'Chipotle hires robots in California to make food to avoid paying $20
min wage'

<https://thepostmillennial.com/chipotle-hires-robots-in-california-to-make-food-to-avoid-paying-20-min-wage>

'It's official! - Robots are replacing humans.

Chipotle restaurants in California have introduced two robots to replace
human workers in an effort to slash labor costs in response to the
state-mandated $20 minimum wage. The first robot called the "autocato"
can peel, stone, and cut an avocado, and then turn it into guacamole in
26 seconds. The other robot dubbed the "digital makeline" has the
ability to portion salads and bowls based on orders from the mobile app.

The robots are part of an automation push that Chipotle's executives
think could reduce the number of employees and help lower rising labor
costs, as reported by the Daily Mail. The machines are currently being
used at restaurant locations in Huntington Beach and Corona del Mar.

The controversial $20 minimum wage hike signed into law by Gov. Newsom
took effect on April 1, which immediately sparked mass layoffs and
permanent business closures. Burger King and other chains have already
reduced the number of cashiers by rolling out digital ordering terminals
in their Golden State locations.

While Chipotle believes the robots would advance its operational
procedures, the impact on its labor costs remains unclear.

"These robotic devices could help us build a stronger operational engine
that delivers a great experience for our team members and our guests
while maintaining Chipotle's high culinary standards," said Curt Garner,
Chief Customer and Technology Officer in a press release on Monday.
"Optimizing our use of these systems and incorporating crew and customer
feedback are the next steps in the stage-gate process before determining
their broader pilot plans."

The Mexican chain stated that the continued distribution of the new
machines to additional restaurants will be contingent upon feedback from
customers and staff.

Chipotle contended that the utilization of the machinery was not solely
about "efficiencies," but also about the consistency of its menu items.
The company, which operated nearly 3,400 locations in the United States,
acknowledged in July that there were legitimate customer complaints
regarding disparities in portion sizes among its stores.

The digital makeline is expected to free up a significant amount of
staff time, as two-thirds of the chain's orders are for salads and
bowls, according to executives.

It's unclear how employees feel about being replaced with robots'

John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 'Chipotle hires robots in California to make food to avoid paying $20
> min wage'

To avoid dealing with niggers and beaners. Even if robots would make $20 an
hour, it will be cheaper to hire them than those people.

> It's unclear how employees feel about being replaced with robots'

D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:

>Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.republicans,talk.politics.guns,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.computer.workshop
>
>John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 'Chipotle hires robots in California to make food to avoid paying $20
>> min wage'
>
>To avoid dealing with niggers and beaners. Even if robots would make $20 an
>hour, it will be cheaper to hire them than those people.
>
>> It's unclear how employees feel about being replaced with robots'

I'm guessing you're from alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:
>
>> Newsgroups:
>> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.republicans,talk.politics.guns,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.computer.workshop
>>
>> John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> 'Chipotle hires robots in California to make food to avoid paying $20
>>> min wage'
>>
>> To avoid dealing with niggers and beaners. Even if robots would make $20 an
>> hour, it will be cheaper to hire them than those people.
>>
>>> It's unclear how employees feel about being replaced with robots'
>
>
> I'm guessing you're from alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.

You guessed wrong, faggot.

D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:

>>> Newsgroups:
>>> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.republicans,talk.politics.guns,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.computer.workshop
>>>
>>> John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 'Chipotle hires robots in California to make food to avoid paying $20
>>>> min wage'
>>>
>>> To avoid dealing with niggers and beaners. Even if robots would make $20 an
>>> hour, it will be cheaper to hire them than those people.
>>>
>>>> It's unclear how employees feel about being replaced with robots'
>>
>> I'm guessing you're from alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
>
>You guessed wrong, faggot.

In any event, you're a racist phobe, an asshole.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:
>
>>>> Newsgroups:
>>>> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.republicans,talk.politics.guns,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.computer.workshop
>>>>
>>>> John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 'Chipotle hires robots in California to make food to avoid paying $20
>>>>> min wage'
>>>>
>>>> To avoid dealing with niggers and beaners. Even if robots would make $20 an
>>>> hour, it will be cheaper to hire them than those people.
>>>>
>>>>> It's unclear how employees feel about being replaced with robots'
>>>
>>> I'm guessing you're from alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
>>
>> You guessed wrong, faggot.
>
>
> In any event, you're a racist phobe

It’s a compliment, you stupid fuck. My ancestors for tens of thousands of
years all the way back to primitive mammals were “racists” and “phobes”.
And that’s why my genetic test together with tests of millions of other
White Americans and Europeans show no race mixing. BECAUSE THEY ALWAYS WERE
RACIST. THIS IS MY HERITAGE AND MY CULTURE. And you gonna respect it,
faggot.

D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:

>> In any event, you're a racist phobe
>
>It’s a compliment, you stupid fuck. My ancestors for tens of thousands of
>years all the way back to primitive mammals were “racists” and “phobes”.
>And that’s why my genetic test together with tests of millions of other
>White Americans and Europeans show no race mixing. BECAUSE THEY ALWAYS WERE
>RACIST. THIS IS MY HERITAGE AND MY CULTURE. And you gonna respect it,
>faggot.

And that is why you're a loser clinging to Usenet in 2024, because you
can't make it in consensus reality, you need this outdated dungeon to
spew your garbage into. You're a piece of shit, in simpler words.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ffu3fj5h0bvnfmgfcbolqli4lbget7hd65@4ax.com...
> D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:
>
>>>> Newsgroups:
>>>> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.republicans,talk.politics.guns,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.computer.workshop
>>>>
>>>> John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 'Chipotle hires robots in California to make food to avoid paying $20
>>>>> min wage'
>>>>
>>>> To avoid dealing with niggers and beaners. Even if robots would make
>>>> $20 an
>>>> hour, it will be cheaper to hire them than those people.
>>>>
>>>>> It's unclear how employees feel about being replaced with robots'
>>>
>>> I'm guessing you're from alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
>>
>>You guessed wrong, faggot.
>
>
> In any event, you're a racist phobe, an asshole.

How so?

Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:
>
>>> In any event, you're a racist phobe
>>
>> It’s a compliment, you stupid fuck. My ancestors for tens of thousands of
>> years all the way back to primitive mammals were “racists” and “phobes”.
>> And that’s why my genetic test together with tests of millions of other
>> White Americans and Europeans show no race mixing. BECAUSE THEY ALWAYS WERE
>> RACIST. THIS IS MY HERITAGE AND MY CULTURE. And you gonna respect it,
>> faggot.
>
>
> And that is why you're a loser clinging to Usenet in 2024, because you
> can't make it in consensus reality, you need this outdated dungeon to
> spew your garbage into.

Your opinion about Usenet means nothing to me. I will express my opinions
and views through whatever medium I choose, and I will never ever ask for
permission from some rando sodomite. Is that understandable?

On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 08:24:42 -0500, "Scout"
<me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:

>
>
>"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ffu3fj5h0bvnfmgfcbolqli4lbget7hd65@4ax.com...
>> D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:
>>
>>>>> Newsgroups:
>>>>> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.republicans,talk.politics.guns,comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.computer.workshop
>>>>>
>>>>> John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 'Chipotle hires robots in California to make food to avoid paying $20
>>>>>> min wage'
>>>>>
>>>>> To avoid dealing with niggers and beaners. Even if robots would make
>>>>> $20 an
>>>>> hour, it will be cheaper to hire them than those people.
>>>>>
>>>>>> It's unclear how employees feel about being replaced with robots'
>>>>
>>>> I'm guessing you're from alt.fan.rush-limbaugh.
>>>
>>>You guessed wrong, faggot.
>>
>>
>> In any event, you're a racist phobe, an asshole.
>
>How so?
>

<laughs and points>

49% of Russians support withdrawal of troops from Ukraine.
<https://kyivindependent.com/49-of-russians-support-withdrawal-of-troops-from-ukraine-poll-says/>

--

Today's two reasons to not vote for Trump in 43 days.

09) Trump's White House interfered with the FBI investigation
into Kavanaugh's sexual assaults.
10) Trump is a felon, convicted on 34 counts of business fraud.

D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:

>>>> In any event, you're a racist phobe
>>>
>>> It’s a compliment, you stupid fuck. My ancestors for tens of thousands of
>>> years all the way back to primitive mammals were “racists” and “phobes”.
>>> And that’s why my genetic test together with tests of millions of other
>>> White Americans and Europeans show no race mixing. BECAUSE THEY ALWAYS WERE
>>> RACIST. THIS IS MY HERITAGE AND MY CULTURE. And you gonna respect it,
>>> faggot.
>>
>> And that is why you're a loser clinging to Usenet in 2024, because you
>> can't make it in consensus reality, you need this outdated dungeon to
>> spew your garbage into.
>
>Your opinion about Usenet means nothing to me. I will express my opinions
>and views through whatever medium I choose, and I will never ever ask for
>permission from some rando sodomite. Is that understandable?

Frankly, I don't really buy that they're "your" opinions - they're the
ready guide in some celestial voice, you chose. I chose free will.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Governor Swill wrote:
> <laughs and points>

At your death threats?

Governor Swill /Rudy Canoza/Lou Bricano/J Carlson/Michael A
Terrell/Chris Ahlstrom/Intelligent Party and a few dozen other socks wrote:

Multiple death threats against Trump:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1-4.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <emo79jh20rlasuask9094vtlepuu5ui0av@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
<ONIkO.102541$dFU1.83026@fx11.ams4> <XnsB1AF52A9CDF3B629555@185.151.15.190>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 55
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:38:43 -0400

Oh poor me I got shot at ...

Swill
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Path:
eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.netnews.com!s1-3.netnews.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx10.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.elections
Subject: Re: Triumphant Trump Photo After Assassination Attempt
Message-ID: <4ln79j914cpespbrssonesbciii33ess3m@4ax.com>
References: <1oKdnTc9CYmJlg77nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
<XnsB1AED5FEA65AA629555@185.151.15.160>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 31
X-Complaints-To: abuse@easynews.com
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
X-Complaints-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly.
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 10:37:51 -0400

Cheer up, maybe someone else will try.

Swill

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: J Carlson <j_carlson@gmx.com>
Newsgroups:
alt.politics.immigration,alt.politics.nationalism.white,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Subject: Re: AP Lies by Ommission About Identity of Invaders Charged with
Rape, Murder of 12-Year-Old
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:35:52 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v5f66o$1mps9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v54h6j$39cuk$1@dont-email.me> <v54hrs$38mfs$18@dont-email.me>
<moKcnZP3dbqUm-r7nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
<v58c4f$6squ$8@dont-email.me>
<v5df1n$1caue$1@dont-email.me> <v5edju$1hv3p$3@dont-email.me>
<tgrl7j14lbg6f9csput4jca09qqujgd9d5@4ax.com>
<v5erpf$1jkrf$20@dont-email.me>
<O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 21:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me;
posting-host="f3de9d0c1e618b255237332494133eec";
logging-data="1795977";
mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195k8uMNmZfnyDG9tQmsu21WqljX3bfQxM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PNoPW9d+9gKJj0fX+YCk+YFslQg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <O9acnRiefIZol-b7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org alt.politics.immigration:383549
alt.politics.nationalism.white:10913 talk.politics.misc:1295918
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3024985

> No. I am a patriotic American who wants the country and its people to
thrive. Getting rid of Trump permanently
> is an important step to getting there.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That constitutes a DEATH THREAT against a former President, Rudey:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/871
18 U.S. Code § 871 - Threats against President and successors to the
Presidency
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
(a)Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail
or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any
letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any
threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon
the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice
President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office
of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or
knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the
President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the
order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years,
or both.
(b)The terms “President-elect” and “Vice President-elect” as used in
this section shall mean such persons as are the apparent successful
candidates for the offices of President and Vice President,
respectively, as ascertained from the results of the general elections
held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in
accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2. The
phrase “other officer next in the order of succession to the office of
President” as used in this section shall mean the person next in the
order of succession to act as President in accordance with title 3,
United States Code, sections 19 and 20.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 740; June 1, 1955, ch. 115, § 1, 69
Stat. 80; Pub. L. 87–829, § 1, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 956; Pub. L.
97–297, § 2, Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1318; Pub. L. 103–322, title
XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

9-65.200 - Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency; Threats Against Former Presidents; and Certain Other Secret
Service Protectees
The Counterterrorism Section of the National Security Division has
supervisory authority over 18 U.S.C. §§ 871 and 879 cases. As great
caution must be taken in matters relating to the security of the persons
protected by 18 U.S.C. § 871, United States Attorneys are encouraged to
consult with the Counterterrorism Section (CTS) of the National Security
Division when they have doubts on the prosecutive merit of a case. For
the same reason, dismissal of complaints under 18 U.S.C. § 871, when the
defendant is in custody under the Mental Incompetency Statutes (18
U.S.C. §§ 4244, 4246), requires approval from CTS. In other cases,
United States Attorneys must consult prior to dismissing a count
involving, or entering into any sentence commitment or other case
settlement involving a § 871 charge.

https://www.secretservice.gov/newsroom/releases/2024/01/phoenix-man-arrested-making-online-death-threats-against-president-and

PHOENIX –David Michael Hanson, 41, of Phoenix, was arrested on Wednesday
for making online threats against the President and Vice-President.
Hanson was charged by Federal criminal complaint on Tuesday with five
counts of Threats Against the President and Successors to the Presidency
and five counts of Interstate Communication of Threats.

The complaint alleges that in November and December of 2023, while
living in Arizona, Hanson used a social media platform to post threats
to murder the President and Vice President of the United States. On
November 19, 2023, Hanson posted online a series of threatening
statements including one that stated, “#joeAndKamala I’m asking you to
resign on Monday your alternative is death brutally murdered.” After the
U.S. Secret Service spoke to Hanson and warned him that it was a Federal
crime to post such threats, on December 23, 2023, Hanson posted another
series of similar threats aimed at the President and Vice-President.

Each count of Threats Against the President and Successors to the
Presidency carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, a fine of
up to $250,000, and up to three years of supervised release. Each count
of Interstate Communication of Threats carries a maximum sentence of
five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, and up to three years of
supervised release.

A complaint is simply a method by which a person is charged with
criminal activity and raises no inference of guilt. An individual is
presumed innocent until evidence is presented to a jury that establishes
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:
>
>>>>> In any event, you're a racist phobe
>>>>
>>>> It’s a compliment, you stupid fuck. My ancestors for tens of thousands of
>>>> years all the way back to primitive mammals were “racists” and “phobes”.
>>>> And that’s why my genetic test together with tests of millions of other
>>>> White Americans and Europeans show no race mixing. BECAUSE THEY ALWAYS WERE
>>>> RACIST. THIS IS MY HERITAGE AND MY CULTURE. And you gonna respect it,
>>>> faggot.
>>>
>>> And that is why you're a loser clinging to Usenet in 2024, because you
>>> can't make it in consensus reality, you need this outdated dungeon to
>>> spew your garbage into.
>>
>> Your opinion about Usenet means nothing to me. I will express my opinions
>> and views through whatever medium I choose, and I will never ever ask for
>> permission from some rando sodomite. Is that understandable?
>
>
> Frankly, I don't really buy that they're "your" opinions - they're the
> ready guide in some celestial voice, you chose. I chose free will.

Funny how your “free will” is repeated and asserted by all major news
outlets, corporations, politicians, etc. But, of course, I’m the one who is
brainwashed, because there’s so much Nazi propaganda out there. Literally
every TV station broadcasting Hitler speeches 24/7. Am I right?

God you fags are stupid.

D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:

>>>>>> In any event, you're a racist phobe
>>>>>
>>>>> It’s a compliment, you stupid fuck. My ancestors for tens of thousands of
>>>>> years all the way back to primitive mammals were “racists” and “phobes”.
>>>>> And that’s why my genetic test together with tests of millions of other
>>>>> White Americans and Europeans show no race mixing. BECAUSE THEY ALWAYS WERE
>>>>> RACIST. THIS IS MY HERITAGE AND MY CULTURE. And you gonna respect it,
>>>>> faggot.
>>>>
>>>> And that is why you're a loser clinging to Usenet in 2024, because you
>>>> can't make it in consensus reality, you need this outdated dungeon to
>>>> spew your garbage into.
>>>
>>> Your opinion about Usenet means nothing to me. I will express my opinions
>>> and views through whatever medium I choose, and I will never ever ask for
>>> permission from some rando sodomite. Is that understandable?
>>
>> Frankly, I don't really buy that they're "your" opinions - they're the
>> ready guide in some celestial voice, you chose. I chose free will.
>
>Funny how your “free will” is repeated and asserted by all major news
>outlets, corporations, politicians, etc. But, of course, I’m the one who is
>brainwashed, because there’s so much Nazi propaganda out there. Literally
>every TV station broadcasting Hitler speeches 24/7. Am I right?
>
>God you fags are stupid.

You're not brainwashed, you're mind-controlled, by the enemies. Divide
and conquer, they play on your biases, they get your thinking in that
negative, pessimistic, paranoid way, unable to break out of the mold -
and at the expense of promoting egalitarian ideals. It's so obvious,
yet you're a long way from realizing it, apparently.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 22:44:07 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

>D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> In any event, you're a racist phobe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It’s a compliment, you stupid fuck. My ancestors for tens of thousands of
>>>>>> years all the way back to primitive mammals were “racists” and “phobes”.
>>>>>> And that’s why my genetic test together with tests of millions of other
>>>>>> White Americans and Europeans show no race mixing. BECAUSE THEY ALWAYS WERE
>>>>>> RACIST. THIS IS MY HERITAGE AND MY CULTURE. And you gonna respect it,
>>>>>> faggot.
>>>>>
>>>>> And that is why you're a loser clinging to Usenet in 2024, because you
>>>>> can't make it in consensus reality, you need this outdated dungeon to
>>>>> spew your garbage into.
>>>>
>>>> Your opinion about Usenet means nothing to me. I will express my opinions
>>>> and views through whatever medium I choose, and I will never ever ask for
>>>> permission from some rando sodomite. Is that understandable?
>>>
>>> Frankly, I don't really buy that they're "your" opinions - they're the
>>> ready guide in some celestial voice, you chose. I chose free will.
>>
>>Funny how your “free will” is repeated and asserted by all major news
>>outlets, corporations, politicians, etc. But, of course, I’m the one who is
>>brainwashed, because there’s so much Nazi propaganda out there. Literally
>>every TV station broadcasting Hitler speeches 24/7. Am I right?
>>
>>God you fags are stupid.
>
>
>You're not brainwashed, you're mind-controlled, by the enemies. Divide
>and conquer, they play on your biases, they get your thinking in that
>negative, pessimistic, paranoid way, unable to break out of the mold -
>and at the expense of promoting egalitarian ideals. It's so obvious,
>yet you're a long way from realizing it, apparently.

It's easier to fool a man than convince him he's been fooled.

MAGAs complain about the horrible antiTrump rhetoric coming from the left. But
Trump claims that, "If Harris is elected it will be the beginning of WWIII" "If
Harris is elected we'll have the worst depression since 1929" "She'll make us
all communists on day one." "She'll destroy the country."

And the one I find particularly stupid, "America is a failed nation."

--

Today's two reasons to not vote for Trump in 43 days.

11) Trump's failed pandemic response caused the needless
deaths of hundreds of thousands. By the time he left office,
three thousand were dying every day.

12) Trump's White House scrapped the emergency pandemic
playbook that had been assembled by the Obama administration.

Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

>MAGAs complain about the horrible antiTrump rhetoric coming from the left. But
>Trump claims that, "If Harris is elected it will be the beginning of WWIII" "If
>Harris is elected we'll have the worst depression since 1929" "She'll make us
>all communists on day one." "She'll destroy the country."
>
>And the one I find particularly stupid, "America is a failed nation."

The rhetoric about Trump is deserved, the lunacy about Harris is
crazy, so yes, they want to have it both ways.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

"Joel" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:flt6fjdidhdlfen4o2ifm4p8rh7bcb0kd7@4ax.com...
> D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> In any event, you're a racist phobe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It’s a compliment, you stupid fuck. My ancestors for tens of
>>>>>> thousands of
>>>>>> years all the way back to primitive mammals were “racists” and
>>>>>> “phobes”.
>>>>>> And that’s why my genetic test together with tests of millions of
>>>>>> other
>>>>>> White Americans and Europeans show no race mixing. BECAUSE THEY
>>>>>> ALWAYS WERE
>>>>>> RACIST. THIS IS MY HERITAGE AND MY CULTURE. And you gonna respect it,
>>>>>> faggot.
>>>>>
>>>>> And that is why you're a loser clinging to Usenet in 2024, because you
>>>>> can't make it in consensus reality, you need this outdated dungeon to
>>>>> spew your garbage into.
>>>>
>>>> Your opinion about Usenet means nothing to me. I will express my
>>>> opinions
>>>> and views through whatever medium I choose, and I will never ever ask
>>>> for
>>>> permission from some rando sodomite. Is that understandable?
>>>
>>> Frankly, I don't really buy that they're "your" opinions - they're the
>>> ready guide in some celestial voice, you chose. I chose free will.
>>
>>Funny how your “free will” is repeated and asserted by all major news
>>outlets, corporations, politicians, etc. But, of course, I’m the one who
>>is
>>brainwashed, because there’s so much Nazi propaganda out there. Literally
>>every TV station broadcasting Hitler speeches 24/7. Am I right?
>>
>>God you fags are stupid.
>
>
> You're not brainwashed, you're mind-controlled, by the enemies. Divide
> and conquer, they play on your biases, they get your thinking in that
> negative, pessimistic, paranoid way, unable to break out of the mold -
> and at the expense of promoting egalitarian ideals. It's so obvious,
> yet you're a long way from realizing it, apparently.

Says the person who thinks a guy becomes a girl by putting on a dress..

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>> The rhetoric about Trump is deserved, the lunacy about Harris is
>> crazy, so yes, they want to have it both ways.
>
>So how did Trump take your rights away?
>Specifically which rights would those be?

He takes personal credit for the Dobbs decision, that alone is enough.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
> D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:
>
>>>>>>> In any event, you're a racist phobe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It’s a compliment, you stupid fuck. My ancestors for tens of thousands of
>>>>>> years all the way back to primitive mammals were “racists” and “phobes”.
>>>>>> And that’s why my genetic test together with tests of millions of other
>>>>>> White Americans and Europeans show no race mixing. BECAUSE THEY ALWAYS WERE
>>>>>> RACIST. THIS IS MY HERITAGE AND MY CULTURE. And you gonna respect it,
>>>>>> faggot.
>>>>>
>>>>> And that is why you're a loser clinging to Usenet in 2024, because you
>>>>> can't make it in consensus reality, you need this outdated dungeon to
>>>>> spew your garbage into.
>>>>
>>>> Your opinion about Usenet means nothing to me. I will express my opinions
>>>> and views through whatever medium I choose, and I will never ever ask for
>>>> permission from some rando sodomite. Is that understandable?
>>>
>>> Frankly, I don't really buy that they're "your" opinions - they're the
>>> ready guide in some celestial voice, you chose. I chose free will.
>>
>> Funny how your “free will” is repeated and asserted by all major news
>> outlets, corporations, politicians, etc. But, of course, I’m the one who is
>> brainwashed, because there’s so much Nazi propaganda out there. Literally
>> every TV station broadcasting Hitler speeches 24/7. Am I right?
>>
>> God you fags are stupid.
>
>
> You're not brainwashed, you're mind-controlled, by the enemies.

Sure. “Enemies”. Are they with you in the room right now?

> Divide
> and conquer, they play on your biases, they get your thinking in that
> negative, pessimistic, paranoid way, unable to break out of the mold -

Yeah, yeah. And I’m the conspiracy theorist, right?

You know who are your enemies? Normal people who don’t want faggots,
Haitian niggers, illegal beaners, etc. You know who are your best friends?
Soulless corporations with rainbow flags in promo materials and sellout
politicians with fake smiles. Those people always had your best interests
in mind.

D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:

>>>> Frankly, I don't really buy that they're "your" opinions - they're the
>>>> ready guide in some celestial voice, you chose. I chose free will.
>>>
>>> Funny how your “free will” is repeated and asserted by all major news
>>> outlets, corporations, politicians, etc. But, of course, I’m the one who is
>>> brainwashed, because there’s so much Nazi propaganda out there. Literally
>>> every TV station broadcasting Hitler speeches 24/7. Am I right?
>>>
>>> God you fags are stupid.
>>
>> You're not brainwashed, you're mind-controlled, by the enemies.
>
>Sure. “Enemies”. Are they with you in the room right now?
>
>> Divide
>> and conquer, they play on your biases, they get your thinking in that
>> negative, pessimistic, paranoid way, unable to break out of the mold -
>
>Yeah, yeah. And I’m the conspiracy theorist, right?
>
>You know who are your enemies? Normal people who don’t want faggots,
>Haitian niggers, illegal beaners, etc. You know who are your best friends?
>Soulless corporations with rainbow flags in promo materials and sellout
>politicians with fake smiles. Those people always had your best interests
>in mind.

<plonk>

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

In article <6m98fjh5njfq8p91sckh7ftdg2fjjaortp@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
> >> The rhetoric about Trump is deserved, the lunacy about Harris is
> >> crazy, so yes, they want to have it both ways.
> >
> >So how did Trump take your rights away?
> >Specifically which rights would those be?
>
>
> He takes personal credit for the Dobbs decision, that alone is enough.

A long time ago you said if Trump wins you will lose your rights. I
asked you what rights and what rights did you lose when he was in
office. You ran from that. Why?

In article <3kf8fjdhini1ulbs0j7fakes9ibl5a6jrk@4ax.com>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>
> D. Ray <d@ray> wrote:
>
> >>>> Frankly, I don't really buy that they're "your" opinions - they're the
> >>>> ready guide in some celestial voice, you chose. I chose free will.
> >>>
> >>> Funny how your ?free will? is repeated and asserted by all major news
> >>> outlets, corporations, politicians, etc. But, of course, I?m the one who is
> >>> brainwashed, because there?s so much Nazi propaganda out there. Literally
> >>> every TV station broadcasting Hitler speeches 24/7. Am I right?
> >>>
> >>> God you fags are stupid.
> >>
> >> You're not brainwashed, you're mind-controlled, by the enemies.
> >
> >Sure. ?Enemies?. Are they with you in the room right now?
> >
> >> Divide
> >> and conquer, they play on your biases, they get your thinking in that
> >> negative, pessimistic, paranoid way, unable to break out of the mold -
> >
> >Yeah, yeah. And I?m the conspiracy theorist, right?
> >
> >You know who are your enemies? Normal people who don?t want faggots,
> >Haitian niggers, illegal beaners, etc. You know who are your best friends?
> >Soulless corporations with rainbow flags in promo materials and sellout
> >politicians with fake smiles. Those people always had your best interests
> >in mind.
>
>
> <plonk>

Liar.

Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>In article <6m98fjh5njfq8p91sckh7ftdg2fjjaortp@4ax.com>,
>joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> The rhetoric about Trump is deserved, the lunacy about Harris is
>> >> crazy, so yes, they want to have it both ways.
>> >
>> >So how did Trump take your rights away?
>> >Specifically which rights would those be?
>>
>> He takes personal credit for the Dobbs decision, that alone is enough.
>
>A long time ago you said if Trump wins you will lose your rights. I
>asked you what rights and what rights did you lose when he was in
>office. You ran from that. Why?

I just gave you the most widely discussed one.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 11:06:10 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>
>>> The rhetoric about Trump is deserved, the lunacy about Harris is
>>> crazy, so yes, they want to have it both ways.
>>
>>So how did Trump take your rights away?
>>Specifically which rights would those be?
>
>
>He takes personal credit for the Dobbs decision, that alone is enough.

Until recently when he finally realized it was a vote loser. Now, it's not his
fault.

Denial of abortion costs a life.
<https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ApgRhx1_HbU>

--

Today's two reasons to not vote for Trump in 43 days.

11) Trump's failed pandemic response caused the needless
deaths of hundreds of thousands. By the time he left office,
three thousand were dying every day.

12) Trump's White House scrapped the emergency pandemic
playbook that had been assembled by the Obama administration.

On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 14:48:11 -0400, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:

>Skeeter <skeeterweed@photonmail.com> wrote:
>>In article <6m98fjh5njfq8p91sckh7ftdg2fjjaortp@4ax.com>,
>>joelcrump@gmail.com says...
>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> The rhetoric about Trump is deserved, the lunacy about Harris is
>>> >> crazy, so yes, they want to have it both ways.
>>> >
>>> >So how did Trump take your rights away?
>>> >Specifically which rights would those be?
>>>
>>> He takes personal credit for the Dobbs decision, that alone is enough.
>>
>>A long time ago you said if Trump wins you will lose your rights. I
>>asked you what rights and what rights did you lose when he was in
>>office. You ran from that. Why?
>
>
>I just gave you the most widely discussed one.

Leave it to Skeeter to unintentionally make himself look like a fool.

He asked, you answered, and now he's complaining about your answer?

He who has the most cash, wins the election
<https://www.youtube.com/shorts/EZUBCAfR78o>

--

Today's two reasons to not vote for Trump in 43 days.

11) Trump's failed pandemic response caused the needless
deaths of hundreds of thousands. By the time he left office,
three thousand were dying every day.

12) Trump's White House scrapped the emergency pandemic
playbook that had been assembled by the Obama administration.