'Kamala Harris is an idiot.'

'She’s wildly, catastrophically, incontestably out of her depth.'

<https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4271758/posts>

'Kamala Harris is an idiot.
Since she replaced Joe Biden on the ticket, reporters have struggled
mightily to find kind ways of describing Harris’s ineluctable inability
to convey anything comprehensible, complex, or concrete. Harris, the New
York Times has variously proposed, has been “strategically vague,”
“light on detail,” and “careful.” Alternatively, she has “put her own
stamp on the art of the dodge”; learned to respond “to unpleasant
questions without answering them”; and shown an ability to “avoid
delineating her stance on some issues.” And yet, if one were to search
for a single world to sum up her candidacy, that word, apparently, would
be “joy.”

I disagree. I think that word would be “idiot.” Harris isn’t “vague” or
“careful” or disinclined to “delineate her stance.” She’s wildly,
catastrophically, incontestably out of her depth. She’s not “light”;
she’s dull. She’s not a “dodger”; she’s a fool. She’s not “joyful”;
she’s imbecilic. As Gertrude Stein once said of Harris’s hometown,
Oakland, there’s no “there there.” She’s a nullity, a vacuum, an
actress, an empty canvas that is incapable of absorbing paint. Search
through Harris’s historical press clippings and you will be astonished
by the vastness of space, for, in more than two decades of analysis and
reporting, Harris has not once been credited with a single valuable or
original idea. What you see on TV is what you get in private: a broken
battery-operated toy that can’t talk, that can’t argue, that can’t laugh
in the right places, and that badly malfunctions if expected to
transcend the superficial.'

i dont care about camel and hump and fightin.. livin on that beat.

John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:6uk4hj98m1gab537747drc24bt8bflcpg6@4ax.com:

> What you see on TV is what you get
> in private: a broken battery-operated toy that can’t talk, that
> can’t argue, that can’t laugh in the right places, and that badly
> malfunctions if expected to transcend the superficial.'

Indeed, a perfect description of Trump's
"town hall" where he takes five questions
and then spends 40 minutes just silently
swaying to music. Even his supporters were
embarrassed by the spectacle.

did you know that haki comes in 3 flavors?

also, no one cares about camel and hump.

In article <XnsB20F5067BE07E629555@185.151.15.160>, noemail@aol.com
says...
>
> John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:6uk4hj98m1gab537747drc24bt8bflcpg6@4ax.com:
>
> > What you see on TV is what you get
> > in private: a broken battery-operated toy that can�t talk, that
> > can�t argue, that can�t laugh in the right places, and that badly
> > malfunctions if expected to transcend the superficial.'
>
>
>
>
> Indeed, a perfect description of Trump's
> "town hall" where he takes five questions
> and then spends 40 minutes just silently
> swaying to music. Even his supporters were
> embarrassed by the spectacle.
>
>
TRUMP

Let's ignore the train wreck Kamalla was on Fox. She blamed the last ten
years on Trump. He must be doing something right.

John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 'Kamala Harris is an idiot.'
>
> 'She’s wildly, catastrophically, incontestably out of her depth.'
>
> <https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4271758/posts>
>
> 'Kamala Harris is an idiot.
> Since she replaced Joe Biden on the ticket, reporters have struggled
> mightily to find kind ways of describing Harris’s ineluctable inability
> to convey anything comprehensible, complex, or concrete. Harris, the New
> York Times has variously proposed, has been “strategically vague,”
> “light on detail,” and “careful.” Alternatively, she has “put her own
> stamp on the art of the dodge”; learned to respond “to unpleasant
> questions without answering them”; and shown an ability to “avoid
> delineating her stance on some issues.” And yet, if one were to search
> for a single world to sum up her candidacy, that word, apparently, would
> be “joy.”
>
> I disagree. I think that word would be “idiot.” Harris isn’t “vague” or
> “careful” or disinclined to “delineate her stance.” She’s wildly,
> catastrophically, incontestably out of her depth. She’s not “light”;
> she’s dull. She’s not a “dodger”; she’s a fool. She’s not “joyful”;
> she’s imbecilic. As Gertrude Stein once said of Harris’s hometown,
> Oakland, there’s no “there there.” She’s a nullity, a vacuum, an
> actress, an empty canvas that is incapable of absorbing paint. Search
> through Harris’s historical press clippings and you will be astonished
> by the vastness of space, for, in more than two decades of analysis and
> reporting, Harris has not once been credited with a single valuable or
> original idea. What you see on TV is what you get in private: a broken
> battery-operated toy that can’t talk, that can’t argue, that can’t laugh
> in the right places, and that badly malfunctions if expected to
> transcend the superficial.'
>

You pretty much described Trump.

The only thing you did not accuse her of = being a criminal.

Trump definitely wins on that score

He got away with it because barr suppressed and the gop invoked “look at
the birdie” tactics

I read that lev parnas again implicated john solomon
Solomon belongs in jail

Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
> John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:6uk4hj98m1gab537747drc24bt8bflcpg6@4ax.com:
>
>> What you see on TV is what you get
>> in private: a broken battery-operated toy that can’t talk, that
>> can’t argue, that can’t laugh in the right places, and that badly
>> malfunctions if expected to transcend the superficial.'
>
>
>
>
> Indeed, a perfect description of Trump's
> "town hall" where he takes five questions
> and then spends 40 minutes just silently
> swaying to music. Even his supporters were
> embarrassed by the spectacle.
>
>

His inability to understand the economy, tariffs and the stock market is
very embarrassing.

A couple weeks ago he started whining about Trump media stocks trading
being suspended NASDAQ..

He did not understand why this happened.

He does not understand the rules of NASDAQ trading.

His people told him to say this

BUt is market manipulation intended to keep people from selling

Nasdaq can halt if there is evidence of manipulation

When the statement was made and later on, it caused volatily of a kind that
also allows nasdaq to halt trading

He has no idea how this stuff works and his evil advisors convinced him to
do it to enrich themselves

Remember Trump media, it was a fraud from the start, with that one guy
pleading guilty a couple months back for insider trading

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>