chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> D. Ray wrote:
>
>> Skeeter wrote:
>>>
>>> D. Ray wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Is that the only thing you worry about? Well, what if kid?s parents are
>>>> okay with that? They?ve been told that ?you gonna have a trans kid or dead
>>>> kid,
>>>
>>> Dumbest damn argument so far.
>>
>> That’s what those people are told. It’s almost literally a quote from
>> article I posted earlier in this very thread:
>>
>> <https://www.worldtribune.com/woman-sues-university-for-double-mastectomy-she-got-at-16/>
>
>>> “Would you rather have a dead daughter or a living son?”
>>
>>> That is what a physician told the parents of a Nebraska 16-year-old girl
>>> who would then go on to get a double mastectomy, according to a lawsuit
>>> filed by the 21-year-old woman.
>
> We know, or should know, about the diabolical tactics of the "trans
> activists."
>
>> So now what? Is that okay? Is that fine?
>
> I don't think that anyone was saying it becomes "okay" at adulthood,
> but that it "should be allowed" at adulthood (and not before).

I assume you mean Republicans. And take you described means that they gave
up on transgenderism. They accepted “trans” as reality. They accepted that
people can cut off their dicks or boobs because “they were born in a wrong
body”. The only thing they disagree on with rabid libshits is age, but they
will fold on that, too, just like they did on gay marriage, “queer youth”,
Christianity, etc. Obama in 2008 was stating that marriage is between man
and a woman. GOP now is full of faggots, officially, and they already had
“Lady MAGA”. “Our tranny is hotter than your tranny!” Obama was more
conservative than these fucks.

Conservatives exist for you to loose. There is no issue they didn’t fold
on. If you accept that “love is love” and “they were born that way”, you
inevitably will end up with grown ass men kissing little boys at “Pride
parades”, like you have now. And if you accept tranies, “Caitlyn” Jenner,
and “Lady MAGA”, you inevitably will end up with trans children, because if
they were “born in wrong body”, it happened at birth, and not allowing them
to get a surgery is to make them suffer. And if you knowingly make your
children suffer, then it’s child abuse, isn’t it?

Scout <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>
> "D. Ray" <d@ray> wrote in message
> news:lsBdytYGQEuZcRbtZisUkSzOvcBwjpei@news.usenet.farm...
>> Scout <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> "D. Ray" <d@ray> wrote in message
>>> news:rjPWJnoisfTNvuXAneMEWhoKtYOKLCDp@news.usenet.farm...
>>>> Scout <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "D. Ray" <d@ray> wrote in message
>>>>> news:EbISvgJaigwuKDyvPcegnYFwDabrsnVx@news.usenet.farm...
>>>>>> Scout <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Leroy N. Soetoro" <democrat-insurrection@mail.house.gov> wrote in
>>>>>>> message
>>>>>>> news:lnsB1F1B9F5630EB6F089P2473@0.0.0.1...
>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/06/18/detransitioned-teens-explain-why-they-
>>>>>>>> regret-changing-genders/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "I was failed by the system. I literally lost organs."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You got exactly what you demanded....
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If a person was lied to by bad actors and got unneeded botched
>>>>>> surgery,
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> only then realized her mistake, don’t you think bad actors still have
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> punished?
>>>>>
>>>>> He is an adult responsible for his own actions..
>>>>
>>>> Most of those people are teenagers, but even if they’re not, they’re all
>>>> mentally not right and propagandised.
>>>>
>>>>> if he wasn't then the
>>>>> surgery should have been refused.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which is why I say the age to undergo this should be 21.
>>>>
>>>> Why 21? Mentally unstable people at that age don’t need help anymore and
>>>> should be allowed to ruin their life and body? Just because it makes
>>>> some
>>>> Jewish surgeons and pharma companies richer?
>>>
>>> Because at 21 they are legally recognized as adults in every state and to
>>> the federal government and no longer have any legal call upon their
>>> parents
>>> for permission, aid, support or money.
>>
>> Is that the only thing you worry about?
>
> Nope, but it is certainly the main one.

No doubt about it. That’s why you loose.

>> Well, what if kid’s parents are
>> okay with that?
>
> Because they aren't allowed by law to abuse or mutilate their child or have
> such done to their child.
>
> See, it would be one thing if it was medically necessary, but it's not.

Well, they’re saying it is.

> It would be like saying I want the doctors to cut off his left arm because I
> want my child to be right handed.
>
>> They’ve been told that “you gonna have a trans kid or dead
>> kid, your choice”
>
> Sounds to me like the child needs some serious mental health help and
> perhaps even being locked up to prevent themselves from injuring themselves.

And why stop doing it at 21? Will child’s disease disappear?

> A nice padded room and a straight jacked will do to start along with regular
> visits from the doctors.
>
>> , so they give permission and their insurance is going to
>> pay for “life-saving” “treatment”?
>
> Yea, looking them up in a mental institution.
>
> I mean that's what we do with the dangerously insane.

No, you’re not. You’re allowing them to get deeper and deeper in their
delusions, totally exposed to propaganda until they get 21 y.o. when they
finally can chop their dick off. So you’re getting the same result, except
that the kid also hates you for making them wait.

>> Then what?
>
> Well, they either get better or become an adult.
>
>> Is everything fine?
>
> Yep.

Got it.

>> Are you
>> okay with that?
>
> With incarceration in an insane asylum for mental illness and the potential
> to self harm?
>
> Absolutely.
>
>
>>> It becomes their decision alone and as such they bear the entire
>>> responsibility for the costs and consequences of their decision..
>>
>> No, if mentally unstable person has been propagandized starting from
>> childhood and then she cuts of her breasts at 21, it does not magically
>> makes it okay.
>
> No, but as an adult they can mutilate themselves as they see fit, IMO.
>
> As a child.. well, sometimes we have to protect children from their own
> stupidity.

Are you advocating releasing everyone who is 21 or older from mental health
institutions?

>> The fact that you don’t have any compassion for the victims of this
>> industry
>
> I have compassion for the victims of such unnecessary life altering cosmetic
> surgery, which is why I require they be an adult first.

What exactly will change? Their life and their body won’t get ruined?

>> explains why conservatards are constantly loosing. It’s because
>> your leaders are the same. They don’t fucking care about you.
>
> If I didn't care, then why would I care if they parents cut off their
> child's dick, legs and the fingers on their right hand?
>
> I mean, as long as they claim it's necessary to the child.. that should be
> good enough right?

As you already said, “good enough” for you is when your money not involved.

>> They will
>> drop tens of thousands of Haitians in your neighborhood, just like
>> Republicans in Ohio did, because they will get a cut of the federal money
>> that comes with those negroes.
>
> Lame attempt to change the subject.

Just stating the facts.

> Further how could any state government do that unless the Democrat
> controlled federal government didn't first allow them to enter the country
> illegally?

Legally. And Republicans already said they want those “hard working”
Haitians. But you can keep come up with excuses.