'Google Growth Strategist Exposes Google’s Search Engine Manipulation
For Kamala Harris’s Campaign '

<https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/breaking-omg-google-growth-strategist-exposes-googles-search/>

'O’Keefe Media Group on Monday released undercover video of a Google
Growth Strategist exposing Google’s search engine manipulation for
Kamala Harris’s campaign.

Dakota Leazer revealed that Google has been actively coordinating with
the Kamala Harris campaign, manipulating its search engine
advertisements to favor her in the 2024 election.

As previously reported, the Harris Campaign edited news headlines with
Google search ads to make it appear major news outlets such as Reuters,
CBS News, CNN, NPR and AP are on her side.

While these major news outlets are shilling for Harris, her campaign
edited the news headlines without the outlets’ consent or knowledge.'

'The ads say “sponsored” but the outlets did not publish the text. The
favorable headlines were written by the Harris campaign.

“Google says a ‘glitch’ occurred which allowed the Harris campaign to
run paid ads with fake headlines to deceive voters.” the outlet
reported.

The Trump campaign didn’t run these types of Google ads. Only Kamala
Harris did.'

'Per O’Keefe Media Group:

“Google was essentially promoting through its ads rhetoric that was very
pro-Kamala,” admits Dakota Leazer, a Growth Strategist at Google, during
an undercover date with an OMG American Swiper journalist. Leazer
reveals that Google has been actively coordinating with the Kamala
Harris campaign, manipulating its search engine advertisements to favor
her in the 2024 election. He explains, “It seemed to link out to
legitimate news publication sites. So, it seemed like it was an ad from
PBS, but it was really an ad for the Kamala campaign,” making users
believe they were reading unbiased reports from reputable sources.

Leazer also confesses that Google’s primary objective is to generate ad
revenue through fear-based content, explaining, “I think whatever
demographic is most fearful is going to be most profitable.” According
to Leazer, the left currently represents the most fearful demographic,
which is why Google has been pushing pro-Kamala narratives for profit,
explaining “I think right now the left is more fearful than the right
is.”

He further states, “It’s all about the share of the stock price,”
revealing that Google’s liberal bias is not just political, but tied to
financial gain. He adds, “I think Google has a belief that one side will
allow them to make more money,” revealing Google’s profit motives
through driving political manipulation.

Leazer’s admission mirrors past media motives, including CNN Technical
Director Charlie Chester’s claim that “fear sells,” reinforcing the role
of big tech and media in shaping public perception through fear and
bias.

On 2024-09-10, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
> 'Google Growth Strategist Exposes Google’s Search Engine Manipulation
> For Kamala Harris’s Campaign '
>
><https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/breaking-omg-google-growth-strategist-exposes-googles-search/>
>
> 'O’Keefe Media Group on Monday released undercover video of a Google
> Growth Strategist exposing Google’s search engine manipulation for
> Kamala Harris’s campaign.
>
> Dakota Leazer revealed that Google has been actively coordinating with
> the Kamala Harris campaign, manipulating its search engine
> advertisements to favor her in the 2024 election.
>
> As previously reported, the Harris Campaign edited news headlines with
> Google search ads to make it appear major news outlets such as Reuters,
> CBS News, CNN, NPR and AP are on her side.
>
> While these major news outlets are shilling for Harris, her campaign
> edited the news headlines without the outlets’ consent or knowledge.'
>
> 'The ads say “sponsored” but the outlets did not publish the text. The
> favorable headlines were written by the Harris campaign.
>
> “Google says a ‘glitch’ occurred which allowed the Harris campaign to
> run paid ads with fake headlines to deceive voters.” the outlet
> reported.
>
> The Trump campaign didn’t run these types of Google ads. Only Kamala
> Harris did.'
>
> 'Per O’Keefe Media Group:
>
> “Google was essentially promoting through its ads rhetoric that was very
> pro-Kamala,” admits Dakota Leazer, a Growth Strategist at Google, during
> an undercover date with an OMG American Swiper journalist. Leazer
> reveals that Google has been actively coordinating with the Kamala
> Harris campaign, manipulating its search engine advertisements to favor
> her in the 2024 election. He explains, “It seemed to link out to
> legitimate news publication sites. So, it seemed like it was an ad from
> PBS, but it was really an ad for the Kamala campaign,” making users
> believe they were reading unbiased reports from reputable sources.
>
> Leazer also confesses that Google’s primary objective is to generate ad
> revenue through fear-based content, explaining, “I think whatever
> demographic is most fearful is going to be most profitable.” According
> to Leazer, the left currently represents the most fearful demographic,
> which is why Google has been pushing pro-Kamala narratives for profit,
> explaining “I think right now the left is more fearful than the right
> is.”
>
> He further states, “It’s all about the share of the stock price,”
> revealing that Google’s liberal bias is not just political, but tied to
> financial gain. He adds, “I think Google has a belief that one side will
> allow them to make more money,” revealing Google’s profit motives
> through driving political manipulation.
>
> Leazer’s admission mirrors past media motives, including CNN Technical
> Director Charlie Chester’s claim that “fear sells,” reinforcing the role
> of big tech and media in shaping public perception through fear and
> bias.
>
>
>
This has been going on for a long time. At least since the 2020 election cycle.
You can test it yourself.

Google something specific and negative about Kamala, Biden, Waltz etc and the hits at the top will
all be left wing positive links.
You have to scroll down a couple of pages to find conservative viewpoints on the same topic.
Of course this doesn't happen every single time but it does enough to make one wonder.
Try it.

--
pothead
Kamala Harris = Four More Years Of Obama.
Send Her To The Curb.
Vote snit "Kook Of the Decade".

On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:29:46 -0000 (UTC), pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

>This has been going on for a long time. At least since the 2020 election cycle.
>You can test it yourself.

This happens because Google presents results in order by popularity.

Zelensky at Military Aid Meet in Germany to Rally Ukraine's Allies
<https://www.kyivpost.com/post/38559>

The US announced a new military aid package for Ukraine valued at $250 million
to meet Ukraine's critical defense needs.

The capabilities in this package include: (list at url)
<https://x.com/DefenceU/status/1832076285679476797>
--
If Harris is guilty of word salad, Trump is serving word sewer.

#nevertrump

pothead wrote:
> On 2024-09-10, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 'Google Growth Strategist Exposes Google’s Search Engine Manipulation
>> For Kamala Harris’s Campaign '
>>
>> <https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/breaking-omg-google-growth-strategist-exposes-googles-search/>
>>
>> 'O’Keefe Media Group on Monday released undercover video of a Google
>> Growth Strategist exposing Google’s search engine manipulation for
>> Kamala Harris’s campaign.
>>
>> Dakota Leazer revealed that Google has been actively coordinating with
>> the Kamala Harris campaign, manipulating its search engine
>> advertisements to favor her in the 2024 election.
>>
>> As previously reported, the Harris Campaign edited news headlines with
>> Google search ads to make it appear major news outlets such as Reuters,
>> CBS News, CNN, NPR and AP are on her side.
>>
>> While these major news outlets are shilling for Harris, her campaign
>> edited the news headlines without the outlets’ consent or knowledge.'
>>
>> 'The ads say “sponsored” but the outlets did not publish the text. The
>> favorable headlines were written by the Harris campaign.
>>
>> “Google says a ‘glitch’ occurred which allowed the Harris campaign to
>> run paid ads with fake headlines to deceive voters.” the outlet
>> reported.
>>
>> The Trump campaign didn’t run these types of Google ads. Only Kamala
>> Harris did.'
>>
>> 'Per O’Keefe Media Group:
>>
>> “Google was essentially promoting through its ads rhetoric that was very
>> pro-Kamala,” admits Dakota Leazer, a Growth Strategist at Google, during
>> an undercover date with an OMG American Swiper journalist. Leazer
>> reveals that Google has been actively coordinating with the Kamala
>> Harris campaign, manipulating its search engine advertisements to favor
>> her in the 2024 election. He explains, “It seemed to link out to
>> legitimate news publication sites. So, it seemed like it was an ad from
>> PBS, but it was really an ad for the Kamala campaign,” making users
>> believe they were reading unbiased reports from reputable sources.
>>
>> Leazer also confesses that Google’s primary objective is to generate ad
>> revenue through fear-based content, explaining, “I think whatever
>> demographic is most fearful is going to be most profitable.” According
>> to Leazer, the left currently represents the most fearful demographic,
>> which is why Google has been pushing pro-Kamala narratives for profit,
>> explaining “I think right now the left is more fearful than the right
>> is.”
>>
>> He further states, “It’s all about the share of the stock price,”
>> revealing that Google’s liberal bias is not just political, but tied to
>> financial gain. He adds, “I think Google has a belief that one side will
>> allow them to make more money,” revealing Google’s profit motives
>> through driving political manipulation.
>>
>> Leazer’s admission mirrors past media motives, including CNN Technical
>> Director Charlie Chester’s claim that “fear sells,” reinforcing the role
>> of big tech and media in shaping public perception through fear and
>> bias.
>>
>>
>>
> This has been going on for a long time. At least since the 2020 election cycle.
> You can test it yourself.
>
> Google something specific and negative about Kamala, Biden, Waltz etc and the hits at the top will
> all be left wing positive links.
> You have to scroll down a couple of pages to find conservative viewpoints on the same topic.
> Of course this doesn't happen every single time but it does enough to make one wonder.
> Try it.
>
>
what if i don't care

On Sep 10, 2024 at 1:36:22 PM MST, "%" wrote
<aE-dna7rzfBaMH37nZ2dnZfqnPYAAAAA@giganews.com>:

> pothead wrote:
>> On 2024-09-10, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> 'Google Growth Strategist Exposes Google’s Search Engine Manipulation
>>> For Kamala Harris’s Campaign '
>>>
>>> <https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/09/breaking-omg-google-growth-strategist-exposes-googles-search/>
>>>
>>> 'O’Keefe Media Group on Monday released undercover video of a Google
>>> Growth Strategist exposing Google’s search engine manipulation for
>>> Kamala Harris’s campaign.
>>>
>>> Dakota Leazer revealed that Google has been actively coordinating with
>>> the Kamala Harris campaign, manipulating its search engine
>>> advertisements to favor her in the 2024 election.
>>>
>>> As previously reported, the Harris Campaign edited news headlines with
>>> Google search ads to make it appear major news outlets such as Reuters,
>>> CBS News, CNN, NPR and AP are on her side.
>>>
>>> While these major news outlets are shilling for Harris, her campaign
>>> edited the news headlines without the outlets’ consent or knowledge.'
>>>
>>> 'The ads say “sponsored” but the outlets did not publish the text. The
>>> favorable headlines were written by the Harris campaign.
>>>
>>> “Google says a ‘glitch’ occurred which allowed the Harris campaign to
>>> run paid ads with fake headlines to deceive voters.” the outlet
>>> reported.
>>>
>>> The Trump campaign didn’t run these types of Google ads. Only Kamala
>>> Harris did.'
>>>
>>> 'Per O’Keefe Media Group:
>>>
>>> “Google was essentially promoting through its ads rhetoric that was very
>>> pro-Kamala,” admits Dakota Leazer, a Growth Strategist at Google, during
>>> an undercover date with an OMG American Swiper journalist. Leazer
>>> reveals that Google has been actively coordinating with the Kamala
>>> Harris campaign, manipulating its search engine advertisements to favor
>>> her in the 2024 election. He explains, “It seemed to link out to
>>> legitimate news publication sites. So, it seemed like it was an ad from
>>> PBS, but it was really an ad for the Kamala campaign,” making users
>>> believe they were reading unbiased reports from reputable sources.
>>>
>>> Leazer also confesses that Google’s primary objective is to generate ad
>>> revenue through fear-based content, explaining, “I think whatever
>>> demographic is most fearful is going to be most profitable.” According
>>> to Leazer, the left currently represents the most fearful demographic,
>>> which is why Google has been pushing pro-Kamala narratives for profit,
>>> explaining “I think right now the left is more fearful than the right
>>> is.”
>>>
>>> He further states, “It’s all about the share of the stock price,”
>>> revealing that Google’s liberal bias is not just political, but tied to
>>> financial gain. He adds, “I think Google has a belief that one side will
>>> allow them to make more money,” revealing Google’s profit motives
>>> through driving political manipulation.
>>>
>>> Leazer’s admission mirrors past media motives, including CNN Technical
>>> Director Charlie Chester’s claim that “fear sells,” reinforcing the role
>>> of big tech and media in shaping public perception through fear and
>>> bias.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> This has been going on for a long time. At least since the 2020 election cycle.
>> You can test it yourself.
>>
>> Google something specific and negative about Kamala, Biden, Waltz etc and the
>> hits at the top will
>> all be left wing positive links.
>> You have to scroll down a couple of pages to find conservative viewpoints on
>> the same topic.
>> Of course this doesn't happen every single time but it does enough to make
>> one wonder.
>> Try it.
>>
>>
> what if i don't care

Tommy Shaw asked What If first.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.