That didn't take long.

'MSNBC immediately blames Trump for ‘violent rhetoric.’'

<https://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-anchor-wonders-if-therell-be-calls-from-within-trump-camp-to-tone-down-his-rhetoric-after-second-assassination-attempt/>

MSNBC anchor Alex Witt questioned Sunday whether former President Donald
Trump and his campaign needed to tone down their rhetoric after the 2024
GOP nominee faced an apparent would-be assassin for the second time in
three months.

Trump was playing a round and had reportedly just finished the fifth
hole at Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach when shots were
fired, which were later confirmed to be from the scene where Secret
Service agents engaged what the FBI is investigating as an assassination
attempt on Trump.

At the time of the MSNBC discussion on Sunday’s Alex Witt Reports, the
details were still not fully known and there was question whether Trump
had been a target in the incident. Nevertheless, the conversation
quickly went to the question of whether Trump’s rhetoric may have played
a hand.

Witt asked MSNBC analyst and former Bush administration official Elise
Jordan about the political implications ahead, to which Jordan replied
that “heated rhetoric” has led to violence “on both sides of the aisle.”

“I think it’s just something that Democrats and Republicans have to be
very cognizant about: What can we all do to take the temperature down?”

Witt focused on the idea that it is Trump’s rhetoric is what needs to be
cooled, doubtfully asking whether he’d attempt to, or face calls from
within to tone down his rhetoric.

Do you expect there to be calls from within the Trump campaign to do
that? Because he’s gonna reach out to his supporters and say let’s take
this down. We do not know the source of any gunshots or gunshots. We do
not know who is responsible for this. The whole thing has yet to be 100
percent confirmed from start to finish, how this all played out. But do
you expect to hear anything from the Trump campaign about toning down
the rhetoric, toning down the violence, or would that be atypical of the
former president?

Jordan replied that the July attempt on Trump’s life briefly cooled the
temperature of the country. She said:

Remember back to the assassination attempt on President Trump’s life,
where there was talk of a new tone and the Republican convention was, by
Trumpian standards, muted. It did seem like he was trying to take it
down a few notches, then by the end of the convention speech, we were
kind of back to where we started. So I don’t know how long this moment
of unity for the country where we come together and we say I don’t want
any political opposition to be under threat of violence.

Jordan predicted any unity after Sunday’s incident might ultimately
prove “fleeting.”

On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 10:01:28 -0400, John Smyth
<smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:

>That didn't take long.
>
>'MSNBC immediately blames Trump for ‘violent rhetoric.’'
>
><https://www.mediaite.com/tv/msnbc-anchor-wonders-if-therell-be-calls-from-within-trump-camp-to-tone-down-his-rhetoric-after-second-assassination-attempt/>
>
>MSNBC anchor Alex Witt questioned Sunday whether former President Donald
>Trump and his campaign needed to tone down their rhetoric after the 2024
>GOP nominee faced an apparent would-be assassin for the second time in
>three months.
>
>Trump was playing a round and had reportedly just finished the fifth
>hole at Trump International Golf Club in West Palm Beach when shots were
>fired, which were later confirmed to be from the scene where Secret
>Service agents engaged what the FBI is investigating as an assassination
>attempt on Trump.
>
>At the time of the MSNBC discussion on Sunday’s Alex Witt Reports, the
>details were still not fully known and there was question whether Trump
>had been a target in the incident. Nevertheless, the conversation
>quickly went to the question of whether Trump’s rhetoric may have played
>a hand.
>
>Witt asked MSNBC analyst and former Bush administration official Elise
>Jordan about the political implications ahead, to which Jordan replied
>that “heated rhetoric” has led to violence “on both sides of the aisle.”
>
>“I think it’s just something that Democrats and Republicans have to be
>very cognizant about: What can we all do to take the temperature down?”
>
>Witt focused on the idea that it is Trump’s rhetoric is what needs to be
>cooled, doubtfully asking whether he’d attempt to, or face calls from
>within to tone down his rhetoric.
>
>Do you expect there to be calls from within the Trump campaign to do
>that? Because he’s gonna reach out to his supporters and say let’s take
>this down. We do not know the source of any gunshots or gunshots. We do
>not know who is responsible for this. The whole thing has yet to be 100
>percent confirmed from start to finish, how this all played out. But do
>you expect to hear anything from the Trump campaign about toning down
>the rhetoric, toning down the violence, or would that be atypical of the
>former president?
>
>Jordan replied that the July attempt on Trump’s life briefly cooled the
>temperature of the country. She said:
>
>Remember back to the assassination attempt on President Trump’s life,
>where there was talk of a new tone and the Republican convention was, by
>Trumpian standards, muted. It did seem like he was trying to take it
>down a few notches, then by the end of the convention speech, we were
>kind of back to where we started. So I don’t know how long this moment
>of unity for the country where we come together and we say I don’t want
>any political opposition to be under threat of violence.
>
>Jordan predicted any unity after Sunday’s incident might ultimately
>prove “fleeting.”

There is no unity. The Dems call for "lowering the heat" while they
turn up the flame.

On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 07:33:55 -0700, Byker <byKKKer@do~rag.net> wrote:

>On 9/16/2024 7:01 AM, John Smyth wrote:
>> That didn't take long.
>>
>> 'MSNBC immediately blames Trump for ‘violent rhetoric.’'
>
>Because he constantly engages in it.

So why did you snip the evidence of the left doing it?

Your childish follow ups doctoring removed.

On 17/09/2024 12:51, NoBody wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 07:33:55 -0700, Byker <byKKKer@do~rag.net> wrote:
>
>> On 9/16/2024 7:01 AM, John Smyth wrote:
>>> That didn't take long.
>>>
>>> 'MSNBC immediately blames Trump for ‘violent rhetoric.’'
>>
>> Because he constantly engages in it.
>
> So why did you snip the evidence of the left doing it?
>
> Your childish follow ups doctoring removed.

Please do not post political messages to ACW.

Thank you.

On Tue, 17 Sep 2024 13:57:29 +0100, David Brooks <David@nomail.afraid.org>
wrote:

>On 17/09/2024 12:51, NoBody wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Sep 2024 07:33:55 -0700, Byker <byKKKer@do~rag.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/16/2024 7:01 AM, John Smyth wrote:
>>>> That didn't take long.
>>>>
>>>> 'MSNBC immediately blames Trump for ‘violent rhetoric.’'
>>>
>>> Because he constantly engages in it.
>>
>> So why did you snip the evidence of the left doing it?
>>
>> Your childish follow ups doctoring removed.
>
>Please do not post political messages to ACW.
>
>Thank you.

Then perhaps your members will stop crossposting them.

--
Where's Melania?