damages, 140 police
>>>>>>>>>> officers that were injured and zero deaths. Except the 3 Trump
>>>>>>>>>> supporters who were unarmed and killed without any investigation by the
>>>>>>>>>> corrupt government.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Anybody who is clutching their pearls about January 6 without mentioning
>>>>>>>>>> the fact that there was a large federal presence and many anomalies that
>>>>>>>>>> have yet to be answered is a liar and a partisan hack.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You sound like an uninformed stage 10 TDS patient who needs to detox
>>>>>>>>>> from CNN and MSNBC.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You can endorse the cackling communist from California, but..don?t you
>>>>>>>>>> dare pretend like the reason why you?re doing it is because Donald Trump
>>>>>>>>>> did something wrong.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Let?s break down and address these claims one by one:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Claim 1: States changing election laws by executive fiat
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It?s true that some states changed voting procedures before the 2020 election
>>>>>>>>> due to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly to expand access to mail-in voting.
>>>>>>>>> However, these changes were largely made through emergency powers or by state
>>>>>>>>> election boards and officials, often with judicial review. In most cases, the
>>>>>>>>> courts ruled these changes were legal under state constitutions. Even in
>>>>>>>>> states where the legality was questioned, no court invalidated the election
>>>>>>>>> results based solely on these procedural changes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Claim 2: Mark Zuckerberg spent $450 million to benefit Democrats
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mark Zuckerberg and his wife donated to a non-partisan group, the Center for
>>>>>>>>> Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which provided funds to help local election
>>>>>>>>> offices run elections during the pandemic. While some of the funds went to
>>>>>>>>> areas that leaned Democrat (which are often more populous), Republican-leaning
>>>>>>>>> areas also received funds. There?s no evidence that this funding was used to
>>>>>>>>> favor one party over another.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Claim 3: 6 swing states stopped counting votes on election night
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In 2020, due to the unprecedented number of mail-in ballots, some states did
>>>>>>>>> stop counting votes temporarily on election night. This wasn?t a unique event
>>>>>>>>> in history?vote counting has often extended beyond election night in previous
>>>>>>>>> elections, especially in states with close races. Mail-in ballots take longer
>>>>>>>>> to process, and the delays were expected and announced beforehand. Trump?s
>>>>>>>>> early lead in some states was due to the ?red mirage? phenomenon, where
>>>>>>>>> same-day in-person votes (which leaned Republican) were counted first,
>>>>>>>>> followed by mail-in ballots (which leaned Democrat).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Claim 4: Hunter Biden laptop story and censorship
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Hunter Biden laptop story was published just weeks before the 2020
>>>>>>>>> election. Some media outlets and social media platforms took steps to limit
>>>>>>>>> its distribution, citing concerns about the authenticity of the information
>>>>>>>>> and potential foreign interference. While subsequent investigations confirmed
>>>>>>>>> that the laptop was part of a legitimate investigation into Hunter Biden,
>>>>>>>>> there is no evidence that the suppression of this story changed the election
>>>>>>>>> outcome. Polls suggesting otherwise are speculative.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Claim 5: 2 million ballots touched by anomalies
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This claim is vague and lacks concrete evidence. Many claims about voting
>>>>>>>>> anomalies have been thoroughly investigated, and none have shown widespread
>>>>>>>>> fraud that would alter the outcome of the election. Anomalies are common in
>>>>>>>>> every election, but they are generally clerical or minor errors that do not
>>>>>>>>> affect the overall result.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Claim 6: 923 affidavits alleging voter fraud
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> While it?s true that some people signed affidavits, affidavits are not proof
>>>>>>>>> of fraud?they are simply statements by individuals. Many of these affidavits
>>>>>>>>> were dismissed by courts due to lack of evidence or because they described
>>>>>>>>> misunderstandings of normal election processes. Simply filing an affidavit
>>>>>>>>> does not prove fraud.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Claim 7: 50+ courts blocked evidentiary hearings
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Many courts rejected election fraud claims because the evidence presented was
>>>>>>>>> insufficient or non-existent. Courts didn?t block hearings out of bias but
>>>>>>>>> rather followed legal standards that require concrete evidence before
>>>>>>>>> proceeding. Most cases were dismissed because they didn?t meet the burden of
>>>>>>>>> proof.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Claim 8: No evidentiary hearing for the 2020 election
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There were numerous hearings and legal challenges related to the 2020
>>>>>>>>> election, including in key states like Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania. In
>>>>>>>>> most cases, judges found no credible evidence of widespread fraud. The idea
>>>>>>>>> that there was ?no evidentiary hearing? is false.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Claim 9: 923 fact witnesses signed under perjury
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> While hundreds of people may have signed affidavits, it?s important to note
>>>>>>>>> that many of these affidavits were dismissed by courts due to a lack of
>>>>>>>>> supporting evidence. An affidavit alone does not constitute proof, and many
>>>>>>>>> were based on misunderstandings or hearsay rather than direct knowledge of
>>>>>>>>> fraud.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Claim 10: 37 states altered absentee or mail-in ballot procedures
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, many states made adjustments to their mail-in voting procedures in
>>>>>>>>> response to the pandemic, which is entirely legal if done in accordance with
>>>>>>>>> state laws. These changes were made to ensure voter safety and accessibility.
>>>>>>>>> Courts generally upheld these changes as legal, with some minor exceptions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Claim 11: 30,000 more ineligible ballots in swing states
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence to support the claim that 30,000 ineligible ballots were
>>>>>>>>> cast in swing states. Audits and recounts in key states, including Georgia and
>>>>>>>>> Arizona, have consistently shown that the number of ineligible ballots was
>>>>>>>>> extremely low and nowhere near enough to affect the outcome of the election.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Claim 12: Pennsylvania allowed new ballots after the election
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This claim is false. Pennsylvania followed court-approved deadlines for
>>>>>>>>> accepting mail-in ballots that were postmarked by Election Day and received
>>>>>>>>> within a certain window after the election, which is a standard practice.
>>>>>>>>> There is no evidence that ballots were illegally counted after the election.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Claim 13: Any one of these is enough to invalidate the election
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Each of these claims has been investigated and largely debunked. While there
>>>>>>>>> were some procedural changes due to the pandemic, none of the claims provide
>>>>>>>>> credible evidence of widespread fraud that would invalidate the results of the
>>>>>>>>> 2020 election.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> January 6 vs. Summer 2020 Protests
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The January 6 attack was not a lawful protest. It was a violent breach of the
>>>>>>>>> U.S. Capitol aimed at overturning the results of a democratic election. There
>>>>>>>>> were investigations into the conduct of Capitol Police, but there is no
>>>>>>>>> evidence of a government cover-up of the deaths of protesters. In contrast,
>>>>>>>>> while the summer 2020 protests did lead to property damage and injuries, they
>>>>>>>>> were largely protests against police brutality, and widespread condemnation
>>>>>>>>> occurred when violence took place.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In summary, the 2020 election was one of the most scrutinized elections in
>>>>>>>>> U.S. history, with no credible evidence found to support claims of widespread
>>>>>>>>> fraud that would have changed the outcome. The claims made here have been
>>>>>>>>> widely investigated, with no proof supporting the narrative that the election
>>>>>>>>> was stolen.
>>>
>>> A shame you have no reasoned response not this content. That is OK, though,
>>> just means we have reached agreement -- the election was fair or at the very
>>> least there is no good evidence or reason to think it was not. Thank you.
>>
>> It was a fraud and everyone knows it.
>
> Everything is a fraud.
>

On 10/19/2024 4:49 PM, marika wrote:
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>> On 2024-10-17, P. Coonan <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>>> On 17 Oct 2024, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> posted some
>>> news:1lj2hjdh81bp6l51k7lm780n4mld88clag@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> This shouldn't be a surprise. Even to the morons at msnbc.
>>>>
>>>> 'MSNBC Interviews Early Voters In Key Battleground State, Struggles To
>>>> Find Anyone Who Voted For Harris'
>>>>
>>>> <https://dailycaller.com/2024/10/16/msnbc-arizona-early-voting-kamala-ha
>>>> rris/>
>>>>
>>>> 'NBC News correspondent Vaughn Hillyard said Wednesday that not one
>>>> early voter interviewed by his team in the battleground state of
>>>> Arizona admitted they were voting for Vice President Kamala Harris.
>>>>
>>>> Republicans are voting by mail or returning their ballots early at a
>>>> two-to-one margin over Democrats, though Democrats outpaced
>>>> Republicans with early voting in 2020, Hillyard said on “Jose-Diaz
>>>> Balart Reports.” Not a single voter lining up at the polling
>>>> locations in Mohave County openly said they were voting for Harris,
>>>> the NBC correspondent added.
>>>>
>>>> “We went to a couple early voting locations, and we saw lengthy
>>>> lines during the lunch hour. Thirty people waiting in line, and we
>>>> should note, we did not find a single person who audibly would tell us
>>>> that they voted for Kamala Harris,” Hillyard said. “These were
>>>> Trump supporters getting out to vote early in the all-important Mohave
>>>> County.”
>>>>
>>>> WATCH:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> One supporter of Republican nominee Donald Trump named Jim Coddington
>>>> said that voters are making a “special effort” to vote this year
>>>> and that it is important for those to come out early. Shelley Schwarz,
>>>> a voter in Mohave County, said she voted early for the first time ever
>>>> because Trump encouraged voters to do so. (RELATED: Democrats’
>>>> Championing Of Early Voting Could Come Back To Haunt Them)
>>>>
>>>> “He keeps saying it, and I’ve been thinking about it, and so here
>>>> I am,” Schwarz said.
>>>>
>>>> Another voter said he did not vote in 2020 but voted early in 2024
>>>> because he is “horrified by the state of the country,” Hillyard
>>>> said. Three other voters he spoke to said they moved to Arizona from
>>>> blue states to support Trump.
>>>>
>>>> Trump is currently ahead in Arizona, 49% to 47%, according to The New
>>>> York Times. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state in 2020 by less
>>>> than one point, 49.4% to 49.1%, while the former president won the
>>>> state against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 49.5% to 45.4%
>>>> in 2016
>>>
>>> We're going to see a repeat of the Hillary Clinton chokefest and shocked
>>> expressions on CBS talking heads.
>>
>> I sure hope so, however the demoncrats have been plotting their
>> cheating methods for 4 years so who knows what they have up their
>> sleeves this time.
>>
>>
>
>
> You should watch the Lev Parnas documentary someday if you get the chance.
> All the criming by Trump and supporters is absolutely staggering, and so
> many people knew about it. But it was pretty ham-fisted. How could someone
> as sloppy as trump is, get away with so much? I can’t believe even more
> now, that this person was ever president and MIGHT BE AGAIN!!!
>
> Anyway, Maddow does NOT appear (or even speak) in the show. It’s mostly
> just Lev doing all the talking (and his wife, and just a couple other
> people).
> And Lev tells a good story

Let's hear the unabridged Biden edition with all the payolla history.

Snit wrote:
> On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:16:18 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> <hsi8hj5d59bilbsfk7eid3s5caumii5i39@4ax.com>:
>
>> On 17 Oct 2024 21:36:52 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> When there were two old senile candidates the media focused on that. Now that
>>> there is only one it is like they have forgotten it.
>>
>> Your point illustrates the lie that the MSM is biased towards the left. If
>> they
>> were, they'd be making lots of hay over Trump's mutterings, mumblings and
>> missteps.
>
> Exactly. They are biased to get ratings. This means often speaking to the
> people -- who overall are generally liberal -- to doing ANYTHING to get
> ratings. Or for Fox and the like being insane propaganda (far, far more than
> other news stations).
>

the next generation will decide this election and its looking
poor for kamala.

On Oct 20, 2024 at 5:59:37 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
<0827da7d-62f7-e1e2-b632-0b2da28f9f5e@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:

> Snit wrote:
>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:16:18 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>> <hsi8hj5d59bilbsfk7eid3s5caumii5i39@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> On 17 Oct 2024 21:36:52 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> When there were two old senile candidates the media focused on that. Now that
>>>> there is only one it is like they have forgotten it.
>>>
>>> Your point illustrates the lie that the MSM is biased towards the left. If
>>> they
>>> were, they'd be making lots of hay over Trump's mutterings, mumblings and
>>> missteps.
>>
>> Exactly. They are biased to get ratings. This means often speaking to the
>> people -- who overall are generally liberal -- to doing ANYTHING to get
>> ratings. Or for Fox and the like being insane propaganda (far, far more than
>> other news stations).
>>
>
> the next generation will decide this election and its looking
> poor for kamala.

The news is certainly not good.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

In article <67150d04$0$212417$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>
> On Oct 20, 2024 at 5:59:37 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
> <0827da7d-62f7-e1e2-b632-0b2da28f9f5e@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>
> > Snit wrote:
> >> On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:16:18 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> >> <hsi8hj5d59bilbsfk7eid3s5caumii5i39@4ax.com>:
> >>
> >>> On 17 Oct 2024 21:36:52 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> When there were two old senile candidates the media focused on that. Now that
> >>>> there is only one it is like they have forgotten it.
> >>>
> >>> Your point illustrates the lie that the MSM is biased towards the left. If
> >>> they
> >>> were, they'd be making lots of hay over Trump's mutterings, mumblings and
> >>> missteps.
> >>
> >> Exactly. They are biased to get ratings. This means often speaking to the
> >> people -- who overall are generally liberal -- to doing ANYTHING to get
> >> ratings. Or for Fox and the like being insane propaganda (far, far more than
> >> other news stations).
> >>
> >
> > the next generation will decide this election and its looking
> > poor for kamala.
>
> The news is certainly not good.

Looks real good. I watched her rally yesterday. Epic failure.

On 2024-10-20, kazu <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
> Snit wrote:
>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:16:18 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>> <hsi8hj5d59bilbsfk7eid3s5caumii5i39@4ax.com>:
>>
>>> On 17 Oct 2024 21:36:52 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> When there were two old senile candidates the media focused on that. Now that
>>>> there is only one it is like they have forgotten it.
>>>
>>> Your point illustrates the lie that the MSM is biased towards the left. If
>>> they
>>> were, they'd be making lots of hay over Trump's mutterings, mumblings and
>>> missteps.
>>
>> Exactly. They are biased to get ratings. This means often speaking to the
>> people -- who overall are generally liberal -- to doing ANYTHING to get
>> ratings. Or for Fox and the like being insane propaganda (far, far more than
>> other news stations).
>>
>
> the next generation will decide this election and its looking
> poor for kamala.
>

It's time for the younger generations to begin to have a say in the government and the running of the country.
And it's time for the career politicians like McConnell, Schumer and so forth to retire.

--
pothead

See Kamala Harris best interview ever.
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6363352689112
She really knocks this one out of the park.
Don't you agree?

On 10/20/2024 7:32 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <67150d04$0$212417$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>
>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 5:59:37 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>> <0827da7d-62f7-e1e2-b632-0b2da28f9f5e@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>
>>> Snit wrote:
>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:16:18 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>> <hsi8hj5d59bilbsfk7eid3s5caumii5i39@4ax.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> On 17 Oct 2024 21:36:52 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> When there were two old senile candidates the media focused on that. Now that
>>>>>> there is only one it is like they have forgotten it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your point illustrates the lie that the MSM is biased towards the left. If
>>>>> they
>>>>> were, they'd be making lots of hay over Trump's mutterings, mumblings and
>>>>> missteps.
>>>>
>>>> Exactly. They are biased to get ratings. This means often speaking to the
>>>> people -- who overall are generally liberal -- to doing ANYTHING to get
>>>> ratings. Or for Fox and the like being insane propaganda (far, far more than
>>>> other news stations).
>>>>
>>>
>>> the next generation will decide this election and its looking
>>> poor for kamala.
>>
>> The news is certainly not good.
>
> Looks real good. I watched her rally yesterday. Epic failure.

The media is making it very obvious that they are supporting this
clueless quixotic fool for president.

In that sense, the media is the enemy of the republic and the owners
should be executed.

In article <vf6bvc$6r5$1@toxic.dizum.net>, kamala.harris@fake.news
says...
>
> On 10/20/2024 7:32 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <67150d04$0$212417$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
> >>
> >> On Oct 20, 2024 at 5:59:37 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
> >> <0827da7d-62f7-e1e2-b632-0b2da28f9f5e@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
> >>
> >>> Snit wrote:
> >>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:16:18 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
> >>>> <hsi8hj5d59bilbsfk7eid3s5caumii5i39@4ax.com>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 17 Oct 2024 21:36:52 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> When there were two old senile candidates the media focused on that. Now that
> >>>>>> there is only one it is like they have forgotten it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Your point illustrates the lie that the MSM is biased towards the left. If
> >>>>> they
> >>>>> were, they'd be making lots of hay over Trump's mutterings, mumblings and
> >>>>> missteps.
> >>>>
> >>>> Exactly. They are biased to get ratings. This means often speaking to the
> >>>> people -- who overall are generally liberal -- to doing ANYTHING to get
> >>>> ratings. Or for Fox and the like being insane propaganda (far, far more than
> >>>> other news stations).
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> the next generation will decide this election and its looking
> >>> poor for kamala.
> >>
> >> The news is certainly not good.
> >
> > Looks real good. I watched her rally yesterday. Epic failure.
>
> The media is making it very obvious that they are supporting this
> clueless quixotic fool for president.

It's so obvious Trump should win. What bothers me is that are are acting
just like they did when Joe was running.
>
> In that sense, the media is the enemy of the republic and the owners
> should be executed.

At least put out of business.

On 2024-10-21, Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <vf6bvc$6r5$1@toxic.dizum.net>, kamala.harris@fake.news
> says...
>>
>> On 10/20/2024 7:32 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> > In article <67150d04$0$212417$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> > brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>> >>
>> >> On Oct 20, 2024 at 5:59:37 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>> >> <0827da7d-62f7-e1e2-b632-0b2da28f9f5e@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>> >>
>> >>> Snit wrote:
>> >>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:16:18 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>> >>>> <hsi8hj5d59bilbsfk7eid3s5caumii5i39@4ax.com>:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On 17 Oct 2024 21:36:52 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> When there were two old senile candidates the media focused on that. Now that
>> >>>>>> there is only one it is like they have forgotten it.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Your point illustrates the lie that the MSM is biased towards the left. If
>> >>>>> they
>> >>>>> were, they'd be making lots of hay over Trump's mutterings, mumblings and
>> >>>>> missteps.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Exactly. They are biased to get ratings. This means often speaking to the
>> >>>> people -- who overall are generally liberal -- to doing ANYTHING to get
>> >>>> ratings. Or for Fox and the like being insane propaganda (far, far more than
>> >>>> other news stations).
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> the next generation will decide this election and its looking
>> >>> poor for kamala.
>> >>
>> >> The news is certainly not good.
>> >
>> > Looks real good. I watched her rally yesterday. Epic failure.
>>
>> The media is making it very obvious that they are supporting this
>> clueless quixotic fool for president.
>
> It's so obvious Trump should win. What bothers me is that are are acting
> just like they did when Joe was running.
>>
>> In that sense, the media is the enemy of the republic and the owners
>> should be executed.
>
> At least put out of business.

That is happening as we speak.
The legacy media is losing viewers and thus advertising dollars in a huge fashion.
Recent polling indicates that the people simply no longer trust the legacy media
anymore.
Ratings are in the toilet.

Even low information voters, like snit for example, are waking up and realizing
that the media lied to them for 4 years regarding Biden's cognitive decline and
worse yet that they effectively removed him and installed Kamala Harris without
a primary.

Here is a good article describing all of this.

'Dem Voters Show Signs of Anointer's Remorse'

<https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2024/10/21/dem-voters-show-signs-of-anointers-remorse-n3796080>

'Issues & Insights' Terry Jones calls this "buyer's remorse," but that doesn't fit. Literally no one bought Kamala Harris as the Democrat presidential nominee -- by design. Democrats never gave their voters a choice other than Joe Biden in the primaries, and then threw out 50 state contests to anoint Harris as the nominee once the cover-up of Biden's cognitive decline got exposed.

Small wonder, then, that over a third of Democrats in the new I&I/TIPP poll don't feel much "joy" over Harris as their candidate. And even more of them believe they got stuck with a weaker candidate than Democrats could have fielded:

Jones starts with the full poll result and then goes into the partisan demos:

For the first question, 58% said they either “agree strongly” (41%) or “agree somewhat” (17%). (Numbers on all calculations might not add up exactly due to rounding). At the same time, just 32% said they disagreed.

Independents largely viewed the Dems’ moves as the Republicans did. Among indie and third-party voters, 55% agreed with the statement in No. 1 above, while about a third disagreed.

Even Democrats weren’t exactly thrilled with the move. Some 40% agreed either “somewhat” or “strongly” that Harris was not the strongest candidate the party could have had, while 52% disagreed.

There are a few points to note here. First off, TIPP conducted this survey over two weeks ago, at a point just before the trendlines began to shift away from Harris. It's possible that Democrats feel better about Harris at the moment, but given the way the polls have shifted in Trump's direction, that seems ... unlikely. On October 4, the last date of the survey, Harris had a 2.2-point lead over Donald Trump in RCP's national-poll aggregation, a 0.6-point lead in their aggregated betting markets, and leads in a few of the key battleground states. As of today, her national-poll lead is down to one point in RCP aggregation, Trump leads all battleground states, and the betting markets have Trump up by nearly 20 points.

That doesn't suggest a grassroots rally effect happening lately. Just the opposite, in fact, and it's hardly surprising, since Harris literally won't make a case for herself as president. Instead, Harris continues to double down on her attempts to disqualify Trump rather than address her own policy positions and how they have all reversed in the past five years.

That cannot have gone unnoticed by Democrat voters, not even those who may still yet plan to hold their noses and vote for Harris anyway as the only alternative to Orange Man Bad. But having nearly 40% of your base feel as though they just got conned by their own party does not make for a great deal of enthusiasm, and the real risk for Harris is that they just won't show up at all.

Don't take my word for it, though. Hillary Clinton pollster Mark Penn cites Harris' lack of a positive argument for her leadership and her ties to the Biden administration to explain why she's losing the edge to Trump late in the election cycle. In the absence of a clearly articulated alternative to the status quo, voters simply trust Trump more to deliver a real change of direction on the issues that matter:

The reason Mr. Trump has a slight edge is straightforward: He dominates on the core issues that people say they care about most. He holds a 12-point lead over Kamala Harris on which candidate would do a better job on immigration, and a 4-point lead on both inflation and crime, according to the October 2024 Harvard CAPS/Harris poll. Such core domestic issues are usually what determines who gets elected, and Mr. Trump leads in all three of this election cycle’s top concerns.

The second reason for Mr. Trump’s advantage is that voters have more confidence in him on the issues of war and peace. Seventy percent of voters believe he has sufficient experience in foreign affairs, and he leads significantly in polling about which candidate would do a better job on the war in Ukraine, relations with China, and the war between Israel and Hamas.

Mr. Trump also has an edge over Ms. Harris because he has reduced the Democrats’ lead among black and Latino voters, especially among men. He has adopted a successful strategy of finding niche issues in key swing states—no tax on tips in Nevada, fracking in Pennsylvania and saving auto-manufacturing jobs in Michigan. Latino voters have particularly high levels of concern about the economy, and Mr. Trump has closed the electoral gap from a 25 point Democratic advantage in 2020 to just 12 points averaged from the past two months.

Penn argues that Harris still could win it through personal favorability, which she has improved in his Harvard-Harris polling from 38% to 49%. However, that looks like a mirage too when one looks at the RCP tracking of her favorability, a media-created mirage out of sheer necessity. Until Democrats anointed her as the nominee, she spent 37 straight months underwater, and 35 months with her unfavorable rating above 50%. For most of that time, Harris barely got her favorable ratings above 40%, and nowhere near 50% -- until the media suddenly painted her in soft terms, focused on her "joy," and never bothered to ask her a tough question. Even with the Protection Racket Media turboboost, Harris is still slightly in negative territory, 47.8/48.4.

However, Trump's favorability has also significantly improved this year, too. He began the year sixteen points underwater, 40.3/56.0, but gradually improved to a -7.2, 45.1/52.3. That's not a great number, but it is considerably better than Trump's favorability in 2020 and especially in 2016. Furthermore, while the data doesn't specifically break out aggregations by region or state, it's easy to suspect that Trump fares better in purple states, while Harris' gains probably mainly came from blue states falling in line with Democrat necessity. Just take a look at the polls in the battleground states for indirect evidence of that trend; they're not getting redder because Harris is becoming more popular, after all.

Could this change? Sure, but it would take one hell of a campaign to turn this around with less than two weeks to go. We haven't seen any evidence that Team Kamala has that kind of talent -- not at the top and not anywhere else, either. Anointer's remorse may become a very real story in a couple of weeks'

Fake News Profits <kamala.harris@fake.news> wrote:
> On 10/20/2024 7:32 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <67150d04$0$212417$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 5:59:37 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>>> <0827da7d-62f7-e1e2-b632-0b2da28f9f5e@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>>
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:16:18 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>>> <hsi8hj5d59bilbsfk7eid3s5caumii5i39@4ax.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2024 21:36:52 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When there were two old senile candidates the media focused on that. Now that
>>>>>>> there is only one it is like they have forgotten it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your point illustrates the lie that the MSM is biased towards the left. If
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> were, they'd be making lots of hay over Trump's mutterings, mumblings and
>>>>>> missteps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly. They are biased to get ratings. This means often speaking to the
>>>>> people -- who overall are generally liberal -- to doing ANYTHING to get
>>>>> ratings. Or for Fox and the like being insane propaganda (far, far more than
>>>>> other news stations).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> the next generation will decide this election and its looking
>>>> poor for kamala.
>>>
>>> The news is certainly not good.
>>
>> Looks real good. I watched her rally yesterday. Epic failure.
>
> The media is making it very obvious that they are supporting this
> clueless quixotic fool for president.
>
> In that sense, the media is the enemy of the republic and the owners
> should be executed.
>

Yes, I think the media mostly does speak for Trump, not Kamala.

They are extremely loyal to Trump and
protective of him. They were, and are, definitely not someone to cross.
Maybe it is a hope to keep their ratings up, maybe it us something else.

Fake News Profits <kamala.harris@fake.news> wrote:
> On 10/20/2024 7:32 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>> In article <67150d04$0$212417$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>
>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 5:59:37 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>>> <0827da7d-62f7-e1e2-b632-0b2da28f9f5e@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>>
>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:16:18 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>>> <hsi8hj5d59bilbsfk7eid3s5caumii5i39@4ax.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2024 21:36:52 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When there were two old senile candidates the media focused on that. Now that
>>>>>>> there is only one it is like they have forgotten it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your point illustrates the lie that the MSM is biased towards the left. If
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> were, they'd be making lots of hay over Trump's mutterings, mumblings and
>>>>>> missteps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Exactly. They are biased to get ratings. This means often speaking to the
>>>>> people -- who overall are generally liberal -- to doing ANYTHING to get
>>>>> ratings. Or for Fox and the like being insane propaganda (far, far more than
>>>>> other news stations).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> the next generation will decide this election and its looking
>>>> poor for kamala.
>>>
>>> The news is certainly not good.
>>
>> Looks real good. I watched her rally yesterday. Epic failure.
>
> The media is making it very obvious that they are supporting this
> clueless quixotic fool for president.
>
> In that sense, the media is the enemy of the republic and the owners
> should be executed.
>

Yes, I think the media mostly does speak for Trump, not Kamala.

They are extremely loyal to Trump and
protective of him. They were, and are, definitely not someone to cross.
Maybe it is a hope to keep their ratings up, maybe it us something else.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
> In article <vf6bvc$6r5$1@toxic.dizum.net>, kamala.harris@fake.news
> says...
>>
>> On 10/20/2024 7:32 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <67150d04$0$212417$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
>>> brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On Oct 20, 2024 at 5:59:37 AM MST, "kazu" wrote
>>>> <0827da7d-62f7-e1e2-b632-0b2da28f9f5e@ichigo.kinoko.kuri>:
>>>>
>>>>> Snit wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 19, 2024 at 5:16:18 PM MST, "Governor Swill" wrote
>>>>>> <hsi8hj5d59bilbsfk7eid3s5caumii5i39@4ax.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 17 Oct 2024 21:36:52 GMT, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When there were two old senile candidates the media focused on that. Now that
>>>>>>>> there is only one it is like they have forgotten it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your point illustrates the lie that the MSM is biased towards the left. If
>>>>>>> they
>>>>>>> were, they'd be making lots of hay over Trump's mutterings, mumblings and
>>>>>>> missteps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Exactly. They are biased to get ratings. This means often speaking to the
>>>>>> people -- who overall are generally liberal -- to doing ANYTHING to get
>>>>>> ratings. Or for Fox and the like being insane propaganda (far, far more than
>>>>>> other news stations).
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> the next generation will decide this election and its looking
>>>>> poor for kamala.
>>>>
>>>> The news is certainly not good.
>>>
>>> Looks real good. I watched her rally yesterday. Epic failure.
>>
>> The media is making it very obvious that they are supporting this
>> clueless quixotic fool for president.
>
> It's so obvious Trump should win. What bothers me is that are are acting
> just like they did when Joe was running.

What bothers me is that you love Trump, warts and all

>>
>> In that sense, the media is the enemy of the republic and the owners
>> should be executed.

There are, I am sure, ways to play them so they do exactly what you want.

WAPO just announced their new policy of “no presidential endorsements”.

>
> At least put out of business.
>
>
>

Tougher guys have tried but
seem to have given up a long time ago,

Most of media are still there but are nothing but ready to retire

The podcasts and influencers have taken over

You will get your wish soon enough