On 2024-09-29 2:12 p.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-09-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-09-29 11:45 a.m., Relf wrote:
>>> Huntzinger mentioned Russia's neighbors:
>>>> laying low to avoid being invaded by Russia again.
>>>
>>> Putin is that schoolyard bully who thinks he's "winning"
>>> because he steals the most lunch money.
>>>
>>> "Paleo conservatives" think he's like Christ,
>>> Sent by God to destroy America's atheism/Marxism.
>>
>> Jeff, you're ignoring that America basically ignored the will of the
>> people in 2014 and handed over the territory of people who wanted to be
>> a part of Russia to Ukraine. You're also ignoring that Ukraine's puppet
>> government is purposefully looking to disregard the deal America made
>> with Russia in the early 90s _to_ make Russia defenseless in the event
>> of a war. Not only do they want to remove all natural obstacles that
>> might slow any progress to Moscow, they want Ukraine's vast resources
>> and have already handed them over to American interests against the
>> Ukrainian people. The fact that they've taken over a third of
>> agricultural land there is already well known.
>>
>> Russia is not the bad guy here. America and the people who control it to
>> destroy Western Civilization in addition to making Americans themselves
>> poor are.
>
> Yep. The U.S. taxpayers are no longer giving billion$ to Ukraine, "we're"
> "loaning" them the money we know they will never be able to repay, with
> strings attached. Ukraine's natural resources become the Rothschild's (and
> fellow slime's) resources. (How the American people are on the hook to fund
> this "leveraged buyout" to benefit BlackRock, Vanguard and other
> Rothschild-controlled entities is another question that Relf should answer.)
> This is what they want for Russia — they basically had it in their grasping
> claws, until Putin kicked these bastards out and started using Russia's
> natural resources for Russians. The standard of living has gone way up under
> Putin. He's also rebuilding churches and cities. Amazing what can be done
> when a country's natural resources aren't being shoveled into the
> Rothschild's greedy maw.

And the American government would have you believe that giving away the
country's land and resources to a few oligarchs is the American way. If
they have their way, it will be impossible to own anything and you'll be
forced to lease anything you use. They will have total control which
means that if ever you stop playing by their rules, you'll be discarded
from society. You might not be killed, but you'll be on the outside
looking in, unable to survive for very long.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king

On 2024-09-29 2:02 p.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-09-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-09-29 4:01 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-27 7:28 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-09-27, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-09-27 12:40 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-09-26, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-09-26 2:47 a.m., Relf wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Putin is worse than Hitler, RonB. Zelenskyy is our hero.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger: Ukraine hasn't actually enacted a draft for their men ages 18-25.
>>>>>>>>> The constraint on them at present is that they can't leave the country:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Amazing, I didn't know that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In RonB's little world, Zelenskyy has "least two huge yachts";
>>>>>>>>> in reality, Putin is the one with the yachts, not Zelenskyy,
>>>>>>>>> & he can go anywhere he wants, so long as it's near Turkey.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Zelensky is your hero the same way that a brother who keeps asking you
>>>>>>>> for money and abusing your sons and daughters would be a hero.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Zelensky is a desperate little (rich) Jew constantly panhandling for more
>>>>>>> goodies. He grew up in a part of Ukraine that speaks Russian, and Russian
>>>>>>> was his native tongue, but he wantes keep all Russian-speaking Ukrainians
>>>>>>> from speaking their native tongue. As soon as the world gets tired of his
>>>>>>> endless mooching, he's history – unless he's smart enough to escape on one
>>>>>>> of his yachts before he's "histrophied." And it won't be the Russians who do
>>>>>>> him in, it will be Ukrainians (if he hasn't gotten them all killed by then
>>>>>>> with insane military (so-called) "tactics").
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is in Ukraine's best interest to end the war as soon as possible and
>>>>>> to go back to normal life. All it would take is for them to keep their
>>>>>> promise about not becoming a part of NATO - especially since it is clear
>>>>>> that the United States want the tactical advantage of removing any
>>>>>> natural obstacle in a theoretical war with Russia - and to respect the
>>>>>> wishes of the residents of Donetsk Oblast, Luhansk Oblast, Zaporizhzhia
>>>>>> Oblast and Kherson Oblast who overwhelmingly voted for annexation.
>>>>>> Russia simply wants the American nose to be kept out of its politics and
>>>>>> its region, especially since the Americans themselves promised not to
>>>>>> move an inch further into their territory in the early 90s. Anyways, I
>>>>>> have little sympathy for Zelensky in this affair. He is doing little
>>>>>> more than confirming what I already knew about Jews in power.
>>>>>
>>>>> Soros wrote an article in the 90s (or 80s?) about using eastern Europeans to
>>>>> do their "security" dirty work because "NATO countries wouldn't tolerate
>>>>> their people coming back in body bags." The U.S. (CIA) has been grooming the
>>>>> Neo-Nazi Ukrainians in west Ukraine to hate Russia since the end of WWII.
>>>>> The Rothschilds desperately want to get their claws on Russia's vast natural
>>>>> resources and Putin stands in their way.
>>>>>
>>>>> What these neo-CON morons don't realize is that Putin is the moderate voice
>>>>> in Russia, trying to keep WWIII from happening.
>>>>
>>>> I've had the opportunity to read a few of Putin's statements and watch a
>>>> number of his interviews (including the Tucker one) and I don't see the
>>>> villain everyone else is seeing. Maybe I'm too trusting, but every point
>>>> he raises and his response to it makes sense. The Ukrainian election in
>>>> 2014 was indeed stolen by the Americans, Russia indeed needs for Ukraine
>>>> to remain neutral for their own safety and it indeed makes sense for the
>>>> country to partner with China considering how the United States is not
>>>> playing fair. I imagine that an American will just repeat that they're
>>>> evil all day, but I don't see why anyone would benefit by submitting to
>>>> American demands. Did any of the South American countries whose
>>>> leadership was toppled benefit? Did Jamaica? Did Haiti improve after
>>>> Americans got involved?
>>>
>>> Right now the western-aligned leader of Armenia is destroying his own
>>> country. And look what happened to Argentina when the new moron, idiot
>>> leader took charge and moved away from BRICS. Poverty level now up to 48% of
>>> the country.
>>>
>>> Go Woke go broke. Go Woke USA style, go broke.
>>
>> Ah, I actually had no idea that Argentina didn't improve after Milei
>> took over. At the same time, I think that the economy and currency were
>> in such bad shape that there was no way he was going to fix that in the
>> short term. Either way, it doesn't look like greater proximity to the
>> United States will do anything beneficial, unless maybe he develops the
>> tourism industry there and sweetens the deal for Americans looking to
>> travel there.
>
> They were in bad shape, but Milei has made it much worse. Argentina had
> agreed to join BRICS and that's one of the first things Milei nixed. Instead
> he decided to go the Rothschild route and that always ends up badly. I guess
> to get on the good side of the world banking system, he almost immediately
> converted to Judaism after the election. As far as I can tell he's not very
> religious, considers himself some kind of "sex shaman," or some dumb ass
> thing like that. Hitching your wagon to the United States in this day and
> age is not very bright.

That really is too bad. I think that BRICS is the only hope for the
Third World if their desire is to escape that label.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king

On 2024-09-29 2:18 p.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-09-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-09-28 1:48 p.m., pothead wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-28, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> RonB wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Soros
>>>>
>>>> Speaking of that POS, have you heard about his buy-up hundreds of
>>>> radio stations, with leftists at the FCC skirting the rules to
>>>> expedite things?
>>>>
>>>> https://afn.net/media/2024/09/26/soros-name-and-money-behind-radio-purchase-deal-rule-skirting-fcc/
>>>>
>>> I think he is wasting his money unless these are something other than OTA
>>> stations (AM/FM).
>>>
>>> Here is another link:
>>> <https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/09/24/
>>> fcc_commissioner_brendan_carr_fcc_creating_a_new_shortcut_for_soros-
>>> backed_group_to_buy_hundreds_of_radio_stations_before_november.html>
>>
>> Radio could have been profitable if they had left it as is and allowed
>> it to be the place where conservatives could get away from the barrage
>> of progressive talk, AM radio in particular. However, as we all know,
>> progressives are so tolerant of a different opinion that they feel the
>> need to smash it into a million pieces. How dare we think that it's a
>> good idea to pay your bills and start a family!
>
> I'm pretty much fed up with "conservative" talk radio anyhow. All it is is
> talk... talk... talk. A way for people to blow off steam without actually
> doing anything. Besides most of the "conservative" talk radio hosts are
> closet neo-CONS pushing for more and more war. Basically neo-CONs control
> both parties.

Honestly, I'm pretty fed-up too. I was subscribed to a bunch of
conservative podcasts but I unsubscribed to them all, opting to focus on
the situation here in Quebec rather than the war between the left and
the right all over the world. It was honestly exhausting, and there was
absolutely nothing I could do to fix any of it anyway. At least with
Quebec matters, my voice and my vote actually matter.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king

On 2024-09-29 2:15 p.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-09-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-09-28 8:34 a.m., chrisv wrote:
>>> RonB wrote:
>>>
>>>> Soros
>>>
>>> Speaking of that POS, have you heard about his buy-up hundreds of
>>> radio stations, with leftists at the FCC skirting the rules to
>>> expedite things?
>>>
>>> https://afn.net/media/2024/09/26/soros-name-and-money-behind-radio-purchase-deal-rule-skirting-fcc/
>>
>> How can you make sure that people vote the way you want them to? By
>> making sure that the message they receive across television, radio and
>> any news programs within is the same. The progressives are shocked that
>> when it comes to podcasts, the most popular programs like Rogan and
>> Tucker lean right. Meanwhile, podcasting is the _one_ place where you
>> can get a conservative voice.
>
> Yeah, but this isn't going to be good enough for them, because more people
> are watching Rogan than CNN, and the other Woke Crap networks. The real
> answer for these "concerned about democracy" ghouls is more and more
> censorship, so they can shut down the competition, "1984" style.

Except that the shutdowns don't seem to be working as they intended.
People were supposed to believe the story that everyone other than them
is racist, a Nazi, a Russian asset or whatever, but nobody believes any
of it anymore. They do still manage to get people removed (Lauren Chen
recently, Alex Jones upcoming), but they do so by forcing the platforms
to shut them down rather than by convincing the public because the
latter sees through the tactics they've used over and over again.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king

RonB: How the American people are on the hook to fund
this "leveraged buyout" to benefit BlackRock, Vanguard and other
Rothschild-controlled entities is another question that Relf should answer.

The dominant military has the dominant currency.
We're rich for a reason, and it's not because we virtue signal all the time.

I like Jews, I like Buddhists, I like Japanese culture, I like North Koreans,
I like Vietnamese & Germans, Catholics & Mormons too; Yet I'm an atheist.

Slavic mothers are welcome anywhere in the world, including the White House.
Thank you Putin, keep sending us your best.

On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2024-09-29 2:12 p.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2024-09-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-29 11:45 a.m., Relf wrote:
>>>> Huntzinger mentioned Russia's neighbors:
>>>>> laying low to avoid being invaded by Russia again.
>>>>
>>>> Putin is that schoolyard bully who thinks he's "winning"
>>>> because he steals the most lunch money.
>>>>
>>>> "Paleo conservatives" think he's like Christ,
>>>> Sent by God to destroy America's atheism/Marxism.
>>>
>>> Jeff, you're ignoring that America basically ignored the will of the
>>> people in 2014 and handed over the territory of people who wanted to be
>>> a part of Russia to Ukraine. You're also ignoring that Ukraine's puppet
>>> government is purposefully looking to disregard the deal America made
>>> with Russia in the early 90s _to_ make Russia defenseless in the event
>>> of a war. Not only do they want to remove all natural obstacles that
>>> might slow any progress to Moscow, they want Ukraine's vast resources
>>> and have already handed them over to American interests against the
>>> Ukrainian people. The fact that they've taken over a third of
>>> agricultural land there is already well known.
>>>
>>> Russia is not the bad guy here. America and the people who control it to
>>> destroy Western Civilization in addition to making Americans themselves
>>> poor are.
>>
>> Yep. The U.S. taxpayers are no longer giving billion$ to Ukraine, "we're"
>> "loaning" them the money we know they will never be able to repay, with
>> strings attached. Ukraine's natural resources become the Rothschild's (and
>> fellow slime's) resources. (How the American people are on the hook to fund
>> this "leveraged buyout" to benefit BlackRock, Vanguard and other
>> Rothschild-controlled entities is another question that Relf should answer.)
>> This is what they want for Russia — they basically had it in their grasping
>> claws, until Putin kicked these bastards out and started using Russia's
>> natural resources for Russians. The standard of living has gone way up under
>> Putin. He's also rebuilding churches and cities. Amazing what can be done
>> when a country's natural resources aren't being shoveled into the
>> Rothschild's greedy maw.
>
> And the American government would have you believe that giving away the
> country's land and resources to a few oligarchs is the American way. If
> they have their way, it will be impossible to own anything and you'll be
> forced to lease anything you use. They will have total control which
> means that if ever you stop playing by their rules, you'll be discarded
> from society. You might not be killed, but you'll be on the outside
> looking in, unable to survive for very long.

Yep. And you're back to the situation found in the old communist countries,
the black market — which was (and will be) needed for survival.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2024-09-29 2:18 p.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2024-09-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-28 1:48 p.m., pothead wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-28, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> RonB wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Soros
>>>>>
>>>>> Speaking of that POS, have you heard about his buy-up hundreds of
>>>>> radio stations, with leftists at the FCC skirting the rules to
>>>>> expedite things?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://afn.net/media/2024/09/26/soros-name-and-money-behind-radio-purchase-deal-rule-skirting-fcc/
>>>>>
>>>> I think he is wasting his money unless these are something other than OTA
>>>> stations (AM/FM).
>>>>
>>>> Here is another link:
>>>> <https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/09/24/
>>>> fcc_commissioner_brendan_carr_fcc_creating_a_new_shortcut_for_soros-
>>>> backed_group_to_buy_hundreds_of_radio_stations_before_november.html>
>>>
>>> Radio could have been profitable if they had left it as is and allowed
>>> it to be the place where conservatives could get away from the barrage
>>> of progressive talk, AM radio in particular. However, as we all know,
>>> progressives are so tolerant of a different opinion that they feel the
>>> need to smash it into a million pieces. How dare we think that it's a
>>> good idea to pay your bills and start a family!
>>
>> I'm pretty much fed up with "conservative" talk radio anyhow. All it is is
>> talk... talk... talk. A way for people to blow off steam without actually
>> doing anything. Besides most of the "conservative" talk radio hosts are
>> closet neo-CONS pushing for more and more war. Basically neo-CONs control
>> both parties.
>
> Honestly, I'm pretty fed-up too. I was subscribed to a bunch of
> conservative podcasts but I unsubscribed to them all, opting to focus on
> the situation here in Quebec rather than the war between the left and
> the right all over the world. It was honestly exhausting, and there was
> absolutely nothing I could do to fix any of it anyway. At least with
> Quebec matters, my voice and my vote actually matter.

That's probably the best decision. I, fortunately, live in a pretty
conservative area so there's not as much for me to worry about locally.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2024-09-29 2:15 p.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2024-09-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-28 8:34 a.m., chrisv wrote:
>>>> RonB wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Soros
>>>>
>>>> Speaking of that POS, have you heard about his buy-up hundreds of
>>>> radio stations, with leftists at the FCC skirting the rules to
>>>> expedite things?
>>>>
>>>> https://afn.net/media/2024/09/26/soros-name-and-money-behind-radio-purchase-deal-rule-skirting-fcc/
>>>
>>> How can you make sure that people vote the way you want them to? By
>>> making sure that the message they receive across television, radio and
>>> any news programs within is the same. The progressives are shocked that
>>> when it comes to podcasts, the most popular programs like Rogan and
>>> Tucker lean right. Meanwhile, podcasting is the _one_ place where you
>>> can get a conservative voice.
>>
>> Yeah, but this isn't going to be good enough for them, because more people
>> are watching Rogan than CNN, and the other Woke Crap networks. The real
>> answer for these "concerned about democracy" ghouls is more and more
>> censorship, so they can shut down the competition, "1984" style.
>
> Except that the shutdowns don't seem to be working as they intended.
> People were supposed to believe the story that everyone other than them
> is racist, a Nazi, a Russian asset or whatever, but nobody believes any
> of it anymore. They do still manage to get people removed (Lauren Chen
> recently, Alex Jones upcoming), but they do so by forcing the platforms
> to shut them down rather than by convincing the public because the
> latter sees through the tactics they've used over and over again.

Yep. They want the power to control who can be on the Internet, because they
know they can't control the message otherwise. The worthless piece of crap,
John Kerry, kissing up to his masters at the WEF, has recently stated that
the First Amendment's right to free speech stands in the way of
"governing."

Our First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to
hammer [disinformation] out of existence. What we need is to win...the
right to govern by hopefully winning enough votes that you're free to be
able to implement change...

So that's answer. "1984" style censorship with its "thought police." This is
the goal of the Democrats, to completely control information and give us
only their side of the story. It's the Woke Cult. They already have this
control in the MSM, but "too much" truth "leaks out" on the Internet. They
want to shut that down and completely control the Internet as well.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 2024-09-29 9:58 p.m., Relf wrote:
> RonB: How the American people are on the hook to fund
> this "leveraged buyout" to benefit BlackRock, Vanguard and other
> Rothschild-controlled entities is another question that Relf should answer.
>
> The dominant military has the dominant currency.
> We're rich for a reason, and it's not because we virtue signal all the time.
>
> I like Jews, I like Buddhists, I like Japanese culture, I like North Koreans,
> I like Vietnamese & Germans, Catholics & Mormons too; Yet I'm an atheist.
>
> Slavic mothers are welcome anywhere in the world, including the White House.
> Thank you Putin, keep sending us your best.

You're rich because people accepted to use your currency as their
reserve. Once they lose interest in doing so and your currency is
further devalued (it already gets debased 15% every year), you won't be
so rich.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king

On 2024-09-30 2:52 a.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-09-29 2:12 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-29 11:45 a.m., Relf wrote:
>>>>> Huntzinger mentioned Russia's neighbors:
>>>>>> laying low to avoid being invaded by Russia again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Putin is that schoolyard bully who thinks he's "winning"
>>>>> because he steals the most lunch money.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Paleo conservatives" think he's like Christ,
>>>>> Sent by God to destroy America's atheism/Marxism.
>>>>
>>>> Jeff, you're ignoring that America basically ignored the will of the
>>>> people in 2014 and handed over the territory of people who wanted to be
>>>> a part of Russia to Ukraine. You're also ignoring that Ukraine's puppet
>>>> government is purposefully looking to disregard the deal America made
>>>> with Russia in the early 90s _to_ make Russia defenseless in the event
>>>> of a war. Not only do they want to remove all natural obstacles that
>>>> might slow any progress to Moscow, they want Ukraine's vast resources
>>>> and have already handed them over to American interests against the
>>>> Ukrainian people. The fact that they've taken over a third of
>>>> agricultural land there is already well known.
>>>>
>>>> Russia is not the bad guy here. America and the people who control it to
>>>> destroy Western Civilization in addition to making Americans themselves
>>>> poor are.
>>>
>>> Yep. The U.S. taxpayers are no longer giving billion$ to Ukraine, "we're"
>>> "loaning" them the money we know they will never be able to repay, with
>>> strings attached. Ukraine's natural resources become the Rothschild's (and
>>> fellow slime's) resources. (How the American people are on the hook to fund
>>> this "leveraged buyout" to benefit BlackRock, Vanguard and other
>>> Rothschild-controlled entities is another question that Relf should answer.)
>>> This is what they want for Russia — they basically had it in their grasping
>>> claws, until Putin kicked these bastards out and started using Russia's
>>> natural resources for Russians. The standard of living has gone way up under
>>> Putin. He's also rebuilding churches and cities. Amazing what can be done
>>> when a country's natural resources aren't being shoveled into the
>>> Rothschild's greedy maw.
>>
>> And the American government would have you believe that giving away the
>> country's land and resources to a few oligarchs is the American way. If
>> they have their way, it will be impossible to own anything and you'll be
>> forced to lease anything you use. They will have total control which
>> means that if ever you stop playing by their rules, you'll be discarded
>> from society. You might not be killed, but you'll be on the outside
>> looking in, unable to survive for very long.
>
> Yep. And you're back to the situation found in the old communist countries,
> the black market — which was (and will be) needed for survival.

And this is why a lot of people are starting to believe that the wrong
side won the Second World War. When London is no longer filled with the
English and Western governments are all committing to censoring their
citizens or punishing them for speaking out, it's hard to believe that
the good guys won.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king

On 2024-09-30 3:03 a.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-09-29 2:15 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-28 8:34 a.m., chrisv wrote:
>>>>> RonB wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Soros
>>>>>
>>>>> Speaking of that POS, have you heard about his buy-up hundreds of
>>>>> radio stations, with leftists at the FCC skirting the rules to
>>>>> expedite things?
>>>>>
>>>>> https://afn.net/media/2024/09/26/soros-name-and-money-behind-radio-purchase-deal-rule-skirting-fcc/
>>>>
>>>> How can you make sure that people vote the way you want them to? By
>>>> making sure that the message they receive across television, radio and
>>>> any news programs within is the same. The progressives are shocked that
>>>> when it comes to podcasts, the most popular programs like Rogan and
>>>> Tucker lean right. Meanwhile, podcasting is the _one_ place where you
>>>> can get a conservative voice.
>>>
>>> Yeah, but this isn't going to be good enough for them, because more people
>>> are watching Rogan than CNN, and the other Woke Crap networks. The real
>>> answer for these "concerned about democracy" ghouls is more and more
>>> censorship, so they can shut down the competition, "1984" style.
>>
>> Except that the shutdowns don't seem to be working as they intended.
>> People were supposed to believe the story that everyone other than them
>> is racist, a Nazi, a Russian asset or whatever, but nobody believes any
>> of it anymore. They do still manage to get people removed (Lauren Chen
>> recently, Alex Jones upcoming), but they do so by forcing the platforms
>> to shut them down rather than by convincing the public because the
>> latter sees through the tactics they've used over and over again.
>
> Yep. They want the power to control who can be on the Internet, because they
> know they can't control the message otherwise. The worthless piece of crap,
> John Kerry, kissing up to his masters at the WEF, has recently stated that
> the First Amendment's right to free speech stands in the way of
> "governing."
>
> Our First Amendment stands as a major block to the ability to be able to
> hammer [disinformation] out of existence. What we need is to win...the
> right to govern by hopefully winning enough votes that you're free to be
> able to implement change...
>
> So that's answer. "1984" style censorship with its "thought police." This is
> the goal of the Democrats, to completely control information and give us
> only their side of the story. It's the Woke Cult. They already have this
> control in the MSM, but "too much" truth "leaks out" on the Internet. They
> want to shut that down and completely control the Internet as well.

Since they have total control of the platforms where people can share
the truth, including Telegram now, it is very important to hold onto
ones where people can speak freely like Usenet or Gab. If we didn't have
such platforms, we'd all have to repeat MSNBC talking points all day
like Ahlstrom does if we wanted to hold onto our accounts or stay off
the radar of the police. What's happening in England, with people
getting a visit from the police or getting arrested for speaking out
about an injustice is what's coming to America if people actually allow
people like John Kerry to get what they want in crippling the First
Amendment. We're already fucked in Canada.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king

On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2024-09-30 2:52 a.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-29 2:12 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-09-29 11:45 a.m., Relf wrote:
>>>>>> Huntzinger mentioned Russia's neighbors:
>>>>>>> laying low to avoid being invaded by Russia again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Putin is that schoolyard bully who thinks he's "winning"
>>>>>> because he steals the most lunch money.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Paleo conservatives" think he's like Christ,
>>>>>> Sent by God to destroy America's atheism/Marxism.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeff, you're ignoring that America basically ignored the will of the
>>>>> people in 2014 and handed over the territory of people who wanted to be
>>>>> a part of Russia to Ukraine. You're also ignoring that Ukraine's puppet
>>>>> government is purposefully looking to disregard the deal America made
>>>>> with Russia in the early 90s _to_ make Russia defenseless in the event
>>>>> of a war. Not only do they want to remove all natural obstacles that
>>>>> might slow any progress to Moscow, they want Ukraine's vast resources
>>>>> and have already handed them over to American interests against the
>>>>> Ukrainian people. The fact that they've taken over a third of
>>>>> agricultural land there is already well known.
>>>>>
>>>>> Russia is not the bad guy here. America and the people who control it to
>>>>> destroy Western Civilization in addition to making Americans themselves
>>>>> poor are.
>>>>
>>>> Yep. The U.S. taxpayers are no longer giving billion$ to Ukraine, "we're"
>>>> "loaning" them the money we know they will never be able to repay, with
>>>> strings attached. Ukraine's natural resources become the Rothschild's (and
>>>> fellow slime's) resources. (How the American people are on the hook to fund
>>>> this "leveraged buyout" to benefit BlackRock, Vanguard and other
>>>> Rothschild-controlled entities is another question that Relf should answer.)
>>>> This is what they want for Russia — they basically had it in their grasping
>>>> claws, until Putin kicked these bastards out and started using Russia's
>>>> natural resources for Russians. The standard of living has gone way up under
>>>> Putin. He's also rebuilding churches and cities. Amazing what can be done
>>>> when a country's natural resources aren't being shoveled into the
>>>> Rothschild's greedy maw.
>>>
>>> And the American government would have you believe that giving away the
>>> country's land and resources to a few oligarchs is the American way. If
>>> they have their way, it will be impossible to own anything and you'll be
>>> forced to lease anything you use. They will have total control which
>>> means that if ever you stop playing by their rules, you'll be discarded
>>> from society. You might not be killed, but you'll be on the outside
>>> looking in, unable to survive for very long.
>>
>> Yep. And you're back to the situation found in the old communist countries,
>> the black market — which was (and will be) needed for survival.
>
> And this is why a lot of people are starting to believe that the wrong
> side won the Second World War. When London is no longer filled with the
> English and Western governments are all committing to censoring their
> citizens or punishing them for speaking out, it's hard to believe that
> the good guys won.

Follow the money. If the Rothschild's finance it, it's evil.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2024-09-30 3:03 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>
>> So that's answer. "1984" style censorship with its "thought police." This is
>> the goal of the Democrats, to completely control information and give us
>> only their side of the story. It's the Woke Cult. They already have this
>> control in the MSM, but "too much" truth "leaks out" on the Internet. They
>> want to shut that down and completely control the Internet as well.
>
> Since they have total control of the platforms where people can share
> the truth, including Telegram now, it is very important to hold onto
> ones where people can speak freely like Usenet or Gab. If we didn't have
> such platforms, we'd all have to repeat MSNBC talking points all day
> like Ahlstrom does if we wanted to hold onto our accounts or stay off
> the radar of the police. What's happening in England, with people
> getting a visit from the police or getting arrested for speaking out
> about an injustice is what's coming to America if people actually allow
> people like John Kerry to get what they want in crippling the First
> Amendment. We're already fucked in Canada.

I can't argue with any of this. This is what they want. Complete control of
thought. On September 22 (quietly) many countries in the U.N. signed on to a
"A Pact for the Future" — coordinated through the U.N. But it won't mean
much if Rothschild's minions (the U.S. and Britain and the EU) can't stop
Russia, China and BRICS.

https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/ltd/n24/252/89/pdf/n2425289.pdf

Skip the bullshit justification for this and go to the planned actions
(pages 55 and 56).

ACTIONS

Acknowledging the primary role and responsibility of governments at all
levels, in line with their respective constitutional frameworks, towards
safeguarding the needs and interests of future generations, we will
implement, institutionalize and monitor the above commitments in
national, regional and global policymaking by:

24. Leveraging science, data, statistics and strategic foresight to
ensure long-term thinking and planning, and to develop and implement
sustainable practices and the institutional reforms necessary to ensure
evidence-based decision-making, while making governance more
anticipatory, adaptive and responsive to future opportunities, risks and
challenges.

25. Ensuring inclusive and equitable access to knowledge, science and
information, while promoting innovation, critical thinking and life
skills to create generations of citizens that are agents of positive
change and transformation.

26. Strengthening our systems of national and global accounting,
including by promoting the use of forward-looking, evidence-based impact
assessments, developing stronger anticipatory risk analyses and
encouraging the use of measures of progress on sustainable development
that complement and go beyond gross domestic product.

27. Investing in capacity to better prepare for and respond to future
global shocks, crises and challenges, and using evidence-based planning
and foresight to avoid and mitigate risks, while ensuring that the
poorest and most vulnerable do not bear disproportionate costs and
burdens of mitigation, adaptation, restoration and resilience-building.

28. Undertaking a whole-of-government approach to coordination, including
at the national and local levels, on the assessment, development,
implementation and evaluation of policies that safeguard the needs and
interests of future generations.

29. Enhancing cooperation with stakeholders, including civil society,
academia, the scientific and technological community and the private
sector, and encouraging intergenerational partnerships, by promoting a
whole-of-society approach, to share best practices and develop
innovative, long-term and forward-thinking ideas in order to safeguard
the needs and interests of future generations.

30. Equipping the multilateral system, including the United Nations, to
support States, upon their request, in their efforts to implement this
Declaration and embed the needs and interests of future generations and
long-term thinking in policymaking processes by fostering cooperation and
facilitating greater use of anticipatory planning and foresight, based on
science, data and statistics, and raising awareness of and advising on
the likely intergenerational or future impacts of policies and
programmes.

31. Fostering an organizational culture that is future-oriented and
mainstreamed across the United Nations system in order to facilitate
science -- and evidence-based decision-making by developing diverse
capabilities, including anticipatory planning, foresight and futures
literacy, and systematically promoting long-term and intergenerational
thinking at all levels.

32. Recognizing the important advisory and advocacy role that the United
Nations should play with respect to future generations, we:

(a) Take note of the Secretary-General’s proposal to appoint a Special
Envoy for Future Generations to support the implementation of this
Declaration;

(b) Decide to convene an inclusive high-level plenary meeting of the
General Assembly on future generations that will review the
implementation of this Declaration during the eighty-third session of
the General Assembly and provide updates on the actions taken to
safeguard the needs and interests of future generations;

(c) Request the Secretary-General to present a report on the
implementation of this Declaration for consideration at the high-level
plenary meeting to be held during the eighty-third session of the
General Assembly.

Now you see why Kamala Harris spews out word salads and repeats words like
"holistic" continually. It's the language of those who are vague in how they
say it — but precise in what they mean. These are code words. Note that
there is not one mention of protecting citizen's freedom of religion or
right to free speech, but there are constant references to "science" and
"evidence-based decision making" (note they continually repeated the
"evidence-based science" for the Covid restrictions — Fauci finally
admitting that masks and the six feet distancing were just arbitrary
bullshit made up on the fly). But the mistakes they made in the past don't
matter to these tyrants.

Also note the the constant use of "change", "change agents" and
"transformation." In other words brainwashing citizens into the new world
order "group-think", i.e., Woke bullshit.

All this change will be "implemented, institutionalized and monitored" on a
"regional, national and global scale" by the United Nations. (Or least that
is their nightmare scenario. This is seriously sick crap, completely at odds
with the U.S. Constitution and the rights guaranteed in it.

Is it any wonder that that piece of shit John Kerry thinks our First
Amendment will get in the way of his worldwide gulag wet dream?

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 2024-10-01 2:42 a.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-09-30 2:52 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-29 2:12 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-09-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-09-29 11:45 a.m., Relf wrote:
>>>>>>> Huntzinger mentioned Russia's neighbors:
>>>>>>>> laying low to avoid being invaded by Russia again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Putin is that schoolyard bully who thinks he's "winning"
>>>>>>> because he steals the most lunch money.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Paleo conservatives" think he's like Christ,
>>>>>>> Sent by God to destroy America's atheism/Marxism.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeff, you're ignoring that America basically ignored the will of the
>>>>>> people in 2014 and handed over the territory of people who wanted to be
>>>>>> a part of Russia to Ukraine. You're also ignoring that Ukraine's puppet
>>>>>> government is purposefully looking to disregard the deal America made
>>>>>> with Russia in the early 90s _to_ make Russia defenseless in the event
>>>>>> of a war. Not only do they want to remove all natural obstacles that
>>>>>> might slow any progress to Moscow, they want Ukraine's vast resources
>>>>>> and have already handed them over to American interests against the
>>>>>> Ukrainian people. The fact that they've taken over a third of
>>>>>> agricultural land there is already well known.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Russia is not the bad guy here. America and the people who control it to
>>>>>> destroy Western Civilization in addition to making Americans themselves
>>>>>> poor are.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep. The U.S. taxpayers are no longer giving billion$ to Ukraine, "we're"
>>>>> "loaning" them the money we know they will never be able to repay, with
>>>>> strings attached. Ukraine's natural resources become the Rothschild's (and
>>>>> fellow slime's) resources. (How the American people are on the hook to fund
>>>>> this "leveraged buyout" to benefit BlackRock, Vanguard and other
>>>>> Rothschild-controlled entities is another question that Relf should answer.)
>>>>> This is what they want for Russia — they basically had it in their grasping
>>>>> claws, until Putin kicked these bastards out and started using Russia's
>>>>> natural resources for Russians. The standard of living has gone way up under
>>>>> Putin. He's also rebuilding churches and cities. Amazing what can be done
>>>>> when a country's natural resources aren't being shoveled into the
>>>>> Rothschild's greedy maw.
>>>>
>>>> And the American government would have you believe that giving away the
>>>> country's land and resources to a few oligarchs is the American way. If
>>>> they have their way, it will be impossible to own anything and you'll be
>>>> forced to lease anything you use. They will have total control which
>>>> means that if ever you stop playing by their rules, you'll be discarded
>>>> from society. You might not be killed, but you'll be on the outside
>>>> looking in, unable to survive for very long.
>>>
>>> Yep. And you're back to the situation found in the old communist countries,
>>> the black market — which was (and will be) needed for survival.
>>
>> And this is why a lot of people are starting to believe that the wrong
>> side won the Second World War. When London is no longer filled with the
>> English and Western governments are all committing to censoring their
>> citizens or punishing them for speaking out, it's hard to believe that
>> the good guys won.
>
> Follow the money. If the Rothschild's finance it, it's evil.

And I truly believe that the only way to counter it all will be to
inspire people to reject it at the local level. Elect a like-minded
mayor, a like-minded paliamentarian for your region, a like-minded
provincial premier and so on. If we attack them federally, it won't lead
to anything, but if the very people who are tasked to make their dreams
a reality refuse to go along with their project in the places where the
citizens live, we have a chance.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king

On 2024-10-01 3:29 a.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-09-30 3:03 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>>
>>> So that's answer. "1984" style censorship with its "thought police." This is
>>> the goal of the Democrats, to completely control information and give us
>>> only their side of the story. It's the Woke Cult. They already have this
>>> control in the MSM, but "too much" truth "leaks out" on the Internet. They
>>> want to shut that down and completely control the Internet as well.
>>
>> Since they have total control of the platforms where people can share
>> the truth, including Telegram now, it is very important to hold onto
>> ones where people can speak freely like Usenet or Gab. If we didn't have
>> such platforms, we'd all have to repeat MSNBC talking points all day
>> like Ahlstrom does if we wanted to hold onto our accounts or stay off
>> the radar of the police. What's happening in England, with people
>> getting a visit from the police or getting arrested for speaking out
>> about an injustice is what's coming to America if people actually allow
>> people like John Kerry to get what they want in crippling the First
>> Amendment. We're already fucked in Canada.
>
> I can't argue with any of this. This is what they want. Complete control of
> thought. On September 22 (quietly) many countries in the U.N. signed on to a
> "A Pact for the Future" — coordinated through the U.N. But it won't mean
> much if Rothschild's minions (the U.S. and Britain and the EU) can't stop
> Russia, China and BRICS.
>
> https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/ltd/n24/252/89/pdf/n2425289.pdf
>
> Skip the bullshit justification for this and go to the planned actions
> (pages 55 and 56).

Yeah, I saw it. It only highlights how the the United Nations is working
against the West. Luckily, they have no army and can't force any of
their decisions on anyone unless politicians agree with them.
Unfortunately, in Canada's case at least, our leadership has no backbone
whatsoever and believes such ideas are what's best.

> ACTIONS
>
> Acknowledging the primary role and responsibility of governments at all
> levels, in line with their respective constitutional frameworks, towards
> safeguarding the needs and interests of future generations, we will
> implement, institutionalize and monitor the above commitments in
> national, regional and global policymaking by:
>
> 24. Leveraging science, data, statistics and strategic foresight to
> ensure long-term thinking and planning, and to develop and implement
> sustainable practices and the institutional reforms necessary to ensure
> evidence-based decision-making, while making governance more
> anticipatory, adaptive and responsive to future opportunities, risks and
> challenges.
>
> 25. Ensuring inclusive and equitable access to knowledge, science and
> information, while promoting innovation, critical thinking and life
> skills to create generations of citizens that are agents of positive
> change and transformation.
>
> 26. Strengthening our systems of national and global accounting,
> including by promoting the use of forward-looking, evidence-based impact
> assessments, developing stronger anticipatory risk analyses and
> encouraging the use of measures of progress on sustainable development
> that complement and go beyond gross domestic product.
>
> 27. Investing in capacity to better prepare for and respond to future
> global shocks, crises and challenges, and using evidence-based planning
> and foresight to avoid and mitigate risks, while ensuring that the
> poorest and most vulnerable do not bear disproportionate costs and
> burdens of mitigation, adaptation, restoration and resilience-building.
>
> 28. Undertaking a whole-of-government approach to coordination, including
> at the national and local levels, on the assessment, development,
> implementation and evaluation of policies that safeguard the needs and
> interests of future generations.
>
> 29. Enhancing cooperation with stakeholders, including civil society,
> academia, the scientific and technological community and the private
> sector, and encouraging intergenerational partnerships, by promoting a
> whole-of-society approach, to share best practices and develop
> innovative, long-term and forward-thinking ideas in order to safeguard
> the needs and interests of future generations.
>
> 30. Equipping the multilateral system, including the United Nations, to
> support States, upon their request, in their efforts to implement this
> Declaration and embed the needs and interests of future generations and
> long-term thinking in policymaking processes by fostering cooperation and
> facilitating greater use of anticipatory planning and foresight, based on
> science, data and statistics, and raising awareness of and advising on
> the likely intergenerational or future impacts of policies and
> programmes.
>
> 31. Fostering an organizational culture that is future-oriented and
> mainstreamed across the United Nations system in order to facilitate
> science -- and evidence-based decision-making by developing diverse
> capabilities, including anticipatory planning, foresight and futures
> literacy, and systematically promoting long-term and intergenerational
> thinking at all levels.
>
> 32. Recognizing the important advisory and advocacy role that the United
> Nations should play with respect to future generations, we:
>
> (a) Take note of the Secretary-General’s proposal to appoint a Special
> Envoy for Future Generations to support the implementation of this
> Declaration;
>
> (b) Decide to convene an inclusive high-level plenary meeting of the
> General Assembly on future generations that will review the
> implementation of this Declaration during the eighty-third session of
> the General Assembly and provide updates on the actions taken to
> safeguard the needs and interests of future generations;
>
> (c) Request the Secretary-General to present a report on the
> implementation of this Declaration for consideration at the high-level
> plenary meeting to be held during the eighty-third session of the
> General Assembly.
>
> Now you see why Kamala Harris spews out word salads and repeats words like
> "holistic" continually. It's the language of those who are vague in how they
> say it — but precise in what they mean. These are code words. Note that
> there is not one mention of protecting citizen's freedom of religion or
> right to free speech, but there are constant references to "science" and
> "evidence-based decision making" (note they continually repeated the
> "evidence-based science" for the Covid restrictions — Fauci finally
> admitting that masks and the six feet distancing were just arbitrary
> bullshit made up on the fly). But the mistakes they made in the past don't
> matter to these tyrants.
>
> Also note the the constant use of "change", "change agents" and
> "transformation." In other words brainwashing citizens into the new world
> order "group-think", i.e., Woke bullshit.
>
> All this change will be "implemented, institutionalized and monitored" on a
> "regional, national and global scale" by the United Nations. (Or least that
> is their nightmare scenario. This is seriously sick crap, completely at odds
> with the U.S. Constitution and the rights guaranteed in it.
>
> Is it any wonder that that piece of shit John Kerry thinks our First
> Amendment will get in the way of his worldwide gulag wet dream?

If I were an American and had been considering voting for Harris either
as a competent leader or as an alternative to Trump, I would sooner just
stay home and let others have a voice. In any interview you watch with
her, she is either unable to answer a simple question or repeats
paragraphs she memorized that have nothing to do with what's being
asked. How is anyone supposed to believe that this person might help
curb inflation or improve their daily life unless they have a serious
shortage of testosterone like Chris Ahlstrom and can't notice the
extreme incompetence?

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king

"evidence-based science" is a gun pointing at your head.

On 2024-10-01, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2024-10-01 2:42 a.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-30 2:52 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-09-29 2:12 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-09-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-09-29 11:45 a.m., Relf wrote:
>>>>>>>> Huntzinger mentioned Russia's neighbors:
>>>>>>>>> laying low to avoid being invaded by Russia again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Putin is that schoolyard bully who thinks he's "winning"
>>>>>>>> because he steals the most lunch money.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Paleo conservatives" think he's like Christ,
>>>>>>>> Sent by God to destroy America's atheism/Marxism.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jeff, you're ignoring that America basically ignored the will of the
>>>>>>> people in 2014 and handed over the territory of people who wanted to be
>>>>>>> a part of Russia to Ukraine. You're also ignoring that Ukraine's puppet
>>>>>>> government is purposefully looking to disregard the deal America made
>>>>>>> with Russia in the early 90s _to_ make Russia defenseless in the event
>>>>>>> of a war. Not only do they want to remove all natural obstacles that
>>>>>>> might slow any progress to Moscow, they want Ukraine's vast resources
>>>>>>> and have already handed them over to American interests against the
>>>>>>> Ukrainian people. The fact that they've taken over a third of
>>>>>>> agricultural land there is already well known.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Russia is not the bad guy here. America and the people who control it to
>>>>>>> destroy Western Civilization in addition to making Americans themselves
>>>>>>> poor are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yep. The U.S. taxpayers are no longer giving billion$ to Ukraine, "we're"
>>>>>> "loaning" them the money we know they will never be able to repay, with
>>>>>> strings attached. Ukraine's natural resources become the Rothschild's (and
>>>>>> fellow slime's) resources. (How the American people are on the hook to fund
>>>>>> this "leveraged buyout" to benefit BlackRock, Vanguard and other
>>>>>> Rothschild-controlled entities is another question that Relf should answer.)
>>>>>> This is what they want for Russia — they basically had it in their grasping
>>>>>> claws, until Putin kicked these bastards out and started using Russia's
>>>>>> natural resources for Russians. The standard of living has gone way up under
>>>>>> Putin. He's also rebuilding churches and cities. Amazing what can be done
>>>>>> when a country's natural resources aren't being shoveled into the
>>>>>> Rothschild's greedy maw.
>>>>>
>>>>> And the American government would have you believe that giving away the
>>>>> country's land and resources to a few oligarchs is the American way. If
>>>>> they have their way, it will be impossible to own anything and you'll be
>>>>> forced to lease anything you use. They will have total control which
>>>>> means that if ever you stop playing by their rules, you'll be discarded
>>>>> from society. You might not be killed, but you'll be on the outside
>>>>> looking in, unable to survive for very long.
>>>>
>>>> Yep. And you're back to the situation found in the old communist countries,
>>>> the black market — which was (and will be) needed for survival.
>>>
>>> And this is why a lot of people are starting to believe that the wrong
>>> side won the Second World War. When London is no longer filled with the
>>> English and Western governments are all committing to censoring their
>>> citizens or punishing them for speaking out, it's hard to believe that
>>> the good guys won.
>>
>> Follow the money. If the Rothschild's finance it, it's evil.
>
> And I truly believe that the only way to counter it all will be to
> inspire people to reject it at the local level. Elect a like-minded
> mayor, a like-minded paliamentarian for your region, a like-minded
> provincial premier and so on. If we attack them federally, it won't lead
> to anything, but if the very people who are tasked to make their dreams
> a reality refuse to go along with their project in the places where the
> citizens live, we have a chance.

That's what my father says. We need to foster and encourage local industry
and farming and bypass the multi-national corporations. But they make it
hard to do, by shutting down local farmers who don't use GMO seeds or try to
sell whole milk. The Chamber of Commerce was started specifically to destroy
local businesses and encourage regional and national businesses in their
place.

A lot of rot in our country for a long, long time.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 2024-10-01, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2024-10-01 3:29 a.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-30 3:03 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So that's answer. "1984" style censorship with its "thought police." This is
>>>> the goal of the Democrats, to completely control information and give us
>>>> only their side of the story. It's the Woke Cult. They already have this
>>>> control in the MSM, but "too much" truth "leaks out" on the Internet. They
>>>> want to shut that down and completely control the Internet as well.
>>>
>>> Since they have total control of the platforms where people can share
>>> the truth, including Telegram now, it is very important to hold onto
>>> ones where people can speak freely like Usenet or Gab. If we didn't have
>>> such platforms, we'd all have to repeat MSNBC talking points all day
>>> like Ahlstrom does if we wanted to hold onto our accounts or stay off
>>> the radar of the police. What's happening in England, with people
>>> getting a visit from the police or getting arrested for speaking out
>>> about an injustice is what's coming to America if people actually allow
>>> people like John Kerry to get what they want in crippling the First
>>> Amendment. We're already fucked in Canada.
>>
>> I can't argue with any of this. This is what they want. Complete control of
>> thought. On September 22 (quietly) many countries in the U.N. signed on to a
>> "A Pact for the Future" — coordinated through the U.N. But it won't mean
>> much if Rothschild's minions (the U.S. and Britain and the EU) can't stop
>> Russia, China and BRICS.
>>
>> https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/ltd/n24/252/89/pdf/n2425289.pdf
>>
>> Skip the bullshit justification for this and go to the planned actions
>> (pages 55 and 56).
>
> Yeah, I saw it. It only highlights how the the United Nations is working
> against the West. Luckily, they have no army and can't force any of
> their decisions on anyone unless politicians agree with them.
> Unfortunately, in Canada's case at least, our leadership has no backbone
> whatsoever and believes such ideas are what's best.
>
>> ACTIONS
>>
>> Acknowledging the primary role and responsibility of governments at all
>> levels, in line with their respective constitutional frameworks, towards
>> safeguarding the needs and interests of future generations, we will
>> implement, institutionalize and monitor the above commitments in
>> national, regional and global policymaking by:
>>
>> 24. Leveraging science, data, statistics and strategic foresight to
>> ensure long-term thinking and planning, and to develop and implement
>> sustainable practices and the institutional reforms necessary to ensure
>> evidence-based decision-making, while making governance more
>> anticipatory, adaptive and responsive to future opportunities, risks and
>> challenges.
>>
>> 25. Ensuring inclusive and equitable access to knowledge, science and
>> information, while promoting innovation, critical thinking and life
>> skills to create generations of citizens that are agents of positive
>> change and transformation.
>>
>> 26. Strengthening our systems of national and global accounting,
>> including by promoting the use of forward-looking, evidence-based impact
>> assessments, developing stronger anticipatory risk analyses and
>> encouraging the use of measures of progress on sustainable development
>> that complement and go beyond gross domestic product.
>>
>> 27. Investing in capacity to better prepare for and respond to future
>> global shocks, crises and challenges, and using evidence-based planning
>> and foresight to avoid and mitigate risks, while ensuring that the
>> poorest and most vulnerable do not bear disproportionate costs and
>> burdens of mitigation, adaptation, restoration and resilience-building.
>>
>> 28. Undertaking a whole-of-government approach to coordination, including
>> at the national and local levels, on the assessment, development,
>> implementation and evaluation of policies that safeguard the needs and
>> interests of future generations.
>>
>> 29. Enhancing cooperation with stakeholders, including civil society,
>> academia, the scientific and technological community and the private
>> sector, and encouraging intergenerational partnerships, by promoting a
>> whole-of-society approach, to share best practices and develop
>> innovative, long-term and forward-thinking ideas in order to safeguard
>> the needs and interests of future generations.
>>
>> 30. Equipping the multilateral system, including the United Nations, to
>> support States, upon their request, in their efforts to implement this
>> Declaration and embed the needs and interests of future generations and
>> long-term thinking in policymaking processes by fostering cooperation and
>> facilitating greater use of anticipatory planning and foresight, based on
>> science, data and statistics, and raising awareness of and advising on
>> the likely intergenerational or future impacts of policies and
>> programmes.
>>
>> 31. Fostering an organizational culture that is future-oriented and
>> mainstreamed across the United Nations system in order to facilitate
>> science -- and evidence-based decision-making by developing diverse
>> capabilities, including anticipatory planning, foresight and futures
>> literacy, and systematically promoting long-term and intergenerational
>> thinking at all levels.
>>
>> 32. Recognizing the important advisory and advocacy role that the United
>> Nations should play with respect to future generations, we:
>>
>> (a) Take note of the Secretary-General’s proposal to appoint a Special
>> Envoy for Future Generations to support the implementation of this
>> Declaration;
>>
>> (b) Decide to convene an inclusive high-level plenary meeting of the
>> General Assembly on future generations that will review the
>> implementation of this Declaration during the eighty-third session of
>> the General Assembly and provide updates on the actions taken to
>> safeguard the needs and interests of future generations;
>>
>> (c) Request the Secretary-General to present a report on the
>> implementation of this Declaration for consideration at the high-level
>> plenary meeting to be held during the eighty-third session of the
>> General Assembly.
>>
>> Now you see why Kamala Harris spews out word salads and repeats words like
>> "holistic" continually. It's the language of those who are vague in how they
>> say it — but precise in what they mean. These are code words. Note that
>> there is not one mention of protecting citizen's freedom of religion or
>> right to free speech, but there are constant references to "science" and
>> "evidence-based decision making" (note they continually repeated the
>> "evidence-based science" for the Covid restrictions — Fauci finally
>> admitting that masks and the six feet distancing were just arbitrary
>> bullshit made up on the fly). But the mistakes they made in the past don't
>> matter to these tyrants.
>>
>> Also note the the constant use of "change", "change agents" and
>> "transformation." In other words brainwashing citizens into the new world
>> order "group-think", i.e., Woke bullshit.
>>
>> All this change will be "implemented, institutionalized and monitored" on a
>> "regional, national and global scale" by the United Nations. (Or least that
>> is their nightmare scenario. This is seriously sick crap, completely at odds
>> with the U.S. Constitution and the rights guaranteed in it.
>>
>> Is it any wonder that that piece of shit John Kerry thinks our First
>> Amendment will get in the way of his worldwide gulag wet dream?
>
> If I were an American and had been considering voting for Harris either
> as a competent leader or as an alternative to Trump, I would sooner just
> stay home and let others have a voice. In any interview you watch with
> her, she is either unable to answer a simple question or repeats
> paragraphs she memorized that have nothing to do with what's being
> asked. How is anyone supposed to believe that this person might help
> curb inflation or improve their daily life unless they have a serious
> shortage of testosterone like Chris Ahlstrom and can't notice the
> extreme incompetence?

On 2024-10-02 8:57 a.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-10-01, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-10-01 2:42 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-30 2:52 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-09-29 2:12 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-09-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-09-29 11:45 a.m., Relf wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger mentioned Russia's neighbors:
>>>>>>>>>> laying low to avoid being invaded by Russia again.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Putin is that schoolyard bully who thinks he's "winning"
>>>>>>>>> because he steals the most lunch money.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Paleo conservatives" think he's like Christ,
>>>>>>>>> Sent by God to destroy America's atheism/Marxism.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jeff, you're ignoring that America basically ignored the will of the
>>>>>>>> people in 2014 and handed over the territory of people who wanted to be
>>>>>>>> a part of Russia to Ukraine. You're also ignoring that Ukraine's puppet
>>>>>>>> government is purposefully looking to disregard the deal America made
>>>>>>>> with Russia in the early 90s _to_ make Russia defenseless in the event
>>>>>>>> of a war. Not only do they want to remove all natural obstacles that
>>>>>>>> might slow any progress to Moscow, they want Ukraine's vast resources
>>>>>>>> and have already handed them over to American interests against the
>>>>>>>> Ukrainian people. The fact that they've taken over a third of
>>>>>>>> agricultural land there is already well known.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Russia is not the bad guy here. America and the people who control it to
>>>>>>>> destroy Western Civilization in addition to making Americans themselves
>>>>>>>> poor are.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yep. The U.S. taxpayers are no longer giving billion$ to Ukraine, "we're"
>>>>>>> "loaning" them the money we know they will never be able to repay, with
>>>>>>> strings attached. Ukraine's natural resources become the Rothschild's (and
>>>>>>> fellow slime's) resources. (How the American people are on the hook to fund
>>>>>>> this "leveraged buyout" to benefit BlackRock, Vanguard and other
>>>>>>> Rothschild-controlled entities is another question that Relf should answer.)
>>>>>>> This is what they want for Russia — they basically had it in their grasping
>>>>>>> claws, until Putin kicked these bastards out and started using Russia's
>>>>>>> natural resources for Russians. The standard of living has gone way up under
>>>>>>> Putin. He's also rebuilding churches and cities. Amazing what can be done
>>>>>>> when a country's natural resources aren't being shoveled into the
>>>>>>> Rothschild's greedy maw.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And the American government would have you believe that giving away the
>>>>>> country's land and resources to a few oligarchs is the American way. If
>>>>>> they have their way, it will be impossible to own anything and you'll be
>>>>>> forced to lease anything you use. They will have total control which
>>>>>> means that if ever you stop playing by their rules, you'll be discarded
>>>>>> from society. You might not be killed, but you'll be on the outside
>>>>>> looking in, unable to survive for very long.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep. And you're back to the situation found in the old communist countries,
>>>>> the black market — which was (and will be) needed for survival.
>>>>
>>>> And this is why a lot of people are starting to believe that the wrong
>>>> side won the Second World War. When London is no longer filled with the
>>>> English and Western governments are all committing to censoring their
>>>> citizens or punishing them for speaking out, it's hard to believe that
>>>> the good guys won.
>>>
>>> Follow the money. If the Rothschild's finance it, it's evil.
>>
>> And I truly believe that the only way to counter it all will be to
>> inspire people to reject it at the local level. Elect a like-minded
>> mayor, a like-minded paliamentarian for your region, a like-minded
>> provincial premier and so on. If we attack them federally, it won't lead
>> to anything, but if the very people who are tasked to make their dreams
>> a reality refuse to go along with their project in the places where the
>> citizens live, we have a chance.
>
> That's what my father says. We need to foster and encourage local industry
> and farming and bypass the multi-national corporations. But they make it
> hard to do, by shutting down local farmers who don't use GMO seeds or try to
> sell whole milk.

The strategy is that they will convince someone neighbouring the
traditional farm to try those GMO seeds and when those crops inevitably
transfer over to the organic farm through wind, they will sue the farmer
into oblivion for growing their product without authorization. Those who
tried the seed and want to continue using them will be sued if they
saved the seeds from the previous year, something that farmers have been
doing since the beginning of time. Even if the farmers play ball, the
company can gouge them through the price of fertilizer, insecticide and
herbicide, the latter two of which become a lot more expensive than they
were initially because the weeds and insects become resistant and
suddenly require twice or thrice the amount to kill. Even if it all
works, whoever buys the food ends up losing because the food itself
inevitably becomes toxic and they will have no choice but to buy
organic, now available in limited supply, to circumvent the allergic
reactions they get to conventional (toxic) crops.

It's pure evil.

> The Chamber of Commerce was started specifically to destroy
> local businesses and encourage regional and national businesses in their
> place.
>
> A lot of rot in our country for a long, long time.

One has to wonder how the type of farm proposed by the Chamber of
Commerce is different from the collective farms the Communists had.

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king

On 2024-10-02 9:01 a.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-10-01, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-10-01 3:29 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-30 3:03 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> So that's answer. "1984" style censorship with its "thought police." This is
>>>>> the goal of the Democrats, to completely control information and give us
>>>>> only their side of the story. It's the Woke Cult. They already have this
>>>>> control in the MSM, but "too much" truth "leaks out" on the Internet. They
>>>>> want to shut that down and completely control the Internet as well.
>>>>
>>>> Since they have total control of the platforms where people can share
>>>> the truth, including Telegram now, it is very important to hold onto
>>>> ones where people can speak freely like Usenet or Gab. If we didn't have
>>>> such platforms, we'd all have to repeat MSNBC talking points all day
>>>> like Ahlstrom does if we wanted to hold onto our accounts or stay off
>>>> the radar of the police. What's happening in England, with people
>>>> getting a visit from the police or getting arrested for speaking out
>>>> about an injustice is what's coming to America if people actually allow
>>>> people like John Kerry to get what they want in crippling the First
>>>> Amendment. We're already fucked in Canada.
>>>
>>> I can't argue with any of this. This is what they want. Complete control of
>>> thought. On September 22 (quietly) many countries in the U.N. signed on to a
>>> "A Pact for the Future" — coordinated through the U.N. But it won't mean
>>> much if Rothschild's minions (the U.S. and Britain and the EU) can't stop
>>> Russia, China and BRICS.
>>>
>>> https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/ltd/n24/252/89/pdf/n2425289.pdf
>>>
>>> Skip the bullshit justification for this and go to the planned actions
>>> (pages 55 and 56).
>>
>> Yeah, I saw it. It only highlights how the the United Nations is working
>> against the West. Luckily, they have no army and can't force any of
>> their decisions on anyone unless politicians agree with them.
>> Unfortunately, in Canada's case at least, our leadership has no backbone
>> whatsoever and believes such ideas are what's best.
>>
>>> ACTIONS
>>>
>>> Acknowledging the primary role and responsibility of governments at all
>>> levels, in line with their respective constitutional frameworks, towards
>>> safeguarding the needs and interests of future generations, we will
>>> implement, institutionalize and monitor the above commitments in
>>> national, regional and global policymaking by:
>>>
>>> 24. Leveraging science, data, statistics and strategic foresight to
>>> ensure long-term thinking and planning, and to develop and implement
>>> sustainable practices and the institutional reforms necessary to ensure
>>> evidence-based decision-making, while making governance more
>>> anticipatory, adaptive and responsive to future opportunities, risks and
>>> challenges.
>>>
>>> 25. Ensuring inclusive and equitable access to knowledge, science and
>>> information, while promoting innovation, critical thinking and life
>>> skills to create generations of citizens that are agents of positive
>>> change and transformation.
>>>
>>> 26. Strengthening our systems of national and global accounting,
>>> including by promoting the use of forward-looking, evidence-based impact
>>> assessments, developing stronger anticipatory risk analyses and
>>> encouraging the use of measures of progress on sustainable development
>>> that complement and go beyond gross domestic product.
>>>
>>> 27. Investing in capacity to better prepare for and respond to future
>>> global shocks, crises and challenges, and using evidence-based planning
>>> and foresight to avoid and mitigate risks, while ensuring that the
>>> poorest and most vulnerable do not bear disproportionate costs and
>>> burdens of mitigation, adaptation, restoration and resilience-building.
>>>
>>> 28. Undertaking a whole-of-government approach to coordination, including
>>> at the national and local levels, on the assessment, development,
>>> implementation and evaluation of policies that safeguard the needs and
>>> interests of future generations.
>>>
>>> 29. Enhancing cooperation with stakeholders, including civil society,
>>> academia, the scientific and technological community and the private
>>> sector, and encouraging intergenerational partnerships, by promoting a
>>> whole-of-society approach, to share best practices and develop
>>> innovative, long-term and forward-thinking ideas in order to safeguard
>>> the needs and interests of future generations.
>>>
>>> 30. Equipping the multilateral system, including the United Nations, to
>>> support States, upon their request, in their efforts to implement this
>>> Declaration and embed the needs and interests of future generations and
>>> long-term thinking in policymaking processes by fostering cooperation and
>>> facilitating greater use of anticipatory planning and foresight, based on
>>> science, data and statistics, and raising awareness of and advising on
>>> the likely intergenerational or future impacts of policies and
>>> programmes.
>>>
>>> 31. Fostering an organizational culture that is future-oriented and
>>> mainstreamed across the United Nations system in order to facilitate
>>> science -- and evidence-based decision-making by developing diverse
>>> capabilities, including anticipatory planning, foresight and futures
>>> literacy, and systematically promoting long-term and intergenerational
>>> thinking at all levels.
>>>
>>> 32. Recognizing the important advisory and advocacy role that the United
>>> Nations should play with respect to future generations, we:
>>>
>>> (a) Take note of the Secretary-General’s proposal to appoint a Special
>>> Envoy for Future Generations to support the implementation of this
>>> Declaration;
>>>
>>> (b) Decide to convene an inclusive high-level plenary meeting of the
>>> General Assembly on future generations that will review the
>>> implementation of this Declaration during the eighty-third session of
>>> the General Assembly and provide updates on the actions taken to
>>> safeguard the needs and interests of future generations;
>>>
>>> (c) Request the Secretary-General to present a report on the
>>> implementation of this Declaration for consideration at the high-level
>>> plenary meeting to be held during the eighty-third session of the
>>> General Assembly.
>>>
>>> Now you see why Kamala Harris spews out word salads and repeats words like
>>> "holistic" continually. It's the language of those who are vague in how they
>>> say it — but precise in what they mean. These are code words. Note that
>>> there is not one mention of protecting citizen's freedom of religion or
>>> right to free speech, but there are constant references to "science" and
>>> "evidence-based decision making" (note they continually repeated the
>>> "evidence-based science" for the Covid restrictions — Fauci finally
>>> admitting that masks and the six feet distancing were just arbitrary
>>> bullshit made up on the fly). But the mistakes they made in the past don't
>>> matter to these tyrants.
>>>
>>> Also note the the constant use of "change", "change agents" and
>>> "transformation." In other words brainwashing citizens into the new world
>>> order "group-think", i.e., Woke bullshit.
>>>
>>> All this change will be "implemented, institutionalized and monitored" on a
>>> "regional, national and global scale" by the United Nations. (Or least that
>>> is their nightmare scenario. This is seriously sick crap, completely at odds
>>> with the U.S. Constitution and the rights guaranteed in it.
>>>
>>> Is it any wonder that that piece of shit John Kerry thinks our First
>>> Amendment will get in the way of his worldwide gulag wet dream?
>>
>> If I were an American and had been considering voting for Harris either
>> as a competent leader or as an alternative to Trump, I would sooner just
>> stay home and let others have a voice. In any interview you watch with
>> her, she is either unable to answer a simple question or repeats
>> paragraphs she memorized that have nothing to do with what's being
>> asked. How is anyone supposed to believe that this person might help
>> curb inflation or improve their daily life unless they have a serious
>> shortage of testosterone like Chris Ahlstrom and can't notice the
>> extreme incompetence?
>
> Chris Ahlstrom made it clear how deluded he is when he said he would vote
> for Biden, "even if he was in hospice care." They call it "Trump Derangement
> Syndome." And the sad thing is, despite Trump's clearer message, he's not
> all that much better than Harris. Both take their marching orders from the
> Deep State (i.e., the Rothschilds). We're basically screwed when it comes to
> the so-called "two party" (same party) system in this country. I'm not
> voting for either Trump or Harris, neither one is worth a shit.

On 2024-10-02, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> On 2024-10-02 8:57 a.m., RonB wrote:
>> On 2024-10-01, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>> On 2024-10-01 2:42 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-09-30 2:52 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-09-29 2:12 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-09-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2024-09-29 11:45 a.m., Relf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger mentioned Russia's neighbors:
>>>>>>>>>>> laying low to avoid being invaded by Russia again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Putin is that schoolyard bully who thinks he's "winning"
>>>>>>>>>> because he steals the most lunch money.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Paleo conservatives" think he's like Christ,
>>>>>>>>>> Sent by God to destroy America's atheism/Marxism.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jeff, you're ignoring that America basically ignored the will of the
>>>>>>>>> people in 2014 and handed over the territory of people who wanted to be
>>>>>>>>> a part of Russia to Ukraine. You're also ignoring that Ukraine's puppet
>>>>>>>>> government is purposefully looking to disregard the deal America made
>>>>>>>>> with Russia in the early 90s _to_ make Russia defenseless in the event
>>>>>>>>> of a war. Not only do they want to remove all natural obstacles that
>>>>>>>>> might slow any progress to Moscow, they want Ukraine's vast resources
>>>>>>>>> and have already handed them over to American interests against the
>>>>>>>>> Ukrainian people. The fact that they've taken over a third of
>>>>>>>>> agricultural land there is already well known.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Russia is not the bad guy here. America and the people who control it to
>>>>>>>>> destroy Western Civilization in addition to making Americans themselves
>>>>>>>>> poor are.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yep. The U.S. taxpayers are no longer giving billion$ to Ukraine, "we're"
>>>>>>>> "loaning" them the money we know they will never be able to repay, with
>>>>>>>> strings attached. Ukraine's natural resources become the Rothschild's (and
>>>>>>>> fellow slime's) resources. (How the American people are on the hook to fund
>>>>>>>> this "leveraged buyout" to benefit BlackRock, Vanguard and other
>>>>>>>> Rothschild-controlled entities is another question that Relf should answer.)
>>>>>>>> This is what they want for Russia — they basically had it in their grasping
>>>>>>>> claws, until Putin kicked these bastards out and started using Russia's
>>>>>>>> natural resources for Russians. The standard of living has gone way up under
>>>>>>>> Putin. He's also rebuilding churches and cities. Amazing what can be done
>>>>>>>> when a country's natural resources aren't being shoveled into the
>>>>>>>> Rothschild's greedy maw.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And the American government would have you believe that giving away the
>>>>>>> country's land and resources to a few oligarchs is the American way. If
>>>>>>> they have their way, it will be impossible to own anything and you'll be
>>>>>>> forced to lease anything you use. They will have total control which
>>>>>>> means that if ever you stop playing by their rules, you'll be discarded
>>>>>>> from society. You might not be killed, but you'll be on the outside
>>>>>>> looking in, unable to survive for very long.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yep. And you're back to the situation found in the old communist countries,
>>>>>> the black market — which was (and will be) needed for survival.
>>>>>
>>>>> And this is why a lot of people are starting to believe that the wrong
>>>>> side won the Second World War. When London is no longer filled with the
>>>>> English and Western governments are all committing to censoring their
>>>>> citizens or punishing them for speaking out, it's hard to believe that
>>>>> the good guys won.
>>>>
>>>> Follow the money. If the Rothschild's finance it, it's evil.
>>>
>>> And I truly believe that the only way to counter it all will be to
>>> inspire people to reject it at the local level. Elect a like-minded
>>> mayor, a like-minded paliamentarian for your region, a like-minded
>>> provincial premier and so on. If we attack them federally, it won't lead
>>> to anything, but if the very people who are tasked to make their dreams
>>> a reality refuse to go along with their project in the places where the
>>> citizens live, we have a chance.
>>
>> That's what my father says. We need to foster and encourage local industry
>> and farming and bypass the multi-national corporations. But they make it
>> hard to do, by shutting down local farmers who don't use GMO seeds or try to
>> sell whole milk.
>
> The strategy is that they will convince someone neighbouring the
> traditional farm to try those GMO seeds and when those crops inevitably
> transfer over to the organic farm through wind, they will sue the farmer
> into oblivion for growing their product without authorization. Those who
> tried the seed and want to continue using them will be sued if they
> saved the seeds from the previous year, something that farmers have been
> doing since the beginning of time. Even if the farmers play ball, the
> company can gouge them through the price of fertilizer, insecticide and
> herbicide, the latter two of which become a lot more expensive than they
> were initially because the weeds and insects become resistant and
> suddenly require twice or thrice the amount to kill. Even if it all
> works, whoever buys the food ends up losing because the food itself
> inevitably becomes toxic and they will have no choice but to buy
> organic, now available in limited supply, to circumvent the allergic
> reactions they get to conventional (toxic) crops.
>
> It's pure evil.

It absolutely is. And the only way these bastards can get away with it is
that the judges are as corrupt as they are. I think (in Canada?) one farmer
actually successfully sued one of these crap GMO seed companies for
contaminating his field with their GMO crap. More farmers need to do this,
but most probably can't afford to.

Apparently Russia is completely getting rid of GMO crops. Another area where
they're doing it right — and another reason why the Rothschild owned
conglomerates absolutely "must" destroy Russia. You can't have farmers
independent of their monopolies. It might catch on.

>> The Chamber of Commerce was started specifically to destroy
>> local businesses and encourage regional and national businesses in their
>> place.
>>
>> A lot of rot in our country for a long, long time.
>
> One has to wonder how the type of farm proposed by the Chamber of
> Commerce is different from the collective farms the Communists had.

Exactly.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien

On 2024-10-03 6:12 a.m., RonB wrote:
> On 2024-10-02, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>> On 2024-10-02 8:57 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>> On 2024-10-01, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-10-01 2:42 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-09-30 2:52 a.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-09-30, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-09-29 2:12 p.m., RonB wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2024-09-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2024-09-29 11:45 a.m., Relf wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Huntzinger mentioned Russia's neighbors:
>>>>>>>>>>>> laying low to avoid being invaded by Russia again.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Putin is that schoolyard bully who thinks he's "winning"
>>>>>>>>>>> because he steals the most lunch money.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "Paleo conservatives" think he's like Christ,
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent by God to destroy America's atheism/Marxism.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jeff, you're ignoring that America basically ignored the will of the
>>>>>>>>>> people in 2014 and handed over the territory of people who wanted to be
>>>>>>>>>> a part of Russia to Ukraine. You're also ignoring that Ukraine's puppet
>>>>>>>>>> government is purposefully looking to disregard the deal America made
>>>>>>>>>> with Russia in the early 90s _to_ make Russia defenseless in the event
>>>>>>>>>> of a war. Not only do they want to remove all natural obstacles that
>>>>>>>>>> might slow any progress to Moscow, they want Ukraine's vast resources
>>>>>>>>>> and have already handed them over to American interests against the
>>>>>>>>>> Ukrainian people. The fact that they've taken over a third of
>>>>>>>>>> agricultural land there is already well known.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Russia is not the bad guy here. America and the people who control it to
>>>>>>>>>> destroy Western Civilization in addition to making Americans themselves
>>>>>>>>>> poor are.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yep. The U.S. taxpayers are no longer giving billion$ to Ukraine, "we're"
>>>>>>>>> "loaning" them the money we know they will never be able to repay, with
>>>>>>>>> strings attached. Ukraine's natural resources become the Rothschild's (and
>>>>>>>>> fellow slime's) resources. (How the American people are on the hook to fund
>>>>>>>>> this "leveraged buyout" to benefit BlackRock, Vanguard and other
>>>>>>>>> Rothschild-controlled entities is another question that Relf should answer.)
>>>>>>>>> This is what they want for Russia — they basically had it in their grasping
>>>>>>>>> claws, until Putin kicked these bastards out and started using Russia's
>>>>>>>>> natural resources for Russians. The standard of living has gone way up under
>>>>>>>>> Putin. He's also rebuilding churches and cities. Amazing what can be done
>>>>>>>>> when a country's natural resources aren't being shoveled into the
>>>>>>>>> Rothschild's greedy maw.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And the American government would have you believe that giving away the
>>>>>>>> country's land and resources to a few oligarchs is the American way. If
>>>>>>>> they have their way, it will be impossible to own anything and you'll be
>>>>>>>> forced to lease anything you use. They will have total control which
>>>>>>>> means that if ever you stop playing by their rules, you'll be discarded
>>>>>>>> from society. You might not be killed, but you'll be on the outside
>>>>>>>> looking in, unable to survive for very long.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yep. And you're back to the situation found in the old communist countries,
>>>>>>> the black market — which was (and will be) needed for survival.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And this is why a lot of people are starting to believe that the wrong
>>>>>> side won the Second World War. When London is no longer filled with the
>>>>>> English and Western governments are all committing to censoring their
>>>>>> citizens or punishing them for speaking out, it's hard to believe that
>>>>>> the good guys won.
>>>>>
>>>>> Follow the money. If the Rothschild's finance it, it's evil.
>>>>
>>>> And I truly believe that the only way to counter it all will be to
>>>> inspire people to reject it at the local level. Elect a like-minded
>>>> mayor, a like-minded paliamentarian for your region, a like-minded
>>>> provincial premier and so on. If we attack them federally, it won't lead
>>>> to anything, but if the very people who are tasked to make their dreams
>>>> a reality refuse to go along with their project in the places where the
>>>> citizens live, we have a chance.
>>>
>>> That's what my father says. We need to foster and encourage local industry
>>> and farming and bypass the multi-national corporations. But they make it
>>> hard to do, by shutting down local farmers who don't use GMO seeds or try to
>>> sell whole milk.
>>
>> The strategy is that they will convince someone neighbouring the
>> traditional farm to try those GMO seeds and when those crops inevitably
>> transfer over to the organic farm through wind, they will sue the farmer
>> into oblivion for growing their product without authorization. Those who
>> tried the seed and want to continue using them will be sued if they
>> saved the seeds from the previous year, something that farmers have been
>> doing since the beginning of time. Even if the farmers play ball, the
>> company can gouge them through the price of fertilizer, insecticide and
>> herbicide, the latter two of which become a lot more expensive than they
>> were initially because the weeds and insects become resistant and
>> suddenly require twice or thrice the amount to kill. Even if it all
>> works, whoever buys the food ends up losing because the food itself
>> inevitably becomes toxic and they will have no choice but to buy
>> organic, now available in limited supply, to circumvent the allergic
>> reactions they get to conventional (toxic) crops.
>>
>> It's pure evil.
>
> It absolutely is. And the only way these bastards can get away with it is
> that the judges are as corrupt as they are. I think (in Canada?) one farmer
> actually successfully sued one of these crap GMO seed companies for
> contaminating his field with their GMO crap. More farmers need to do this,
> but most probably can't afford to.

I believe that they made a movie about it called Percy, starring
Christopher Walken. If I'm not mistaken, he was able to sue because he
made sure that it was a collective lawsuit.

> Apparently Russia is completely getting rid of GMO crops. Another area where
> they're doing it right — and another reason why the Rothschild owned
> conglomerates absolutely "must" destroy Russia. You can't have farmers
> independent of their monopolies. It might catch on.

Russia wants to prioritize the nuclear family, to encourage people to
have kids, to have organic crops, for people of different faiths to
unite under one national banner... the monster! For what it's worth, I
think that RT is an excellent news source as it relates to world news
superior to the Canadian and American agencies.

< snip >

--
CrudeSausage
Catholic, paleoconservative, Christ is king