No kidding.

'Kamala Harris is good for nothing'

<https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/10/kamala_harris_is_good_for_nothing.html>

'Kamala is a good-for-nothing on at least three levels.

First: she is literally “good for nothing.”

Her career is littered with failures. Even a distinguished black
journalist dared to observe, at great professional peril, her “failing
up” the career ladder. Craig J. DeLuz, writing for the Washington
Times, bravely concedes that, “An elected official with a track record
of failure spanning her entire political career, Harris has consistently
been rewarded with promotions by left-leaning voters.”

Among her many inadequacies, Mr. DeLuz notes that Kamala was the most
left-leaning member of the Senate, all the while achieving the following
– nothing.

Second: she is “good” for voters who may be lacking a bit of “pull
yourself up by the bootstraps” gumption. Lazy constituents who are
willing to sacrifice personal dignity by slurping at the government
trough interminably. In return, she expects nothing from them. Money
for nothing, especially for illegal aliens. Her giveaways will increase
our national debt; they’ll increase demand while her regulations dampen
supply. Guess what that does to prices? Further proof that she’s a
good-for-nothing pretender.

Third, she is a blank slate; a tabula rasa upon which the leftist
intelligentsia will scribble hogwash. As Bernie Sanders noted, she has
not the courage of her convictions, but will say and do anything to
become the first female president.

She offers very vague notions of an “opportunity economy” (more
giveaways, really), but her promises are good for nothing. Without
specifics, they’re just enough to entice the lefty layabouts, but with
enough holes to allow Obama, Bernie, Nancy, and Pochanantas to fill the
voids.

A popular idiom is that nature abhors a vacuum. But Putin and Xi are
opportunists who love it as they seek a new world order. They will
swamp Kamala’s nothingness with hard-core hegemonic Realpolitik. As
desperate and dire as the political rally hyperbole may seem, Trump may
actually be right in claiming he’ll prevent WWIII. Under Kamala’s
indiscreet indecisions, and appalling appeasement of antagonistic
adversaries, the world itself could become nothing.

It’s astonishing that an empty skirt with an empty skull is a serious
presidential challenger. She’s unserious. She’ll say anything, but
mean nothing. She’s a leftist good-for-nothing, having nothing to offer
but fear itself. I’ve met smarter people with more gravitas in the
local Polar Plunge Club (one must be on the lower end of the Bell Curve
to voluntarily suffer that cold when there are other ways to reduce
swelling, or whatever benefits they hope to derive).

Jean-Paul Sartre was an existentialist who wrote Being and Nothingness.
That’s not exactly the allusion I’m teasing here, but there’s a
parallel: Kamala is a subsumed by nothingness (minimal consciousness)
who poses an existential threat – to all of us. Trump, and his now
impressive array of confidants (compared to last time), will lead us
“through the valley of the shadow of death.” An exhilarating exodus
from good-for-nothing leftism into MAGA rapture.'