I want "retro" themes. This "modern," washed-out, insipid GUI
garbage inspires me to vomit. Whenever I behold that visually
listless junk I feel nauseous as if I have the flu.

I want themes like similar to this, yet more visually impactful:

https://www.gnome-look.org/p/2167998

GTK+3/4 uses CSS to create it's themes. Who can point me in the
direction of some decent themes?

I'll offer 60,000 USD to anyone who can provide a good theme.
(The money already is in escrow.)

--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

Lester Thorpe wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> I'll offer 60,000 USD to anyone who can provide a good theme.
> (The money already is in escrow.)

:-D

--
"I have examined Bogota," he said, "and the case is clearer to me.
I think very probably he might be cured."
"That is what I have always hoped," said old Yacob.
"His brain is affected," said the blind doctor.
The elders murmured assent.
"Now, what affects it?"
"Ah!" said old Yacob.
"This," said the doctor, answering his own question. "Those queer
things that are called the eyes, and which exist to make an agreeable soft
depression in the face, are diseased, in the case of Bogota, in such a way
as to affect his brain. They are greatly distended, he has eyelashes, and
his eyelids move, and consequently his brain is in a state of constant
irritation and distraction."
"Yes?" said old Yacob. "Yes?"
"And I think I may say with reasonable certainty that, in order
to cure him completely, all that we need do is a simple and easy surgical
operation -- namely, to remove those irritant bodies."
"And then he will be sane?"
"Then he will be perfectly sane, and a quite admirable citizen."
"Thank heaven for science!" said old Yacob.
-- H. G. Wells, "The Country of the Blind"

On 9/21/2024 10:46 AM, Larry A Piet wrote:

> GTK+3/4 uses CSS to create it's themes. Who can point me in the
> direction of some decent themes?

A "computing virtuoso" could make his own theme.

> I'll offer 60,000 USD to anyone who can provide a good theme.
> (The money already is in escrow.)

No it's not, liar.

Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
> Lester Thorpe wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>
>> I'll offer 60,000 USD to anyone who can provide a good theme.
>> (The money already is in escrow.)
>
> :-D
>

Even if Feeb has $10K, it sure isn’t in an independent 3rd party escrow
account.

-hh

On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:20:47 -0400, -hh wrote:

>
> Even if Feeb has $10K, it sure isn’t in an independent 3rd party escrow
> account.
>

This whacked comment contributes absolutely nothing to the subject
of this thread.

Usenet is largely an unmoderated forum but there is a "gentlemen's
agreement" among all participants that they shall contribute to the
subject of a thread or else get the fuck out.

You have not contributed to the subject of this thread; therefore
you should get the fuck out.

However, your behavior is not at all surprising. The term "gentleman"
has its origin in the concept of "gentility," which refers to a member
of the noble classes.

There is nothing noble about your sorry ass. You possess all of the
characteristics of a barbaric peasant-peon ignoramus.

You final warning: either contribute to the subject of a thread or
get the fuck out.

--
Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.

Lester Thorpe wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> <snip>
>
> You final warning: either contribute to the subject of a thread or
> get the fuck out.

:-D

--
What you see is from outside yourself, and may come, or not, but is beyond
your control. But your fear is yours, and yours alone, like your voice, or
your fingers, or your memory, and therefore yours to control. If you feel
powerless over your fear, you have not yet admitted that it is yours, to do
with as you will.
-- Marion Zimmer Bradley, "Stormqueen"

Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> wrote:
>On Sun, 22 Sep 2024 08:20:47 -0400, -hh wrote:
>
>> Even if Feeb has $10K, it sure isn’t in an independent 3rd party escrow
>> account.
>
>This whacked comment contributes absolutely nothing to the subject
>of this thread.
>
>Usenet is largely an unmoderated forum but there is a "gentlemen's
>agreement" among all participants that they shall contribute to the
>subject of a thread or else get the fuck out.
>
>You have not contributed to the subject of this thread; therefore
>you should get the fuck out.
>
>However, your behavior is not at all surprising. The term "gentleman"
>has its origin in the concept of "gentility," which refers to a member
>of the noble classes.
>
>There is nothing noble about your sorry ass. You possess all of the
>characteristics of a barbaric peasant-peon ignoramus.
>
>You final warning: either contribute to the subject of a thread or
>get the fuck out.

Shut your fuckin' obnoxious piehole, retard.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.