[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Mittens Romney <robberbaron@invalid.ut> wrote:
>
>>>> I'm not God.
>>>>
>>>> But His will will come to pass.
>>>
>>> Look at my first and last initials below - I definitely am doing "His"
>>> will.
>>
>>You are not of God, that much is evident.
>
>
>Guess again, I'm the second coming of Christ. The New Testament talks
>explicitly about me.

Yes it does. It talks about how Jesus dealt with you.

Mark 5:1-5

They went across the lake to the region of the Gerasenes.[a] 2 When
Jesus got out of the boat, a man with an impure spirit came from the
tombs to meet him. 3 This man lived in the tombs, and no one could
bind him anymore, not even with a chain. 4 For he had often been
chained hand and foot, but he tore the chains apart and broke the
irons on his feet. No one was strong enough to subdue him. 5 Night and
day among the tombs and in the hills he would cry out and cut himself
with stones.

Didn't know you were strong enough to break chains, though.

Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>
>> Mittens Romney <robberbaron@invalid.ut> wrote:
>>
>>>>> I'm not God.
>>>>>
>>>>> But His will will come to pass.
>>>>
>>>> Look at my first and last initials below - I definitely am doing "His"
>>>> will.
>>>
>>> You are not of God, that much is evident.
>>
>>
>> Guess again, I'm the second coming of Christ. The New Testament talks
>> explicitly about me.
>
> Yes it does. It talks about how Jesus dealt with you.
>
> Mark 5:1-5
>
> They went across the lake to the region of the Gerasenes.[a] 2 When
> Jesus got out of the boat, a man with an impure spirit came from the
> tombs to meet him. 3 This man lived in the tombs, and no one could
> bind him anymore, not even with a chain. 4 For he had often been
> chained hand and foot, but he tore the chains apart and broke the
> irons on his feet. No one was strong enough to subdue him. 5 Night and
> day among the tombs and in the hills he would cry out and cut himself
> with stones.
>
> Didn't know you were strong enough to break chains, though.
>
The Gadderine's swine episode, good citation.

--
⛨ 🥐🥖🗼🤪

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:

>>I'm the second coming of Christ. The New Testament talks
>>explicitly about me.
>
>Yes it does. It talks about how Jesus dealt with you.
>
>Mark 5:1-5
>
>They went across the lake to the region of the Gerasenes.[a] 2 When
>Jesus got out of the boat, a man with an impure spirit came from the
>tombs to meet him. 3 This man lived in the tombs, and no one could
>bind him anymore, not even with a chain. 4 For he had often been
>chained hand and foot, but he tore the chains apart and broke the
>irons on his feet. No one was strong enough to subdue him. 5 Night and
>day among the tombs and in the hills he would cry out and cut himself
>with stones.
>
>Didn't know you were strong enough to break chains, though.

OK boomer.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

[Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:

>Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>>I'm the second coming of Christ. The New Testament talks
>>>explicitly about me.
>>
>>Yes it does. It talks about how Jesus dealt with you.
>>
>>Mark 5:1-5
>>
>>They went across the lake to the region of the Gerasenes.[a] 2 When
>>Jesus got out of the boat, a man with an impure spirit came from the
>>tombs to meet him. 3 This man lived in the tombs, and no one could
>>bind him anymore, not even with a chain. 4 For he had often been
>>chained hand and foot, but he tore the chains apart and broke the
>>irons on his feet. No one was strong enough to subdue him. 5 Night and
>>day among the tombs and in the hills he would cry out and cut himself
>>with stones.
>>
>>Didn't know you were strong enough to break chains, though.
>
>
>OK boomer.

Hey, I'd be angry that Jesus did such a shitty job fixing you.

On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 12:41:03 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

>NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:04:24 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>kami <f00@0f0.00f> wrote:
>>>
>>>>again cant find the original, but i think only those over the age
>>>>of 18 should be allowed to cut their peepee.
>>>
>>>It's never done below the age of 16, rarely before 18. This isn't a
>>>real problem, just a rhetorical point for the phobes, dishonestly.
>>
>>Citations please?
>
>
>I know what I'm talking about, I was referring to within the U.S.,
>though, it should be noted.
>

So you can't support your claim??

>
>>Honestly hormone therapy should not be used before 18 either.
>
>
>No.

I'm glad we agree!

[Default] ??????????Jen?????????? Dershmender ????????????????????
<root@127.0.0.1> typed:

>Perhaps it is you who need to cite the number of times that this thing has happened that you seek to prevent, and for what reason you jackals want your government stepping into people's private elective medical decisions.

"If we can save just one child..."

So how much child abuse and child mutilation are you willing to
accept?

NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

>>>>It's [GAC surgery] never done below the age of 16, rarely before 18. This isn't a
>>>>real problem, just a rhetorical point for the phobes, dishonestly.
>>>
>>>Citations please?
>>
>>I know what I'm talking about, I was referring to within the U.S.,
>>though, it should be noted.
>
>So you can't support your claim??

I defy you to refute it.

>>>Honestly hormone therapy should not be used before 18 either.
>>
>>No.
>
>I'm glad we agree!

We do not.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
wrote:
>[Default] ??????????Jen?????????? Dershmender ????????????????????
><root@127.0.0.1> typed:
>
>>Perhaps it is you who need to cite the number of times that this thing has happened that you seek to prevent, and for what reason you jackals want your government stepping into people's private elective medical decisions.
>
>"If we can save just one child..."
>
>So how much child abuse and child mutilation are you willing to
>accept?

If you think about what a low percentage of 16-17 year-old individuals
have GAC surgery (i.e., a percentage of the percentage that are trans
in the first place), and the fact that they're old enough to drive,
maybe you'd stop being so stupid.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
> [Default] Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> typed:
>
>> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> I'm the second coming of Christ. The New Testament talks
>>>> explicitly about me.
>>>
>>> Yes it does. It talks about how Jesus dealt with you.
>>>
>>> Mark 5:1-5
>>>
>>> They went across the lake to the region of the Gerasenes.[a] 2 When
>>> Jesus got out of the boat, a man with an impure spirit came from the
>>> tombs to meet him. 3 This man lived in the tombs, and no one could
>>> bind him anymore, not even with a chain. 4 For he had often been
>>> chained hand and foot, but he tore the chains apart and broke the
>>> irons on his feet. No one was strong enough to subdue him. 5 Night and
>>> day among the tombs and in the hills he would cry out and cut himself
>>> with stones.
>>>
>>> Didn't know you were strong enough to break chains, though.
>>
>>
>> OK boomer.
>
> Hey, I'd be angry that Jesus did such a shitty job fixing you.
>
That may be in the Father's purview yet.

--
⛨ 🥐🥖🗼🤪

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:atbbfj560p2ebge86bmn36eapk28m6ib6m@4ax.com...
> Mittens Romney <robberbaron@invalid.ut> wrote:
>
>>>> I'm not God.
>>>>
>>>> But His will will come to pass.
>>>
>>> Look at my first and last initials below - I definitely am doing "His"
>>> will.
>>
>>You are not of God, that much is evident.
>
>
> Guess again, I'm the second coming of Christ. The New Testament talks
> explicitly about me.

That would be the anti-christ then.

Meanwhile, let's just add this to the list of things you're delusional
about.

"Mittens Romney" <robberbaron@invalid.ut> wrote in message
news:vd4cre$biq4$2@dont-email.me...
> Joel wrote:
>> Mittens Romney <robberbaron@invalid.ut> wrote:
>>
>>>>> I'm not God.
>>>>>
>>>>> But His will will come to pass.
>>>>
>>>> Look at my first and last initials below - I definitely am doing "His"
>>>> will.
>>>
>>> You are not of God, that much is evident.
>>
>>
>> Guess again, I'm the second coming of Christ. The New Testament talks
>> explicitly about me.
>
> Oh does it, where?

Ref: "anti-christ"

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:aphdfjht82s2tp79e7ahqembjgqeg3uqca@4ax.com...
> Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentöter.@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>[Default] ??????????Jen?????????? Dershmender ????????????????????
>><root@127.0.0.1> typed:
>>
>>>Perhaps it is you who need to cite the number of times that this thing
>>>has happened that you seek to prevent, and for what reason you jackals
>>>want your government stepping into people's private elective medical
>>>decisions.
>>
>>"If we can save just one child..."
>>
>>So how much child abuse and child mutilation are you willing to
>>accept?
>
>
> If you think about what a low percentage of 16-17 year-old individuals
> have GAC surgery (i.e., a percentage of the percentage that are trans
> in the first place), and the fact that they're old enough to drive,
> maybe you'd stop being so stupid.

So you're saying kids as young as 12 and possibly even lower should be
allowed to undergo irreversible life altering surgery?

After all, since they can drive that must make them old enough, right?

On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:02:26 -0500, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:

>So you're saying kids as young as 12 and possibly even lower should be
>allowed to undergo irreversible life altering surgery?
>
>After all, since they can drive that must make them old enough, right?

12 is not old enough to drive. In what state is that the legal driving age?

--

Today's two reasons to not vote for Trump in 39 days.

15) Recommended Fake COVID cures like injecting disinfectant or
hydroxychloroquine. After the injection comments, poison centers
received a spike in calls.

16) Trump presided over a *net* loss of 2.9 million jobs.
That's the worst performance of any President, ever.

Governor Swill wrote:
> In what state is that the legal

Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A
Terrell/Chris Ahlstrom/Intelligent Party and a few dozen other socks wrote:

@Multiple death threats against Trump@
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <emo79jh20rlasuask9094vtlepuu5ui0av@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$dFU1.83026@fx11.ams4> <XnsB1AF52A9CDF3B629555@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <4ln79j914cpespbrssonesbciii33ess3m@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400

Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Governor Swill wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:02:26 -0500, "Scout"
> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>So you're saying kids as young as 12 and possibly even lower should be
>>allowed to undergo irreversible life altering surgery?
>>
>>After all, since they can drive that must make them old enough, right?
>
> 12 is not old enough to drive. In what state is that the legal driving age?

In whatever state has rural areas that the cops don't cover. :-)

"My kid Jeeter really knows how to handle a combine!"

--
Just because everything is different doesn't mean anything has changed.
-- Irene Peter

On 2024-09-27, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> Governor Swill wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:02:26 -0500, "Scout"
>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>>So you're saying kids as young as 12 and possibly even lower should be
>>>allowed to undergo irreversible life altering surgery?
>>>
>>>After all, since they can drive that must make them old enough, right?
>>
>> 12 is not old enough to drive. In what state is that the legal driving age?
>
> In whatever state has rural areas that the cops don't cover. :-)
>
> "My kid Jeeter really knows how to handle a combine!"
>
Being a child of a soy boy like you Chris Ahlstrom I doubt your kid could handle the flush handle in your bathroom.
Assuming you do have running water and I have doubts about that.

--
Charlie Glock
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms"
- Thomas Jefferson 1776

Charlie Glock wrote:
> On 2024-09-27, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> Governor Swill wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:02:26 -0500, "Scout"
>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So you're saying kids as young as 12 and possibly even lower should be
>>>> allowed to undergo irreversible life altering surgery?
>>>>
>>>> After all, since they can drive that must make them old enough, right?
>>>
>>> 12 is not old enough to drive. In what state is that the legal driving age?
>>
>> In whatever state has rural areas that the cops don't cover. :-)
>>
>> "My kid Jeeter really knows how to handle a combine!"
>>
> Being a child of a soy boy like you Chris Ahlstrom I doubt your kid could handle the flush handle in your bathroom.
> Assuming you do have running water and I have doubts about that.
>
>
we use an outhouse until it gets too cold

On 28 Sep 2024 00:38:01 GMT, Charlie Glock <"Charlie Glock"@localhost.com>
wrote:

>On 2024-09-27, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>> Governor Swill wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>
>>> On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:02:26 -0500, "Scout"
>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>So you're saying kids as young as 12 and possibly even lower should be
>>>>allowed to undergo irreversible life altering surgery?
>>>>
>>>>After all, since they can drive that must make them old enough, right?
>>>
>>> 12 is not old enough to drive. In what state is that the legal driving age?
>>
>> In whatever state has rural areas that the cops don't cover. :-)
>>
>> "My kid Jeeter really knows how to handle a combine!"
>>
>Being a child of a soy boy like you Chris Ahlstrom I doubt your kid could handle the flush handle in your bathroom.
>Assuming you do have running water and I have doubts about that.

That doesn't answer the question, Cuck.

--

Today's two reasons to not vote for Trump in 38 days.

17) Trump profited personally off the Presidency making an
estimated $160M from foreign countries.

18) Trump billed the Secret Service over a million dollars
when they stayed at his golf clubs and resorts protecting him.

% wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> Charlie Glock wrote:
>> On 2024-09-27, Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
>>> Governor Swill wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:02:26 -0500, "Scout"
>>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So you're saying kids as young as 12 and possibly even lower should be
>>>>> allowed to undergo irreversible life altering surgery?
>>>>>
>>>>> After all, since they can drive that must make them old enough, right?
>>>>
>>>> 12 is not old enough to drive. In what state is that the legal driving age?
>>>
>>> In whatever state has rural areas that the cops don't cover. :-)
>>>
>>> "My kid Jeeter really knows how to handle a combine!"
>>>
>> Being a child of a soy boy like you Chris Ahlstrom I doubt your kid could
>> handle the flush handle in your bathroom. Assuming you do have running
>> water and I have doubts about that.
>>
> we use an outhouse until it gets too cold

Heck, I do some of my best writing on "the throne"! :-D

So does he:

https://www.talkie-ai.com/tools/ai-video-generator/donald-trump-texting-on-toilet-in-opulent-bathroom-618379

(AI generated)

In the high aesthetic video clip, the main subject, Donald Trump, is
captured in a moment of privacy, engaged in the act of texting on his
mobile device while seated on a toilet. The toilet lid is depicted in an
open position, adding to the sense of informality and immediacy. The camera
angle likely focuses on the upper body and face of Trump, showcasing his
expressions and movements as he interacts with his phone. His pants are
depicted as being lowered to his ankles, a detail that adds to the informal
and somewhat vulnerable portrayal of the figure.

The surrounding environment presents a stark contrast, with the opulence of
gold fixtures in the bathroom juxtaposed against the decrepit and unclean
ambiance of a gas station. The presence of toilet paper scattered around
the room suggests a chaotic or neglected setting, further emphasizing the
dissonance between the luxurious fixtures and the squalor of the location.

The camera settings might be adjusted to highlight the textures and details
of both the luxurious bathroom and the grimy gas station, possibly using a
high dynamic range to capture the intricate designs of the gold fixtures
and the grittiness of the surroundings. The lighting would be carefully
managed to ensure the scene maintains its aesthetic quality, with perhaps a
focus on the subject's face to capture his emotions while the rest of the
scene remains in soft focus or chiaroscuro lighting to accentuate the
aesthetic tension.

Throughout the clip, the subject's hair is shown in a state of disarray,
adding to the sense of informality and perhaps contributing to the overall
narrative or thematic elements of the film. The aesthetic presentation of
the video is paramount, with attention to color grading, composition, and
lighting that elevates the ordinary setting to a cinematic experience.

--
If the thunder don't get you, then the lightning will.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> <snip>

Oops I did it again. Dang.

--
Someone is speaking well of you.
How unusual!

zZombie(%): we use an outhouse until it gets too cold

That must be tough when King Charles visits.
I weigh ~240 lbs; I drink ~1 gallon of water per day;
also, I piss ~1 gallon/day.

On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 10:49:11 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

>NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>It's [GAC surgery] never done below the age of 16, rarely before 18. This isn't a
>>>>>real problem, just a rhetorical point for the phobes, dishonestly.
>>>>
>>>>Citations please?
>>>
>>>I know what I'm talking about, I was referring to within the U.S.,
>>>though, it should be noted.
>>
>>So you can't support your claim??
>
>
>I defy you to refute it.
>

Refute what? You've made an unsupported claim.

I don't do the homework of liberals.

>
>>>>Honestly hormone therapy should not be used before 18 either.
>>>
>>>No.
>>
>>I'm glad we agree!
>
>
>We do not.

Laugh.

"Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:li2efjln9s4odngkhth65vhjivs8piqt40@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:02:26 -0500, "Scout"
> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>So you're saying kids as young as 12 and possibly even lower should be
>>allowed to undergo irreversible life altering surgery?
>>
>>After all, since they can drive that must make them old enough, right?
>
> 12 is not old enough to drive. In what state is that the legal driving
> age?

A lot of states.. look up agriculture use.

No license required.. and usually no or a very low age limit.

However, since I know you lack the capacity to look up such matters.. let me
cite the law for my state.

"Article 2. When License Not Required.
§ 46.2-303. Licenses not required for operating road roller or farm tractor.
No person shall be required to obtain a driver's license to operate a road
roller or road machinery used under the supervision and control of the
Department of Transportation for construction or maintenance purposes. No
person shall be required to obtain a driver's license for the purpose of
operating any farm tractor, farm machinery, or vehicle defined in §§
46.2-663 through 46.2-674, temporarily drawn, moved, or propelled on the
highways. The term "road machinery" shall not include motor vehicles
required to be licensed by the Department of Motor Vehicles."

Now, if you don't need a license then there is no age restriction. I started
driving tractors on road when I was around 10-11 years old.

So.. once again, I ask should a 12 year or possibly lower be allowed such
surgery?

On 9/30/2024 8:02 AM, Scout wrote:
>
>
> "Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:li2efjln9s4odngkhth65vhjivs8piqt40@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:02:26 -0500, "Scout"
>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>> So you're saying kids as young as 12 and possibly even lower should be
>>> allowed to undergo irreversible life altering surgery?
>>>
>>> After all, since they can drive that must make them old enough, right?
>>
>> 12 is not old enough to drive.  In what state is that the legal
>> driving age?
>
> A lot of states.. look up agriculture use.
>
> No license required.. and usually no or a very low age limit.
>
> However, since I know you lack the capacity to look up such matters..
> let me cite the law for my state.
>
> "Article 2. When License Not Required.
> § 46.2-303. Licenses not required for operating road roller or farm
> tractor.
> No person shall be required to obtain a driver's license to operate a
> road roller or road machinery used under the supervision and control of
> the Department of Transportation for construction or maintenance
> purposes. No person shall be required to obtain a driver's license for
> the purpose of operating any farm tractor, farm machinery, or vehicle
> defined in §§ 46.2-663 through 46.2-674, temporarily drawn, moved, or
> propelled on the highways. The term "road machinery" shall not include
> motor vehicles required to be licensed by the Department of Motor
> Vehicles."
>
> Now, if you don't need a license then there is no age restriction. I
> started driving tractors on road when I was around 10-11 years old.
>
> So.. once again, I ask should a 12 year or possibly lower be allowed
> such surgery?

Nope, and anyone who thinks they should, needs their head removed and
examined with red hot ice picks.

On 2024-09-30, Bill Pfister <nobody@there.org> wrote:
> On 9/30/2024 8:02 AM, Scout wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Governor Swill" <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:li2efjln9s4odngkhth65vhjivs8piqt40@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 13:02:26 -0500, "Scout"
>>> <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So you're saying kids as young as 12 and possibly even lower should be
>>>> allowed to undergo irreversible life altering surgery?
>>>>
>>>> After all, since they can drive that must make them old enough, right?
>>>
>>> 12 is not old enough to drive.  In what state is that the legal
>>> driving age?
>>
>> A lot of states.. look up agriculture use.
>>
>> No license required.. and usually no or a very low age limit.
>>
>> However, since I know you lack the capacity to look up such matters..
>> let me cite the law for my state.
>>
>> "Article 2. When License Not Required.
>> § 46.2-303. Licenses not required for operating road roller or farm > "The
Snit List
> 163 People Who Condemn Snit Michael Glasser's Psychopath Behaviors"
>
> This list needs updating but you can follow the links to the original threads
> as most, not all, but most still exist and you can see how snit behaves and
in
> his own words.
>> tractor.
>> No person shall be required to obtain a driver's license to operate a
>> road roller or road machinery used under the supervision and control of
>> the Department of Transportation for construction or maintenance
>> purposes. No person shall be required to obtain a driver's license for
>> the purpose of operating any farm tractor, farm machinery, or vehicle
>> defined in §§ 46.2-663 through 46.2-674, temporarily drawn, moved, or
>> propelled on the highways. The term "road machinery" shall not include
>> motor vehicles required to be licensed by the Department of Motor
>> Vehicles."
>>
>> Now, if you don't need a license then there is no age restriction. I
>> started driving tractors on road when I was around 10-11 years old.
>>
>> So.. once again, I ask should a 12 year or possibly lower be allowed
>> such surgery?
>
> Nope, and anyone who thinks they should, needs their head removed and
> examined with red hot ice picks.
>

And in any case, the parents should be the first people contacted.
Keeping this information from parents is not right.
These people need mental health therapy and it should be the first line of
treatment.

Of course it does not generate as much income as transitioning does so follow
the money.

--
pothead
Kamala Harris Word Salad Special Of The Day
Served Complete With Venn Diagram Dressing