'Can Harris’s Cynical, Run-out-the Clock Campaign Succeed?
Harris thinks her delays, deceptions, and vilifications for the next 47
days will ensure her victory.'

<https://amgreatness.com/2024/09/19/can-harriss-cynical-run-out-the-clock-campaign-succeed/>

'Cynically running out the clock has been the overarching principle of
the entire abbreviated 105-day presidential campaign of Kamala
Harris—ever since Joe Biden, at the 11th-hour, dropped out in July.

Harris seems unwilling or unable to answer any impromptu question that
she has not been previously prepped for. Her answers at the debate were
memorized and canned. They never addressed the questions asked.

Her single, 11-minute post-debate Philadelphia interview was a shipwreck
of dodging and dissimulating—even though the host was sympathetically
left-wing.

Even socialist Bernie Sanders pointed out that for Harris to get
elected, she must temporarily disown her lifelong leftist credentials.

As vice president, she must further deny co-ownership of the unpopular
record of the Biden-Harris administration.

Left unstated is that whether she wins the presidency—or loses it and
continues as vice president for another three months—nonetheless she
will inevitably revert back to her hard-core, lifelong leftist beliefs.

In addition, Harris has reconstructed her privileged upbringing as a
child of two PhDs, living in a posh Montreal neighborhood into a
struggling, middle-class Oakland childhood.

How can she stage such a complete makeover—and contemptuously count on
the voting public to be so easily deceived?

She avoids all news conferences, one-on-one nationally broadcast
interviews, and town halls. And like Biden, she will debate only on
leftist venues with impartial pro-Harris moderators.

When asked to provide the details of her past responsibility for the
open border, inflationary economy, spiraling crime, attacks on fossil
fuels, and collapsing foreign policy, Harris smiles, makes hand
gestures, and dodges. She changes the subject to her empathetic
personality, her “joy” campaign, and her iconic profile as a supposedly
dynamic black woman.

When pressed, Harris outsources the task of squaring her hypocrisies and
subterfuges to the stonewalling campaign, Democratic surrogates—and the
media.

Harris is also certainly not running on her demonstrable experience,
vision, or intelligence as much as she is not Trump (or, for that
matter, her former partner Joe Biden).

To make that distinction stark, Harris must demonize and bait Trump
nonstop and make the country fear him.

So, she paints Trump as a racist and violent insurrectionist, not a
former president whose four-year term saw a superior foreign policy,
economy, border, and security than during the Biden-Harris term.

Instead, Harris has repeatedly claimed Trump is a dictator and a threat
to democracy—as if he had politically weaponized the FBI, CIA, DOJ, or
IRS as had Barack Obama and Joe Biden.

Trump as Hitler has become a staple Democrat smear for the past decade.

That vicious caricature is so entrenched that major Democratic figures
assume it’s okay to joke about, or seriously call for, Trump’s demise.

So, Harris’s current prominent advisor David Plouffe years ago warned
the nation that “it is not enough to simply beat Trump. He must be
destroyed thoroughly. His kind must not rise again.”

Just last year, Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) claimed that Trump “is
destructive to our democracy, and he has to be, he has to be
eliminated.”

Even after an assassin sought to kill Trump last week, House Minority
Leader Hakeem Jeffries declared, “Extreme MAGA Republicans are the party
of a national abortion ban and Trump’s Project 2025. We must stop them.”

Harris’s dehumanizing of Trump, outsourcing the campaign to the media,
avoiding all public dialogue, and temporarily reinventing one’s politics
and biography have taken a toll on the country.

Harris was coronated the Democratic candidate without ever entering a
primary or winning a single delegate by vote. Some 14 million Democrat
primary voters were reduced to irrelevancy.

Like the 2020 Biden campaign, Harris has nationalized a new kind of
cynical campaign in which leftist candidates seek for a few months to
deceive the public into thinking they are centrist and moderate—until
elected.

Avoiding all cross-examination and outscoring the campaign to the
obsequious media is now the new norm.

Most news stories deemed unhelpful to Harris—the left-wing, pro-Harris
politics of the recent would-be Trump assassin, the lie that dozens of
bomb threats were called in against Springfield schools due to Trump, or
prominent Democrats before and after the recent assassination attempt
blaming Trump for being the target of an assassin—are suppressed by the
media.

The recent two foiled assassination attempts on Trump logically follow a
near-decade pattern of trying to destroy rather than outvote him.

The Russian collusion hoax, the laptop disinformation con, the two
impeachments, the effort to remove Trump from some 16 state ballots, and
the attempt to jail and bankrupt Trump through five criminal and civil
“lawfare” indictments and suits also led to the current hateful climate
of Trump assassination attempts.

Harris thinks her delays, deceptions, and vilifications for the next 47
days will ensure her victory.

But if so, it will be because she, her stealth campaign, and her
self-proclaimed guardians of democracy have been willing to
systematically destroy it.

John Smyth wrote:
> 'Can Harris’s Cynical, Run-out-the Clock Campaign Succeed?
> Harris thinks her delays, deceptions, and vilifications for the next 47
> days will ensure her victory.'
>
>
> <https://amgreatness.com/2024/09/19/can-harriss-cynical-run-out-the-clock-campaign-succeed/>
>
> 'Cynically running out the clock has been the overarching principle of
> the entire abbreviated 105-day presidential campaign of Kamala
> Harris—ever since Joe Biden, at the 11th-hour, dropped out in July.
>
> Harris seems unwilling or unable to answer any impromptu question that
> she has not been previously prepped for. Her answers at the debate were
> memorized and canned. They never addressed the questions asked.
>
> Her single, 11-minute post-debate Philadelphia interview was a shipwreck
> of dodging and dissimulating—even though the host was sympathetically
> left-wing.
>
> Even socialist Bernie Sanders pointed out that for Harris to get
> elected, she must temporarily disown her lifelong leftist credentials.
>
> As vice president, she must further deny co-ownership of the unpopular
> record of the Biden-Harris administration.
>
> Left unstated is that whether she wins the presidency—or loses it and
> continues as vice president for another three months—nonetheless she
> will inevitably revert back to her hard-core, lifelong leftist beliefs.
>
> In addition, Harris has reconstructed her privileged upbringing as a
> child of two PhDs, living in a posh Montreal neighborhood into a
> struggling, middle-class Oakland childhood.
>
> How can she stage such a complete makeover—and contemptuously count on
> the voting public to be so easily deceived?
>
> She avoids all news conferences, one-on-one nationally broadcast
> interviews, and town halls. And like Biden, she will debate only on
> leftist venues with impartial pro-Harris moderators.
>
> When asked to provide the details of her past responsibility for the
> open border, inflationary economy, spiraling crime, attacks on fossil
> fuels, and collapsing foreign policy, Harris smiles, makes hand
> gestures, and dodges. She changes the subject to her empathetic
> personality, her “joy” campaign, and her iconic profile as a supposedly
> dynamic black woman.
>
> When pressed, Harris outsources the task of squaring her hypocrisies and
> subterfuges to the stonewalling campaign, Democratic surrogates—and the
> media.
>
> Harris is also certainly not running on her demonstrable experience,
> vision, or intelligence as much as she is not Trump (or, for that
> matter, her former partner Joe Biden).
>
> To make that distinction stark, Harris must demonize and bait Trump
> nonstop and make the country fear him.
>
> So, she paints Trump as a racist and violent insurrectionist, not a
> former president whose four-year term saw a superior foreign policy,
> economy, border, and security than during the Biden-Harris term.
>
> Instead, Harris has repeatedly claimed Trump is a dictator and a threat
> to democracy—as if he had politically weaponized the FBI, CIA, DOJ, or
> IRS as had Barack Obama and Joe Biden.
>
> Trump as Hitler has become a staple Democrat smear for the past decade.
>
> That vicious caricature is so entrenched that major Democratic figures
> assume it’s okay to joke about, or seriously call for, Trump’s demise.
>
> So, Harris’s current prominent advisor David Plouffe years ago warned
> the nation that “it is not enough to simply beat Trump. He must be
> destroyed thoroughly. His kind must not rise again.”
>
> Just last year, Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) claimed that Trump “is
> destructive to our democracy, and he has to be, he has to be
> eliminated.”
>
> Even after an assassin sought to kill Trump last week, House Minority
> Leader Hakeem Jeffries declared, “Extreme MAGA Republicans are the party
> of a national abortion ban and Trump’s Project 2025. We must stop them.”
>
> Harris’s dehumanizing of Trump, outsourcing the campaign to the media,
> avoiding all public dialogue, and temporarily reinventing one’s politics
> and biography have taken a toll on the country.
>
> Harris was coronated the Democratic candidate without ever entering a
> primary or winning a single delegate by vote. Some 14 million Democrat
> primary voters were reduced to irrelevancy.
>
> Like the 2020 Biden campaign, Harris has nationalized a new kind of
> cynical campaign in which leftist candidates seek for a few months to
> deceive the public into thinking they are centrist and moderate—until
> elected.
>
> Avoiding all cross-examination and outscoring the campaign to the
> obsequious media is now the new norm.
>
> Most news stories deemed unhelpful to Harris—the left-wing, pro-Harris
> politics of the recent would-be Trump assassin, the lie that dozens of
> bomb threats were called in against Springfield schools due to Trump, or
> prominent Democrats before and after the recent assassination attempt
> blaming Trump for being the target of an assassin—are suppressed by the
> media.
>
> The recent two foiled assassination attempts on Trump logically follow a
> near-decade pattern of trying to destroy rather than outvote him.
>
> The Russian collusion hoax, the laptop disinformation con, the two
> impeachments, the effort to remove Trump from some 16 state ballots, and
> the attempt to jail and bankrupt Trump through five criminal and civil
> “lawfare” indictments and suits also led to the current hateful climate
> of Trump assassination attempts.
>
> Harris thinks her delays, deceptions, and vilifications for the next 47
> days will ensure her victory.
>
> But if so, it will be because she, her stealth campaign, and her
> self-proclaimed guardians of democracy have been willing to
> systematically destroy it.
>
>
>
>
>
yay yay wreck the usa

On 2024-09-19, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 'Can Harris’s Cynical, Run-out-the Clock Campaign Succeed?
> Harris thinks her delays, deceptions, and vilifications for the next 47
> days will ensure her victory.'
>
>
><https://amgreatness.com/2024/09/19/can-harriss-cynical-run-out-the-clock-campaign-succeed/>
>
> 'Cynically running out the clock has been the overarching principle of
> the entire abbreviated 105-day presidential campaign of Kamala
> Harris—ever since Joe Biden, at the 11th-hour, dropped out in July.
>
> Harris seems unwilling or unable to answer any impromptu question that
> she has not been previously prepped for. Her answers at the debate were
> memorized and canned. They never addressed the questions asked.
>
> Her single, 11-minute post-debate Philadelphia interview was a shipwreck
> of dodging and dissimulating—even though the host was sympathetically
> left-wing.
>
> Even socialist Bernie Sanders pointed out that for Harris to get
> elected, she must temporarily disown her lifelong leftist credentials.
>
> As vice president, she must further deny co-ownership of the unpopular
> record of the Biden-Harris administration.
>
> Left unstated is that whether she wins the presidency—or loses it and
> continues as vice president for another three months—nonetheless she
> will inevitably revert back to her hard-core, lifelong leftist beliefs.
>
> In addition, Harris has reconstructed her privileged upbringing as a
> child of two PhDs, living in a posh Montreal neighborhood into a
> struggling, middle-class Oakland childhood.
>
> How can she stage such a complete makeover—and contemptuously count on
> the voting public to be so easily deceived?
>
> She avoids all news conferences, one-on-one nationally broadcast
> interviews, and town halls. And like Biden, she will debate only on
> leftist venues with impartial pro-Harris moderators.
>
> When asked to provide the details of her past responsibility for the
> open border, inflationary economy, spiraling crime, attacks on fossil
> fuels, and collapsing foreign policy, Harris smiles, makes hand
> gestures, and dodges. She changes the subject to her empathetic
> personality, her “joy” campaign, and her iconic profile as a supposedly
> dynamic black woman.
>
> When pressed, Harris outsources the task of squaring her hypocrisies and
> subterfuges to the stonewalling campaign, Democratic surrogates—and the
> media.
>
> Harris is also certainly not running on her demonstrable experience,
> vision, or intelligence as much as she is not Trump (or, for that
> matter, her former partner Joe Biden).
>
> To make that distinction stark, Harris must demonize and bait Trump
> nonstop and make the country fear him.
>
> So, she paints Trump as a racist and violent insurrectionist, not a
> former president whose four-year term saw a superior foreign policy,
> economy, border, and security than during the Biden-Harris term.
>
> Instead, Harris has repeatedly claimed Trump is a dictator and a threat
> to democracy—as if he had politically weaponized the FBI, CIA, DOJ, or
> IRS as had Barack Obama and Joe Biden.
>
> Trump as Hitler has become a staple Democrat smear for the past decade.
>
> That vicious caricature is so entrenched that major Democratic figures
> assume it’s okay to joke about, or seriously call for, Trump’s demise.
>
> So, Harris’s current prominent advisor David Plouffe years ago warned
> the nation that “it is not enough to simply beat Trump. He must be
> destroyed thoroughly. His kind must not rise again.”
>
> Just last year, Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) claimed that Trump “is
> destructive to our democracy, and he has to be, he has to be
> eliminated.”
>
> Even after an assassin sought to kill Trump last week, House Minority
> Leader Hakeem Jeffries declared, “Extreme MAGA Republicans are the party
> of a national abortion ban and Trump’s Project 2025. We must stop them.”
>
> Harris’s dehumanizing of Trump, outsourcing the campaign to the media,
> avoiding all public dialogue, and temporarily reinventing one’s politics
> and biography have taken a toll on the country.
>
> Harris was coronated the Democratic candidate without ever entering a
> primary or winning a single delegate by vote. Some 14 million Democrat
> primary voters were reduced to irrelevancy.
>
> Like the 2020 Biden campaign, Harris has nationalized a new kind of
> cynical campaign in which leftist candidates seek for a few months to
> deceive the public into thinking they are centrist and moderate—until
> elected.
>
> Avoiding all cross-examination and outscoring the campaign to the
> obsequious media is now the new norm.
>
> Most news stories deemed unhelpful to Harris—the left-wing, pro-Harris
> politics of the recent would-be Trump assassin, the lie that dozens of
> bomb threats were called in against Springfield schools due to Trump, or
> prominent Democrats before and after the recent assassination attempt
> blaming Trump for being the target of an assassin—are suppressed by the
> media.
>
> The recent two foiled assassination attempts on Trump logically follow a
> near-decade pattern of trying to destroy rather than outvote him.
>
> The Russian collusion hoax, the laptop disinformation con, the two
> impeachments, the effort to remove Trump from some 16 state ballots, and
> the attempt to jail and bankrupt Trump through five criminal and civil
> “lawfare” indictments and suits also led to the current hateful climate
> of Trump assassination attempts.
>
> Harris thinks her delays, deceptions, and vilifications for the next 47
> days will ensure her victory.
>
> But if so, it will be because she, her stealth campaign, and her
> self-proclaimed guardians of democracy have been willing to
> systematically destroy it.

What else can they do?
People are catching on to her vague answers to softball questions and have grown weary of hearing
her word salad.
They have no choice but to script everything and hide her as much as possible.

Oh, I think she might be doing an interview with Oprah.
That one is sure to be hard hitting.
Yea, right.

--
pothead
Kamala Harris Word Salad Special Of The Day
Served Complete With Venn Diagram Dressing