'Bombshell ABC News affidavit released, exposes disturbing pro-Kamala
debate scheme'

'I have secretly recorded several conversations that will prove that the
Harris Campaign insisted upon not only the Fact Checking of Donald
Trump, but also insisted on what questions were not to be asked under
any circumstances or else ...''

<https://www.wnd.com/2024/09/bombshell-abc-news-affidavit-released-exposes-disturbing-pro-kamala-debate-scheme/>

The sworn statement continues: "It was agree that Donald Trump would be
subjected to fact-checking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would
not comparable scrutiny. This was widely known throughout the company
that Donald Trump would be fact-checked. In fact, various people were
assigned to fact check observations it was perceived candidate Trump
would make during the debate.

"In fact, [the] Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump
would be fact checked. This was done via multiple communications with
the Harris campaign whereas the Trump campaign was not included in the
negotiations. To my understanding, any rules negotiations and
conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the Trump
and Harris campaign involved, the Harris campaign had numerous more
calls regarding the debate rules without the Trump campaign aware or on
the call."

The statement also indicates: "The Harris campaign was provided with
sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar
topics that would appear during the debate."

"Furthermore, the Harris campaign imposed serious restrictions on the
scope of questioning, including:

No questions regarding the perceived health of President Joe Biden.
No inquires regarding her tenure as attorney general in San Francisco.
No questions concerning her brother-in-law, Tony West, who faces
allegations of embezzling billions of dollars in taxpayer funds and who
may be involved in her administration if elected.
The whistleblower claims to have "observed a pronounced bias against
Donald Trump within ABC News. Employees expressing favorable views
towards him experience significant concerns about potential
retribution."

The employee says the purpose of the affidavit is "to document and
provide transparency regarding the issue of fairness and impartiality in
the debate process and broader concerns about journalistic integrity at
ABC News."

The conclusion of the sworn statement mentions copies of the sworn
statement being sent via regular mail and FedEx to the whistleblower's
home address, and a certified letter to U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson
dated Sept. 9, 2024, "to establish a record that the correspondence was
sent before the debate commenced."

"Additionally, for further investigation, I have secretly recorded
several conversations that will prove that the Harris Campaign insisted
upon not only the Fact Checking of Donald Trump, but also insisted on
what questions were not to be asked under any circumstances or else the
Harris campaign would decline to participate in the debate."

Follow Joe on Twitter @JoeKovacsNews

On 9/16/2024 7:17 AM, John Smyth wrote:
> 'Bombshell ABC News affidavit released, exposes disturbing pro-Kamala
> debate scheme'
>
> 'I have secretly recorded several conversations that will prove that the
> Harris Campaign insisted upon not only the Fact Checking of Donald
> Trump, but also insisted on what questions were not to be asked under
> any circumstances or else ...''
>
> <https://www.wnd.com/2024/09/bombshell-abc-news-affidavit-released-exposes-disturbing-pro-kamala-debate-scheme/>
>
> The sworn statement continues: "It was agree that Donald Trump would be
> subjected to fact-checking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would
> not comparable scrutiny. This was widely known throughout the company
> that Donald Trump would be fact-checked. In fact, various people were
> assigned to fact check observations it was perceived candidate Trump
> would make during the debate.
>
>
>
> "In fact, [the] Harris campaign required assurances that Donald Trump
> would be fact checked. This was done via multiple communications with
> the Harris campaign whereas the Trump campaign was not included in the
> negotiations. To my understanding, any rules negotiations and
> conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the Trump
> and Harris campaign involved, the Harris campaign had numerous more
> calls regarding the debate rules without the Trump campaign aware or on
> the call."
>
> The statement also indicates: "The Harris campaign was provided with
> sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar
> topics that would appear during the debate."
>
> "Furthermore, the Harris campaign imposed serious restrictions on the
> scope of questioning, including:
>
> No questions regarding the perceived health of President Joe Biden.
> No inquires regarding her tenure as attorney general in San Francisco.
> No questions concerning her brother-in-law, Tony West, who faces
> allegations of embezzling billions of dollars in taxpayer funds and who
> may be involved in her administration if elected.
> The whistleblower claims to have "observed a pronounced bias against
> Donald Trump within ABC News. Employees expressing favorable views
> towards him experience significant concerns about potential
> retribution."
>
> The employee says the purpose of the affidavit is "to document and
> provide transparency regarding the issue of fairness and impartiality in
> the debate process and broader concerns about journalistic integrity at
> ABC News."
>
> The conclusion of the sworn statement mentions copies of the sworn
> statement being sent via regular mail and FedEx to the whistleblower's
> home address, and a certified letter to U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson
> dated Sept. 9, 2024, "to establish a record that the correspondence was
> sent before the debate commenced."
>
> "Additionally, for further investigation, I have secretly recorded
> several conversations that will prove that the Harris Campaign insisted
> upon not only the Fact Checking of Donald Trump, but also insisted on
> what questions were not to be asked under any circumstances or else the
> Harris campaign would decline to participate in the debate."
>
> Follow Joe on Twitter @JoeKovacsNews

Harris is too stupid and needs all the help she can get. She is there
for one purpose, to surrender the USA to China or Russia.